Author: admin

  • [Solved] HW Help

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering HW Help.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] BUSINESS( NO PLAGARISM A+ WORK, ON TIME)

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-management) discussion tutor 2 reerences **files (1)** – ## week8ArtificialIntelligence.docx **## week8ArtificialIntelligence.docx** [With Artificial Intelligence, Philosophy of Mind Has Become an Experimental Science | …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-management)

    discussion tutor 2 reerences

    **files (1)**

    – ## week8ArtificialIntelligence.docx

    **## week8ArtificialIntelligence.docx**

    [With Artificial Intelligence, Philosophy of Mind Has Become an Experimental Science | by Casper Wilstrup | Machine Consciousness | Medium](https://medium.com/machine-cognition/with-artificial-intelligence-philosophy-of-mind-has-become-an-experimental-science-e0b79dc6601a)

    [The Future of the World (2030 to 10,000 A.D.+): 130 Future Technologies – YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5VuW76Bc5Mw)

    [Quantum Computing and Its Impact on AI](https://www.neilsahota.com/quantum-computing-and-its-impact-on-ai-unlocking-limitless-potential/)

    **Discussion (No more than 300 words)**

    1. Which concepts presented in this course were most important or beneficial to you personally and professionally?

    2. Where is AI taking business and society? You have reviewed Learning Materials that present dystopian vs. utopian predictions of the advance of AI. Which direction do you foresee is the more likely or realistic prediction? Explain.

    **## week8ArtificialIntelligence.docx**

    [With Artificial Intelligence, Philosophy of Mind Has Become an Experimental Science | by Casper Wilstrup | Machine Consciousness | Medium](https://medium.com/machine-cognition/with-artificial-intelligence-philosophy-of-mind-has-become-an-experimental-science-e0b79dc6601a)

    [The Future of the World (2030 to 10,000 A.D.+): 130 Future Technologies – YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5VuW76Bc5Mw)

    [Quantum Computing and Its Impact on AI](https://www.neilsahota.com/quantum-computing-and-its-impact-on-ai-unlocking-limitless-potential/)

    **Discussion (No more than 300 words)**

    1. Which concepts presented in this course were most important or beneficial to you personally and professionally?

    2. Where is AI taking business and society? You have reviewed Learning Materials that present dystopian vs. utopian predictions of the advance of AI. Which direction do you foresee is the more likely or realistic prediction? Explain.

  • [Solved] case study

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    You will also have to document the complete head to toe assessment with at least 2 care plans in a written report. APA format required using 7th edition professional edition. Encourage using evidence-based guidelines and current literature to support the care plan.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    You will also have to document the complete head to toe assessment with at least 2 care plans in a written report. APA format required using 7th edition professional edition.

    Encourage using evidence-based guidelines and current literature to support the care plan.

  • [Solved] Psychology Assignment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Please follow instructions, No AI Or ChatGPT's. Please do a good job. Let me what is needed. **files (1)** – ## Week1_Assignment9.pdf **## Week1_Assignment9.pdf** Due Sunday by 10:59pm Points 90 Submitting a text entry box or a file upload Attempts 0 Allowed Attempts 2 Start Assignment  Back to W…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Please follow instructions, No AI Or ChatGPT's. Please do a good job. Let me what is needed.

    **files (1)**

    – ## Week1_Assignment9.pdf

    **## Week1_Assignment9.pdf**

    Due Sunday by 10:59pm
    Points 90
    Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
    Attempts 0
    Allowed Attempts 2

    Start Assignment

     Back to Week at a Glance
    (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/211596/modules/items/9122502

    REVIEWING CODES OF ETHICS
    An ethical code is only as good as its application by practitioners. There are variations among different
    organizations' codes, but they often have a great deal in common. Understanding the ethical practice of
    public relations and developing clear ways to think about ethics are both essential to success.

    Review the code of ethics from the PRSA and from one other public institution provided in the learning
    resources. Submit a 2–3-page paper that addresses the following points:

    Briefly compare the two codes, highlighting the differences between them.
    Describe a situation that might violate one code but not the other.
    If there are provisions of either code that you believe should be revised or strengthened, identify
    them and explain your rationale and suggestion.
    If you don’t believe either code could be improved upon, explain why not.

