My Blog

Tag: Nursing

  • [Solved] Psychopharmacology Discussion Week 1 reply

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Need a response ### Epigenetics and Gene Expression Epigenetics serves as the regulatory switch for gene expression by modifying chromatin structure without altering the underlying DNA sequence. This system determines how tightly DNA is wound around proteins called histones. When chemical tags like …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Need a response

    ### Epigenetics and Gene Expression

    Epigenetics serves as the regulatory switch for gene expression by modifying chromatin structure without altering the underlying DNA sequence. This system determines how tightly DNA is wound around proteins called histones. When chemical tags like methyl groups are added (methylation), the chromatin condenses, silencing the gene by making it inaccessible for transcription. Conversely, acetylation relaxes the chromatin, allowing the cellular machinery to read the DNA and produce proteins. This process is highly dynamic and explains how external factors, such as chronic stress or pharmaceutical interventions, can leave lasting signatures on a person's biological function.

    ### Neuron Structure and Neurotransmission

    A neuron is the fundamental signaling unit of the nervous system, consisting of three primary parts: the dendrites (which receive signals), the cell body or soma, and the axon (which transmits signals). Neurotransmission occurs through a combination of electrical and chemical events:

    1. Action Potential: An electrical impulse travels down the axon to the presynaptic terminal.
    2. Exocytosis: The impulse triggers vesicles to fuse with the cell membrane, releasing neurotransmitters into the synaptic gap.
    3. Binding: These chemicals diffuse across the synapse and bind to receptors on the postsynaptic neuron.
    4. Termination: The signal is ended via reuptake through transporters or enzymatic degradation.

    ### Messenger Systems: G-Proteins vs. Ion Channels

    The brain utilizes two primary messenger systems to interpret incoming chemical signals:

    Ligand-Gated Ion Channels: These act as fast messengers. When a neurotransmitter binds, the channel opens immediately to allow ions like Sodium or Chloride to enter the cell. This results in an instantaneous electrical change.

    G-Protein-Linked Receptors: These represent a slow but more complex second-messenger system. These receptors span the cell membrane seven times. When activated, they do not open a hole for ions; instead, they change shape to activate an internal G-protein. This protein acts as a molecular manager, triggering a cascade of downstream events, such as activating enzymes or moving deep into the nucleus to influence gene expression via the epigenetic mechanisms mentioned above.

  • [Solved] informatics week 1 –

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering informatics week 1 -.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Decision Making

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Decision Making.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] The future of Nursing

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (1)** – ## Thefutureofnursing.docx **## Thefutureofnursing.docx** It is anticipated that the initial discussion post should be in the range of 250-300 words. Substantive content is imperative for all posts. All discussion prompt elements for the topic must be addressed. Please proofread your…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (1)**

    – ## Thefutureofnursing.docx

    **## Thefutureofnursing.docx**

    It is anticipated that the initial discussion post should be in the range of 250-300 words. Substantive content is imperative for all posts. All discussion prompt elements for the topic must be addressed. Please proofread your response carefully for grammar and spelling. All posts should be supported by a minimum of 2 scholarly sources ideally within the last 5 years. Journals and websites must be cited appropriately. Citations and references must adhere to current APA format.

    Please answer the following question for your initial discussion post:

    1. If it was up to you, what should the future of nursing look like? Focus on Nursing Practice, Nursing Leadership OR Nursing Education.

    2. For ONE of these 3 areas:

    · Discuss an improvement or an innovation for the future of nursing.

    · What is needed to make that vision for an improvement or an innovation a reality?

    · How would this improvement or innovation change the way nurses practice, lead, or educate (based on your focus area of nursing)?

    · Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.

    · The discussion requirements include that you upload a file of the full-text article for each listed Reference.

    **## Thefutureofnursing.docx**

    It is anticipated that the initial discussion post should be in the range of 250-300 words. Substantive content is imperative for all posts. All discussion prompt elements for the topic must be addressed. Please proofread your response carefully for grammar and spelling. All posts should be supported by a minimum of 2 scholarly sources ideally within the last 5 years. Journals and websites must be cited appropriately. Citations and references must adhere to current APA format.

    Please answer the following question for your initial discussion post:

    1. If it was up to you, what should the future of nursing look like? Focus on Nursing Practice, Nursing Leadership OR Nursing Education.

    2. For ONE of these 3 areas:

    · Discuss an improvement or an innovation for the future of nursing.

    · What is needed to make that vision for an improvement or an innovation a reality?

    · How would this improvement or innovation change the way nurses practice, lead, or educate (based on your focus area of nursing)?

    · Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.

    · The discussion requirements include that you upload a file of the full-text article for each listed Reference.

  • [Solved] Technology decision making

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Identify the process for decision making regarding technology. Discuss nursing role in identifying appropriate technology for practice. Your post should include the following: 1. One technology application used in health care to facilitate decision making.( Barcode Medication Administration System) …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Identify the process for decision making regarding technology. Discuss nursing role in identifying appropriate technology for practice.

