Author: admin

Polypharmacy Discussion Essay

Week 2: Polypharmacy Discussion

Polypharmacy is a common concern, especially in the elderly.

List the definitions of polypharmacy you encounter in your readings. There is more than one.

Discuss three risk factors that can lead to polypharmacy. Explain the rationale for why each listed item is a risk factor. This is different than adverse drug reactions. ADRs can be a result of polypharmacy, and is important, but ADRs are not a risk factor. Polypharmacy Discussion Essay.

Discuss three action steps that a provider can take to prevent polypharmacy.

Provide an example of how your clinical preceptors have addressed polypharmacy.

Week 2: ACC/AHA Guidelines Discussion

ORDER A CUSTOM-WRITTEN PAPER NOW

Please review the following case.

Chief complaint: medication refill “ran out of medicine”

HPI:
BJ, a 68-year-old AA female presents to the clinic for prescription refills. The patient also indicates that she has noticed shortness of breath which started about 3 months ago. The SOB gets worse with activity, especially when she is playing with her grandchildren but it goes away once she sits down to rest. She reports that she is also bothered by shortness of breath that wakes her up at night, but it resolves after sitting upright on 3 pillows. She also has lower leg edema which started 1 week ago. She also indicates that she often feels light headed and faint while going up the stairs, but it subsides after sitting down to rest. She has not tried any OTC medications at home. She never filled her prescriptions, which she received at her checkup 6 months ago, she did not think it was important. Polypharmacy Discussion Essay.

PMH:

Hypertension

Previous history of MI in 2010

Surgeries:

2010-Left Anterior Descending (LAD) cardiac stent placement

Allergies
:
Amoxicillin

Vaccination History:

She receives an annual flu shot. Last flu shot was this year

Has never had a Pneumovax

Has not had a Td in over 20 years

Has not had the herpes zoster vaccine

Social history:

High school graduate, a widow with one son who loves out of state. She drinks one 4-ounce glass of red wine daily. She is a former smoker that stopped 20 years ago. Polypharmacy Discussion Essay.

Family history:

Both parents are deceased. Father died of a heart attack; mother died of natural causes. She had one brother who died of a heart attack 20 years ago at the age of 52.

ROS:

Constitutional: Lightheaded and faint with exertion.

Respiratory: Shortness of breath with exertion (playing with grandchildren and stairs). + Orthopnea

Cardiovascular: + leg and ankle swelling x 1 week

Psychiatric: Not taking medications for 6 months – “ran out”

Physical examination:

Vital Signs

Height: 5 feet 2 inches Weight: 163 pounds BMI: 29.8 BP 150/86 T 98.0 oral P 100 R 22, non-labored;

HEENT
: normocephalic, symmetric. Bilateral cataracts; PERRLA, EOMI; Upper and lower dentures in place a fitting well. No tinnitus

NECK
: Neck supple; non-palpable lymph nodes; no carotid bruits. Thyroid non-palpable

LUNGS
: inspiratory crackles

HEART
: Normal S1 with S2 split during expiration. An S4 is noted at the apex; systolic murmur noted at the right upper sternal border without radiation to the carotids. Polypharmacy Discussion Essay.

ABDOMEN
: Normal contour; active bowel sounds all four quadrants; no palpable masses.

PV: Pulses are 2+ in upper extremities and 1+ in pedal pulses bilaterally. 2+ pitting edema to her knees noted bilaterally

GENITOURINARY
: no CVA tenderness; not examined

MUSCULOSKELETAL
: Heberden’s nodes at the DIP joints of all fingers and crepitus of the bilateral knees on flexion and extension with tenderness to palpation medially at both knees. Kyphosis and gait slow, but steady.

PSYCH
: normal affect; her Mini-Cog Score is 3. Her PHQ-9 score is 22. Polypharmacy Discussion Essay.

SKIN
: Sparse hair noted on lower legs and feet bilaterally with dry skin on her ankles and feet.

Labs
:: Hgb 12.2, Hct 37%, K+ 4.2, Na+140, Cholesterol 230, Triglycerides 188, HDL 37, LDL 190, TSH 3.7, glucose 98 BUN 12 Cr 0.8. Polypharmacy Discussion Essay.

A:

Primary Diagnosis:

Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) (150.9)

Secondary Diagnoses:

Primary Hypertension (I10)

Depression F32.3:

Obesity (E66):

Osteoarthritis (OA) (715.90)

Differential Diagnosis:

Peripheral Vascular Disease (PVD) (173.9)

P:

Medications:

Sertraline 25 mg. Take 1 tab PO QD disp#30, 1 refill

Tylenol 650 mg PO Q4 hours as needed for arthritis pain

Labs:
UA; Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP); LFTs and TSH.

12-lead EKG, Chest X-ray; Initial 2D echo with Doppler; Ankle-brachial index

Education:

Congestive heart failure is caused by the inability of your heart to pump blood effectively enough to meet the demands of your body. If you think of your body as any other pump, if fluid does not move well through the system, then it will back up into other spaces. When blood backs up it puts a lot of pressure on the blood vessels, which forces fluid to leak out into the nearby tissue. With CHF, this fluid usually moves into your lungs, legs, or abdomen. Polypharmacy Discussion Essay.

The signs of worsening CHF include decreased energy level, shortness of breath during your normal routine, increased swelling to your legs and feet, your clothes feel tight, or a wet sounding cough. Call the office if these symptoms occur.

Weigh yourself every morning at the same time. If you have a 3 pound weight gain in 24 hours, or a 5 pound weight gain over a week, you should call the office. Polypharmacy Discussion Essay.

Exercise and maintaining a normal weight is very important. You should try to exercise at least 20-30 minutes a day, more if possible. Start slow with walking.

Decrease your salt intake. Do not add any extra salt to foods. Salt makes you retain fluid, and it makes you want to drink more fluid. Avoid fast food and prepared food as they are usually very high in sodium.

If you notice your legs swelling, elevate them up and rest. Do not drink alcohol and continue to avoid smoking or second hand smoke.

Take your medications as directed, with water. Do not stop them abruptly or skip doses.

I have started you on a medication for depression. It can take 2 weeks to start to feel it working and up to a month until you can fell the real benefits. Polypharmacy Discussion Essay.

If you start to feel more depressed, like you want to harm yourself or others, please contact me right away or got to the ER.

Referrals
: may refer based on lab results

Follow up
: return to office in 2 weeks

Additional lab results:

Echo results: LVEF 39%

BNP – 682 pg/ml

Questions: You determine the medications for CHF/ASCVD

According to the ACC/AHA Guidelines, what is BJ’s heart failure stage?

According to the ACC/AHA Guidelines, what medications should BJ be prescribed?

Does she need any additional medication given her history of MI?

Write her complete prescriptions using the prescription writing format. Polypharmacy Discussion Essay.

Research Critique PICOT Statement Paper Example

PICOT statement

Population: Patients in an acute care setting

Intervention: Does hourly rounding

Comparison: Compared to responding to call lights

Outcome: Reduce the rate of patient fall incidents

Timeline: During patient stay at hospital

Question: Does hourly rounding reduce the rate of patient fall incidents and consequential injuries?

Patients in an acute care setting (P), does hourly rounding (I), compared to responding to call lights (C), reduce the rate of patient fall incidents (O), during patient stay at hospital (T)? Research critique picot statement paper example.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Introduction

Patient falls are a common occurrence within the hospitals especially within the critical care unit. Patient fall can be described as a situation in which a patient falls from a resting bed or falls as he or she attempts to walk within the unit. Patient fall may be caused by many factors such as polypharmacy, failure in diagnosis and failure in assessment of the patient by the care giver. All the same, there have been tireless efforts by the hospital administrators, nurses as well as researchers to try and get a lasting solution to minimize patient fall. There have been technological introductions such as the call lights which are fixed at the patient bed so that the patient may use them to seek for help from care givers or the nurses when they are feeling uncomfortable and need immediate attention. However, due to scarcity of nursing personnel in our hospitals, some call lights takes longer to be responded to. Another way boosting the hourly rounding is by increasing the number of staffs to increase the rate of rounding per day to ensure there is enough surveillance within the unit. These include monitoring and occasional assessment of the patient. However, there is no single most effective method of preventing patient fall and a combination of technology based methods as well as hourly rounding paramount in reducing patient fall. Research critique picot statement paper example.

Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations

The author sought to establish if the call light use rate and the average time to call light can affect the rate of falls and consequential injuries in an acute care setting. The author used archived data from the hospital to find out if the rate at which the call light was used and the average response time would contribute to patient falls and serious injuries as a result. The researchers were able to establish that high rate of patient calls resulted in less patient fall and prevented injuries (Tzeng & Yin, 2009). They also found that high rate of call light use led to longer response times, although the longer response to call light was lesser the fall rate and injuries. The authors were clear in the statement of the problem as well as the research questions (Tzeng & Yin, 2009). The methods used adequately adhered to the ethics of medical practice. The findings presented by the authors are meaningful and highly applicable in the acute care setting to prevent high patient fall and consequential injuries by responding to call lights as signaled by the patients. Research critique picot statement paper example.

This paper will conduct an appraisal of the study Tzeng & Yin (2009) so as to determine its findings and how they can be applied in nursing practice. It shall also establish the methods of study and determine whether the researchers considered ethical issues while conducting the study.

 

Research Critique Guidelines

To write a critical appraisal that demonstrates comprehension of the research study conducted, address each component below for qualitative study in the Topic 2 assignment and the quantitative study in the Topic 3 assignment. Research critique picot statement paper example.

Successful completion of this assignment requires that you provide a rationale, include examples, or reference content from the study in your responses.

Qualitative Study

Background of Study:

· Identify the clinical problem and research problem that led to the study. What was not known about the clinical problem that, if understood, could be used to improve health care delivery or patient outcomes? This gap in knowledge is the research problem. Research critique picot statement paper example.

· How did the author establish the significance of the study? In other words, why should the reader care about this study? Look for statements about human suffering, costs of treatment, or the number of people affected by the clinical problem.

· Identify the purpose of the study. An author may clearly state the purpose of the study or may describe the purpose as the study goals, objectives, or aims.

· List research questions that the study was designed to answer. If the author does not explicitly provide the questions, attempt to infer the questions from the answers.

· Were the purpose and research questions related to the problem?