    RESOURCES

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    WEEKLY RESOURCES

    (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/211596/modules/items/9122509)

    BY DAY 7

    SUBMISSION INFORMATION

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/211596/modules/items/9122502](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/211596/modules/items/9122502)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/211596/modules/items/9122502](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/211596/modules/items/9122502)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/211596/modules/items/9122509](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/211596/modules/items/9122509)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/211596/modules/items/9122509](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/211596/modules/items/9122509)

    PREL_3001_Week1_Assignment_Rubric

    Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check
    your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

    1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as
    WK1Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial

    2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
    3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    The
    assignment
    compares and
    contrasts two
    institution’s
    codes of
    ethics.

    25 pts

    The
    assignment
    provides an
    example of a
    situation
    where one
    code was
    violated but
    not the other.

    25 pts

    The
    assignment
    provides
    suggestions
    for
    improvement
    of the codes
    or an
    explanation
    as to why
    neither code
    needs
    improvement.

    20 pts

    Format and
    Writing

    10 pts

    25 to >21.0 pts
    Exemplary (Exceeds
    expectations)
    This component is fully
    addressed and logically
    presented.

    21 to >17.0 pts
    Proficient Criteria

    This component is
    addressed. Further
    development would
    strengthen this
    component.

    17 to >0 pts
    Developing (Does not
    fully meet expectations)
    This component is not
    present or not clearly
    addressed.

    25 to >21.0 pts
    Exemplary (Exceeds
    expectations)
    This component is fully
    addressed and logically
    presented.

    21 to >17.0 pts
    Proficient Criteria

    This component is
    addressed. Further
    development would
    strengthen this
    component.

    17 to >0 pts
    Developing (Does not
    fully meet expectations)
    This component is not
    present or not clearly
    addressed.

    20 to >18.0 pts
    Exemplary (Exceeds
    expectations)
    This component is fully
    addressed and logically
    presented.

    18 to >13.0 pts
    Proficient Criteria

    This component is
    addressed. Further
    development would
    strengthen this
    component.

    13 to >0 pts
    Developing (Does not
    fully meet expectations)
    This component is not
    present or not clearly
    addressed.

    10 to >8.0 pts
    Exemplary (Exceeds
    expectations)
    Any spelling, grammar,
    and/or punctuation
    deviations from Standard

    8 to >6.0 pts
    Proficient Criteria

    Submission contains few
    spelling, grammar, and/or
    punctuation deviations
    from Standard Academic

    6 to >0 pts
    Developing (Does not
    fully meet expectations)
    Submission contains
    multiple spelling, grammar,
    and/or punctuation

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    Timeliness

    10 pts

    Total Points: 90

    Academic English are
    minor and do not affect
    clear communication.
    Communication
    demonstrates discipline-
    specific conventions, such
    as stylistic choices
    appropriate to an
    academic audience. Work
    includes multiple explicit
    mentions of concepts or
    ideas from the required
    sources correctly cited and
    formatted if specified by
    the
    assignment/discussion. A
    reference page is included
    and properly formatted.

    English, OR these
    deviations do not affect
    clear communication.
    Work includes one or more
    explicit mentions of a
    concept or idea from the
    required sources if
    specified by the
    assignment/discussion’s
    directions, and an attempt
    at citing the source has
    been made. A reference
    page is included.

    deviations from Standard
    Academic English,
    affecting clear
    communication. Work
    does not include any
    explicit mention of
    concepts or ideas from the
    required sources, OR it
    contains one or more
    explicit mention of a
    concept or idea from the
    required sources, if
    specified by the
    assignment/discussion’s
    directions, but without any
    attempt at citing the
    source. A reference page
    is not included.

    10 to >8.0 pts
    Exemplary (Exceeds
    expectations)
    The assignment is
    submitted according to
    posted due dates and
    times or late with prior
    consent from the
    instructor.

    8 to >6.0 pts
    Proficient Criteria

    The assignment is
    submitted within the
    allowed time.

    6 to >0 pts
    Developing (Does not
    fully meet expectations)
    The assignment is not
    submitted on time.