    Your post should include the following:

    1. One technology application used in health care to facilitate decision making.( Barcode Medication Administration System)

    2. The application’s impact on quality of decision making.

    3. The process for selecting and implementing the application.
    4. A risk assessment of the application.
    5. The costs associated with the application.

    6. Nurses’ role(s) in selecting and evaluating the application.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    – post should be formatted per the current APA and 4-5 pages in length, excluding the title and references page.
    – Incorporate citations from the textbook Nelson, R., & Staggers, N. (2014). Health informatics: An interprofessional approach St. Louis, MO: Mosby. ISBN: 9780323402316
    – And a minimum of 5 current (published within the last five years) _scholarly journal articles_ or _primary legal sources_ (statutes, court opinions) within your work.

  • [Solved] Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (1)** – ## ArticleGradingTable.docx **## ArticleGradingTable.docx** **Module 6:** _Article Grading Table_ **Instructions** Prepare a data extraction of 5 peer reviewed journals. As a DNP, you need to be able to evaluate peer reviewed journals and appropriately appraise the articles to evalua…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (1)**

    – ## ArticleGradingTable.docx

    **## ArticleGradingTable.docx**

    **Module 6:** _Article Grading Table_

    **Instructions**

    Prepare a data extraction of 5 peer reviewed journals. As a DNP, you need to be able to evaluate peer reviewed journals and appropriately appraise the articles to evaluate if the information can be used to answer the clinical question.

    **Clinical Question:**

    In patients diagnosed with Tuberculosis
    **(P)** is a CT scan
    **(I)** compared to MRI
    **(C)** more accurate diagnosing
    **(O)** TB caverns during patient assessment T?

    P = Patient Population – TB Patients

    I = Intervention or issue – CT scan

    C = Comparison Intervention or Status – Comparison of a CT vs MRI

    O = Outcome – Diagnosing accuracy (TB Caverns)

    T: Time – Patient assessment

    Based on the question above please complete the following:

    1. Find 5 peer reviewed journals articles

    2. Read the articles (take notes, look for key points)

    3. Fill out the form for each article – John Hopkins Article Appraisal Form (Microsoft Word file)

    4. Return the forms for evaluation and grading

    **Use an Essay Format**

    · You must present your writing double-spaced, in a Times New Roman, Arial or Courier New font, with a font size of 12.

    · Pay attention to grammar rules (spelling and syntax).

    · Your work must be original and must not contain material copied from books or the internet.

    · When citing the work of other authors, include citations and references using APA style to respect their intellectual property and avoid plagiarism.

    · Remember that your writing must have a header or a cover page that includes the name of the institution, the program, the course code, the title of the activity, your name and student number, and the assignment's due date.

    Contribute a minimum of 5 pages. It should include at least 3 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

    Be sure to review the
    [academic expectations](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/1876/pages/expectations-and-best-practices-for-assignments) for your submission.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · Submit your assignment by 11:59 PM Eastern on Sunday.

    · Review the rubric to determine how your assignment will be graded.

    · Your assignment will be run through Turnitin to check for plagiarism.

    **fficial Rubric for Case Study Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | – Official Rubric for Case Study Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking and Logical Reasoning<br>Development of Ideas | **40 to >36.0 ptsExcellent** The case study provided all basic and complex details are considered, and the situation, problem, or diagnosis is identified. Next, the thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents excellent evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information.<br> <br>**36 to >32.0 ptsGood** The case study provided the most basic and complex details are considered, and the situation, problem, or diagnosis is identified. Next, the thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents good evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information.<br> <br>**32 to >28.0 ptsFair** The case study provided some basic and complex details, identifying the situation, problem, or diagnosis. Next, the thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents limited evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information.<br> <br>**28 to >24.0 ptsPoor** The case study provided only minimal details and lacked a clear identification of the situation, problem, or diagnosis. The thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is not linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents weak or no evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information.<br> <br>**24 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 40 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent<br>Mastery | **25 to >23.0 ptsExcellent** The response shows exemplary mastery of the theoretical concepts applicable to the situation, recognizing all basic and complex factors. Furthermore, based on the case study presented, the response exceeds the requested information.<br> <br>**23 to >20.0 ptsGood** The response shows good mastery of the theoretical concepts applicable to the situation, recognizing the most basic and complex factors. Based on the situation presented, the response complies with the information requested.<br> <br>**20 to >18.0 ptsFair** The response shows fair mastery of the theoretical concepts applicable to the situation, recognizing the basic factors. However, based on the situation presented, the response minimally complies with the information requested.<br> <br>**18 to >15.0 ptsPoor** The response does not show mastery of the professional theoretical concepts applicable to the situation. Analysis misses many factors and details. The response does not comply with the information requested.<br> <br>**15 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 25 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInformation Literacy<br>Quality of Resources | **15 to >14.0 ptsExcellent** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, up to date (depending on what is acceptable in the field), from credible and trusted sources, and the number of sources meets the requested amount.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsGood** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 1 source is not a credible and trusted source; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount.<br> <br>**12 to >11.0 ptsFair** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 2 or more sources are not credible and trusted sources; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount.<br> <br>**11 to >9.0 ptsPoor** The following criteria would apply, supporting information is not pertinent to the topic, none of the sources are from credible or trusted sources, or the number of sources requested was not met.<br> <br>**9 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** Resources did not reflect the requested outcomes, were off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 15 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting<br>Mechanics, Grammar, and APA | **10 to >9.0 ptsExcellent** Excellence in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure. Sentences are not too long and are complete sentences.<br> <br>**9 to >8.0 ptsGood** Minimal (1 – 3) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**8 to >7.0 ptsFair** Multiple (4 -7) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**7 to >6.0 ptsPoor** Severe (8 – 10) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**6 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** Unacceptable (11 or more) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. | 10 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormat<br>Organization and Presentation of Information | **10 to >9.0 ptsExcellent** The document has a high level of professional appearance. Material is formatted exceptionally well, presented in a highly organized fashion, and aligned with assignment requirements. Includes sections and subtitles as required.<br> <br>**9 to >8.0 ptsGood** The document has a good, professional appearance. Overall, the material is formatted and presented in an organized fashion, aligned with assignment requirements. Includes sections and subtitles as required.<br> <br>**8 to >7.0 ptsFair** The presentation of information does not appear professional or approaching proficiency. For example, the assignment missed required sections, subtitles, or other elements.<br> <br>**7 to >6.0 ptsPoor** The presentation of information lacks a clear demonstration of a professional appearance. The assignment is missing several required sections, subtitles, or other elements.<br> <br>**6 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 10 pts |

