Tag: Financial Accounting

  • [Solved] BUS 400 Project Guidelines and Rubric

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-management) ## BUS 400 Project Guidelines and Rubric ### Overview A sustainable, competitive advantage aligns with an organization’s strengths and long-term strategy, which is where the Blue Ocean Strategy excels. By crea…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-management)

    ## BUS 400 Project Guidelines and Rubric

    ### Overview

    A sustainable, competitive advantage aligns with an organization’s strengths and long-term strategy, which is where the Blue Ocean Strategy excels. By creating uncontested market spaces and delivering innovative value, organizations can minimize competition and uncover new opportunities for growth.

    Through a comprehensive analysis of risks and opportunities, businesses identify gaps, address unmet customer needs, and align with emerging trends like sustainability or technology. Defending these decisions with clear evidence and measurable outcomes builds stakeholder confidence and drives strategic buy-in.

    By leveraging the Blue Ocean Strategy, organizations can foster innovation, adapt to challenges, and achieve sustainable growth, ensuring continued success in evolving markets.

    ### Scenario

    This is your opportunity to prove why your new product or service deserves funding. You’ve done the research, and you understand that the investment you’re seeking could be a game-changer for the company—driving revenue and profitability and strategically setting the organization apart from its competitors.

    Now, as you prepare to address questions from senior management, you’ve developed a comprehensive checklist with key talking points to cover all aspects of the project.

    – Research and market analysis
    – Feasibility of the idea using the Business Model Canvas (BMC)
    – Project scope, including a timeline
    – Risk mitigation strategies
    – Alignment with diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) and corporate social responsibility (CSR) goals
    – A 24-month pro forma that outlines financial projections

    In this project, you will demonstrate your mastery of driving business opportunities based on the following competencies:

    – Determine how an organization gains a competitive advantage
    – Determine organizational risk and growth opportunities in order to develop a strategic plan
    – Defend business decisions in support of an organization’s strategic plan

    ### Directions

    Create a pitch for funding. In this pitch, you will have to convince senior management to greenlight the new product or service.

    Specifically, you must address the following **rubric criteria**:

    01. **Value Proposition**: Describe the company’s existing value proposition in the market.

    1. Describe the selected company’s main product or service.
    2. Discuss the company’s overall strategic plan.
    02. **Competitive Advantage**: Describe the competitive advantage the company will gain by funding the project.

    1. Describe how you discovered an opportunity to do something better than your competitors.
    2. Determine how the new product or service shifts the value proposition of the company.
    03. **Risks and Opportunities**: Establish the risks and growth opportunities of the company.

    1. Determine if the new product or service could disrupt the industry now.
    2. Identify the risks associated with the development of this new product or service.
    04. **Growth Opportunities**: Describe the areas of potential growth for the company.

    1. Identify the growth opportunities within the company.
    2. Explain how the competitive advantage allows for growth.
    05. **Distinguish as a New Product or Innovation**: Distinguish the new product or service as an innovation or improvement on an existing product or service.

    1. Determine if the product or service fits within the capabilities of the company.

    Note: A company’s SWOT analysis or 10-K is an indicator of whether the new product or service could be feasible.
    2. Explain how the new product or service adds to the portfolio of the company.
    06. **Target Segment**: Describe the targeted segment.

    1. Identify the target customer.
    2. Explain your blue ocean strategy.

    Note: The new market is identified here.
    07. **Speculate Sales**: Speculate on the projected sales.

    1. Justify your product or service by the numbers; discuss your projected revenue gain.

    Note: It MUST have an ROI that justifies the project for investors and senior management.
    2. Explain the risks associated with projected sales.
    08. **Speculate Profitability**: Speculate on the profitability of your proposed product or service.

    1. Determine if the project is profitable.

    Note: In this pitch for funding, senior management must know that the project, based on market research, is speculated to be profitable. Use the company’s latest income statement to project how the company’s profitability will be affected. Look to other companies in the marketplace with products or services similar to the one you are proposing as a basis for your projections. Note: These numbers are purely speculative.
    2. Determine the impact on the functional areas of the business (accounting, marketing, sales, and so on).
    09. **CSR Plan**: Outline the plan to service the community or customers who purchase the product or service.

