Author: admin

  • NURS_6640_Week10_Discussion_Rubric

    NURS_6640_Week10_Discussion_Rubric

    Satisfactory

    Unsatisfactory

    Quality of Work Submitted: The extent of which work meets the assignned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking.

    26 
    (26%)
     – 30 
    (30%)

    Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing good breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics.

    0 
    (0%)
     – 25 
    (25%)

    Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not addressed or inadequately addressed.

    Quality of Work Submitted: The purpose of the paper is clear.

    4 
    (4%)
     – 5 
    (5%)

    Purpose of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

    0 
    (0%)
     – 3 
    (3%)

    No purpose statement was provided.

    Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:

    Understand and interpret the assignment’s key concepts.

    8 
    (8%)
     – 10 
    (10%)

    Demonstrates a clear understanding of key concepts.

    0 
    (0%)
     – 7 
    (7%)

    Shows a lack of understanding of key concepts, deviates from topics.

    Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:

    Apply and integrate material in course rsources (i.e. video, required readings, and textook) and credible outside resources.

    16 
    (16%)
     – 20 
    (20%)

    Integrates specific information from 1 credible outside resource and 2-3 course resources to support major points and point of view.

    0 
    (0%)
     – 15 
    (15%)

    Includes and integrates specific information from 0 to 1 resource to support major points and point of view.

    Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:

    Synthesize (combines various components or different ideas into a new whole) material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, textbook) and outside, credible resources by comparing different points of view and highlighting similarities, differences, and connections.

    16 
    (16%)
     – 20 
    (20%)

    Summarizes information gleaned from sources to support major points, but does not synthesize. NURS_6640_Week10_Discussion_Rubric

    0 
    (0%)
     – 15 
    (15%)

    Rarely or does not interpret, apply, and synthesize concepts, and/or strategies.

    Written Expression and Formatting

    Paragraph and Sentence Structure: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are clearly structured and carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.

    4 
    (4%)
     – 5 
    (5%)

    Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 80% of the time.

    0 
    (0%)
     – 3 
    (3%)

    Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity < 60% of the time. “Written Expression and Formatting English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation” 3  (3%)  – 5  (5%) Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 0  (0%)  – 2  (2%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. “Written Expression and Formatting The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.” 3  (3%)  – 5  (5%) Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors. 0  (0%)  – 2  (2%) Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

  • NURS_6640_Week11_Discussion_Rubric

    NURS_6640_Week11_Discussion_Rubric

    Outstanding Performance

    Excellent Performance

    Competent Performance

    Proficient Performance

    Room for Improvement

    Main Posting:

    Response to the discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

    44 
    (44%)
     – 44 
    (44%)

    Thoroughly responds to the discussion question(s)

    is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

    supported by at least 3 current, credible sources

    40 
    (40%)
     – 43 
    (43%)

    Responds to the discussion question(s)

    is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

    75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth

    supported by at least 3 credible references

    35 
    (35%)
     – 39 
    (39%)

    Responds to most of the discussion question(s)

    is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

    50% of post has exceptional depth and breadth

    supported by at least 3 credible references

    31 
    (31%)
     – 34 
    (34%)

    Responds to some of the discussion question(s)

    one to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed

    is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis

    somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

    post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references

    0 
    (0%)
     – 30 
    (30%)

    Does not respond to the discussion question(s)

    lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria

    lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis

    does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

    contains only 1 or no credible references. NURS_6640_Week11_Discussion_Rubric

    Main Posting:

    Writing

    6 
    (6%)
     – 6 
    (6%)

    Written clearly and concisely

    Contains no grammatical or spelling errors

    Fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style

    5.5 
    (5.5%)
     – 5.5 
    (5.5%)

    Written clearly and concisely

    May contain one or no grammatical or spelling error

    Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style

    5 
    (5%)
     – 5 
    (5%)

    Written concisely

    May contain one to two grammatical or spelling error

    Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style

    4.5 
    (4.5%)
     – 4.5 
    (4.5%)

    Written somewhat concisely

    May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors

    Contains some APA formatting errors

    0 
    (0%)
     – 4 
    (4%)

    Not written clearly or concisely

    Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors

    Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style

    Main Posting:

    Timely and full participation

    10 
    (10%)
     – 10 
    (10%)

    Meets requirements for timely and full participation

    posts main discussion by due date

    0 
    (0%)
     – 0 
    (0%)

    NA

    0 
    (0%)
     – 0 
    (0%)

    NA

    0 
    (0%)
     – 0 
    (0%)

    NA

    0 
    (0%)
     – 0 
    (0%)

    Does not meet requirement for full participation

    First Response:

    Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.

    9 
    (9%)
     – 9 
    (9%)

    Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings

    responds to questions posed by faculty

    the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives

    8.5 
    (8.5%)
     – 8.5 
    (8.5%)

    Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings

    7.5 
    (7.5%)
     – 8 
    (8%)

    Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting

    6.5 
    (6.5%)
     – 7 
    (7%)

    Response is on topic, may have some depth

    0 
    (0%)
     – 6 
    (6%)

    Response may not be on topic, lacks depth

    First Response:

    Writing

    6 
    (6%)
     – 6 
    (6%)

    Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues

    Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed

    Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources

    Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

    5.5 
    (5.5%)
     – 5.5 
    (5.5%)

    Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues

    Response to faculty questions are answered if posed

    Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources

    Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

    5 
    (5%)
     – 5 
    (5%)

    Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues

    Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed

    Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources

    Response is written in Standard Edited English

    4.5 
    (4.5%)
     – 4.5 
    (4.5%)

    Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication

    Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed

    Few or no credible sources are cited

    0 
    (0%)
     – 4 
    (4%)

    Responses posted in the discussion lack effective

    Response to faculty questions are missing

    No credible sources are cited. NURS_6640_Week11_Discussion_Rubric

    First Response:

    Timely and full participation

    5 
    (5%)
     – 5 
    (5%)

    Meets requirements for timely and full participation

    posts by due date

    0 
    (0%)
     – 0 
    (0%)

    NA

    0 
    (0%)
     – 0 
    (0%)

    NA

    0 
    (0%)
     – 0 
    (0%)

    NA

    0 
    (0%)
     – 0 
    (0%)

    Does not meet requirement for full participation

    Second Response:

    Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.

    9 
    (9%)
     – 9 
    (9%)

    Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings * responds to questions posed by faculty

    the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives

    8.5 
    (8.5%)
     – 8.5 
    (8.5%)

    Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings

    7.5 
    (7.5%)
     – 8 
    (8%)

    Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting

    6.5 
    (6.5%)
     – 7 
    (7%)

    Response is on topic, may have some depth

    0 
    (0%)
     – 6 
    (6%)

    Response may not be on topic, lacks depth

    Second Response:

    Writing

    6 
    (6%)
     – 6 
    (6%)

    Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues

    Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed

    Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources

    Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

    5.5 
    (5.5%)
     – 5.5 
    (5.5%)

    Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues

    Response to faculty questions are answered if posed

    Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources

    Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

    5 
    (5%)
     – 5 
    (5%)

    Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues

    Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed

    Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources

    Response is written in Standard Edited English

    4.5 
    (4.5%)
     – 4.5 
    (4.5%)

    Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication

    Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed

    Few or no credible sources are cited

    0 
    (0%)
     – 4 
    (4%)

    Responses posted in the discussion lack effective

    Response to faculty questions are missing

    No credible sources are cited

    Second Response:

    Timely and full participation

    5 
    (5%)
     – 5 
    (5%)

    Meets requirements for timely and full participation

    Posts by due date

    0 
    (0%)
     – 0 
    (0%)

    NA

    0 
    (0%)
     – 0 
    (0%)

    NA

    0 
    (0%)
     – 0 
    (0%)

    NA

    0 
    (0%)
     – 0 
    (0%)

    Does not meet requirement for full participation

    NURS_6640_Week11_Discussion_Rubric

  • NURS_6640_Week3_Assignment1_Rubric

    NURS_6640_Week3_Assignment1_Rubric

    Excellent

    Good

    Fair

    Poor

    Quality of Work Submitted:

    The extent of which work meets the assigned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking.

    27 
    (27%)
     – 30 
    (30%)

    Assignment 
    exceeds
    expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 75% containing 
    exceptional
    breadth and depth about 
    each
     of the assignment topics. NURS_6640_Week3_Assignment1_Rubric

    24 
    (24%)
     – 26 
    (26%)

    Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing 
    good
     breadth and depth about 
    each
     of the assignment topics.

    21 
    (21%)
     – 23 
    (23%)

    Assignment meets most of the expectations. One required topic is either not addressed or inadequately addressed.

    0 
    (0%)
     – 20 
    (20%)

    Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not addressed or inadequately addressed.

    Quality of Work Submitted:

    The purpose of the paper is clear.

    5 
    (5%)
     – 5 
    (5%)

    A clear and comprehensive purpose statement is provided which delineates all required criteria.

    4 
    (4%)
     – 4 
    (4%)

    Purpose of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

    3.5 
    (3.5%)
     – 3.5 
    (3.5%)

    Purpose of the assignment is vague or off topic.

    0 
    (0%)
     – 3 
    (3%)

    No purpose statement was provided.

    Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas:

    The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:Understand and interpret the assignment’s key concepts.

    9 
    (9%)
     – 10 
    (10%)

    Demonstrates the ability to critically appraise and intellectually explore key concepts.

    8 
    (8%)
     – 8 
    (8%)

    Demonstrates a clear understanding of key concepts.

    7 
    (7%)
     – 7 
    (7%)

    Shows some degree of understanding of key concepts.

    0 
    (0%)
     – 6 
    (6%)

    Shows a lack of understanding of key concepts, deviates from topics.

    Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas:

    The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:Apply and integrate material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, and textbook) and credible outside resources.

    18 
    (18%)
     – 20 
    (20%)

    Demonstrates and applies exceptional support of major points and integrates 2 or more credible outside sources, in addition to 2-3 course resources to suppport point of view.

    16 
    (16%)
     – 17 
    (17%)

    Integrates specific information from 1 credible outside resource and 2-3 course resources to support major points and point of view.

    14 
    (14%)
     – 15 
    (15%)

    Minimally includes and integrates specific information from 2-3 resources to support major points and point of view.

    0 
    (0%)
     – 13 
    (13%)

    Includes and integrates specific information from 0 to 1 resoruce to support major points and point of view.

    Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas:

    The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:Synthesize (combines various components or different ideas into a new whole) material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, textbook) and outside, credible resources by comparing different points of view and highlighting similarities, differences, and connections.

    18 
    (18%)
     – 20 
    (20%)

    Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from sources to support major points presented. Applies meaning to the field of advanced nursing practice. NURS_6640_Week3_Assignment1_Rubric

    16 
    (16%)
     – 17 
    (17%)

    Summarizes information gleaned from sources to support major points, but does not synthesize.

    14 
    (14%)
     – 15 
    (15%)

    Identifies but does not interpret or apply concepts, and/or strategies correctly; ideas unclear and/or underdeveloped.

    0 
    (0%)
     – 13 
    (13%)

    Rarely or does not interpret, apply, and synthesize concepts, and/or strategies.

    Written Expression and Formatting

    Paragraph and Sentence Structure: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are clearly structured and carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.

    5 
    (5%)
     – 5 
    (5%)

    Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity

    4 
    (4%)
     – 4 
    (4%)

    Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 80% of the time.

    3.5 
    (3.5%)
     – 3.5 
    (3.5%)

    Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.

    0 
    (0%)
     – 3 
    (3%)

    Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity < 60% of the time. Written Expression and Formatting English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation 5  (5%)  – 5  (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. 4  (4%)  – 4  (4%) Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 3.5  (3.5%)  – 3.5  (3.5%) Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 0  (0%)  – 3  (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Written Expression and Formatting The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. 5  (5%)  – 5  (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors. NURS_6640_Week3_Assignment1_Rubric 4  (4%)  – 4  (4%) Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors. 3.5  (3.5%)  – 3.5  (3.5%) Contains several (3-4) APA format errors. 0  (0%)  – 3  (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. Total Points: 100

  • NURS_6640_Week3_Assignment2_Rubric

    NURS_6640_Week3_Assignment2_Rubric

    Satisfactory

    Unsatisfactory

    Quality of Work Submitted: The extent of which work meets the assignned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking.

    26 
    (26%)
     – 30 
    (30%)

    Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing good breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics.

    0 
    (0%)
     – 25 
    (25%)

    Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not addressed or inadequately addressed.

    Quality of Work Submitted: The purpose of the paper is clear.

    4 
    (4%)
     – 5 
    (5%)

    Purpose of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

    0 
    (0%)
     – 3 
    (3%)

    No purpose statement was provided.

    Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:

    Understand and interpret the assignment’s key concepts.

    8 
    (8%)
     – 10 
    (10%)

    Demonstrates a clear understanding of key concepts.

    0 
    (0%)
     – 7 
    (7%)

    Shows a lack of understanding of key concepts, deviates from topics.

    Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:

    Apply and integrate material in course rsources (i.e. video, required readings, and textook) and credible outside resources.

    16 
    (16%)
     – 20 
    (20%)

    Integrates specific information from 1 credible outside resource and 2-3 course resources to support major points and point of view.

    0 
    (0%)
     – 15 
    (15%)

    Includes and integrates specific information from 0 to 1 resource to support major points and point of view. NURS_6640_Week3_Assignment2_Rubric

    Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:

    Synthesize (combines various components or different ideas into a new whole) material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, textbook) and outside, credible resources by comparing different points of view and highlighting similarities, differences, and connections.

    16 
    (16%)
     – 20 
    (20%)

    Summarizes information gleaned from sources to support major points, but does not synthesize.

    0 
    (0%)
     – 15 
    (15%)

    Rarely or does not interpret, apply, and synthesize concepts, and/or strategies.

    Written Expression and Formatting

    Paragraph and Sentence Structure: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are clearly structured and carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.

    4 
    (4%)
     – 5 
    (5%)

    Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 80% of the time.

    0 
    (0%)
     – 3 
    (3%)

    Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity < 60% of the time. “Written Expression and Formatting English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation” 3  (3%)  – 5  (5%) Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 0  (0%)  – 2  (2%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. “Written Expression and Formatting The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.” 3  (3%)  – 5  (5%) Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors. 0  (0%)  – 2  (2%) Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. Total Points: 100 NURS_6640_Week3_Assignment2_Rubric

  • NURS_6640_Week6_Assignment1_Rubric

    NURS_6640_Week6_Assignment1_Rubric

    Excellent

    Good

    Fair

    Poor

    Quality of Work Submitted:

    The extent of which work meets the assigned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking.

    27 
    (27%)
     – 30 
    (30%)

    Assignment 
    exceeds
    expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 75% containing 
    exceptional
    breadth and depth about 
    each
     of the assignment topics.

    24 
    (24%)
     – 26 
    (26%)

    Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing 
    good
     breadth and depth about 
    each
     of the assignment topics.

    21 
    (21%)
     – 23 
    (23%)

    Assignment meets most of the expectations. One required topic is either not addressed or inadequately addressed.

    0 
    (0%)
     – 20 
    (20%)

    Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not addressed or inadequately addressed.

    Quality of Work Submitted:

    The purpose of the paper is clear.

    5 
    (5%)
     – 5 
    (5%)

    A clear and comprehensive purpose statement is provided which delineates all required criteria.

    4 
    (4%)
     – 4 
    (4%)

    Purpose of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

    3.5 
    (3.5%)
     – 3.5 
    (3.5%)

    Purpose of the assignment is vague or off topic.

    0 
    (0%)
     – 3 
    (3%)

    No purpose statement was provided.

    Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas:

    The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:Understand and interpret the assignment’s key concepts.

    9 
    (9%)
     – 10 
    (10%)

    Demonstrates the ability to critically appraise and intellectually explore key concepts.

    8 
    (8%)
     – 8 
    (8%)

    Demonstrates a clear understanding of key concepts. NURS_6640_Week6_Assignment1_Rubric

    7 
    (7%)
     – 7 
    (7%)

    Shows some degree of understanding of key concepts.

    0 
    (0%)
     – 6 
    (6%)

    Shows a lack of understanding of key concepts, deviates from topics.

    Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas:

    The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:Apply and integrate material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, and textbook) and credible outside resources.

    18 
    (18%)
     – 20 
    (20%)

    Demonstrates and applies exceptional support of major points and integrates 2 or more credible outside sources, in addition to 2-3 course resources to suppport point of view.

    16 
    (16%)
     – 17 
    (17%)

    Integrates specific information from 1 credible outside resource and 2-3 course resources to support major points and point of view. NURS_6640_Week6_Assignment1_Rubric

    14 
    (14%)
     – 15 
    (15%)

    Minimally includes and integrates specific information from 2-3 resources to support major points and point of view.

    0 
    (0%)
     – 13 
    (13%)

    Includes and integrates specific information from 0 to 1 resoruce to support major points and point of view.

    Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas:

    The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:Synthesize (combines various components or different ideas into a new whole) material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, textbook) and outside, credible resources by comparing different points of view and highlighting similarities, differences, and connections.

    18 
    (18%)
     – 20 
    (20%)

    Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from sources to support major points presented. Applies meaning to the field of advanced nursing practice.

    16 
    (16%)
     – 17 
    (17%)

    Summarizes information gleaned from sources to support major points, but does not synthesize. NURS_6640_Week6_Assignment1_Rubric

    14 
    (14%)
     – 15 
    (15%)

    Identifies but does not interpret or apply concepts, and/or strategies correctly; ideas unclear and/or underdeveloped.

    0 
    (0%)
     – 13 
    (13%)

    Rarely or does not interpret, apply, and synthesize concepts, and/or strategies.

    Written Expression and Formatting

    Paragraph and Sentence Structure: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are clearly structured and carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.

    5 
    (5%)
     – 5 
    (5%)

    Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity

    4 
    (4%)
     – 4 
    (4%)

    Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 80% of the time.

    3.5 
    (3.5%)
     – 3.5 
    (3.5%)

    Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.

    0 
    (0%)
     – 3 
    (3%)

    Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity < 60% of the time. Written Expression and Formatting English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation 5  (5%)  – 5  (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. 4  (4%)  – 4  (4%) Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 3.5  (3.5%)  – 3.5  (3.5%) Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 0  (0%)  – 3  (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Written Expression and Formatting The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. 5  (5%)  – 5  (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors. 4  (4%)  – 4  (4%) Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors. 3.5  (3.5%)  – 3.5  (3.5%) Contains several (3-4) APA format errors. 0  (0%)  – 3  (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. Total Points: 100 NURS_6640_Week6_Assignment1_Rubric

  • NURS_6640_Week4_Assignment1_Rubric

    NURS_6640_Week4_Assignment1_Rubric

    Excellent

    Good

    Fair

    Poor

    Quality of Work Submitted:

    The extent of which work meets the assigned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking.

    27 
    (27%)
     – 30 
    (30%)

    Assignment 
    exceeds
    expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 75% containing 
    exceptional
    breadth and depth about 
    each
     of the assignment topics.

    24 
    (24%)
     – 26 
    (26%)

    Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing 
    good
     breadth and depth about 
    each
     of the assignment topics.

