Tag: Clinical-Nursing

  • DN713: Epidemiology and Social Determinants of Population Health

    DN713: Epidemiology and Social Determinants of Population Health

    ORDER A CUSTOM-WRITTEN, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW

    This course focuses on comprehending, synthesizing, and applying emerging scientific knowledge specific to clinical prevention and population health. You will synthesize trends among epidemiologic, biostatistical, and environmental data to derive solutions to tenacious or new health care problems based on existing health data sets and the scientific literature. Social determinants of health in the processes of conducting risk assessment, intervention development and implementation, health care delivery planning, and evaluation will be considered. Models of clinical prevention and population health care delivery will be evaluated. This course requires 20 supervised practice hours focused on population health. DN713: Epidemiology and Social Determinants of Population Health

    Quarter Credit Hours: 5 | Prerequisite: None | Corequisite:
     DN703

  • Worldview Analysis and Personal Inventory essay example

    Worldview Analysis and Personal Inventory essay example

    Based on the required topic study materials, write a reflection about worldview and respond to following:

    In 250-300 words, explain the Christian perspective of the nature of spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspective of postmodern relativism within health care.

    In 250-300 words, explain what scientism is and describe two of the main arguments against it.

    In 750-1,000 words, answer each of the worldview questions according to your own personal perspective and worldview: (a) What is ultimate reality? (b) What is the nature of the universe? (c) What is a human being? (d) What is knowledge? (e) What is your basis of ethics? (f) What is the purpose of your existence?

    Remember to support your reflection with the topic study materials. Worldview Analysis and Personal Inventory essay example.

    ORDER A CUSTOM-WRITTEN, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW

    While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

    This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. Worldview Analysis and Personal Inventory essay example.

    Worldview analysis and personal inventory

    Part 1.

    Christians view spirituality as the prism of religion and theology in which an all-powerful God exists that has control over everything. In fact, the spirituality is a reflection of the Christian quest for purpose, meaning and truth in life, seeking to introduce a transcendental perspective to the human experience. This implies that spirituality serves both a symbolic and theological function. In addition, Christians view ethics as conformity with the dictates of spirituality especially when there is no ambiguity over expectations. The Christian perspective of spirituality and ethics has implications for health care through evaluating it as practiced ethics since it seeks to lessen human suffering from disease with restoring and augmenting wellbeing (Igboin, 2015). Worldview Analysis and Personal Inventory essay example.

    Postmodern relativism is based on the notion that there is no absolute truth. It acknowledges that although there are those who subscribe to spirituality and believe that human life has transcendental implications, it would be wrong to disparage the belief that human life does not have transcendental implications. In essence, postmodern relativism accepts that all contrasting ideas are equally valid and should not be discarded simply because they are contradictory. Concerning ethics, postmodern relativism considers it as a truth that changes based on the circumstances. That is because what is unethical for one group will similarly be unethical for another group. This has implication for health care since it forces medical personnel to be more cognizant of what the patients want. For instance, medical personnel could consider assisted suicide as ethically right, particularly in palliative care, while a group of patients could consider it as unethical (Zavada, 2019). Worldview Analysis and Personal Inventory essay example.

    Part 2.

    Scientism is the view that hard sciences that can provide factual and testable data that can be replicated (such as astronomy, physics, biology and chemistry) are the only source of genuine and true knowledge about reality. In fact, it notes that although soft sciences offers some knowledge about reality, only hard sciences can offer superior knowledge. That is because hard science is based on falsification, experimentation and skepticism in the search for basic explanatory principles about world reality. In addition, soft sciences (such as religion, ethics and philosophy) are only partially acceptable on the basis of their inherent subjective nature and are considered as private issues of personal opinion. This implies that any claims that accept knowledge from soft sciences as factual scientific truth is an indication of intolerance and bigotry. Overall, scientism advances the notion that only hard sciences have the intellectual authority to provide real knowledge (Moreland, 2018).

    Although scientism appears valid, there are two arguments that invalidate the notion. Firstly, any reality presented by hard science is simply a propositional truth that is provisional and is likely to change as scientific approaches become more advanced. To be more precise, hard sciences apply methodological approaches that only offers a perspective of reality, and is not a catalog of irrefutable facts or inflexible principles. Similar to the way hard sciences is disputable, is the same way in which soft science is disputable and adapts to newly presented evidence. Secondly, scientism is tyrannical since it promotes a dangerous brand of bloodless rationalism that disregards soft science although they are important for hard science. For instance, it disregards noble human endeavors such as literature, painting and music that are thought provoking through willfully denying or ignoring conclusions from hard sciences (Briggs, 2019).

    Part 3.

    (a) What is ultimate reality?

    The ultimate reality is that humans are the product of interactions with the environment to include the neighborhood, education, parents, government, media, and so on. Through interaction with the environment, every individual is subtly influenced and shaped to comprehend how and why they exist. For instance, it is not surprising for an individual to ascribe to the religion that his or her parents ascribe to. Overall, the ultimate reality is only limited by experience and reason, which can influence the capacity to adequately understand and truly grasp the nature of human existence. Worldview Analysis and Personal Inventory essay example.

    (b) What is the nature of the universe?

    The universe is a static existence that is subject to constant change through the process of evolution, competition, and energy conversion. Firstly, the universe experiences evolution through adaptability and selection where only the most suitable biological entities that can outcompete other biological entities are able to survive even as they acquire the limited available resources. Secondly, competition is an inherent occurrence that determines who gets the best or worst resources. Finally, the universe is reliant on energy conversion in a well-structured system with the sun being the main source of energy that powers all other activities to include life and gravitational rotation of the earth.

    (c) What is a human being?

    A human being is a biological entity characterized through biological speciation and the capacity for higher thinking. Firstly, they are characterized through biological speciation with every human being identified as
    Homo sapiens
    . The speciation is validated by DNA profile similarities that indicated biological capacity to reproduce. Secondly, they have a capacity for higher thinking that allows them to adapt the environment to their needs through developing better food, clothing and machines as well as controlling all other animals. Worldview Analysis and Personal Inventory essay example.

    (d) What is knowledge?

    Knowledge refers to the set of skills, information and facts that are acquired through experience (practical) and education (theoretical that can be from formal or informal processes). Through acquiring knowledge, individuals gain an awareness and familiarity with different situations. In fact, it consists of recognizing differential awareness whose limitations are defined through awareness. Worldview Analysis and Personal Inventory essay example. For instance, all nurses have knowledge of nursing concepts, but the depth of knowledge will differ based on experience and level of education that determine awareness limitations of the different nursing concepts.

    (e) What is your basis of ethics?

    There are two basis of ethics. The first basis of ethics is the personal perspective that is reliant on what I consider right and wrong based on my beliefs through interacting with the environment, such as what my religion, culture, community, and family believe in Worldview Analysis and Personal Inventory essay example. The second basis of ethics is the public perspective that is based on public beliefs expressed through principles such as confidentiality principles that protect personal information. The personal and public perspectives all determine how I approach ethics with the public perspective taking precedence when the two perspectives are in conflict.

    (f) What is the purpose of your existence?

    The purpose of my existence is to live to my full potential, improve the world, and leave this world not worse than I found it so that my future generations are not placed at a disadvantage. I can live to my full potential through acquiring competent professional skills and applying this skills in earning a living. I can improve the world by having an analytical mind that notices the problems around me and proposing solutions to these problems. I can leave the world not worse that I found it through being cognizant of the impact of all my actions on eth environment and ensuring that I do not contribute to environmental degradation. Worldview Analysis and Personal Inventory essay example.

    References

    Briggs, W. (2019).
    In opposition to scientism
    . Retrieved from https://wmbriggs.com/post/26885/

    Igboin, B. (2015). Spirituality and medical practice: a Christian perspective.
    Indian Journal of Medical Ethics
    , 12(4). doi: 10.20529/IJME.2015.054. Retrieved from http://ijme.in/articles/spirituality-and-medical-practice-a-christian-perspective/?galley=html

    Moreland, J. (2018).
    What is scientism?
    Retrieved from https://www.crossway.org/articles/what-is-scientism/

    Zavada, J. (2019).
    Postmodernism definition
    . Retrieved from https://www.learnreligions.com/what-is-postmodernism-700692 Worldview Analysis and Personal Inventory essay example

  • DN703: Scientific Foundations for Practice Doctorate

    DN703: Scientific Foundations for Practice Doctorate

    ORDER A CUSTOM-WRITTEN, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW

    In this course, you will examine the evolution of nursing science and the emergence of the DNP degree based on the utilization of evidence to influence the health of populations. You will be introduced to advanced levels of systems thinking with a focus on designing programs to improve patient, population, and health system outcomes based on levels of evidence available. You will appraise new practice approaches based on theories from nursing and other disciplines. During this course, you will analyze a health care problem or relevant clinical inquiry for the DNP project and identify the population focus for the DNP project. This course requires 50 supervised practice hours, which may be applied to the doctoral project. DN703: Scientific Foundations for Practice Doctorate

    Quarter Credit Hours: 5 | Prerequisite: None

  • Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Sample

    Prepare this Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Sample assignment as a 1,500-1,750 word paper using the instructor feedback from the previous course assignments and the guidelines below.

    PICOT Question

    Revise the PICOT question you wrote in the Topic 1 assignment using the feedback you received from your instructor.

    The final PICOT question will provide a framework for your capstone project (the project students must complete during their final course in the RN-BSN program of study). Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Sample.

    ORDER A CUSTOM-WRITTEN, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW

    Research Critiques

    In the Topic 2 and Topic 3 assignments, you completed a qualitative and quantitative research critique on two articles for each type of study (4 articles total). Use the feedback you received from your instructor on these assignments to finalize the critical analysis of each study by making appropriate revisions.

    The completed analysis should connect to your identified practice problem of interest that is the basis for your PICOT question.

    Refer to ”Research Critiques and PICOT Guidelines – Final Draft.” Questions under each heading should be addressed as a narrative in the structure of a formal paper.

    Proposed Evidence-Based Practice Change

    Discuss the link between the PICOT question, the research articles, and the nursing practice problem you identified. Include relevant details and supporting explanation and use that information to propose evidence-based practice changes.

     

    Research Critique Guidelines

    Qualitative Study

    Background of Study:

    Identify the clinical problem and research problem that led to the study. What was not known about the clinical problem that, if understood, could be used to improve health care delivery or patient outcomes? This gap in knowledge is the research problem.

    How did the author establish the significance of the study? In other words, why should the reader care about this study? Look for statements about human suffering, costs of treatment, or the number of people affected by the clinical problem. Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Sample.

    Identify the purpose of the study. An author may clearly state the purpose of the study or may describe the purpose as the study goals, objectives, or aims.

    List research questions that the study was designed to answer. If the author does not explicitly provide the questions, attempt to infer the questions from the answers.

    Were the purpose and research questions related to the problem?

    Method of Study:

    Were qualitative methods appropriate to answer the research questions?

    Did the author identify a specific perspective from which the study was developed? If so, what was it?

    Did the author cite quantitative and qualitative studies relevant to the focus of the study? What other types of literature did the author include?

    Are the references current? For qualitative studies, the author may have included studies older than the 5-year limit typically used for quantitative studies. Findings of older qualitative studies may be relevant to a qualitative study.

    Did the author evaluate or indicate the weaknesses of the available studies?

    Did the literature review include adequate information to build a logical argument?

    When a researcher uses the grounded theory method of qualitative inquiry, the researcher may develop a framework or diagram as part of the findings of the study. Was a framework developed from the study findings? Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Sample
     

    Results of Study

    What were the study findings?

    What are the implications to nursing?

    Explain how the findings contribute to nursing knowledge/science. Would this impact practice, education, administration, or all areas of nursing?