    1. Discuss how the idea demonstrates corporate social responsibility (CSR).
    2. Identify what the company has invested in as it relates to the communities they serve.
    3. Discuss how a good CSR plan helps the company gain competitive advantage.
    10. **DEI Plan**: Summarize how the project will include a variety of perspectives to gain a better unique value proposition.

    1. Determine if the company has a corporate culture built on DEI.
    2. Discuss how the project’s DEI plan fits into the company’s overall strategic plan.

    ### What to Submit

    To complete this project, you must submit your funding pitch script. Your script should be written as if you were delivering the speech. It must be a 7- to 8-page Microsoft Word document using double spacing, one-inch margins, and 12-point Times New Roman font. Sources should be cited according to APA style.

    ### Project Rubric

    CriteriaExceeds Expectations (100%)Meets Expectations (85%)Partially Meets Expectations (55%)Does Not Meet Expectations (0%)Value **Value Proposition: Main Product or Service** Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative mannerDescribes the selected company’s main product or serviceShows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include descriptions that are lacking in detail or inaccurateDoes not attempt criterion3 **Value Proposition: Overall Strategic Plan** Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative mannerDiscusses the company’s overall strategic planShows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include incomplete or inaccurate descriptions of strategic planDoes not attempt criterion5 **Competitive Advantage: Opportunity Discovery** Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative mannerDescribes how you discovered an opportunity to do something better than someone elseShows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include descriptions that are cursory or incompleteDoes not attempt criterion4 **Competitive Advantage: Value Proposition Shift** Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative mannerDetermines how the new product or service shifts the value proposition of the companyShows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include inaccurate or cursory explanationsDoes not attempt criterion5 **Risks and Opportunities: Industry Disruption** Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative mannerDetermines if the new product or service could disrupt the industry nowShows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include discussion that is incomplete or inaccurateDoes not attempt criterion4 **Risks and Opportunities: Risks Associated With Development** Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative mannerIdentifies the risks associated with the development of this new product or serviceShows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include risks that are inaccurate or lacking in detailDoes not attempt criterion4 **Growth Opportunities: Company Growth Opportunities** Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative mannerIdentifies the growth opportunities within the companyShows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include growth opportunities that are inaccurate or lacking in detailDoes not attempt criterion5 **Growth Opportunities: Competitive Advantage** Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative mannerExplains how the competitive advantage allows for growthShows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include explanations that are lacking in detail or inaccurateDoes not attempt criterion5 **Distinguish as a New Product or Innovation: Fit Within the Capabilities of the Company** Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative mannerDetermines if the product or service suggested fits within the capabilities of the companyShows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include discussion that is inaccurate or cursoryDoes not attempt criterion4 **Distinguish as a New Product or Innovation: Overall Portfolio Addition** Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative mannerExplains how the new product or service adds to the portfolio of the companyShows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include explanations that are fragmentary or incompleteDoes not attempt criterion4 **Target Segment: The Customer** Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative mannerIdentifies the target customerShows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include discussion of target customer that is lacking in detail or inaccurateDoes not attempt criterion5 **Target Segment: Blue Ocean Strategy** Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative mannerExplains blue ocean strategyShows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include explanations that are cursory or inaccurateDoes not attempt criterion5 **Speculate Sales: Projected Revenue Gain** Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative mannerJustifies your product or service by the numbers: discusses your projected revenue gainShows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include justifications that are incomplete or inaccurateDoes not attempt criterion4 **Speculate Sales: Risks Associated With Sales** Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative mannerExplains the risks associated with projected salesShows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include explanations that are not associated with projected sales or fragmentaryDoes not attempt criterion5 **Speculate Profitability: Is the Project Profitable?** Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative mannerDetermines if the project is profitableShows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include determinations that are incomplete or lacking in detailDoes not attempt criterion4 **Speculate Profitability: Impact on Functional Areas** Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative mannerDetermines the impact to the functional areas of the businessShows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include discussion that lacks detail or does not assess the impact on functional areas of businessDoes not attempt criterion5 **CSR Plan: The CSR Data** Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative mannerDiscusses how the idea demonstrates corporate social responsibility (CSR)Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include discussions that don’t address CSR or are lacking in detailDoes not attempt criterion4 **CSR Plan: Community Investment** Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative mannerIdentifies what the company has invested in as it relates to the communities they serveShows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include explanations that are lacking in detail or don’t relate to the community being servedDoes not attempt criterion4 **CSR Plan: Increasing the Competitive Advantage of the Company** Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative mannerDiscusses how a good CSR plan helps the company gain competitive advantageShows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include discussions that are lacking in detail or are not targeted toward helping to gain competitive advantageDoes not attempt criterion3 **DEI Plan: The Culture** Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative mannerDetermines if the company has a corporate culture built on DEIShows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include descriptions that are lacking in detail or cursoryDoes not attempt criterion3 **DEI Plan: Overall Strategic Plan** Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative mannerDiscusses how the project DEI plan fits into the company’s overall strategic planShows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include discussion that is missing key components or is inaccurateDoes not attempt criterion5 **Clear Communication** Exceeds expectations with an intentional use of language that promotes a thorough understandingConsistently and effectively communicates in an organized way to a specific audienceShows progress toward meeting expectations, but communication is inconsistent or ineffective in a way that negatively impacts understandingShows no evidence of consistent, effective, or organized communication5 **Citations and Attributions** Uses citations for ideas requiring attribution, with few or no minor errorsUses citations for ideas requiring attribution, with consistent minor errorsUses citations for ideas requiring attribution, with major errorsDoes not use citations for ideas requiring attribution5 **Total:** 100%

