Category: Writing

  • Part I: Create a one (1) page Needs Statement that addresses the following: the reason for…

    Part I: Create a one (1) page Needs Statement that addresses the following: the reason for requesting funding the significant need for the grant with existing literature and research to support the assertion the goals or expected results who will be served by the grant Part II: Locating Potential Funding Sources: Conduct an internet search and list a minimum of ten (10) possible funding sources. Each grant has to be viable to your overall grant proposal and not solely related to the focus of the proposal. Your list must include the name of the grants, the funding source [name of the organization/association], along with the website address for each listed funding source. Part III: Grant Proposal Your three (3) page grant proposal will include the following: Title page A 100-word summary of the project Outline the plan of action to implement the grant, describing the activities and a sequence of events. The description also included who on the staff of the organization would be involved; what kind of training, if necessary, would be for the staff; the anticipated outcomes; and the method of evaluating the success of the project Explanation of why should your organization receive the grant?

  • Oops!

    Get Answers. Get Unstuck. Study Faster
    Oops!
    The page you are looking for has an internal server error.
    Guess it’s time to pull up our technical team!
    Here are some useful links for you :
    Home
    Question Bank

  • Paper Outline & Reference page Rubric I. Introduction a. Includes the topic of the paper…

    Paper Outline & Reference page Rubric I. Introduction a. Includes the topic of the paper **Therapeutic Communication in Professional Nursing Practice** b. Connects the paper topic to professional nursing practice (5 points) c. Includes a clear purpose statement (5 points) d. Reminder: Introductory paragraph Length requirements for the paper is 4-8 sentences minimum. II. Body a. Clearly defines the topic. (5 points) b. Describes the connection of the paper topic to professional nursing practice. (5 points) c. Illustrates, gives examples, of the topic in practice (5 points) d. Specifically describes how the topic improves, or fails to improve, practice and support/move professional nursing practice forward and/or negatively impacts practice. (5 points) III. Conclusion a. Highlights, discusses, at least 3 main themes from the paper (5 points) b. Reminder: in the paper you will summarize these points and draw conclusions appropriately IV. References/Credibility a. Includes at least 3 articles on the reference page (5 points) b. Articles are less than 5 years old and are from scholarly, referred nursing journals. (Other disciplines may be used sparingly and only with approval from course facilitator.) (5 points) c. Articles are pertinent to the students paper (5 points)

  • Oops!

    Get Answers. Get Unstuck. Study Faster
    Oops!
    The page you are looking for has an internal server error.
    Guess it’s time to pull up our technical team!
    Here are some useful links for you :
    Home
    Question Bank

  • Oops!

    Get Answers. Get Unstuck. Study Faster
    Oops!
    The page you are looking for has an internal server error.
    Guess it’s time to pull up our technical team!
    Here are some useful links for you :
    Home
    Question Bank

  • Students are asked to reflect on what they have learned in the unit and how it may change their…

    Students are asked to reflect on what they have learned in the unit and how it may change their practice.
    In the unit you have explored the Fundamentals of Health Promotion, Ethics and evidence, Health Promotion Practice, communication in health promotion, cross cultural health promotion, evaluating health promotion programs and challenges in health promotion.
    Instructions
    Students are asked to reflect on what they have learned in the unit and how it may change their practice. In the unit you have explored the Fundamentals of Health Promotion, Ethics and evidence, Health Promotion Practice, communication in health promotion, cross cultural health promotion, evaluating health promotion programs and challenges in health promotion.
    1) Please post one discussion post in which you:
    b) list at least one concept that is still unclear to you and that you intend to explore further (400- 500 words).
    Please ensure that your discussion post includes at least two references.
    2) In addition, please post two peer responses (300-400 words each). These are replies to other students discussion postings in a way that contributes constructively to the class discussion. For example, you might disagree with a point, ask a clarifying question, or provide additional support for a position taken in the posting. Please ensure that your peer responses include at least two references for each response

  • Step 1: Interview Talk to several long-term members of your organization. Ask them to tell you a few

    Step 1: Interview Talk to several long-term members of your organization. Ask them to tell you a few specific stories that would define what your organization is and how communication is a part of that. Be persistent and probe with questions to dig deeper and uncover patterns. As you listen to the stories, go beyond the end of the story: Look for lessons and themes. Step 2: Essay Document your interview in an essay of 1500-1600 words. Remember to highlight the uncovered themes from above. Support your ideas with at least three (2) citations from credible resources no older than 5 years. Make sure to reference the citations using the APA writing style for the essay. The cover page and reference page do not count towards the minimum word amount.

