Author: admin

Discuss the Fall of the Soviet Union during the Cold War
,
Answer this in 2 pages, 500 words. Make sure to give a detailed discussion and please cite references.

Clergyman Mather Byles, not Benjamin Martin, famously said “Which is better: to be ruled by one tyrant three thousand miles away or by three thousand tyrants one mile away?” in reference to avoiding the chance of going to war with the seemingly unbeatable British. Had you been present during these debates and part of any colony, what side would you choose, and why?
Minimum 200 words. No references or citations are necessary.

I need 3 pages CRITIQUE PAPER by answering all these questions
1. What question did the study ask?
10 pts
2. Was the assignment of patients to treatments randomized appropriately? How does randomization affect bias in this study?
10 pts
3. Were the groups similar/equivalent at the start of the trial? How does similarity of groups affect bias in this study?
10 pts
4. Were the groups treated equally, aside from the differences associated with the allocated treatment? How does this approach affect bias in this study?
10 pts
5. Were all subjects enrolled in the trial accounted for in considering the sample and data analysis? How does the presence or absence of these strategies affect bias in this study?
10 pts
6. To what extent was “blinding” used in the study? How does the presence or absence of blinding affect bias in this study?
10 pts
7. Critique the reliability and validity reporting for the instruments used in the study. Discuss how the data analysis was appropriate to report the strength of the findings for an RCT.
10 pts
Critical Appraisal Related to External Validity
1. What is the overall strength, quality, and consistency of the evidence provided by the findings of this study?
10 pts
2. How generalizable are the findings of this study? How generalizable are the findings to your patients?
Are my patients so different from those in the study that the results cannot apply?
Is the treatment feasible in my setting?
Will the potential benefit(s) of treatment outweigh the potential
harm(s) of treatment for my patients?
10 pts
Overall use of critical appraisal and research terminology and adjectives.
10 pts
Attachments:
4859039_1_Critique-Article.pdf
4859039_2_Rubric-critique-pp.png

For this discussion, complete one main post (1A and 1B)
.
Post #1A After reading one of the two selections listed below, answer the following questions. (minimum 250 words)
What is the central point (thesis) of the piece?
Does the author provide evidence for his opinion? If so, cite an areas where evidence is used to support the main argument.
Is the counterargument presented? Cite an area where the opposing view is addressed.
Readings:
1. Alina Tugend’s “Multitasking Can Make You Lose…Um…Focus” pages 779 – 783
Alternative Math | Short Film
User:
n/a –
Added:
9/19/17
YouTube URL:

Post #1B After
watching the video, “Alternative Math” answer the following questions:
What is the writer/director’s goal in making this film?
What is the tone of the piece? Who do think is the intended audience?
Describe your reaction to the piece. Not whether you liked it or not, but whether you agree or disagree with the premise. Does it have any relationship to current affairs? If so how?
How do you know if a source is reliable?
Attachments:
4859074_1_alina-tugend–1.png
4859074_2_Alina-Tugend-2.png
4859074_3_Alina-Tugend–3.png

1.
Landscape
Using only these two texts, answer the following. DO NOT USE PUBLISHER’S NARRATIVE
Tim Cole. Holocaust Landscapes
Simon Schama Landscape and Memory
1. How does landscape impact the Holocaust? What is the difference between natural and constructed landscape in these discussions?

For this discussion, complete one main post (1A and 1B) and two peer responses.
For full participation credit, posts must occur on three or more days during the active week. First post should occur on or before Wednesday. See rubric for full assessment of discussion posts.
Post #1A After reading one of the two selections listed below, answer the following questions. (minimum 250 words)
What is the central point (thesis) of the piece?
Does the author provide evidence for his opinion? If so, cite an areas where evidence is used to support the main argument.
Is the counterargument presented? Cite an area where the opposing view is addressed.
Readings:
1. Alina Tugend’s “Multitasking Can Make You Lose…Um…Focus” pages 779 – 783
Alternative Math | Short Film
User:
n/a –
Added:
9/19/17
YouTube URL:

Post #1B After
watching the video, “Alternative Math” answer the following questions:
What is the writer/director’s goal in making this film?
What is the tone of the piece? Who do think is the intended audience?
Describe your reaction to the piece. Not whether you liked it or not, but whether you agree or disagree with the premise. Does it have any relationship to current affairs? If so how?
How do you know if a source is reliable?
Attachments:
4872238_1_alina-tugend–1.png
4872238_2_Alina-Tugend-2.png
4872238_3_Alina-Tugend–3.png