Tag: Essay

Unit:
Organisational Learning and Change
Type of Assessment:
Assessment 2 – Individual essay
Unit Learning Outcomes addressed:
Learning outcomes – (a), (c), (d), (e) and (f)
a) Critically analyse and critique the major theories of organisational learning.
c) Critically review and evaluate the reasons for different approaches to change, and demonstrate an ability to apply this understanding to volatile or novel organisational contexts.
d) Critically analyse and critique common perspectives on the role of, and relationship between, individuals, teams and leaders in the change processes.
e) Integrate biblical frameworks into a contemporary understanding of organisational learning and change.
f) Integrate the concepts of organisational learning, strategic andinnovative change management with leadership theory andpractice
Criteria for Assessment:
· Criterion 1 – Extent to which question is answered (5/30)
· Criterion 2 – Understanding of the theoretical concepts (10/30)
· Criterion 3 – Extent of critical analysis (10/30)
· Criterion 4 – Structure and references (5/30)
Assessment Task:
The purpose of this assessment is to improve the analysis of organisational learning concepts within the organisations and the ability to design of relevant solutions.
Students will be expected to write an essay in response to the question below.
Question
Discuss any five (5) key barriers to organisational learning in organisations in your home country. Explain in detail, any four (4) strategies that that can be implemented to improve organisational learning.
Support your discussion on the barriers with examples drawn from your home country.
Submission Date:
Week 8 (online submission via Turnitin)
Total Mark & Weighting:
30 marks (30%)
Students are advised that
any submissions past the due date without an approved extension or without approved extenuating circumstances incurs a 5% penalty per calendar day
,
calculated from the total mark e.g. a task marked out of 35 will incur a 1.75 mark penalty per calendar day.
General notes for assignment
Assignments should usually incorporate a formal introduction, main points and conclusion, and will be fully referenced including a reference list.
The word count for the assessment is 1500 words (+/- 10%)
Marks will be deducted for failure to adhere to the word count
General Notes for Referencing
References are assessed for their quality. You should draw on quality academic sources, such as books, chapters from edited books, journals etc. Your textbook can be used as a reference, but not the lecturer notes. We want to see evidence that you can conduct your own research. Also, in order to help markers, determine students’ understanding of the work they cite, all in-text references (not just direct quotes) must include the specific page number/s if shown in the original.
Work that includes sources that are not properly referenced according to the “Harvard Referencing Workbook” will be penalized.
Marking Guide (Rubric):
Your assessment would be marked based on the following marking guideline.
Total marks – 30
Criteria
Mark
Fail
Pass
Credit
Distinction
High Distinction
Criterion 1
Extent to which the question is answered
5
Below 2.5
2.5 – 3.0
3.5 – 3.8
3.9 – 4.4
4.5 and above
Not all parts of the question are addressed
Individual parts of the questions addressed in a reasonable way with limited integration
Individual parts of the questions addressed soundly with some degree of integration
Individual parts of the questions addressed strongly with strong integration
Questions addressed strongly in all dimensions with a high level of integration
Criterion 2
Understanding of the theoretical concepts
10
Below 5.0
5.0 – 6.0
7.0 – 7.6
7.8 – 8.8
9 and above
Understanding of the individual organizational learning concepts not demonstrated
Understanding of the individual organizational learning concepts is satisfactory
Understanding of the individual organizational learning concepts is sound
Understanding of the individual organizational learning concepts is detailed
Understanding of the individual organizational learning concepts is highly integrated
Criterion 3
Extent of critical analysis
10
Below 5.0
5.0 – 6.0
7.0 – 7.6
7.8 – 8.8
9 and above
Lack of critical analysis, with no application of theoretical concepts
Limited critical analysis, with limited application of theoretical concepts
Some critical analysis, with theoretical concepts applied
Competent level of critical analysis, with correct application of theoretical concepts
Clear and thorough critical analysis, with adequate application of theoretical concepts
Criterion 4
Structure and references
– Coherence and organization
– APA format
5
Below 2.5
2.5 – 3.0
3.5 – 3.8
3.9 – 4.4
4.5 and above
An unfocussed, incoherent essay, characterized by disorganization and/or missing required sections.
References are inconsistent with required format; a notable number of errors present.
A somewhat focused, slightly incoherent essay, characterized by some disorganization and/or missing required sections.
References are inconsistent with required format; a number of errors present.
A somewhat coherent and organized essay and including most required sections.
Referencing format is adhered to throughout the essay, with some errors present.
A clear and coherent essay, organized and including all required sections.
Referencing format is rigorously adhered to throughout the essay, with very few errors present.
An exceptionally clear, concise and coherent essay, critically organized and including all required sections.
Referencing format is rigorously adhered to throughout the essay, with no errors present.