    Total Points: 100

    **## ArticleGradingTable.docx**

    **Module 6:** _Article Grading Table_

    **Instructions**

    Prepare a data extraction of 5 peer reviewed journals. As a DNP, you need to be able to evaluate peer reviewed journals and appropriately appraise the articles to evaluate if the information can be used to answer the clinical question.

    **Clinical Question:**

    In patients diagnosed with Tuberculosis
    **(P)** is a CT scan
    **(I)** compared to MRI
    **(C)** more accurate diagnosing
    **(O)** TB caverns during patient assessment T?

    P = Patient Population – TB Patients

    I = Intervention or issue – CT scan

    C = Comparison Intervention or Status – Comparison of a CT vs MRI

    O = Outcome – Diagnosing accuracy (TB Caverns)

    T: Time – Patient assessment

    Based on the question above please complete the following:

    1. Find 5 peer reviewed journals articles

    2. Read the articles (take notes, look for key points)

    3. Fill out the form for each article – John Hopkins Article Appraisal Form (Microsoft Word file)

    4. Return the forms for evaluation and grading

    **Use an Essay Format**

    · You must present your writing double-spaced, in a Times New Roman, Arial or Courier New font, with a font size of 12.

    · Pay attention to grammar rules (spelling and syntax).

    · Your work must be original and must not contain material copied from books or the internet.

    · When citing the work of other authors, include citations and references using APA style to respect their intellectual property and avoid plagiarism.

    · Remember that your writing must have a header or a cover page that includes the name of the institution, the program, the course code, the title of the activity, your name and student number, and the assignment's due date.

    Contribute a minimum of 5 pages. It should include at least 3 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

    Be sure to review the
    [academic expectations](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/1876/pages/expectations-and-best-practices-for-assignments) for your submission.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · Submit your assignment by 11:59 PM Eastern on Sunday.

    · Review the rubric to determine how your assignment will be graded.

    · Your assignment will be run through Turnitin to check for plagiarism.