  • Several of the poems by Alfred Tennyson have something to do with heroism and ask (directly or…

    Several of the poems by Alfred Tennyson have something to do with heroism and ask (directly or indirectly) questions like What makes a hero? Are there different types of heroes? Why are heroes are important to a society? Write a response paper comparing or contrasting the image of heroism in two of the poems. * Write a response paper comparing or contrasting the image of heroism in two of the poems. NB only from the poem given in the bottom “The charge of the Light Brigade”, “The Lady of Shalott”, The Epic, Ulysses and Morte d’Arthur [lines 170-440 of The Passing of Arthur, * please use simple English (words) * Give examples from the poem.

  • Select one of the Models presented in this unit: 1. Iowa model for EBP 2. Johns Hopkins model for…

    Select one of the Models presented in this unit: 1. Iowa model for EBP 2. Johns Hopkins model for EBP 3. Transformational Learning theory ( Mezirows) Consider how you might introduce this change. What barriers might you confront? 2-3 References in APA format See attachments/ https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/evidence-based-practice/ijhn_2017_ebp.html

  • Research Education Question One Locating and Characterizing Research Studies in Three Genre Value:

    Research Education
    Assignment One
    Locating and Characterizing Research Studies in Three Genre
    Value: 20%
    Due: Tuesday October 2, 2018
    It is important that you have a basic understanding of the characteristics of three approaches to research as we have identified them: (1) realist/scientific/post-positivist (quantitative), (2) subjective/interpretive/constructivist (qualitative), and (3) critical/transformative. To get an overview of the characteristics and differences among the three genres refer to Chapters 1 and 2 of Creswell (2012), Cohens Chapter 1, and particularly the two charts: Characteristics of Research Genres and Philosophical Stances. This assignment is intended to assist you in exploring these three approaches used in conducting educational research. Familiarizing yourself with research in education and in the social sciences generally means that you should be able to identify the research approach used by social scientists.
    Background
    There is considerable diversity in how educational researchers approach their research as well as in the methods they use. The three approaches mentioned provide a framework that attempts to make sense of this wide array, and hopefully helps us to better understand the research that we read. A number of the methods used by researchers fall generally within these three main categoriesbut we recognize that there are others which do not (e.g., feminist methods and philosophical analysis).
    There are different labels applied to the various research approaches. The breakdown we use parallels the one put forth by several authors including Cohen, Manion, and Morrison (2007; also 2003). These authors differentiate between positivist research, which can be thought of as traditional scientific, and naturalist research, which is interpretivist, even anti-positivist. These two categories were historically labelled quantitative and qualitative, which indicates the type of data that is common to each approach. The quantitative and qualitative language is very common, and it is what Creswell (2012) uses. Cohen et al. further identify the category of critical inquiry, which includes the political and idealogical contexts in which research is conducted and that impinge on the research process. The intent in this approach is to deliberately emancipate individuals and groups, to transform society, not just to understand them as is the overriding goal of the first two approaches.
    Cohen et al. (2007, p. 27; also 2003) summarized the central concern of each of the three thus:
    Realist/scientific/post-positivistprediction and control
    Subjective/interpretive/constructivistunderstanding and interpretation
    Critical/transformativeemancipation and freedom.
    Assignment Task
    Find three research papers on a topic of interest, one representing each of these research approaches (but not mixed methods).
    Choose a topicpresumably a research area of interest to you (e.g. class size, inclusion, technology in the classroom, differentiated instruction, homework, classroom assessment, full day kindergarten, ESL). It is preferable to use a common theme for all three articles, but you may need to use a different topic for an article because some topics do not lend themselves readily to all three approaches. Use your knowledge of the characteristics that define the three genres to select the three articles so that each is clearly representative of the approach. Choose only credible, peer reviewed journals. Do not use newspapers or popular magazines.