    Ethical Considerations

    Was the study approved by an Institutional Review Board?

    Was patient privacy protected?

    Were there ethical considerations regarding the treatment or lack of?

    Conclusion

    Emphasize the importance and congruity of the thesis statement.

    Provide a logical wrap-up to bring the appraisal to completion and to leave a lasting impression and take-away points useful in nursing practice.

    Incorporate a critical appraisal and a brief analysis of the utility and applicability of the findings to nursing practice.

    Integrate a summary of the knowledge learned. Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Sample.
     

     

    Quantitative Study

    Background of Study:

    Identify the clinical problem and research problem that led to the study. What was not known about the clinical problem that, if understood, could be used to improve health care delivery or patient outcomes? This gap in knowledge is the research problem.

    How did the author establish the significance of the study? In other words, why should the reader care about this study? Look for statements about human suffering, costs of treatment, or the number of people affected by the clinical problem. Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Sample.

    Identify the purpose of the study. An author may clearly state the purpose of the study or may describe the purpose as the study goals, objectives, or aims.

    List research questions that the study was designed to answer. If the author does not explicitly provide the questions, attempt to infer the questions from the answers.

    Were the purpose and research questions related to the problem? Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Sample.

     Methods of Study

    Identify the benefits and risks of participation addressed by the authors. Were there benefits or risks the authors do not identify?

    Was informed consent obtained from the subjects or participants?

    Did it seem that the subjects participated voluntarily in the study?

    Was institutional review board approval obtained from the agency in which the study was conducted?

    Are the major variables (independent and dependent variables) identified and defined? What were these variables? Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Sample.

    How were data collected in this study?

    What rationale did the author provide for using this data collection method?

    Identify the time period for data collection of the study.

    Describe the sequence of data collection events for a participant.

    Describe the data management and analysis methods used in the study.

    Did the author discuss how the rigor of the process was assured? For example, does the author describe maintaining a paper trail of critical decisions that were made during the analysis of the data? Was statistical software used to ensure accuracy of the analysis? Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Sample.

    What measures were used to minimize the effects of researcher bias (their experiences and perspectives)? For example, did two researchers independently analyze the data and compare their analyses?

    Results of Study

    What is the researcher’s interpretation of findings?

    Are the findings valid or an accurate reflection of reality? Do you have confidence in the findings?

    What limitations of the study were identified by researchers?

    Was there a coherent logic to the presentation of findings?

    What implications do the findings have for nursing practice? For example, can the findings of the study be applied to general nursing practice, to a specific population, or to a specific area of nursing?

    What suggestions are made for further studies? Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Sample.

    Ethical Considerations

    Was the study approved by an Institutional Review Board?

    Was patient privacy protected?

    Were there ethical considerations regarding the treatment or lack of?

    Conclusion

    Emphasize the importance and congruity of the thesis statement.

    Provide a logical wrap-up to bring the appraisal to completion and to leave a lasting impression and take-away points useful in nursing practice.

    Incorporate a critical appraisal and a brief analysis of the utility and applicability of the findings to nursing practice.

    Integrate a summary of the knowledge learned. Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Sample.

    Reference

    Burns, N., & Grove, S. (2011).
    Understanding nursing research
    (5th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier. Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft Sample.

  • Chronic Care Management Essay

    Chronic Care Management Essay

    After an initial examination of the medication list, I try to envision Mrs. X based on the SPICES assessment and my own 30 years of geriatric experience.  This is an 80-year-old female who has lived her entire life eating rich foods high in cholesterol and fat.  She is probably short and plump.  She has not been sleeping and likely exhibits physical behaviors which have been labeled as “psychotic” in nature.  She hasn’t been eating well and has had a significant weight loss, despite her plump appearance.  She has tremors in her hands which make it hard to hold utensils and cups, but she has lost weight because she has had anorexia, not due to the tremors.  She is incontinent and has constipation.  She is confused, usually agitated, and she probably cries inappropriately.  She is ambulatory, but she is weak. She will have some bruises and skin tears on her arms and legs due to the falls, but she doesn’t have any pressure wounds, yet. Chronic Care Management Essay.

    ORDER A CUSTOM-WRITTEN, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW

    Although Mrs. X is very ill, there is no question that some of her current ailments are related to her polypharmacy.  There are 21 medications on Mrs. X’s medication list.  Unfortunately, the use of more than five medications daily (polypharmacy) is commonly seen in elderly patients (Masnoon, Shakib, Kalisch-Elliot, & Caughey, 2017).  At first glance, it is notable that many of the medications on Mrs. X’s list work in similar ways and place Mrs. X at higher risk for side effects or adverse reactions.  Also, some of these medications have the same ingredients as others, increasing the risk of overdose. Chronic Care Management Essay Some of the listed medications are even contraindicated for elderly patients (Maher, Hanton, & Hajjar, 2014).

    A plan of care is needed that should include medication reconciliation, education regarding her medications, review by a pharmacy consultant, and initiation of gradual dose reductions.  Medication education should include a description of the each medication currently taken.  Altace is an ACE (angiotensin-converting-enzyme) inhibitor and is used to treat high blood pressure (Hypertension) and heart failure (Wolters, 2011).  Adalat is a calcium channel blocker and is used to treat high blood pressure (Wolters, 2011).  Cardizem LA is also a calcium channel blocker and is used to treat high blood pressure (Wolters, 2011). Chronic Care Management Essay Lasix is a diuretic used to treat fluid retention caused by heart failure (Wolters, 2011).  Hydrochlorothiazide is also a diuretic and is used to treat fluid retention and hypertension (Wolters, 2011).  Baby aspirin is a blood thinner, as well as a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory, and is used to reduce the risk of heart attack by thinning the blood (Wolters, 2011).  Lipitor is a statin drug and is used to treat high cholesterol and triglyceride levels (Wolters, 2011).  Synthroid is a hormone used to treat hypothyroidism (Wolters, 2011).  Tylenol is an analgesic used to treat minor aches and pains (Wolters, 2011).  Benadryl is an antihistamine with a sedating effect that is used to treat seasonal allergies (Wolters, 2011).  Aleve is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug used to treat arthritis pain (Wolters, 2011).  Amrix is a muscle relaxant used to treat pain and stiffness caused by muscle spasms (Wolters, 2011). Chronic Care Management Essay Glucosamine is an amino sugar and is used to treat arthritis pain.  Amitriptyline is an antidepressant and is used to treat sleeplessness associated with depression (Wolters, 2011).  Paxil is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor and is used to treat depression (Wolters, 2011).  Oxazepam is a sedative and is used to treat insomnia associated with depression (Wolters, 2011).  Tylenol PM is a combination drug that contains both Benadryl and Tylenol.  Prilosec is a proton pump inhibitor used to treat gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (Wolters, 2011).  Fiber laxative is a bulk-forming laxative used to treat constipation by increasing the bulk of the stool causing movement in the intestine.  It also increases the amount of water in the stool making the stool softer (Wolters, 2011).  Colace is a sulfonic acid which is also used to increase the amount of water in the stool making it softer and easier to pass (Wolters, 2011).  Multivitamins are prepared with multiple dietary minerals and nutritional elements and are used as dietary supplements and often stimulate the appetite. Chronic Care Management Essay.

    Independently medications such as Benadryl, Paxil, Tylenol PM, and others are contraindicated for use in the elderly because they have adverse side effects such as increased delirium, behavioral problems, and increased risk for stroke.  Medications such as Prilosec can cause bone loss, fractures and even bowel infections such as Clostridium Difficile.  Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications such as Aleve and baby aspirin could potentially promote fluid retention and exacerbate heart failure. Chronic Care Management Essay In addition to the side-effects/ adverse reactions that some medications can cause, there is also the potential for medications that work in a similar manner to increase other risks (Beers, 2015).  Antidepressant medications can lower blood pressure and if a patient also receives a fluid pill (diuretic), then this adds to the potential for extremely low blood pressure, which could cause falls or even be fatal.  Muscle relaxants and sedatives both cause increased sleepiness and are poorly tolerated by older adults.  Over-sedation and falls are a huge risk.  Even though CHF causes an excess of fluid, there is still a very real risk of dehydration (Haq, et.al., 2014).  Lasix, hydrochlorothiazide, bulk fiber laxative, and Colace all pull fluid out of the body for elimination either by urine or feces. A person can have edema when fluid is in all the wrong places, but still be dehydrated because the fluid is not in the right places (Haq, et.al., 2014).

    It is important that medications are taken strictly as ordered and unnecessary medications should be discontinued (Masnoon, et.al., 2017).  Although there may be some adjustment with medication timing to meet a patient’s individual preferences, it is important that the medication regimen have a structured routine.  A pharmacist should be consulted to review medications monthly or as indicated to ensure that the lowest possible therapeutic dosages are given.  Laboratory monitoring will be critical in assessment of the status of medication levels and their effects on the body.  Other tests may also be needed such as an electrocardiogram, chest x-ray, or arterial doppler studies.  Physical, occupational, and speech therapies – as well as restorative nursing – will be needed to improve physical tolerance and endurance.  Nutrition will also be important.  Calorie intake, salt intake, and other vitamins and minerals will need to be monitored closely.  Daily weights and edema checks will be needed to monitor fluid gains and/ or losses (Haq, et.al., 2014).  Involvement in activities of daily living, social activities, and therapy activities, as well as a regular waking and sleeping routine, will be necessary to improve sleep patterns.  One of the more important interventions needed is the monitoring frequently for adverse reactions, side effects, and/or increased behaviors.  Regular assessments will be needed. Chronic Care Management Essay.

    References

    Masnoon, N., Shakib, S., Kalisch-Ellett, L., & Caughey, G.  (2017, October 10).  What is polypharmacy? A systematic review of definitions. 
    Biomed central geriatrics, 17
    , 230.  Retrieved from 
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5635569/

    Wolters K. (Firm).  (2011).
    Nursing 2011 drug handbook
    .  Philedephia – Baltimore – New York – London.  Chris Burghardt Chronic Care Management Essay

    Beers Criteria Update Expert Panel.  (2015). American geriatrics society 2015 updated Beers criteria for potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults. 
    Clinical Investigations.
      Retrieved from 
    https://www.sigot.org/allegato_docs/1057_Beers-Criteria.pdf

    Maher, Jr, R., Hanlon, J., Hajjar, E.  (2014). Clinical consequences of polypharmacy in elderly. 
    Expert opin drug saf.
      Retrieved from 
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3864987/

    Haq, M., Wong, C., Mutha, V., Anavekar, N., Lim, K., Barlis, P., & Hare, D.  (2014). Therapeutic interventions for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction:  A summary of current evidence. 
    World journal of cardiology, 6
    (2), 67-76.  Doi:  10.4330/wjc.v6.i2.67 Chronic Care Management Essay

  • Generalizability in nursing research – Sampling theory

    Generalizability in nursing research – Sampling theory

    Sampling theory

    Sampling theory refers to the structured study of the unique relationship that exists a random sample drawn from a population and the population. It is important to note that the theory only applies to random samples since it assumes that the whole population is an aggregation of individual members who have aggregated common trait(s). The theory is of relevance to nursing research because it addresses the logistical, time and financial concerns associated with sampling the whole population. Generalizability in nursing research – Sampling theory. Through identifying a random sample, the research is able to access the traits that are unique to the population and in proportions that are representative of the population. Generalizability in nursing research – Sampling theory. In addition, the theory acknowledges that a larger number of samples offers a truer representation of the whole population since this allows the research to access more traits that acknowledge the diversity existing in the population. Overall, the theory acknowledges that a research can access part of a population to draw conclusions about the whole population with regards to statistical estimation, hypothesis tests, and statistical inference (Goos & Meintrup, 2016). Generalizability in nursing research – Sampling theory.