    – [\
    \
    KirklandFreshConnectasaStrategicSubscription_Ortiz.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/kirklandfreshconnectasastrategicsubscription-ortiz-docx-10500637 "KirklandFreshConnectasaStrategicSubscription_Ortiz.docx")
    – [\
    \
    24-MonthProFormaFinancialProjection._Ortiz.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/24-monthproformafinancialprojection-ortiz-docx-10500639 "24-MonthProFormaFinancialProjection._Ortiz.docx")
    – [\
    \
    CreatingaBlueOceanStrategyThroughKirklandFreshConnect_Ortiz.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/creatingablueoceanstrategythroughkirklandfreshconnect-ortiz-docx "CreatingaBlueOceanStrategyThroughKirklandFreshConnect_Ortiz.docx")

  • [Solved] discussion

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Accounting homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-accounting) **files (2)** – ## DiscussionAssignmentInstructions9.docx – Screenshot2026-02-175.38.44PM.png **## DiscussionAssignmentInstructions9.docx** BUSI 301 **Discussion Assignment Instructions** Overview Discussions …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Accounting homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-accounting)

    **files (2)**

    – ## DiscussionAssignmentInstructions9.docx

    – Screenshot2026-02-175.38.44PM.png

    **## DiscussionAssignmentInstructions9.docx**

    BUSI 301

    **Discussion Assignment Instructions**

    Overview

    Discussions bring dialogue and communication into our learning experience. Unlike so much of the unsubstantiated opinion we see in the public square and social media, these discussions provide a space for in-depth analysis and application of the topics in our Learn readings and presentations. Each discussion is a mini-research paper developing conclusions that are supported by scholarly sources and critical analysis. The replies are expressly assigned to respond to classmates with different conclusions or analysis and require civil discourse to broaden understanding of the topics.

    Instructions

    Each discussion consists of 2 parts:

    1) a thread of at least 300 words in response to the provided prompt and

    2) replies of at least 150 words each to 2 classmates’ threads.

    Each thread and each reply must reference at least 2 scholarly sources other than the course textbook, cited in current APA format (including both in-text citations and a reference list). You must also support each thread and reply with thoughtful analysis (considering assumptions, analyzing implications, and comparing/contrasting concepts) and Biblical worldview integration.

    Well-developed, complete worldview analysis of the situation requires more than simply adding a Bible verse at the end of the post. Each thread and each reply must include at least 1 verse from Scripture, quoted and applied as an integral part of the discussion of the applicable issues in the context of a Biblical worldview.

    For each reply, read the threads posted by your classmates and reply to 2 threads that presented a different conclusion than your thread. Note that comments such as “I like what you said,” “that is a good comment,” and “I disagree with your comment” do not constitute complete replies. Rather, state reasons that support your conclusions with additional and/or alternate research/ideas/thoughts.

