Author: admin

  • Tommy Acker ihuman case study: Pediatric Fillable Soap Note Template

    Tommy Acker ihuman case study: Pediatric Fillable Soap Note Template

    You will complete a Comprehensive SOAP note on the approved Pediatric SOAP Note template based on the findings of the iHuman case – then major research and discussion of the disease process are presented.

    This case study should be a summative evaluation supported by a minimum of 5 evidence-based articles.

    Evaluation of the case study should be no more than 3-4 substantive paragraphs. A minimum of five evidence-based sources (in addition to your text) should be used for your case study.

    Course texts will not count as a scholarly source; if using data from websites you must go back to the literature source for the information-no secondary sources are allowed, ie, Medscape, UptoDate, etc. Tommy Acker ihuman case study: Pediatric Fillable Soap Note Template.

    This week, complete the iHuman case titled ”Tommy Acker V3”.

    ORDER A CUSTOM-WRITTEN PAPER NOW

    STUDENT NAME:

    DATE OF ASSIGNMENT:

    Patient Initials: Tommy Acker

    Date of Encounter:

     

    Sex: Male

    Age/DOB/Place of Birth: 26 months old

    2/5/2017

    SUBJECTIVE

    Tommy Acker ihuman case study: Pediatric Fillable Soap Note Template

    Historian: Mother

    Present Concerns/CC: “Stomach ache” (abdominal pain)

    Child Profile: Listless and ill appearing 26-month-old, male with a history of Downs’s syndrome and …. The mother states … as other children. She states that he is clumsy. He is always tripping, falling, or bumping into things as if he does not see that it is there. None of his … in him requiring medical attention. She states that he is normally … and does not require much else. He does not go to day care and lives at home with his two siblings and mother. His mother works and their neighbors or mother’s boyfriend babysit the children. Tommy Acker ihuman case study: Pediatric Fillable Soap Note Template.

    HPI:

    Onset: xx days ago

    Location/Radiation: xxx pain

    Duration: xxx over 2 days

    Character: xxx

    Aggravating factors: xxx

    Relieving Factors: none

    Timing: constant

    Severity: severe

    Tommy, a 26-month-old male with Down syndrome, was brought into the ED by his mother who reports he has been “complaining” of… days, had emesis x 1, is lethargic, sweati…is grossly distended with significant epigastric bruising, in a distribution that is atypical for a fall. It is firm to Tommy Acker ihuman case study: Pediatric Fillable Soap Note Template… tenderness. A reducible 2.0-cm umbilical hernia is present.

     

    Medications: None currently.

    PMH: Normal pregnancy and no complications noted at birth.

     

    Allergies: None

    Medication Intolerances:  None

    Chronic Illnesses/Major traumas: Atrioventricular septal defect, tra….

    BUY A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

    … thus, meeting more than two criteria for SIRS.

    3.       Child Abuse: Act of Commission (T74.12XA): According to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), physical, … and neglect (CDC, 2019). Neglect is defined as the failure to meet a child’s basic physical and emotional needs, including food, shelter, clothing, education, and access to medical care (CDC, 2019). Physical abuse is intentionally using physical force that may result in injury, such as, hitting, kicking, burning, or shaking of a child (CDC, 2019). Emotional abuse refers to the behaviors that harm a child’s self-worth or emotional well-being, such as shaming, rejection, or withholding love or affection (CDC, 2019). Abuse can come from …factors. In the situation with T.A., the mother was neglecting her children to be able to provide basic needs for them, while depriving them of education and exposing them to physical abuse from her boyfriend. Tommy’s injuries also do not match up to the stories his mother is reporting, and she seemed to take some time to bring him in to be evaluated and became defensive when possible questions that may point toward abuse were asked. Tommy Acker ihuman case study: Pediatric Fillable Soap Note Template.

    4.       Volvulus (K56.2): Volvulus can vary in presentation from vague, recurrent gastrointestinal discomfort to sudden onset of an acute abdomen with associated shock symptoms (Saxena, 2017). It may present in any age group and is not associated with traumatic injury. More often it occurs as a result of a congenital malrotation of the midgut (Saxena, 2017).

    PLAN including education

    Initial resuscitation and stabilization protocol:

    1.       Assess airway, circulation and breathing. Provide oxygen for hypoxia.

    2.       Place on …, continuous pulse oximetry, and monitor vital signs.

    3.       Place two …. as they are needed.

    4.       Complete Primary (airway, breathing, circulation, disability, and exposure) and secondary (head-toe exam) surveys (Kaplan, 2018). Tommy Acker ihuman case study: Pediatric Fillable Soap Note Template.

    T.A. is a child that is critically-ill. He will require further testing such as a … with contrast and an emergent surgical consult. He will also be admitted to the intensive care unit for further management. It is important to contact child protective services, police, and social-work personnel as needed.

     

     

    NSG 6435 Week 7 W7 Assignment 1

    Assignment 1: Comprehensive Case Study

    General Guidelines for Comprehensive Case Study – Week 7 Assignment 1

    Your case study should not be just a SOAP note of a patient encounter—it should be a comprehensive evaluation of an iHuman patient case.

    You will complete a Comprehensive SOAP note on the approved Pediatric SOAP Note template based on the findings of the iHuman case – then major research and discussion of the disease process are presented.

    This case study should be a summative evaluation supported by a minimum of 5 evidence-based articles.

    Evaluation of the case study should be no more than 3-4 substantive paragraphs.A minimum of five evidence-based sources (in addition to your text) should be used for your case study.

    Course texts will not count as a scholarly source; if using data from websites you must go back to the literature source for the information-no secondary sources are allowed, ie, Medscape, UptoDate, etc.

    This week, complete the iHuman case titled “Tommy Acker, Child Abuse”.Click here for information on how to access and navigate Tommy Acker ihuman case study: Pediatric Fillable Soap Note Template.

    Name your SOAP note document SU_NSG6435_W7_A1_lastname_firstinitial.doc

    i-Human

    i-Human is an interactive cloud based system that provides comprehensive learning that

    integrates clinical experience.The i-Human system helps students develop patient assessment

    and diagnostic reasoning skills at various levels of education.Students will receive online

    guidance, feedback, and coaching during the learning process.

    Student Login Instructions for Tommy Acker ihuman case study: Pediatric Fillable Soap Note Template

    Logging in to i-Human:

    Log on at:

    http://toolmanagement.next.ecollege.com/tools/thirdparty/blti.ed?launch=LS:iHuman:Patients

    Next Steps:

    1) If you were unable to attend a Student Orientation Webinar, please watch this introduction

    video: https://vimeo.com/185046053/228aea3fc9

    2) Additional tutorial videos can be found on the i-Human home screen under the title “Player

    Screencast Tutorials”

    3) After attending the webinar or viewing the tutorial you are ready for your first practice

    case.

    4) The i-Human Student Support Center (link on the home screen under the videos) is a

    resource for our most frequently asked questions.The Student Manual is also located here.

    5) If you are having any issues that are not answered through the webinars, videos or support

    center, you can email: support@i-human.com Tommy Acker ihuman case study: Pediatric Fillable Soap Note Template.

     

    PEDIATRIC FILLABLE SOAP NOTE TEMPLATE

    STUDENT NAME:

    Patient Initials:

     

    Sex:

     

    SUBJECTIVE

    Historian:

    Present Concerns/CC
    :

    DATE OF ASSIGNMENT:

    Date of Encounter:

     

    Age/DOB/Place of Birth:

     

    Reason given by the patient for seeking medical care “in quotes”

    Child Profile
    :  (
    Sexual History (If appropriate); ADLs (age appropriate); Safety Practices; Changes in daycare/school/after-school care; Tommy Acker ihuman case study: Pediatric Fillable Soap Note Template.

    Sports/physical activity; Developmental Hx)

     

    HPI:
    (must include all components – OLD CARTS)

     

    Medications
    :
    (List with reason for meds)

     

    PMH:

    Allergies:

     

    Medication Intolerances:

     

    Chronic Il nesses/Major traumas:

     

    Hospitalizations/Surgeries:

     

    Immunizations: Tommy Acker ihuman case study: Pediatric Fillable Soap Note Template.

     

    1 |
    P E D I A T R I C   S O A P   N O T E

     

    PEDIATRIC FILLABLE SOAP NOTE TEMPLATE

     

    Family History
     
    (please identify al  immediate family)

     

     

    Social History
    (Education level, occupational history, current living situation/partner/marital status, substance use/abuse, ETOH, tobacco, Tommy Acker ihuman case study: Pediatric Fillable Soap Note Template.

    and marijuana.  Safety status)

     

    Review of Systems (ROS)

     

    General

     

    Skin

     

    Eyes

     

    Ears

     

    Nose/Mouth/Throat

     

    Breast

     

    Heme/Lymph/Endo

     

    2 |
    P E D I A T R I C   S O A P   N O T E

    Cardiovascular

     

    Respiratory

     

    Gastrointestinal

     

    Genitourinary/Gynecological

     

    Musculoskeletal

     

    Neurological

     

    Psychiatric

    PEDIATRIC FILLABLE SOAP NOTE TEMPLATE

    OBJECTIVE  (plot height/weight/head circumference along with noting percentiles)

    Attach growth chart

     

    Weight

     

    Height

    Temp

     

    Pulse

    BP

     

    Resp

     

     

    OBJECTIVE (Physical Examination)

     

    General Appearance and parent
    –
    child interaction

     

    Skin

     

    HEENT

     

    Cardiovascular

     

    Respiratory

     

    Gastrointestinal

     

    Breast

     

    Genitourinary

     

    Musculoskeletal

     

    3 |
    P E D I A T R I C   S O A P   N O T E

     

    PEDIATRIC FILLABLE SOAP NOTE TEMPLATE

     

    Neurological

     

    Psychiatric

     

    In-house Lab Tests – document tests (results or pending)

     

    Pediatric/Adolescent Assessment Tools (Ages & Stages, etc) with
    results and rationale

    For adolescents (HEADSSSVG Assessment)

     

    ASSESSMENT (Diagnosis – 3 Differentials and Primary)

         Include at least three differential diagnoses with ICD-10 codes.  (Includes Primary dx and 2

    differentials) Tommy Acker ihuman case study: Pediatric Fillable Soap Note Template.

        
    Document Evidence based Rationale for ROS and each differential with pertinent

    positives and negatives

         Primary diagnosis

         Is #1 on list of differentials

         Evidence for primary diagnosis should be supported in the Subjective and Objective

    exams.

    1)

     

    2)

     

    3)

     

    4 |
    P E D I A T R I C   S O A P   N O T E

     

    PEDIATRIC FILLABLE SOAP NOTE TEMPLATE

    PLAN including education

    PLAN including education

         Plan:  Treatment plan should be for the Primary Diagnosis and based on EB literature.

         Include
    EB rationale
    for all aspects of your treatment plan:

         Vaccines administered this visit

         Vaccine administration forms given

         Medication-amounts and mg/kg for medications

         Laboratory tests ordered

         Diagnostic tests ordered

         Patient education including preventive care and anticipatory guidance

         Non-medication treatments

    Fol ow-up appointment with detailed plan of  f/u

     

    *ALL references must be
    Evidence Based (EB)

     

    5 |
    P E D I A T R I C   S O A P   N O T E

    Pediatric_Fillable_SOAP_Note_Template–

    growth_chart

    Tommy Acker ihuman case study: Pediatric Fillable Soap Note Template

  • Practicum Project Methodology and Evaluation Discussion Essay

    Practicum Project Methodology and Evaluation Discussion Essay

    Consider the following scenario:

    With a clear conception of her Practicum Project goal and objectives, Sandra was optimistic that she was on the right track. Then she started to consider the methodology for her project and realized how much she still needed to figure out. She began to think about the theories and concepts she had examined in her program of study and how they might inform her methodology. The biggest challenge, she discovered, was in mapping the strategies that would help her achieve each objective. Practicum Project Methodology and Evaluation Discussion Essay. How would she decide what would be most effective? What barriers were likely to arise? She also realized that she needed to think about evaluation early in order to establish appropriate criteria and make sure she could assess the evidence related to the process, impact, and outcomes of her project. She wondered how she might use formative evaluation to develop and improve the project, as well as how she could use summative evaluation following the implementation of the project to determine if it had been successful.

    ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

    Consider the models, theories, and concepts you have examined in your program of study as they relate to your project. Which of these can be applied to the development of methodology to help you achieve the project objectives? Which ones can be used to help you establish criteria and methods of evaluation for your project?

    In this Discussion, you examine and propose the methodology for your Practicum Project, as well as evaluation methods. The insights you gain through this Discussion should be integrated into your Practicum Project Plan, which is due in Week 5. Practicum Project Methodology and Evaluation Discussion Essay.

    To prepare:

    Reflect on the Practicum Project goal and objectives you developed in Week 3.

    Refer to the Practicum Project Plan (PPP) Overview document as needed for information related to the assignment.

    Consider the models, theories, and concepts you have examined in your program of study as they relate to your project. How can this information be applied to the development of the methodology and evaluation for your project?

    Review the information on methodology in the Learning Resources, and conduct additional research to facilitate your analysis for your project. Evaluate the who, what, how, where, and when associated with each objective: Who will make what change, by how much, where, and by when? Consider the methods you could use to meet each objective. Practicum Project Methodology and Evaluation Discussion Essay. Devise your methodology in as much detail as possible to identify how you could meet each objective. For example, identify which professional organizations or regulatory bodies you would consult (by viewing their websites or contacting them directly) to gather evidence.

    Review the information on formative and summative evaluation in this week’s Learning Resources, and conduct additional research to facilitate your analysis for your project. How could you evaluate achievement of your Practicum Project objectives using formative and/or summative evaluation? Begin to develop an evaluation plan for your Practicum Project.

    Post a brief summary of your Practicum Project focus, including the goal and objectives of your Practicum Project (to serve as a reminder for your colleagues). Explain your selected methodology, and justify your selection. Include a detailed explanation of how you could meet each objective using this methodology. Practicum Project Methodology and Evaluation Discussion Essay. Also explain your evaluation plan, noting at which points during your Practicum Project formative and/or summative evaluation will occur.

    Respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days, using one or more of the following approaches:

    Comment on your colleague’s methodology, offering suggestions for improvement as appropriate.

    Suggest an alternative evaluation method for your colleague’s project.

    Required Readings

    Reminder: Review resources from previous courses as necessary.

    Black, P. (2010). Formative assessment. In P. Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGaw (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (3rd ed., pp. 359–364). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.

    Note: Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.

     

    This article outlines the history of formative assessment and its application and use as an evaluation tool. Practicum Project Methodology and Evaluation Discussion Essay.

    Duers, L. E., & Brown, N. (2009). An exploration of student nurses’ experiences of formative assessment. Nurse Education Today, 29(6), 654–659.

    Note: Retrieved from the Walden Library databases Practicum Project Methodology and Evaluation Discussion Essay.

    This article compares formative and summative assessment and presents examples of the application of formative assessment in nursing education.

    Gantt, L. T. (2013). The effect of preparation on anxiety and performance in summative simulations. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 9(1), e25–e33.

    Note: Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.

    This article provides an example of how formative and summative evaluation is used in a nursing simulation lab. The article discusses strategies for improving nurses’ performance on summative evaluations and explores the use of formative evaluation as a strategy for improving performance on summative evaluations.

    Pellegrino, J. W. (2010). Technology and formative assessment. In P. Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGaw (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (3rd ed., pp. 42–47). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.

    Note: Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.

     

    The author discusses the importance of formative assessment and examines how technology can be used to support the assessment process.

    oject Methodology and Evaluation

    Consider the following scenario:

    With a clear conception of her Practicum Project goal and objectives, Sandra was optimistic that she was on the right track. Then she started to consider the methodology for her project and realized how much she still needed to figure out. Practicum Project Methodology and Evaluation Discussion Essay. She began to think about the theories and concepts she had examined in her program of study and how they might inform her methodology. The biggest challenge, she discovered, was in mapping the strategies that would help her achieve each objective. How would she decide what would be most effective? What barriers were likely to arise? She also realized that she needed to think about evaluation early in order to establish appropriate criteria and make sure she could assess the evidence related to the process, impact, and outcomes of her project. She wondered how she might use formative evaluation to develop and improve the project, as well as how she could use summative evaluation following the implementation of the project to determine if it had been successful.

    Consider the models, theories, and concepts you have examined in your program of study as they relate to your project. Which of these can be applied to the development of methodology to help you achieve the project objectives? Which ones can be used to help you establish criteria and methods of evaluation for your project?

    In this Discussion, you examine and propose the methodology for your Practicum Project, as well as evaluation methods. The insights you gain through this Discussion should be integrated into your Practicum Project Plan, which is due in Week 5. Practicum Project Methodology and Evaluation Discussion Essay.

    To prepare:

    Reflect on the Practicum Project goal and objectives you developed in Week 3.

    Refer to the Practicum Project Plan (PPP) Overview document as needed for information related to the assignment.

    Consider the models, theories, and concepts you have examined in your program of study as they relate to your project. How can this information be applied to the development of the methodology and evaluation for your project?

    Review the information on methodology in the Learning Resources, and conduct additional research to facilitate your analysis for your project. Evaluate the who, what, how, where, and when associated with each objective: Who will make what change, by how much, where, and by when? Consider the methods you could use to meet each objective. Devise your methodology in as much detail as possible to identify how you could meet each objective. For example, identify which professional organizations or regulatory bodies you would consult (by viewing their websites or contacting them directly) to gather evidence. Practicum Project Methodology and Evaluation Discussion Essay.

    Review the information on formative and summative evaluation in this week’s Learning Resources, and conduct additional research to facilitate your analysis for your project. How could you evaluate achievement of your Practicum Project objectives using formative and/or summative evaluation? Begin to develop an evaluation plan for your Practicum Project.

    Post a brief summary of your Practicum Project focus, including the goal and objectives of your Practicum Project (to serve as a reminder for your colleagues). Explain your selected methodology, and justify your selection. Include a detailed explanation of how you could meet each objective using this methodology. Also explain your evaluation plan, noting at which points during your Practicum Project formative and/or summative evaluation will occur.

    Respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days, using one or more of the following approaches:

    Comment on your colleague’s methodology, offering suggestions for improvement as appropriate.

    Suggest an alternative evaluation method for your colleague’s project.

    Required Readings

    Reminder: Review resources from previous courses as necessary.

    Black, P. (2010). Formative assessment. In P. Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGaw (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (3rd ed., pp. 359–364). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.

    Note: Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.

     

    This article outlines the history of formative assessment and its application and use as an evaluation tool.

    Duers, L. E., & Brown, N. (2009). An exploration of student nurses’ experiences of formative assessment. Nurse Education Today, 29(6), 654–659.

    Note: Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.

     

    This article compares formative and summative assessment and presents examples of the application of formative assessment in nursing education.

    Gantt, L. T. (2013). The effect of preparation on anxiety and performance in summative simulations. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 9(1), e25–e33.

    Note: Retrieved from the Walden Library databases Practicum Project Methodology and Evaluation discussion Essay.

    This article provides an example of how formative and summative evaluation is used in a nursing simulation lab. The article discusses strategies for improving nurses’ performance on summative evaluations and explores the use of formative evaluation as a strategy for improving performance on summative evaluations.

    Pellegrino, J. W. (2010). Technology and formative assessment. In P. Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGaw (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (3rd ed., pp. 42–47). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.

    Note: Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.

     

    The author discusses the importance of formative assessment and examines how technology can be used to support the assessment process. Practicum Project Methodology and Evaluation Discussion Essay.

  • Practicum Project Plan (PPP) Overview

    NURS 6600: Capstone Synthesis Practicum – Practicum Project Plan (PPP) Overview

    The Practicum Project Plan is a scholarly proposal for your project.

    Project Planning Guidelines

    As you proceed with your Practicum Project planning, keep in mind that approximately half of your practicum hours may be spent on your Practicum Project. The development of the PPP does not count toward your practicum hours, and you may not begin to earn practicum hours for your project until your proposal is approved.

    ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

    Your actual Practicum Project must be completed on or before Day 5 of Week 11. Be sure to develop your plan accordingly. For instance, if you include any sort of data gathering tool as a part of your project, you must receive IRB approval. Projects that require IRB approval, and this type of project therefore will be difficult to complete on time. If you desire to extend your project timeline, you may discuss this option with your Instructor. However, if you desire to complete your project on or before Day 5 of Week 11, your project should not include surveys, focus groups, collection of data, or any activities that require IRB approval. Practicum Project Plan (PPP) Overview.

    In addition, remember that your Practicum Project goal and objectives are distinct from the practicum professional development objectives you developed in Week 1.

    Practicum Project Plan (PPP)

    This is the 4- to 6-page scholarly paper, referred to as your Practicum Project Plan (PPP), in which you will formulate findings, conclusions, and recommendations in relation to the problem or issue you are examining. Your paper will include the following:

    Title:

    The title should include the name of your project and should follow the Uniform-Guidelines format.

    Introduction:

    The introduction includes the purpose of the paper, the goal of the project, and the name of the project. It also outlines the structure of the paper.

    Goal statement:

    A goal statement identifies what you expect to accomplish, the focus area, and the population. It introduces the project and conveys, in broad terms, how you plan to solve a particular problem or issue. Practicum Project Plan (PPP) Overview.

    Project objectives:

    Project objectives delineate your strategy for reaching the goal and the steps you will follow to complete the project. You must include two or three measurable objectives that use Application-level or higher verbs from Bloom’s Taxonomy.

    Evidence-based review of the literature for project justification:

    This review provides evidence-based support for your identified problem, project methods, and evaluation (presented in Week 4). The literature should be directed toward justifying the project, not focus on potential solutions. You must include a review of your specialization’s professional-practice standards and guidelines related to your project and a minimum of five (5) scholarly references for this section of the paper. Practicum Project Plan (PPP) Overview.

    Methodology:

    This section addresses in detail how you will accomplish the project objectives. Include, as relevant, the who, when, where, and how of each objective.

    Resources:

    Identify and justify the human, physical, and/or technical resources you will need to complete this project. Note that for this assignment, you do not have to address the financial aspects of your plan.

    Formative evaluation:

    Describe how and when you will conduct formative evaluation of your project. Explain how you will use the evaluation results and how you will determine if the project is proceeding as planned.

    Summative evaluation:

    Describe how and when you will conduct summative evaluation of your project. Explain how you will use the evaluation results. Practicum Project Plan (PPP) Overview.

    Timeline: Create a graphic timeline representing significant stages of your project. Provide a narrative to help your Instructor understand the timeline. Include the timeline in an Appendix to your Practicum Project Plan.

    Note: You must use APA-style headings, but you are not required to title the headings as listed above.

    Question Description

    Consider the models, theories, and concepts you have examined in your program of study as they relate to your project. Which of these can be applied to the development of methodology to help you achieve the project objectives? Practicum Project Plan (PPP) Overview. Which ones can be used to help you establish criteria and methods of evaluation for your project?

    In this Discussion, you examine and propose the methodology for your Practicum Project, as well as evaluation methods. The insights you gain through this Discussion should be integrated into your Practicum Project Plan, which is due in Week 5.

    To prepare:

    Reflect on the Practicum Project goal and objectives you developed in Week 3.

    Refer to the Practicum Project Plan (PPP) Overview document as needed for information related to the Practicum Project Plan (PPP) Overview assignment.

    Consider the models, theories, and concepts you have examined in your program of study as they relate to your project. How can this information be applied to the development of the methodology and evaluation for your project?

    Review the information on methodology in the Learning Resources, and conduct additional research to facilitate your analysis for your project. Evaluate the who, what, how, where, and when associated with each objective: Who will make what change, by how much, where, and by when? Consider the methods you could use to meet each objective. Devise your methodology in as much detail as possible to identify how you could meet each objective. For example, identify which professional organizations or regulatory bodies you would consult (by viewing their websites or contacting them directly) to gather evidence.