    21 
    (21%)
     – 23 
    (23%)

    Assignment meets most of the expectations. One required topic is either not addressed or inadequately addressed.

    0 
    (0%)
     – 20 
    (20%)

    Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not addressed or inadequately addressed.

    Quality of Work Submitted:

    The purpose of the paper is clear.

    5 
    (5%)
     – 5 
    (5%)

    A clear and comprehensive purpose statement is provided which delineates all required criteria.

    4 
    (4%)
     – 4 
    (4%)

    Purpose of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

    3.5 
    (3.5%)
     – 3.5 
    (3.5%)

    Purpose of the assignment is vague or off topic.

    0 
    (0%)
     – 3 
    (3%)

    No purpose statement was provided.

    Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas:

    The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:Understand and interpret the assignment’s key concepts.

    9 
    (9%)
     – 10 
    (10%)

    Demonstrates the ability to critically appraise and intellectually explore key concepts.

    8 
    (8%)
     – 8 
    (8%)

    Demonstrates a clear understanding of key concepts. NURS_6640_Week4_Assignment1_Rubric

    7 
    (7%)
     – 7 
    (7%)

    Shows some degree of understanding of key concepts.

    0 
    (0%)
     – 6 
    (6%)

    Shows a lack of understanding of key concepts, deviates from topics.

    Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas:

    The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:Apply and integrate material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, and textbook) and credible outside resources.

    18 
    (18%)
     – 20 
    (20%)

    Demonstrates and applies exceptional support of major points and integrates 2 or more credible outside sources, in addition to 2-3 course resources to suppport point of view.

    16 
    (16%)
     – 17 
    (17%)

    Integrates specific information from 1 credible outside resource and 2-3 course resources to support major points and point of view. NURS_6640_Week4_Assignment1_Rubric

    14 
    (14%)
     – 15 
    (15%)

    Minimally includes and integrates specific information from 2-3 resources to support major points and point of view.

    0 
    (0%)
     – 13 
    (13%)

    Includes and integrates specific information from 0 to 1 resoruce to support major points and point of view.

    Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas:

    The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:Synthesize (combines various components or different ideas into a new whole) material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, textbook) and outside, credible resources by comparing different points of view and highlighting similarities, differences, and connections.

    18 
    (18%)
     – 20 
    (20%)

    Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from sources to support major points presented. Applies meaning to the field of advanced nursing practice.

    16 
    (16%)
     – 17 
    (17%)

    Summarizes information gleaned from sources to support major points, but does not synthesize. NURS_6640_Week4_Assignment1_Rubric

    14 
    (14%)
     – 15 
    (15%)

    Identifies but does not interpret or apply concepts, and/or strategies correctly; ideas unclear and/or underdeveloped.

    0 
    (0%)
     – 13 
    (13%)

    Rarely or does not interpret, apply, and synthesize concepts, and/or strategies.

    Written Expression and Formatting

    Paragraph and Sentence Structure: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are clearly structured and carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.

    5 
    (5%)
     – 5 
    (5%)

    Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity

    4 
    (4%)
     – 4 
    (4%)

    Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 80% of the time.

    3.5 
    (3.5%)
     – 3.5 
    (3.5%)

    Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.

    0 
    (0%)
     – 3 
    (3%)

    Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity < 60% of the time. Written Expression and Formatting English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation 5  (5%)  – 5  (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. 4  (4%)  – 4  (4%) Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. NURS_6640_Week4_Assignment1_Rubric 3.5  (3.5%)  – 3.5  (3.5%) Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 0  (0%)  – 3  (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Written Expression and Formatting The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. 5  (5%)  – 5  (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors. 4  (4%)  – 4  (4%) Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors. 3.5  (3.5%)  – 3.5  (3.5%) Contains several (3-4) APA format errors. NURS_6640_Week4_Assignment1_Rubric 0  (0%)  – 3  (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. Total Points: 100

  • NURS – 6630 – Psychopharmacologic Approaches to Treatment of Psychopathology

    NURS – 6630 – Psychopharmacologic Approaches to Treatment of Psychopathology

    Syllabus

    Student Support and Calendar Information

    So you have all key information available to you off-line, it is highly recommended that you print the following items for your reference:

    This Syllabus, including the Course Schedule that is linked on this page as a PDF

    Course Calendar

    Student Support

    Credit Hours

    11 weeks

    Walden University assigns credit hours based on the number and type of assignments that enable students to achieve the course learning objectives. In general, each semester credit equals about 42 hours of total student work and each quarter credit equals about 28 hours of total student work. This time requirement represents an approximate average for undergraduate work and the minimum expectations for graduate work. The number and kind of activities estimated to fulfill time requirements will vary by degree level and student learning style and by student familiarity with the delivery method and course content.

    ORDER A CUSTOM-WRITTEN PAPER NOW

    Course Description

    At times, psychotherapy is not enough to alleviate the emotional difficulties that some patients face. To that end, psychopharmacologic approaches are needed. Psychiatric mental health nurse practitioners (PMHNPs) must have a strong basis in psychopharmacology, extending from a prior education in pharmacology, to make appropriate medication choices for their patients. Learners in this course consider psychopharmacologic approaches to major mental health disorders including but not limited to major depressive disorders, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorders, as well as psychotic disorders. Learners explore key considerations associated with medication selection, monitoring of efficacy, and long-term management. NURS – 6630 – Psychopharmacologic Approaches to Treatment of Psychopathology

    Course Prerequisites

    PMHNP Program Core Coures & NURS-6521

    Course Outcomes

    By the end of this course, students will:

    Evaluate foundational neuroscience as it relates to caring for clients with psychiatric disorders across the lifespan

    Assess mechanisms of action of medications used to treat a variety of psychiatric conditions

    Compare evidence-based practices to select appropriate psychopharmacologic agents

    Synthesize pathophysiology and health assessment concepts in the psychopharmacologic treatment of psychiatric mental health disorders

    Evaluate ethical and legal implications of prescribing psychotropic medications across the lifespan

    Evaluate the efficacy and adverse reactions of psychotropic medications

    Recommend strategies to become a social change agent for individuals with psychiatric mental health issues

    Click on the following link to view the Outcomes/Alignment map for NURS 6630:

    Document:
    NURS 6630 Outcomes/Alignment (PDF)

    Course Materials

    Please visit the university bookstore via your Walden student portal to ensure you are obtaining the correct version of any course texts and/or materials noted in the following section. When you receive your materials, make sure that all required items are included.

    Course Texts

    These course texts are available through Stahl Online Resources 
    http://ezp.waldenulibrary.org/login?url=http://stahlonline.cambridge.org/

    Stahl, S. M. (2013).
    Stahl’s essential psychopharmacology: Neuroscientific basis and practical applications
    (4th ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Stahl, S. M. (2014b).
    The prescriber’s guide
    (5th ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. NURS – 6630 – Psychopharmacologic Approaches to Treatment of Psychopathology

    This course text is available through the Walden Library:

    American Psychiatric Association. (2013).
    Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders
    (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

    Note:
     If the print editions of these books are referenced here, electronic versions also may be available and may be acceptable for use in this course. If electronic versions are listed, no print versions are available.

    Other readings (journal articles, websites, book excerpts, etc.) are assigned throughout the course and may be found within each week. NURS – 6630 – Psychopharmacologic Approaches to Treatment of Psychopathology

    Course Readings List

    The Course Readings List contains all of the required Walden Library resources for this course. Please click on the following link to access the list:

    NURS 6630 Course Readings List

    Media

    Assigned course media elements are found within the weekly Learning Resources pages and are available via a streaming media player or a hyperlink to the individual item.

    Grading Criteria and Total Components of a Grade

    Course grades will be based on participation (postings) and completion of assignments listed below.

    Note:
     All assignments must be completed to pass the course.

    Grading Scale

    Letter grades will be assigned as follows:

