[Solved] week 7

Assignment Prompt & Instructions

[>Operations Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-operations-management)

corporate ethical dilemma or fraud case of their choice

**files (2)**

– ## week7df.docx

– ## Week7-Assignment_FinalCoursePaper-MGMT618B002Winter2026-APEI.pdf

**## week7df.docx**

Students will write a comprehensive 12–15 page paper analyzing a major corporate ethical dilemma or fraud case of their choice. The paper should include identification of ethical issues, stakeholders, analysis using at least two ethical frameworks, evaluation of leadership and organizational culture impact, and recommendations for ethical strategies. Describe the impact of technological, structural, cultural, human, and environmental factors in the dilemma.

**Requirements:** Minimum 10 peer-reviewed sources, APA format, include executive summary and references.

**Note**: Please feel free to use an Artificial Intelligence (AI) platform for research assistance. As always, review the information for accuracy prior to submitting your paper and remember to cite the AI platform that was used.

**Be sure to review the following prior to submitting your assignment:**

· We strive for academic integrity in all aspects of education, and you are expected to uphold these standards when creating and submitting your discussion.  View the
[Standards of Student Conduct [webpage]](https://www.apu.apus.edu/student-handbook/university-policies-and-code-of-conduct/apus-student-code-of-conduct/standards-of-student-conduct/) for more information on what that means at APUS.

· Assignment Rubric

· If you do not see the rubric,
**select Course Tools in the blue horizontal navigation bar and then Assignments**. Select the appropriate assignment, and the rubric will be located near the bottom of the page.

·
[Print a Rubric Preview [webpage]](https://community.d2l.com/brightspace/kb/articles/5376-review-feedback-and-rubrics)

**## Week7-Assignment_FinalCoursePaper-MGMT618B002Winter2026-APEI.pdf**

MGMT Assignment GRADING RUBRIC (August

2021)
Course: MGMT618 B002 Winter 2026

Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning
Did not
attempt

Criterion
Score

Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning
Did not
attempt

Criterion
Score

Organizati

on of

Ideas/For

mat

/ 2525 points

Student

thoroughly

understands

and excels in

explaining all

major points.

An original,

unique,

and/or imag-

inative ap-

proach to

overall ideas,

concepts,

and findings

is presented.

Overall for-

mat of as-

signment in-

cludes an ap-

propriate in-

troduction,

well- devel-

oped para-

graphs, and a

conclusion.

Finished as-

signment

demon-

strates

student’s

ability to

plan and or-

ganize re-

search in a

logical se-

quence.

Student uses

21.25 points

Student ex-

plains the

majority of

points and

concepts in

the assign-

ment.

Learner

demon-

strates a

good skill

level in for-

matting and

organizing

material in

assignment.

Student

presents an

above aver-

age level of

prepared-

ness, with a

few format-

ting errors.

Student doc-

uments re-

quired num-

ber of out-

side

references.

18.75 points

Student ap-

plies some

points and

concepts in-

correctly.

Student uses

a variety of

formatting

styles, with

some incon-

sistencies

throughout

the paper.

Assignment

does not

have a con-

tinuous pat-

tern of logi-

cal sequenc-

ing.

Student has

fewer than

required ref-

erences and

does not use

them to vali-

date ideas.

16.25 points

Student has

numerous

formatting

errors and a

lack of orga-

nization.

Student

presents an

incomplete

attempt to

provide link-

ages or ex-

planation of

key terms.

There is little

to no at-

tempt to

document

outside ref-

erences as

required.

0 points

No

submission.

Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning
Did not
attempt

Criterion
Score

Content/S

ubject

Knowledg

e

/ 25

required out-

side refer-

ences

effectively.

25 points

Student

demon-

strates profi-

cient com-

mand of the

subject mat-

ter in the as-

signment.

Assignment

shows an im-

pressive

level of

depth of

student’s

ability to re-

late course

content to

practical ex-

amples and

applications.