    ORDER A CUSTOM-WRITTEN, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW

    Generalizability is an important concept in nursing research. It refers to the extension of the research conclusion and findings from the study conducted on a sample of the population to the whole population. Although the dependability of generalizing research results is not absolute with regards to extending the results to the whole population, the statistical results offer some element of probability. Given that generalizability is based on data to determine probability, then it is not hard to accept that data from large populations offer the best foundation for producing broad generalizability Generalizability in nursing research – Sampling theory. The implication is that larger samples offer more generalizable results. For instance, a comprehensive study of the effects of a new drug would produce more generalizable results if larger samples are used. Overall, generalizability is concerned with transferring the research findings from a sample to the whole population (Rowe, 2015). Generalizability in nursing research – Sampling theory.

    References

    Goos, P. & Meintrup, D. (2016).
    Statistics with JMP: Hypothesis Tests, ANOVA and Regression
    . Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

    Rowe, P. (2015).
    Essential statistics for the pharmaceutical sciences
    . Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. Generalizability in nursing research – Sampling theory.

  • Critique and Ethical Considerations Essay Example

    Critique and Ethical Considerations Essay Example

    Write a critical appraisal that demonstrates comprehension of two qualitative research studies. Use the ”Research Critique Guidelines – Part 1” document to organize your essay. Successful completion of this assignment requires that you provide rationale, include examples, and reference content from the studies in your responses.

    Use the practice problem and two qualitative, peer-reviewed research article you identified in the Topic 1 assignment to complete this assignment. Critique and Ethical Considerations Essay Example.

    ORDER A CUSTOM-WRITTEN, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW

    In a 1,000–1,250 word essay, summarize two qualitative studies, explain the ways in which the findings might be used in nursing practice, and address ethical considerations associated with the conduct of the study.

    Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

    This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

    You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

     

    Literature Evaluation Table

    Student Name:

    Summary of Clinical Issue (200-250 words):

    When used improperly, pain medicines can cause problems in the body, including the kidneys. According to the National Kidney Foundation, as many as 3 percent to 5 percent of new cases of chronic kidney failure each year may be caused by the overuse of these painkillers. Once kidney disease occurs, continued use of the problem drug makes it worse.

    Acetaminophen It is often effective for mild to moderate pain. Its safety depends on how it is used. People who take too much or take it too often risk side effects or worse. Acetaminophen is also found in combination with other ingredients in many cold, sinus, and cough medications. Critique and Ethical Considerations Essay Example. If you take these drugs together, the dose can add up. Ibuprofen and other NSAIDs block prostaglandins, natural body chemicals that normally dilate blood vessels leading to the kidneys. Blocking prostaglandins may lead to decreased blood flow to the kidneys, which means a lack of oxygen to keep the kidneys alive. That can cause acute kidney injury. A simple blood test may show a rise in creatinine if your kidneys are being affected, usually seen within the first three to seven days of NSAID therapy. In people with high blood pressure, taking NSAIDs long-term may worsen underlying high blood pressure. Also, people with existing kidney problems more often get in trouble with NSAIDs.

     
    PICOT Question: In patients with normal renal function who have had recent surgery are nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) associated with adverse renal effects?

     

    Criteria

    Article 1

    Article 2

    Article 3

    APA-Formatted Article Citation with Permalink

    Bloom, L., Boyle, K. E., Myers, A. E., Blacketer, C., & Weinstein, R. (2019). Frequency of nonaspirin NSAID-relevant coexisting medical conditions in the primary-care setting: A retrospective database review. 
    Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management,Volume 15
    , 579-588. doi:10.2147/tcrm.s189833

     

     

    Lai, K. M., Chen, T., Chang, C., Chen, H., & Lee, Y. (2019). Association between NSAID use and mortality risk in patients with end-stage renal disease: A population-based cohort study. 
    Clinical Epidemiology,Volume 11
    , 429-441. doi:10.2147/clep.s204322

    Critique and Ethical Considerations Essay Example

    Gawande, A., Gupta, G. K., Gupta, A., Wanjari, S. J., Goel, V., Rathore, V., . . . Nijhawan, S. (2019). Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure: Etiology of Chronic and Acute Precipitating Factors and Their Effect on Mortality. 
    Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hepatology
    . doi:10.1016/j.jceh.2019.04.050

     

    How Does the Article Relate to the PICOT Question?

    It researches on use of NSAID with coexisting conditions.

    It researches the use of NSAID and mortality rates with CKD patients

    Prevalence of acute on chronic liver failure, underlying etiology and precipitating factors.

     

    Quantitative, Qualitative (How do you know?)

    Qualitative

    Qualitative

    Quantitative

    Purpose Statement

    To find the effects of NSAID with coexisting conditions.

     investigate the association between the use of NSAIDs and the risk of mortality in patients with end-stage renal disease.

     

    Research Question

    Frequency of non-aspirin NSAID-relevant coexisting medical conditions in the primary-care setting

     

    Association between NSAID use and mortality risk in patients with end-stage renal disease: a population-based cohort study

     

    Estimating the prevalence of acute on chronic 
    liver failure
     in our institute, etiology of underlying chronic 
    liver
     disease, precipitating acute event and mortality rate.

     

    Outcome

    the prevalence of renal disease was low in all three databases

    In the study cohort, 2,623 (78%) patients used NSAIDs during the follow-up period. The median follow-up period was 4.0 years, during which 1,515 patients died. The results of multivariable analysis demonstrated that compared with NSAID nonuse, the use of any NSAIDs, nonselective NSAIDs, and selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors was associated with a significantly increased risk of all-cause mortality

     

    Out of 386 patients, 150 patients were admitted with acute on chronic 
    liver
    failure with a prevalence of 39%. In 41% of patients, infection was the precipitating factor for ACLF either in the form of Sepsis, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, Lower respiratory tract infection or skin, and soft tissue infections. Alcohol was the second most precipitating factor (32%), followed by upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (12%) and drugs (2%).

     

     Where did the study take place?

    USA

    Taiwan

    Rajiv Gandhi Government General Hospital

     

    Sample

    Patients aged ≥18 years in 2013 with a visit to a PCP in the same year were included in the study. Only patients with ≥1 year of enrollment prior to their first PCP visit in 2013 were included, so that medical history was available to review.

     

    A total of 3,383 patients with newly diagnosed end-stage renal disease requiring long-term dialysis between 1998 and 2012 were included in the current study, and the study outcome was evaluated until December 31, 2013.

     

    386 patients in Rajiv Gandhi Government General Hospital

     

    Method

    A retrospective database review was performed. 

     Time-dependent Cox regression models were applied to examine the association between NSAID use and mortality risk.

     

    Database review

    Key Findings of the Study

    Overall, the prevalence of renal disease was low in all three databases relative to cardiovascular and gastrointestinal bleeding risk factors. Similar percentages of women and men were diagnosed with renal disease within each database. In each database, a higher percentage of individuals with a musculoskeletal diagnosis had a CMCOI compared to the total study population

     

    The results suggest that NSAID use was associated with an increased risk of mortality in the patients with end-stage renal disease. Future randomized controlled trials are needed to validate these observational findings.

     

    Out of 386 patients, 150 patients were admitted with acute on chronic 
    liver failure
     
    with a prevalence of 39%. In 41% of patients, infection was the precipitating factor for ACLF either in the form of Sepsis, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, Lower respiratory tract infection or skin, and soft tissue infections. Alcohol was the second most precipitating factor (32%), followed by upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (12%) and drugs (2%)

     

    Recommendations of the Researcher

    The analyses reinforce the critical role HCPs can play in identifying patients with nonaspirin NSAID-relevant coexisting conditions, providing those patients with ongoing guidance on appropriate choice and use of OTC analgesics, and educating patients about the impact that aging, health status, concomitant conditions, and medicines has on selection of all medicines, including analgesics.

     

    Future randomized controlled trials are needed to validate these observational findings.

     

    A multi-centre study involving a larger number of patients are needed to know the clinical characteristics, other precipitating factors and to form a standard treatment protocol for this dynamic syndrome.

     

     

    Criteria

    Article 4

    Article 5

    Article 6

    APA-Formatted Article Citation with Permalink

    Lee, A., Cooper, M., Craig, J., Knight, J., & Keneally, J. (2004). Effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on postoperative renal function in adults with normal renal function. 
    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
    . doi:10.1002/14651858.cd002765.pub2

     

     

    Plantinga, L., Grubbs, V., Sarkar, U., Hsu, C., Hedgeman, E., Robinson, B., . . . Powe, N. (2011). Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug Use Among Persons With Chronic Kidney Disease in the United States. 
    The Annals of Family Medicine,9
    (5), 423-430. doi:10.1370/afm.1302

     

    Brown, E. A., & Davison, S. N. (2014). Pain Management in Chronic Kidney Disease. 
    Management of Chronic Kidney Disease,
    297-304. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-54637-2_22

     

    How Does the Article Relate to the PICOT Question?

    It measures NSAID relation to CKD in post op patients

    It relates to the topic due to describing the use of NSAIDS in individuals with CKD

    Discusses how to properly manage pain in people with CKD.

    Quantitative, Qualitative (How do you know?)

    Qualitative

    Qualitative

     

    Qualitative

    Purpose Statement

    The primary objective of this review was to determine the effects of NSAIDs on postoperative renal function in adults with normal preoperative renal function.

     

    Due to avoidance of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is recommended for most individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD), we sought to characterize patterns of NSAID use among persons with CKD in the United States.

     

     

    This article will focus on identifying the challenges of pain management for CKD patient undergoing surgical intervention and explores avenues to overcome these difficulties through simplifying some of the published guidelines in this field to provide optimum pain control for this patient population.

     

    Research Question

    Effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on postoperative renal function in adults with normal renal function.

    Critique and Ethical Considerations Essay Example

    Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug Use Among Persons With Chronic Kidney Disease in the United States

     

    Postoperative pain management in patients with chronic kidney disease

     

    Outcome

    Twenty-three trials (1459 patients) fulfilled the selection criteria for this review. NSAIDs reduced creatinine clearance by 16 mL/min (95%CI 5 to 28) and potassium output by 38 mmol/day (95%CI 19 to 56) on the first day after surgery compared to placebo. There was no significant difference in serum creatinine on the first day (0 umol/L, 95%CI -3 to 4) compared to placebo. No significant reduction in urine volume during the early postoperative period was found. There was no significant difference in serum creatinine in the early postoperative period between patients receiving diclofenac, ketorolac, indomethacin, ketoprofen or etodolac.

     

    Reported current use of NSAIDs was not uncommon in the US population (3.7% overall). Persons with moderate to severe CKD were slightly more likely than those with no or mild CKD to report current use of NSAIDs (
    Figure 3A
    ). The great majority of currently used NSAIDs were available over-the-counter (
    Figure 3A
    ). Among those with CKD, current NSAID use was similar among those were aware and those who were unaware of their CKD status.

    Acetaminophen is considered the safest analgesic agent in ESRD and should be used routinely as an analgesic foundation. With chronic use, however, acetaminophen itself may cause nephrotoxicity. Although some authors suggest there is no need to adjust the acetaminophen maximum daily dose in patients undergoing intermittent hemodialysis, the 4 g/day recommended maximum dose may not be applicable for the majority of patients due to the presence of other factors that increase the risk of toxicity.

     

    Setting

    (Where did the study take place?)

    N/A

    Sample

    NSAIDs with either each other or placebo for treatment of postoperative pain, with relevant postoperative renal outcome measures, in adult surgical patients with normal renal function.