    Review the information on formative and summative evaluation in this week’s Learning Resources, and conduct additional research to facilitate your analysis for your project. How could you evaluate achievement of your Practicum Project objectives using formative and/or summative evaluation? Begin to develop an evaluation plan for your Practicum Project.

    By Day 2

    Post a brief summary of your Practicum Project focus, including the goal and objectives of your Practicum Project (to serve as a reminder for your colleagues). Explain your selected methodology, and justify your selection. Include a detailed explanation of how you could meet each objective using this methodology. Also explain your evaluation plan, noting at which points during your Practicum Project formative and/or summative evaluation will occur Practicum Project Plan (PPP) Overview.

  • NSG 6435 : Family Health III Pediatrics

    NSG 6435 : Family Health III Pediatrics

    Week 1

    discussion

    Pediatric Health-Care Services

    This discussion assignment provides a forum for discussing relevant topics for this week based on the course competencies covered.

    For this assignment, make sure you post your initial response to the Discussion Area by the due date assigned. NSG 6435 : Family Health III Pediatrics

    To support your work, use your course textbook readings and the South University Online Library. As in all assignments, cite your sources in your work and provide references for the citations in APA format.

    ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

    Start reviewing and responding to the postings of your

    classmates as early in the week as possible. Respond to at least two of your

    classmates’ initial postings. Participate in the discussion by asking a

    question, providing a statement of clarification, providing a point of view

    with a rationale, challenging an aspect of the discussion, or indicating a

    relationship between two or more lines of reasoning in the discussion. Cite

    sources in your responses to other classmates. Complete your participation for

    this assignment by the end of the week.

    Using your course textbook readings and the South University

    Online Library, perform research on the following:

    Sources of pediatric primary care in the United States

    Current status of pediatric health-care services in the

    United States NSG 6435 : Family Health III Pediatrics

    Barriers to health care for children in the United States

    After completing your research, answer the following

    questions:

    What are the

    sources of pediatric primary care in the United States? Are these sources

    sufficient for providing health-care services to the pediatric population? Why

    or why not?

    Are there certain

    pediatric populations that lack access to health-care services? Why? NSG 6435 : Family Health III Pediatrics.

    What are the

    barriers to children in accessing health-care services in the United States?

    Why do these barriers exist?

    Week 2

    discussion

    iHuman Case Study – Developmental Assessment and Biological

    Functioning

    This discussion assignment provides a forum for discussing

    relevant topics for this week based on the course competencies covered. For

    this assignment, make sure you post your initial response to the Discussion

    Area by the due date assigned.

    To support your work, use your course textbook readings and

    the South University Online Library. As in all assignments, cite your sources

    in your work and provide references for the citations in APA format.

    Start reviewing and responding to the postings of your classmates

    as early in the week as possible. Respond to at least two of your classmates’

    initial postings. Participate in the discussion by asking a question, providing

    a statement of clarification, providing a point of view with a rationale,

    challenging an aspect of the discussion, or indicating a relationship between

    two or more lines of reasoning in the discussion. Cite sources in your

    responses to other classmates. Complete your participation for this assignment

    by the end of the week. NSG 6435 : Family Health III Pediatrics.

    For this assignment, you will complete an iHuman case study

    based on the course objectives and weekly content. iHuman cases emphasize core

    learning objectives for an evidence-based primary care curriculum. Throughout

    your nurse practitioner program, you will use the iHuman case studies to

    promote the development of clinical reasoning through the use of ongoing

    assessments and diagnostic skills and to develop patient care plans that are

    grounded in the latest clinical guidelines and evidence-based practice.

    The iHuman assignments are highly interactive and a dynamic

    way to enhance your learning. Material from the iHuman cases may be present in

    the quizzes, the midterm exam, and the final exam.

    Click here for information on how to access and navigate

    iHuman.

    This week, complete the iHuman case titled “Buddy (Theodore,

    Jr.) VE.”

    Apply information from the iHuman Case Study to answer the

    following questions:

    Why is developmental assessment essential in the provision

    of primary care for infants, children, and adolescents, and what are the

    essential components of this assessment on the basis of a child’s age?

    Which tools will you use to assess specific components of

    development (such as speech, motor skills, social skills, etc.)? Which tools do

    you think are the most accurate in assessing the developmental components and

    why?

    Which components would you consider in assessing the basic

    biological functioning and well-being of your pediatric patients? Why are these

    components important in providing primary health-care services to children? NSG 6435 : Family Health III Pediatrics.

    Week 3

    discussion

    Aquifer Case Study – Developmental Evaluation and Screening

    This discussion assignment provides a forum for discussing

    relevant topics for this week based on the course competencies covered. For

    this assignment, make sure you post your initial response to the Discussion

    Area by the due date assigned.

    To support your work, use your course textbook readings and

    the South University Online Library. As in all assignments, cite your sources

    in your work and provide references for the citations in APA format.

    Start reviewing and responding to the postings of your

    classmates as early in the week as possible. Respond to at least two of your

    classmates’ initial postings. Participate in the discussion by asking a

    question, providing a statement of clarification, providing a point of view

    with a rationale, challenging an aspect of the discussion, or indicating a

    relationship between two or more lines of reasoning in the discussion. Cite

    sources in your responses to other classmates. Complete your participation for

    this assignment by the end of the week.

    For this NSG 6435 : Family Health III Pediatrics assignment, you will complete a Aquifer case study based on the course objectives and weekly content. Aquifer cases emphasize core learning objectives for an evidence-based primary care curriculum. Throughout your nurse practitioner program, you will use the Aquifer case studies to promote the development of clinical reasoning through the use of ongoing assessments and diagnostic skills and to develop patient care plans that are grounded in the latest clinical guidelines and evidence-based practice.

    The Aquifer assignments are highly interactive and a dynamic way to enhance your  earning. Material from the Aquifer cases may be present in the quizzes, the midterm exam, and the final exam.

    Click here for information on how to access and navigate

    Aquifer.

    This week, complete the Aquifer case titled “CLIPP Case 2:

    Infant well-child (2, 6, and 9 months) – Asia.”

    Apply information from the Aquifer Case Study to answer the

    following questions:

    Discuss the history that you would take on this child in

    preparation for the well-child visit. Include questions regarding her growth

    and development that are appropriate for her age.

    Describe the developmental tool to be used for Asia, its

    reliability and validity and how Asia scored developmentally on this tool. Is

    she developmentally appropriate for her age?

    What immunizations will Asia be given at this visit; what is

    the patient education and follow-up?

    Week 4

    discussion

    iHuman Case Study – HEENT and Respiratory Infections

    This discussion assignment provides a forum for discussing

    relevant topics for this week based on the course competencies covered. For

    this assignment, make sure you post your initial response to the Discussion

    Area by the due date assigned.

    To support your work, use your course textbook readings and

    the South University Online Library. As in all assignments, cite your sources

    in your work and provide references for the citations in APA format.

    Start reviewing and responding to the postings of your

    classmates as early in the week as possible. Respond to at least two of your

    classmates’ initial postings. Participate in the discussion by asking a

    question, providing a statement of clarification, providing a point of view

    with a rationale, challenging an aspect of the discussion, or indicating a

    relationship between two or more lines of reasoning in the discussion. Cite

    sources in your responses to other classmates. Complete your participation for

    this assignment by the end ot the week.

    For this assignment, you will complete an iHuman case study

    based on the course objectives and weekly content. iHuman cases emphasize core

    learning objectives for an evidence-based primary care curriculum. Throughout

    your nurse practitioner program, you will use the iHuman case studies to

    promote the development of clinical reasoning through the use of ongoing

    assessments and diagnostic skills and to develop patient care plans that are

    grounded in the latest clinical guidelines and evidence-based practice.

    The iHuman assignments are highly interactive and a dynamic

    way to enhance your learning. Material from the iHuman cases may be present in

    the quizzes, the midterm exam, and the final exam.

    Click here for information on how to access and navigate

    iHuman.

    This week, complete the iHuman case titled “Katherine

    Harris V3.1 PC.”

    Apply information from the iHuman Case Study to answer the

    following questions:

    Do you recommend a limited or an involved use of antibiotics

    in treatment of these diseases and other unconfirmed bacterial illnesses and

    why? What are the standards regarding the use of antibiotics in pediatric

    population, and what assessment findings would warrant prescribing an

    antibiotic for Asthma symptoms?

    Using national guidelines and evidence-based literature,

    develop an Asthma Action Plan for this patient.

    Do the etiology, diagnosis, and management of a child who is

    wheezing vary according to the child’s age? Why or why not? Which objective of

    the clinical findings will guide your diagnosis? Why? When is a chest x-ray

    indicated in this case?

    Week 5

    discussion

    iHuman Case Study – Cardiovascular and Hematologic Disorders

    in Children

    This discussion assignment provides a forum for discussing

    relevant topics for this week based on the course competencies covered. For

    this assignment, make sure you post your initial response to the Discussion

    Area by the due date assigned.

    To support your work, use your course textbook readings and

    the South University Online Library. As in all assignments, cite your sources

    in your work and provide references for the citations in APA format.

    Start reviewing and responding to the postings of your

    classmates as early in the week as possible. Respond to at least two of your

    classmates’ initial postings. Participate in the discussion by asking a question,

    providing a statement of clarification, providing a point of view with a

    rationale, challenging an aspect of the discussion, or indicating a

    relationship between two or more lines of reasoning in the discussion. Cite

    sources in your responses to other classmates. Complete your participation for

    this assignment by the end of the week.

    For this assignment, you will complete an iHuman case study

    based on the course objectives and weekly content. iHuman cases emphasize core

    learning objectives for an evidence-based primary care curriculum. Throughout

    your nurse practitioner program, you will use the iHuman case studies to

    promote the development of clinical reasoning through the use of ongoing

    assessments and diagnostic skills and to develop patient care plans that are

    grounded in the latest clinical guidelines and evidence-based practice.

    The iHuman assignments are highly interactive and a dynamic

    way to enhance your learning. Material from the iHuman cases may be present in

    the quizzes, the midterm exam, and the final exam.

    Click here for information on how to access and navigate

    iHuman.

    This week, complete the iHuman case titled “Mia Zavarro V4.”

    Apply information from the iHuman Case Study to answer the

    following questions:

    How would you evaluate and manage a pediatric patient who

    has a painful swelling of the hands and feet, fatigue, or fussiness? Which

    diagnostic studies would you recommend for this patient and why?

    What physical exam findings and diagnostic results would be

    concerning to you and why? What would be three differentials in this case?

    In SCD, the spleen doesn’t work properly or doesn’t work at

    all. This problem makes people with SCD more likely to get severe infections.

    What is the treatment for Miah and education for the family?

    Week 6

    discussion

    iHuman Case Study – Common Pediatric Illnesses

    This discussion assignment provides a forum for discussing

    relevant topics for this week based on the course competencies covered. For

    this assignment, make sure you post your initial response to the Discussion

    Area by the due date assigned.

    To support your work, use your course textbook readings and

    the South University Online Library. As in all assignments, cite your sources

    in your work and provide references for the citations in APA format.

    Start reviewing and responding to the postings of your

    classmates as early in the week as possible. Respond to at least two of your

    classmates’ initial postings. Participate in the discussion by asking a

    question, providing a statement of clarification, providing a point of view

    with a rationale, challenging an aspect of the discussion, or indicating a

    relationship between two or more lines of reasoning in the discussion. Cite

    sources in your responses to other classmates. Complete your participation for

    this assignment by the end of the week.

    For this assignment, you will complete an iHuman case study

    based on the course objectives and weekly content. iHuman cases emphasize core

    learning objectives for an evidence-based primary care curriculum. Throughout

    your nurse practitioner program, you will use the iHuman case studies to

    promote the development of clinical reasoning through the use of ongoing

    assessments and diagnostic skills and to develop patient care plans that are

    grounded in the latest clinical guidelines and evidence-based practice.

    The iHuman assignments are highly interactive and a dynamic

    way to enhance your learning. Material from the iHuman cases may be present in

    the quizzes, the midterm exam, and the final exam.