Student pro-

vides com-

prehensive

analysis of

details, facts,

and concepts

in a logical

sequence

21.25 points

Student ex-

hibits above

average us-

age of sub-

ject matter

in assign-

ment.

Student pro-

vides above

average abil-

ity in relating

course con-

tent in exam-

ples given.

Details and

facts pre-

sented pro-

vide an ade-

quate pre-

sentation of

student’s

current level

of subject

matter

knowledge.

18.75 points

The assign-

ment reveals

that the stu-

dent has a

general, fun-

damental un-

derstanding

of the course

material.

There are ar-

eas of some

confusion in

the linkages

provided be-

tween facts

and support-

ing state-

ments.

Student ex-

plains con-

cepts, but

explains

them in a

manner that

may leave

the reader

confused in

some areas.

16.25 points

Student tries

to explain

some con-

cepts, but

overlooks

critical de-

tails.

Assignment

appears

vague or in-

complete in

various seg-

ments.

Student

presents

concepts in

isolation, and

does not

perceive to

have a logi-

cal sequenc-

ing of ideas.

0 points

No

submission.

Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning
Did not
attempt

Criterion
Score

Mechanic

s/APA

format-

ting

/ 2525 points

Student

demon-

strates an

excellent

command of

grammar, as

well as

presents re-

search in a

clear and

concise writ-

ing style.

Presents a

thorough,

extensive

understand-

ing of word

usage.

Assignment

is error-free

and

reflects

student’s

ability to

prepare a

high-quality

academic as-

signment

complete

with proper

APA

formatting.

21.25 points

Student pro-

vides an ef-

fective dis-

play of good

writing and

grammar.

Assignment

reflects

student’s

ability to se-

lect

appropriate

word usage

and present

an above av-

erage pre-

sentation of

the given

topic or is-

sue.

Assignment

appears to

be well writ-

ten with no

more than 3-

5 errors.

Student uses

proper APA

formatting

with only mi-

nor errors.

18.75 points

Student's

submission

reflects basic

writing and

grammar, but

includes

more than 5

errors. Key

terms and

concepts are

somewhat

vague and

not com-

pletely ex-

plained.

Student uses

only basic

vocabulary in

assignment.

Student’s

writing has

several APA

errors and

lacks proper

citation.

16.25 points

Student’s

writing style

is weak and

needs im-

provement,

and numer-

ous errors

are present.

Assignment

lacks clarity,

consistency,

and gram-

matical cor-

rectness.

Basic sen-

tence struc-

ture is often

confusing

and not

punctuated

properly.

Student pays

little or no

attention to

APA details

and there are

missing

citations.

0 points

No

submission.

Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning
Did not
attempt

Criterion
Score

Critical

Thinking

Skills

/ 2525 points

Student

demon-

strates a

higher-level

of critical

thinking ap-

propriate for

300-400

level cour-

ses. Learner

provides a

strategic ap-

proach in

presenting

examples of

problem

solving or

critical think-

ing, while

drawing logi-

cal conclu-

sions which

are not im-

mediately

obvious.

Student pro-

vides well-

supported

ideas and re-

flection with

a variety of

current

and/or world

views in the

assignment.

Student

presents a

21.25 points

Student ex-

hibits a good

command of

critical think-

ing skills in

the presen-

tation of ma-

terial and

supporting

statements.

Assignment

demon-

strates the

student’s

above aver-

age use of

relating con-

cepts by us-

ing a variety

of sources.

Overall, stu-

dent pro-

vides ade-

quate con-

clusions and

explains

them appro-

priately

throughout

the paper.

18.75 points

Student

takes a com-

mon, con-

ventional ap-

proach in

guiding the

reader

through vari-

ous linkages

and connec-

tions pre-

sented in as-

signment.

However,

student

presents a

limited per-

spective on

key concepts

throughout

assignment.

Student ap-

pears to

have prob-

lems apply-

ing informa-

tion in a

problem-

solving

manner.