    **fficial Rubric for Case Study Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | – Official Rubric for Case Study Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking and Logical Reasoning<br>Development of Ideas | **40 to >36.0 ptsExcellent** The case study provided all basic and complex details are considered, and the situation, problem, or diagnosis is identified. Next, the thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents excellent evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information.<br> <br>**36 to >32.0 ptsGood** The case study provided the most basic and complex details are considered, and the situation, problem, or diagnosis is identified. Next, the thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents good evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information.<br> <br>**32 to >28.0 ptsFair** The case study provided some basic and complex details, identifying the situation, problem, or diagnosis. Next, the thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents limited evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information.<br> <br>**28 to >24.0 ptsPoor** The case study provided only minimal details and lacked a clear identification of the situation, problem, or diagnosis. The thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is not linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents weak or no evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information.<br> <br>**24 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 40 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent<br>Mastery | **25 to >23.0 ptsExcellent** The response shows exemplary mastery of the theoretical concepts applicable to the situation, recognizing all basic and complex factors. Furthermore, based on the case study presented, the response exceeds the requested information.<br> <br>**23 to >20.0 ptsGood** The response shows good mastery of the theoretical concepts applicable to the situation, recognizing the most basic and complex factors. Based on the situation presented, the response complies with the information requested.<br> <br>**20 to >18.0 ptsFair** The response shows fair mastery of the theoretical concepts applicable to the situation, recognizing the basic factors. However, based on the situation presented, the response minimally complies with the information requested.<br> <br>**18 to >15.0 ptsPoor** The response does not show mastery of the professional theoretical concepts applicable to the situation. Analysis misses many factors and details. The response does not comply with the information requested.<br> <br>**15 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 25 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInformation Literacy<br>Quality of Resources | **15 to >14.0 ptsExcellent** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, up to date (depending on what is acceptable in the field), from credible and trusted sources, and the number of sources meets the requested amount.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsGood** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 1 source is not a credible and trusted source; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount.<br> <br>**12 to >11.0 ptsFair** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 2 or more sources are not credible and trusted sources; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount.<br> <br>**11 to >9.0 ptsPoor** The following criteria would apply, supporting information is not pertinent to the topic, none of the sources are from credible or trusted sources, or the number of sources requested was not met.<br> <br>**9 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** Resources did not reflect the requested outcomes, were off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 15 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting<br>Mechanics, Grammar, and APA | **10 to >9.0 ptsExcellent** Excellence in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure. Sentences are not too long and are complete sentences.<br> <br>**9 to >8.0 ptsGood** Minimal (1 – 3) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**8 to >7.0 ptsFair** Multiple (4 -7) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**7 to >6.0 ptsPoor** Severe (8 – 10) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**6 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** Unacceptable (11 or more) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. | 10 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormat<br>Organization and Presentation of Information | **10 to >9.0 ptsExcellent** The document has a high level of professional appearance. Material is formatted exceptionally well, presented in a highly organized fashion, and aligned with assignment requirements. Includes sections and subtitles as required.<br> <br>**9 to >8.0 ptsGood** The document has a good, professional appearance. Overall, the material is formatted and presented in an organized fashion, aligned with assignment requirements. Includes sections and subtitles as required.<br> <br>**8 to >7.0 ptsFair** The presentation of information does not appear professional or approaching proficiency. For example, the assignment missed required sections, subtitles, or other elements.<br> <br>**7 to >6.0 ptsPoor** The presentation of information lacks a clear demonstration of a professional appearance. The assignment is missing several required sections, subtitles, or other elements.<br> <br>**6 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 10 pts |

    Total Points: 100

  • [Solved] Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (1)** – ## HumanExistenceandUniversalEnergy.docx **## HumanExistenceandUniversalEnergy.docx** **Module 6:** _Human Existence and Universal Energy Models_ **Instructions:** Please choose one of the Models or Theories focused on Human Existence and Universal Energy discussed in this module, de…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (1)**

    – ## HumanExistenceandUniversalEnergy.docx

    **## HumanExistenceandUniversalEnergy.docx**

    **Module 6:** _Human Existence and Universal Energy Models_

    **Instructions:**

    Please choose one of the Models or Theories focused on Human Existence and Universal Energy discussed in this module, define it, and examine literature about the theory identifying other concepts used in theory.

    Contribute a minimum of 4 pages (excluding title page and references page). It should include at least 3 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

    Be sure to review the
    [academic expectations](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/1876/pages/expectations-and-best-practices-for-assignments) for your submission.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · Submit your assignment by 11:59 PM Eastern on Sunday.

    · Review the rubric to determine how your assignment will be graded.

    · Your assignment will be run through Turnitin to check for plagiarism.

    ·
    [File Upload](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/44901/assignments/880075)

    ·
    [Text Entry](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/44901/assignments/880075)

    ·
    [Studio](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/44901/assignments/880075)

    ·
    [Google Drive](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/44901/assignments/880075)

    ·
    [Office 365](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/44901/assignments/880075)

    Top of Form

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | Upload a file, or choose a file you've already uploaded. |
    | Drag a file here, or<br>Choose a file to upload |
    | | |
    | |
    | <="" div="" style="margin: 10px 0px;"><br>I agree to the tool's <br>[End-User License AgreementLinks to an external site.](https://agmu.turnitin.com/integrations/cpf/eula/agmu)<br>This assignment submission is my own, original work<br>* | |
    | |