    Submit each thread by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Thursday of the assigned Module: Week. Submit two replies by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Monday of the same Module: Week.

    **Screenshot2026-02-175.38.44PM.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2026-02-175-38-44pm-png-10500953)

    **Screenshot2026-02-175.38.44PM.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2026-02-175-38-44pm-png-10500953)

    **## DiscussionAssignmentInstructions9.docx**

    BUSI 301

    **Discussion Assignment Instructions**

    Overview

    Discussions bring dialogue and communication into our learning experience. Unlike so much of the unsubstantiated opinion we see in the public square and social media, these discussions provide a space for in-depth analysis and application of the topics in our Learn readings and presentations. Each discussion is a mini-research paper developing conclusions that are supported by scholarly sources and critical analysis. The replies are expressly assigned to respond to classmates with different conclusions or analysis and require civil discourse to broaden understanding of the topics.

    Instructions

    Each discussion consists of 2 parts:

    1) a thread of at least 300 words in response to the provided prompt and

    2) replies of at least 150 words each to 2 classmates’ threads.

    Each thread and each reply must reference at least 2 scholarly sources other than the course textbook, cited in current APA format (including both in-text citations and a reference list). You must also support each thread and reply with thoughtful analysis (considering assumptions, analyzing implications, and comparing/contrasting concepts) and Biblical worldview integration.

    Well-developed, complete worldview analysis of the situation requires more than simply adding a Bible verse at the end of the post. Each thread and each reply must include at least 1 verse from Scripture, quoted and applied as an integral part of the discussion of the applicable issues in the context of a Biblical worldview.

    For each reply, read the threads posted by your classmates and reply to 2 threads that presented a different conclusion than your thread. Note that comments such as “I like what you said,” “that is a good comment,” and “I disagree with your comment” do not constitute complete replies. Rather, state reasons that support your conclusions with additional and/or alternate research/ideas/thoughts.

    Submit each thread by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Thursday of the assigned Module: Week. Submit two replies by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Monday of the same Module: Week.

    **Screenshot2026-02-175.38.44PM.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2026-02-175-38-44pm-png-10500953)

    **## DiscussionAssignmentInstructions9.docx**

    BUSI 301

    **Discussion Assignment Instructions**

    Overview

    Discussions bring dialogue and communication into our learning experience. Unlike so much of the unsubstantiated opinion we see in the public square and social media, these discussions provide a space for in-depth analysis and application of the topics in our Learn readings and presentations. Each discussion is a mini-research paper developing conclusions that are supported by scholarly sources and critical analysis. The replies are expressly assigned to respond to classmates with different conclusions or analysis and require civil discourse to broaden understanding of the topics.

    Instructions

    Each discussion consists of 2 parts:

    1) a thread of at least 300 words in response to the provided prompt and

    2) replies of at least 150 words each to 2 classmates’ threads.

    Each thread and each reply must reference at least 2 scholarly sources other than the course textbook, cited in current APA format (including both in-text citations and a reference list). You must also support each thread and reply with thoughtful analysis (considering assumptions, analyzing implications, and comparing/contrasting concepts) and Biblical worldview integration.

    Well-developed, complete worldview analysis of the situation requires more than simply adding a Bible verse at the end of the post. Each thread and each reply must include at least 1 verse from Scripture, quoted and applied as an integral part of the discussion of the applicable issues in the context of a Biblical worldview.

    For each reply, read the threads posted by your classmates and reply to 2 threads that presented a different conclusion than your thread. Note that comments such as “I like what you said,” “that is a good comment,” and “I disagree with your comment” do not constitute complete replies. Rather, state reasons that support your conclusions with additional and/or alternate research/ideas/thoughts.

    Submit each thread by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Thursday of the assigned Module: Week. Submit two replies by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Monday of the same Module: Week.

    **Screenshot2026-02-175.38.44PM.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2026-02-175-38-44pm-png-10500953)

  • [Solved] Alternative Energy

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-management) Over the past two centuries, fossil fuels have helped us build the complex industrialized societies we enjoy today. Yet our supplies of conventional fossil fuels are declining. We have responded to this challe…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-management)

    Over the past two centuries, fossil fuels have helped us build the complex industrialized societies we enjoy today. Yet our supplies of conventional fossil fuels are declining. We have responded to this challenge by expanding our search for new sources of fossil fuels. This will eventually lead to us paying ever-higher economic, health, and environmental costs.

