Author: admin

To a point I agree with what you said in your post, If you want to be technical both are good ways to determine the race to the White House. Whomever has the most votes from a specific state, wins the electoral votes from that state. I feel that voting is a popularity contest, and not about the issues that natter most. If you went with popular vote back in 2016, Hillary Clinton (whom I voted for) would be the first woman president in the history of this country, instead we have a person who lies, makes fun of people with disabilities, calls people names (Pocahontas, Sleepy Joe, Shifty Schiff), supports White Nationalists, and White Supremacists with comments like “very fine people on both sides” in Charlottesville, says “Coronavirus will just go away with the weather being warmer” (lie). Yes popular increases voter turnout, however, I feel as the expression claims, “If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.” My feeling Sophia is that popular vote determines how electoral college votes goes. However, the problem is it makes the state become red or blue based on the popular vote of the state. If we went with popular vote each state would be independent from each other and each state would become its on country. The same can be said by using the electoral college. Depending on how the entire state votes, it determines whether the state is blue or red. Comment as you see fit. Min 50 words or more

I fell by switching to popular vote our entire polling system would have to be drastically overturned. This could eventually create a world of chaos involving many changes in our protocols for voting and our nation’s process of determining who wins the election.
Small states are known to receive better representation within the electoral college. Understanding popular voting, would allow the power to the big populated states almost entirely. If the presidential election was based upon popular vote, everyone would have an equal chance to express their vote whether they live in a small state or not, and it would not change their voting power and it would not hurt the small states. The Electoral College today is outdated. The public owes it to themselves to become informed and let their votes make a difference, and replacing the Electoral College with the popular vote is the best way to do so. Comment as you see fit. Min 50 words or more

Write fluently and concisely, ensuring the accuracy of the spelling,
punctuation, syntax and grammar.
Write in continuous prose which is logically structured and well presented.
Use recognised sources and reference your work fully and accurately
Word Count approx. 2500 (10% leeway) – excluding referencing.
You must analyse the application of pedagogical principles and learning
preferences in own area of specialism. This will require comparisons a variety
of teaching methods.
You will then be able to explain ways in which theories, principles and models
of learning can be applied to teaching, learning and assessment.
Finally; evaluate the effectiveness of use of creative and innovative approaches
in own area of specialism
Attachments:
5528245_1_DET-Level-5-Assignment-1-Brief.pdf
5528245_2_DET-Level-5-Assignment-1.pdf

Directions: Be sure to make an electronic copy of your answer before submitting it to Ashworth College for grading. Unless otherwise stated, answer in complete sentences, and be sure to use correct English spelling and grammar. Sources must be cited in APA format. Your response should be four (4) pages in length; refer to the “Assignment Format” page for specific format requirements.
In your course, turn to Lesson 8. Skim through it to refresh your memory. Next, carefully study and review the section titled “Approaches to Measuring Technological Progress.”
Use your own words to write a short compare-and-contrast essay that defines and explains three distinct perspectives on the evolution of technology. As you write, imagine you are talking to a friend who has no knowledge of this topic. In short, write the way you speak, using a conversational tone. Also, try to alternate short sentences and longer sentences to make your writing more readable.
Be sure to create a title and cite yourself as the author. For example:
A Comparison of Three Perspectives on the Evolution of Technology
Mei Quoran
Your essay should include five paragraphs, as follows:
Paragraph 1 is your lead paragraph. It will contain an overview of what you have to say in comparing and contrasting the perspectives of Gerhard Lenski, Leslie White, and Alvin Toffler with respect to the evolution of technology.
Paragraphs 2, 3, and 4 are your body paragraphs.
In your essay, use paragraph 2 to describe the perspective of Gerhard Lenski.
In paragraph 3, you’ll write about the perspective of Leslie White.
In paragraph 4, you’ll describe and discuss the perspective of Alvin Toffler.
Paragraph 5 is your summary and conclusion. Here, you’ll compare the three perspectives to show how they are, or may be, similar. You’ll contrast the three perspectives to describe how they’re different. You’ll end this process—and your essay—by expressing your view as to which of these theorists (one or more) offer the most useful insights into the evolution of technology, in your opinion.
It’s permissible to use direct quotes from your reading, but don’t use too many. One to three such quotes should be your limit. Be sure to put a direct quote in quotation marks. For example: According to Smith, “Carbon dioxide is both our friend and our enemy.”
Begin by writing a first draft. Then, edit and rework your material to make it clear and concise. After you have reached a final draft, proofread the essay one last time to locate and correct grammar and spelling errors.
Attachments:
5528257_1_E5C1521B-6B84-4C3F-901C-123BD3DBE145.png
5528257_2_71BC1A19-D234-4A15-8212-0636A217DE0D.png
5528257_3_4954F266-DA26-4EB7-9883-32489B7040B5.png
5528257_4_8A542BE6-88CA-44ED-B742-8313DB595319.png
5528257_5_4B7CDF15-5958-471B-AF3E-74CC29C7660C.png