Assignment Prompt & Instructions
**files (1)**
– ## LeadershipStyleAnalysis.docx
**## LeadershipStyleAnalysis.docx**
**Assignment Overview**
1.
[Leadership Style Analysis](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/44425/assignments/880662)
Leadership is essential in advanced practice nursing. Nurse Practitioners lead through communication, clinical decision-making, teamwork, advocacy, and systems improvement. In this assignment, you will analyze leadership through real-world observation and self-reflection.
You will:
1. Describe and analyze an
**effective leader**
2. Describe and analyze an
**ineffective leader**
3. Reflect on and evaluate
**your own leadership style**, including improvement planning
**Learning Objectives**
By completing this assignment, students will be able to:
· Identify characteristics of effective and ineffective leadership in healthcare settings
· Analyze leadership behaviors using leadership concepts
· Reflect on personal leadership strengths and growth opportunities
· Create an action plan to improve professional leadership skills as a future FNP
**Student Instructions:**
**Part 1: Analyze an Effective Leader**
Choose a leader you believe is effective (healthcare or non-healthcare). This may include:
· Nurse manager, charge nurse, NP leader, physician leader
· Faculty member, administrator, team leader
· Community leader or organizational leader
Include:
· The leader’s role (do not include identifying personal details)
· Setting/context where you observed their leadership
· Behaviors that make them effective
· Leadership style you believe they demonstrate (examples: transformational, servant leadership, democratic, coaching, etc.)
· How their leadership impacts team performance, patient outcomes, or workplace culture
**Part 2: Analyze an Ineffective Leader**
Choose a leader you believe is ineffective (healthcare or non-healthcare). You do not need to name them—protect confidentiality.
Include:
· The leader’s role and context (no names or identifiers)
· Behaviors that make their leadership ineffective
· Leadership style (or lack of style/skills) demonstrated
· Impact on teamwork, safety, morale, communication, or quality of care
· What could have been done differently to improve their leadership effectiveness
**Part 3: Self-Reflection — Your Leadership Style**
Reflect on your own leadership behaviors and development.
Address both of the following:
–
**What you wish your leadership style was** (ideal leadership)
–
**What you actually do** (real habits, patterns, strengths, weaknesses)
Include:
· Your leadership strengths
· Areas you need to improve
· How your current leadership approach affects teamwork, communication, or conflict
· How you can grow into an advanced practice leadership role as a future FNP
**Part 4: Leadership Improvement Plan**
Develop a realistic plan to improve your leadership style.
Your plan must include:
·
**At least 3 specific strategies** (example: improving communication, delegation, conflict resolution, emotional intelligence, time management, feedback skills, accountability, etc.)
· A timeline or clear next steps (example: “in the next 4 weeks I will…”)
· How you will measure improvement (examples: feedback from peers/preceptor, journaling, self-assessment tools)
**Paper Requirements (APA 7th Edition)**
Your paper must meet the following:
·
**Minimum length:** 3
**full pages** (not including title page and references)
·
**APA format:** Title page, headings (recommended), in-text citations, and reference list
·
**Double-spaced**, Times New Roman 12-point font, 1-inch margins
· Include
**at least 2 scholarly sources** (peer-reviewed journal articles or academic textbooks)
· Maintain
**professional tone** and clear organization
**Confidentiality Reminder**
Do not include names of facilities, staff, or leadership members. Use descriptions such as:
· “A nurse manager in an outpatient clinic”
· “A charge nurse on a medical-surgical unit”