Method of Study:

· Were qualitative methods appropriate to answer the research questions?

· Did the author identify a specific perspective from which the study was developed? If so, what was it?

· Did the author cite quantitative and qualitative studies relevant to the focus of the study? What other types of literature did the author include?

· Are the references current? For qualitative studies, the author may have included studies older than the 5-year limit typically used for quantitative studies. Findings of older qualitative studies may be relevant to a qualitative study. Research critique picot statement paper example.

· Did the author evaluate or indicate the weaknesses of the available studies?

· Did the literature review include adequate information to build a logical argument?

· When a researcher uses the grounded theory method of qualitative inquiry, the researcher may develop a framework or diagram as part of the findings of the study. Was a framework developed from the study findings?

Results of Study

· What were the study findings?

· What are the implications to nursing?

· Explain how the findings contribute to nursing knowledge/science. Would this impact practice, education, administration, or all areas of nursing? Research critique picot statement paper example.

Ethical Considerations

· Was the study approved by an Institutional Review Board?

· Was patient privacy protected?

· Were there ethical considerations regarding the treatment or lack of?

Conclusion

· Emphasize the importance and congruity of the thesis statement.

· Provide a logical wrap-up to bring the appraisal to completion and to leave a lasting impression and take-away points useful in nursing practice.

· Incorporate a critical appraisal and a brief analysis of the utility and applicability of the findings to nursing practice. Research critique picot statement paper example.

· Integrate a summary of the knowledge learned.

Quantitative Study

Background of Study:

· Identify the clinical problem and research problem that led to the study. What was not known about the clinical problem that, if understood, could be used to improve health care delivery or patient outcomes? This gap in knowledge is the research problem.

· How did the author establish the significance of the study? In other words, why should the reader care about this study? Look for statements about human suffering, costs of treatment, or the number of people affected by the clinical problem. Research critique picot statement paper example.

· Identify the purpose of the study. An author may clearly state the purpose of the study or may describe the purpose as the study goals, objectives, or aims.

· List research questions that the study was designed to answer. If the author does not explicitly provide the questions, attempt to infer the questions from the answers.

· Were the purpose and research questions related to the problem?

Methods of Study

· Identify the benefits and risks of participation addressed by the authors. Were there benefits or risks the authors do not identify?

· Was informed consent obtained from the subjects or participants?

· Did it seem that the subjects participated voluntarily in the study?

· Was institutional review board approval obtained from the agency in which the study was conducted?

· Are the major variables (independent and dependent variables) identified and defined? What were these variables?

· How were data collected in this study?

· What rationale did the author provide for using this data collection method?

· Identify the time period for data collection of the study.

· Describe the sequence of data collection events for a participant.

· Describe the data management and analysis methods used in the study.

· Did the author discuss how the rigor of the process was assured? For example, does the author describe maintaining a paper trail of critical decisions that were made during the analysis of the data? Was statistical software used to ensure accuracy of the analysis? Research critique picot statement paper example.

· What measures were used to minimize the effects of researcher bias (their experiences and perspectives)? For example, did two researchers independently analyze the data and compare their analyses?

Results of Study

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

· What is the researcher’s interpretation of findings?

· Are the findings valid or an accurate reflection of reality? Do you have confidence in the findings?

· What limitations of the study were identified by researchers?

· Was there a coherent logic to the presentation of findings?

· What implications do the findings have for nursing practice? For example, can the findings of the study be applied to general nursing practice, to a specific population, or to a specific area of nursing? Research critique picot statement paper example.

· What suggestions are made for further studies?

Ethical Considerations

· Was the study approved by an Institutional Review Board?

· Was patient privacy protected?

· Were there ethical considerations regarding the treatment or lack of?

Conclusion

· Emphasize the importance and congruity of the thesis statement.

· Provide a logical wrap-up to bring the appraisal to completion and to leave a lasting impression and take-away points useful in nursing practice.

· Incorporate a critical appraisal and a brief analysis of the utility and applicability of the findings to nursing practice.

· Integrate a summary of the knowledge learned.

Reference

Burns, N., & Grove, S. (2011). 
Understanding nursing research
 (5th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.

research critique picot statement paper example

 

RESEARCH CRITIQUE AND PICOT (EBP)

Evidence-based practice (EBP) is basically a framework for clinical decision making that motivates clinicians to integrate information from research that is highly qualitative and quantitative involving the expertise and the background of the clinician and the client respectively in addition to values and preferences. EBP is gaining popularity in most disciplines of health care. Among its characteristics is the dependence on the interaction between clinical expertise, complex scientific evidence and choices and needs of individual evidence. Librarians have crucial responsibility and are vital to the advancement of EBP in that they identify and retrieve correct and needed literature from different sources for making health care based decision. This paper gives a critical analysis an EBP article published in The New York Times that mainly writes about the rising preference of asthmatic cases in children and the probability of oil from fish lowering /preventing the problem. The critique also gives the article’s supporting content. The content of the article is of importance specially for clinicians who have interest in Evidence based practice (EBP) (McKibbon, 1998). Research critique picot statement paper example.

Asthma is a chronic respiratory disease associated with acute pain. Acute pain is a chief health concern in the hospital and the clinicians find it difficult to manage the pain experiences of their patients. Right management and assessment of pain is required for all patients. For this reason, controlling pain in a poor manner can weaken and slow down the recovery of patients from such pain in addition to distressing members of the family and lowering well-being of the sense. Fear that overuse of analgesic might prolong recovery and pain is still there.  It is therefore of importance to learn the best ways to do away with the disease (Elsevier Nursing Suite, 2011)

On December 28th last year, 2016, on the New York Times, Denise Grady wrote probability of oil from fish to lower the risks of expectant mothers giving birth to asthmatic children. On his article, he provides an account of a Danish study to determine the effect of pregnant women taking fish oil on their to-be-born children in relation to asthma. In this study, 2.4 grams of fish oil was fed to expectant mothers daily. The study showed that mothers who took the oil in their last trimester of pregnancy significantly lowered the probability of their children who have asthma. The Denmark study proved a seven percent reduction in the risk of suffering from asthma for children born out of mothers who had fed on fish oil (Grady, 2016). Research critique picot statement paper example.

A later study that was released on 27th December 2016 advised against the regular taking of fish oil. This study found no associated complication resulting from the intake, but they claimed that the dosage was high, fifteen-twenty times more that the average daily consumption (Grady, 2016).

In his article, Denise quotes Dr. Hans Bisgaard’s email that recommended a test in fish oils before accepting for use by pregnant mothers. Bisgaard is a pediatrics professor at the University of Copenhagen. The rise in the asthmatic cases has caused alarm leading to medics spending sleepless nights looking for the cure for the chronic disease. Dr. Bisgaard explained the lack of possibility to tell the benefit of expectant mothers taking more fish oil. Besides this, pregnant mothers are also advised against taking fish high in the food chain due to their high concentration of mercury (Grady, 2016).

In the article another doctor and researcher, Dr. Christopher E. Ramsden praised the study and its findings but claimed that the researchers were too fast to make their findings public. The Danish researchers had been motivated by earlier researchers on the possibility of fish oil reducing risks to asthma. The researchers had not tested the idea. Hence the Danish researchers decided to test it(Grady, 2016).

The study is of significant importance in the medical field, but as with any remedy, if not well practiced and applied, it may lead to more harm than good. Taking too much of the fish oil may saturate the body with it which may result in other health complications. The fact that no complications have been associated with the intake of fish oils does not make it clean free of any complications. Consumers of the oils should do so with caution and should avoid their over intake. Research critique picot statement paper example.

The Danish study provides a significant ground to the study of the benefits of fish oil but on the other hand potentially exposes the individuals participating in the experiment into great danger. The researchers confess that the amount of fish oil take by the pregnant mothers under study is by far higher than the normal human consumption. This exposes the mothers as well as their expected children to unknown outcome, which may turn vital to their health due to the high levels of oil intake. Further, the researchers propose a continued intake of the oils without a proper inquest into the probable negative outcomes of its intake.

Dr. Christopher view of the problem is of a more inclusive approach and more “mature”. He praises the study but recommends a deeper investigation of the matter before releasing it for public consumption. There is need for improvement in EBP and transformation of healthcare means there is an urgency efficient, effective and safe care redesigning. With several national experts’ recommendations which are aimed at setting directions, nurses have resorted to starting programs and initiatives that increase the nurses’ contributions which they have made are capable of making and are to make to meet the EBP promise. Such initiatives are realignment of education and curricular, development of model and theory, scientific research and practice adoption (Stevens, 2013).

One of the most recent examples is reliable cardiac treatment through the administration of data feedback (Hyson, 2009). The study reports of a negative trial in an effort to improve the performance of hospitals on cardiac care key indicators using administrative data feedback.

A recent article describes the challenges in implementing proof on the audit from scientific review and feedback interventions to cognitive process concerning the best feedback and audit to use in efforts of intervention in the future (Brown et al., 2009) . The authors explain their incapability to gather info on major aspects of conducting feedback and audit from their revealed literature. Due to this, very little knowledge is gained from previous studies apart from complete or semi-failure in their trials (Aarons et al., 2011). Research critique picot statement paper example.

Once a theory is employed to regulate a study, it should then be for the most part unheeded within the growth of methods and choice of tools. An opposing  instance to the existing approach is that  of modeling method  in  analysis Implementation study, a uniting effort by researchers living in North American which, opens up researchers in Britain to engage in proposals  to construct and take a look at tools to live and operationalize ideas from a rigorously select class of behavior amendment theories, then take a look at the link between the ideas as theorized and therefore the quantity of amendment determined within the specific areas of the study.

There are several various theories that describe processes contributive to structure amendment. However, structural amendment theories seldom apply to activities planned on the amendment, of most importance is that once  are done within the expected guideline they don’t bare a negative effect on the organization as a whole.

Importance of theory in constructing models

A completely developed theory, within the perspective of behavior amendment, answers the question: why does structure or folks depict such a behavior? Given the approach, they behave, what would inspire them to alter behavior? Additionally, it should incorporate structure problems, theory ought to give premises and steering to action at an individual level as well as better organizational levels. Research critique picot statement paper example.

Necessity of strategy in identifying model

A directing methodology which bolsters the basic hypothesis or speculations managing the study mapping technique to mediations is critical. Here the writing on intercessions in advancing confirmation based take after execution is valuable. There’s a broad catalog of involvements, with info regarding what seems to be a lot of or ineffective.