Philosophy and Human Nature Unit 2 1. Describe Plato’s concept of human nature and his theory of the world. 2. What does Plato see as the main source of human discord? 3. What does Plato prescribe to alleviate human discord? 4. Explain what you see as the main strengths and weaknesses of Plato’s theory? 6. Briefly describe Aristotle’s concept of the world and of human nature. 7. What does Aristotle see as the main source of human discord? 8. What does he prescribe in order to reduce human discord? 9. Describe two ways in which Aristotle’s thought differs from Plato’s? 10. What do you see as the strengths and weaknesses of Aristotle’s thought? 11. Today, there is much debate regarding the role of United States government in education. Using mandated government funding for special education (or ‘inclusion’) as an example, which of the two philosophers, Plato or Aristotle, do you think would provide the best arguments for this mandate, and which would be best in arguing against it. Explain their arguments. Which do you agree with most and why? Please answer these question in 3 paragraph essay.
Attachments:
3059959_1_instruction.docx

You will be given two videos to analyze (See link to the 2 videos at the bottom) Prepare an introduction that identifies the major social institutions (family, education, and religion) in society and why they are important. Describe each video and the social institutions it addresses (family and education) With each video, you will apply the three sociological perspectives of functionalist, conflict and interactionist perspective. Here, you will: 1. Identify any relevant models of power structure or political behavior which might be influential. 2. Explain the functionalist, conflict, and interactionist perspectives on the family and educational institution. Which perspective does each film use to discuss the institution? Explain specific examples from the videos from the viewpoint of the designated theoretical approach. 3. Provide a conclusion that summarizes the main ideas of the essay and describes how these institutions have influenced you. APA guideline should be followed. Video
Attachments:
3059892_1_instruction.docx

Scenario
Refer to the article published by The Sydney Morning Herald on 1 April 2019, titled ‘Gerry Harvey
defends how retailer values $2.9bn property empire’. A copy of the article has been appended to the
‘Assessment 2’ folder under Assessment Zone in vUWS.
(1) The article states that ‘Listed companies are required under accounting standards to revalue their
assets regularly.’ Do you believe this would be the case if a listed company chooses to adopt the
cost method of revaluation? Provide justifications for your answer.
(2) The article mentions that ‘experts have criticised the lack of transparency’ around Harvey
Norman’s valuation processes. How could a lack of transparency breach the qualitative
characteristics of the Conceptual Framework?
(3) In the article, there is a statement that ‘under Australian accounting rules, valuation movements
contribute to or detract from a company’s declared profit’. Explain, using examples, how noncurrent
asset valuation movements ‘contribute to or detract from’ declared profit.
(4) The article describes that Dean Paatsch, from Ownership Matters, is concerned about ‘Harvey
Norman’s reliance on director valuations’ for property revaluations. Is reliance on directors’
valuations a valid concern? Provide justifications for your answer.
Allocate around 850 words for Question 1 and 550 words for each of the remaining three questions. To
support your arguments, you have to use:
• Authoritative, relevant references,
• Relevant accounting standards, and
• The AASB Framework.
Attachments:
3059808_1_Assignment-Question—Q2-2019—Final.pdf
3059808_2_Gerry-Harvey-defends-how-retailer-values–2.pdf

In anticipation of the institution of these proceedings, Respondents have submitted Offers
of Settlement (the “Offers”) which the Commission has determined to accept. Solely for the
purpose of these proceedings and any other proceedings brought by or on behalf of the
Commission, or to which the Commission is a party, and without admitting or denying the findings
herein, except as to the Commission’s jurisdiction over them and the subject matter of these
proceedings, which are admitted, and except as provided herein in Section IV, Respondents
consent to the entry of this Order Instituting Public Administrative Proceedings Pursuant to Section
4C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 102(e) of the Commission’s Rules Of
Practice, Making Findings and Imposing Remedial Sanctions (the “Order”), as set forth below.
III.
On the basis of this Order and Respondents’ Offers, the Commission finds3
that:
A. SUMMARY
1. This matter concerns improper professional conduct by Bertuglia, Green, and
Nagdimov during an audit performed by BDO USA, LLP (“BDO”) for AmTrust Financial
Services, Inc. (“AmTrust” or the “Company”). In 2013, AmTrust engaged BDO to conduct an
integrated audit of the Company’s 2013 consolidated annual financial statements and internal
control over financial reporting (“ICFR”) in accordance with Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) standards. For the engagement, BDO staffed Bertuglia as the
engagement partner, Green as the engagement quality review partner, and Nagdimov as a senior
manager.
Attachments:
3046863_1_ACC-705-SEC-ruling.pdf