    **## Week1_Assignment9.pdf**

    Due Sunday by 10:59pm
    Points 90
    Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
    Attempts 0
    Allowed Attempts 2

    Start Assignment

     Back to Week at a Glance
    (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/211596/modules/items/9122502

    REVIEWING CODES OF ETHICS
    An ethical code is only as good as its application by practitioners. There are variations among different
    organizations' codes, but they often have a great deal in common. Understanding the ethical practice of
    public relations and developing clear ways to think about ethics are both essential to success.

    Review the code of ethics from the PRSA and from one other public institution provided in the learning
    resources. Submit a 2–3-page paper that addresses the following points:

    Briefly compare the two codes, highlighting the differences between them.
    Describe a situation that might violate one code but not the other.
    If there are provisions of either code that you believe should be revised or strengthened, identify
    them and explain your rationale and suggestion.
    If you don’t believe either code could be improved upon, explain why not.

    RESOURCES

    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

    WEEKLY RESOURCES

    (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/211596/modules/items/9122509)

    BY DAY 7

    SUBMISSION INFORMATION

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/211596/modules/items/9122502](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/211596/modules/items/9122502)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/211596/modules/items/9122502](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/211596/modules/items/9122502)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/211596/modules/items/9122509](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/211596/modules/items/9122509)

    [https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/211596/modules/items/9122509](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/211596/modules/items/9122509)

    PREL_3001_Week1_Assignment_Rubric

    Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check
    your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

    1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as
    WK1Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial

    2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
    3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    The
    assignment
    compares and
    contrasts two
    institution’s
    codes of
    ethics.

    25 pts

    The
    assignment
    provides an
    example of a
    situation
    where one
    code was
    violated but
    not the other.

    25 pts

    The
    assignment
    provides
    suggestions
    for
    improvement
    of the codes
    or an
    explanation
    as to why
    neither code
    needs
    improvement.

    20 pts

    Format and
    Writing

    10 pts

    25 to >21.0 pts
    Exemplary (Exceeds
    expectations)
    This component is fully
    addressed and logically
    presented.

    21 to >17.0 pts
    Proficient Criteria

    This component is
    addressed. Further
    development would
    strengthen this
    component.

    17 to >0 pts
    Developing (Does not
    fully meet expectations)
    This component is not
    present or not clearly
    addressed.

    25 to >21.0 pts
    Exemplary (Exceeds
    expectations)
    This component is fully
    addressed and logically
    presented.

    21 to >17.0 pts
    Proficient Criteria

    This component is
    addressed. Further
    development would
    strengthen this
    component.

    17 to >0 pts
    Developing (Does not
    fully meet expectations)
    This component is not
    present or not clearly
    addressed.

    20 to >18.0 pts
    Exemplary (Exceeds
    expectations)
    This component is fully
    addressed and logically
    presented.

    18 to >13.0 pts
    Proficient Criteria

    This component is
    addressed. Further
    development would
    strengthen this
    component.

    13 to >0 pts
    Developing (Does not
    fully meet expectations)
    This component is not
    present or not clearly
    addressed.

    10 to >8.0 pts
    Exemplary (Exceeds
    expectations)
    Any spelling, grammar,
    and/or punctuation
    deviations from Standard

    8 to >6.0 pts
    Proficient Criteria

    Submission contains few
    spelling, grammar, and/or
    punctuation deviations
    from Standard Academic

    6 to >0 pts
    Developing (Does not
    fully meet expectations)
    Submission contains
    multiple spelling, grammar,
    and/or punctuation

    Criteria Ratings Pts

    Timeliness

    10 pts

    Total Points: 90

    Academic English are
    minor and do not affect
    clear communication.
    Communication
    demonstrates discipline-
    specific conventions, such
    as stylistic choices
    appropriate to an
    academic audience. Work
    includes multiple explicit
    mentions of concepts or
    ideas from the required
    sources correctly cited and
    formatted if specified by
    the
    assignment/discussion. A
    reference page is included
    and properly formatted.