16.25 points

Student

demon-

strates be-

ginning un-

derstanding

of key con-

cepts, but

overlooks

critical de-

tails. Learner

is unable to

apply infor-

mation in a

problem-

solving fash-

ion. Student

presents

confusing

statements

and facts

within the

assignment.

There is little

to no evi-

dence of

critical think-

ing skills.

0 points

No

submission

Total / 100

Overall Score

Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning
Did not
attempt

Criterion
Score

genuine in-

tellectual de-

velopment of

ideas

throughout

assignment.

Exemplary
90 points minimum

Accomplished
80 points minimum

Developing
70 points minimum

Beginning
60 points minimum

Did not attempt
0 points minimum

**## Week7-Assignment_FinalCoursePaper-MGMT618B002Winter2026-APEI.pdf**

MGMT Assignment GRADING RUBRIC (August

2021)
Course: MGMT618 B002 Winter 2026

Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning
Did not
attempt

Criterion
Score

Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning
Did not
attempt

Criterion
Score

Organizati

on of

Ideas/For

mat

/ 2525 points

Student

thoroughly

understands

and excels in

explaining all

major points.

An original,

unique,

and/or imag-

inative ap-

proach to

overall ideas,

concepts,

and findings

is presented.

Overall for-

mat of as-

signment in-

cludes an ap-

propriate in-

troduction,

well- devel-

oped para-

graphs, and a

conclusion.

Finished as-

signment

demon-

strates

student’s

ability to

plan and or-

ganize re-

search in a

logical se-

quence.

Student uses

21.25 points

Student ex-

plains the

majority of

points and

concepts in

the assign-

ment.

Learner

demon-

strates a

good skill

level in for-

matting and

organizing

material in

assignment.

Student

presents an

above aver-

age level of

prepared-

ness, with a

few format-

ting errors.

Student doc-

uments re-

quired num-

ber of out-

side

references.

18.75 points

Student ap-

plies some

points and

concepts in-

correctly.

Student uses

a variety of

formatting

styles, with

some incon-

sistencies

throughout

the paper.

Assignment

does not

have a con-

tinuous pat-

tern of logi-

cal sequenc-

ing.

Student has

fewer than

required ref-

erences and

does not use

them to vali-

date ideas.

16.25 points

Student has

numerous

formatting

errors and a

lack of orga-

nization.

Student

presents an

incomplete

attempt to

provide link-

ages or ex-

planation of

key terms.

There is little

to no at-

tempt to

document

outside ref-

erences as

required.

0 points

No

submission.

Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning
Did not
attempt

Criterion
Score

Content/S

ubject

Knowledg

e

/ 25

required out-

side refer-

ences

effectively.

25 points

Student

demon-

strates profi-

cient com-

mand of the

subject mat-

ter in the as-

signment.

Assignment

shows an im-

pressive

level of

depth of

student’s

ability to re-

late course

content to

practical ex-

amples and

applications.

Student pro-

vides com-

prehensive

analysis of

details, facts,

and concepts

in a logical

sequence

21.25 points

Student ex-

hibits above

average us-

age of sub-

ject matter

in assign-

ment.

Student pro-

vides above

average abil-

ity in relating

course con-

tent in exam-

ples given.

Details and

facts pre-

sented pro-

vide an ade-

quate pre-

sentation of

student’s

current level

of subject

matter

knowledge.

18.75 points

The assign-

ment reveals

that the stu-

dent has a

general, fun-

damental un-

derstanding

of the course

material.

There are ar-

eas of some

confusion in

the linkages

provided be-

tween facts

and support-

ing state-

ments.

Student ex-

plains con-

cepts, but

explains

them in a

manner that

may leave

the reader

confused in

some areas.

16.25 points

Student tries

to explain

some con-

cepts, but

overlooks

critical de-

tails.

Assignment

appears

vague or in-

complete in

various seg-

ments.

Student

presents

concepts in

isolation, and

does not

perceive to

have a logi-

cal sequenc-

ing of ideas.

0 points

No

submission.

Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning
Did not
attempt

Criterion
Score

Mechanic

s/APA

format-

ting

/ 2525 points

Student

demon-

strates an

excellent

command of

grammar, as

well as

presents re-

search in a

clear and

concise writ-

ing style.

Presents a

thorough,

extensive

understand-

ing of word

usage.

Assignment

is error-free

and

reflects

student’s

ability to

prepare a

high-quality

academic as-

signment

complete

with proper

APA

formatting.

21.25 points

Student pro-

vides an ef-

fective dis-

play of good

writing and

grammar.

Assignment

reflects

student’s

ability to se-

lect

appropriate

word usage

and present

an above av-

erage pre-

sentation of

the given

topic or is-

sue.

Assignment

appears to

be well writ-

ten with no

more than 3-

5 errors.

Student uses

proper APA

formatting

with only mi-

nor errors.

18.75 points

Student's

submission

reflects basic

writing and

grammar, but

includes

more than 5

errors. Key

terms and

concepts are

somewhat

vague and

not com-

pletely ex-

plained.

Student uses

only basic

vocabulary in

assignment.

Student’s

writing has

several APA

errors and

lacks proper

citation.

16.25 points

Student’s

writing style

is weak and

needs im-

provement,

and numer-

ous errors

are present.

Assignment

lacks clarity,

consistency,

and gram-

matical cor-

rectness.

Basic sen-

tence struc-

ture is often

confusing

and not

punctuated

properly.

Student pays

little or no

attention to

APA details

and there are

missing

citations.

0 points

No

submission.

Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning
Did not
attempt

Criterion
Score

Critical

Thinking

Skills

/ 2525 points

Student

demon-

strates a

higher-level

of critical

thinking ap-

propriate for

300-400

level cour-

ses. Learner

provides a

strategic ap-

proach in

presenting

examples of

problem

solving or

critical think-

ing, while

drawing logi-

cal conclu-

sions which

are not im-

mediately

obvious.

Student pro-

vides well-

supported

ideas and re-

flection with

a variety of

current

and/or world

views in the

assignment.

Student

presents a

21.25 points

Student ex-

hibits a good

command of

critical think-

ing skills in

the presen-

tation of ma-

terial and

supporting

statements.

Assignment

demon-

strates the

student’s

above aver-

age use of

relating con-

cepts by us-

ing a variety

of sources.

Overall, stu-

dent pro-

vides ade-

quate con-

clusions and

explains

them appro-

priately

throughout

the paper.

18.75 points

Student

takes a com-

mon, con-

ventional ap-

proach in

guiding the

reader

through vari-

ous linkages

and connec-

tions pre-

sented in as-

signment.

However,

student

presents a

limited per-

spective on

key concepts

throughout

assignment.

Student ap-

pears to

have prob-

lems apply-

ing informa-

tion in a

problem-

solving

manner.

16.25 points

Student

demon-

strates be-

ginning un-

derstanding

of key con-

cepts, but

overlooks

critical de-

tails. Learner

is unable to

apply infor-

mation in a

problem-

solving fash-

ion. Student

presents

confusing

statements

and facts

within the

assignment.

There is little

to no evi-

dence of

critical think-

ing skills.

0 points

No

submission

Total / 100

Overall Score

Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning
Did not
attempt

Criterion
Score

genuine in-

tellectual de-

velopment of

ideas

throughout

assignment.

Exemplary
90 points minimum

Accomplished
80 points minimum

Developing
70 points minimum

Beginning
60 points minimum

Did not attempt
0 points minimum

**## week7df.docx**

Students will write a comprehensive 12–15 page paper analyzing a major corporate ethical dilemma or fraud case of their choice. The paper should include identification of ethical issues, stakeholders, analysis using at least two ethical frameworks, evaluation of leadership and organizational culture impact, and recommendations for ethical strategies. Describe the impact of technological, structural, cultural, human, and environmental factors in the dilemma.

**Requirements:** Minimum 10 peer-reviewed sources, APA format, include executive summary and references.

**Note**: Please feel free to use an Artificial Intelligence (AI) platform for research assistance. As always, review the information for accuracy prior to submitting your paper and remember to cite the AI platform that was used.