Nevertheless, it’s open that ineffectiveness may be attributable to many factors, such as  Lack of tight linkage to theory, in addition to the loose linkage to drawback designation will lower the chance of thriving implementation (Naylor et al 2011).

PICOT Question

A  PICOT question rubs together the entire research into a simple precise statement.
P
in the mnemonic refer to the targeted population study,
I
is the projected intervention,
C
is the comparative research studies to other present studies,
O
is for the research study findings and T is the length of Time in doing the research. Research critique picot statement paper example.

QUESTION:
(ETIOLOGY RESEARCH DESIGN)
: 
In children at their early development age (P) how are parents who did not take fish oil in their later period of gestation(I) compare to those parents who took fish oil in their later period of pregnancy (C) at risk of giving birth to more asthmatic children (O) in their early lives of development (T).

 

 

REFERENCES

 

Aarons, G., Hurlburt, M., & Horwitz, M. (2011).Advancing a conceptual model of evidence-based practice implementation in public service sectors. 
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
, 
38
(1), 4-23.

Brown, E., Wickline.,Ecoff, & Glaser, (2009). Nursing practice, knowledge, attitudes and perceived barriers to evidence‐based practice at an academic medical center. 
Journal of advanced nursing
, 
65
(2), 371-381.

Evidence-Based Practice: Managing Acute Pain – Elsevier Nursing Suite. (2011, November). Retrieved from www.confidenceconnected.com/…/evidence-based_practice_managing_acute_pain/

Grady, Denise. “Taking Fish Oil During Pregnancy Is Found to Lower Child’s Asthma Risk.”
The New York Times
.The New York Times, 2016.Web. 03 Jan. 2017. .

Hysong, S. J. (2009). Meta-analysis: audit & feedback features impact effectiveness on care quality. 
Medical care
, 
47
(3), 356.

 

PICOT Statement

The PICOT statement will provide a framework for your capstone project (the project students must complete during their final course in the RN-BSN program of study).

Read the PICOT article “Evidence-Based Practice, Step by Step: Asking the Clinical Question: A Key Step in Evidence-Based Practice” along with the “Chapter 18: Using Research in Evidence-Based

Nursing Practice” PowerPoint resource. Research critique picot statement paper example.

The first step of the EBP process is to develop a question from the practice problem you drafted in Topic 1. Start with the patient and identify the clinical problems or issues that arise from

clinical care. Consider the research critique as you draft your PICOT statement.

Following the PICOT format, write a PICOT statement in an area of interest to you, which is applicable to your proposed capstone project.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. Research critique picot statement paper example.

Question description

Review the feedback from your instructor on the Topic 3 assignment, Benchmark – Research Critique and PICOT Statement Rough Draft. Use the feedback to make appropriate revisions and submit your final draft of 1,500-1,750 words.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. Research critique picot statement paper example.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

Rubic

Research Critique and PICOT Statement Final Draft 

1

Unsatisfactory 0-71%

0.00%

2

Less Than Satisfactory 72-75%

75.00%

3

Satisfactory 76-79%

79.00%

4

Good 80-89%

89.00%

5

Excellent 90-100%

100.00%

65.0 %
Content

3.0 %
 
Research Problem and Purpose

The research problem or purpose of study is not mentioned.

There are some inaccuracies in describing the research problem.

The research problem and purpose are present and mostly accurate. Research critique picot statement paper example.

The research problem and purpose are described with reference to nursing.

The problem and purpose of the study are clearly articulated, and their importance to nursing is addressed.

3.0 %
 
Research Objective, Questions, or Hypotheses

The research objective, questions, or hypotheses are not mentioned. Does not mention research objective, questions or hypotheses.

There are some inaccuracies describing the research objective, questions or hypotheses.

The research objective, questions, or hypotheses are present and mostly accurate.

The research objective, questions, or hypotheses are described and related to study methods.

Research question is clearly and accurately described and is congruent with research purpose, method, and worldview of researcher.

3.0 %
 
Literature Review

Literature review is not mentioned.

There are some inaccuracies describing the literature review.

The literature review elements are discussed and support the purpose of the study. Research critique picot statement paper example.

The literature review and how it supports the purpose of the study are described.

The literature review critique is thorough and clear, and supports the purpose and research question.

3.0 %
Conceptual/Theoretical Framework – Qualitative

The conceptual/theoretical framework is not mentioned.

There are some inaccuracies in describing the conceptual/theoretical framework.

The conceptual/theoretical framework elements are present and mostly accurate.

The conceptual/theoretical framework is described.

The conceptual/theoretical framework is thorough, clear, and accurately described using research terminology.

3.0 %
 
Protection of Human Participants

Protection of human participants is not critiqued.

Some of the study tools are critiqued. Ethical issues are not addressed for quantitative design.

The study tools are critiqued. Ethical issues are discussed for quantitative design.

The study tools are critiqued using research terminology. Ethical issues are addressed for quantitative design.

The study tools are thorough, clear and accurately critiqued using research terminology. Ethical issues are addressed for quantitative design.

3.0 %
 
Data Collection

Data collection methods are not critiqued.

Data collection methods are critiqued, but not to the full extent or not including ethical issues.

Data collection methods and potential biases are reviewed. Ethical issues are described. Interview or data collection processes are presented.

Data collection methods are critiqued and potential biases are reviewed. Ethical issues are described. Interview or data collection processes are critiqued.

Data collection methods are fully critiqued, and potential biases are addressed. Potential ethical issues, interview or data collection processes are critiqued.

5.0 %
 
Problem Statement in PICOT Format

No problem statement is provided.

The critique of the problem statement is provided, but is missing criteria as indicated in the writing guidelines. There are some inaccuracies describing the elements associated with the PICOT statement.

The critique of the problem statement meets all criteria of the writing guidelines. The PICOT is present and most of the elements and description are mostly accurate. Research critique picot statement paper example.

The critique of the problem statement meets all criteria of the writing guidelines in a detailed and comprehensive manner. The PICOT statement is described and related to the research question or problem of the study.

The critique of the problem statement meets all criteria of the writing guidelines in a detailed and comprehensive manner while demonstrating deeper understanding by incorporating prior learning or thoughtful reflection. The PICOT statement is clearly and accurately described and is congruent with the description of the research question or problem of the study.

3.0 %
 
Data Analysis or Data Management

Data analysis or management is not critiqued.

Data analysis is described. Significance and nonsignificance are explained; generalization and implications to nursing practice are not fully addressed. Conclusions are vague.

Data analysis is described and linked to research questions. Results are explained, and implications to nursing practice are reviewed. Conclusions are presented.

Data analysis is critiqued and tied to research questions. Results are explained. Generalization and implications to nursing practice are reviewed. Conclusions are tied back to purpose of study.

Data analysis is accurately critiqued and linked to research questions. Significance and nonsignificance are explained. Generalization and implications to nursing practice are reviewed. Conclusions are tied back to purpose of study and literature review.

6.0 %
 
Implications for Practice and Future Research

The quality of the study and implications for nursing practice and future research are not addressed.

The quality of the study and implications for nursing practice and future research are mentioned but not fully addressed.

The quality of the study and implications for nursing practice and future research are addressed and explained.

The quality of the study and implications for nursing practice and future research are addressed and explained with specific suggestions mentioned.

The quality of the study and implications for nursing practice and future research are addressed and explained in detail, including specific suggestions.

3.0 %
 
Conclusion

Conclusion does not summarize a critical appraisal and applicability of findings.

Conclusion is vague and does not discuss importance to nursing. Research critique picot statement paper example.

Conclusion summarizes utility of the research and importance to nursing practice.

Conclusion summarizes utility of the research from the critical appraisal and the findings importance to nursing practice.

Conclusion summarizes utility of the research from the critical appraisal, knowledge learned, and the importance of the findings to nursing practice.

5.0 %
 
Identifies a Nursing Practice Problem

A nursing practice problem is not clearly described.

PICOT describes a nursing practice problem but lacks reliable sources.

A nursing practice problem is described with a few reliable sources.

PICOT articulates a nursing practice problem using supporting information from reliable sources.

PICOT clearly articulates a problem relevant to nursing practice. PICOT supports the nursing practice problem with current research.

5.0 %
 
PICOT Statement, Research Article, and Nursing Practice Problem Link

Discussion of the link between the PICOT statement, research articles, and nursing practice problem is not included.

Discussion of the link between the PICOT statement, research articles, and nursing practice problem is incomplete or incorrect.

Discussion of the link between the PICOT statement, research articles, and nursing practice problem is included but lacks relevant details and supporting explanation.

Discussion of the link between the PICOT statement, research articles, and nursing practice problem is complete and includes relevant details and supporting explanation.

Discussion of the link between the PICOT statement, research articles, and nursing practice problem is extremely thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive supporting explanation.

5.0 %
 
Proposed Evidence-Based Practice Change

The proposed evidence-based practice change is not included.

The proposed evidence-based practice change is incomplete or incorrect.

The proposed evidence-based practice change is included but lacks supporting explanation and relevant details.

The proposed evidence-based practice change is complete and includes supporting explanation and relevant details.

The proposed evidence-based practice change is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting explanation and numerous relevant details.

15.0 %
 
Evidence of Revision

Final paper does not demonstrate incorporation of feedback or evidence of revision.

Incorporation of feedback or evidence of revision is incomplete.

Incorporation of feedback and evidence of revision are present.

Evidence of incorporation of feedback and revision is clearly provided.

Evidence of incorporation of feedback and revision is comprehensive and thoroughly developed.

30.0 %
Organization and Effectiveness

Research critique picot statement paper example

10.0 %
 
Thesis Development and Purpose

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

10.0 %
 
Argument Logic and Construction

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

10.0 %
 
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

5.0 %
Format

2.0 %
 
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.

Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

All format elements are correct.

3.0 %
 
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)Research critique picot statement paper example

Sources are not documented. Research critique picot statement paper example

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

100 %
 
Total Weightage. Research critique picot statement paper example

Nursing Care Models Essay Assignment paper – NR447: RN Collaborative Healthcare

Nursing Care Models Paper:

Guidelines

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to identify nursing care models utilized in today’s various health care settings and enhance your knowledge of how models impact the management of care and may influence delegation. You will assess the effectiveness of models and determine how you would collaborate with a nurse leader to identify opportunities for improvement to ensure quality, safety and staff satisfaction. Nursing Care Models Essay Assignment paper – NR447: RN Collaborative Healthcare.