    Are there alternatives to reaching further for fossil fuels to meet our increasing demands for energy?

    If so, what are they?

  • [Solved] discussion

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Accounting homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-accounting) **files (2)** – ## DiscussionAssignmentInstructions8.docx – Screenshot2026-02-175.26.47PM.png **## DiscussionAssignmentInstructions8.docx** BUSI 301 **Discussion Assignment Instructions** Overview Discussions …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Accounting homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-accounting)

    **files (2)**

    – ## DiscussionAssignmentInstructions8.docx

    – Screenshot2026-02-175.26.47PM.png

    **## DiscussionAssignmentInstructions8.docx**

    BUSI 301

    **Discussion Assignment Instructions**

    Overview

    Discussions bring dialogue and communication into our learning experience. Unlike so much of the unsubstantiated opinion we see in the public square and social media, these discussions provide a space for in-depth analysis and application of the topics in our Learn readings and presentations. Each discussion is a mini-research paper developing conclusions that are supported by scholarly sources and critical analysis. The replies are expressly assigned to respond to classmates with different conclusions or analysis and require civil discourse to broaden understanding of the topics.

    Instructions

    Each discussion consists of 2 parts:

    1) a thread of at least 300 words in response to the provided prompt and

    2) replies of at least 150 words each to 2 classmates’ threads.

    Each thread and each reply must reference at least 2 scholarly sources other than the course textbook, cited in current APA format (including both in-text citations and a reference list). You must also support each thread and reply with thoughtful analysis (considering assumptions, analyzing implications, and comparing/contrasting concepts) and Biblical worldview integration.

    Well-developed, complete worldview analysis of the situation requires more than simply adding a Bible verse at the end of the post. Each thread and each reply must include at least 1 verse from Scripture, quoted and applied as an integral part of the discussion of the applicable issues in the context of a Biblical worldview.

    For each reply, read the threads posted by your classmates and reply to 2 threads that presented a different conclusion than your thread. Note that comments such as “I like what you said,” “that is a good comment,” and “I disagree with your comment” do not constitute complete replies. Rather, state reasons that support your conclusions with additional and/or alternate research/ideas/thoughts.

    Submit each thread by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Thursday of the assigned Module: Week. Submit two replies by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Monday of the same Module: Week.

    **Screenshot2026-02-175.26.47PM.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2026-02-175-26-47pm-png)

    **Screenshot2026-02-175.26.47PM.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2026-02-175-26-47pm-png)

    **## DiscussionAssignmentInstructions8.docx**

    BUSI 301

    **Discussion Assignment Instructions**

    Overview

    Discussions bring dialogue and communication into our learning experience. Unlike so much of the unsubstantiated opinion we see in the public square and social media, these discussions provide a space for in-depth analysis and application of the topics in our Learn readings and presentations. Each discussion is a mini-research paper developing conclusions that are supported by scholarly sources and critical analysis. The replies are expressly assigned to respond to classmates with different conclusions or analysis and require civil discourse to broaden understanding of the topics.

    Instructions

    Each discussion consists of 2 parts:

    1) a thread of at least 300 words in response to the provided prompt and

    2) replies of at least 150 words each to 2 classmates’ threads.

    Each thread and each reply must reference at least 2 scholarly sources other than the course textbook, cited in current APA format (including both in-text citations and a reference list). You must also support each thread and reply with thoughtful analysis (considering assumptions, analyzing implications, and comparing/contrasting concepts) and Biblical worldview integration.

    Well-developed, complete worldview analysis of the situation requires more than simply adding a Bible verse at the end of the post. Each thread and each reply must include at least 1 verse from Scripture, quoted and applied as an integral part of the discussion of the applicable issues in the context of a Biblical worldview.

    For each reply, read the threads posted by your classmates and reply to 2 threads that presented a different conclusion than your thread. Note that comments such as “I like what you said,” “that is a good comment,” and “I disagree with your comment” do not constitute complete replies. Rather, state reasons that support your conclusions with additional and/or alternate research/ideas/thoughts.