    Click here for information on how to access and navigate

    iHuman.

    This week, complete the iHuman case titled “Samantha

    Graves V3 PC”

    Apply information from the iHuman Case Study to answer the

    following questions:

    Which essential questions will you ask a pediatric patient or

    his or her caregiver when the presenting complaint is bloody diarrhea? Will

    these questions vary depending upon the child’s age? Why or why not? What

    clinical or historical findings will indicate the need for diagnostic studies

    and why? Which diagnostic studies will you initially order and why?

    What would be three differential diagnoses in this case?

    How do the common causes of vomiting differ in infants,

    children, and adolescents? What clinical or historical findings will indicate

    the need for diagnostic studies and why? Which diagnostic studies will you

    initially order and why?

    Week 7

    discussion

    Comprehensive Case Study

    General Guidelines for Comprehensive Case Study – Week 7

    Project

    Your case study should not be just a SOAP note of a patient

    encounter—it should be a comprehensive evaluation of an iHuman patient case.

    You will complete a Comprehensive SOAP note on the approved

    Pediatric SOAP Note template based on the findings of the iHuman case – then

    major research and discussion of the disease process are presented.

    This case study should be a summative evaluation supported

    by a minimum of 5 evidence-based articles.

    Evaluation of the case study should be no more than 3-4

    substantive paragraphs. A minimum of five evidence-based sources (in addition

    to your text) should be used for your case study.

    Course texts will not count as a scholarly source; if using

    data from websites you must go back to the literature source for the

    information-no secondary sources are allowed, ie, Medscape, UptoDate, etc.

    This week, complete the iHuman case titled “Tommy Acker

    V3”.

    Please submit your Comprehensive SOAP Note and Growth Chart

    in the Submissions Area by the due date assigned.

    Name your SOAP note document

    SU_NSG6435_W7_A1_lastname_firstinitial.doc

    Week 8

    discussion

    iHuman Case Study – Neurological Disorders and Cognitive

    Perceptual Problems in Children

    This discussion assignment provides a forum for discussing

    relevant topics for this week based on the course competencies covered. For

    this assignment, make sure you post your initial response to the Discussion

    Area by the due date assigned.

    To support your work, use your course textbook readings and

    the South University Online Library. As in all assignments, cite your sources

    in your work and provide references for the citations in APA format.

    Start reviewing and responding to the postings of your

    classmates as early in the week as possible. Respond to at least two of your

    classmates’ initial postings. Participate in the discussion by asking a

    question, providing a statement of clarification, providing a point of view

    with a rationale, challenging an aspect of the discussion, or indicating a

    relationship between two or more lines of reasoning in the discussion. Cite

    sources in your responses to other classmates. Complete your participation for

    this assignment by the end of the week.

    For this assignment, you will complete an iHuman case study

    based on the course objectives and weekly content. iHuman cases emphasize core

    learning objectives for an evidence-based primary care curriculum. Throughout

    your nurse practitioner program, you will use the iHuman case studies to

    promote the development of clinical reasoning through the use of ongoing

    assessments and diagnostic skills and to develop patient care plans that are

    grounded in the latest clinical guidelines and evidence-based practice.

    The iHuman assignments are highly interactive and a dynamic

    way to enhance your learning. Material from the iHuman cases may be present in

    the quizzes, the midterm exam, and the final exam.

    Click here for information on how to access and navigate

    iHuman.

    This week, complete the iHuman case titled “Timothy Adams V3

    PC”.

    Apply information from the iHuman Case Study to answer the

    following questions:

    What do you believe is your best course of action for this

    appointment?

    What clinical or historical findings will indicate the need

    for diagnostic studies and why? Which diagnostic studies will you initially

    order and why?

    What would be three differentials in this case?

    Week 9

    discussion

    Infectious Diseases in Children

    The discussion assignment provides a forum for discussing

    relevant topics for this week on the basis of the course competencies covered.

    For this assignment, make sure you post your initial

    response to the Discussion Area by the due date assigned.

    To support your work, use your course and textbook readings

    and the South University Online Library. As in all assignments, cite your

    sources in your work and provide references for the citations in APA format.

    Start reviewing and responding to the postings of your

    classmates as early in the week as possible. Respond to at least two of your

    classmates’ initial postings. Participate in the discussion by asking a

    question, providing a statement of clarification, providing a point of view

    with a rationale, challenging an aspect of the discussion, or indicating a

    relationship between two or more lines of reasoning in the discussion. Cite

    sources in your responses to your classmates. Complete your participation for

    this assignment by the end of the week.

    Using your course and textbook readings and the South

    University Online Library, perform research on the following:

    Assessment, diagnostic testing, and management of infectious

    conditions in a pediatric patient

    Differential diagnoses for presentation of symptoms

    involving infectious diseases in pediatric patients

    After completing your research, consider this scenario:

    An eighteen-month-old child, well-known to your practice,

    presents with a seven-day history of fever ranging from 101 to 104.7 degrees

    Fahrenheit. On the fourth day of the fever, the emergency department had

    performed the following tests:

    A blood and urine culture

    A complete blood count

    A comprehensive metabolic panel

    The culture reports were found to be negative.

    Today, the vitals of the child are the following:

    Temperature: 101.5 degrees Fahrenheit

    Heart rate: 120 beats/minute

    Respiratory rate: 20 breaths/minute

    Blood pressure: 90/40

    Physical examination of the child indicates the following

    positive findings:

    Injected conjunctiva

    Palmar redness

    Magenta-colored lips

    Red macula

    Excoriating rashes in the diaper area

    On the basis of the above information, respond to the

    following:

    What will be your differential diagnoses for this patient?

    What specific physical exam findings support these

    differential diagnoses?

    Of the differential diagnoses you listed, which would be the

    most concerning?

    What additional diagnostic tests will you recommend? Why?

    What would be your focus for caregiver education?

    Week 10

    discussion

    iHuman Case Study – Adolescent Risk Behaviors

    This discussion assignment provides a forum for discussing

    relevant topics for this week based on the course competencies covered. For

    this assignment, make sure you post your initial response to the Discussion

    Area by the due date assigned.

    To support your work, use your course textbook readings and

    the South University Online Library. As in all assignments, cite your sources

    in your work and provide references for the citations in APA format.

    Start reviewing and responding to the postings of your

    classmates as early in the week as possible. Respond to at least two of your

    classmates’ initial postings. Participate in the discussion by asking a

    question, providing a statement of clarification, providing a point of view

    with a rationale, challenging an aspect of the discussion, or indicating a

    relationship between two or more lines of reasoning in the discussion. Cite

    sources in your responses to other classmates. Complete your participation for

    this assignment by the end of the week.

    For this assignment, you will complete an iHuman case study

    based on the course objectives and weekly content. iHuman cases emphasize core

    learning objectives for an evidence-based primary care curriculum. Throughout

    your nurse practitioner program, you will use the iHuman case studies to

    promote the development of clinical reasoning through the use of ongoing

    assessments and diagnostic skills and to develop patient care plans that are

    grounded in the latest clinical guidelines and evidence-based practice.

    The iHuman assignments are highly interactive and a dynamic

    way to enhance your learning. Material from the iHuman cases may be present in

    the quizzes, the midterm exam, and the final exam.

    Click here for information on how to access and navigate

    iHuman.

    This week, complete the iHuman case titled “Angela

    Cotez V3.1 PC”.

    Apply information from the iHuman Case Study to answer the

    following questions:

    Describe the evaluation tool and explain why this tool is

    essential in the care of the adolescent patient population.

    Apply the findings of the scholarly research articles to the

    use of this evaluation tool and describe its validity and reliability.

    Apply this evaluation tool to a patient situation and

    summarize your opinion of the results.

    Describe a plan of care for the patient, depending upon the

    results.

  • nsg3039 – Technology’s Impact on Population Health

    nsg3039 – Technology’s Impact on Population Health

    The discussion assignment provides a forum for discussing

    relevant topics for this week on the basis of the course competencies covered.

    By the due date assigned, post a response to one of the two

    discussion topics below, using information from the lectures, reading

    assignments, library resources, and Internet resources. All responses should be

    posted to the Discussion Area.

    To support your work, use your course and textbook readings and also use the South University Online Library. As in all assignments, cite your sources in your work and provide references for the citations in APA format.

    ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

    Tasks:

    Advances in technology have fed the explosion of wearable

    devices and patient self-monitoring. How can nurses leverage this technology to

    promote healthy lifestyles and improved compliance with self-care and

    monitoring?

    There are vast quantities of consumer data available today.

    For example, every time you use your grocery store loyalty card, data about what

    you purchased is collected, analyzed, and saved. This data in the hands of

    population health professionals can contribute to the creation of healthy

    lifestyle programs. However, the same data in the hands of health insurance

    plans could lead to higher insurance costs of denial of insurance. Should there

    be regulations on how these consumer data are used? nsg3039 – Technology’s Impact on Population Health

    Citations should conform to APA guidelines. You may use this

    APA Citation Helper as a convenient reference for properly citing resources or

    connect to the APA style website through the APA icon below.

    By the end of the week, comment on at least two of your

    peers’ responses. You can ask questions or respond generally to the overall

    experience. Be objective, clear, and concise. Always use constructive language,

    even in criticism, to work toward the goal of positive progress. All comments

    should be posted to the Discussion Area nsg3039 – Technology’s Impact on Population Health.

  • ASSESSING THE GENITALIA AND RECTUM ESSAY ASSIGNMENT

    ASSESSING THE GENITALIA AND RECTUM ESSAY ASSIGNMENT

    Patients are frequently uncomfortable discussing with health care professional’s issues that involve the genitalia and rectum; however, gathering an adequate history and properly conducting a physical exam are vital. Examining case studies of genital and rectal abnormalities can help prepare advanced practice nurses to accurately assess patients with problems in these areas.

    In this assignment, you will consider case studies that describe abnormal findings in patients seen in a clinical setting.In this assignment, you will analyze a SOAP note case study that describes abnormal findings in patients seen in a clinical setting. You will consider what history should be collected from the patients, as well as which physical exams and diagnostic tests should be conducted. You will also formulate a differential diagnosis with several possible conditions.
    GENITALIA ASSESSMENT
    Subjective:

    ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

    CC: “I have bumps on my bottom that I want to have checked out.”

    HPI: AB, a 21-year-old WF college student reports to your clinic with external bumps on her genital area. She states the bumps are painless and feel rough. She states she is sexually active and has had more than one partner over the past year. Her initial sexual contact occurred at age 18. She reports no abnormal vaginal discharge. She is unsure how long the bumps have been there but noticed them about a week ago. Her last Pap smear exam was 3 years ago, and no dysplasia was found; the exam results were normal. She reports one sexually transmitted infection (chlamydia) about 2 years ago. She completed the treatment for chlamydia as prescribed. Assessing the genitalia and rectum essay assignment.

    PMH: Asthma

    Medications: Symbicort 160/4.5mcg

    Allergies: NKDA

    FH: No hx of breast or cervical cancer, Father hx HTN, Mother hx HTN, GERD

    Social: Denies tobacco use; occasional etoh, married, 3 children (1 girl, 2 boys)

    Objective:

    VS: Temp 98.6; BP 120/86; RR 16; P 92; HT 5’10”; WT 169lbs

    Heart: RRR, no murmurs

    Lungs: CTA, chest wall symmetrical

    Genital: Normal female hair pattern distribution; no masses or swelling. Urethral meatus intact without erythema or discharge. Perineum intact with a healed episiotomy scar present. Vaginal mucosa pink and moist with rugae present, pos for firm, round, small, painless ulcer noted on external labia

    Abd: soft, normoactive bowel sounds, neg rebound, neg murphy’s, neg McBurney

    Diagnostics: HSV specimen obtained Assessing the genitalia and rectum essay assignment

    Assessment:

    Chancre

    PLAN: This section is not required for the assignments in this course (NURS 6512) but will be required for future courses.

    To prepare:
    With regard to the SOAP note case study provided:

    Review this week’s Learning Resources, and consider the insights they provide about the case study.