ORDER A CUSTOM-WRITTEN PAPER NOW

Course Outcomes

Completion of this assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes.

CO#1: Apply leadership concepts, skills, and decision making in the provision of high quality nursing care, healthcare team management, and the oversight and accountability for care delivery in a variety of settings. (PO #2)

CO#2: Implement patient safety and quality improvement initiatives within the context of the interprofessional team through communication and relationship building. (PO #3)

CO#3: Participate in the development and implementation of imaginative and creative strategies to enable systems to change. (PO #7)

CO#6: Develop a personal awareness of complex organizational systems and integrate values and beliefs with organizational mission. (PO #7). Nursing Care Models Essay Assignment paper – NR447: RN Collaborative Healthcare.

CO#7: Apply leadership concepts in the development and initiation of effective plans for the microsystems and/or system-wide practice improvements that will improve the quality of healthcare delivery. (PO #2, and #3)

CO#8: Apply concepts of quality and safety using structure, process, and outcome measures to identify clinical questions as the beginning process of changing current practice. (PO#8)

Due Dates

This assignment is to be submitted to the Dropbox by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT, end of Week 5.

Points

This assignment is worth 200 points.

Directions

Read your text, Finkelman (2012), pp- 118- 127.

Observe staff in delivery of nursing care provided. Practice settings may vary depending on availability.

Identify the model of nursing care that you observed. Be specific about what you observed, who was doing what, when, how and what led you to identify the particular model. Nursing Care Models Essay Assignment paper – NR447: RN Collaborative Healthcare.

Write a 5-7 page paper that includes the following:

Review and summarize two scholarly resources (not including your text) related to the nursing care model you observed in the practice setting.

Review and summarize two scholarly resources (not including your text) related to a nursing care model that is
different
from the one you observed in the practice setting.

Discuss your observations about how the current nursing care model is being implemented. Be specific.

Recommend a
different
nursing care model that could be implemented to improve quality of nursing care, safety and staff satisfaction. Be specific.

Provide a summary/conclusion about this experience/assignment and what you learned about nursing care models.

Write your paper using APA format. Submit to the Dropbox.

Grading Criteria: Nursing Care Models Paper

Category

Points

%

Description

Identify Nursing Care Model in practice including specifics about who, what when, where, etc.

60

30%

Identifies Nursing Care Model for delivery of nursing care.  Provides specifics. Nursing Care Models Essay Assignment paper – NR447: RN Collaborative Healthcare.

Besides Finkelman, locate scholarly resources related to Nursing Care Models

40

20%

In addition to Finkelman, locates four scholarly resources related to Nursing Care Models. Summarizes all resources in body of paper.

Implementation and Recommendations

60

30%

Describe implementation of current Nursing Care Model and recommend a
different
model that could be utilized to improve quality of nursing care, safety and staff satisfaction.

Conclusion/ summary

20

10%

Summarize what you learned about this experience including new knowledge about nursing care models.

Clarity of writing

20

10%

Content is organized, logical, and with correct grammar, punctuation, spelling, and sentence structure are correct.  APA formatting is apparent and CCN template is utilized. References are properly cited within the paper; reference page includes all citations; proper title page and introduction are present and evidence of spell and grammar check is obvious. Nursing Care Models Essay Assignment paper – NR447: RN Collaborative Healthcare.

Total

200 points

100%

A quality paper will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.

 

 

Grading Rubric

Assignment Criteria

A (100%)

Exceptional

 

Outstanding or highest level of performance

B (88%)

Exceeds

 

Very good or high level of performance

C (80%)

Meets

 

Competent or satisfactory level of performance

NI (38%)

Needs Improvement

Poor or failing level of performance

F (0%)

Developing

 

Unsatisfactory level of performance

Identify Nursing Care Model in practice including specifics about who, what when, where, etc.

60 points

After an introduction paragraph, thoroughly identifies Nursing Care Model in practice including all the specifics about who, what when, where, etc.

60 points ☐

After an introduction paragraph, generally identifies Nursing Care Model in practice including most of the specifics about who, what when, where, etc.

53 points ☐

After an introduction paragraph, briefly identifies Nursing Care Model in practice including minimum specifics about who, what when, where, etc. Nursing Care Models Essay Assignment paper – NR447: RN Collaborative Healthcare

48 points ☐

After an introduction paragraph, briefly identifies Nursing Care Model in practice, but describes only one or two specifics.

23 points ☐

Does not provide an introduction paragraph. Fails to identify a Nursing Care Model. Does not include any specifics.

0 points ☐

Besides Finkelman, locate scholarly resources related to

40 points

Thoroughly
reviews and summarizes
two
scholarly resources (not including the course textbook) related to the nursing care model you observed in the practice setting. Also,
thoroughly
reviews and summarizes
two
scholarly resources (not including your text) related to a nursing care model that is
different
from the one you observed.

40 points ☐
s

Generally
reviews and summarizes
two
scholarly resources (not including the course textbook) related to the nursing care model you observed in the practice setting. Also,
generally
reviews and summarizes
two
scholarly resources (not including your text) related to a nursing care model that is
different
from the one you observed.

35 points ☐

Briefly
reviews only
one
resource (besides the course textbook) related to nursing care model observed in practice setting.

Also,
briefly
reviews only
one
resource (besides text) related to a nursing care model that is
different
from the one you observed. Nursing Care Models Essay Assignment paper – NR447: RN Collaborative Healthcare

32 points ☐

Reviews only one resource (besides the course textbook) related to the nursing care model observed in practice, and fails to review a resource (besides the course textbook) related to a nursing care model that is
different
from the one you observed.

15 points ☐

Fails to provide any resources related to the nursing care model that was observed and that was different.

0 points ☐

Implementation and Recommendations

60 points

Thoroughly describes implementation of current Nursing Care Model
and
recommends a
different
model that could be utilized to improve quality of nursing care, safety and staff satisfaction.

60 points ☐

Generally describes implementation of current Nursing Care Model
and
recommends a
different
model that could be utilized but omits quality or safety or staff satisfaction.

53 points ☐

Briefly describes implementation of current Nursing Care Model
and
recommends a
different
model that could be utilized but omits two of the following (quality/safety/staff satisfaction).

48 points ☐

Minimally describes implementation of current Nursing Care Model but does
NOT
recommend a
different
model that could be utilized. Various elements are missing related to improving quality of nursing care, safety and staff satisfaction.

23 points ☐

Does
NOT
describe a Nursing Care Model
or
a
different
model that could be utilized. Elements are missing related to improving quality of nursing care, safety and staff satisfaction. Nursing Care Models Essay Assignment paper – NR447: RN Collaborative Healthcare

0 points ☐

Conclusion and summary

20 points

Includes conclusion paragraph and thoroughly summarizes what you learned about this experience including new knowledge about nursing care models.

20 points ☐

Includes conclusion paragraph and clearly summarizes what you learned about this experience including new knowledge about nursing care models.

18 points ☐

Includes conclusion paragraph but briefly summarizes what you learned about this experience
or
includes new knowledge about nursing care models but not both.

16 points ☐

Conclusion/ summary is present but difficult to find in closing paragraphs of paper.

8 points ☐

Does not Include a conclusion paragraph

0 points ☐

Clarity of writing

20 points

Content is organized, logical, and grammar, punctuation, spelling, and sentence structure are correct. APA formatting is apparent, utilizing CCN template. References are properly cited within the paper. Reference page includes all citations; proper title page and introduction are present and evidence of spell and grammar check is obvious. Less than three errors are noted.

20 points ☐

Content is mostly organized, logical, and grammar, punctuation, spelling, and sentence structure are correct. APA formatting is apparent, utilizing CCN template. References are properly cited within the paper. Reference page includes all citations; proper title page and introduction are present and evidence of spell check and grammar check is obvious. Four to six errors are noted.

18 points ☐

Content is somewhat organized, logical and grammar, punctuation, spelling, and sentence structure are correct. Minor APA formatting errors exist. References are properly cited within the paper. Reference page includes all citations; proper title page and introduction are present and evidence of spell check and grammar check are
not
obvious. Seven to 10 errors are noted.

16 points ☐

Content is somewhat organized, but may lack logic. Several errors occur in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and sentence structure. Major APA formatting errors exist. Reference page does not match up with in-text citations, i.e., references may be missing for in-text citations, or references appear with no comparable in-text citation.

Eleven to 15 errors are noted.

8 points ☐

Content is disorganized and writing has numerous grammar, spelling, or syntax errors. APA formatting was not used. Spell check and grammar check are
not
obvious. More than 15 errors are noted. Nursing Care Models Essay Assignment paper – NR447: RN Collaborative Healthcare

0 points ☐

Total Points Possible= 200

Nursing Care Models Essay Assignment paper – NR447: RN Collaborative Healthcare

Nursing NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines

NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines and Rubric

Purpose

This assignment provides the opportunity for the student to complete a concept analysis of a concept found in a
nursing
theory using an identified process. The assignment fosters analytical thinking related to the selected concept as well as application within the profession. Nursing NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines.

Course Outcomes

Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to:

ORDER A CUSTOM-WRITTEN PAPER NOW

(CO#1) Analyze theories from nursing and relevant fields with respect to their components, relationships among the components, logic of the propositions, comprehensiveness, and utility to advanced nursing. (PO1)

(CO#3) Communicate the analysis of and proposed strategies for the use of a theory in nursing practice. (PO3, 7, 10)

(CO#4)

Demonstrate logical and creative thinking in the analysis and application of a theory to nursing practice. (PO4. 7)

 

Due Date
Sunday 11:59 PM MT at the end of Week 4

Total Points Possible
: 250 Points. Nursing NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines.

Requirements

Description of the Assignment

This assignment presents a modified method for conducting a concept analysis of
ONE
concept found in a
nursing
theory.  The source of the concept for this assignment must be a published
nursing
theory. The selected concept is identified and then the elements of the analysis process are applied in order to synthesize knowledge for application within the model and alternative cases.  Non-nursing theories may
NOT
be used. The paper concludes with a synthesis of the student’s new knowledge about the concept. The scholarly literature is incorporated throughout the analysis. Nursing NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines.