**Be sure to review the following prior to submitting your assignment:**

· We strive for academic integrity in all aspects of education, and you are expected to uphold these standards when creating and submitting your discussion.  View the
[Standards of Student Conduct [webpage]](https://www.apu.apus.edu/student-handbook/university-policies-and-code-of-conduct/apus-student-code-of-conduct/standards-of-student-conduct/) for more information on what that means at APUS.

· Assignment Rubric

· If you do not see the rubric,
**select Course Tools in the blue horizontal navigation bar and then Assignments**. Select the appropriate assignment, and the rubric will be located near the bottom of the page.

·
[Print a Rubric Preview [webpage]](https://community.d2l.com/brightspace/kb/articles/5376-review-feedback-and-rubrics)

**## Week7-Assignment_FinalCoursePaper-MGMT618B002Winter2026-APEI.pdf**

MGMT Assignment GRADING RUBRIC (August

2021)
Course: MGMT618 B002 Winter 2026

Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning
Did not
attempt

Criterion
Score

Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning
Did not
attempt

Criterion
Score

Organizati

on of

Ideas/For

mat

/ 2525 points

Student

thoroughly

understands

and excels in

explaining all

major points.

An original,

unique,

and/or imag-

inative ap-

proach to

overall ideas,

concepts,

and findings

is presented.

Overall for-

mat of as-

signment in-

cludes an ap-

propriate in-

troduction,

well- devel-

oped para-

graphs, and a

conclusion.

Finished as-

signment

demon-

strates

student’s

ability to

plan and or-

ganize re-

search in a

logical se-

quence.

Student uses

21.25 points

Student ex-

plains the

majority of

points and

concepts in

the assign-

ment.

Learner

demon-

strates a

good skill

level in for-

matting and

organizing

material in

assignment.

Student

presents an

above aver-

age level of

prepared-

ness, with a

few format-

ting errors.

Student doc-

uments re-

quired num-

ber of out-

side

references.

18.75 points

Student ap-

plies some

points and

concepts in-

correctly.

Student uses

a variety of

formatting

styles, with

some incon-

sistencies

throughout

the paper.

Assignment

does not

have a con-

tinuous pat-

tern of logi-

cal sequenc-

ing.

Student has

fewer than

required ref-

erences and

does not use

them to vali-

date ideas.

16.25 points

Student has

numerous

formatting

errors and a

lack of orga-

nization.

Student

presents an

incomplete

attempt to

provide link-

ages or ex-

planation of

key terms.

There is little

to no at-

tempt to

document

outside ref-

erences as

required.

0 points

No

submission.

Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning
Did not
attempt

Criterion
Score

Content/S

ubject

Knowledg

e

/ 25

required out-

side refer-

ences

effectively.

25 points

Student

demon-

strates profi-

cient com-

mand of the

subject mat-

ter in the as-

signment.

Assignment

shows an im-

pressive

level of

depth of

student’s

ability to re-

late course

content to

practical ex-

amples and

applications.

Student pro-

vides com-

prehensive

analysis of

details, facts,

and concepts

in a logical

sequence

21.25 points

Student ex-

hibits above

average us-

age of sub-

ject matter

in assign-

ment.

Student pro-

vides above

average abil-

ity in relating

course con-

tent in exam-

ples given.

Details and

facts pre-

sented pro-

vide an ade-

quate pre-

sentation of

student’s

current level

of subject

matter

knowledge.

18.75 points

The assign-

ment reveals

that the stu-

dent has a

general, fun-

damental un-

derstanding

of the course

material.

There are ar-

eas of some

confusion in

the linkages

provided be-

tween facts

and support-

ing state-

ments.

Student ex-

plains con-

cepts, but

explains

them in a

manner that

may leave

the reader

confused in

some areas.

16.25 points

Student tries

to explain

some con-

cepts, but

overlooks

critical de-

tails.