    Consider what history would be necessary to collect from the patient in the case study.

    Consider what physical exams and diagnostic tests would be appropriate to gather more information about the patient’s condition. How would the results be used to make a diagnosis?

    Identify 
    at least five
     possible conditions that may be considered in a differential diagnosis for the patient.

    To complete:
    Refer to Chapter 5 of the Sullivan text. Analyze the SOAP note case study. Using evidence based resources, answer the following questions and support your answers using current evidence from the literature. Assessing the genitalia and rectum essay assignment.

    Analyze the subjective portion of the note. List additional information that should be included in the documentation.

    Analyze the objective portion of the note. List additional information that should be included in the documentation.

    Is the assessment supported by the subjective and objective information? Why or Why not?

    Would diagnostics be appropriate for this case and how would the results be used to make a diagnosis?

    Would you reject/accept the current diagnosis? Why or why not? Identify three possible conditions that may be considered as a differential diagnosis for this patient. Explain your reasoning using at least 3 different references from current evidence based literature. Assessing the genitalia and rectum essay assignment.

  • nr305 – Healthy People Initiative

    nr305 – Healthy People Initiative

    This week’s graded discussion topic relates to the following

    Course Outcomes (COs).

    CO1 Utilize prior knowledge of theories and principles of

    nursing and related disciplines to explain expected client behaviors, while

    differentiating between normal findings, variations, and abnormalities. (PO 1)

    CO3 Utilize effective communication when performing a health

    assessment. (PO 3)

    The topic this week asks you to apply what you have learned

    to the following case study.

    ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

    As the school nurse working in a college health clinic, you

    see many opportunities to promote health. Maria is a 40-year-old Hispanic who

    is in her second year of nursing school. She complains of a 14-pound weight

    gain since starting school and is afraid of what this will do to both her

    appearance and health if the trend continues. After conducting her history, you

    learn that she is an excellent cook and she and her family love to eat foods

    that reflect their Hispanic heritage. She is married with two school-age

    children. She attends class a total of 15 hours per week, plus she must be

    present for 12 hours of labs and clinical. She maintains the household

    essentially by herself and does all the shopping, cooking, cleaning, and

    chauffeuring of the children. She states that she is lucky to get 6 hours of

    sleep per night, but that is okay with her. She lives 1 hour from campus and commutes

    each day. Using Healthy People 2020 (Links to an external site.)Links to an

    external site. and your text as a guide, answer the following questions.

    What additional information would you like to gather from

    Maria? nr305 – Healthy People Initiative.

    What are Maria’s real and potential health risks?

    Why is Maria’s culture important when obtaining the health

    assessment?

    Pick one of Maria’s health risks. What would be one

    reasonable short-term goal for this risk?

    What nursing interventions would you incorporate into

    Maria’s plan of care to assist her with meeting your chosen goal? Please

    provide rationale for your selections.

    Week 2 discussion

    General

    Survey/Skin/Nutrition

    This week’s graded discussion topic relates to the following

    Course Outcomes (COs).

    CO1 Utilize prior knowledge of theories and principles of

    nursing and related disciplines to explain expected client behaviors, while

    differentiating between normal findings, variations, and abnormalities. (PO 1)

    CO3 Utilize effective communication when performing a health

    assessment. (PO 3) nr305 – Healthy People Initiative.

    Your home health agency has received an order from a local

    hospital to evaluate and treat an elderly woman being discharged from its

    medical surgical unit.

    Millie Gardner, an 83-year-old female patient, is being

    discharged home today to the care of her husband Fred (87 years old) following

    a 9-day hospitalization for pneumonia, dehydration, and failure to thrive. She

    has a history of hypertension (HTN), Type II Diabetes, and cerebral vascular

    accident (CVA) with left-sided weakness. Patient is alert and oriented but does

    have periods of forgetfulness during the overnight hours. Patient has

    intermittent incontinence of bowel and bladder and requires assistance with all

    activities of daily living (ADLs).

    Medications:

    Lopressor

    Lisinopril

    Plavix

    Metformin

    Novolin R per sliding scale *NEW*

    Multivitamin

    Colace

    Zithromax *NEW*

    Upon arrival you are greeted by Champ, the couple’s

    rambunctious miniature Doberman pinscher dog. Millie is in her wheelchair

    staring blankly out the window, and Fred is busy in the kitchen preparing the

    couple’s lunch.

    Based on the scenario above, please use the general survey

    process to describe the areas that you would be observing immediately upon

    entry to the home. nr305 – Healthy People Initiative.

    What, if any, concerns related to Millie’s skin and

    nutritional status do you have?

    What nursing interventions will you include in the plan of

    care to address these concerns?What teaching strategies will you use to educate

    Millie and Fred on the new medications?Using the SBAR, please include the

    information that you will communicate to the physician’s office at the

    completion of the visit.

    Week 3 discussion

    Assessment of the

    Neurological System

    This week’s graded discussion topic relates to the following

    Course Outcomes (COs).

    CO1 Utilize prior knowledge of theories and principles of

    nursing and related disciplines to explain expected client behaviors, while

    differentiating between normal findings, variations, and abnormalities. (PO 1)

    CO2 Recognize the influence that developmental stages have

    on physical, psychosocial, cultural, and spiritual functioning. (PO 1)

    CO3 Utilize effective communication when performing a health

    assessment. (PO 3)

    Randy Adams is a 38-year-old male patient of Dr. Joseph

    Reynolds who was admitted yesterday morning for 24-hour observation for mild

    concussion following a motor vehicle accident. Randy lost consciousness during

    the accident and was very confused when he arrived in the ER after EMS

    transport. He is an Iraq war veteran and he seemed to think after the accident

    that this all happened in Iraq. Dr. Reynolds is concerned that Randy has some

    residual problems from a couple of explosive incidents that occurred while he

    was in Iraq. The physician is unsure whether Randy’s current symptoms are from

    the car accident or from prior injuries so he has referred him for

    consultations to both a neurologist and to a behavioral health specialist. nr305 – Healthy People Initiative.

    Based on the above please discuss the following.

    Pathophysiology of concussive injuries and treatment

    Neurological assessment tools used in your current practice

    setting (if not presently working, please describe one used during prior

    employment or schooling)

    Current best practices associated with post-traumatic stress

    disorder (PTSD)

    Nursing interventions you would include in this patient’s

    plan of care

    Week 4 discussion

    Assessment of Cardiac

    Status

    This week’s graded discussion topic relates to the following

    Course Outcomes (COs).

    CO1 Utilize prior knowledge of theories and principles of

    nursing and related disciplines to explain expected client behaviors, while

    differentiating between normal findings, variations, and abnormalities. (PO 1)

    CO3 Utilize effective communication when performing a health

    assessment. (PO 3)

    Esther Jackson is a 56-year-old black female who is 1-day

    post-op following a left radical mastectomy. During morning rounds, the

    off-going nurse shares with you during bedside report that the patient has been

    experiencing increased discomfort in her back throughout the night and has

    required frequent help with repositioning. She states that the patient was

    medicated for pain approximately 2 hours ago but is voicing little relief and

    states that you might want to mention that to the doctor when he rounds later

    this morning. With the patient appearing to be in no visible distress, you

    proceed on to the next patient’s room for report.

    Approximately 1 hour later, you return to Ms. Jackson’s room

    with her morning pills and find her slumped over the bedside stand in tears. The

    patient states, “I don’t know what is wrong, I don’t feel right. My back

    hurts and I’m just so tired. What is wrong with me?” The patient refuses

    to take her medications at this time stating that she is starting to feel sick

    to her stomach. nr305 – Healthy People Initiative.

    Just then the nursing assistant comes into the patient’s

    room to record Ms. Jackson’s vital signs, you take this opportunity to quickly

    research the patient’s medication record to determine if she has a medication

    ordered for nausea. Upon return, the nursing assistant hands you the following

    vital signs: T 37, R 18, and BP 132/54, but states she couldn’t get the

    patient’s pulse because “it is all over the place.“

    Please address the following questions related to the

    scenario.

    What do you suspect is the cause of the patient’s symptoms?

    Describe the course of action that you will take to confirm

    this suspicion and prevent further decline.

    What further assessments, lab values, and tests will likely

    be ordered for this patient and how often? If testing is to be completed more

    than once, please explain the rationale for doing so.

    While you are caring for this patient, how will you ensure

    that the needs of your other patients are being met?

    Week 5 discussion

    Assessment of

    Respiratory Status

    This week’s graded discussion topic relates to the following

    Course Outcomes (COs).

    CO1 Utilize prior knowledge of theories and principles of

    nursing and related disciplines to explain expected client behaviors, while

    differentiating between normal findings, variations, and abnormalities. (PO 1)

    CO3 Utilize effective communication when performing a health

    assessment. (PO 3)

    CO4 Identify teaching/learning needs from the health history

    of an individual. (PO 2)

    Please review the video above as it will provide you with an

    opportunity to immerse yourself in the role of a nurse addressing tobacco use

    during routine patient care. Click to review a transcript (Links to an external

    site.)Links to an external site. of this recording.

    While viewing, reflect on what you have learned about

    tobacco use and the role that nurses and other interdisciplinary team members

    play in helping to assist tobacco users with quitting. While viewing, it is

    also important to keep in mind that tobacco users move through stages of change

    in the process of quitting. They move from pre-contemplation to contemplation,

    contemplation to preparation; preparation to abstinence; abstinence to

    maintenance. Every stage requires a different strategy by a nurse.

    After watching the video, and reflecting on the information

    presented, address each of the following questions.

    What are the common symptoms associated with an exacerbation

    of COPD? nr305 – Healthy People Initiative.

    What assessment techniques will you use to assess Mary?

    Identify smoking strategies that would be appropriate for

    each of the encounters that Mary had with the nurse throughout the video that

    could have been used to assist Mary in quitting smoking.

    Find a resource in your community that could assist Mary.

    Start by searching the Internet for your local health department’s website.

    What services are available to Mary? Briefly describe the services that the

    state quit line provides. Does it meet the 4 As? Is it accessible, acceptable,

    affordable, or available for Mary?

    What will you do to follow-up on Mary’s smoking cessation

    process?

    Week 6 discussion

    Assessment of the

    Abdomen and Genitourinary System

    This week’s graded discussion topic relates to the following

    Course Outcomes (COs).

    CO1 Utilize prior knowledge of theories and principles of

    nursing and related disciplines to explain expected client behaviors, while

    differentiating between normal findings, variations, and abnormalities. (PO 1)

    CO2 Recognize the influence that developmental stages have

    on physical, psychosocial, cultural, and spiritual functioning. (PO 1)

    CO3 Utilize effective communication when performing a health

    assessment. (PO 3)

    Amira is a 27-year-old Syrian refugee who has been residing

    in a local homeless shelter since her arrival here in the United States 4 weeks

    ago. She was brought into the emergency room this morning via squad after being

    found by a shelter employee sitting in a pool of blood on the bathroom floor

    crying and holding her abdomen. Due to her limited English speaking abilities,

    she is unable to provide specific details as to her complaints but the shelter

    employee states that she has recently stopped eating and has not looked well

    for the past couple of days. nr305 – Healthy People Initiative.

    Based on the limited information provided, please answer the

    following questions.

    How will you prioritize your care of Amira, what assessments

    will you complete, and in what order? Please provide rationale for choosing

    this order.

    Are there any cultural beliefs/practices that must be taken

    into consideration when planning her care?

    Considering her symptoms of abdominal pain and bleeding, is

    it possible that her status as a homeless refugee is a causative or

    contributing factor to her illness? Please provide rationale for your response.

    Week 7 discussion

    Assessment of the

    Musculoskeletal System and Pain

    This week’s graded discussion topic relates to the following

    Course Outcomes (COs).