     

    A total of 12,065 adult (aged 20 years or older)

     

    Method

    The inclusion criteria were randomised or quasi-randomised comparisons.

    Participants in the cross-sectional National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1999–2004) responded to a questionnaire regarding their use of over-the-counter and prescription NSAID

     

    Critique and Ethical Considerations Essay Example

    Key Findings of the Study

    NSAIDs caused a clinically unimportant transient reduction in renal function in the early postoperative period in patients with normal preoperative renal function.

    Among those with moderate to severe CKD who were currently using NSAIDs, 10.2% had a current NSAID prescription and 66.1% had used NSAIDs for 1 year or longer. Among those with CKD, disease awareness was not associated with reduced current NSAID use:

     

    Pharmacotherapy pain management strategies for patients with CKD change as kidney function becomes progressively impaired. When devising a strategy, physicians must strive to protect the kidney from further damage as well as avoid developing serious side effects due to accumulations of analgesic agents or their metabolites.

     

    Recommendations of the Researcher

    NSAIDs should not be withheld from adults with normal preoperative renal function because of concerns about postoperative renal impairment.

     

    Physicians and other health care clinicians should be aware of use of NSAIDs among those with CKD in the United States and evaluate NSAID use in their CKD patients.

     

    Further clinical studies are required to address the optimal medication regimen that can be used for postoperative pain management in the different stages of CKD, including hemodialysis.

     

     

    Critique and ethical considerations

    Article 1.

    “Bloom, L., Boyle, K. E., Myers, A. E., Blacketer, C., & Weinstein, R. (2019). Frequency of nonaspirin NSAID-relevant coexisting medical conditions in the primary-care setting: A retrospective database review.
    Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
    , 15, 579-588. doi: 10.2147/tcrm.s189833” Critique and Ethical Considerations Essay Example

    Summary

    Bloom et al. (2019) present the results of a retrospective database review to determine how coexisting medical conditions and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) influence treatment modalities as noted in primary care practices. The retrospective approach collected data from the claim databases of three medical facilities with a focus on patients either 18 years of age or older. The data was collected for the period covering 2013. The focus was on non-aspirin NSAID-relevant coexisting medical conditions of interest (CMCOI), asthma, cardiovascular risk factors, gastrointestinal bleeding risk factors, and renal insufficiency. Statistical analysis of the collected data determined that patients with musculoskeletal diagnosis reported a significantly higher risk of treatment challenges when compared to their counterparts without musculoskeletal diagnosis. Similarly, age was noted to influence treatment challenges, with an increase in age being matched by an increase in the occurrence of treatment challenges. The reported results indicate that non-aspirin NSAID-relevant CMCOI and age are useful statistical for use among primary care professionals with regards to predicting the occurrence of treatment challenges. In fact, the results show that even as patients advance in age, their medical conditions change and their reactions to different medications also change Critique and Ethical Considerations Essay Example. Using the information, primary care professionals can identify patients at high risk and offer them guidance on how their age, health status, concomitant conditions, and medication influence treatment modalities (Bloom et al., 2019).

    Using findings in nursing practice

    The findings from Bloom et al. (2019) are useful to nursing personnel who act as primary care professionals. That is because NSAIDs are a common medication that are typically prescribed or recommended for almost all medical conditions. Although commonly used, NSAIDs are associated with substantial side effects and complications for a particular demographic of patients. Despite the labels for NSAIDs listing these side effects and complications, patients and medical personnel would often overlook them thereby presenting opportunities for them to occur with potentially fatal effects. Through identifying this demographic of patients, nurses are able to anticipate the care complications and offer appropriate advice on how to either address or prevent the complications. Besides that, they can use their position as primary care professionals to reinforce the importance of the advice contains in the labels as instructions and not simply suggestions. Overall, the findings allow nursing practice to contribute towards the safe use of NSAIDs as well as improving care outcomes through anticipating and addressing treatment challenges. Critique and Ethical Considerations Essay Example.

    Ethical considerations for the study

    Bloom et al. (2019) does not mention how ethical concerns were addressed in the study. However, there is a need to address the ethical aspects of retrospective database review studies, especially with regards to the primary concern of issues pertaining to confidentiality and informed consent. Besides that, the study received approval from The New England Institutional Review Board (NEIRB, 12–284), specifying that the study did not meet the definition of human-subject research thus not requiring its approval. Critique and Ethical Considerations Essay Example.

    The study is based on information that is already available as medical records with the researcher only required to retrieve the information. This is an indication that the ethical concern about confidentiality and informed concern is an inherent concern since the researchers do not have direct contact with patients. The concern is further highlighted by the fact that medical records are not collected with the explicit intention of informing research studies. As such, there is no a-priori informed consent for the records to be used in research studies. In essence, using the records is ethically questionable since confidential information is accessed and could be misused thereby jeopardizing the relationship between patients and doctors. This is particularly true when sensitive data is accessed by persons not bound by patient-doctor confidentiality, leading to unwanted disclosure that would distress and cause difficulties for the patient. Critique and Ethical Considerations Essay Example. Given the nature of medical records and the difficulty in getting informed consent from patients, retrospective studies using these records can address the ethical concerns about informed consent and confidentiality through four approaches. Firstly, minimal information should be collected and only if necessary. The collected information should only include routine clinical information that does not require informed consent. Secondly, any information that could identify the patients should be eliminated or coded to conceal the patients’ identities. Thirdly, safeguards should be implemented to ensure the ethical use of the collected information, such as having protocols for the information storage and authorized access. Finally, ethical clearance should be sought from an Institutional Review Board (IRB) that provides the required oversight (Sarkar & Seshadri, 2014). Critique and Ethical Considerations Essay Example.

    Article 2.

    “Lai, K. M., Chen, T., Chang, C., Chen, H., & Lee, Y. (2019). Association between NSAID use and mortality risk in patients with end-stage renal disease: A population-based cohort study.
    Clinical Epidemiology
    , 11, 429-441. doi: 10.2147/clep.s204322” Critique and Ethical Considerations Essay Example.

    Summary

    ORDER A CUSTOM-WRITTEN, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW

    Lai et al. (2019) presents the results of a study that investigated the association between NSAIDs use and risk of mortality for persons diagnosed with end-stage renal disease. It acknowledges that pain is a concern among persons diagnosed with end-stage renal disease and it is not uncommon for NSAIDs to be administered. However, it notes that although the pain associated with the disease is a concern and NSAIDs can partially address this concern, of greater concern is the risks associated with the use of NSAIDs. The study seeks to document the risks, providing evidence to show that the adverse effects are tangible thus informing patients and clinicians. Towards this end, the study applies a retrospective approach that collects data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. The selected population sample is for 1 million patients records selected from among 27 million patients records covering the period between 1997 and 2013. The study determined that 78% (2,623) of persons diagnosed with end-stage renal disease and requiring long-term dialysis used NSAIDs. During the study period that covered four years, 1,515 patients in the study population died. The study determined that the use of NSAIDs significantly increased the risk of all-cause mortality for persons diagnosed with end-stage renal disease (Lai et al., 2019). Critique and Ethical Considerations Essay Example.

    Using findings in nursing practice

    The study results are useful for improving care outcomes for persons diagnosed with end-stage renal disease. Using the study results, nursing practice can recommend alternatives to NSAIDs that reduce the risk of mortality. In addition, the results can be used to justify stringent monitoring of patients using NSAIDs so as to reduce the risk of mortality (Lai et al., 2019) Critique and Ethical Considerations Essay Example.

    Ethical considerations for the study

    Lai et al. (2019) mentions that the study was approved by the Joint Institutional Review Board of Taipei Medical University, and the requirement of patient-informed consent was waived (TMU-JIRB No. N201506025). The approval is an indication that the study did not pose any avoidable risk to the participants. Still, the study makes use of medical records thus raising ethical concerns with regards to confidentiality and informed consent since it would be difficult to obtain consent from all participants before the information was used. Although there is no mention of how these concerns were addressed, there is an indication that they were addressed through four approaches. Firstly, minimal information was collected with focus on what was necessary to inform the study and does not require informed consent. Secondly, information was coded to conceal the patients’ identities. Finally, ethical clearance was sought from an IRB that provided the required oversight (Sarkar & Seshadri, 2014). Critique and Ethical Considerations Essay Example.

    References

    Bloom, L., Boyle, K. E., Myers, A. E., Blacketer, C., & Weinstein, R. (2019). Frequency of nonaspirin NSAID-relevant coexisting medical conditions in the primary-care setting: A retrospective database review.
    Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
    , 15, 579-588. doi: 10.2147/tcrm.s189833 Critique and Ethical Considerations Essay Example

    Lai, K. M., Chen, T., Chang, C., Chen, H., & Lee, Y. (2019). Association between NSAID use and mortality risk in patients with end-stage renal disease: A population-based cohort study.
    Clinical Epidemiology
    , 11, 429-441. doi: 10.2147/clep.s204322

    Sarkar, S. & Seshadri, D. (2014). Conducting record review studies in clinical practice.
    Journal of Clinical & Diagnostic Research
    , 8(9), JG01-JG04. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/8301.4806 Critique and Ethical Considerations Essay Example

  • NR 501 Week 4 Concept Analysis Assignment

    NR 501 Week 4 Concept Analysis Assignment

    The 
    Concept Analysis Assignment
     is due by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. (MT) at the end of Week 4. The guidelines are listed below as well as the guidelines and grading rubric for this assignment are located in Course Resources.

    Purpose of Concept Analysis Assignment

    This assignment provides the opportunity for the student to complete an analysis of a concept supported by a 
    nursing
     theory using an identified process. The assignment fosters analytical thinking related to the selected concept as well as application within the profession.

    Concept Analysis Assignment Course Outcomes

    CO 1: Demonstrate logical and creative thinking in the analysis and application of a theory to nursing practice. (PO 2, 5) NR 501 Week 4 Concept Analysis Assignment

    CO 4: Analyze theories from nursing and relevant fields with respect to the components, relationship among the components, and the application to advanced nursing practice. (PO 1)

    ORDER A CUSTOM-WRITTEN, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW

    Due Date
     Sunday 11:59 PM MT at the end of Week 4

    Total Points Possible
    : 250 Points

    Requirements

    Description of the Concept Analysis Assignment Assignment

    This assignment presents a modified method for conducting a concept analysis of 
    ONE
     concept that is important and useful to nursing.  The concept for this assignment must be supported by a published 
    nursing
     theory. The selected concept is identified and then the elements of the analysis process are applied in order to synthesize knowledge for application as demonstrated through the creation of model, borderline, and contrary cases.  Theoretical applications of the concept are also discussed. Non-nursing theories may 
    NOT
     be used. The paper concludes with a synthesis of the student’s new knowledge about the concept. The scholarly literature is incorporated throughout the analysis.

    Only the elements identified in this assignment should be used for this concept analysis. 

    Criteria for Content

    Introduction

    The introduction substantively presents all the following elements:

    Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development.

    Identifies the selected 
    nursing

    Identifies the 
    nursing
     theory that addresses the selected concept.

    Names the sections of the paper.

    Scholarly support is required.

    Definition/Explanation of the selected nursing concept

    This section includes:

    Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required).

    A substantive discussion of this section with support from nursing literature is required.

    Literature review

    This section requires:

    A substantive discussion of 
    at least 6 (six) 
    scholarly nursing literature sources on the selected concept.

    Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in an organized fashion.

    Support from nursing literature is required. 
    Please Note:
     Primary research articles about the selected nursing concept are the most useful resource for the literature review.

    Defining attributes,
     
    for this section:

    A minimum of 
    THREE (3)
     attributes are required.