    To find articles, you can use the MUN Libraries Web site. You can access journals on-line by selecting E-journals on the library web site (check also the Library Tutorial). (To log on to the library as a MUN user, use your library card and PINif you do not have a PIN contact the Library.) You will also need to have Adobe Acrobat Reader to read the various journal files (Adobe Reader can be downloaded free by going to the Adobe website). Adobe allows you to download a .pdf file of the article.
    It may be useful to develop search criteria to find the articles. This means thinking about appropriate key words to use in your search. For example if you are interested in effective teacher professional development you may start with teacher professional development. You may then need to narrow your search using more specific key words like “mathematics” or “learning communities”. You may also choose key words that represent branches of the particular tradition of inquiry in which you are interested, like “interpretive” or “feminist”.
    Characterize the study according to five important descriptors of the particular genre.
    The article is to be selected based on the characteristics for that particular genrerealist/scientific/post-positivist (quantitative), subjective/interpretive/constructivist (qualitative), or critical/transformative. Begin with the Characteristics or Philosophical chart and the information found in your textbook, and choose the five characteristics you will use to apply for each study. Include the three abstracts in your paper, and the reference for each abstract. You do NOT have to use the same characteristics or philosophical stances for the three abstracts. You are asked to include the abstracts in your assignment, but you will need to read the entire study to understand the research and should refer to the study to support the characteristics you choose.
    Part 1. (a) List and describe five characteristics (you may mix from both charts) or philosophical stances of the appropriate genre which apply to each of the three studies you have chosen. For each characteristic or philosophical stance, explain in your own words what the characteristic or philosophical stance means (you may use quotes from Creswell and others), and state clearly how this characteristic or philosophical stance applies to the article (use an example from the article for support). Three or four sentences for each characteristic or philosophical stance are appropriate.
    As an example, a common characteristic that is used to distinguish realist/scientific/post-positivist (quantitative) and subjective/interpretive/constructivist (qualitative) is from data representation. Quantitative research uses numerical data and qualitative research often uses words as data. Quantitative research often asks questions such as what is the effect of or what is the difference These questions are commonly answered through statistically analyzing numerical data. Qualitative research asks questions such as what does it mean to or what do girls think about These questions are commonly answered by coding quotes from the participants into themes. (Please do not use this example in your assignment.)
    (b) For each article, briefly explain why you think the authors decided upon the research approach that was used in the study. HINT: The reason should be related to the problem or purpose of the study. Then briefly explain why the other two research approaches were not chose. Give brief examples from the articles to support your explanations.
    Part 2. Read the three attached abstracts. Decide whether each study fits best with realist/scientific/post-positivist, subjective/interpretive/constructivist, or critical/transformative research. Choose one characteristic and one philosophical stance from the charts for each abstract, and provide an example from each abstract to support each characteristic and philosophical stance.
    Part 3. Choose the research approach which you think best fits your worldview. You may find that you share characteristics or philosophical stances from more than one approach, but one approach may dominate. For part 2 of the assignment, you may also consider the mixed methods research approach. Choose three characteristics or philosophical stances for the research approach and connect these to your research interests. Use examples to support your reasoning. To illustrate, I might choose mixed methods and say that for one philosophical stance, epistemologically there are many kinds of knowledge that are both important and valid. Thus, if I am researching whether professional development has benefited teachers, I would value the teachers thoughts about what they learned and how they think they are implementing the new teaching approach, and could interview teachers. I could also use a measure of student achievement to see if the student results would complement or expand the teachers thoughts. In this way, I consider both kinds of knowledge valid and important.
    Format
    Include the abstract for each article, including the complete reference, in the body of your assignment. Simply copy and paste the abstract from the website where you found the article.
    The assignment may be completed in a grid/table format or whatever you prefer for clarity and organization.