    English, OR these
    deviations do not affect
    clear communication.
    Work includes one or more
    explicit mentions of a
    concept or idea from the
    required sources if
    specified by the
    assignment/discussion’s
    directions, and an attempt
    at citing the source has
    been made. A reference
    page is included.

    deviations from Standard
    Academic English,
    affecting clear
    communication. Work
    does not include any
    explicit mention of
    concepts or ideas from the
    required sources, OR it
    contains one or more
    explicit mention of a
    concept or idea from the
    required sources, if
    specified by the
    assignment/discussion’s
    directions, but without any
    attempt at citing the
    source. A reference page
    is not included.

    10 to >8.0 pts
    Exemplary (Exceeds
    expectations)
    The assignment is
    submitted according to
    posted due dates and
    times or late with prior
    consent from the
    instructor.

    8 to >6.0 pts
    Proficient Criteria

    The assignment is
    submitted within the
    allowed time.

    6 to >0 pts
    Developing (Does not
    fully meet expectations)
    The assignment is not
    submitted on time.

  • [Solved] Chronic disease

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    What health topic rises to residential level?

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    What health topic rises to residential level?

  • [Solved] Task

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Sociology homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/social-science-sociology) See attachments **files (3)** – ## Task.docx – EBSCO-FullText-02_24_2026.pdf – IsCapitalismGendered.pdf **## Task.docx** **Use the two attached reading to complete the assignment below:** **1) QUOTATION**(1 poin…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Sociology homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/social-science-sociology)

    See attachments

    **files (3)**

    – ## Task.docx

    – EBSCO-FullText-02_24_2026.pdf
    – IsCapitalismGendered.pdf

    **## Task.docx**

    **Use the two attached reading to complete the assignment below:**

    **1) QUOTATION**(1 point): Select a quotation (2-4 sentences) from one attached reading that you find interesting and/or representative of the author’s larger argument.
    _Be sure to use appropriate parenthetical citation_.

    **2) CONCEPT/IDEA**(2 points): In this section you should identify the major concept or idea the author is trying to convey, define it in your own words, and describe why it is important
    _sociologically_. You should point out how the author supports his/her argument. In doing this, you are to summarize the author's argument,
    _not_ critique it. Also, keep in mind that concepts are typically bold faced terms in a text or are larger ideas that have a specific sociological meaning, but your contribution should not merely be a restating of an author’s definition of a concept.

    **3)   COMPARISON/CONTRAST**(3 points): Here you will take the ideas raised above and relate it to other course material. You can do this by comparing or contrasting arguments and ideas to other readings used in the course. This includes current readings for the week or from previous weeks. In this section, you may want to point out any similarities or differences between the concepts presented in your summarized reading and the concepts presented in other readings from the course. This comparison must be grounded in the sociological content of the course. The purpose is to strengthen your grasp on the course material for deeper and broader understanding of your social work practice.

    **4)   QUESTION**(2 points): Raise 1 related question about the concept/idea discussed above. Questions are like shovels – they are tools we use to dig deeper into the material we are working with. Like shoveling dirt or snow, asking questions can sometimes get messy. Be okay with that; roll your sleeves up. It’s part of the process of deep critical inquiry and thinking. Your questions should relate to and be inspired by the material you’ve been discussing here. Good questions will be thought provoking, discussable, and may even lead to more questions before leading to any answers. Aim to ask questions that will deepen your/our understanding of the issue at hand. You may want to also ask questions that connect the readings to social work practice. We will follow-up on these questions in our class discussions.

    Example:

    Quotation: “A critical sociological perspective can shine a discomfiting light on members of privileged groups, if only by making their privileges visible. It becomes harder, then, to teach sociological thinking when such thinking induces guilt and seems like putting one’s self in for blame” (Schwalbe 2008 p.xiii).

    Concept/Idea: Schwalbe describes sociological mindfulness as being aware of the larger social context in which we are part of. He applies the notion of sociological mindfulness to the study of inequality. He argues that looking at the world critically and sociologically can be challenging for some people who may feel implicated or at fault for the amount and severity of inequality that exists in society. This is important sociologically because if people feel guilty they may be unwilling or unable to learn about the sociological workings of society, which will likely reinforce them.