Only the elements identified in this assignment should be used for this concept analysis.

Criteria for Content

Introduction

The introduction substantively presents all following 4 (four) elements:

Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development,

Identifies the selected
nursing
concept,

Identifies the
nursing
theory from which the selected concept was obtained, and

Names the sections of the paper.

 

Definition/Explanation of the selected nursing concept

This section includes:

Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required), and

Information about the concept as discussed by the theorist from the selected nursing theory is substantively presented. Nursing NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines.

A substantive discussion of this section with support from nursing literature is required.

 

Literature review

This section requires:

A substantive discussion of
at least 6 (six)
scholarly nursing literature sources on the selected concept.

Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in an organized fashion. Nursing NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines.

Support from nursing literature is required.

Please Note:
Primary research articles about the selected nursing concept are the most useful resource for the literature review.

Defining attributes

For this section:

A minimum of THREE (3) attributes are required.

 

A substantive discussion of this section with support from nursing literature is required.

Explanation
:  An attribute identifies characteristics of a concept.  For this situation, the characteristics of the selected nursing concept are identified and discussed.

 

 

Antecedent and Consequence

This section requires the identification of:

1 antecedent
of the selected nursing concept, and

1 consequence
of the selected nursing concept.

 

A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.

Explanation:
  An antecedent is an identifiable occurrence that precedes an event.  In this situation, an antecedent precedes a selected nursing concept.

A consequence follows or is the result of an event.  In this situation a consequence follows or is the result of the selected nursing concept. Nursing NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines.

Empirical Referents

This section requires the identification of:

2 (two)
empirical referents of the selected nursing concept.

A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.

Explanation:
  An empirical referent is an objective ways to measure or determine the presence of the selected nursing concept.

 

Model Cases

1 model case
is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas:

Definition,

All identified attributes,

Antecedent,

Consequence, and

Empirical referent or Measurement

Information from selected nursing theory is applied to the created model case. Nursing NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines.

A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.

Explanation:
 A model case is an example of the hypothetical individual who demonstrates all of the attributes, antecedents, consequences, and referents noted previously in this assignment. Nursing NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines.

Alternative Cases

This section requires:

The identification of
2
(two) alternative cases correctly created and presented. The two required alternative cases are:

Borderline (absence of one or two of previously identified attributes of the selected nursing concept.

Contrary (demonstrates the complete opposite of selected nursing concept). Nursing NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines.

Applies information from selected nursing theory.

Explanation:
  Alternative cases represent the opposite of the model case.

For this assignment, two alternative cases are required.  These are:

Borderline case which is a created case where one or two of the previously identified attributes are missing.

Contrary case which is a created case that demonstrate the complete opposite of the selected nursing concept.

 

Conclusion

This section requires:

Summarization of key information regarding:

Selected nursing concept,

Selected nursing theory, and

Application of concept analysis findings to advanced nursing practice.

 

The concluding statements include self-reflection on the new knowledge gained from conducting a concept analysis.

Preparing the Assignment

Criteria for Format and Special Instructions

The paper (excluding the title page and reference page) should be at least 8, but no more than 10 pages. Points will be lost for not meeting these length requirements.

Title page, running head, body of paper, and reference page must follow APA guidelines as found in the 6
th
edition of the manual. This includes the use of headings for each section of the paper except for the introduction where no heading is used. Nursing NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines.

The source of the concept for this assignment must be a published nursing theory. Non-nursing theories may
NOT
be used. Nursing NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines.

A minimum of
6
(six) scholarly references must be used. Required textbooks for this course, and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information may
NOT
be used as scholarly references for this assignment.  A dictionary maybe used as a reference for the section titled “Definition/Explanation of the selected nursing concept”, but it is
NOT
counted as one of the 6 required scholarly nursing references.  For additional assistance regarding scholarly nursing references, please see “What is a scholarly source” located in the Course Resources tab.  Be aware that information from .com websites may be incorrect and should be avoided.

References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale is provided and the instructor has approved them. Nursing NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines

Ideas and information from scholarly, peer reviewed, nursing sources must be cited and referenced correctly.

Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal, scientific writing.

PLEASE note: Do not rely on .com sites to identify the nursing theory as they do not provide accurate information in all cases. Nursing NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines.
 

Possible Concepts: 
The following concepts are not required; students may select one of these concepts or find another concept.  Each selected concept must be associated with a nursing theory; the use of non-nursing theories is
NOT
allowed.  If you have any questions regarding your concept or the nursing theory, please consult with your faculty member for assistance.
Please note: the concepts of incivility and civility are not allowed for this assignment.

·         Behavioral system

·         Boundary lines

·         Caring

·         Empowerment

·         Homeostasis

·         Noise

·         Open system

·         Palliative care

·         Resources

·         Self-care

Nursing NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines

 

·         Adaptation

·         Comfort

·         Compassion

·         Engagement

·         Leadership

·         Meaningfulness

·         Modeling

·         Pain

·         Pattern

·         Transaction

 

 

Nursing NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines Directions and Assignment Criteria

Assignment Criteria

Points

%

Description

Introduction

10

4

The introduction substantively presents all following 4 (four) elements:

·         Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development,

·         Identifies the selected
nursing
concept,

·         Identifies the
nursing
theory from which the selected concept was obtained, and

·         Identifies the sections of the paper

 

References from nursing literature are required.

Definition/Explanation of Selected Concept

25

10

This section includes:

·         Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required), and

·         Information about the concept as discussed by the theorist from the selected nursing theory is substantively presented.

 

References from nursing literature are required.

Literature Review                                        Nursing NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines   

30

12

This section requires:

·         A substantive discussion of
at least 6 (six)
scholarly nursing literature sources on the selected concept.

·         Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in an organized fashion.

Defining Attributes

25

10

For this section:

·         A minimum of THREE (3) attributes are required.

References from nursing literature are required.

Antecedents & Consequences

25

10

This section requires the identification of:

·        
1 antecedent
of the selected nursing concept, and

·        
1 consequence
of the selected nursing concept.

References from nursing literature are required.

Empirical Referents

25

10

This section requires the identification of:

·        
2 (two)
empirical referents of the selected nursing concept.

 

References from nursing literature are required.

Model Case

30

12

This section requires:

1 model case
is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas: Nursing NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines.

·         Definition,

·         All identified attributes,

·         Antecedent,

·         Consequence, and

·         Empirical referent or Measurement

Information from selected nursing theory is applied to the created model case.

Alternative Cases (one borderline; one contrary)

30

12

This section requires:

·         The identification of
2
(two) alternative cases correctly created and presented.  The two required alternative cases are:

o   Borderline (absence of one or two of previously identified attributes of the selected nursing concept.

o   Contrary (demonstrates the complete opposite of selected nursing concept

 

Applies information from selected nursing theory.

Conclusion

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10

4

This section requires:

·         Summarization of key information regarding:

·         Selected nursing concept,

·         Selected nursing theory, and

·         Application of concept analysis findings to advanced nursing practice.

Paper Specifications

20

8

A nursing theory was used.

 

The source of the concept for this assignment was a published nursing theory.  Non-nursing theories may
NOT
be used.

Paper meets length requirements of 8 to 10 pages

 

Minimum of 6 scholarly nursing references

A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, may
NOT
be used as scholarly references for this assignment.

 

References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale is provided and the instructor has approved them.  Nursing NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines

APA Format (6
th
edition)

10

4

Title page, running head, body of paper, and reference page must follow APA guidelines as found in the 6
th
edition of the manual. This includes the use of headings for each section of the paper except for the introduction where no heading is used.

One deduction for each type of APA style error

Citations in Text

5

2

Ideas and information that come from readings must be cited and referenced correctly.

Writing Mechanics

5

2

Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal written work as found in the 6
th
edition of the APA manual.

Total

 250

100
%

A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.

 

 

 

 

          Nursing NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines Grading Rubric

Assignment Criteria

Exceptional

(100%)

Outstanding or highest level of performance. Nursing NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines

Exceeds

(88%)

Very good or high level of performance

Meets

(80%)

Competent or satisfactory level of performance

Needs Improvement

(38%)

Poor or failing level of performance

Developing

(0)

Unsatisfactory level of performance. Nursing NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines

Content

Possible Points = 230 Points

 

 

 

 

 

Introduction

 10 Points

9 Points

8 Points

4  Points

0 Points

Presentation of information was exceptional and included
all
of the following elements:

 

Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development.

 

Identifies the selected
nursing
concept.

 

Identifies the
nursing
theory from which the selected concept was obtained.

 

A nursing theory was used.

 

Identifies the sections of the paper.

 

References from nursing literature are required.

 

Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included
all
of the following elements:

 

Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development.

 

Identifies the selected
nursing
concept.

 

Identifies the
nursing
theory from which the selected concept was obtained.

 

A nursing theory was used.

 

 

Identifies the sections of the paper. Nursing NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines

 

References from nursing literature are required.

 

 

 

 

Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the
all
of the following elements:

 

Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development.

 

Identifies the selected
nursing
concept.

 

Identifies the
nursing
theory from which the selected concept was obtained.

 

A nursing theory was used. Nursing NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines

 

Identifies the sections of the paper.

 

Limited references from nursing literature were provided.

 

Presentation of

information in
one or two
of the following elements fails to meet expectations:

 

Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development.

 

Identifies the selected
nursing
concept.

 

Identifies the
nursing
theory from which the selected concept was obtained.

 

A nursing theory was used.

 

Identifies the sections of the paper.

 

Limited or no references from nursing literature were provided.

 

 

 

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in
three or more
of the following elements:

 

Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development.

 

Identifies the selected
nursing
concept.

 

Identifies the
nursing
theory from which the selected concept was obtained.

 

A nursing theory was used.

 

Identifies the sections of the paper.

 

 

Limited or no references from nursing literature were provided.

 

Definition/Explanation of Selected Concept

25  Points

22 Points

 20 Points

 10 Points

0 Points

Presentation of information was exceptional and included
all
of the following elements:

 

Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required).

 

Information about the concept as discussed by the theorist from the selected nursing theory.

 

References from nursing literature are required.

 

 

 

 

 

Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included
all
of the following elements:

 

Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required).

 

Information about the concept as discussed by the theorist from the selected nursing theory.

 

References from nursing literature are required.