    Bottom of Form

    Rubric

    **- Official Assignment Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | – Official Assignment Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessionalism<br>Concept Application | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** The student meets 90% to 100% of the required content criteria by mastering both rudimentary and complex elements and, in addition, applying high-level facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. Lastly, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** The student meets 80% to 89% of the required content criteria by recognizing the fundamental, rudimentary, and complex elements and applying proficient facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. Lastly, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** The student meets 70% to 79% of the required content criteria by recognizing rudimentary and complex elements and demonstrating facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. All of the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The student meets less than 70% of the required content criteria with a low-level approach of rudimentary and complex elements and a lack of application facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. However, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar<br>Written Communication | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** Excellence in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure. Sentences are not too long and are complete sentences.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** Minimal (1 – 3) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** Multiple (4 -7) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** Severe (8 – 10) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** Unacceptable (11 or more) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCommunication<br>Specific Formatting | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** The assignment meets 90 % – 100% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. Additionally, the presented information is complete in all the required components and exceeds expectations.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** The assignment meets 80% to 89% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. Additionally, the presented information meets all the necessary components and formatting requirements.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** The assignment meets 70% to 79% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. However, the presented information is missing some key details, but overall does not disrupt the required format.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The assignment meets at most 69% of the required formatting elements in the description. The presented information is missing some key details that disrupt the needed formatting.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical and Logical Thinking<br>Thought analysis process | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** The assignment meets 90% to 100% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, and diagnosis awareness that are accurate and correctly documented. In addition, the analysis offers a clear and concise analysis along with an impeccable and precise, well-thought process.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** The assignment meets 80% to 89% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, and diagnosis awareness which are accurate and correctly documented. The analysis is well communicated, and the fundamental thought process presented in the written piece clearly aligns with the assignment expectations.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** The assignment satisfies 70% to 79% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, or diagnosis awareness but may overlook some essential parameters. The analysis and thought process presented in the written piece is evident; however, still developing.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The assignment meets at most 69% of rudimentary details, situations, problems, or diagnosis awareness, but there was a severe overlook of some essential parameters. In addition, the analysis and thought process presented in the written piece is not evident and not founded on previous discussions or information.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAcademic Literacy<br>Quality of Sources and APA Citations | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, up to date (depending on what is acceptable in the field), from credible and trusted sources, and the number of sources meets the requested amount. Additionally, all sources are recognized or cited properly.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 1 source is not a credible and trusted source; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount. The essay offers correct formatting on the setup, and title page, with minimal formatting or punctuation errors within the in-text citations or references.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 2 or more sources are not credible and trusted sources; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount. The essay offers correct formatting, setup, and title page but has significant errors within in-text citations and references.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The following criteria would apply, supporting information is not pertinent to the topic, none of the sources are from credible or trusted sources, or the number of sources requested was not met. The essay offers severe incorrect APA formatting, setup or missing title page, and/or problematic in-text citations and references.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |

    Total Points: 100

    **## HumanExistenceandUniversalEnergy.docx**

    **Module 6:** _Human Existence and Universal Energy Models_

    **Instructions:**

    Please choose one of the Models or Theories focused on Human Existence and Universal Energy discussed in this module, define it, and examine literature about the theory identifying other concepts used in theory.

    Contribute a minimum of 4 pages (excluding title page and references page). It should include at least 3 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

    Be sure to review the
    [academic expectations](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/1876/pages/expectations-and-best-practices-for-assignments) for your submission.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · Submit your assignment by 11:59 PM Eastern on Sunday.

    · Review the rubric to determine how your assignment will be graded.

    · Your assignment will be run through Turnitin to check for plagiarism.

    ·
    [File Upload](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/44901/assignments/880075)

    ·
    [Text Entry](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/44901/assignments/880075)

    ·
    [Studio](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/44901/assignments/880075)

    ·
    [Google Drive](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/44901/assignments/880075)

    ·
    [Office 365](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/44901/assignments/880075)

    Top of Form

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | Upload a file, or choose a file you've already uploaded. |
    | Drag a file here, or<br>Choose a file to upload |
    | | |
    | |
    | <="" div="" style="margin: 10px 0px;"><br>I agree to the tool's <br>[End-User License AgreementLinks to an external site.](https://agmu.turnitin.com/integrations/cpf/eula/agmu)<br>This assignment submission is my own, original work<br>* | |
    | |