Case
In the fall of 2017, Hussein Choucri, the manager of HC Securities and Investment (HC
Securities), faced a dilemma. The Egyptian-based boutique financial services company he
founded in 1996 was facing limited growth, and Egypt’s recent economic slowdown was
restricting the company’s potential. Mr Choucri saw higher growth potential outside of the
Middle East and North Africa (MENA), but this was a relatively new area for HC Securities.
Choucri discussed possible expansion by the company with his son, Ali, studying at
Northeastern University. After consideration, they elected to target the Asia Pacific (APAC)
as the most compelling region for expansion of the investment banking division. Trade and
investments between these two regions were growing, and after reviewing preliminary
research prepared by his son, Mr Choucri saw particular promise in Hong Kong and
Singapore. This left him with a decision: continue operating locally, as the company was still
profitable, or expand to one of the two Asian locations where the risks and potential growth
were both higher. If HC Securities moved quickly, it could enjoy first-mover advantages,
being one of the only mid-tier Middle Eastern investment banks brokering transactions in
Asia. However, the expansion would require time and money. Mr Choucri wanted to make
sure his choice was well-justified. Ali, being familiar with, and having worked at HC
Securities for a number of years, volunteered to assist in any international initiative.
Attachments:
3046846_1_Final-Exam—Tri-1-2019—GSBS6001-Managing-Under-Uncertainty.pdf
3046846_2_Case-Study-Exam—Tri-1–2019.pdf
3046846_3_Exam-Briefing—T1-2019-MOV-v1.1.pptx

The aim of this unit is to examine the processes, functions and strategies required by
organisations to acquire goods, services and equipment from other organisations. The unit
covers three broad dimensions of the procurement function within organisations. Firstly, the
unit familiarises you with the purchasing processes employed by organisations in both the
public and private sectors. Secondly, the unit discusses strategic decision-making in a range
of procurement-related issues that have a direct impact on how an organisation operates.
Thirdly, the unit examines the supplier-related tasks of purchasing professionals, including
supplier selection and management.
Intended Learning Outcomes
On completion of this unit you should be able to:
1. Investigate the procurement process in a range of applications including public,
capital, project, retail, commodity, services and facilities procurement.
2. Demonstrate critical thinking and knowledge of strategic purchasing issues including,
but not limited to, outsourcing, risk management, innovation, quality control and
supply chain management.
3. Apply contemporary business principles and concepts to supplier selection and
management.
The above learning outcomes are assessed through assignments, a quiz, and the final
examination.
Attachments:
2969295_1_Untitled.pdf
2969295_2_M6-Purchasing-Logistics-and-Supply-Chain-Management2.pptx
2969295_3_M5-Sourcing-Strategies-and-Supplier-Selection2.pptx
2969295_4_JNB357-9780538476423-7-assignmnet-three.PDF

3. REQUIREMENTS MANAGEMENT
3.1 Traditional Owner/s of the land on which CQ University campuses are located
(1 mark).
The Senior Supplier has asked whether there can be a single key stakeholder representing the Traditional Owners of the land on which the relevant Central Queensland Campuses are located. The Project Executive suggests that they will need more than one key stakeholder representing the Traditional Owners of the land on which Central Queensland Campuses are located.
Describe which approach is most appropriate and provide a brief explanation justifying your answer.
3.2 Opening statement style
(1 mark)
The Project Board has asked that the respective campus leaders open the event on their campus and ask your advice regarding which statement should be used when opening each event. The Board are not sure if it should be a Welcome to Country or an Acknowledgement of Country. The campus leaders are not of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander descent.
State which of the two opening statement styles ‘Welcome to Country’ or ‘Acknowledgement of Country’ is appropriate for the campus leaders to use and provide a brief explanation justifying your answer.
3.3 Requirements gathering for each event
(1 mark)
The Senior Supplier representing the event management company engaged to design the event program and host the event, provides the following information to the project board:
One of their event program designers previously developed an event program for the local Maori community group. The designer is confident they could utilise the same event program and modify the content by researching the language, customs and protocols online. They suggest by using desktop research only will save both time and money, as there would be no need to contact anyone outside the current project team.
State whether the suggestion of using the previous event program and desktop research method for the NAIDOC week events is an appropriate method of requirements gathering? Briefly explain your answer.
3.4 Requirements traceability
(1 mark)
As multiple campuses will be involved in the project, the project board has requested requirements be tracked centrally. What document is used to track or ‘trace’ requirements throughout the project life cycle?
Attachments:
2969286_1_2019-t1-PPMP20008-Ass2-Template-v02-.docx
2969286_2_Assessment-2-Specifications-PPMP20008-2019-T1-v01.docx
2969286_3_WhatsApp-Image-2019-05-02-at-8.27.35-PM.jpeg