    90%–100% = A

    80%–89%   = B

    70%–79%   = C

    <70%   = F Please see below for the policy on Incomplete (I) grades. NURS – 6630 – Psychopharmacologic Approaches to Treatment of Psychopathology Important Note:  This course contains weighted grading. Assignments are weighted differently depending on their type. The total points achieved for each assignment will be weighted based on the percentage values noted in the  Weighted Total (%) column of the table that follows.   Assignment Total Points Weighted Total (%) Discussions (5 Discussions, each worth 100 points) Weeks 1, 3, 7, 9 & 10 500 16% Decision Tree (9 Discussions, each worth 100 points) Weeks 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 & 10 900 40% Midterm Week 6 75 22% Final Exam Week 11 75 22% Total 1,550 100% *  Each Discussion requires that you make one initial posting and  at least two  response postings to colleagues. See the Formative Evaluative Criteria for Discussion Board Assignments for posting details. Note:  All assignments must be completed in order to receive a grade for the course. NURS – 6630 – Psychopharmacologic Approaches to Treatment of Psychopathology Dedicated Support for Course Media You may use the following e-mail address and toll-free number for any questions or concerns you have about media in the course. E-mail: mediasupport@waldenu.edu Phone:  1-877-238-2963 Course Assignments Online Discussion and Blog Assignment The exchange of ideas between colleagues engaged in scholarly inquiry is a key aspect of graduate-level learning and is a requisite activity in this course. Requirements : You are expected to participate  at least two  separate days a week in the weekly  Discussion  area. Discussion topics/questions are provided in the Discussion area. In addition, you are expected to respond to your fellow students’ postings. To count as participation, responses need to be thoughtful; that is, they must refer to the week’s readings, relevant issues in the news, information obtained from other sources, and/or ideas expressed in other class members’ postings. Where appropriate, you should use references to support your position. Most weeks have at least one Discussion question. The Discussion questions require a response to one other student’s posting; it should be no more than two paragraphs long. NURS – 6630 – Psychopharmacologic Approaches to Treatment of Psychopathology All Discussion postings need to be made in each week’s  Discussion  area of the course, unless otherwise stated. Please do not e-mail postings to the Instructor or other students. Refer to the  Discussion  area for specific instructions. Discussions will be graded according to the Discussion Rubric found in the  Course Information  area. Assignments and Projects An Assignment or Project often is a writing assignment submitted to the Instructor for evaluation. Complete Assignment or Project directions are in the  Assignments  or  Projects  areas, including how and where to submit the Assignment or Project and the due date. Please note that you should keep copies of your Assignments and Projects on your computer in case of any technical difficulties. Information on scholarly writing may be found in the APA manual and at the Walden Writing Center website. Please refer to the APA Guide or visit the Walden University Online Writing Center at http://writingcenter.waldenu.edu/ Walden University expects you to act with integrity and honesty in your academic courses. Refer to the  Guidelines and Policies  and  Academic Integrity  areas for more details. Check the  Course Information  area for any rubrics relating to the Assignments and Projects. All assignments must be completed to pass the course. Preferred Methods for Delivering Assignments Submitting Course Postings to the Weekly Discussion Areas Be sure that you post to the correct  Discussion  area each week. Do not e-mail postings to the Instructor. For all initial Discussion postings, make sure that the first sentence of your posting reads  Main Question Post . For your responses to others’ postings, make sure that the first sentence of your response reads  Response . These actions will ensure easily identifiable subject lines for your postings and responses. NURS – 6630 – Psychopharmacologic Approaches to Treatment of Psychopathology Submitting Assignments and Projects Assignments and Projects are submitted according to the instructions in the  Assignments  or  Projects  areas and are named according to the week in which the Assignment or Project is submitted. Directions for naming each Assignment or Project are included in each week’s  Assignment  or  Project  area. NURS – 6630 – Psychopharmacologic Approaches to Treatment of Psychopathology E-mailing Your Instructor When e-mailing the Instructor, please use the following heading for your e-mail subject line:  last name + your first initial + course number  (e.g., RideSHUMN6815) so that your Instructor will recognize and read your e-mail. NURS – 6630 – Psychopharmacologic Approaches to Treatment of Psychopathology . Policies on Late Assignments Discussion and Assignment Postings No credit will be given for Discussion and Assignment postings made after the week in which they are due unless prior arrangements are made with the Instructor. Exceptions will be made only for those rare situations that legitimately prevent a student from posting on time. Points will be deducted from late postings. Assignments Assignments are due by  Day 7  of the week in which they are assigned unless otherwise noted. Failure to meet the deadline without prior approval will result in at least a 3-point deduction per day. Any Assignment submitted after  Day 4 of the week following that in which it is assigned will receive zero points. Projects Projects are due by  Day 7  of the week in which they are assigned unless otherwise noted. Failure to meet the deadline without prior approval will result in at least a 3-point deduction per day. Any Project submitted after  Day 4  of the week following that in which it is assigned will receive zero points. No Assignment or Project will be accepted after the last day of the quarter (Week 6, Day 7) unless prior approval is obtained. Students With Disabilities Students in this course who have a disability that might prevent them from fully demonstrating their abilities should contact the director of disability services at  disability@waldenu.edu  or at 1-800-925-3368, ext. 312-1205 and +1-612-925-3368 or  https://www.waldenu.edu/contact  for international toll-free numbers as soon as possible to initiate disability verification and discuss accommodations that may be necessary to ensure full participation in the successful completion of course requirements. NURS – 6630 – Psychopharmacologic Approaches to Treatment of Psychopathology Classroom Participation In accordance with U.S. Department of Education guidance regarding class participation, Walden University requires that all students submit at least one of their required Week 1 assignments (which includes posting to the Discussion Board) within each course(s) during the first 7 calendar days of class. For courses with two-week units, posting to the Discussion Board by Day 7 meets this requirement. The first calendar day of class is the official start date of the course as posted on your myWalden academic page. Assignments submitted prior to the official start date  will not  count toward your participation. Financial Aid cannot be released without class participation as defined above. Students who  are taking their first class with Walden  and do not submit at least one of their required Week 1 assignments (or at least one Discussion post) by the end of the 7th day will be administratively withdrawn from the university. NURS – 6630 – Psychopharmacologic Approaches to Treatment of Psychopathology . Students who have already taken and successfully completed  at least one  or more class(es) with Walden, and who  do not participate  within the first 7 days, will be dropped from that class. If you have any questions about your assignments, or you are unable to complete your assignments, please contact your Faculty Member. Checklist The weekly course checklist below outlines the assignments due for the course. For full assignment details and directions, refer to each week of the course. All assignments are due by 11:59 p.m. Mountain Time (MT) on the day assigned (which is 1:59 a.m. Eastern Time (ET) the next day). The time stamp in the classroom will reflect Eastern Time (ET), regardless of your time zone. As long as your submission time stamp is no later than 1:59 a.m. Eastern Time (ET), you have submitted on time. NURS – 6630 – Psychopharmacologic Approaches to Treatment of Psychopathology To view the Course Calendar: Course Calendar To View a Printable Course Schedule For full assignment details and directions, refer to each week of the course. Click on the  NURS 6630 Course Schedule (PDF)  link to access the Course Schedule. Document: NURS 6630 Course Schedule (PDF) Checklist Module Assignment Title Week 1 Introduction to Neuroscience Discussion Foundational Neuroscience Week 2 Therapy for Pediatric Clients With Mood Disorders Assignment Assessing and Treating Pediatric Clients with Mood Disorders Week 3 Adult and Geriatric Antidepressant Therapy Discussion The Impact of Ethnicity on Antidepressant Therapy Assignment Assessing and Treating Adult and Geriatric Clients With Mood Disorders Week 4 Bipolar Therapy Assignment Assessing and Treating Clients with With Bipolar Disorder Week 5 Anxiolytic Therapy & PTSD Treatment Assignment Assessing and Treating Clients With Anxiety Disorders Week 6 Antipsychotic Therapy Assignment Assessing and Treating Clients With Psychosis and Schizophrenia Week 7 Therapy for Clients With Pain and Sleep/Wake Disorders Discussion Sleep/Wake Disorders Assignment Assessing and Treating Clients With Pain Week 8 Therapy for Clients With Impulsivity, Compulsivity, and Addiction Assignment Assessing and Treating Clients With Impulsivity, Compulsivity, and Addiction Week 9 Therapy for Clients with ADHD Discussion Presentations of ADHD Assignment Assessing and Treating Clients With ADHD Week 10 Therapy for Clients with Dementia Discussion Influencing Social Change Assignment Assessing and Treating Clients With Dementia Week 11 Therapy for Clients With Comorbid Conditions Final Exam Bibliography The bibliography contains the references for all learning materials in the course. For your convenience, a link has been provided to download and save the bibliography. NURS – 6630 – Psychopharmacologic Approaches to Treatment of Psychopathology

  • NURS – 6630 Discussion: Foundational Neuroscience

    NURS – 6630 Discussion: Foundational
    Neuroscience

    Agonist-to-Antagonist Spectrum of Action

                According to Indian Health Service (IHS, 2020), an agonist is any drug that activates specific brain receptors, thus causing the full effect of the drug to take place (p. 1). A partial agonist is a drug that acts as an agonist but the degree of receptor activation is reduced. When a drug is classified as an antagonist, it means that the drug blocks the receptors so they are not able to bind to the agonist. In the realm of opioids, an example of an agonist is Heroin, the antagonist is Naloxone, and a partial agonist is Buprenorphine. To expand on this example, Heroin is an addictive agonistic substance. In the case of a Heroin overdose, Naloxone, an antagonist, can be used to reverse the binding and block receptors from binding with free-floating Heroin. Pharmacological treatment for Heroin addiction often includes the partial agonist, Buprenorphine. Buprenorphine allows partial binding to opioid receptors, thus reducing withdrawal symptoms and curving drug cravings (IHS, 2020, p. 2).

    ORDER A CUSTOM-WRITTEN PAPER NOW

    Compare and Contrast: Ion Gated Channels and G-couple-proteins

                Ion Gated Channels (IGCs) and G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are two classes of postsynaptic receptors. IGCs, also referred to as ligand-gated ion channels, have two domains. One domain functions to bind neurotransmitters (extracellular) and the other that forms the ion channel. GPCRs work via second messenger systems that are slower and rely on a variety of metabolic steps (Camprodon & Roffman, 2016, p. 47). GPCRs are also called metabotropic receptors. When the neurotransmitter binds to the metabotropic receptors, the G-proteins are activated. The G-proteins then separate from the receptor and directly interact with the ion channels or pair with effector proteins to control the ion channels via intracellular messengers (McEnery & Siegel, 2014, p. 552).

    Epigenetics and Pharmacological Action
     

    Epigenetics can be defined in many ways, but the basis is that gene function can be altered without changing the DNA and RNA code. This functional change in the gene can also be inherited (Camprodon & Roffman, 2016, p. 64). As a result, epigenetics can determine how a medication works and what illnesses an individual may develop. If a medication works on a specific gene, but that gene has an altered function, the drug’s efficacy may change. For example, individuals with altered dopamine formation and receptor binding may have an affinity towards drug addiction or a degree of natural tolerance (Saad et al., 2019, p. 1534).
     For non-addictive substances, this logic holds true as to why some medications work for one person, but not another individual. 