    Comparison/Relation: Similar to Schwable’s sociological mindfulness, C. Wright Mills’ The Sociological Imagination discusses the distinction between personal troubles and public issues. Mills argued that in order to understand society, we must first understand our place in it. He emphasized the connection between individuals and society and insisted that we must know both to understand either one. This relates to Schwalbe because if people refuse to look at their place in society for fear of guilt or shame, they will never be able to understand society or themselves. Mills and Schwalbe describe mirror concepts and both suggest that we need to consider how our behaviors and actions are influenced by larger social structures. Further, both argue that people are often unaware of how they participate in something larger than themselves

    Questions: How can people learn to move from individualist views of society to an awareness of the larger social context? How does privilege impact this? What benefit will critical sociological thinking have and for whom?

    **EBSCO-FullText-02_24_2026.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/ebsco-fulltext-02-24-2026-pdf)

    **IsCapitalismGendered.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/iscapitalismgendered-pdf)

    **IsCapitalismGendered.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/iscapitalismgendered-pdf)

    **## Task.docx**

    **Use the two attached reading to complete the assignment below:**

    **1) QUOTATION**(1 point): Select a quotation (2-4 sentences) from one attached reading that you find interesting and/or representative of the author’s larger argument.
    _Be sure to use appropriate parenthetical citation_.

    **2) CONCEPT/IDEA**(2 points): In this section you should identify the major concept or idea the author is trying to convey, define it in your own words, and describe why it is important
    _sociologically_. You should point out how the author supports his/her argument. In doing this, you are to summarize the author's argument,
    _not_ critique it. Also, keep in mind that concepts are typically bold faced terms in a text or are larger ideas that have a specific sociological meaning, but your contribution should not merely be a restating of an author’s definition of a concept.

    **3)   COMPARISON/CONTRAST**(3 points): Here you will take the ideas raised above and relate it to other course material. You can do this by comparing or contrasting arguments and ideas to other readings used in the course. This includes current readings for the week or from previous weeks. In this section, you may want to point out any similarities or differences between the concepts presented in your summarized reading and the concepts presented in other readings from the course. This comparison must be grounded in the sociological content of the course. The purpose is to strengthen your grasp on the course material for deeper and broader understanding of your social work practice.

    **4)   QUESTION**(2 points): Raise 1 related question about the concept/idea discussed above. Questions are like shovels – they are tools we use to dig deeper into the material we are working with. Like shoveling dirt or snow, asking questions can sometimes get messy. Be okay with that; roll your sleeves up. It’s part of the process of deep critical inquiry and thinking. Your questions should relate to and be inspired by the material you’ve been discussing here. Good questions will be thought provoking, discussable, and may even lead to more questions before leading to any answers. Aim to ask questions that will deepen your/our understanding of the issue at hand. You may want to also ask questions that connect the readings to social work practice. We will follow-up on these questions in our class discussions.

    Example:

    Quotation: “A critical sociological perspective can shine a discomfiting light on members of privileged groups, if only by making their privileges visible. It becomes harder, then, to teach sociological thinking when such thinking induces guilt and seems like putting one’s self in for blame” (Schwalbe 2008 p.xiii).

    Concept/Idea: Schwalbe describes sociological mindfulness as being aware of the larger social context in which we are part of. He applies the notion of sociological mindfulness to the study of inequality. He argues that looking at the world critically and sociologically can be challenging for some people who may feel implicated or at fault for the amount and severity of inequality that exists in society. This is important sociologically because if people feel guilty they may be unwilling or unable to learn about the sociological workings of society, which will likely reinforce them.

    Comparison/Relation: Similar to Schwable’s sociological mindfulness, C. Wright Mills’ The Sociological Imagination discusses the distinction between personal troubles and public issues. Mills argued that in order to understand society, we must first understand our place in it. He emphasized the connection between individuals and society and insisted that we must know both to understand either one. This relates to Schwalbe because if people refuse to look at their place in society for fear of guilt or shame, they will never be able to understand society or themselves. Mills and Schwalbe describe mirror concepts and both suggest that we need to consider how our behaviors and actions are influenced by larger social structures. Further, both argue that people are often unaware of how they participate in something larger than themselves

    Questions: How can people learn to move from individualist views of society to an awareness of the larger social context? How does privilege impact this? What benefit will critical sociological thinking have and for whom?