    Bottom of Form

    Rubric

    **- Official Assignment Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | – Official Assignment Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessionalism<br>Concept Application | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** The student meets 90% to 100% of the required content criteria by mastering both rudimentary and complex elements and, in addition, applying high-level facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. Lastly, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** The student meets 80% to 89% of the required content criteria by recognizing the fundamental, rudimentary, and complex elements and applying proficient facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. Lastly, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** The student meets 70% to 79% of the required content criteria by recognizing rudimentary and complex elements and demonstrating facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. All of the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The student meets less than 70% of the required content criteria with a low-level approach of rudimentary and complex elements and a lack of application facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. However, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar<br>Written Communication | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** Excellence in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure. Sentences are not too long and are complete sentences.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** Minimal (1 – 3) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** Multiple (4 -7) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** Severe (8 – 10) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** Unacceptable (11 or more) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCommunication<br>Specific Formatting | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** The assignment meets 90 % – 100% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. Additionally, the presented information is complete in all the required components and exceeds expectations.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** The assignment meets 80% to 89% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. Additionally, the presented information meets all the necessary components and formatting requirements.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** The assignment meets 70% to 79% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. However, the presented information is missing some key details, but overall does not disrupt the required format.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The assignment meets at most 69% of the required formatting elements in the description. The presented information is missing some key details that disrupt the needed formatting.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical and Logical Thinking<br>Thought analysis process | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** The assignment meets 90% to 100% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, and diagnosis awareness that are accurate and correctly documented. In addition, the analysis offers a clear and concise analysis along with an impeccable and precise, well-thought process.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** The assignment meets 80% to 89% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, and diagnosis awareness which are accurate and correctly documented. The analysis is well communicated, and the fundamental thought process presented in the written piece clearly aligns with the assignment expectations.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** The assignment satisfies 70% to 79% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, or diagnosis awareness but may overlook some essential parameters. The analysis and thought process presented in the written piece is evident; however, still developing.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The assignment meets at most 69% of rudimentary details, situations, problems, or diagnosis awareness, but there was a severe overlook of some essential parameters. In addition, the analysis and thought process presented in the written piece is not evident and not founded on previous discussions or information.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAcademic Literacy<br>Quality of Sources and APA Citations | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, up to date (depending on what is acceptable in the field), from credible and trusted sources, and the number of sources meets the requested amount. Additionally, all sources are recognized or cited properly.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 1 source is not a credible and trusted source; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount. The essay offers correct formatting on the setup, and title page, with minimal formatting or punctuation errors within the in-text citations or references.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 2 or more sources are not credible and trusted sources; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount. The essay offers correct formatting, setup, and title page but has significant errors within in-text citations and references.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The following criteria would apply, supporting information is not pertinent to the topic, none of the sources are from credible or trusted sources, or the number of sources requested was not met. The essay offers severe incorrect APA formatting, setup or missing title page, and/or problematic in-text citations and references.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |

    Total Points: 100

  • [Solved] Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (1)** – ## Module6.docx **## Module6.docx** **Module 6:** _Descriptive and Inferential Statistics: Identifying Them in Journals_ **Instructions** Distinguish between the organization of articles by evidence level and organization of articles by clinical question (Essay). Please utilize Figur…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (1)**

    – ## Module6.docx

    **## Module6.docx**

    **Module 6:** _Descriptive and Inferential Statistics: Identifying Them in Journals_

    **Instructions**

    Distinguish between the organization of articles by evidence level and organization of articles by clinical question (Essay). Please utilize Figure 1 John Hopkins Evidence Based-Practice Model for Nursing and Health Care Professionals.

    Once all the articles considered important to answer the clinical question have been gathered, the DNP should be able organize the articles by level of evidence and type of evidence.

    1. What is the purpose of the article organization?

    2. How do you compare the article organization by type of evidence vs the organization based on the type of clinical question?

    3. What is the best way to organize the studies when the organization is based on the clinical question?

    **Use an Essay Format**

    · You must present your writing double-spaced, in a Times New Roman, Arial or Courier New font, with a font size of 12.

    · Pay attention to grammar rules (spelling and syntax).

    · Your work must be original and must not contain material copied from books or the internet.

    · When citing the work of other authors, include citations and references using APA 7th style to respect their intellectual property and avoid plagiarism.

    · Remember that your writing must have a header or a cover page that includes the name of the institution, the program, the course code, the title of the activity, your name and student number, and the assignment's due date.

    Contribute a minimum of 5 pages. It should include at least 3 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

    Be sure to review the
    [academic expectations](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/1876/pages/expectations-and-best-practices-for-assignments) for your submission.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · Submit your assignment by 11:59 PM Eastern on the due date.

    · Review the rubric to determine how your assignment will be graded.

    · Your assignment will be run through Turnitin to check for plagiarism.

    ·
    [File Upload](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/44875/assignments/877917)

    ·
    [Studio](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/44875/assignments/877917)

    ·
    [Google Drive](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/44875/assignments/877917)

    ·
    [Office 365](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/44875/assignments/877917)

    Top of Form

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | Upload a file, or choose a file you've already uploaded. |
    | Drag a file here, or<br>Choose a file to upload |
    | | |
    | |
    | <="" div="" style="margin: 10px 0px;"><br>I agree to the tool's <br>[End-User License Agreement](https://agmu.turnitin.com/integrations/cpf/eula/agmu)<br>This assignment submission is my own, original work<br>* | |
    | |