    Submit each thread by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Thursday of the assigned Module: Week. Submit two replies by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Monday of the same Module: Week.

    **Screenshot2026-02-175.26.47PM.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2026-02-175-26-47pm-png)

    **## DiscussionAssignmentInstructions8.docx**

    BUSI 301

    **Discussion Assignment Instructions**

    Overview

    Discussions bring dialogue and communication into our learning experience. Unlike so much of the unsubstantiated opinion we see in the public square and social media, these discussions provide a space for in-depth analysis and application of the topics in our Learn readings and presentations. Each discussion is a mini-research paper developing conclusions that are supported by scholarly sources and critical analysis. The replies are expressly assigned to respond to classmates with different conclusions or analysis and require civil discourse to broaden understanding of the topics.

    Instructions

    Each discussion consists of 2 parts:

    1) a thread of at least 300 words in response to the provided prompt and

    2) replies of at least 150 words each to 2 classmates’ threads.

    Each thread and each reply must reference at least 2 scholarly sources other than the course textbook, cited in current APA format (including both in-text citations and a reference list). You must also support each thread and reply with thoughtful analysis (considering assumptions, analyzing implications, and comparing/contrasting concepts) and Biblical worldview integration.

    Well-developed, complete worldview analysis of the situation requires more than simply adding a Bible verse at the end of the post. Each thread and each reply must include at least 1 verse from Scripture, quoted and applied as an integral part of the discussion of the applicable issues in the context of a Biblical worldview.

    For each reply, read the threads posted by your classmates and reply to 2 threads that presented a different conclusion than your thread. Note that comments such as “I like what you said,” “that is a good comment,” and “I disagree with your comment” do not constitute complete replies. Rather, state reasons that support your conclusions with additional and/or alternate research/ideas/thoughts.

    Submit each thread by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Thursday of the assigned Module: Week. Submit two replies by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Monday of the same Module: Week.

    **Screenshot2026-02-175.26.47PM.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2026-02-175-26-47pm-png)

  • [Solved] discussion convey

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Accounting homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-accounting) **files (2)** – ## DiscussionAssignmentInstructions10.docx – Screenshot2026-02-175.43.45PM.png **## DiscussionAssignmentInstructions10.docx** INDS 491 **Discussion Assignment Instructions** The discussions in …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Accounting homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-accounting)

    **files (2)**

    – ## DiscussionAssignmentInstructions10.docx

    – Screenshot2026-02-175.43.45PM.png

    **## DiscussionAssignmentInstructions10.docx**

    INDS 491

    **Discussion Assignment Instructions**

    The discussions in this course are meant to be collaborative learning experiences that foster a spirit of community and collegiality, but you must also view these as academic assignments with formal requirements.

    For these discussions, you are required to submit a thread in response to the provided prompt listed in the discussion. The thread is due by 11:59 pm (ET) on Thursday of the assigned Module: Week. Each thread must be at least 400 words and demonstrate course-related knowledge. In addition to the thread, you are required to reply to the thread of at least 2 classmates. Each reply must be at least 150 words and should be submitted by 11:59 pm (ET) on Monday of the assigned Module: Week. Before replying to a student with multiple replies, make sure all students have at least one dialogue partner for their original thread. If you don’t have something valuable to add to one thread, find another with which you can fully interact. Any sources used must be cited according to current APA formatting standards.

    **Screenshot2026-02-175.43.45PM.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2026-02-175-43-45pm-png)

    **Screenshot2026-02-175.43.45PM.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2026-02-175-43-45pm-png)

    **## DiscussionAssignmentInstructions10.docx**

    INDS 491

    **Discussion Assignment Instructions**

    The discussions in this course are meant to be collaborative learning experiences that foster a spirit of community and collegiality, but you must also view these as academic assignments with formal requirements.

    For these discussions, you are required to submit a thread in response to the provided prompt listed in the discussion. The thread is due by 11:59 pm (ET) on Thursday of the assigned Module: Week. Each thread must be at least 400 words and demonstrate course-related knowledge. In addition to the thread, you are required to reply to the thread of at least 2 classmates. Each reply must be at least 150 words and should be submitted by 11:59 pm (ET) on Monday of the assigned Module: Week. Before replying to a student with multiple replies, make sure all students have at least one dialogue partner for their original thread. If you don’t have something valuable to add to one thread, find another with which you can fully interact. Any sources used must be cited according to current APA formatting standards.