 

Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the
all
of the following elements:

 

Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required), and

 

Information about the concept as discussed by the theorist from the selected nursing theory.

 

Limited references from nursing literature were provided.

Presentation of

information in
one
 of the following elements fails to meet expectations: Nursing NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines

 

Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required), and

 

Information about the concept as discussed by the theorist from the selected nursing theory.

 

Limited or no references from nursing literature were provided.

 

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in
two or more
of the following elements:

 

Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required), and

 

Information about the concept as discussed by the theorist from the selected nursing theory.

 

Limited or no references from nursing literature were provided.

 

 

 

Literature Review

30 Points

26 Points

24 Points

11 Points

0 Points

Presentation of information was exceptional and included
all
of the following elements:

 

A substantive discussion of
at least 6 (six)
nursing literature sources on the selected concept. Nursing NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines

 

Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in an organized fashion.

Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included
all
of the following elements:

 

A substantive discussion of
at least 6 (six)
nursing literature sources on the selected concept.

 

Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in an organized fashion.

Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the
all
of the following elements:

 

A substantive discussion of at
least 6 (six)
nursing literature sources on the selected concept.

 

Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in an organized fashion.

Presentation of

information in
one
of the following elements fails to meet expectations:

 

A substantive discussion of at least
6 (six)
nursing literature sources on the selected concept.

 

Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in an organized fashion.

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in the following elements:

 

A substantive discussion of at least
6 (six)
nursing literature sources on the selected concept.

 

Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in a disorganized fashion.

Defining Attributes

25  Points

22 Points

 20 Points

 10 Points

0 Points

 

Presentation of information was exceptional and included
all
of the following elements:

 

A minimum of 3 (three) attributes

 

References from nursing literature are required.

 

Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included
all
of the following elements:

 

A minimum of 3 (three) attributes are required.

 

References from nursing literature are required.

 

Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the
all
of the following elements:

 

A minimum of 3 (three) attributes are required.

 

Limited references from nursing literature were provided.

Presentation of

information from following elements fails to meet expectations:

 

One or two attributes of the selected nursing concepts were presented.

 

Limited or no references from nursing literature were provided.

 

 

 

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in the following elements:

 

No attributes of the selected nursing concept were presented.

 

Limited or no references from nursing literature were provided.

Antecedents & Consequences

25  Points

22 Points

 20 Points

 10 Points

0 Points

Presentation of information was exceptional and included
all
of the following elements:

 

1 antecedent
of the selected nursing concept.

 

1 consequence
of the selected nursing concept.

 

References from nursing literature are required.

 

Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included
all
of the following elements:

 

1 antecedent
of the selected nursing concept.

 

1 consequence
of the selected nursing concept.

 

References from nursing literature are required.

 

Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the
all
of the following elements:

 

1 antecedent
of the selected nursing concept.

 

1 consequence
of the selected nursing concept.

 

Limited references from nursing literature were provided.

Presentation of

information in
one
of the following elements fails to meet expectations:

 

1 antecedent
of the selected nursing concept.

 

1 consequence
of the selected nursing concept.

 

Limited or no references from nursing literature were provided.

 

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in
two or more
of the following elements:

 

1 antecedent
of the selected nursing concept. Nursing NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines

·

1 consequence
of selected nursing concept.

 

Limited or no references from nursing literature were provided.

 

Empirical Referents

25  Points

22 Points

 20 Points

 10 Points

0 Points

Presentation of information was exceptional and included
all
of the following elements:

 

2 (two)
empirical referents of the selected nursing concept.

 

References from nursing literature are required.

 

Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included
all
of the following elements:

 

2 (two)
empirical referents of the selected nursing concept.

 

References from nursing literature are required.

 

Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the
all
of the following elements:

 

2 (two)
empirical referents of the selected nursing concept. Nursing NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines

 

Limited references from nursing literature were provided.

Presentation of

information in
one
of the following elements fails to meet expectations:

 

2(two)
empirical referents of the selected nursing concept.

 

Limited or no references from nursing literature were provided.

 

 

 

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in
two
of the following elements:

 

2(two)
empirical referents of the selected nursing concept.

 

 

Limited or no references from nursing literature were provided.

 

Model Case

 

 

30 Points

26 Points

24 Points

11 Points

0 Points

Presentation of information was exceptional and included
all
of the following elements:

 

1 model case
was created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas:

·         Definition,

·         All identified attributes,

·         Antecedent,

·         Consequence, and

·         Empirical referent

                        

Information from selected nursing theory is applied to the created model case.

 

Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included
all
of the following elements:

 

1 model case
is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas:

·         Definition,

·         All identified attributes,

·         Antecedent,

·         Consequence, and

·         Empirical referent

                        

Information from selected nursing theory is applied to the created model case.

 

Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the
all
of the following elements:

 

1 model case
was created by the student and
1 or 2
of the following are missing:

 

·         Definition,

·         All identified attributes,

·         Antecedent,

·         Consequence, and

·         Empirical referent

 

Information from selected nursing theory is applied to the created model case.

 

Presentation of

information in the following elements fails to meet expectations:

 

1 model case
was created by the student and
3
of the following are missing:

·         Definition,

·         All identified attributes,

·         Antecedent,

·         Consequence, and

·         Empirical referent

 

Information from selected nursing theory is applied to the created model case.  Nursing NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines

 

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in the following elements:

 

 

1 model case
was created by the student and
4  or more
of the following are missing:

·         Definition,

·         All identified attributes,

·         Antecedent,

·         Consequence, and

·         Empirical referent

 

Information from selected nursing theory is applied to the created model case.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Alternative Cases (one borderline; one contrary)

30 Points

26 Points

24 Points

11 Points

0 Points

Presentation of information was exceptional and included
all
of the following elements:

 

The identification of
2
(two) alternative cases correctly created and presented.

 

·         Borderline (absence of one or two of previously identified attributes of the selected nursing concept.

 

·         Contrary (demonstrates the complete opposite of selected nursing concept)

 

Applied information from selected nursing theory.

Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included
all
of the following elements:

 

The identification of
2
(two) alternative cases correctly created and presented.

 

·         Borderline (absence of one or two of previously identified attributes of the selected nursing concept.

·         Contrary (demonstrates the complete opposite of selected nursing concept)

 

Applied information from selected nursing theory.

 

Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the
all
of the following elements:

 

The identification of only ONE alternative cases correctly created and presented.

 

·         Borderline (absence of one or two of previously identified attributes of the selected nursing concept.

·         Contrary (demonstrates the complete opposite of selected nursing concept)

 

Applied information from selected nursing theory

Presentation of information in the following elements fails to meet expectations:

 

The identification of only ONE alternative cases correctly created and presented.

 

·         Borderline (absence of one or two of previously identified attributes of the selected nursing concept.

·         Contrary (demonstrates the complete opposite of selected nursing concept)

 

Applied information from selected nursing theory

 

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in the following elements:

The identification of only ONE alternative cases correctly created and presented.

 

·         Borderline (absence of one or two of previously identified attributes of the selected nursing concept.

·         Contrary (demonstrates the complete opposite of selected nursing concept)

 

Applied information from selected nursing theory

Conclusion

 10 Points

9 Points

8 Points

4  Points

0 Points

Presentation of information was exceptional and included
all
of the following elements:

 

·         Summarizing information on selected nursing concept,

·         Summarizing information on selected nursing theory, and

·         Summarizing the application of concept analysis findings to advanced nursing practice.

 

Self-reflection on the new knowledge gained regarding concept analysis

 

Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included
all
of the following elements:

 

·         Summarizing information on selected nursing concept,

·         Summarizing information on selected nursing theory, and

·         Summarizing the application of concept analysis findings to advanced nursing practice.

 

Self-reflection on the new knowledge gained regarding concept analysis

 

Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the
all
of the following elements:

 

·         Summarizing information on selected nursing concept,

·         Summarizing information on selected nursing theory, and

·         Summarizing the application of concept analysis findings to advanced nursing practice.

 

Self-reflection on the new knowledge gained regarding concept analysis

 

Presentation of

information in
one or two
of the following elements fails to meet expectations:

 

·         Summarizing information on selected nursing concept,

·         Summarizing information on selected nursing theory, and

·         Summarizing the application of concept analysis findings to advanced nursing practice.

 

Self-reflection on the new knowledge gained regarding concept analysis

 

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in
two or more
of the following elements:

 

·         Summarizing information on selected nursing concept,

·         Summarizing information on selected nursing theory, and

·         Summarizing the application of concept analysis findings to advanced nursing practice. Nursing NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines

 

Self-reflection on the new knowledge gained regarding concept analysis

 

Paper Specifications

20  Points

18 Points

 16 Points

 8 Points

0 Points

This section included
all
of the following:

 

A nursing theory was used.

 

The source of the concept for this assignment was a published nursing theory.

Paper meet length requirements of 8 to 10 page.

 

Minimum of 6 scholarly nursing references

 

A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were
NOT
used as scholarly references.

 

References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them.

This section included
three
of the following:

 

A nursing theory was used.

 

The source of the concept for this assignment was a published nursing theory.

 

Paper meet length requirements of 8 to 10 pages

 

Minimum of 6 scholarly nursing references

A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were
NOT
used as scholarly references.

 

References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them.

This section included only
two
of the following:

 

A nursing theory was used.

 

The source of the concept for this assignment was a published nursing theory.

Paper meet length requirements of 8 to 10 pages

 

Minimum of 6 scholarly nursing references

A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were
NOT
used as scholarly references.

 

References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them.

This section included only
one
of the following:

 

A nursing theory was used.

 

The source of the concept for this assignment was a published nursing theory.

 

Paper meet length requirements of 8 to 10 pages

 

Minimum of 6 scholarly nursing references

A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were
NOT
used as scholarly references.

 

References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them.

This section included
none
of the following:

 

A nursing theory was used.

 

The source of the concept for this assignment was a published nursing theory.

 

Paper meet length requirements of 8 to 10 pages

 

Minimum of 6 scholarly nursing references

A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were
NOT
used as scholarly references.

 

References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them.