    A substantive discussion of this section with support from nursing literature is required

    Explanation
    :  An attribute identifies characteristics of a concept.  For this situation, the characteristics of the selected nursing concept are identified and discussed.

    Antecedent and Consequence

    This section requires the identification of:

    1 antecedent
     of the selected nursing concept.

    1 consequence
     of the selected nursing concept.

    A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.

    Explanation:
      An antecedent is an identifiable occurrence that precedes an event.  In this situation, an antecedent precedes a selected nursing concept. A consequence follows or is the result of an event.  In this situation a consequence follows or is the result of the selected nursing concept.

    Empirical Referents

    This section requires the identification of:

    2 (two) 
    empirical referents of the selected nursing concept.

    A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.

    Explanation:
      An empirical referent is an objective ways to measure or determine the presence of the selected nursing concept.

    Construct Cases

    Explanation:
     hypothetical or real-life situations demonstrating the use or absence of the concept.

    This section requires the creation of a model case, borderline case, and contrary case.

    1 Model Case 
    is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas:

    Definition

    All identified attributes

    Explanation:
      A model case is an example of a hypothetical or real-life situation that demonstrates all of the attributes noted previously in this assignment.

    1 Borderline Case
     is created by the student in which one or two of the previously identified attributes are missing.

    1 Contrary Case
     is created by the student that demonstrates the opposite of the selected nursing concepts. All identified attributes of the concept are absent in this cas

    Explanation:
      Borderline case is a created case where one or two of the previously identified attributes are missing. Contrary case is a created case that demonstrate the complete opposite of the selected nursing concept – all identified attributes are missing.

    Theoretical Applications of the Concept

    Discuss the purpose of a concept analysis in relationship to theory.

    Explain how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory.

    A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.

    Conclusion

    This section requires:

    Summarization of key information regarding:

    Selected nursing concept.

    Selected nursing theory.

    Application of concept analysis findings to advanced practice nursing (specific to selected specialty track professional role and/or area of practice).

    The concluding statements include self-reflection on the new knowledge gained from conducting a concept analysis. (Self-reflection may be written in first-person.)

    Preparing the Concept Analysis Assignment

    Criteria for Format and Special Instructions

    The paper (excluding the title page and reference page) should be 
    at least 6, but no more than 8 pages
    . Points will be lost for not meeting these length requirements.

    Title page, running head, body of paper, and reference page must follow APA guidelines as found in the 6
    th
     edition of the manual. This includes the use of headings for each section of the paper except for the introduction where no heading is used.

    The source of the concept for this assignment must be a published 
    nursing
     Non-nursing theories may 
    NOT
     be used.

    A minimum of 
    6
     
    (six)
     scholarly references must be used. Required textbooks for this course, and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information may 
    NOT
     be used as scholarly references for this assignment. A dictionary maybe used as a reference for the section titled “Definition/Explanation of the selected nursing concept”, but it is
     NOT
     counted as one of the 6 required scholarly nursing references. Be aware that information from .com websites may be incorrect and should be avoided.

    References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale is provided and the instructor has approved them.

    Ideas and information from scholarly, peer reviewed, nursing sources must be cited and referenced correctly.

    Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal, scientific writing.

    PLEASE note: Do not rely on .com sites to identify the nursing theory as they do not provide accurate information in all cases.

    Possible Concepts: 
    The following concepts are not required; students may select one of these concepts or find another concept. Each selected concept must be associated with a nursing theory; the use of non-nursing theories is 
    NOT
     allowed. If you have any questions regarding your concept or the nursing theory, please consult with your faculty member for assistance.
     Please note: the concepts of incivility and civility are not allowed for this assignment.

    Adaptation

    Burnout

    Caring

    Comfort

    Compassion

    Compassion fatigue

    Competence

    Cultural humility

    Empowerment

    Engagement

    Health

    Leadership

    Meaningfulness

    Modeling

    Noise

    Pain

    Palliative care

    Quality of life

    Resilience

    Self-care

    Sensory overload

    Situational awareness

    Rubric

    W4 Concept Analysis Guidelines and Rubric

    W4 Concept Analysis Guidelines and Rubric

    Criteria

    Ratings

    Pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction

    10.0 pts
    Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development. Identifies the selected nursing concept. Identifies the nursing theory from which the selected concept was obtained. A nursing theory was used. Identifies the sections of the paper. Scholarly support from nursing literature was provided.

    9.0 pts
    Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development. Identifies the selected nursing concept. Identifies the nursing theory from which the selected concept was obtained. A nursing theory was used. Identifies the sections of the paper. Scholarly support from nursing literature was provided.

    8.0 pts
    Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development. Identifies the selected nursing concept. Identifies the nursing theory from which the selected concept was obtained. A nursing theory was used. Identifies the sections of the paper. Limited scholarly support from nursing literature was provided.

    4.0 pts
    Presentation of information in one or two of the following elements fails to meet expectations: Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development. Identifies the selected nursing concept. Identifies the nursing theory from which the selected concept was obtained. A nursing theory was used. Identifies the sections of the paper. Limited or no scholarly support from nursing literature was provided.

    0.0 pts
    Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements: Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development. Identifies the selected nursing concept. Identifies the nursing theory from which the selected concept was obtained. A nursing theory was used. Identifies the sections of the paper. Limited or no scholarly support from nursing literature was provided.

    10.0 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDefinition/Explanation of Selected ConceptThis section includes: • Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required), and • Information about the concept as discussed by the theorist from the selected nursing theory is substantively presented. References from nursing literature are required.

    25.0 pts
    Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required). Provides support from scholarly sources.

    22.0 pts
    Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required). Provides support from scholarly sources.

    20.0 pts
    Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required). Provides limited support from scholarly sources.

    10.0 pts
    Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations: Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required). Provides limited or no scholarly support.

    0.0 pts
    Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in each of the following elements: Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required). Provides limited or no scholarly support.

    25.0 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLiterature ReviewThis section requires: • A substantive discussion of at least 6 (six) scholarly nursing literature sources on the selected concept. • Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in an organized fashion.

    NR 501 Week 4 Concept Analysis Assignment

    35.0 pts
    Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: A substantive discussion of at least 6 (six) nursing literature sources on the selected concept. Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in an organized fashion.

    31.0 pts
    Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: A substantive discussion of at least 6 (six) nursing literature sources on the selected concept. Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in an organized fashion.

    28.0 pts
    Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: A substantive discussion of at least 6 (six) nursing literature sources on the selected concept. Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in an organized fashion.

    13.0 pts
    Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations: A substantive discussion of at least 6 (six) nursing literature sources on the selected concept. Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in an organized fashion.

    0.0 pts
    Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in each of the following elements: A substantive discussion of at least 6 (six) nursing literature sources on the selected concept. Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in a disorganized fashion.

    35.0 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDefining AttributesFor this section: • A minimum of THREE (3) attributes are required. References from nursing literature are required. NR 501 Week 4 Concept Analysis Assignment

    25.0 pts
    Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: A minimum of 3 (three) attributes Support from scholarly sources provided.

    22.0 pts
    Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: A minimum of 3 (three) attributes are required. Support from scholarly sources provided.

    20.0 pts
    Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: A minimum of 3 (three) attributes are required. Limited support from scholarly sources provided.

    10.0 pts
    Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations: One or two attributes of the selected nursing concepts were presented. Limited or no support from scholarly sources provided.

    0.0 pts
    Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in each of the following elements: No attributes of the selected nursing concept were presented. Limited or no support from scholarly sources provided.

    25.0 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAntecedents & ConsequencesThis section requires the identification of: • 1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept, and • 1 consequence of the selected nursing concept. References from nursing literature are required.

    25.0 pts
    Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: 1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept. 1 consequence of the selected nursing concept. Support from scholarly nursing literature provided.

    22.0 pts
    Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: 1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept. 1 consequence of the selected nursing concept. Support from scholarly nursing literature provided.

    20.0 pts
    Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: 1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept. 1 consequence of the selected nursing concept. Limited support from scholarly nursing literature provided.

    10.0 pts
    Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations: 1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept. 1 consequence of the selected nursing concept. Limited or no support from scholarly nursing literature was provided.

    0.0 pts
    Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two or more of the following elements: 1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept. 1 consequence of selected nursing concept. Limited or no support from scholarly literature was provided.

    25.0 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEmpirical ReferentsThis section requires the identification of: • 2 (two) empirical referents of the selected nursing concept. References from nursing literature are required.

    20.0 pts
    Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: 2 (two) empirical referents of the selected nursing concept. Support from scholarly nursing literature provided.

    18.0 pts
    Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: 2 (two) empirical referents of the selected nursing concept. Support from scholarly nursing literature provided.

    16.0 pts
    Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: 2 (two) empirical referents of the selected nursing concept. Limited support from scholarly nursing literature provided. NR 501 Week 4 Concept Analysis Assignment

    8.0 pts
    Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations: 2(two) empirical referents of the selected nursing concept. Limited or no support from scholarly nursing literature was provided.

    0.0 pts
    Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in each of the following elements: 2(two) empirical referents of the selected nursing concept. Limited or no support from scholarly nursing literature was provided.

    20.0 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConstruct CasesThis section requires: 1 model case is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas: • Definition, • All identified attributes, • Antecedent, • Consequence, and • Empirical referent or Measurement Information from selected nursing theory is applied to the created model case. NR 501 Week 4 Concept Analysis Assignment

    30.0 pts
    Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: 1 Model Case is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas: • Definition • All identified attributes 1 Borderline Case is created by the student in which one or two of the previously identified attributes are missing. 1 Contrary Case is created by the student that demonstrates the opposite of the selected nursing concepts. All identified attributes of the concept are absent in this case.

    26.0 pts
    Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: 1 Model Case is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas: • Definition • All identified attributes 1 Borderline Case is created by the student in which one or two of the previously identified attributes are missing. 1 Contrary Case is created by the student that demonstrates the opposite of the selected nursing concepts. All identified attributes of the concept are absent in this case.

    24.0 pts
    Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: 1 Model Case is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas: • Definition • All identified attributes 1 Borderline Case is created by the student in which one or two of the previously identified attributes are missing. 1 Contrary Case is created by the student that demonstrates the opposite of the selected nursing concepts. All identified attributes of the concept are absent in this case.

    11.0 pts
    Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations: 1 Model Case is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas: • Definition • All identified attributes 1 Borderline Case is created by the student in which one or two of the previously identified attributes are missing. 1 Contrary Case is created by the student that demonstrates the opposite of the selected nursing concepts. All identified attributes of the concept are absent in this case.

    0.0 pts
    Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two or more of the following elements: 1 Model Case is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas: • Definition • All identified attributes 1 Borderline Case is created by the student in which one or two of the previously identified attributes are missing. 1 Contrary Case is created by the student that demonstrates the opposite of the selected nursing concepts. All identified attributes of the concept are absent in this case.

    30.0 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTheoretical Applications of the ConceptThis section requires: • The identification of 2 (two) alternative cases correctly created and presented. The two required alternative cases are: o Borderline (absence of one or two of previously identified attributes of the selected nursing concept. o Contrary (demonstrates the complete opposite of selected nursing concept Applies information from selected nursing theory.

    30.0 pts
    Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: Discusses the purpose of a concept analysis in relationship to theory. Explains how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory. A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.

    26.0 pts
    Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: Discusses the purpose of a concept analysis in relationship to theory. Explains how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory. A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required

    24.0 pts
    Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: Discusses the purpose of a concept analysis in relationship to theory. Explains how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory. A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.

    11.0 pts
    Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations: Discusses the purpose of a concept analysis in relationship to theory. Explains how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory. A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.

    0.0 pts
    Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two or more of the following elements: Discusses the purpose of a concept analysis in relationship to theory. Explains how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory. A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.