    **Screenshot2026-02-175.43.45PM.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2026-02-175-43-45pm-png)

    **## DiscussionAssignmentInstructions10.docx**

    INDS 491

    **Discussion Assignment Instructions**

    The discussions in this course are meant to be collaborative learning experiences that foster a spirit of community and collegiality, but you must also view these as academic assignments with formal requirements.

    For these discussions, you are required to submit a thread in response to the provided prompt listed in the discussion. The thread is due by 11:59 pm (ET) on Thursday of the assigned Module: Week. Each thread must be at least 400 words and demonstrate course-related knowledge. In addition to the thread, you are required to reply to the thread of at least 2 classmates. Each reply must be at least 150 words and should be submitted by 11:59 pm (ET) on Monday of the assigned Module: Week. Before replying to a student with multiple replies, make sure all students have at least one dialogue partner for their original thread. If you don’t have something valuable to add to one thread, find another with which you can fully interact. Any sources used must be cited according to current APA formatting standards.

    **Screenshot2026-02-175.43.45PM.png**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/screenshot2026-02-175-43-45pm-png)

  • [Solved] IDANY-ACCOUNTING

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Accounting homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-accounting) Gather references from the Accounting, STATISTA, and PROQUEST databases, all accessible in the Course Information and Resources folder under LIRN. Compose a 3 PAGES report outlining the principles of Manageria…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Accounting homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-accounting)

    Gather references from the Accounting, STATISTA, and PROQUEST databases, all accessible in the Course Information and Resources folder under LIRN.

    Compose a 3 PAGES report outlining the principles of Managerial Accounting relevant to your ideal job. This report will explore how these managerial accounting principles can influence your future career in management across any sector of your choice, such as services, manufacturing, sports, etc. For example, you might discuss how budgeting, forecasting, cost allocation methods, cost/benefit analysis, and break-even points will affect your responsibilities.

    Ensure that your report adheres to APA formatting guidelines and follow the evaluation rubric for this project.

    DUE DATE FEBRUARY 17, 2026

    NO MORE THAN 10% PLAGIARISM ALLOWED THIS ASSIGNMENT WILL BE SUBMITTED VIA TURNITIN

    3 PAGES TO MEET REQUIREMENTS

    REFERENCES WITHIN THE PAST 5 YEARS IN APA FORMAT WITH IN-TEXT CITATIONS AND DOI#

    – [\
    \
    RUBRIC.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/rubric-pdf-10500399 "RUBRIC.pdf")

  • [Solved] Fabulous Footwear Case analysis

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Operations Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-operations-management) Please see attached questions to address in 800 words and reference book is Daft: Organization Theory and Design, 13th Edition.support your assertions with at least 5 scholarly peer-revie…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Operations Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-operations-management)

    Please see attached  questions to address in 800 words and reference book is Daft: Organization Theory and Design, 13th Edition.support your assertions with at least 5 scholarly peer-reviewed sources in the current APA format. The post and must contain biblical integration. The Bible must be cited to support your assertions regarding biblical integration and be included in references in addition to the number of required scholarly peer-reviewed sources.

    – [\
    \
    Casestudy-FabulousFootwear.pdf](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/casestudy-fabulousfootwear-pdf "Casestudy-FabulousFootwear.pdf")

  • [Solved] week 7

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Operations Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-operations-management) corporate ethical dilemma or fraud case of their choice **files (2)** – ## week7df.docx – ## Week7-Assignment_FinalCoursePaper-MGMT618B002Winter2026-APEI.pdf **## week7df.docx** Students…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Operations Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-operations-management)

    corporate ethical dilemma or fraud case of their choice

    **files (2)**

    – ## week7df.docx

    – ## Week7-Assignment_FinalCoursePaper-MGMT618B002Winter2026-APEI.pdf

    **## week7df.docx**

    Students will write a comprehensive 12–15 page paper analyzing a major corporate ethical dilemma or fraud case of their choice. The paper should include identification of ethical issues, stakeholders, analysis using at least two ethical frameworks, evaluation of leadership and organizational culture impact, and recommendations for ethical strategies. Describe the impact of technological, structural, cultural, human, and environmental factors in the dilemma.