    CO1 Utilize prior knowledge of theories and principles of

    nursing and related disciplines to explain expected client behaviors, while

    differentiating between normal findings, variations, and abnormalities. (PO 1)

    CO2 Recognize the influence that developmental stages have

    on physical, psychosocial, cultural, and spiritual functioning. (PO 1)

    CO3 Utilize effective communication when performing a health

    assessment. (PO 3)

    Fred is an 83-year-old male who is being admitted to the

    medical-surgical unit status post fall. He is alert and oriented and reports

    that while visiting a local casino with his wife Margaret earlier this evening,

    he tripped over a curb and fell landing on his right side. After receiving

    morphine in the emergency room prior to transfer to your unit, Fred is rating

    his pain at 6/10. He has multiple bruises from his jawbone to his knee as well

    as a slight rotation of his right leg.

    Past medical history includes: myocardial infarction (MI) x

    2, peripheral vascular disease (PVD) with bilateral iliac stents,

    non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM), sleep apnea, and degenerative

    joint disease.

    Medications include: aspirin, Plavix, Lopressor, Lisinopril,

    and Metformin.

    After reviewing the above scenario please answer the

    following questions.

    Based on the information provided, how will you prioritize

    your care, what assessments will you include and in what order? Please provide

    rationale for your response.

    Considering this patient’s age, injury, past medical

    history, and list of current medications, what, if any, concerns do you have

    related to his potential need for surgery?

    Should surgery to repair his right femur be required; what

    type of clearance and pre-op orders would you anticipate receiving related to

    his diet, meds, lab work, and so on? nr305 – Healthy People Initiative.

    Week 8 discussion

    Rapid Assessment of a

    Client

    This week’s graded discussion topic relates to the following

    Course Outcomes (COs).

    CO1 Utilize prior knowledge of theories and principles of

    nursing and related disciplines to explain expected client behaviors, while

    differentiating between normal findings, variations, and abnormalities. (PO 1)

    CO2 Recognize the influence that developmental stages have

    on physical, psychosocial, cultural, and spiritual functioning. (PO 1)

    CO3 Utilize effective communication when performing a health

    assessment. (PO 3)

    CO5 Explore the professional responsibilities involved in

    conducting a comprehensive health assessment and provide appropriate

    documentation. (PO 6)

    Please choose one of the patient scenarios below. Next,

    complete a rapid assessment, and provide a SBAR report to a classmate. Remember

    to include all concepts of patient safety, standard precautions, and

    professional standards.

    You are covering for a coworker who is off the floor for

    lunch, when you suddenly hear a loud crash coming from a nearby patient room.

    You quickly run in and discover Mr. Johnson who was admitted yesterday with a

    diagnosis of cerebral vascular accident (CVA) unconscious on the floor between

    the bed and the bathroom. nr305 – Healthy People Initiative.

    You are called to the room of 2-year-old Jonah by his mother

    who states the child has suddenly started breathing very loudly and does not

    look right. Upon entering the room you quickly recognize that the child is in

    respiratory distress as his lips are cyanotic and the use of accessory muscles

    is evident.

    You are in the process of admitting Ashley, a 27 year old

    who is 28 weeks pregnant with her first child, to the obstetric unit for

    complaints of headache, dizziness, and swelling of her lower extremities when

    she suddenly begins seizing.

    Week 2

    Family Genetic History

    Family Genetic History Guidelines

    Purpose

    This assignment is to help you gain insight regarding the

    influence of genetics on an individual’s health and risk for disease. You are

    to obtain a family genetic history on a willing, nonrelated, adult participant.

    NOTE: failing to complete this assignment using an adult participant other than

    yourself will result in a 20% penalty deduction being applied.

    Course Outcomes

    This assignment enables the student to meet the following

    Course Outcomes.

    CO #3: Utilize effective communication when performing a

    health assessment. (PO #3)

    CO #5: Explore the professional responsibilities involved in

    conducting a comprehensive health assessment and providing appropriate

    documentation. (PO #6)

    When taking a family genetic history on an actual client, it

    is essential that the information is accurate. Please inform the person you are

    interviewing that they do not need to disclose information that they wish to

    keep confidential. If the adult participant decides not to share information,

    please write, “Does not want to disclose.” If the client fails to

    disclose answers to several items, you will need to find another client who is

    willing to share. nr305 – Healthy People Initiative.

    You are required to use the linked form for the Family

    Genetic History or you will earn a “0” for the assignment. In

    addition, assignments that do not follow the current guidelines or use the

    required form will be evaluated for evidence of an academic integrity

    violation.

    After the due date, there will be no opportunity for

    revision or resubmission of assignments that have been uploaded to the

    submission area. It is your responsibility to submit the correct assignment to

    the correct submission area.

    Directions

    Refer to the examples in Chapter 4 of your textbook that

    discuss development of a genogram.

    Download the required NR305_Family_Genetic_History_Form (Links

    to an external site.)Links to an external site.. You will document the adult

    participant’s family genetic history using this MS Word document.

    Complete the family genetic history using the information

    that the adult participant is willing to share with you. The focus of this

    course is on the normal healthy individual so your paper does not need to

    contain much medical/nursing detail. Refer to your textbook or the Internet to

    learn what impact the family’s health history may have on the adult participant’s

    personal state of wellness both now and in the future. This paper does not

    require APA formatting, but you are expected to write clearly and use proper

    grammar and spelling. Developing a pictorial genogram using symbols to identify

    certain relationships (e.g., divorced, sibling, deceased, etc.), may provide

    more insight, however, drawing may be difficult to accomplish with MS Word,

    therefore you are not expected to use symbols, lines, or other drawing

    elements. Instead, describe the relationships among the various people in the

    adult participant’s family’s genetic history. Remember, the goal is not to

    learn how to draw with Word, but to gather information about the family and

    recognize its significance to the adult participant and that person’s health.

    Save the completed form by clicking on Save as and add your

    last name to the file name, for example,

    NR305_Family_Genetic_History_Form_Smith.

    Submit the completed form to the Family Genetic History form

    by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 2. Please post questions about this

    assignment to the weekly Q & A Forums so the entire class may view the

    answers. nr305 – Healthy People Initiative.

    Week 4

    Course Project Milestone 1

    Course Project Milestone 1: Health History Guidelines

    Purpose

    The student will obtain a health history on a willing,

    nonrelated, adult participant in order to generate written documentation that

    is clear and accurate. Note: Failing to complete this assignment using an adult

    participant other than yourself will result in a 20% penalty deduction being

    applied.

    Course Outcomes

    This assignment enables the student to meet the following

    Course Outcomes.

    CO #3: Utilize effective communication when performing a

    health assessment. (PO #3)

    CO #4: Identify teaching/learning needs from the health

    history of an individual. (PO #2)

    CO #5: Explore the professional responsibilities involved in

    conducting a comprehensive health assessment and providing appropriate

    documentation. (PO #6)

    The Course Project Milestone 1: Health History assignment is

    to be submitted by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 4. Post questions

    to the Q & A Forum. Contact your instructor if you need additional

    assistance.

    Disclaimer

    The focus of this assignment is on communicating details

    within the written client record. When taking a health history on an actual

    client, it is essential that the information is accurate. Please inform the

    person you are interviewing that they do not need to disclose information that

    they wish to keep confidential. If the interviewee decides not to share

    information, please write, “Does not want to disclose.” If the client

    fails to disclose answers to several items, you will need to find another

    client who is willing to share.

    You are required to use the linked form for Milestone 1 or

    you will earn a “0” for the assignment. In addition, assignments that

    do not follow the current guidelines or use the required form will be evaluated

    for evidence of an academic integrity violation.

    After the due date, there will be no opportunity for

    revision or resubmission of assignments that have been uploaded to the

    submission area. It is your responsibility to submit the correct assignment to

    the correct submission area. nr305 – Healthy People Initiative.

    Directions

    Find an adult who is not related to you who is willing to

    let you take a health history.

    Download the required NR305_Milestone1_Form (Links to an

    external site.)Links to an external site.. You will type your answers directly

    into this Word document. Your paper does not need to follow APA formatting;

    however, you are expected to be clear in your communication by using correct

    medical terminology, grammar, and spelling.

    Review the examples in Chapter 4 of your textbook to gain

    insight into how to document the health history. Remember this is a health

    history, not a physical examination. Avoid words like frequently, improved,

    increased, decreased, good, poor, normal, or WNL as they may have different

    meanings for different people. Instead, document the specific data that led you

    to these conclusions, for example, 3x/day instead of frequently, or consuming

    four servings of vegetables/day instead of increased vegetable servings.

    Save the file by clicking Save as and adding your last name

    to the file name, for example, NR305_Milestone1_Form_Smith.

    Submit the completed form by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT at the

    end of Week 4.

    Please post questions in the Q & A Forum so the entire

    class may view the answers.

    Week 6

    Course Project Milestone 2

    Course Project Milestone 2: Patient Teaching Plan Guidelines

    The purpose of this paper is to apply information gathered

    from the Family Genetic History and Milestone 1 assignments to identify one

    modifiable risk factor and develop an evidence-based teaching plan that

    promotes health as well as improves patient outcomes.

    Course Outcomes

    This assignment enables the student to meet the following

    Course Outcomes. nr305 – Healthy People Initiative.

    CO4: Identify teaching/learning needs from the health

    history of an individual. (PO2)

    This assignment is worth a total of 225 points.

    Rubric

    Click to view and download the Milestone 2 Grading Rubric

    (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..

    The assignment is to be submitted by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT

    at the end of Week 6.

    General Directions & Project Guidelines

    Application: Use Microsoft Word 2010™ or later to create

    this assignment.

    This paper is to be written in APA format. Please use the

    recommended assignment specific APA Template (Links to an external site.)Links

    to an external site. linked here to type on. The SSPRNBSN resource has a great

    section on writing scholarly papers and APA formatting (to find resource watch:

    http://www.brainshark.com/devry/Student_Success_Strategies/zHszgnQAKzBXqbz0

    (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.)

    APA formatting helps you to format your paper in a

    professional manner and provides consistent methods for citing your sources

    within the paper and providing the complete reference on the reference page.

    See the documents in the APA category in Course Resources for assistance with

    APA formatting.

    This paper is expected to be no more than four pages in

    length (not including the title page and reference list).

    Please use the categories listed below as the first level

    headings for each section of your paper (Exception: Instead of

    “Introduction” please use the title of your paper).

    Content Guidelines

    Using the information gathered in your Genetic Family

    History and Milestone 1 assignments, you will identify and research one

    modifiable risk factor. You will develop an evidence-based teaching plan that

    promotes health, with the aim of improving patient outcomes related to this

    modifiable risk factor.

    Introduction (1 paragraph): The introduction should be

    interesting and capture the reader’s attention.

    State one preventable disease your adult participant is at

    risk for developing (obesity, Type 2 Diabetes, etc.), based on the information

    you have gathered during this course.

    Introduce one modifiable risk factor (diet, smoking,

    sedentary lifestyle, etc.) associated with the preventable disease you

    described.

    Clearly state the purpose of your paper. The purpose

    statement should relate to developing a patient teaching plan.

    Preventable Disease Overview (1-2 paragraphs): Please use

    course materials and scholarly sources to complete this section. Be sure to

    paraphrase and include citations as needed!

    Describe briefly the preventable disease you identified in

    the introduction.

    What are the signs and symptoms associated with this

    disease?

    How is it diagnosed? Notable information from Health History

    and General Survey? Signs and symptoms? Risk assessments? Lab values?

    What physical assessment findings would be associated with

    this disease?

    How did you identify your adult participant’s risk for this

    disease?

    Specific information gathered in the Genetic Family History?

    Specific information gathered in the Milestone 1 assignment?

    Evidence Based Intervention (1-2 paragraphs):

    Choose and describe one evidence based intervention related

    to the modifiable risk factor you have chosen. (One that has been shown to be

    effective at reducing an individual’s risk for developing the preventable

    disease.) nr305 – Healthy People Initiative.

    Describe this intervention in detail, and provide rationale

    for your intervention utilizing:

    At least one scholarly peer-reviewed journal article. Go to

    the Chamberlain library at http:/library.chamberlain.edu (Links to an external

    site.)Links to an external site.. Search peer reviewed journals to find a

    scholarly article that discusses interventions associated with the modifiable

    risk factor you have chosen as the focus of your paper. Summarize what you

    learned from this article and cite the source in the text and reference page

    (Author, year). The article must be less than 10 years old. You may include and

    cite your textbook or other scholarly sources as well, but they do not count as

    the scholarly journal article.