    Best Practice

    It is essential to gather a thorough medical and family history before prescribing medications. Currently, the clinic I work in considers the patient’s familial medication history when prescribing medications, as well as genetic testing for patients where multiple psychotropics drugs have failed to treat their symptoms. As previously stated, some genes that affect medication efficacy may be inherited. In knowing what medications have worked for close relatives in the patient’s family, the patient may find success in using the same medication because of epigenetics.

    Genetic Testing
    One of the reasons the genetic testing is performed is to assess if the patient has normal Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene function and is able to convert Folate to L-Methyl-Folate (LMF). LMF is necessary for the production of serotonin, dopamine, and norepinephrine (Shelton, Manning, Barrentine, & Tipa, 2013, p. 2). If this is impaired, even with medication, the patient’s body is not appropriately producing enough of the LMF cofactor to produce the necessary neurotransmitters for a stable mood- hence drug-resistant depression. Medication prescribing is not “cookie-cutter.” Modern science gives prescribing providers greater insight into what is going on in the very foundation of their patient’s being, their DNA. Although some are skeptical of genetic testing for psychotropic medications, I have first-hand seen the benefits in my employer’s clinic by using this resource as a means of guided prescribing.

     

     

    References

    Camprodon, J. A., & Roffman, J. L. (2016). Psychiatric neuroscience: Incorporating pathophysiology into clinical case formulation. In T. A. Stern, M. Favo, T. E. Wilens, & J. F. Rosenbaum. (Eds.),

    Massachusetts General Hospital psychopharmacology and neurotherapeutics.  Elsevier.

    McEnery, M. W. & Siegel, R. E. (2014). Neurotransmitter Receptors. Encyclopedia of the Neurological Sciences, pp. 552-564. Retrieved from

    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780123851574000440

    Indian Health Service. (2020). Pharmacological Treatment. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

    Retrieved from https://www.ihs.gov/opioids/recovery/pharmatreatment/

    Saad, M.H., Rumschlag, M., Guerra, M.H.m Savonen, C. L., Jaster, A. M., Olson, P. D., Alazizi, A., Luca, F., Pique-Regi, R.,

    Schmidt, C. J., & Bannon, M. J. (2019). Differentially expressed gene networks, biomarkers, long noncoding RNAs, and

    shared responses with cocaine identified in the midbrains of human opioid abusers. Scientific Reports, 9, pp. 1534.

    Retrieved from https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-38209-8

    Shelton, R. C., Sloan Manning, J., Barrentine, L. W., & Tipa, E. V. (2013). Assessing Effects of l-Methylfolate in Depression Management:

    Results of a Real-World Patient Experience Trial. The primary care companion for CNS disorders, 15(4), pp. 1-11.

    Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3869616/?report=printable

    Week 1: Introduction to Neuroscience

    Modern psychopharmacology is largely the story of chemical neurotransmission. To understand the actions of drugs on the brain, to grasp the impact of diseases on the central nervous system, and to interpret the behavioral consequences of psychiatric medicines, one must be fluent in the language and principles of neurotransmission. NURS – 6630 Discussion: Foundational Neuroscience .

    —Dr. Stephen M. Stahl in Stahl’s Essential Psychopharmacology

    By using a combination of psychotherapy and medication therapy, psychiatric mental health nurse practitioners are positioned to provide a very unique type of care to clients with psychiatric disorders. To be successful in this role, you must have a strong theoretical foundation in pathophysiology, psychopharmacology, and neuroscience. This foundation will help you assess, diagnose, and treat clients as you relate presenting symptoms to theoretical neuronal functioning.

    ORDER A CUSTOM-WRITTEN PAPER NOW

    This week, as you begin to study psychopharmacology, you explore foundational neuroscience. You examine the agonist-to-antagonist spectrum of action of psychopharmacologic agents, compare the actions of g couple proteins to ion gated channels, and consider the role of epigenetics in pharmacologic action.

    Note:
     In previous courses, the term “patient” was used to describe the person receiving medical care. In traditional medicine and nursing, this term is used to describe the person you do something to, and it often refers to a passive recipient of care and services. As you move into the realm of psychiatric mental health, a transition will occur. You will work with individuals who are active participants in their care, and these individuals are generally referred to as “clients” as opposed to “patients.” It is important to note that the term “client” is also favored in other mental health disciplines, such as psychiatry, psychology, and social work. NURS – 6630 Discussion: Foundational Neuroscience .

     

    Discussion:
    Foundational Neuroscience

    As a psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner, it is essential for you to have a strong background in foundational neuroscience. In order to diagnose and treat clients, you must not only understand the pathophysiology of psychiatric disorders, but also how medications for these disorders impact the central nervous system. These concepts of foundational neuroscience can be challenging to understand. Therefore, this Discussion is designed to encourage you to think through these concepts, develop a rationale for your thinking, and deepen your understanding by interacting with your colleagues.

    Learning Objectives

    Students will:

    Analyze the agonist-to-antagonist spectrum of action of psychopharmacologic agents

    Compare the actions of g couple proteins to ion gated channels

    Analyze the role of epigenetics in pharmacologic action

    Analyze the impact of foundational neuroscience on the prescription of medications

    Learning Resources

    Note:
     To access this week’s required library resources, please click on the link to the Course Readings List, found in the 
    Course Materials
     section of your Syllabus. NURS – 6630 Discussion: Foundational Neuroscience

    Required Readings

    Note:
    All Stahl resources can be accessed through the Walden Library using this link. This link will take you to a log-in page for the Walden Library. Once you log into the library, the Stahl website will appear.

    Stahl, S. M. (2013).
    Stahl’s essential psychopharmacology: Neuroscientific basis and practical applications
    (4th ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press *Preface, pp. ix–x

     

    Note:
    To access the following chapters, click on the
    Essential Psychopharmacology, 4th ed
    tab on the Stahl Online website and select the appropriate chapter. Be sure to read all sections on the left navigation bar for each chapter.

    Chapter 1, “Chemical Neurotransmission”

    Chapter 2, “Transporters, Receptors, and Enzymes as Targets of Psychopharmacologic Drug Action”

    Chapter 3, “Ion Channels as Targets of Psychopharmacologic Drug Action”

    Document:
    Midterm Exam Study Guide (PDF). NURS – 6630 Discussion: Foundational Neuroscience

    Document:
    Final Exam Study Guide (PDF)

    Explain the agonist-to-antagonist spectrum of action of psychopharmacologic agents, including how partial and inverse agonist functionality may impact the efficacy of psychopharmacologic treatments.
        

     

    Agonists are ligands that bind to receptors and alter or modify the state of the receptors in such a way it triggers a biological response, whereas antagonist are alpha or beta blocker ligands that refrain from or dampen a biological reaction but blocks the presenting receptors. A full agonist has the capability of producing maximal response of the target system. As the receptor stimulus invoked by an agonist maximizes its response capability as a full agonist in such system.

     

    Partial agonists bind to and activate the presenting receptors; however, they do not have the ability to induce maximal intrinsic activity capable of producing full agonists even at full receptor occupancy and high concentration because of their low maximal efficacy when compared to the maximal efficacy of full agonists. When these partial agonists compete for the same receptors with full agonists they act as antagonists. Unless the partial agonists bind to the receptors in some sort of irreversible manner, it could be potentially be displaced from the receptor by a sufficiently high concentration of full agonist. In view of this, the efficacy of the full agonist is not affected, but its potency is reduced. Conversely, inverse agonists bind to receptors and reduce fraction of them in an active conformation. It could potentially decrease the available fraction of active receptors by binding to receptors in their inactive state preferentially, thus reducing the total possible pool of receptors in the system. In other words, an inverse agonist’s oppositional activity could be significantly reduced by competitive neutral antagonists that also bind the receptors but do nothing with them once they are attached (Camprodon and Roffman, 2016).

     

    Compare and contrast the actions of g couple proteins and ion gated channels.

     

    Neurotransmitter
     receptors such as acetylcholine that are 
    ligand
    -gated ion channels have the tendency to mediate rapid postsynaptic responses while 
    G protein
     – coupled neurotransmitter receptors such as serotonin and dopamine have the tendency to mediate slow postsynaptic responses. More so, a G protein-coupled receptor consist of a single polypeptide that is threaded over membrane, while ion channels comprise of pores that open and close upon ligand binding.

     

    G protein coupled receptors interact with a variety of proteins for intracellular response, while ion channels regulate flow of ions.  Finally, G protein involves GTP (Guanosine Triphosphate) whereas ion channels do not involve GTP.

     

    Explain how the role of epigenetics may contribute to pharmacologic action.

     

    The drug metabolism, as a biochemical process, requires modification of pharmaceutical substances through specialized enzymatic systems. Epigenetic regulation of drug-metabolizing enzyme genes has been shown to be a significant mechanism of changes in the expression of those drug-metabolizing enzymes.  In other words, Drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion are critical processes to be considered when developing safe drugs. These identified processes are mediated by drug-metabolizing enzymes such as cytochrome P450 and transporters such as ATP-binding cassettes that are expressed in various tissues of the body such as the small intestine, liver, and kidney. These processes could potentially inhibit, limit, or enhance the systemic and target organ exposure to xenobiotics (Camprodon and Roffman, 2016). Drug-metabolizing enzymes such as cytochrome P450 isoforms are responsible for the metabolic elimination of drugs, and membrane transporters such as ATP-binding cassette transporters can affect drug absorption, distribution, and excretion processes. More so, the interplay of these drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters could potentially determine the pharmacokinetic properties of a drug in areas of bioavailability, volume of distribution, and half-life, as well as understanding the regulation of drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters are critical to the prediction of consequent pharmacological and toxicological effects.