Assignment Objectives
The purpose of the assignment is to facilitate student development in:
• Understanding the pathophysiology of an acute cardiac condition;
• Nursing care and management of the patient with the cardiac condition;
• Health promotion for the patient with the cardiac condition.
Case Study
Mr Papas is a 54-year-old Greek man who presents to the emergency department with central chest pain. He has no cardiac history and has never been to hospital. There is no known family history of cardiac disease or myocardial infarction. Mr Papas states he has associated symptoms of nausea, diaphoresis, and pain radiating to both shoulders and down his left arm. When asked to rate his pain, he states his pain score is 10 out of 10. When questioned about his social history, he states he smokes cigarettes (15 per day), drinks socially, works as an IT consultant in an office, and does very little exercise.
Mr Papas is pale and clammy. He is afebrile, with a blood pressure of 106/62 mm Hg, a regular pulse of 70bpm, a respiratory rate of 20 breaths/min, and an oxygen saturation of 96% while breathing room air. An ECG reveals an acute ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). His Troponin I result is 2.4. The plan for Mr Papas is to have thrombolysis medication and be admitted to the cardiac ward for monitoring.
Mr Papas is anxious and feels guilty about his lifestyle that he considers has contributed to his admission today.
1. Risk Factors and Health Promotion
What are the factors that may have contributed to Mr Papas’s myocardial infarction? Outline how you would approach Mr Papas regarding these and what health promotion information and referral’s you would provide to him.
(500 words- this is a guide)
2. Pathophysiology
Briefly describe the pathophysiology behind both a ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) in your own words (in the way you would explain it to a family member) and identify how it differs from a non-STEMI.
(400 words- this is a guide)
3. Homeostatic Mechanisms
Attachments:
2969281_1_NMIH202-Assessment-2–Case-study-2019.docx

Assessment: This Part 1 of the assignment is worth 15 % of the final mark for this subject.
Due Date: Wednesday 8th May, at 10.00 am
Delays caused by computer downtime cannot be accepted as a valid reason for a late submission
without penalty. Students must plan their work to allow for both scheduled and unscheduled
downtime. Penalties are applied to late assignments (accepted up to 5 days after the due date
only). See the university policy for details.
Individual Assignment: This is an individual assignment. You are not permitted to work as a
group when writing this assignment.
Copying, Plagiarism: Plagiarism is the submission of somebody else’s work in a manner that
gives the impression that the work is your own. The Department of Computer Science and Information
Technology treats academic misconduct seriously. When it is detected, penalties are
strictly imposed. Refer to the unit guide for further information and strategies you can use to
avoid a charge of academic misconduct. All submissions will be electronically checked for plagiarism.
Objectives: The general aims of this assignment are:
• To analyze a problem in an object-oriented manner, and then design and implement an
object-oriented solution that conforms to given specifications
• To practise using inheritance in Java
• To practise file input and output in Java
• To make implementations more robust through mechanisms such as exception handling.
Submission Details: Instructions on how to submit electronic copies of your source code files
from your latcs8 account and a marking scheme overview are given at the end. If you have not
been able to complete a program that compiles and executes containing all functionality, then
you should submit a program that compiles and executes with as much functionality as you have
completed. (You may comment out code that does not compile.)
Deployment Platform: While you are free to develop the code for this assignment on any
operating system, your solution must run on the latcs8 system. We should be able to compile
your classes with the simple command javac *.java, and execute your programs with a simple
command, e.g. java TestConstructors.
Attachments:
2969275_1_19-S1-Assignment-Part1-Handout.pdf
2969275_2_supportingfilesbriefing.zip