    Bottom of Form

    Rubric

    **- Official Essay Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | – Official Essay Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent<br>Mastery of the Information | **30 to >27.0 ptsExcellent** The essay content properly aligns with the information requested and reflects student exemplary mastery of the content by showing complete information, details, and examples.<br> <br>**27 to >24.0 ptsGood** The essay content aligns with the information requested and shows good mastery of the content. Provides sufficient information, however missed opportunities to demonstrate supporting details and/or examples.<br> <br>**24 to >21.0 ptsFair** The essay content aligns with the information requested and shows fair mastery of the content. Provides sufficient information, but lacks supporting details and/or examples.<br> <br>**21 to >18.0 ptsPoor** The essay content does not align with the information requested. Does not demonstrate mastery of the concepts.<br> <br>**18 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 30 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization<br>Structure of the Essay | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** The essay has a clear format, an introduction, a body with clear transitions between evidence and supporting arguments, and a conclusion. The information is presented in an orderly manner. All elements facilitate the flow of the information in the document.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** The essay has a clear format, an introduction, a body with evidence, supporting arguments, and a conclusion. All elements facilitate the flow of the information in the document, but the essay may miss transitions between sections or have other small organization issues.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** The essay structure is problematic, lacks logical flow, and has at least one of these issues: The essay does not have a clear introduction or conclusion, or the evidence and supporting arguments are not aligned with the requested requirements.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The essay does not appear to have any structure: no introduction, progression of thought, or defined conclusion.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking<br>Development of Ideas | **15 to >14.0 ptsExcellent** Details are considered, and a point of view, thesis statement, or main idea is clear. Next, the essay presents excellent evidence, arguments, and examples to support the point. Finally, the student draws meaningful and high-level insightful conclusions based on the information presented and explained.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsGood (12 -11 pts)** Details are considered, and a point of view, thesis statement, or main idea is clear. Next, the essay presents sufficient evidence, arguments, or examples to support the point. Finally, it draws appropriate conclusions based on the information presented and explained.<br> <br>**12 to >11.0 ptsFair** Details are considered, and a point of view, thesis statement, or main idea is identified. Next, the essay presents some evidence, arguments, or examples, but some are not relevant to support the point. Student draws fair conclusions, but not all are based on or supported by the presented information.<br> <br>**11 to >9.0 ptsPoor** Details are not considered, and a point of view, thesis statement, or main idea is exceptionally vague. The provided evidence, arguments, or examples are disconnected or not relevant. Additionally, the essay lacks a conclusion or repeats previous statements made.<br> <br>**9 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 15 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInformation Literacy<br>Quality of Resources | **15 to >14.0 ptsExcellent** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, up to date (depending on what is acceptable in the field), from credible and trusted sources, and the number of sources meets the requested amount.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsGood** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 1 source is not a credible and trusted source; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount.<br> <br>**12 to >11.0 ptsFair** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 2 or more sources are not credible and trusted sources; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount.<br> <br>**11 to >9.0 ptsPoor** The following criteria would apply, supporting information is not pertinent to the topic, none of the sources are from credible or trusted sources, or the number of sources requested was not met.<br> <br>**9 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** Resources did not reflect the requested outcomes, were off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 15 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting<br>Mechanics and Grammar | **10 to >9.0 ptsExcellent** Excellence in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure.<br> <br>**9 to >8.0 ptsGood** Minimal (1 – 3) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**8 to >7.0 ptsFair** Multiple (4 -7) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**7 to >5.0 ptsPoor** Severe (8 – 10) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**5 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** Unacceptable (11 or more) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 10 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormatting and APA Guidelines | **10 to >9.0 ptsExcellent** The essay reflects excellent execution and incorporation of APA guidelines. Correct formatting, setup, title page, perfect in-text citations, and reference formatting.<br> <br>**9 to >8.0 ptsGood** The essay offers correct formatting on the setup, and title page, with minimal formatting or punctuation errors within the in-text citations or references.<br> <br>**8 to >6.0 ptsFair** The essay offers correct formatting, setup, and title page but has significant errors within in-text citations and references.<br> <br>**6 to >5.0 ptsPoor** The essay offers severe incorrect APA formatting, setup or missing title page, and/or problematic in-text citations and references.<br> <br>**5 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** APA style not used and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 10 pts |

    Total Points: 100

    **## Module6.docx**

    **Module 6:** _Descriptive and Inferential Statistics: Identifying Them in Journals_

    **Instructions**

    Distinguish between the organization of articles by evidence level and organization of articles by clinical question (Essay). Please utilize Figure 1 John Hopkins Evidence Based-Practice Model for Nursing and Health Care Professionals.

    Once all the articles considered important to answer the clinical question have been gathered, the DNP should be able organize the articles by level of evidence and type of evidence.

    1. What is the purpose of the article organization?

    2. How do you compare the article organization by type of evidence vs the organization based on the type of clinical question?

    3. What is the best way to organize the studies when the organization is based on the clinical question?

    **Use an Essay Format**

    · You must present your writing double-spaced, in a Times New Roman, Arial or Courier New font, with a font size of 12.

    · Pay attention to grammar rules (spelling and syntax).

    · Your work must be original and must not contain material copied from books or the internet.

    · When citing the work of other authors, include citations and references using APA 7th style to respect their intellectual property and avoid plagiarism.

    · Remember that your writing must have a header or a cover page that includes the name of the institution, the program, the course code, the title of the activity, your name and student number, and the assignment's due date.

    Contribute a minimum of 5 pages. It should include at least 3 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

    Be sure to review the
    [academic expectations](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/1876/pages/expectations-and-best-practices-for-assignments) for your submission.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · Submit your assignment by 11:59 PM Eastern on the due date.

    · Review the rubric to determine how your assignment will be graded.

    · Your assignment will be run through Turnitin to check for plagiarism.