     

    Explain how this information may impact the way you prescribe medications to patients. Include a specific example of a situation or case with a patient in which the psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner must be aware of the medication’s action.

     

    As a mental health nurse practitioner, it is extremely critical to understand that the pharmacokinetic properties such as the distribution, absorption, metabolism, and excretion processes of any given medication to be prescribed to a patient. More so, these processes identified above are significantly influenced by the route of administration as well as the functionality of the body organs. For instance, understanding the absorption, metabolic and distribution processes of enteral medications will make the prescribing practitioner be well informed that such medication is best absorbed in the stomach and should be best administered orally. Understanding the pharmacological and toxicological consequence or effect of a drug regarding dosage makes a huge difference in the favorability of the patient’s treatment outcome and could be a defining factor between life and death.

     

     

     

    Reference:

    Camprodon, J. A., & Roffman, J. L. (2016). Psychiatric neuroscience: Incorporating pathophysiology into clinical case formulation. In T. A. Stern, M. Favo, T. E. Wilens, & J. F. Rosenbaum. (Eds.),
    Massachusetts General Hospital psychopharmacology and neurotherapeutics
     (pp. 1–19). Elsevier.

    Required Media

    Laureate Education (Producer). (2016i).
    Introduction to psychopharmacology
    [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

     

    Note:
    The approximate length of this media piece is 3 minutes.

    Accessible player
     
    –Downloads–
    Download Video w/CC
    Download Audio
    Download Transcript

    Optional Resources

    Laureate Education (Producer). (2009).
    Pathopharmacology: Disorders of the nervous system: Exploring the human brain
    [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

     

    Note:
    The approximate length of this media piece is 15 minutes.

     

    Dr. Myslinski reviews the structure and function of the human brain. Using human brains, he examines and illustrates the development of the brain and areas impacted by disorders associated with the brain.

     

    Accessible player
     
    –Downloads–
    Download Video w/CC
    Download Audio
    Download Transcript

    Laureate Education (Producer). (2012).
    Introduction to advanced pharmacology
    [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

     

    Note:
    The approximate length of this media piece is 8 minutes.

     

    In this media presentation, Dr. Terry Buttaro, associate professor of practice at Simmons School of Nursing and Health Sciences, discusses the importance of pharmacology for the advanced practice nurse.

     

    Accessible player
     
    –Downloads–
    Download Video w/CC
    Download Audio
    Download Transcript

     

    Agonists are drugs with both affinity (they bind to the target receptor) and intrinsic efficacy (they change receptor activity to produce a response (NCBI 2018). Antagonists have affinity but zero intrinsic efficacy and therefore they bind to the target receptor but do not produce a response. By occupying a fraction of the receptor population an antagonist reduces the probability of occupancy by an agonist. The presence of an antagonist will reduce receptor occupancy by an agonist with a corresponding reduction in response. By increasing the concentration of the agonist, the probability of receptor occupancy by the agonist increases, and thus the inhibitory/blocking effect of the antagonist can be surmounted (NCBI 2018). As intrinsic efficacy differs with drug structure, agonists can have different intrinsic efficacies and consequently be characterized as full or partial agonists. A full agonist typically produces the maximal response a system is capable of, whereas a partial agonist produces a submaximal response (NCBI 2018).

    G proteins are a family of proteins that act as molecular switches inside cells and are involved in transmitting signals from a variety of stimuli outside a cell to 
    its
     interior. G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) mediate most of our physiological responses to hormones, neurotransmitters, and environmental stimulants, and so have great potential as therapeutic targets for a broad spectrum of diseases (NCBI 2009). GPCRs are the largest family of membrane proteins and mediate most cellular responses to hormones and neurotransmitters, as well as being responsible for vision, olfaction, and taste (NCBI 2009). G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are involved in the control of every aspect of our behavior and physiology (Hamm 2001). More than half of all drugs target GPCRs and either activate or inactivate them. GPCRs have a common body plan with seven transmembrane helices (Hamm 2001).

    Ligand-gated ion channels (LGICs) are integral membrane proteins that contain a pore which allows the regulated flow of selected ions across the plasma membrane (Alexander et al,2017). Ligand-gated ion channels bind neurotransmitters and open in response to ligand binding. These channels control synaptic transmission between two neurons or between a neuron and a muscle. Ion channel function is modulated by interactions with other proteins (Alexander et al,2017).

    Epigenetics is a mechanism of gene control that can promote or repress the expression of genes without altering the genetic coding of an organism (NCBI 2011). It represents a system by which the gene expression of an individual can be altered without altering their genome’s sequence. Unlike genetic changes, epigenetic changes are reversible and do not change the DNA sequence, but it can change how the body reads a DNA sequence (NCBI 2011). The disease may be caused by direct changes in epigenetic marks, such as DNA methylation found to affect imprinted gene regulation. Studies have found that exposure to risk factors such as toxins, stress, and unhealthy diets are associated with epigenetic changes which are associated with mental health problems. Epigenetic drugs belong to a category of drugs used for the treatment of specific cancers. These drugs fall into two groups DNA methylation inhibitors and histone deacetylase inhibitors (NCBI 2011). A nurse practitioner should be careful when prescribing psychiatric medication for a patient who is diagnosed with cancer or has a strong family history of cancer.

     

    References

    Alexander, S. P., Peters, J. A., Kelly, E., Marrion, N. V., Faccenda, E., Harding, S. D., Pawson, A. J., Sharman, J. L., Southan, C., & Davies, J. A. (2017). THE CONCISE GUIDE TO PHARMACOLOGY 2017/18: Ligand-gated ion channels. 
    British Journal of Pharmacology
    , 
    174 Suppl 1
    , S130–S159.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/bph.13879

     

    Hamm, H. E. (2001). How activated receptors couple to G proteins. 
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
    , 
    98
    (9), 4819–4821.

    National center for biotechnology Information (NCBI 2018). Making sense of pharmacology: Inverse Agonism and functional selectivity. Retrieved from
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6165953/

    National center for biotechnology Information (NCBI 2009). The structure and function of G-protein-coupled receptors. Retrieved from
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3967846/

    National center for biotechnology Information (NCBI 2011). Epigenetics and Lifestyle. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3752894/

     

    To prepare for this Discussion:

    Review this week’s Learning Resources.

    Reflect on concepts of foundational neuroscience. NURS –
    6630 Discussion: Foundational Neuroscience

    Note:
     For this Discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the “Post to Discussion Question” link and then select “Create Thread” to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click on Submit, you cannot delete or edit your own posts, and you cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking on 
    Submit! 
    NURS – 6630 Discussion: Foundational Neuroscience .

    By Day 3

    Post
     a response to each of the following
    :

    Explain the agonist-to-antagonist spectrum of action of psychopharmacologic agents.

    Compare and contrast the actions of g couple proteins and ion gated channels.

    Explain the role of epigenetics in pharmacologic action.

    Explain how this information may impact the way you prescribe medications to clients. Include a specific example of a situation or case with a client in which the psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner must be aware of the medication’s action. NURS – 6630 Discussion: Foundational Neuroscience

    Read 
    a selection of your colleagues’ responses.

    ORDER A CUSTOM-WRITTEN PAPER NOW

    By Day 6

    Respond
     to two colleagues in one of the following ways:

    If your colleagues’ posts influenced your understanding of these concepts, be sure to share how and why. Include additional insights you gained. NURS – 6630 Discussion: Foundational Neuroscience

    If you think your colleagues might have misunderstood these concepts, offer your alternative perspective and be sure to provide an explanation for them. Include resources to support your perspective.

    Submission and Grading Information

    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Week 1 Discussion Rubric

    Post
    by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6

    To participate in this Discussion:

    Week 1 Discussion

    Making Connections

    Now that you have:

    Explored foundational neuroscience

    Examined how medications impact the central nervous system

    Next week, you will focus on how neuroscience can be applied to pediatric clients presenting with mood disorders. NURS – 6630 Discussion:
    Foundational Neuroscience

    Week 2 Discussion-Main Post

     

    This discussion will focus on the agonistic and antagonistic actions of psychotropic medications, ion channels, g coupled proteins, the role of epigenetics in pharmacologic action, and the efficiency in prescribing medication based on these factors. The understanding of these factors aids in determining the most effective course of treatment.

    In receptor antagonism, a medication to promote reuptake reduction, such as the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) sertraline, fills the receptor site, thus preventing the post-synaptic reuptake of the neurotransmitter serotonin (Camprodon and Roffman, 2016). Receptor agonism occurs when the medication has an affinity for specific receptor sites, as in an opioid’s affinity for mu receptors (Camprodon and Roffman, 2016). On the other hand, naltrexone is an opioid antagonist, which, when administered, dominates the mu receptor sites, preventing opioid agonist action. (Camprodon and Roffman, 2016). In the middle is the partial agonist. For example, buprenorphine is a partial mu-opioid receptor used in managing withdrawal from opiates as partial agonism provides enough activation of the opiate receptor to minimalize withdrawal symptoms and not promote a “high” (Camprodon and Roffman, 2016). Lastly, an inverse agonist is a molecule that produces an agonist’s opposite effect (Weir, 2020). An inverse agonist is only useful if the receptor site is active without an agonist present (Weir, 2020). Even if an antagonist is present, which competes for the same receptor site as an inverse agonist, without an agonist present, the antagonist is completely ineffectual (Weir, 2020).

    Concerning coupled proteins, their role as a membrane receptor is intervening in the activity of neurotransmitters, various hormones and affecting heart contractility, sight, and inflammation (Calebiro and Grimes, 2020). In direct relation to g coupled proteins, ion channels are precisely affected by the action of g coupled proteins (Caleiro and Grimes, 2020).  Once an agonist binds to the plasma membrane, a g coupled protein is recruited, followed by alteration in an ion channel (Calebiro and Grimes, 2020).