    30.0 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusionThis section requires: • Summarization of key information regarding: • Selected nursing concept, • Selected nursing theory, and • Application of concept analysis findings to advanced nursing practice.

    10.0 pts
    Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: Summarizes information on selected nursing concept. Summarizes information on selected nursing theory. Summarizes the application of concept analysis findings to advanced nursing practice. Self-reflection on the new knowledge gained regarding concept analysis.

    9.0 pts
    Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: Summarizes information on selected nursing concept. Summarizes information on selected nursing theory. Summarizes the application of concept analysis findings to advanced nursing practice. Self-reflection on the new knowledge gained regarding concept analysis.

    8.0 pts
    Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: Summarizes information on selected nursing concept. Summarizes information on selected nursing theory. Summarizes the application of concept analysis findings to advanced nursing practice. Self-reflection on the new knowledge gained regarding concept analysis.

    4.0 pts
    Presentation of information in one or two of the following elements fails to meet expectations: Summarizes information on selected nursing concept. Summarizes information on selected nursing theory. Summarizes the application of concept analysis findings to advanced nursing practice. Self-reflection on the new knowledge gained regarding concept analysis.

    0.0 pts
    Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements: Summarizes information on selected nursing concept. Summarizes information on selected nursing theory. Summarizes the application of concept analysis findings to advanced nursing practice. Self-reflection on the new knowledge gained regarding concept analysis.

    10.0 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePaper SpecificationsA nursing theory was used. The source of the concept for this assignment was a published nursing theory. Non-nursing theories may NOT be used. Paper meets length requirements of 8 to 10 pages Minimum of 6 scholarly nursing references A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, may NOT be used as scholarly references for this assignment. References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale is provided and the instructor has approved them.

    20.0 pts
    This section included all of the following: A nursing theory was used. The source of the concept for this assignment was a published nursing theory. Paper meet length requirements of 6 to 8 page. Minimum of 6 scholarly nursing references A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references. References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them.

    18.0 pts
    This section included three of the following: A nursing theory was used. The source of the concept for this assignment was a published nursing theory. Paper meet length requirements of 6 to 8 pages Minimum of 6 scholarly nursing references A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references. References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them.

    16.0 pts
    This section included only two of the following: A nursing theory was used. The source of the concept for this assignment was a published nursing theory. Paper meet length requirements of 6 to 8 pages Minimum of 6 scholarly nursing references A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references. References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them.

    8.0 pts
    This section included only one of the following: A nursing theory was used. The source of the concept for this assignment was a published nursing theory. Paper meet length requirements of 6 to 8 pages Minimum of 6 scholarly nursing references A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references. References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them.

    0.0 pts
    This section included none of the following: A nursing theory was used. The source of the concept for this assignment was a published nursing theory. Paper meet length requirements of 6 to 8 pages Minimum of 6 scholarly nursing references A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references. References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them.

    20.0 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Format (6th edition)Title page, running head, body of paper, and reference page must follow APA guidelines as found in the 6th edition of the manual. This includes the use of headings for each section of the paper except for the introduction where no heading is used. One deduction for each type of APA style error

    10.0 pts
    APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page, • running head, • body of paper (including citations and headings), and • reference page One deduction for each type of APA format error 0 to 1 APA error was present

    9.0 pts
    APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page, • running head, • body of paper (including citations and headings), and • reference page One deduction for each type of APA format error 2 – 3 APA errors were present

    8.0 pts
    APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page, • running head, • body of paper (including citations and headings), and • reference page One deduction for each type of APA format error 4 – 5 APA were are present

    4.0 pts
    APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page, • running head, • body of paper (including citations and headings), and • reference page One deduction for each type of APA format error 6 – 7 APA were are present

    0.0 pts
    APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page, • running head, • body of paper (including citations and headings), and • reference page One deduction for each type of APA format error 8 or greater APA errors were present

    10.0 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCitationsIdeas and information that come from readings must be cited and referenced correctly.

    5.0 pts
    There were 0-1 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge Permission to use references older than 5 years was obtained from faculty.

    4.0 pts
    There were 2-3 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge Permission to use references older than 5 years was NOT obtained from faculty.

    3.0 pts
    There were 4-5 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge

    2.0 pts
    There were 6-7 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge

    0.0 pts
    There were 8 or greater errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge

    5.0 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting QualityRules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual.

    5.0 pts
    1–2 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual

    4.0 pts
    3 – 4 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual

    3.0 pts
    5 – 6 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual

    2.0 pts
    7 – 8 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual

    0.0 pts
    9 or greater errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual

    NR 501 Week 4 Concept Analysis Assignment

  • NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines and Rubric

    NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines and Rubric

    Purpose

    This assignment provides the opportunity for the student to complete an analysis of a concept supported by a
    nursing
    theory using an identified process. The assignment fosters analytical thinking related to the selected concept as well as application within the profession. NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines and Rubric.

    Course Outcomes

    Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to:

    (CO#1) Analyze theories from nursing and relevant fields with respect to their components, relationships among the components, logic of the propositions, comprehensiveness, and utility to advanced nursing. (PO1)

    (CO#3) Communicate the analysis of and proposed strategies for the use of a theory in nursing practice. (PO3, 7, 10)

    (CO#4)

    Demonstrate logical and creative thinking in the analysis and application of a theory to nursing practice. (PO4. 7)

     

    Due Date
    Sunday 11:59 PM MT at the end of Week 3 NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines and Rubric

    Total Points Possible
    : 250 Points

    Requirements

    Description of the Assignment

    This assignment presents a modified method for conducting a concept analysis of
    ONE
    concept that is important and useful to nursing.  The concept for this assignment must be supported by a published
    nursing
    theory. The selected concept is identified and then the elements of the analysis process are applied in order to synthesize knowledge for application as demonstrated through the creation of model, borderline, and contrary cases.  Theoretical applications of the concept are also discussed. Non-nursing theories may
    NOT
    be used. The paper concludes with a synthesis of the student’s new knowledge about the concept. The scholarly literature is incorporated throughout the analysis.

     

    Only the elements identified in this assignment should be used for this concept analysis. 

    Criteria for Content

    Introduction

    The introduction substantively presents all the following elements:

    Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development.

    Identifies the selected
    nursing

    Identifies the
    nursing
    theory that addresses the selected concept.

    Names the sections of the paper.

    Scholarly support is required.

     

    Definition/Explanation of the selected nursing concept

    This section includes:

    Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required).

    A substantive discussion of this section with support from nursing literature is required.

     

    Literature review

    This section requires:

    A substantive discussion of
    at least 6 (six)
    scholarly nursing literature sources on the selected concept.

    Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in an organized fashion.

    Support from nursing literature is required.

     

    Please Note:
    Primary research articles about the selected nursing concept are the most useful resource for the literature review.

    Defining attributes

    For this section:

    A minimum of
    THREE (3)
    attributes are required.

    A substantive discussion of this section with support from nursing literature is required

     

    Explanation
    :  An attribute identifies characteristics of a concept.  For this situation, the characteristics of the selected nursing concept are identified and discussed.

     

    Antecedent and Consequence

    This section requires the identification of:

    1 antecedent
    of the selected nursing concept.

    1 consequence
    of the selected nursing concept.

    A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.

     

    Explanation:
      An antecedent is an identifiable occurrence that precedes an event.  In this situation, an antecedent precedes a selected nursing concept. A consequence follows or is the result of an event.  In this situation a consequence follows or is the result of the selected nursing concept.

     

    Empirical Referents

    This section requires the identification of:

    2 (two)
    empirical referents of the selected nursing concept.

    A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.

     

    Explanation:
      An empirical referent is an objective ways to measure or determine the presence of the selected nursing concept.

     

    Construct Cases

    Explanation:
    hypothetical or real-life situations demonstrating the use or absence of the concept.

    This section requires the creation of a model case, borderline case, and contrary case.

    1 Model Case
    is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas:

    Definition

    All identified attributes

     

    Explanation:
     A model case is an example of a hypothetical or real-life situation that demonstrates all of the attributes noted previously in this assignment.

     

    1 Borderline Case
    is created by the student in which one or two of the previously identified attributes are missing.

    1 Contrary Case
    is created by the student that demonstrates the opposite of the selected nursing concepts. All identified attributes of the concept are absent in this case.

     

    Explanation:
      Borderline case is a created case where one or two of the previously identified attributes are missing. Contrary case is a created case that demonstrate the complete opposite of the selected nursing concept – all identified attributes are missing.

     

    Theoretical Applications of the Concept

    Discuss the purpose of a concept analysis in relationship to theory.

    Explain how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory.

    A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.

     

    Conclusion

    This section requires:

    Summarization of key information regarding:

    Selected nursing concept.

    Selected nursing theory.

    Application of concept analysis findings to advanced practice nursing (specific to selected specialty track professional role and/or area of practice).

    The concluding statements include self-reflection on the new knowledge gained from conducting a concept analysis. (Self-reflection may be written in first-person.)

     

    Preparing the Assignment

    Criteria for Format and Special Instructions

    The paper (excluding the title page and reference page) should be
    at least 6, but no more than 8 pages
    . Points will be lost for not meeting these length requirements.

    Title page, running head, body of paper, and reference page must follow APA guidelines as found in the 6
    th
    edition of the manual. This includes the use of headings for each section of the paper except for the introduction where no heading is used.

    The source of the concept for this assignment must be a published
    nursing
    Non-nursing theories may
    NOT
    be used.

    A minimum of
    6

    (six)
    scholarly references must be used. Required textbooks for this course, and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information may
    NOT
    be used as scholarly references for this assignment. A dictionary maybe used as a reference for the section titled “Definition/Explanation of the selected nursing concept”, but it is
    NOT
    counted as one of the 6 required scholarly nursing references. Be aware that information from .com websites may be incorrect and should be avoided.

    References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale is provided and the instructor has approved them.

    Ideas and information from scholarly, peer reviewed, nursing sources must be cited and referenced correctly.

    Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal, scientific writing.

    PLEASE note: Do not rely on .com sites to identify the nursing theory as they do not provide accurate information in all cases.

    Possible Concepts:
    The following concepts are not required; students may select one of these concepts or find another concept. Each selected concept must be associated with a nursing theory; the use of non-nursing theories is
    NOT
    allowed. If you have any questions regarding your concept or the nursing theory, please consult with your faculty member for assistance.
    Please note: the concepts of incivility and civility are not allowed for this assignment.

    ·         Adaptation

    ·         Burnout

    ·         Caring

    ·         Comfort

    ·         Compassion

    ·         Compassion fatigue

    ·         Competence

    ·         Cultural humility

    ·         Empowerment

    ·         Engagement

    ·         Health

    ·         Leadership

    ·         Meaningfulness

    ·         Modeling

    ·         Noise

    ·         Pain

    ·         Palliative care

    ·         Quality of life

    ·         Resilience

    ·         Self-care

    ·         Sensory overload

    ·         Situational awareness

     

     

     

    Directions and Assignment Criteria

    Assignment Criteria

    Points

    %

    Description

    Introduction

    10

    4

    The introduction substantively presents all the following elements:

    ·         Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development.

    ·         Identifies the selected
    nursing
    concept.

    ·         Identifies the
    nursing
    theory that addresses the selected concept.

    ·         Names the sections of the paper.

    ·         Scholarly support is required.

    Definition/Explanation of Selected Concept

    25

    10

    This section includes:

    ·         Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required).

    ·         A substantive discussion of this section with support from nursing literature is required.

    Literature Review                                                                      

    35

    14

    This section requires:

    ·         A substantive discussion of
    at least 6 (six)
    scholarly nursing literature sources on the selected concept.

    ·         Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in an organized fashion.