    ·
    [File Upload](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/44875/assignments/877917)

    ·
    [Studio](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/44875/assignments/877917)

    ·
    [Google Drive](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/44875/assignments/877917)

    ·
    [Office 365](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/44875/assignments/877917)

    Top of Form

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | Upload a file, or choose a file you've already uploaded. |
    | Drag a file here, or<br>Choose a file to upload |
    | | |
    | |
    | <="" div="" style="margin: 10px 0px;"><br>I agree to the tool's <br>[End-User License Agreement](https://agmu.turnitin.com/integrations/cpf/eula/agmu)<br>This assignment submission is my own, original work<br>* | |
    | |

    Bottom of Form

    Rubric

    **- Official Essay Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | – Official Essay Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent<br>Mastery of the Information | **30 to >27.0 ptsExcellent** The essay content properly aligns with the information requested and reflects student exemplary mastery of the content by showing complete information, details, and examples.<br> <br>**27 to >24.0 ptsGood** The essay content aligns with the information requested and shows good mastery of the content. Provides sufficient information, however missed opportunities to demonstrate supporting details and/or examples.<br> <br>**24 to >21.0 ptsFair** The essay content aligns with the information requested and shows fair mastery of the content. Provides sufficient information, but lacks supporting details and/or examples.<br> <br>**21 to >18.0 ptsPoor** The essay content does not align with the information requested. Does not demonstrate mastery of the concepts.<br> <br>**18 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 30 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization<br>Structure of the Essay | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** The essay has a clear format, an introduction, a body with clear transitions between evidence and supporting arguments, and a conclusion. The information is presented in an orderly manner. All elements facilitate the flow of the information in the document.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** The essay has a clear format, an introduction, a body with evidence, supporting arguments, and a conclusion. All elements facilitate the flow of the information in the document, but the essay may miss transitions between sections or have other small organization issues.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** The essay structure is problematic, lacks logical flow, and has at least one of these issues: The essay does not have a clear introduction or conclusion, or the evidence and supporting arguments are not aligned with the requested requirements.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The essay does not appear to have any structure: no introduction, progression of thought, or defined conclusion.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking<br>Development of Ideas | **15 to >14.0 ptsExcellent** Details are considered, and a point of view, thesis statement, or main idea is clear. Next, the essay presents excellent evidence, arguments, and examples to support the point. Finally, the student draws meaningful and high-level insightful conclusions based on the information presented and explained.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsGood (12 -11 pts)** Details are considered, and a point of view, thesis statement, or main idea is clear. Next, the essay presents sufficient evidence, arguments, or examples to support the point. Finally, it draws appropriate conclusions based on the information presented and explained.<br> <br>**12 to >11.0 ptsFair** Details are considered, and a point of view, thesis statement, or main idea is identified. Next, the essay presents some evidence, arguments, or examples, but some are not relevant to support the point. Student draws fair conclusions, but not all are based on or supported by the presented information.<br> <br>**11 to >9.0 ptsPoor** Details are not considered, and a point of view, thesis statement, or main idea is exceptionally vague. The provided evidence, arguments, or examples are disconnected or not relevant. Additionally, the essay lacks a conclusion or repeats previous statements made.<br> <br>**9 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 15 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInformation Literacy<br>Quality of Resources | **15 to >14.0 ptsExcellent** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, up to date (depending on what is acceptable in the field), from credible and trusted sources, and the number of sources meets the requested amount.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsGood** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 1 source is not a credible and trusted source; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount.<br> <br>**12 to >11.0 ptsFair** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 2 or more sources are not credible and trusted sources; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount.<br> <br>**11 to >9.0 ptsPoor** The following criteria would apply, supporting information is not pertinent to the topic, none of the sources are from credible or trusted sources, or the number of sources requested was not met.<br> <br>**9 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** Resources did not reflect the requested outcomes, were off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 15 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting<br>Mechanics and Grammar | **10 to >9.0 ptsExcellent** Excellence in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure.<br> <br>**9 to >8.0 ptsGood** Minimal (1 – 3) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**8 to >7.0 ptsFair** Multiple (4 -7) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**7 to >5.0 ptsPoor** Severe (8 – 10) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**5 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** Unacceptable (11 or more) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 10 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormatting and APA Guidelines | **10 to >9.0 ptsExcellent** The essay reflects excellent execution and incorporation of APA guidelines. Correct formatting, setup, title page, perfect in-text citations, and reference formatting.<br> <br>**9 to >8.0 ptsGood** The essay offers correct formatting on the setup, and title page, with minimal formatting or punctuation errors within the in-text citations or references.<br> <br>**8 to >6.0 ptsFair** The essay offers correct formatting, setup, and title page but has significant errors within in-text citations and references.<br> <br>**6 to >5.0 ptsPoor** The essay offers severe incorrect APA formatting, setup or missing title page, and/or problematic in-text citations and references.<br> <br>**5 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** APA style not used and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 10 pts |

    Total Points: 100

  • [Solved] Nursing Homework

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Nursing Homework.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] research

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering research.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.