**Submission Instructions**
Submit your assignment in Canvas as a
**Word (.doc/.docx)** or
**PDF** file by the posted deadline.
**Leadership Style Analysis Rubric**
| | | |
| — | — | — |
| Leadership Style Analysis Rubric |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEffective Leader Description & Leadership Style Analysis<br>Student clearly describes an effective leader and analyzes their leadership style using leadership concepts and examples. | **25 ptsStrong Effective Leader Analysis** Provides a detailed description of an effective leader with clear leadership style identification, strong evidence/examples, and meaningful impact analysis.<br> <br>**20 ptsClear Effective Leader Analysis** Describes and analyzes an effective leader appropriately; leadership style is identified with examples, but depth may be moderate.<br> <br>**15 ptsLimited Effective Leader Analysis** Basic description provided; leadership style is unclear or weakly supported with limited analysis of impact.<br> <br>**8 ptsWeak Effective Leader Analysis** Minimal detail; leadership style not clearly identified; lacks meaningful examples or analysis.<br> <br>**0 ptsMissing** Effective leader section not included. | 25 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIneffective Leader Description & Leadership Style Analysis<br>Student clearly describes an ineffective leader and analyzes leadership behaviors and their negative impact on outcomes or workplace culture. | **25 ptsStrong Ineffective Leader Analysis** Provides a clear and detailed description of ineffective leadership with strong analysis of behaviors and consequences; includes thoughtful improvement suggestions.<br> <br>**20 ptsclear Ineffective Leader Analysis** Describes ineffective leadership and impact with appropriate detail; improvement suggestions included but may lack depth.<br> <br>**15 ptsLimited Ineffective Leader Analysis** Ineffective leader described but analysis is vague; limited connection to consequences or improvement strategies.<br> <br>**8 ptsWeak Ineffective Leader Analysis** Minimal explanation; unclear leadership behaviors or impact; lacks analysis.<br> <br>**0 ptsMissing** Ineffective leader section not included. | 25 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSelf-Reflection on Personal Leadership Style<br>Student reflects on personal leadership strengths, weaknesses, ideal vs actual leadership behaviors, and professional growth. | **20 ptsInsightful Self-Reflection** Reflection is thoughtful, honest, and detailed; clearly compares ideal vs actual leadership style and demonstrates strong professional insight.<br> <br>**16 ptsClear Self-Reflection** Reflection is meaningful and organized; identifies strengths and areas for growth with moderate depth.<br> <br>**12 ptsBasic Self-Reflection** Reflection is present but surface-level; limited comparison of ideal vs actual leadership behaviors.<br> <br>**6 ptsMinimal Self-Reflection** Reflection is unclear or very brief; lacks professional insight.<br> <br>**0 ptsMissing** Self-reflection section not included. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLeadership Improvement Plan & Action Steps<br>Student develops a realistic improvement plan with strategies, next steps, and methods for evaluating progress. | **20 ptsStrong Improvement Plan** ncludes 3+ specific strategies, clear next steps/timeline, and measurable goals; plan is realistic and relevant to FNP practice.<br> <br>**15 ptsEffective Improvement Plan** Includes strategies and next steps; plan is realistic but lacks detail on measurement or timeline.<br> <br>**10 ptsBasic Improvement Plan** Plan is included but strategies are vague or not clearly measurable; limited detail.<br> <br>**5 ptsWeak Improvement Plan** Minimal plan; lacks specific strategies or actionable steps.<br> <br>**0 ptsMissing** No improvement plan provided. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Format, Organization & Writing Quality<br>Paper is well organized, meets minimum length requirements, uses professional writing, and follows APA 7th edition formatting (including citations and references). | **10 ptsProfessional Writing + Correct APA** Paper is well organized, meets length requirement, and writing is clear and professional. APA formatting is correct with accurate in-text citations and reference list.<br> <br>**8 ptsMinor APA/Writing Issues** Paper meets length requirement and is organized; minor APA or writing errors present but do not reduce clarity.<br> <br>**6 ptsSeveral APA/Writing Issues** Organization or writing issues affect readability; APA formatting has repeated errors OR minimum length is barely met.<br> <br>**3 ptsSignificant APA/Writing Problems** Frequent writing errors; APA formatting is poor or inconsistent; paper may not meet the minimum length requirement.<br> <br>**0 ptsUnacceptable / Not Submitted** Paper not submitted OR does not meet basic requirements (length, organization, APA). | 10 pts |
Total Points: 100
**## LeadershipStyleAnalysis.docx**
**Assignment Overview**
1.