    ·         Support from nursing literature is required.

    Defining Attributes

    25

    10

    For this section:

    ·         A minimum of
    THREE (3)
    attributes are required.

    ·         A substantive discussion of this section with support from nursing literature is required

    Antecedent & Consequence

    25

    10

    This section requires the identification of:

    ·        
    1 antecedent
    of the selected nursing concept.

    ·        
    1 consequence
    of the selected nursing concept.

    ·         A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.

    Empirical Referents

    20

    8

    This section requires the identification of:

    ·        
    2 (two)
    empirical referents of the selected nursing concept.

    ·         A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.

    Construct Cases

    30

    12

    This section requires:

    ·        
    1 Model Case
    is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas:

    o   Definition

    o   All identified attributes

    ·        
    1 Borderline Case
    is created by the student in which one or two of the previously identified attributes are missing.

    ·        
    1 Contrary Case
    is created by the student that demonstrates the opposite of the selected nursing concepts. All identified attributes of the concept are absent in this case.

    Theoretical Applications of the Concept

    30

    12

    This section requires:

    ·         Discussion of the purpose of a concept analysis in relationship to theory.

    ·         Explanation on how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory.

    ·         A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.

    Conclusion

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    10

    4

    This section requires:

    ·         Summarization of key information regarding:

    ·         Selected nursing concept.

    ·         Selected nursing theory.

    ·         Application of concept analysis findings to advanced practice nursing (specific to selected specialty track professional role and/or area of practice).

    ·         The concluding statements include self-reflection on the new knowledge gained from conducting a concept analysis. (Self-reflection may be written in first-person.)

    Paper Specifications

    20

    8

    A nursing theory was used.

     

    The source of the concept for this assignment was a published nursing theory.  Non-nursing theories may
    NOT
    be used.

    Paper meets length requirements of
    6 to 8 pages

     

    Minimum of 6 scholarly nursing references

    A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, may
    NOT
    be used as scholarly references for this assignment.

     

    References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale is provided and the instructor has approved them.

    APA Format (6
    th
    edition)

    10

    4

    Title page, running head, body of paper, and reference page must follow APA guidelines as found in the 6
    th
    edition of the manual. This includes the use of headings for each section of the paper except for the introduction where no heading is used.

    One deduction for each type of APA style error

    Citations in Text

    5

    2

    Ideas and information that come from readings must be cited and referenced correctly.

    Writing Mechanics

    5

    2

    Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal written work as found in the 6
    th
    edition of the APA manual.

    Total

     250

    100
    %

    A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.

     

     

     

     

              Grading Rubric

    Assignment Criteria

    Exceptional

    (100%)

    Outstanding or highest level of performance

    Exceeds

    (88%)

    Very good or high level of performance

    Meets

    (80%)

    Competent or satisfactory level of performance

    Needs Improvement

    (38%)

    Poor or failing level of performance

    Developing

    (0)

    Unsatisfactory level of performance

    Content

    Possible Points = 230 Points

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Introduction

     10 Points

    9 Points

    8 Points

    4  Points

    0 Points

    Presentation of information was exceptional and included
    all
    of the following elements:

     

    Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development.

     

    Identifies the selected
    nursing
    concept.

     

    Identifies the
    nursing
    theory from which the selected concept was obtained.

     

    A nursing theory was used.

     

    Identifies the sections of the paper.

     

    Scholarly support from nursing literature was provided.

     

    Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included
    all
    of the following elements:

     

    Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development.

     

    Identifies the selected
    nursing
    concept.

     

    Identifies the
    nursing
    theory from which the selected concept was obtained.

     

    A nursing theory was used.

     

     

    Identifies the sections of the paper.

     

    Scholarly support from nursing literature was provided.

     

     

     

     

    Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the
    all
    of the following elements: NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines and Rubric

     

    Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development.

     

    Identifies the selected
    nursing
    concept.

     

    Identifies the
    nursing
    theory from which the selected concept was obtained.

     

    A nursing theory was used.

     

    Identifies the sections of the paper.

     

    Limited scholarly support from nursing literature was provided.

     

    Presentation of

    information in
    one or two
    of the following elements fails to meet expectations:

     

    Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development.

     

    Identifies the selected
    nursing
    concept.

     

    Identifies the
    nursing
    theory from which the selected concept was obtained.

     

    A nursing theory was used.

     

    Identifies the sections of the paper.

     

    Limited or no scholarly support from nursing literature was provided. NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines and Rubric

     

     

     

    Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in
    three or more
    of the following elements:

     

    Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development.

     

    Identifies the selected
    nursing
    concept.

     

    Identifies the
    nursing
    theory from which the selected concept was obtained.

     

    A nursing theory was used.

     

    Identifies the sections of the paper.

     

     

    Limited or no scholarly support from nursing literature was provided.

     

    Definition/

    Explanation of Selected Concept

    25  Points

    22 Points

     20 Points

     10 Points

    0 Points

    Presentation of information was exceptional and included
    all
    of the following elements:

     

    Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required).

     

    Provides support from scholarly sources.

     

    Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included
    all
    of the following elements:

     

    Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required).

     

    Provides support from scholarly sources.

     

    Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the
    all
    of the following elements:

     

    Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required).

     

    Provides limited support from scholarly sources.

     

    Presentation of

    information in
    one
     of the following elements fails to meet expectations:

     

    Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required).

     

    Provides limited or no scholarly support.

     

    Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in
    each
    of the following elements:

     

    Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required).

     

    Provides limited or no scholarly support.

     

     

     

    Literature Review

    35 Points

    31 Points

    28 Points

    13 Points

    0 Points

    Presentation of information was exceptional and included
    all
    of the following elements:

     

    A substantive discussion of
    at least 6 (six)
    nursing literature sources on the selected concept.

     

    Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in an organized fashion.

    Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included
    all
    of the following elements:

     

    A substantive discussion of
    at least 6 (six)
    nursing literature sources on the selected concept.

     

    Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in an organized fashion.

    Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the
    all
    of the following elements:

     

    A substantive discussion of at
    least 6 (six)
    nursing literature sources on the selected concept.

     

    Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in an organized fashion.

    Presentation of

    information in
    one
    of the following elements fails to meet expectations:

     

    A substantive discussion of at least
    6 (six)
    nursing literature sources on the selected concept.

     

    Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in an organized fashion.

    Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in
    each
    of the following elements:

     

    A substantive discussion of at least
    6 (six)
    nursing literature sources on the selected concept.

     

    Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in a disorganized fashion.

    Defining Attributes

     

    25  Points

    22 Points

     20 Points

     10 Points

    0 Points

    Presentation of information was exceptional and included
    all
    of the following elements:

     

    A minimum of 3 (three) attributes

     

    Support from scholarly sources provided.

     

    Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included
    all
    of the following elements: NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines and Rubric

     

    A minimum of 3 (three) attributes are required.

     

    Support from scholarly sources provided.

     

    Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the
    all
    of the following elements:

     

    A minimum of 3 (three) attributes are required.

     

    Limited support from scholarly sources provided.

     

    Presentation of

    information in
    one
    of the following elements fails to meet expectations:

     

    One or two attributes of the selected nursing concepts were presented.

     

    Limited or no support from scholarly sources provided.

     

    Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in
    each
    of the following elements:

     

    No attributes of the selected nursing concept were presented.

     

    Limited or no support from scholarly sources provided.

     

    Antecedent & Consequence

    25  Points

    22 Points

     20 Points

     10 Points

    0 Points

    Presentation of information was exceptional and included
    all
    of the following elements:

     

    1 antecedent
    of the selected nursing concept.

     

    1 consequence
    of the selected nursing concept.

     

    Support from scholarly nursing literature provided.

     

    Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included
    all
    of the following elements:

     

    1 antecedent
    of the selected nursing concept.

     

    1 consequence
    of the selected nursing concept.

     

    Support from scholarly nursing literature provided.

     

    Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the
    all
    of the following elements:

     

    1 antecedent
    of the selected nursing concept.

     

    1 consequence
    of the selected nursing concept.

     

    Limited support from scholarly nursing literature provided.

     

    Presentation of

    information in
    one
    of the following elements fails to meet expectations:

     

    1 antecedent
    of the selected nursing concept.

     

    1 consequence
    of the selected nursing concept.

     

    Limited or no support from scholarly nursing literature was provided. NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines and Rubric

     

    Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in
    two or more
    of the following elements:

     

    1 antecedent
    of the selected nursing concept.

    1 consequence
    of selected nursing concept.

     

    Limited or no support from scholarly literature was provided.

    Empirical Referents

    20  Points

    18 Points

     16 Points

     8 Points

    0 Points

    Presentation of information was exceptional and included
    all
    of the following elements:

     

    2 (two)
    empirical referents of the selected nursing concept.

     

    Support from scholarly nursing literature provided.

     

    Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included
    all
    of the following elements:

     

    2 (two)
    empirical referents of the selected nursing concept.

     

    Support from scholarly nursing literature provided.

    Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the
    all
    of the following elements:

     

    2 (two)
    empirical referents of the selected nursing concept.

     

    Limited support from scholarly nursing literature provided.

    Presentation of

    information in
    one
    of the following elements fails to meet expectations:

     

    2(two)
    empirical referents of the selected nursing concept.

     

    Limited or no support from scholarly nursing literature was provided.

     

    Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in
    each
    of the following elements:

     

    2(two)
    empirical referents of the selected nursing concept.

     

     

    Limited or no support from scholarly nursing literature was provided.

     

    Construct Cases

     

     

    30 Points

    26 Points

    24 Points

    11 Points

    0 Points

    Presentation of information was exceptional and included
    all
    of the following elements:

     

    1 Model Case
    is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas:

    ·         Definition

    ·         All identified attributes

    1 Borderline Case
    is created by the student in which one or two of the previously identified attributes are missing.

    1 Contrary Case
    is created by the student that demonstrates the opposite of the selected nursing concepts. All identified attributes of the concept are absent in this case.

    Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included
    all
    of the following elements: NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines and Rubric

     

    1 Model Case
    is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas:

    ·         Definition

    ·         All identified attributes

    1 Borderline Case
    is created by the student in which one or two of the previously identified attributes are missing.

    1 Contrary Case
    is created by the student that demonstrates the opposite of the selected nursing concepts. All identified attributes of the concept are absent in this case.

    Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the
    all
    of the following elements:

     

    1 Model Case
    is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas:

    ·         Definition

    ·         All identified attributes

    1 Borderline Case
    is created by the student in which one or two of the previously identified attributes are missing.

    1 Contrary Case
    is created by the student that demonstrates the opposite of the selected nursing concepts. All identified attributes of the concept are absent in this case.

    Presentation of

    information in
    one
    of the following elements fails to meet expectations:

     

    1 Model Case
    is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas:

    ·         Definition

    ·         All identified attributes

    1 Borderline Case
    is created by the student in which one or two of the previously identified attributes are missing.

    1 Contrary Case
    is created by the student that demonstrates the opposite of the selected nursing concepts. All identified attributes of the concept are absent in this case.

    Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in
    two or more
    of the following elements:

     

     

    1 Model Case
    is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas:

    ·         Definition

    ·         All identified attributes

    1 Borderline Case
    is created by the student in which one or two of the previously identified attributes are missing.

    1 Contrary Case
    is created by the student that demonstrates the opposite of the selected nursing concepts. All identified attributes of the concept are absent in this case.

    Theoretical Applications of the Concept

    30 Points

    26 Points

    24 Points

    11 Points

    0 Points

    Presentation of information was exceptional and included
    all
    of the following elements:

     

    Discusses the purpose of a concept analysis in relationship to theory.

     

    Explains how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory.

     

    A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.

    Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included
    all
    of the following elements:

     

    Discusses the purpose of a concept analysis in relationship to theory.