    **EBSCO-FullText-02_24_2026.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/ebsco-fulltext-02-24-2026-pdf)

    **IsCapitalismGendered.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/iscapitalismgendered-pdf)

    **## Task.docx**

    **Use the two attached reading to complete the assignment below:**

    **1) QUOTATION**(1 point): Select a quotation (2-4 sentences) from one attached reading that you find interesting and/or representative of the author’s larger argument.
    _Be sure to use appropriate parenthetical citation_.

    **2) CONCEPT/IDEA**(2 points): In this section you should identify the major concept or idea the author is trying to convey, define it in your own words, and describe why it is important
    _sociologically_. You should point out how the author supports his/her argument. In doing this, you are to summarize the author's argument,
    _not_ critique it. Also, keep in mind that concepts are typically bold faced terms in a text or are larger ideas that have a specific sociological meaning, but your contribution should not merely be a restating of an author’s definition of a concept.

    **3)   COMPARISON/CONTRAST**(3 points): Here you will take the ideas raised above and relate it to other course material. You can do this by comparing or contrasting arguments and ideas to other readings used in the course. This includes current readings for the week or from previous weeks. In this section, you may want to point out any similarities or differences between the concepts presented in your summarized reading and the concepts presented in other readings from the course. This comparison must be grounded in the sociological content of the course. The purpose is to strengthen your grasp on the course material for deeper and broader understanding of your social work practice.

    **4)   QUESTION**(2 points): Raise 1 related question about the concept/idea discussed above. Questions are like shovels – they are tools we use to dig deeper into the material we are working with. Like shoveling dirt or snow, asking questions can sometimes get messy. Be okay with that; roll your sleeves up. It’s part of the process of deep critical inquiry and thinking. Your questions should relate to and be inspired by the material you’ve been discussing here. Good questions will be thought provoking, discussable, and may even lead to more questions before leading to any answers. Aim to ask questions that will deepen your/our understanding of the issue at hand. You may want to also ask questions that connect the readings to social work practice. We will follow-up on these questions in our class discussions.

    Example:

    Quotation: “A critical sociological perspective can shine a discomfiting light on members of privileged groups, if only by making their privileges visible. It becomes harder, then, to teach sociological thinking when such thinking induces guilt and seems like putting one’s self in for blame” (Schwalbe 2008 p.xiii).

    Concept/Idea: Schwalbe describes sociological mindfulness as being aware of the larger social context in which we are part of. He applies the notion of sociological mindfulness to the study of inequality. He argues that looking at the world critically and sociologically can be challenging for some people who may feel implicated or at fault for the amount and severity of inequality that exists in society. This is important sociologically because if people feel guilty they may be unwilling or unable to learn about the sociological workings of society, which will likely reinforce them.

    Comparison/Relation: Similar to Schwable’s sociological mindfulness, C. Wright Mills’ The Sociological Imagination discusses the distinction between personal troubles and public issues. Mills argued that in order to understand society, we must first understand our place in it. He emphasized the connection between individuals and society and insisted that we must know both to understand either one. This relates to Schwalbe because if people refuse to look at their place in society for fear of guilt or shame, they will never be able to understand society or themselves. Mills and Schwalbe describe mirror concepts and both suggest that we need to consider how our behaviors and actions are influenced by larger social structures. Further, both argue that people are often unaware of how they participate in something larger than themselves

    Questions: How can people learn to move from individualist views of society to an awareness of the larger social context? How does privilege impact this? What benefit will critical sociological thinking have and for whom?

    **EBSCO-FullText-02_24_2026.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/ebsco-fulltext-02-24-2026-pdf)

    **IsCapitalismGendered.pdf**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/iscapitalismgendered-pdf)

  • [Solved] Assessment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (1)** – ## Assessment.pdf **## Assessment.pdf** Formative Assessment: Qualitative Review of Data ● Consider the data you proposed to locate from your Problem of Practice in Competency 3. How does this data help you understand the scope of the problem in your workplace? ● Provide a reflection…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (1)**

    – ## Assessment.pdf

    **## Assessment.pdf**

    Formative Assessment: Qualitative Review of Data

    ● Consider the data you proposed to locate from your Problem of Practice in
    Competency 3. How does this data help you understand the scope of the
    problem in your workplace?