 

 

Content Subtotal

 

 

_____of  230 points

Format

Possible Points =  20 Points

 

 

 

 

 

APA Style

 10 Points

9 Points

8 Points

4  Points

0 Points

APA guidelines, as per the 6
th
edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the

·         title page,

·         running head,

·         body of paper (including citations and headings), and

·         reference page

One deduction for each type of APA format error

 

0 to 1
APA error was present

APA guidelines, as per the 6
th
edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the

·         title page,

·         running head,

·         body of paper (including citations and headings), and

·         reference page

 

One deduction for each type of APA format error

 

2 –  3
APA errors were present

APA guidelines, as per the 6
th
edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the

·         title page,

·         running head,

·         body of paper (including citations and headings), and

·         reference page

 

One deduction for each type of APA format error

 

4 – 5
APA were are present

APA guidelines, as per the 6
th
edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the

·         title page,

·         running head,

·         body of paper (including citations and headings), and

·         reference page

 

One deduction for each type of APA format error

 

6 – 7
APA were are  present

Nursing NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines. APA guidelines, as per the 6
th
edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the

·         title page,

·         running head,

·         body of paper (including citations and headings), and

·         reference page

 

One deduction for each type of APA format error

 

8 or greater
APA errors were present

Citations

5  Points

4  Points

3 Points

 2 Points

0 Points

There were 0-1 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information  that contributed to knowledge

 

Permission to use references older than 5 years was obtained from faculty.

There were 2-3  errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge

 

Permission to use references older than 5 years was
NOT
obtained from faculty.

There were 4-5 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge. Nursing NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines

 

 

There were 6-7 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge

There were 8 or greater errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge

Writing Quality

5  Points

4  Points

3 Points

 2 Points

0 Points

1–2
errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6
th
edition of the APA manual

3 – 4
errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6
th
edition of the APA manual

 

5 – 6
errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6
th
edition of the APA manual

 

7 – 8
errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6
th
edition of the APA manual

 

9 or greater
errors
or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6
th
edition of the APA manual

 

Format Subtotal

_____of   20 points

Total Points. Nursing NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines

_____of  250 points

NRS-433V Week 5 – Evidence-Based Practice Presentation – Surgical Site Infections

Introduction to Nursing Research – Characteristics of Nursing Research Utilization and

Evidence-Based Practice

Grand Canyon University

This is a CLC assignment.

Choose a nursing problem from your current practice setting, and identify a possible solution to that problem.

Conduct a search of the literature related to this problem.

Analyze and critically appraise evidence-based literature to support the solution to

the identified problem. A minimum of (5) articles must be identified. This may include guidelines from the National Guideline Clearinghouse, Joanna Briggs Institute, or a review from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Review.

Prepare a 10-minute (8-10 slides; no larger than 5 MB) PowerPoint presentation related

to the problem, evidence appraisal, and practice implications. NRS-433V Week 5 – Evidence-Based Practice Presentation – Surgical Site Infections

Include the following components into the presentation:

1. Present the nursing practice problem with the PICO question.

2. Discuss your appraisal of the literature that addresses the problem.

3. Present the proposed practice changes from an integration of the findings.

While APA format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. NRS-433V Week 5 – Evidence-Based Practice Presentation – Surgical Site Infections

NRS-433V Week 5 PICOT Question – Bariatric Surgery

NRS-433V Week 5 PICOT Question – Bariatric Surgery

Introduction to Nursing Research – Characteristics of Nursing Research Utilization and Evidence-Based Practice

Grand Canyon University

The PICOT statement will provide a framework for your capstone project (the project students must complete during their final course in the RN-BSN program of study).

Review the PICOT article “Evidence-Based Practice, Step by Step: Asking the Clinical

Question: A Key Step in Evidence-Based Practice” along with the “Chapter 18: Using Research in Evidence-Based Nursing Practice” PowerPoint resource.

http://library.gcu.edu:2048/loginurl=http://gateway.ovid.com.library.gcu.edu:2048/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00000446-201003000-00028&LSLINK=80&D=ovft

The first step of the EBP process is to develop a question from the practice problem you drafted in Topic 1. Start with the patient and identify the clinical problems or issues that arise from clinical care. Consider the research and writing you completed in Topics 1-4.

Following the PICOT format, write a PICOT statement in an area of interest to you, which is applicable to your proposed capstone project.

APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

NRS-433V Week 5 PICOT Question – Bariatric Surgery

Treating Childhood Abuse Discussion Essay

Discussion: Treating Childhood Abuse

In 2012, statistics in the United States indicated that state CPS agencies received 3.4 million referrals for child abuse and neglect. Of these, nearly 700,000 children were found to be victims of maltreatment: 18% were victims of physical abuse and 78% were victims of neglect (CDC, 2014). Child sexual abuse makes up roughly 10% of child maltreatment cases in the United States (CDC, 2014). The CDC considers sexual abuse at any age a form of violence. Child abuse of any kind can lead to an increased state of inflammatory markers in adulthood, as well as multiple physical illnesses and high-risk behavior such as alcoholism and drug abuse. If a PMHNP identifies child abuse, there may be a need to report the abuse to authorities. Once able to provide treatment, the PMHNP can be instrumental in reducing the long-term effects of child abuse. Treating Childhood Abuse Discussion Essay.

In this Discussion, you recommend strategies for assessing for abuse and analyze influences of media and social media on mental health. You also evaluate the need for mandatory reporting of abuse.

Learning Objectives

ORDER A CUSTOM-WRITTEN PAPER NOW

Students will:

Recommend strategies for assessing for abuse

Analyze influences of media and social media on mental health

Evaluate the need for mandatory reporting of abuse

Treating Childhood Abuse Discussion Essay

 
To Prepare
 
for this Discussion:

Read the Learning Resources concerning treating childhood abuse.

Read the Child Abuse Case Study in the Learning Resources.

By Day 3

Post:

What strategies would you employ to assess the patient for abuse? Explain why you selected these strategies.

How might exposure to the media and/or social media affect the patient?

What type of mandatory reporting (if any) is required in this case? Why?

Treating Childhood Abuse Discussion Essay

By Day 6

Respond
 to at least 
two
 of your colleagues by providing at least two ways that their strategies may be expanded or improved.

Treating Childhood Abuse Discussion Essay

When assessing a child for potential abuse, the number one strategy is building a therapeutic relationship and making the client feel as comfortable as possible. If the client does not trust the clinician, they may be reluctant to open up.  It is also important to talk about confidentiality.  If abuse is suspected, it is imperative to obtain a spontaneous account of the incident as soon as possible. Treating Childhood Abuse Discussion Essay.

According to Sadock, Sadock, and Ruiz (2014), the interview with the child takes precedence over the physical examination.  The interview assesses the developmental and psychosocial history of the child and notes any changes in client behavior, confounding variables, family history and attitude, and underlying motivation of the adults involved. It can also be useful to request collateral information from other sources close to the child.  The clinician may also choose to use interview protocols such as the Cognitive Interview or Step-Wise Interview to maximize the amount of accurate information provided by the child.

Influences of Media

In my experience, sexual abuse exposed in the media has had positive effects on patients.  Weatherred (2015) finds that one in 10 children will be sexually abused before their 18
th
 birthday.  Americans learn most about child sexual abuse through the media. Exposing these cases helps to bring awareness to the public and policymakers, which in turn, has the capacity to improve evidenced based prevention and intervention services for youth and their families. Treating Childhood Abuse Discussion Essay.

The media helps open up discussion about this major health issue, and people are influenced to act and create solutions.  A recent example of this would be the #MeToo movement which created a community where victims were empowered to tell their story and could find strength from one another.   The media has helped contribute to a zero tolerance attitude within our society (Burke, 2006).

Mandatory Reporting

            
According to the Child Welfare Information Gateway (2016), all 50
 
states in the nation have statutes that identify what persons are required to report child maltreatment.  In the state of North Carolina, all persons who have cause to suspect that any juvenile is abused, neglected, or dependent, or has died as the result of maltreatment, is mandated to make a report.  It would be absolutely necessary to report the child abuse case to either law enforcement or child protective services. Treating Childhood Abuse Discussion Essay.

References

Burke, T. (2006). Me too. Retrieved from https://metoomvmt.org

Child Welfare Information Gateway. (2016). 
Mandatory reporters of child abuse and neglect. 
Retrieved from https://www.childwelfare.gov/pubPDFs/manda.pdf#page=5&view=Summaries%20of%20State%20Laws . Treating Childhood Abuse Discussion Essay.

Sadock, B. J., Sadock, V. A., & Ruiz, P. (2014). Child Psychiatry. In C. Pataki & N. Sussman (Eds.), 
Kaplan & Sadock’s synopsis of psychiatry: Behavioral sciences/clinical psychiatry 
(11th ed., pp. 1216-1226). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.

Weatherred, J. L. (2015). Child sexual abuse and the media: A literature review. 
Journal Of Child Sexual Abuse
, 
24
(1), 16-34. doi:10.1080/10538712.2015.976302. Treating Childhood Abuse Discussion Essay

Gap in access to quality, equity, or efficiency of healthcare essay

Overview: The focus of this module was on quality care. For your final project, you will research a gap in access to quality, equity, or efficiency of healthcare, (including existing initiatives in place to address the gap and economic and regulatory factors that are currently in place to address the gap). To begin this project, you must first conduct some background research into the gap and the impacted population. Prompt: After reviewing the Final Project Guidelines and Rubric document, select a healthcare delivery process gap and population affected from the list below. This will be the base of your final project, the healthcare delivery systems research paper. • Option One: A gap in quality related to care coordination for individuals with chronic illnesses • Option Two: A gap in equity related to mental health access for veterans • O
ption Three: A gap in efficiency related to rising cost of pharmaceuticals for the aging population  I am Choosing Option Three . 
Gap in access to quality, equity, or efficiency of healthcare essay

HCM 340 Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric

Overview: The focus of this module was on quality care. For your final project, you will research a gap in access to quality, equity, or efficiency of healthcare,

(including existing initiatives in place to address the gap and economic and regulatory factors that are currently in place to address the gap). To begin this

project, you must first conduct some background research into the gap and the impacted population.

Prompt: After reviewing the Final Project Guidelines and Rubric document, select a healthcare delivery process gap and population affected from the list below.

This will be the base of your final project, the healthcare delivery systems research paper.

• Option One: A gap in quality related to care coordination for individuals with chronic illnesses

• Option Two: A gap in equity related to mental health access for veterans

• Option Three: A gap in efficiency related to rising cost of pharmaceuticals for the aging population

In your paper, you will explain why the chosen topic is a gap in healthcare and analyze the specific population impacted by the issue. Specifically, you should

address the following:

• Describe a specific gap in the delivery of healthcare. Include the specific population affected by the gap.