     

    Explains how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory.

     

     

    A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.

    Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the
    all
    of the following elements:

     

    Discusses the purpose of a concept analysis in relationship to theory.

     

    Explains how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory.

     

    A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.

    Presentation of information in
    one
    of the following elements fails to meet expectations:

     

    Discusses the purpose of a concept analysis in relationship to theory. NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines and Rubric

     

    Explains how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory.

     

    A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.

    Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in
    two or more
    of the following elements:

     

    Discusses the purpose of a concept analysis in relationship to theory.

     

    Explains how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory.

     

    A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.

    Conclusion

     10 Points

    9 Points

    8 Points

    4  Points

    0 Points

    Presentation of information was exceptional and included
    all
    of the following elements:

     

    Summarizes information on selected nursing concept. NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines and Rubric

     

    Summarizes information on selected nursing theory.

     

    Summarizes the application of concept analysis findings to advanced nursing practice.

     

    Self-reflection on the new knowledge gained regarding concept analysis.

     

    Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included
    all
    of the following elements:

     

    Summarizes information on selected nursing concept.

     

    Summarizes information on selected nursing theory.

     

    Summarizes the application of concept analysis findings to advanced nursing practice.

     

    Self-reflection on the new knowledge gained regarding concept analysis.

     

    Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the
    all
    of the following elements:

     

    Summarizes information on selected nursing concept.

     

    Summarizes information on selected nursing theory.

     

    Summarizes the application of concept analysis findings to advanced nursing practice.

     

    Self-reflection on the new knowledge gained regarding concept analysis.

     

    Presentation of

    information in
    one or two
    of the following elements fails to meet expectations:

     

    Summarizes information on selected nursing concept.

     

    Summarizes information on selected nursing theory.

     

    Summarizes the application of concept analysis findings to advanced nursing practice.

     

    Self-reflection on the new knowledge gained regarding concept analysis.

     

    Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in
    three or more
    of the following elements:

     

    Summarizes information on selected nursing concept.

     

    Summarizes information on selected nursing theory.

     

    Summarizes the application of concept analysis findings to advanced nursing practice.

     

    Self-reflection on the new knowledge gained regarding concept analysis.

     

    Paper Specifications

    20  Points

    18 Points

     16 Points

     8 Points

    0 Points

    This section included
    all
    of the following:

     

    A nursing theory was used.

     

    The source of the concept for this assignment was a published nursing theory.

    Paper meet length requirements of 6 to 8 page.

     

    Minimum of 6 scholarly nursing references

     

    A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were
    NOT
    used as scholarly references.

     

    References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them.

    This section included
    three
    of the following:

     

    A nursing theory was used.

     

    The source of the concept for this assignment was a published nursing theory.

     

    Paper meet length requirements of 6 to 8 pages

     

    Minimum of 6 scholarly nursing references

    A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were
    NOT
    used as scholarly references.

     

    References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them.

    This section included only
    two
    of the following:

     

    A nursing theory was used.

     

    The source of the concept for this assignment was a published nursing theory.

    Paper meet length requirements of 6 to 8 pages

     

    Minimum of 6 scholarly nursing references

    A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were
    NOT
    used as scholarly references.

     

    References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them.

    This section included only
    one
    of the following:

     

    A nursing theory was used.

     

    The source of the concept for this assignment was a published nursing theory.

     

    Paper meet length requirements of 6 to 8 pages

     

    Minimum of 6 scholarly nursing references

    A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were
    NOT
    used as scholarly references.

     

    References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them.

    This section included
    none
    of the following:

     

    A nursing theory was used.

     

    The source of the concept for this assignment was a published nursing theory.

     

    Paper meet length requirements of 6 to 8 pages

     

    Minimum of 6 scholarly nursing references

    A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were
    NOT
    used as scholarly references.

     

    References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them.

    Content Subtotal

     

     

    _____of  230 points

    Format

    Possible Points =  20 Points

    APA Style

     10 Points

    9 Points

    8 Points

    4  Points

    0 Points

    APA guidelines, as per the 6
    th
    edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the

    ·         title page,

    ·         running head,

    ·         body of paper (including citations and headings), and

    ·         reference page

    One deduction for each type of APA format error

     

    0 to 1
    APA error was present

    APA guidelines, as per the 6
    th
    edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the

    ·         title page,

    ·         running head,

    ·         body of paper (including citations and headings), and

    ·         reference page

     

    One deduction for each type of APA format error

    NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines and Rubric

     

    2 –  3
    APA errors were present

    APA guidelines, as per the 6
    th
    edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the

    ·         title page,

    ·         running head,

    ·         body of paper (including citations and headings), and

    ·         reference page

     

    One deduction for each type of APA format error

     

    4 – 5
    APA were are present

    APA guidelines, as per the 6
    th
    edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the

    ·         title page,

    ·         running head,

    ·         body of paper (including citations and headings), and

    ·         reference page

     

    One deduction for each type of APA format error

     

    6 – 7
    APA were are  present

    APA guidelines, as per the 6
    th
    edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the

    ·         title page,

    ·         running head,

    ·         body of paper (including citations and headings), and

    ·         reference page

     

    One deduction for each type of APA format error

     

    8 or greater
    APA errors were present

    Citations

    5  Points

    4  Points

    3 Points

     2 Points

    0 Points

    There were 0-1 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information  that contributed to knowledge

     

    Permission to use references older than 5 years was obtained from faculty.

    There were 2-3  errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge

     

    Permission to use references older than 5 years was
    NOT
    obtained from faculty.

    There were 4-5 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge

     

     

    There were 6-7 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge

    NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines and Rubric

    There were 8 or greater errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge

    Writing Quality

    5  Points

    4  Points

    3 Points

     2 Points

    0 Points

    1–2
    errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6
    th
    edition of the APA manual

    3 – 4
    errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6
    th
    edition of the APA manual

     

    5 – 6
    errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6
    th
    edition of the APA manual

     

    7 – 8
    errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6
    th
    edition of the APA manual

     

    9 or greater
    errors
    or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6
    th
    edition of the APA manual

     

    Format Subtotal

    _____of   20 points

    Total Points

    _____of  250 points

    Comments: NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines and Rubric

  • Comprehensive SOAP Template

    Comprehensive SOAP Template

     

    This
    template
    is for a full history and physical. For this course include only areas that are related to the case.

     

    Patient Initials: _______                 Age: _______                                   Gender: _______

     

    Note: The mnemonic below is included for your reference and should be removed before the submission of your final note.

    L =location

    O= onset

    BUY A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

    C= character

    A= associated signs and symptoms

    T= timing

    E= exacerbating/relieving factors

    S= severity

     

    SUBJECTIVE DATA:
    Include what the patient tells you, but organize the information.

     

    Chief Complaint (CC):
    In just a few words, explain why the patient came to the clinic.

     

    History of Present Illness (HPI):
    This is the symptom analysis section of your note. Thorough documentation in this section is essential for patient care, coding, and billing analysis. Paint a picture of what is wrong with the patient. You need to start EVERY HPI with age, race, and gender (e.g., 34-year-old AA male). You must include the
    seven attributes of

    each principal symptom in paragraph form not a list
    . If the CC was “headache”, the LOCATES for the HPI might look like the following example:

    Location: head

    Onset: 3 days ago

    Character: pounding, pressure around the eyes and temples

    Associated signs and symptoms: nausea, vomiting, photophobia, phonophobia

    Timing: after being on the computer all day at work

    Exacerbating/ relieving factors: light bothers eyes, Aleve makes it tolerable but not completely better

    Severity: 7/10 pain scale

     

    Medications:
    Include over-the-counter, vitamin, and herbal supplements. List each one by name with dosage and frequency.

     

    Allergies:
    Include specific reactions to medications, foods, insects, and environmental factors. Identify if it is an allergy or intolerance.

     

    Past Medical History (PMH):
    Include illnesses (also childhood illnesses), hospitalizations.

     

    Past Surgical History (PSH):
    Include dates, indications, and types of operations.

     

    Sexual/Reproductive History: If applicable,
    include obstetric history, menstrual history, methods of contraception, sexual function, and risky sexual behaviors.

     

    Personal/Social History:
    Include tobacco use, alcohol use, drug use, patient’s interests, ADL’s and IADL’s if applicable, and exercise and eating habits.

     

    Immunization History:
    Include last Tdap, Flu, pneumonia, etc.

     

    Significant Family History:
    Include history of parents, grandparents, siblings, and children.

     

    Lifestyle:
    Include cultural factors, economic factors, safety, and support systems and sexual preference.

     

    Review of Systems:
    From head-to-toe, include each system that covers the Chief Complaint, History of Present Illness, and History (this includes the systems that address any previous diagnoses). Remember that the information you include in this section is based on what the patient tells you so ensure that you include all essentials in your case (refer to Chapter 2 of the Sullivan text).

    General:
    Include any recent weight changes, weakness, fatigue, or fever, but
    do not restate HPI data here
    .

                HEENT:

    Neck:

                Breasts:

                Respiratory:

                Cardiovascular/Peripheral Vascular:

                Gastrointestinal:

                Genitourinary:

                Musculoskeletal:

                Psychiatric:

                Neurological:

                Skin: 

    Hematologic:

                Endocrine:

                Allergic/Immunologic:

     

    OBJECTIVE DATA:
    From head-to-toe, include what you see, hear, and feel when doing your physical exam. You only need to examine the systems that are pertinent to the CC, HPI, and History unless you are doing a total H&P- only in this course.
    Do not use “WNL” or “normal.” You must describe what you see.

     

    Physical Exam:

    Vital signs:
    Include vital signs, ht, wt, and BMI.

    General:
    Include general state of health, posture, motor activity, and gait. This may also include dress, grooming, hygiene, odors of body or breath, facial expression, manner, level of consciousness, and affect and reactions to people and things.

    HEENT:

    Neck:

    Chest

    Lungs:

    Heart

    Peripheral Vascular: Abdomen:

    Genital/Rectal:

    Musculoskeletal:

    Neurological:

    Skin:

    Include any labs, x-rays, or other diagnostics that are needed to develop the differential diagnoses.

     

    ASSESSMENT:
    List your priority diagnosis (es). For each priority diagnosis, list at least three differential diagnoses, each of which must be supported with evidence and guidelines. For holistic care, you need to include previous diagnoses and indicate whether these are controlled or not controlled. These should also be included in your treatment plan.

     

    PLAN:
    Include additional laboratory and diagnostic tests, consults, therapeutic modalities, health promotion patient education as well as disposition/follow up instructions as they pertain to your patients’ assessment.
     

    Treatment Plan:
    If applicable, include both pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies, alternative therapies, follow-up recommendations, referrals, consultations, and any additional labs, x-ray, or other diagnostics. Support the treatment plan with evidence and guidelines.

     

    Health Promotion:
    Include exercise, diet, and safety recommendations, as well as any other health promotion strategies for the patient/family. Support the health promotion recommendations and strategies with evidence and guidelines.

     

    Disease Prevention:
    As appropriate for the patient’s age, include disease prevention recommendations and strategies such as fasting lipid profile, mammography, colonoscopy, immunizations, etc. Support the disease prevention recommendations and strategies with evidence and guidelines.

     

    REFLECTION:
    Document what you learned from this experience? Any ah-ha’s?

     

    You are required to include at least three evidence based peer-reviewed journal articles or evidenced based guidelines which relates to this case to support your diagnostics and differentials diagnoses. Be sure to use correct APA 6th edition formatting.

     

    ________________________

    Preceptor Signature and Date

    Signature is REQUIRED for this Comprehensive SOAP Template assignment.