    ● Provide a reflection on the qualitative data you found. Consider the following
    questions:

    ○ What qualitative data do you plan to collect or utilize?
    ○ Where will you find this data?
    ○ How is this data useful for you as you build your capstone project?
    ○ What qualitative data would you want to collect as part of your

    action research?
    ■ What questions would you ask in interviews or focus

    groups?
    ■ Who would you collect data from and why?
    ■ Would you consider conducting observations? Why or

    why not?

    Document Type/Template:

    ● This formative may be submitted as an outline, a table, or a reflective paper.
    ● The recommended length for this submission is 1-2 pages.

    – Document Type/Template:

    **## Assessment.pdf**

    Formative Assessment: Qualitative Review of Data

    ● Consider the data you proposed to locate from your Problem of Practice in
    Competency 3. How does this data help you understand the scope of the
    problem in your workplace?

    ● Provide a reflection on the qualitative data you found. Consider the following
    questions:

    ○ What qualitative data do you plan to collect or utilize?
    ○ Where will you find this data?
    ○ How is this data useful for you as you build your capstone project?
    ○ What qualitative data would you want to collect as part of your

    action research?
    ■ What questions would you ask in interviews or focus

    groups?
    ■ Who would you collect data from and why?
    ■ Would you consider conducting observations? Why or

    why not?

    Document Type/Template:

    ● This formative may be submitted as an outline, a table, or a reflective paper.
    ● The recommended length for this submission is 1-2 pages.

    – Document Type/Template:

  • [Solved] Nursing

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    – [\ \ assignment2.jpg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/assignment2-jpg-10505285 "assignment2.jpg")

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    – [\
    \
    assignment2.jpg](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/assignment2-jpg-10505285 "assignment2.jpg")

  • [Solved] Ethical Theories

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    ## **Module 6:** _Human Existence and Universal Energy Models_ **Instructions:** Please choose one of the Models or Theories focused on Human Existence and Universal Energy discussed in this module, define it, and examine literature about the theory identifying other concepts used in theory. Contrib…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    ## **Module 6:** _Human Existence and Universal Energy Models_

    **Instructions:**

    Please choose one of the Models or Theories focused on Human Existence and Universal Energy discussed in this module, define it, and examine literature about the theory identifying other concepts used in theory.

    Contribute a minimum of 4 pages (excluding title page and references page). It should include at least 3 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

    Be sure to review the [academic expectations](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/1876/pages/expectations-and-best-practices-for-assignments) for your submission.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    – Submit your assignment by 11:59 PM Eastern on Sunday.
    – Review the rubric to determine how your assignment will be graded.
    – Your assignment will be run through Turnitin to check for plagiarism.

  • [Solved] Ethical Theories

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    ## **Module 6:** Evidence-Based Practice Beliefs and Implementation in Doctor of Nursing Practice Students **Instructions:** Read the article: Thomas, C. M., & Kellgren, M. (2017). [Benner’s novice to expert model: an application for simulation facilitators.Links to an external site.](https://doi.or…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    ## **Module 6:** Evidence-Based Practice Beliefs and Implementation in Doctor of Nursing Practice Students

    **Instructions:**

    Read the article:

    Thomas, C. M., & Kellgren, M. (2017). [Benner’s novice to expert model: an application for simulation facilitators.Links to an external site.](https://doi.org/10.1177/0894318417708410) _Nursing Science Quarterly_, _30_(3), 227–234.

    Post a summary of what you read and how you have applied it in the past on a specific situation, emphasizing what most caught your attention about the theory involved.

    Remember to review the [academic expectations](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/1876/pages/expectations-and-best-practices-for-discussions) for your submission.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    – Submit your initial discussion post by 11:59 PM Eastern on Wednesday.
    – Contribute a minimum of 450 words for your initial post.
    – Respond to at least two of your classmates' discussion posts by 11:59 PM Eastern on Sunday. Ask a question, and provide a different viewpoint.