• Briefly describe the history of this gap in access to healthcare. Has this been an issue historically, or is it a modern issue?

• Explain the impact that the socioeconomic background of the population has on their access to healthcare.

• Describe how the healthcare delivered to the population is affected by the gap in access.

• Predict any potential implications if this gap in access is not addressed.

Rubric

Guidelines for Submission: Your paper must be submitted as a 2- to 3-page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font,

one-inch margins, and at least three sources cited in APA format.

Critical Elements Proficient (100%) Needs Improvement (75%) Not Evident (0%) Value

Introduction: Gap Describes a specific gap in the delivery

of healthcare, including the specific

population affected by the gap

Describes a specific gap in the delivery

of healthcare, including the specific

population affected by the gap, but the

description is cursory or contains

inaccuracies

Does not describe a specific gap in the

delivery of healthcare to a specific

population

18

Introduction: History Briefly describes the history of this gap

in access to healthcare

Describes the history of this gap in

access to healthcare, but description is

verbose or contains inaccuracies

Does not describe the history of this gap

in access to healthcare

18

Introduction: Socioeconomic

Background

Explains the impact socioeconomic

background has on a population’s access

to healthcare

Explains the impact socioeconomic

background has on a population’s access

to healthcare, but explanation is cursory

or illogical

Does not explain the socioeconomic

background has on a population’s access

to healthcare

18

Introduction: Affect Describes how the healthcare delivered

to the population is affected by the gap

in access

Describes how the healthcare delivered

to the population is affected by the gap

in access, but description cursory or

contains inaccuracies

Does not describe how the healthcare

delivered to the population is affected

by the gap in access

18

Introduction: Implications Predicts any potential implications if the

gap in access is not addressed

Predicts any potential implications if the

gap in access is not addressed, but

predictions are unrealistic or unrelated

Does not predict any potential

implications if the gap in access is not

addressed

18

Articulation of Response Submission has no major errors related

to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax,

or organization

Submission has major errors related to

citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or

organization that negatively impact

readability and articulation of main

ideas

Submission has critical errors related to

citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or

organization that prevent understanding

of ideas

10

Total 100%

Gap in access to quality, equity, or efficiency of healthcare essay

Implicit & explicit self-inventory personal biases essay

Requirements

Criteria for Content

Complete a self-inventory on personal biases you hold. The biases might be implicit or explicit.

In a one to two-page summary, address the following.

Identify your selected specialty track (education, executive
, family nurse practitioner
, healthcare policy, or nursing informatics). Implicit & explicit self-inventory personal biases essay.

Discuss how biases can impact outcomes in selected nursing practice settings.

Identify personal biases and attitudes toward people with various cultural, gender, sexual orientation, age, weight, and religions that are different than your own.

Select one bias that you have. Implicit & explicit self-inventory personal biases essay.

Develop one strategy to reduce this bias.

Preparing the paper

Submission Requirements

Application: Use Microsoft Word 2013™ to create the written assessment.

Length: The paper (excluding the title page and reference page) is at maximum two pages.

A minimum of 
two (2)
scholarly literature references must be used. Make sure to use references that are current, no older than 5 years. Implicit & explicit self-inventory personal biases essay.

Submission: Submit your files: Last name_First initial_Assessment 2_Addressing Bias

Best Practices in Preparing the Project

The following are best practices in preparing this project.

Review directions thoroughly.

Follow submission requirements.

Make sure all elements on the grading rubric are included.

Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal, scientific writing. Implicit & explicit self-inventory personal biases essay.

Title page, running head, body of paper, and reference page must follow APA guidelines as found in the 6th edition of the manual. This includes the use of headings for each section of the paper except for the introduction where no heading is used.

Ideas and information that come from scholarly literature must be cited and referenced correctly.

A minimum of 
two (2) 
scholarly literature references must be used.

Abide by CCN academic integrity policy. Implicit & explicit self-inventory personal biases essay.

Rubric

Week 3: Addressing Bias Guidelines with Scoring Rubric

Week 3: Addressing Bias Guidelines with Scoring Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction. Implicit & explicit self-inventory personal biases essay

12.0 pts

Presentation of information is comprehensive and concise and includes all of the following elements. • General statements on biases • General statements on how biases influence interactions and affect outcomes nursing practice and profession • Identification of sections of the paper • Support from scholarly literature

11.0 pts

Presentation of information is superficial and includes all of the following elements. • General statements on biases • General statements on how biases influence interactions and affect outcomes nursing practice and profession • Identification of sections of the paper • Support from scholarly literature

10.0 pts

Presentation of information is minimally demonstrated and includes all of the following elements. • General statements on biases • General statements on how biases influence interactions and affect outcomes nursing practice and profession • Identification of sections of the paper • Support from scholarly literature

5.0 pts

Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations or is missing the following. • General statements on biases • General statements on how biases influence interactions and affect outcomes nursing practice and profession • Identification of sections of the paper • Support from scholarly literature

0.0 pts

Presentation of information in two or more of the following elements fail to meet expectations or are missing the following. • General statements on biases • General statements on how biases influence interactions and affect outcomes nursing practice and profession • Identification of sections of the paper • Support from scholarly literature

12.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscussion of Bias (first person can be used)

38.0 pts

Presentation of information is comprehensive and concise and includes all of the following elements. • Identifies selected specialty track • Discusses how biases can influence and affect outcomes in selected specialty area of professional practice • Provides citations from scholarly nursing literature

33.0 pts

Presentation of information is superficial in places and includes all of the following elements. • Identifies selected specialty track • Discusses how biases can influence and affect outcomes in selected specialty area of professional practice • Provides citations from scholarly nursing literature

30.0 pts

Presentation of information is minimally demonstrated and includes all of the following elements. • Identifies selected specialty track • Discusses how biases can influence and affect outcomes in selected specialty area of professional practice • Provides citations from scholarly nursing literature

14.0 pts

Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations or is missing the following. • Identifies selected specialty track • Discusses how biases can influence and affect outcomes in selected specialty area of professional practice • Provides citations from scholarly nursing literature

0.0 pts

Presentation of information in two or more following elements fail to meet expectations or are missing the following. • Identifies selected specialty track • Discusses how biases can influence and affect outcomes in selected specialty area of professional practice • Provides citations from scholarly nursing literature

38.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentification of Personal Bias (first person can be used)

6.0 pts

Presentation of information is comprehensive and concise and includes all of the following elements. • Identifies one personal bias • Identifies if the bias is implicit or explicit in nature

4.0 pts

Presentation of information is minimally demonstrated and includes all of the following elements. • Identifies one personal bias • Identifies if the bias is implicit or explicit in nature

2.0 pts

Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations or is missing the following. • Identifies one personal bias • Identifies if the bias is implicit or explicit in nature

0.0 pts

Presentation of information in both following elements fail to meet expectations or are missing the following. • Personal bias is not identified. • Nature of bias is not identified.

6.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStrategy to Reduce Bias (first person can be used)

19.0 pts

Presentation of information is comprehensive and concise • Develops one strategy to reduce bias

15.0 pts

Presentation is minimally demonstrated • Develops one strategy to reduce bias

0.0 pts

Presentation of information is missing • Strategy to reduce bias is not developed.

19.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSelf-Reflection (first person can be used)

32.0 pts

Presentation of information is comprehensive and concise and includes all of the following elements. • Summary regarding what was learned from completing this assessment • Statements on how this assessment will change future professional practice

28.0 pts

Presentation of information is good but superficial in places and includes all of the following elements. • Summary regarding what was learned from completing this assessment • Statements on how this assessment will change future professional practice

26.0 pts

Presentation of information is minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements. • Summary regarding what was learned from completing this assessment • Statements on how this assessment will change future professional practice. Implicit & explicit self-inventory personal biases essay

12.0 pts

Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations or is missing the following. • Summary regarding what was learned from completing this assessment • Statements on how this assessment will change future professional practice

0.0 pts

Presentation of information in the following elements fail to meet expectations or are missing the following. • Summary regarding what was learned from completing this assessment • Statements on how this assessment will change future professional practice

32.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Format

12.0 pts

APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page; • running head; • body of paper (including citations and headings); and • reference page. One deduction for each type of APA format error. 0 to 1 APA error is present

11.0 pts

APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page; • running head; • body of paper (including citations and headings); and • reference page. One deduction for each type of APA format error. 2–3 APA errors are present

10.0 pts

APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page; • running head; • body of paper (including citations and headings); and • reference page. One deduction for each type of APA format error. 4–5 APA errors are present

5.0 pts

APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page; • running head; • body of paper (including citations and headings); and • reference page. One deduction for each type of APA format error. 6–7 APA errors are present

0.0 pts

APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page; • running head; • body of paper (including citations and headings); and • reference page. One deduction for each type of APA format error. 8 or greater APA errors are present

12.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Mechanics

6.0 pts

1–2 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual

5.0 pts

3–4 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual

4.0 pts

5–6 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual

2.0 pts

7–8 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual

0.0 pts

9 or greater errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual

6.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferences and Page Length Note: Students are to use at least two (2) scholarly references current within 5 years. The paper (excluding the title page and reference page) should be at least one but no more than two pages.

0.0 pts Implicit & explicit self-inventory personal biases essay

2 Point Deduction Does not use at least two (2) current scholarly references and/or exceeds required page length.

0.0 pts

No deductions full points

0.0 pts

Total Points: 125.0

Implicit & explicit self-inventory personal biases essay

Major healthcare organization purchase essay

For this Critical Thinking assignment, imagine that you are tasked with evaluating a major purchase by your healthcare organization.

You have been asked to share the process steps of your purchase evaluation with the board of directors.

For this project, the actual product you are purchasing is secondary to the steps used to evaluate the capability of your organization to afford such a purchase.

However, to assist you with the constructs of this paper, you may select a product to focus on.
A recommended product may be a new MRI-machine
.

Be sure to highlight the time value of money as one of your considerations.

Major healthcare organization purchase essay

structural requirements:

4 pages.

Provide support for your statements with in-text citations from a minimum of 6 scholarly articles (within last 5 years).

Follow APA format.

Has introduction and conclusion.

Major healthcare organization purchase essay