[Leadership Style Analysis](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/44425/assignments/880662)
Leadership is essential in advanced practice nursing. Nurse Practitioners lead through communication, clinical decision-making, teamwork, advocacy, and systems improvement. In this assignment, you will analyze leadership through real-world observation and self-reflection.
You will:
1. Describe and analyze an
**effective leader**
2. Describe and analyze an
**ineffective leader**
3. Reflect on and evaluate
**your own leadership style**, including improvement planning
**Learning Objectives**
By completing this assignment, students will be able to:
· Identify characteristics of effective and ineffective leadership in healthcare settings
· Analyze leadership behaviors using leadership concepts
· Reflect on personal leadership strengths and growth opportunities
· Create an action plan to improve professional leadership skills as a future FNP
**Student Instructions:**
**Part 1: Analyze an Effective Leader**
Choose a leader you believe is effective (healthcare or non-healthcare). This may include:
· Nurse manager, charge nurse, NP leader, physician leader
· Faculty member, administrator, team leader
· Community leader or organizational leader
Include:
· The leader’s role (do not include identifying personal details)
· Setting/context where you observed their leadership
· Behaviors that make them effective
· Leadership style you believe they demonstrate (examples: transformational, servant leadership, democratic, coaching, etc.)
· How their leadership impacts team performance, patient outcomes, or workplace culture
**Part 2: Analyze an Ineffective Leader**
Choose a leader you believe is ineffective (healthcare or non-healthcare). You do not need to name them—protect confidentiality.
Include:
· The leader’s role and context (no names or identifiers)
· Behaviors that make their leadership ineffective
· Leadership style (or lack of style/skills) demonstrated
· Impact on teamwork, safety, morale, communication, or quality of care
· What could have been done differently to improve their leadership effectiveness
**Part 3: Self-Reflection — Your Leadership Style**
Reflect on your own leadership behaviors and development.
Address both of the following:
–
**What you wish your leadership style was** (ideal leadership)
–
**What you actually do** (real habits, patterns, strengths, weaknesses)
Include:
· Your leadership strengths
· Areas you need to improve
· How your current leadership approach affects teamwork, communication, or conflict
· How you can grow into an advanced practice leadership role as a future FNP
**Part 4: Leadership Improvement Plan**
Develop a realistic plan to improve your leadership style.
Your plan must include:
·
**At least 3 specific strategies** (example: improving communication, delegation, conflict resolution, emotional intelligence, time management, feedback skills, accountability, etc.)
· A timeline or clear next steps (example: “in the next 4 weeks I will…”)
· How you will measure improvement (examples: feedback from peers/preceptor, journaling, self-assessment tools)
**Paper Requirements (APA 7th Edition)**
Your paper must meet the following:
·
**Minimum length:** 3
**full pages** (not including title page and references)
·
**APA format:** Title page, headings (recommended), in-text citations, and reference list
·
**Double-spaced**, Times New Roman 12-point font, 1-inch margins
· Include
**at least 2 scholarly sources** (peer-reviewed journal articles or academic textbooks)
· Maintain
**professional tone** and clear organization
**Confidentiality Reminder**
Do not include names of facilities, staff, or leadership members. Use descriptions such as:
· “A nurse manager in an outpatient clinic”
· “A charge nurse on a medical-surgical unit”