    Another avenue in selecting a course of treatment involves epigenetics. For example, in anxiety disorders, research shows that dysfunctional gene expression resulting in the abnormal concentration of serotonin, GABA and norepinephrine, negatively impacts the body’s psychological and physiological state via increased and sustained cortisol levels (Peedicayil, 2020). To combat the effects of these dysfunctions, medication classes such as SSRIs inhibit the reuptake of serotonin, resulting in anxiolytic action (Peedicayil, 2020). In acute cases, immediate relief of symptoms is sought, which the benzodiazepine class is recommended (Peedicayil, 2020).

    Fortunately, pharmacogenetic testing is available to reveal how the patient processes certain medications, thus ensuring the most efficient medication is selected for treatment. Pharmacogenetic testing shows if a patient is a normal, fast, or slow metabolizer of a specific medication based on the individual’s biological variant of drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters (Yu et al., 2017).

    Finally, as a psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner (PMHNP), these aspects of treatment must be considered to discover the best course of action. As a subjective opinion and prioritizing safety, if a PMHNP is contemplating starting a patient on a first-generation antipsychotic due to the patient’s failure to respond to safer and newer medications, pharmacogenetic testing is crucial. For example, a patient treated with haloperidol, which was personally witnessed, turned out to be a slow metabolizer of haloperidol after epigenetic testing results were released. These results explained why an initial 2.5 mg dose produced rapid extrapyramidal symptoms. With research showing that haloperidol most commonly produces extrapyramidal symptoms, extrapyramidal symptoms can develop rapidly, requiring emergency intervention (Boettger et al., 2015).

     

     

    ORDER A CUSTOM-WRITTEN PAPER NOW

     

    References

    Boettger, S., Jenewein, J., & Breitbart, W. (2015). Haloperidol, risperidone, olanzapine and aripiprazole in the management of delirium: A comparison of efficacy, safety, and side effects.
    Palliative & Supportive Care
    ,
    13
    (4), 1079–1085. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951514001059

    Calebiro, D., & Grimes, J. (2020). G Protein-Coupled Receptor Pharmacology at the Single-Molecule Level.
    Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology
    ,
    60
    , 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010919-023348

    Camprodon, J. A., & Roffman, J. L. (2016). Psychiatric neuroscience: Incorporating pathophysiology into clinical case formulation. T. A. Stern, M. Favo, T. E. Wilens, & J. F. Rosenbaum. (Eds.),
    Massachusetts General Hospital psychopharmacology and neurotherapeutics.
    Elsevier.

    Peedicayil J. (2020). The Potential Role of Epigenetic Drugs in the Treatment of Anxiety Disorders.
    Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
    ,
    16
    , 597–606. doi: https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S242040

    Weir, C. J. (2020). Ion channels, receptors, agonists and antagonists.
    Anaesthesia & Intensive Care Medicine
    ,
    21
    (1), 62–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mpaic.2019.10.022

    Yu, A. M., Ingelman-Sundberg, M., Cherrington, N. J., Aleksunes, L. M., Ulrich M. Zanger, U. M., Xie, W., Jeong, H., Morgan, E. M., Turnbaugh, P. J., Klaassen, C. D., Aadra P. Bhatt, A. P., Redinbo, M. R., Hao, P., Waxman, D. J., Wang, L., & Zhong, X. B. (2017). Regulation of drug metabolism and toxicity by multiple factors of genetics, epigenetics, lncRNAs, gut microbiota, and diseases: a meeting report of the 21st International Symposium on Microsomes and Drug Oxidations (MDO).
    Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B
    ,
    7
    (2), 241–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsb.2016.12.006

  • Assessing and Treating Pediatric Clients With Mood Disorders Essay Assignment Papers

    Assessing and Treating Pediatric Clients With Mood Disorders Essay Assignment Papers

    Week 2: Therapy for Pediatric Clients With Mood Disorders

    Mood disorders can impact every facet of a child’s life, making the most basic activities difficult for clients and their families. This was the case for 13-year-old Kara, who was struggling at home and at school. For more than 8 years, Kara suffered from temper tantrums, impulsiveness, inappropriate behavior, difficulty in judgment, and sleep issues. As a psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner working with pediatric clients, you must be able to assess whether these symptoms are caused by psychological, social, or underlying growth and development issues. You must then be able recommend appropriate therapies. Assessing and Treating Pediatric Clients With Mood Disorders Essay Assignment Papers

    This week, as you examine antidepressant therapies, you explore the assessment and treatment of pediatric clients with mood disorders. You also consider ethical and legal implications of these therapies.

    ORDER A CUSTOM-WRITTEN PAPER NOW

    Assignment: Assessing and Treating Pediatric Clients With Mood Disorders

    When pediatric clients present with mood disorders, the process of assessing, diagnosing, and treating them can be quite complex. Children not only present with different signs and symptoms than adult clients with the same disorders, but they also metabolize medications much differently. As a result, psychiatric mental health nurse practitioners must exercise caution when prescribing psychotropic medications to these clients. For this Assignment, as you examine the client case study in this week’s Learning Resources, consider how you might assess and treat pediatric clients presenting with mood disorders. Assessing and Treating Pediatric Clients With Mood Disorders Essay Assignment Papers

    Note: This Assignment is the first of 10 assignments that are based on interactive client case studies. For these assignments, you will be required to make decisions about how to assess and treat clients. Each of your decisions will have a consequence. Some consequences will be insignificant, and others may be life altering. You are not expected to make the “right” decision every time; in fact, some scenarios may not have a “right” decision. You are, however, expected to learn from each decision you make and demonstrate the ability to weigh risks versus benefits to prescribe appropriate treatments for clients. Assessing and Treating Pediatric Clients With Mood Disorders Essay Assignment Papers .

    Learning Objectives

    Students will:

    Assess client factors and history to develop personalized plans of antidepressant therapy for pediatric clients

    Analyze factors that influence pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes in pediatric clients requiring antidepressant therapy

    Evaluate efficacy of treatment plans

    Analyze ethical and legal implications related to prescribing antidepressant therapy to pediatric clients

    Learning Resources

    Note:
     To access this week’s required library resources, please click on the link to the Course Readings List, found in the 
    Course Materials
     section of your Syllabus. Assessing and Treating Pediatric Clients With Mood Disorders Essay Assignment Papers

    Required Readings

    Note:
    All Stahl resources can be accessed through the Walden Library using this link. This link will take you to a log-in page for the Walden Library. Once you log into the library, the Stahl website will appear.

    Stahl, S. M. (2013).
    Stahl’s essential psychopharmacology: Neuroscientific basis and practical applications
    (4th ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

     

    Note:
    To access the following chapters, click on the
    Essential Psychopharmacology, 4th ed
    tab on the Stahl Online website and select the appropriate chapter. Be sure to read all sections on the left navigation bar for each chapter. Assessing and Treating Pediatric Clients With Mood Disorders Essay Assignment Papers

    Chapter 6, “Mood Disorders”

    Chapter 7, “Antidepressants”

    Stahl, S. M. (2014b).
    The prescriber’s guide
    (5th ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

     

    Note:
    To access the following medications, click on the
    The Prescriber’s Guide, 5th ed
    tab on the Stahl Online website and select the appropriate chapter. Be sure to read all sections on the left navigation bar for each chapter. Assessing and Treating Pediatric Clients With Mood Disorders Essay Assignment Papers

     

    Review the following medications:

    amitriptyline

    bupropion

    citalopram

    clomipramine

    desipramine

    desvenlafaxine

    doxepin

    duloxetine

    escitalopram

    fluoxetine

    fluvoxamine

    imipramine

    ketamine

    mirtazapine

    nortriptyline

    paroxetine

    selegiline

    sertraline

    trazodone

    venlafaxine

    vilazodone

    vortioxetine

    Magellan Health, Inc. (2013). Appropriate use of psychotropic drugs in children and adolescents: A clinical monograph. Retrieved from http://www.magellanhealth.com/media/445492/magellan-psychotropicdrugs-0203141.pdf

    Rao, U. (2013). Biomarkers in pediatric depression. Depression & Anxiety, 30(9), 787–791. doi:10.1002/da.22171

    Note:
    Retrieved from Walden Library databases.

    Vitiello, B. (2012). Principles in using psychotropic medication in children and adolescents. In J. M. Rey (Ed.),
    IACAPAP e-Textbook of Child and Adolescent Mental Health.
    Geneva: International Association for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Allied Professions. Retrieved from http://iacapap.org/wp-content/uploads/A.7-PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY-072012.pdf

    Poznanski, E., & Mokros, H. (1996). Child Depression Rating Scale–Revised. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.

    Note:
    Retrieved from Walden Library databases.

    Required Media

    Laureate Education (2016e).
    Case study: An African American child suffering from depression
    [Interactive media file]. Baltimore, MD: Author. Assessing and Treating Pediatric Clients With Mood Disorders Essay Assignment Papers

     

    Note:
    This case study will serve as the foundation for this week’s Assignment.