Assignment

appears

vague or in-

complete in

various seg-

ments.

Student

presents

concepts in

isolation, and

does not

perceive to

have a logi-

cal sequenc-

ing of ideas.

0 points

No

submission.

Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning
Did not
attempt

Criterion
Score

Mechanic

s/APA

format-

ting

/ 2525 points

Student

demon-

strates an

excellent

command of

grammar, as

well as

presents re-

search in a

clear and

concise writ-

ing style.

Presents a

thorough,

extensive

understand-

ing of word

usage.

Assignment

is error-free

and

reflects

student’s

ability to

prepare a

high-quality

academic as-

signment

complete

with proper

APA

formatting.

21.25 points

Student pro-

vides an ef-

fective dis-

play of good

writing and

grammar.

Assignment

reflects

student’s

ability to se-

lect

appropriate

word usage

and present

an above av-

erage pre-

sentation of

the given

topic or is-

sue.

Assignment

appears to

be well writ-

ten with no

more than 3-

5 errors.

Student uses

proper APA

formatting

with only mi-

nor errors.

18.75 points

Student's

submission

reflects basic

writing and

grammar, but

includes

more than 5

errors. Key

terms and

concepts are

somewhat

vague and

not com-

pletely ex-

plained.

Student uses

only basic

vocabulary in

assignment.

Student’s

writing has

several APA

errors and

lacks proper

citation.

16.25 points

Student’s

writing style

is weak and

needs im-

provement,

and numer-

ous errors

are present.

Assignment

lacks clarity,

consistency,

and gram-

matical cor-

rectness.

Basic sen-

tence struc-

ture is often

confusing

and not

punctuated

properly.

Student pays

little or no

attention to

APA details

and there are

missing

citations.

0 points

No

submission.

Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning
Did not
attempt

Criterion
Score

Critical

Thinking

Skills

/ 2525 points

Student

demon-

strates a

higher-level

of critical

thinking ap-

propriate for

300-400

level cour-

ses. Learner

provides a

strategic ap-

proach in

presenting

examples of

problem

solving or

critical think-

ing, while

drawing logi-

cal conclu-

sions which

are not im-

mediately

obvious.

Student pro-

vides well-

supported

ideas and re-

flection with

a variety of

current

and/or world

views in the

assignment.

Student

presents a

21.25 points

Student ex-

hibits a good

command of

critical think-

ing skills in

the presen-

tation of ma-

terial and

supporting

statements.

Assignment

demon-

strates the

student’s

above aver-

age use of

relating con-

cepts by us-

ing a variety

of sources.

Overall, stu-

dent pro-

vides ade-

quate con-

clusions and

explains

them appro-

priately

throughout

the paper.

18.75 points

Student

takes a com-

mon, con-

ventional ap-

proach in

guiding the

reader

through vari-

ous linkages

and connec-

tions pre-

sented in as-

signment.

However,

student

presents a

limited per-

spective on

key concepts

throughout

assignment.

Student ap-

pears to

have prob-

lems apply-

ing informa-

tion in a

problem-

solving

manner.

16.25 points

Student

demon-

strates be-

ginning un-

derstanding

of key con-

cepts, but

overlooks

critical de-

tails. Learner

is unable to

apply infor-

mation in a

problem-

solving fash-

ion. Student

presents

confusing

statements

and facts

within the

assignment.

There is little

to no evi-

dence of

critical think-

ing skills.

0 points

No

submission

Total / 100

Overall Score

Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning
Did not
attempt

Criterion
Score

genuine in-

tellectual de-

velopment of

ideas

throughout

assignment.

Exemplary
90 points minimum

Accomplished
80 points minimum

Developing
70 points minimum

Beginning
60 points minimum

Did not attempt
0 points minimum

**## week7df.docx**

Students will write a comprehensive 12–15 page paper analyzing a major corporate ethical dilemma or fraud case of their choice. The paper should include identification of ethical issues, stakeholders, analysis using at least two ethical frameworks, evaluation of leadership and organizational culture impact, and recommendations for ethical strategies. Describe the impact of technological, structural, cultural, human, and environmental factors in the dilemma.