**Submission Instructions**
Submit your assignment in Canvas as a
**Word (.doc/.docx)** or
**PDF** file by the posted deadline.
**Leadership Style Analysis Rubric**
| | | |
| — | — | — |
| Leadership Style Analysis Rubric |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEffective Leader Description & Leadership Style Analysis<br>Student clearly describes an effective leader and analyzes their leadership style using leadership concepts and examples. | **25 ptsStrong Effective Leader Analysis** Provides a detailed description of an effective leader with clear leadership style identification, strong evidence/examples, and meaningful impact analysis.<br> <br>**20 ptsClear Effective Leader Analysis** Describes and analyzes an effective leader appropriately; leadership style is identified with examples, but depth may be moderate.<br> <br>**15 ptsLimited Effective Leader Analysis** Basic description provided; leadership style is unclear or weakly supported with limited analysis of impact.<br> <br>**8 ptsWeak Effective Leader Analysis** Minimal detail; leadership style not clearly identified; lacks meaningful examples or analysis.<br> <br>**0 ptsMissing** Effective leader section not included. | 25 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIneffective Leader Description & Leadership Style Analysis<br>Student clearly describes an ineffective leader and analyzes leadership behaviors and their negative impact on outcomes or workplace culture. | **25 ptsStrong Ineffective Leader Analysis** Provides a clear and detailed description of ineffective leadership with strong analysis of behaviors and consequences; includes thoughtful improvement suggestions.<br> <br>**20 ptsclear Ineffective Leader Analysis** Describes ineffective leadership and impact with appropriate detail; improvement suggestions included but may lack depth.<br> <br>**15 ptsLimited Ineffective Leader Analysis** Ineffective leader described but analysis is vague; limited connection to consequences or improvement strategies.<br> <br>**8 ptsWeak Ineffective Leader Analysis** Minimal explanation; unclear leadership behaviors or impact; lacks analysis.<br> <br>**0 ptsMissing** Ineffective leader section not included. | 25 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSelf-Reflection on Personal Leadership Style<br>Student reflects on personal leadership strengths, weaknesses, ideal vs actual leadership behaviors, and professional growth. | **20 ptsInsightful Self-Reflection** Reflection is thoughtful, honest, and detailed; clearly compares ideal vs actual leadership style and demonstrates strong professional insight.<br> <br>**16 ptsClear Self-Reflection** Reflection is meaningful and organized; identifies strengths and areas for growth with moderate depth.<br> <br>**12 ptsBasic Self-Reflection** Reflection is present but surface-level; limited comparison of ideal vs actual leadership behaviors.<br> <br>**6 ptsMinimal Self-Reflection** Reflection is unclear or very brief; lacks professional insight.<br> <br>**0 ptsMissing** Self-reflection section not included. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLeadership Improvement Plan & Action Steps<br>Student develops a realistic improvement plan with strategies, next steps, and methods for evaluating progress. | **20 ptsStrong Improvement Plan** ncludes 3+ specific strategies, clear next steps/timeline, and measurable goals; plan is realistic and relevant to FNP practice.<br> <br>**15 ptsEffective Improvement Plan** Includes strategies and next steps; plan is realistic but lacks detail on measurement or timeline.<br> <br>**10 ptsBasic Improvement Plan** Plan is included but strategies are vague or not clearly measurable; limited detail.<br> <br>**5 ptsWeak Improvement Plan** Minimal plan; lacks specific strategies or actionable steps.<br> <br>**0 ptsMissing** No improvement plan provided. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Format, Organization & Writing Quality<br>Paper is well organized, meets minimum length requirements, uses professional writing, and follows APA 7th edition formatting (including citations and references). | **10 ptsProfessional Writing + Correct APA** Paper is well organized, meets length requirement, and writing is clear and professional. APA formatting is correct with accurate in-text citations and reference list.<br> <br>**8 ptsMinor APA/Writing Issues** Paper meets length requirement and is organized; minor APA or writing errors present but do not reduce clarity.<br> <br>**6 ptsSeveral APA/Writing Issues** Organization or writing issues affect readability; APA formatting has repeated errors OR minimum length is barely met.<br> <br>**3 ptsSignificant APA/Writing Problems** Frequent writing errors; APA formatting is poor or inconsistent; paper may not meet the minimum length requirement.<br> <br>**0 ptsUnacceptable / Not Submitted** Paper not submitted OR does not meet basic requirements (length, organization, APA). | 10 pts |
Total Points: 100