    You must summarize and analyze the information from your

    sources in your own words. Avoid direct quotations. If you do include a short

    quotation, be sure to cite it properly.

    List short and long term goals you have for your participant

    related to this intervention.

    Implementation: Teaching Plan (1-2 paragraphs):

    Discuss in this section what methods you will use to teach

    your participant how to implement the intervention.

    What is it that you are asking them to do? (For example, if

    your intervention is “quit smoking”, what specific steps will you

    recommend your participant take to achieve this goal?)

    Describe any resources you would provide to the participant

    to help them understand and be successful (websites, community services,

    handouts, etc.).

    Evaluation (1 paragraph):

    Describe at least one method (weight, lab values, etc.) you

    would use to evaluate whether your intervention was effective.

    How would you revise you plan if it proved to be

    unsuccessful?

    Summary (1 paragraph):

    Summarize the main points of your paper.

    Reiterate what you hope to accomplish by implementing this

    intervention.

    End with a concluding statement.

    Reference Page:

    The Reference Page should start on a new page (insert a page

    break).

    All references should be cited within the body of the paper

    as (Author, year) and the full reference should be included in APA format on

    the reference page. nr305 – Healthy People Initiative.

    A URL link alone is not an adequate reference.

    See the Chamberlain Guidelines for Writing Professional

    Papers in Course Resources for examples of properly formatted references.

    Best Practices – Tips for Writing a Great Paper!

    Review the directions, guidelines, and grading rubric

    thoroughly.

    Use the APA template provided.

    Be clear. Write about one preventable disease, one

    modifiable risk factor, and one related intervention.

    Proofread prior to final submission. Having another person

    review your work is often helpful to catch grammar and spelling errors. (Spell

    check is not perfect!)

    Abide by the CCN academic integrity policy – use the

    Turnitin Draft Submission link found in the Introduction & Resources Module

    to ensure that your similarity index is less than 24%, if not, revise and

    resubmit prior to the deadline. Please review the documents related to TurnItIn

    in Course Resources. nr305 – Healthy People Initiative.

  • SNAPPS (summarize, narrow, analyze, probe, plan, and select)

    SNAPPS (summarize, narrow, analyze, probe, plan, and select)

    Week 5

    assignment

    Purpose

    SNAPPS is a learner-centered approach to case presentation

    in the clinical setting. This model allows the student to take an active role

    in their educational encounter by discussing the patient encounter beyond the

    facts, verbalizing their clinical reasoning, asking questions, and engaging in

    follow-up learning pertinent to the educational encounter. This exercise is

    designed to develop the student’s ability to organize patient information in a

    meaningful way and guide the student in their oral patient presentations in the

    clinical setting. SNAPPS (summarize, narrow, analyze, probe, plan, and select).

    Activity Learning Outcomes

    Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the

    ability to:

    ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

    1) Summarize

    patient findings into an organized oral presentation. (CO 1, 6)

    2) Demonstrate

    clinical reasoning skills. (CO 1)

    3) Identify

    their own knowledge gaps and inquire about uncertainties, difficulties, or

    alternative approaches. (CO 2)

    4) State a

    diagnostic and therapeutic plan for management of a patient. (CO 4)

    5) Select a

    case-related issue for self-study. (CO 3, 4)

    Due Date:

    The oral presentation and written assignment are due by

    Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT.

    Total Points Possible:

    100

    REQUIREMENTS:

    1. Using a

    patient seen in their clinical setting, students will give an oral presentation

    (via Voice Thread or Kaltura) using the 6-step learner-centered SNAPPS model

    to:

    • Summarize

    briefly the history and findings;

    • Narrow

    the differential to three relevant possibilities;

    • Analyze

    the differential by comparing and contrasting the possibilities;

    • Probe theb preceptor/instructor by asking questions about uncertainties, difficulties, or

    alternative approaches; SNAPPS (summarize, narrow, analyze, probe, plan, and select).

    • Plan

    management for the patient’s medical issues; and

    • Select a

    case-related issue for self-directed learning

    2. In

    addition to the oral presentation, the student will submit a written summary

    using the template provided.

    3. As part

    of the summary, the student will research the self-directed learning topic that

    was identified in the oral presentation to provide a written summary of what

    was learned using appropriate evidence-based, scholarly references.

    4. In-text

    citations and reference list provided must be in APA format.

    5. The

    presentation must be submitted to the Week 5 discussion board before Sunday,

    11:59 p.m. MT. The written portion of

    the assignment must be submitted on the template provided to the assignment box

    before Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT. SNAPPS (summarize, narrow, analyze, probe, plan, and select).

    PREPARING THE PAPER

    The written portion of this assignment is to be completed on

    the corresponding SNAPPS WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT TEMPLATE which will be submitted to

    the assignment box. There is also a

    SNAPPS ORAL PRESENTATION TEMPLATE which should serve as a guide for the oral

    presentation only (it is NOT submitted). Correct grammar, punctuation, and

    spelling should be observed. In-text

    citations and reference page should follow APA format. Scholarly evidence-based

    medicine (EBM) references must be used.

    Additionally, the following parameters should be set in the

    template before you begin:

    • Font:

    Times New Roman 11pt

    • Single

    space

    • Spacing

    set at 0pt before and after paragraphs (under page layout)

    Category Points % Description

    Summarize 10 10% A

    brief and concise oral summary is presented from the pertinent facts.

    Narrow the Differential Diagnosis 20 20% A minimum of two (2) but no more than

    four (4) diagnoses are given in the differential.

    Analyze the Differential 20 20% Differential

    is analyzed using key findings to argue for and against hypothesis and ranks

    the diagnoses in order of high to low likelihood.

    Probe the Preceptor 10 10% Gaps,

    points of confusion or dilemmas are identified in relation to the problem.

    Plan Management 20 20% A

    novice level diagnostic and therapeutic plan to manage the problem is proposed.

    Self-Directed Learning 10 10% One

    issue for self-directed learning as it relates to the case study is identified.

    Paper Format 10 10% Self-directed

    learning topic is researched and a written summary of what was learned is

    submitted on the SNAPPS presentation TEMPLATE, using appropriate scholarly

    references.

    Total 100 100% A

    quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above requirements. SNAPPS (summarize, narrow, analyze, probe, plan, and select).

  • nr443-caring-for-populations-milestone-3-intervention-and-evaluation

    nr443-caring-for-populations-milestone-3-intervention-and-evaluation
    .

    Caring for Populations Milestone 3:

    Intervention and Evaluation PowerPoint Guidelines

    Purpose

    The purpose of this PowerPoint presentation is to provide an

    opportunity to develop a community health nursing intervention and evaluation

    plan for a community health problem that you identified in your community

    (described in Milestone 2: Vulnerable Population Assessment). You will apply

    the components of the nursing process to assist this vulnerable population and

    develop a proposal that could be presented to community leaders.

    Course Outcomes

    This assignment enables the student to meet the following course

    outcomes.

    ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

    CO1: Apply principles of nursing theory to the

    public health system by analyzing determinants of health and the public health

    intervention wheel. (PO 1)

    CO3: Plan prevention and population-focused

    interventions for vulnerable populations using professional clinical judgment

    and evidence-based practice. (PO 4, 8)

    CO4: Evaluate the delivery of care for individuals, families, aggregates, and communities based on theories and principles of nursing and related disciplines. (PO 1)

    Due Date

    Submit your PowerPoint presentation by 11:59 p.m. MT Sunday by

    the end of Week 6.

    Points

    This assignment is worth a total of 225 points.

    Scenario

    You are a community public health nurse (C/PHN) working with the

    vulnerable population you identified in Milestone 2. You will choose a specific

    community health role that would serve this population. You have analyzed the

    data collected from your windshield survey and vulnerable population

    assignments (the first two milestones) and identified one community health

    problem that a nurse can impact. Now, review the scholarly literature or

    scholarly websites listed below and identify 
    one
     specific

    evidence-based nursing intervention
     that has the potential to improve

    the health of this group. Then develop a proposal to implement this

    intervention and a plan to evaluate the outcomes of this intervention. Create a

    PowerPoint that you could use to present to an organization in your community

    to request approval for funding and support for this intervention. (You are not

    required to implement the intervention or present your PowerPoint, though you

    may want to consider implementing your project in the future).

    Directions

    Watch the Milestone 3

    tutorial at.brainshark.com/devry/Milestone3_2016″>http://www.brainshark.com/devry/Milestone3_2016 (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..

    A.

    Introduction:
    (average of 2-3 slides)

    ·

    Describe the

    identified problem

    o Include at least 
    two important

    findings
     that demonstrate that this is a problem in your community.

    ·

    Describe your specific

    community health role: Some examples of roles are school nurse, parish nurse,

    home health nurse, occupational nurse, health department nurse etc.

    ·

    Identify the purpose

    of the presentation which is related to proposing a community health

    intervention and evaluation plan. nr443-caring-for-populations-milestone-3-intervention-and-evaluation.

    B.

    Identify

    an evidence based intervention:
     (average of 2-3 slides).

    ·

    Find an 
    evidence-based
     nursing

    intervention from a peer-reviewed journal article 
    OR
     one of

    the following databases. These databases evaluate research evidence about

    community health interventions. Be sure that your intervention is one that is

    recommended. Cite your source on the slide with the author or organization and

    year.

    o Use 
    at least one
     of the

    following to identify an evidence based intervention:

    ·

    A peer reviewed

    journal article demonstrating that your intervention has been successful

    ·

    The Community Guide (.thecommunityguide.org/”>http://www.thecommunityguide.org/ (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.) Choose one of the topics in the topic tab to

    find interventions. nr443-caring-for-populations-milestone-3-intervention-and-evaluation.

    ·

    The CDC Community

    Health Improvement Navigator Database of Interventions (.cdc.gov/chidatabase”>http://wwwn.cdc.gov/chidatabase (Links to an external

    site.)Links to an external site.)

    ·

    Healthy

    People 2020
     evidence-based

    interventions. Find a relevant topic area at (.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-objectives”>http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-objectives (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.), click on that topic area, and then click on

    the “Interventions and Resources” tab to see the evidence-based

    interventions list for that topic area

    ·

    Provide a brief

    overview of your intervention.

    ·

    Discuss why this

    intervention is a good fit for your community (why you expect it to be

    effective in your community).

    C.

    Intervention

    Implementation:
    (average of 3-4

    slides).

    Describe how you would implement your

    community health nursing intervention in your community

    ·

    Discuss the actions

    will you take as the community health nurse to accomplish this intervention.

    o Relate your actions to the Public Health

    Intervention Wheel (Nies & McEwen, 2015, p. 14, Figure 1-3)

    ·

    Identify your target

    population.

    ·

    Describe how you will

    reach out to your target population.

    ·

    Include strategies to engage

    your target population.

    ·

    Describe where the

    intervention will take place.

    ·

    Identify when your

    intervention will take place

    ·

    Will it take place

    once or multiple times?

    ·

    Identify those in the

    community that you will collaborate with (e.g., physician’s office, church,

    local resources, etc.). nr443-caring-for-populations-milestone-3-intervention-and-evaluation.

    ·

    Explain what level(s)

    of prevention is your intervention addressing (primary, secondary, or tertiary

    prevention)?

    D.

    Proposed

    Evaluation Methods:
     (average of 2-3

    slides)

    Your presentation must include at least one

    proposed quantitative or qualitative evaluation method that you would use to

    determine whether your intervention is effective. Outcome measurement is a

    crucial piece when implementing interventions.

    ·

    Describe the method

    you would use to evaluate whether your intervention was effective. (The.courselearn.net/lms/CourseExport/files/f8307374-3806-488d-ad09-c9d19c5b8c7f/NR443_W6_Qualitative_and_Quantitative_Evaluation_Methods.pdf”>Qualitative and

    Quantitative Education Methods (Links to an external

    site.)Links to an external site. handout can help with understanding qualitative and

    quantitative methods of evaluation).