**Requirements:** Minimum 10 peer-reviewed sources, APA format, include executive summary and references.

**Note**: Please feel free to use an Artificial Intelligence (AI) platform for research assistance. As always, review the information for accuracy prior to submitting your paper and remember to cite the AI platform that was used.

**Be sure to review the following prior to submitting your assignment:**

· We strive for academic integrity in all aspects of education, and you are expected to uphold these standards when creating and submitting your discussion.  View the
[Standards of Student Conduct [webpage]](https://www.apu.apus.edu/student-handbook/university-policies-and-code-of-conduct/apus-student-code-of-conduct/standards-of-student-conduct/) for more information on what that means at APUS.

· Assignment Rubric

· If you do not see the rubric,
**select Course Tools in the blue horizontal navigation bar and then Assignments**. Select the appropriate assignment, and the rubric will be located near the bottom of the page.

·
[Print a Rubric Preview [webpage]](https://community.d2l.com/brightspace/kb/articles/5376-review-feedback-and-rubrics)

**## Week7-Assignment_FinalCoursePaper-MGMT618B002Winter2026-APEI.pdf**

MGMT Assignment GRADING RUBRIC (August

2021)
Course: MGMT618 B002 Winter 2026

Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning
Did not
attempt

Criterion
Score

Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning
Did not
attempt

Criterion
Score

Organizati

on of

Ideas/For

mat

/ 2525 points

Student

thoroughly

understands

and excels in

explaining all

major points.

An original,

unique,

and/or imag-

inative ap-

proach to

overall ideas,

concepts,

and findings

is presented.

Overall for-

mat of as-

signment in-

cludes an ap-

propriate in-

troduction,

well- devel-

oped para-

graphs, and a

conclusion.

Finished as-

signment

demon-

strates

student’s

ability to

plan and or-

ganize re-

search in a

logical se-

quence.

Student uses

21.25 points

Student ex-

plains the

majority of

points and

concepts in

the assign-

ment.

Learner

demon-

strates a

good skill

level in for-

matting and

organizing

material in

assignment.

Student

presents an

above aver-

age level of

prepared-

ness, with a

few format-

ting errors.

Student doc-

uments re-

quired num-

ber of out-

side

references.

18.75 points

Student ap-

plies some

points and

concepts in-

correctly.

Student uses

a variety of

formatting

styles, with

some incon-

sistencies

throughout

the paper.

Assignment

does not

have a con-

tinuous pat-

tern of logi-

cal sequenc-

ing.

Student has

fewer than

required ref-

erences and

does not use

them to vali-

date ideas.

16.25 points

Student has

numerous

formatting

errors and a

lack of orga-

nization.

Student

presents an

incomplete

attempt to

provide link-

ages or ex-

planation of

key terms.

There is little

to no at-

tempt to

document

outside ref-

erences as

required.

0 points

No

submission.

Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning
Did not
attempt

Criterion
Score

Content/S

ubject

Knowledg

e

/ 25

required out-

side refer-

ences

effectively.

25 points

Student

demon-

strates profi-

cient com-

mand of the

subject mat-

ter in the as-

signment.

Assignment

shows an im-

pressive

level of

depth of

student’s

ability to re-

late course

content to

practical ex-

amples and

applications.

Student pro-

vides com-

prehensive

analysis of

details, facts,

and concepts

in a logical

sequence

21.25 points

Student ex-

hibits above

average us-

age of sub-

ject matter

in assign-

ment.

Student pro-

vides above

average abil-

ity in relating

course con-

tent in exam-

ples given.

Details and

facts pre-

sented pro-

vide an ade-

quate pre-

sentation of

student’s

current level

of subject

matter

knowledge.

18.75 points

The assign-

ment reveals

that the stu-

dent has a

general, fun-

damental un-

derstanding

of the course

material.

There are ar-

eas of some

confusion in

the linkages

provided be-

tween facts

and support-

ing state-

ments.