    Optional Resources

    El Marroun, H., White, T., Verhulst, F., & Tiemeier, H. (2014). Maternal use of antidepressant or anxiolytic medication during pregnancy and childhood neurodevelopmental outcomes: A systematic review.
    European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 23
    (10), 973–992. doi:10.1007/s00787-014-0558-3

    Gordon, M. S., & Melvin, G. A. (2014). Do antidepressants make children and adolescents suicidal?
    Journal of Pediatrics and Child Health, 50
    (11), 847–854. doi:10.1111/jpc.12655

    Seedat, S. (2014). Controversies in the use of antidepressants in children and adolescents: A decade since the storm and where do we stand now?
    Journal of Child & Adolescent Mental Health, 26
    (2), iii–v. doi:10.2989/17280583.2014.938497

    To prepare for this Assignment:

    Review this week’s Learning Resources. Consider how to assess and treat pediatric clients requiring antidepressant therapy. Assessing and Treating Pediatric Clients With Mood Disorders Essay Assignment Papers

    The Assignment

    Examine
     Case Study: An African American Child Suffering From Depression
    . You will be asked to make three decisions concerning the medication to prescribe to this client. Be sure to consider factors that might impact the client’s pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes.

    At each decision point stop to complete the following:

    Decision #1

    Which decision did you select?

    Why did you select this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.

    What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.

    Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with Decision #1 and the results of the decision. Why were they different?

    Decision #2

    Why did you select this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.

    What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.

    Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with Decision #2 and the results of the decision. Why were they different?

    Decision #3

    Why did you select this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.

    What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.

    Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with Decision #3 and the results of the decision. Why were they different?

    Also include how ethical considerations might impact your treatment plan and communication with clients.

    Note:
     Support your rationale with a minimum of three academic resources. While you may use the course text to support your rationale, it will not count toward the resource requirement. Assessing and Treating Pediatric Clients With Mood Disorders Essay Assignment Papers

    By Day 7

    Submit your Assignment.

    Submission and Grading Information

    To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

    Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK2Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.

    Click the 
    Week 2 Assignment Rubric 
    to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.

    Click the 
    Week 2 Assignment 
    link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.

    Next, from the Attach File area, click on the 
    Browse My Computer
     button. Find the document you saved as “WK2Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click 
    Open
    .

    If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for 
    I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database
    .

    Click on the 
    Submit
     button to complete your submission. Assessing and Treating Pediatric Clients With Mood Disorders Essay Assignment Papers

    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Week 2 Assignment Rubric

    Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

    To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

    Submit your Week 2 Assignment draft and review the originality report.

    Submit Your Assignment by Day 7

    To submit your Assignment:

    Week 2 Assignment

    Making Connections

    Now that you have:

    Assessed pediatric clients presenting with mood disorders

    Developed personalized plans of antidepressant therapy for pediatric clients

    Examined factors that influence pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes in pediatric clients requiring antidepressant therapy. Assessing and Treating Pediatric Clients With Mood Disorders Essay Assignment Papers .

    Explored ethical and legal implications of prescribing antidepressant therapy to pediatric clients

    Next week, you will build on your assessment and treatment skills as you examine adult and geriatric clients presenting for antidepressant therapy. Assessing and Treating Pediatric Clients With Mood Disorders Essay Assignment Papers

  • Assessing and Treating Clients with With Bipolar Disorder Essay Assignment Paper – Bipolar Therapy

    Assessing and Treating Clients with With Bipolar Disorder Essay Assignment Paper

    Week 4: Bipolar Therapy

    Jay, an 18-year-old high school senior, presents with symptoms of difficulty sleeping and feeling sad, which results in an initial diagnosis of depression. His mother later reports, however, that Jay exhibits symptoms of irritability and risk-taking behaviors. (His little brother reported to his mother that they were driving over 90 miles an hour on the highway.) After further evaluation, Jay’s psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner diagnosed him with bipolar disorder.

    Cases like this are not uncommon with bipolar disorder, as initial assessments rarely provides all the information needed. In your role, as a psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner, you must develop strategies for properly assessing and diagnosing these clients because treatments for bipolar disorder are significantly different than treatments for depression or other mood disorders.

    This week, as you examine bipolar therapies, you explore the assessment and treatment of clients with bipolar disorder. You also consider ethical and legal implications of these therapies.

    ORDER A CUSTOM-WRITTEN PAPER NOW

    Assignment: Assessing and Treating Clients with With Bipolar Disorder

    Bipolar disorder is a unique disorder that causes shifts in mood and energy, which results in depression and mania for clients. Proper diagnosis of this disorder is often a challenge for two reasons: 1) clients often present as depressive or manic, but may have both; and 2) many symptoms of bipolar disorder are similar to other disorders. Misdiagnosis is common, making it essential for you to have a deep understanding of the disorder’s pathophysiology. For this Assignment, as you examine the client case study in this week’s Learning Resources, consider how you might assess and treat clients presenting with bipolar disorder. Assessing and Treating Clients with With Bipolar Disorder Essay Assignment Paper.

    Learning Objectives

    Students will:

    Assess client factors and history to develop personalized plans of bipolar therapy for clients

    Analyze factors that influence pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes in clients requiring bipolar therapy

    Evaluate efficacy of treatment plans

    Analyze ethical and legal implications related to prescribing bipolar therapy to clients across the lifespan

    Learning Resources

    Note:
     To access this week’s required library resources, please click on the link to the Course Readings List, found in the 
    Course Materials
     section of your Syllabus.

    Required Readings

    Note:
    All Stahl resources can be accessed through the Walden Library using this link. This link will take you to a log-in page for the Walden Library. Once you log into the library, the Stahl website will appear.

    Stahl, S. M. (2013).
    Stahl’s essential psychopharmacology: Neuroscientific basis and practical applications
    (4th ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

     

    To access the following chapters, click on the
    Essential Psychopharmacology, 4th ed
    tab on the Stahl Online website and select the appropriate chapter. Be sure to read all sections on the left navigation bar for each chapter. Assessing and Treating Clients with With Bipolar Disorder Essay Assignment Paper.

    Chapter 6, “Mood Disorders”

    Chapter 8, “Mood Stabilizers”

    Stahl, S. M., & Ball, S. (2009b).
    Stahl’s illustrated mood stabilizers.
    New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

     

    To access the following chapters, click on the
    Illustrated Guides
    tab and then the
    Mood Stabilizers
    tab.

    Chapter 4, “Lithium and Various Anticonvulsants as Mood Stabilizers for Bipolar Disorder”

    Chapter 5, “Atypical Antipsychotics as Mood Stabilizers for Bipolar Disorder”

    Vitiello, B. (2013). How effective are the current treatments for children diagnosed with manic/mixed bipolar disorder?
    CNS Drugs, 27
    (5), 331-333. doi:10.1007/s40263-013-0060-3

    Note:
    Retrieved from Walden Library databases.

    Chen, R., Wang, H., Shi, J., Shen, K., & Hu, P. (2015). Cytochrome P450 2D6 genotype affects the pharmacokinetics of controlled-release paroxetine in healthy Chinese subjects: comparison of traditional phenotype and activity score systems.
    European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 71
    (7), 835-841. doi:10.1007/s00228-015-1855-6

    Note:
    Retrieved from Walden Library databases.

    Required Media

    Laureate Education. (2016f).
    Case study: An Asian American woman with bipolar disorder
    [Interactive media file]. Baltimore, MD: Author. Assessing and Treating Clients with With Bipolar Disorder Essay Assignment Paper.

     

    Note:
    This case study will serve as the foundation for this week’s Assignment.

    Optional Resources

    Mostafavi, A., Solhi, M., Mohammadi, M., Hamedi, M., Keshavarzi, M., & Akhondzadeh, S. (2014). Melatonin decreases olanzapine induced metabolic side-effects in adolescents with bipolar disorder: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial.
    Acta Medica Iranica, 52
    (10), 734-739.

    Retrieved from http://acta.tums.ac.ir/index.php/acta

    To prepare for this Assignment:

    Review this week’s Learning Resources. Consider how to assess and treat clients requiring bipolar therapy.

    The Assignment

    Examine Case Study: An Asian American Woman With Bipolar Disorder.
     You will be asked to make three decisions concerning the medication to prescribe to this client. Be sure to consider factors that might impact the client’s pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes. Assessing and Treating Clients with With Bipolar Disorder Essay Assignment Paper.

    At each decision point stop to complete the following:

    Decision #1

    Which decision did you select?

    Why did you select this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.

    What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.

    Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with Decision #1 and the results of the decision. Why were they different?

    Decision #2

    Why did you select this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.

    What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.

    Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with Decision #2 and the results of the decision. Why were they different?

    Decision #3

    Why did you select this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.

    What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.

    Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with Decision #3 and the results of the decision. Why were they different? Assessing and Treating Clients with With Bipolar Disorder Essay Assignment Paper.

    Also include how ethical considerations might impact your treatment plan and communication with clients.

    Note:
     Support your rationale with a minimum of three academic resources. While you may use the course text to support your rationale, it will not count toward the resource requirement.

    Submission and Grading Information

    To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

    Save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK4Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.

    Click on the Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.

    Click on the 
    Week 4 Assignment
     link. Next, from the Attach File area, click on the 
    Browse My Computer
     button. Find the document you saved as “WK4Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click on 
    Open
    .

    If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click in the checkbox for 
    I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database
    .

    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Week 4 Assignment Rubric

    Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

    To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

    Submit your Week 4 Assignment draft and review the originality report.

    Submit Your Assignment by Day 7

    To submit your Assignment:

    Week 4 Assignment

    Making Connections

    Now that you have:

    Assessed clients presenting with bipolar disorder

    Developed personalized plans of bipolar therapy for clients

    Examined factors that influence pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes in clients requiring bipolar therapy. Assessing and Treating Clients with With Bipolar Disorder Essay Assignment Paper.

    Explored ethical and legal implications of prescribing bipolar therapy to clients

    Next week, you will build on your assessment and treatment skills as you examine clients presenting for anxiolytic therapy and PTSD treatment. Assessing and Treating Clients with With Bipolar Disorder Essay Assignment Paper