Tag: Capstone

Professional psychologists must understand the concepts of reliability and validity in terms of testing and be able to adequately respond when tests are considered unreliable or invalid. This assignment requires that you analyze research regarding reliability and validity of testing instruments and write a paper including a related annotated bibliography.
General Requirements:
Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:
This assignment uses a grading rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
Refer to the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association for specific guidelines related to doctoral level writing. The Manual contains essential information on manuscript structure and content, clear and concise writing, and academic grammar and usage.
This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included.
Directions:
Write a paper (1,000-1,250 words) that describes the importance of reliability and validity with regard to testing instruments. Include the following in your paper:
1.A discussion in support of the importance of using tests that have high levels of reliability and validity,
2.A discussion of the ramifications of using tests that do not meet these criteria.
3.Synthesis of source information is present and scholarly. Argument is clear and convincing presenting a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. The synthesis and argument in the paper are of publication caliber.
4.Thesis and/or main claim are clear and comprehensive; the essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. The development indicated by the thesis and/or main claim is acceptable for publication.
5.The document is correctly formatted to publication standards. All research presented is scholarly, topic-related, and obtained from highly respected, professional, original sources. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. The paper could readily be accepted for publication.

Demonstrate industry research skills in delivering feasible work-based projects. b. Work efficiently and effectively to complete project-based work integrated learning. c. Critically apply theoretical and practical skills relevant to working in the professional planning environment, including team work. d. Critically reflect on contemporary practice and trends in a course related industry to inform your future practice. e. Effectively communicate ideas using diverse formats and strategies to academic and professional audiences within and external to the discipline of your course. f. Work with others in a range of roles and contexts, demonstrating cultural and social sensitivity, environmental stewardship and ethical and reflective practice to deliver a work based project.
Attachments:
5554482_1_MA618-Group-final-report.pdf

Write an additional 2,000-2,250 words using the data in the “Interpreting Test Results” resource to create a set of reports in which you interpret the test results and make recommendations about each of the three fictional clients tested. Your reports should be developed for delivery to the leader in each of the respective settings. This section should flow naturally from the revised paper. So, you may also need to revise your introduction and thesis statement to allow the ideas to connect. Each report should include the following:
1.A synopsis of the reliability and validity of the test administered.
2. Private notes that describe your thought process for analyzing and drawing conclusions from the test data and the client’s situation. Note: This section represents your private notes and may be presented as a bulleted list.
3. Recommendations for the leader in which you provide an overview of the client and situation, describe your conclusions, and make your formal recommendations. Note: This is a more formal statement and should exhibit a professional tone and writing style.
Attachments:
5569785_1_Interpreting-Test-Result.docx

You are required to implement a Python module that contains functions that manipulate lists. Please ensure that you read sections titled ‘Part I specification’ below for further details. Part II: Manage character (hero and villain) information You are required to write a Python program that will manage character (heroes and villain) information. Character (hero and villain) information will be stored in a text file that will be read in when the program commences. Once the initial character (hero and villain) information has been read in from the file, the program should allow the user to interactively query and manipulate the character (hero and villain) information. Please ensure that you read sections titled ‘Part II specification’ below for further details
Attachments:
5597999_1_psp-assignment-partii-sp5-2020.pdf

HURRICANE KATRINAWhat responsibility do engineers have for the failure of the levee system in New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina?

MUST BE ASSIGNED TO M. JOHAR
Write a paper (750-1,000 words) in which you present a clearly articulated argument for whether a qualitative or quantitative research methodology is the best approach to answer the potential dissertation research questions and address the problem statement you drafted in a previous course. Include the following in your paper:
A literature-supported discussion identifying the critical attributes of the selected methodology (qualitative or quantitative).
A literature-supported rationale that clearly articulates why the critical attributes of the selected methodology are a best or appropriate fit for the stated problem and research questions. Cite specific examples where a similar methodology was used to answer similar research questions or to address a similar problem statement.
A literature-supported rationale that clearly articulates why the opposing methodology (qualitative or quantitative) is not appropriate for the study.
A concluding statement that clearly affirms the methodological choice (qualitative of quantitative).

For Assessment 2: you are required to write an essay of 1500 words on the following topic.
“Discuss the significance of recovery principles in the provision of care for individuals with mental health problems”.

I have an assignment to do by Sunday, December 20,2020 at 5:00 p.m. cst. I have already done paper
Unit 3 – Individual Project
View
Assignment Details for Unit 3 – Individual Project
as PDF
Assignment Overview
Type:
Individual Project
Unit:
Effective Design
Due Date:
Tue,12/22/20
Grading Type:
Numeric
Points Possible:
100
Points Earned:
Points Earned
not available
Deliverable Length:
5-7 pages
View objectives for this assignment
Go To:
Assignment Details
Learning Materials
Reading Assignment
My Work:
Attachments:
5728745_1_Unit-3—Designing-for-Computer-Mediated-Learning–Individual-Project-.docx
5728745_2_Unit-3–Effective-Design–Designing-for-Computer-Mediated-Learning–2-.docx

THIS IS A REDO ASSIGNMENT THAT MUST BE ASSIGNED TO M.JOHAR
Part 1
Present a revised version (1,750-2,050 words total) of the paper “Predictive Patterns of Behavior” that makes improvements in the caliber of the writing and incorporates instructor feedback regarding content and writing. Include the following in your submission:
A reflection (250-300 words) that provides a bulleted list of the changes you made to the paper and discusses your revision process including how you incorporated your instructor’s feedback into the revised version. Similar to an abstract, this section will receive its own page following the title page and preceding the introduction to the paper.
The revised paper that incorporates instructor feedback; clarifies the thesis statement and solidifies supporting arguments; edits for grammar, spelling, and punctuation; adjusts word choice to display professional and scholarly language; and adjusts sentence structure for improved readability.
Part 2
Write an additional 1,500-1,750 words that discusses the interactions that influence cognitive comprehension. This section should flow naturally from the revised paper. So, you may also need to revise your introduction and thesis statement to allow the ideas to connect. Address the following in the paper:
Describe the interactions that influence cognitive comprehension. Consider the connection of predictive patterns of behavior and social cognitive theory to cognitive comprehension.
Explain how these interactions work well together.
Describe what happens when these interactions conflict with one another.
Attachments:
5744780_1_Predictive-Patterns-of-Behavior–23-with-feedback–1-.docx
5744780_2_Rubric-Print-Format.xlsx

Consider this C Program, C++ Program, Java Program or C# Program. It reads integers from the standard input (until it gets a negative number) and puts them into an array. After that it calls
processArray
on the array, and then prints the value that is returned to standard output.
Currently
processArray
does nothing and simply returns 0. You have to modify it so that it finds the highest odd number in the array and prints that to the standard output. It should return 0 if the array has no odd numbers.
For example, if these numbers were provided on the standard input:
2 5 3 8 -1

When your program is run, it should output
5
(and nothing else).