Student ex-

plains con-

cepts, but

explains

them in a

manner that

may leave

the reader

confused in

some areas.

16.25 points

Student tries

to explain

some con-

cepts, but

overlooks

critical de-

tails.

Assignment

appears

vague or in-

complete in

various seg-

ments.

Student

presents

concepts in

isolation, and

does not

perceive to

have a logi-

cal sequenc-

ing of ideas.

0 points

No

submission.

Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning
Did not
attempt

Criterion
Score

Mechanic

s/APA

format-

ting

/ 2525 points

Student

demon-

strates an

excellent

command of

grammar, as

well as

presents re-

search in a

clear and

concise writ-

ing style.

Presents a

thorough,

extensive

understand-

ing of word

usage.

Assignment

is error-free

and

reflects

student’s

ability to

prepare a

high-quality

academic as-

signment

complete

with proper

APA

formatting.

21.25 points

Student pro-

vides an ef-

fective dis-

play of good

writing and

grammar.

Assignment

reflects

student’s

ability to se-

lect

appropriate

word usage

and present

an above av-

erage pre-

sentation of

the given

topic or is-

sue.

Assignment

appears to

be well writ-

ten with no

more than 3-

5 errors.

Student uses

proper APA

formatting

with only mi-

nor errors.

18.75 points

Student's

submission

reflects basic

writing and

grammar, but

includes

more than 5

errors. Key

terms and

concepts are

somewhat

vague and

not com-

pletely ex-

plained.

Student uses

only basic

vocabulary in

assignment.

Student’s

writing has

several APA

errors and

lacks proper

citation.

16.25 points

Student’s

writing style

is weak and

needs im-

provement,

and numer-

ous errors

are present.

Assignment

lacks clarity,

consistency,

and gram-

matical cor-

rectness.

Basic sen-

tence struc-

ture is often

confusing

and not

punctuated

properly.

Student pays

little or no

attention to

APA details

and there are

missing

citations.

0 points

No

submission.

Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning
Did not
attempt

Criterion
Score

Critical

Thinking

Skills

/ 2525 points

Student

demon-

strates a

higher-level

of critical

thinking ap-

propriate for

300-400

level cour-

ses. Learner

provides a

strategic ap-

proach in

presenting

examples of

problem

solving or

critical think-

ing, while

drawing logi-

cal conclu-

sions which

are not im-

mediately

obvious.

Student pro-

vides well-

supported

ideas and re-

flection with

a variety of

current

and/or world

views in the

assignment.

Student

presents a

21.25 points

Student ex-

hibits a good

command of

critical think-

ing skills in

the presen-

tation of ma-

terial and

supporting

statements.

Assignment

demon-

strates the

student’s

above aver-

age use of

relating con-

cepts by us-

ing a variety

of sources.

Overall, stu-

dent pro-

vides ade-

quate con-

clusions and

explains

them appro-

priately

throughout

the paper.

18.75 points

Student

takes a com-

mon, con-

ventional ap-

proach in

guiding the

reader

through vari-

ous linkages

and connec-

tions pre-

sented in as-

signment.

However,

student

presents a

limited per-

spective on

key concepts

throughout

assignment.

Student ap-

pears to

have prob-

lems apply-

ing informa-

tion in a

problem-

solving

manner.

16.25 points

Student

demon-

strates be-

ginning un-

derstanding

of key con-

cepts, but

overlooks

critical de-

tails. Learner

is unable to

apply infor-

mation in a

problem-

solving fash-

ion. Student

presents

confusing

statements

and facts

within the

assignment.

There is little

to no evi-

dence of

critical think-

ing skills.

0 points

No

submission

Total / 100

Overall Score

Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning
Did not
attempt

Criterion
Score

genuine in-

tellectual de-

velopment of

ideas

throughout

assignment.

Exemplary
90 points minimum

Accomplished
80 points minimum

Developing
70 points minimum

Beginning
60 points minimum

Did not attempt
0 points minimum