    ·

    Identify the outcomes

    you would track to show whether your intervention works (eg. BMI would be one

    outcome you could track for a weight loss intervention).

    ·

    When would you measure

    these outcomes?

    ·

    Describe the

    short-term and long-term impact on your community if the intervention is

    successful.

    E.

    Summary:
     (average 1 slide)

    The summary should reiterate the main points

    of the presentation and conclude with what you are asking to be accomplished;

    for example, “Based on ABC, it is imperative our community has XYZ. Can we

    count on your support? Thank you for your consideration.“

    F.

    In addition to the

    slides described above, your presentation should include a title slide with

    your name and role and a reference slide. Cite all sources used with (Author,

    year) on the PowerPoint slide.

    G.

    The slides should

    include the most important points in 
    short bullet pointed phrases.

    Do not include full sentences or paragraphs on the PowerPoint slides. You may

    add additional comments in the notes section to clarify information for your

    instructor. nr443-caring-for-populations-milestone-3-intervention-and-evaluation.

    H.

    The slides should be

    visually appealing and not overcrowded. Use an interesting template and include

    some clipart or graphics for interest.

    Guidelines

    ·

    Application: Use

    Microsoft PowerPoint 2010 or later.

    ·

    Length: The PowerPoint

    slide show is expected to be 
    no more than 20 slides
     in length

    (not including the title slide and reference list slide).

    ·

    Save the assignment

    with your last name in the file title: example: “
    Smith Intervention and

    Evaluation
    .“

    ·

    Submission: Submit

    your PowerPoint file by 11:59 p.m. Sunday by the end of Week 6.

    ·

    Late Submission: See

    Policies on late submissions.

    ·

    Tutorial: For those

    not familiar with the development of a PowerPoint slideshow, the following link

    to the Microsoft website may be helpful..microsoft.com/en-us/support/training-FX101782702.aspx”>http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/support/training-FX101782702.aspx (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. The SSP Chamberlain Student Success

    Strategies offers a module on Computer Literacy that contains a section on

    PowerPoint. The link to SSP CCSSS may be found on your course list in the

    student portal.

    Best Practices in Preparing PowerPoint

    The following are best practices in preparing this presentation.

    ·

    Be creative.

    ·

    Incorporate graphics,

    clip art, or photographs to increase interest.

    ·

    Make easy to read with

    short bullet points and large font.

    ·

    Review directions

    thoroughly.

    ·

    Cite all sources

    within the slides with (author, year) as well as on the Reference slide.

    ·

    Proofread prior to

    final submission.

    ·

    Spell check for

    spelling and grammar errors prior to final submission.

    **Academic Integrity Reminder**

    Chamberlain College of Nursing values honesty and integrity. All

    students should be aware of the Academic Integrity policy and follow it in all

    discussions and assignments.

    By submitting this assignment, I pledge on my honor that all

    content contained is my own original work except as quoted and cited

    appropriately. I have not received any unauthorized assistance on this

    assignment.

    Please see the grading criteria and rubrics on this page.

    Rubric

    NR443_Milestone3

    NR443_Milestone3

    Criteria

    Ratings

    Pts

    This criterion is linked to a

    Learning OutcomeIntroductions
    The presentation

    begins with an introductory slide that introduces the problem, community

    findings, the nurse’s role, and the purpose.

    25.0 pts

    Presentation

    begins with at least one introductory slide that includes: • Introduction

    of the problem • Two important findings in the community • Nurse’s role •

    Purpose

    22.0 pts

    Introductory

    slide(s) is missing one of items listed in the first column.

    20.0 pts

    Introductory

    slide(s) is missing two items listed in the first column.

    nr443-caring-for-populations-milestone-3-intervention-and-evaluation

    10.0 pts

    Introductory

    slide(s) is missing three items listed in the first column.

    0.0 pts

    Introductory

    slide(s) not present or missing all four items listed in the first column.

    25.0 pts

    This criterion is linked to a

    Learning OutcomeEvidence-based

    Intervention and scholarly support
    One community health

    nursing intervention is described that includes support from a scholarly

    source and a discussion of why the intervention fits in this community.

    45.0 pts

    One community

    health nursing intervention is described with: • Support from at least one

    source listed in Guidelines and • Discussion of why intervention fits your

    community.

    40.0 pts

    One community

    health nursing intervention is identified but the scholarly support or

    discussion of how it fits is brief.

    36.0 pts

    One community

    health nursing intervention is identified but the support is not from a

    scholarly source or discussion of how it fits is missing.

    17.0 pts

    One intervention

    is described but it is not a community nursing intervention.

    0.0 pts

    The intervention

    is missing.

    45.0 pts

    This criterion is linked to a

    Learning OutcomeIntervention

    implementation details
    Specific

    interventions include actions related to the Public Health Intervention

    Wheel; target populations; outreach and engagement methods; locations of

    interventions; timing of interventions; interdisciplinary collaboration; and

    the level of prevention.

    50.0 pts

    Intervention

    specifics includes: • Actions related to Public Health Intervention Wheel •

    Target population identified • Outreach and engagement methods described. •

    Intervention location described. • Timing of intervention (number of

    sessions) included. • Collaborating with other disciplines discussed •

    Level(s) of prevention described (primary, secondary, and/or tertiary).

    44.0 pts

    Intervention is

    missing one specific detail from the first column.

    40.0 pts

    Intervention is

    missing two to three specific details from the first column. nr443-caring-for-populations-milestone-3-intervention-and-evaluation

    19.0 pts

    Intervention is

    missing four to five specific details from the first column.

    0.0 pts

    Intervention is

    missing six or more details from the first column.

    50.0 pts

    This criterion is linked to a

    Learning OutcomeEvaluation
    At least one

    evaluation method is offered with desired outcomes and discussion of

    short-term and long-term impact on the community if the proposed intervention

    succeeds.

    45.0 pts

    Presentation

    includes at least one clear evaluation plan with desired outcomes including

    discussion of the long-term and short-term impact on your community if the

    intervention is “successful.”

    40.0 pts

    Presentation

    includes at least one evaluation plan and discussion of long and short term

    impact but detail is lacking.

    36.0 pts

    Presentation

    includes one evaluation plan but is missing discussion on short or long

    term impact.

    17.0 pts

    Presentation

    includes only the long or short term impact on the community, and the

    evaluation plan is missing.

    0.0 pts

    Presentation lacks

    discussion of evaluation plan and impact.

    nr443-caring-for-populations-milestone-3-intervention-and-evaluation

    45.0 pts

    This criterion is linked to a

    Learning OutcomeSummary
    The summary

    reiterates the problem and the purpose of the intervention.

    20.0 pts

    Includes at least

    one summary slide that clearly reiterates the problem and purpose of the

    presentation.

    18.0 pts

    The summary

    generally describes the problem and the purpose.

    16.0 pts

    The summary

    briefly describes the problem and purpose.

    8.0 pts

    The summary lacks

    a description of the problem and purpose.

    0.0 pts

    Summary slide not

    present

    20.0 pts

    This criterion is linked to a

    Learning OutcomeOverall Presentation
    The PowerPoint

    presentation is clear, logical, appealing, creative, and easy to read.

    20.0 pts

    Presentation is

    presented in a clear and logical manner. PowerPoint is appealing to the eye

    and includes creativity. Bullet points with short phrases used instead of

    paragraphs. Font is easy to read.

    18.0 pts

    Presentation is

    clear and organized but slides are too busy.

    16.0 pts

    Presentation is

    organized but lacks creativity.

    8.0 pts

    Presentation is

    somewhat disorganized.

    0.0 pts

    Presentation is so

    disorganized it is difficult to understand its message.

    20.0 pts

    This criterion is linked to a

    Learning OutcomeMechanics
    The title slide

    includes the title of the presentation and the name of the student.The

    remaining slides contain correct grammar and spelling.All sources are cited

    and referenced appropriately.

    20.0 pts

    Excellent

    mechanics with minimal errors of the following: • Title slide with title

    and student name • Correct grammar and spelling • All sources cited in the

    text of slide • All references listed on the reference slide and in APA

    format (hanging indent not needed for PowerPoint).

    18.0 pts

    Good mechanics

    considering the elements listed in the first column.

    16.0 pts

    Fair mechanics considering

    the elements listed in the first column.

    8.0 pts

    Poor mechanics

    considering the elements listed in the first column.

    nr443-caring-for-populations-milestone-3-intervention-and-evaluation

    0.0 pts

    Very poor

    mechanics such that assignment is difficult to read.

    20.0 pts

    Total

    Points: 225.0

  • Ethical and Legal Implications of Prescribing Drugs – nurs 6521 Discussion

    Ethical and Legal Implications of Prescribing Drugs – nurs 6521 Discussion

    Week 2

    discussion

    Discussion: Ethical and Legal Implications of Prescribing

    Drugs

    What type of drug should you prescribe based on your

    patient’s diagnosis? How much of the drug should the patient receive? How often

    should the drug be administered? When should the drug not be prescribed? Are

    there individual patient factors that could create complications when taking

    the drug? Should you be prescribing drugs to this patient?

    ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

    These are some of the questions you might consider when

    selecting a treatment plan for a patient. As an advanced practice nurse

    prescribing drugs, you are held accountable for people’s lives on a daily

    basis. Patients and their families will often place trust in you because of

    your position. With this trust comes power and responsibility, as well as an

    ethical and legal obligation to “do no harm.” It is important that you are

    aware of current professional, legal, and ethical standards for advanced

    practice nurses with prescriptive authority. In this Discussion, you explore

    ethical and legal implications of scenarios and consider how to appropriately respond.

    Scenario 1:

    As a nurse practitioner, you prescribe medications for your

    patients. You make an error when prescribing medication to a 5-year-old

    patient. Rather than dosing him appropriately, you prescribe a dose suitable

    for an adult. Ethical and Legal Implications of Prescribing Drugs – nurs 6521 Discussion.

    Scenario 2:

    A friend calls and asks you to prescribe a medication for

    her. You have this autonomy, but you don’t have your friend’s medical history.

    You write the prescription anyway.

    Scenario 3:

    You see another nurse practitioner writing a prescription

    for her husband who is not a patient of the nurse practitioner. The

    prescription is for a narcotic. You can’t decide whether or not to report the

    incident.

    Scenario 4:

    During your lunch break at the hospital, you read a journal

    article on pharmacoeconomics. You think of a couple of patients who have

    recently mentioned their financial difficulties. You wonder if some of the

    expensive drugs you have prescribed are sufficiently managing the patients’

    health conditions and improving their quality of life.

    To prepare:

    Review Chapter 1 of the Arcangelo and Peterson text, as well

    as articles from the American Nurses Association, Anderson and Townsend, the

    Drug Enforcement Administration, and Philipsend and Soeken.

    Select one of the four scenarios listed above.

    Consider the ethical and legal implications of the scenario

    for all stakeholders involved such as the prescriber, pharmacist, patient, and

    the patient’s family. Ethical and Legal Implications of Prescribing Drugs – nurs 6521 Discussion.

    Think about two strategies that you, as an advanced practice

    nurse, would use to guide your ethically and legally responsible

    decision-making in this scenario.

    With these thoughts in mind:

    By Day 3

    Post an explanation of the ethical and legal implications of

    the scenario you selected on all stakeholders involved such as the prescriber,

    pharmacist, patient, and the patient’s family. Describe two strategies that

    you, as an advanced practice nurse, would use to guide your decision making in

    this scenario.

    By Day 6

    Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses and respond

    to at least two of your colleagues on two different days who selected a

    different scenario than you did, in one or more of the following ways:

    Suggest additional ethical and legal implications for all

    stakeholders in your colleagues’ scenarios.

    Offer and support an alternative perspective using readings

    from the classroom or from your own research in the Walden Library.

    Validate an idea with your own experience and additional

    research. Ethical and Legal Implications of Prescribing Drugs – nurs 6521 Discussion.