    **Requirements:** Minimum 10 peer-reviewed sources, APA format, include executive summary and references.

    **Note**: Please feel free to use an Artificial Intelligence (AI) platform for research assistance. As always, review the information for accuracy prior to submitting your paper and remember to cite the AI platform that was used.

    **Be sure to review the following prior to submitting your assignment:**

    · We strive for academic integrity in all aspects of education, and you are expected to uphold these standards when creating and submitting your discussion.  View the
    [Standards of Student Conduct [webpage]](https://www.apu.apus.edu/student-handbook/university-policies-and-code-of-conduct/apus-student-code-of-conduct/standards-of-student-conduct/) for more information on what that means at APUS.

    · Assignment Rubric

    · If you do not see the rubric,
    **select Course Tools in the blue horizontal navigation bar and then Assignments**. Select the appropriate assignment, and the rubric will be located near the bottom of the page.

    ·
    [Print a Rubric Preview [webpage]](https://community.d2l.com/brightspace/kb/articles/5376-review-feedback-and-rubrics)

    **## Week7-Assignment_FinalCoursePaper-MGMT618B002Winter2026-APEI.pdf**

    MGMT Assignment GRADING RUBRIC (August

    2021)
    Course: MGMT618 B002 Winter 2026

    Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning
    Did not
    attempt

    Criterion
    Score

    Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning
    Did not
    attempt

    Criterion
    Score

    Organizati

    on of

    Ideas/For

    mat

    / 2525 points

    Student

    thoroughly

    understands

    and excels in

    explaining all

    major points.

    An original,

    unique,

    and/or imag-

    inative ap-

    proach to

    overall ideas,

    concepts,

    and findings

    is presented.

    Overall for-

    mat of as-

    signment in-

    cludes an ap-

    propriate in-

    troduction,

    well- devel-

    oped para-

    graphs, and a

    conclusion.

    Finished as-

    signment

    demon-

    strates

    student’s

    ability to

    plan and or-

    ganize re-

    search in a

    logical se-

    quence.

    Student uses

    21.25 points

    Student ex-

    plains the

    majority of

    points and

    concepts in

    the assign-

    ment.

    Learner

    demon-

    strates a

    good skill

    level in for-

    matting and

    organizing

    material in

    assignment.

    Student

    presents an

    above aver-

    age level of

    prepared-

    ness, with a

    few format-

    ting errors.

    Student doc-

    uments re-

    quired num-

    ber of out-

    side

    references.

    18.75 points

    Student ap-

    plies some

    points and

    concepts in-

    correctly.

    Student uses

    a variety of

    formatting

    styles, with

    some incon-

    sistencies

    throughout

    the paper.

    Assignment

    does not

    have a con-

    tinuous pat-

    tern of logi-

    cal sequenc-

    ing.

    Student has

    fewer than

    required ref-

    erences and

    does not use

    them to vali-

    date ideas.

    16.25 points

    Student has

    numerous

    formatting

    errors and a

    lack of orga-

    nization.

    Student

    presents an

    incomplete

    attempt to

    provide link-

    ages or ex-

    planation of

    key terms.

    There is little

    to no at-

    tempt to

    document

    outside ref-

    erences as

    required.

    0 points

    No

    submission.

    Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning
    Did not
    attempt

    Criterion
    Score

    Content/S

    ubject

    Knowledg

    e

    / 25

    required out-

    side refer-

    ences

    effectively.

    25 points

    Student

    demon-

    strates profi-

    cient com-

    mand of the

    subject mat-

    ter in the as-

    signment.

    Assignment

    shows an im-

    pressive

    level of

    depth of

    student’s

    ability to re-

    late course

    content to

    practical ex-

    amples and

    applications.

    Student pro-

    vides com-

    prehensive

    analysis of

    details, facts,

    and concepts

    in a logical

    sequence

    21.25 points

    Student ex-

    hibits above

    average us-

    age of sub-

    ject matter

    in assign-

    ment.

    Student pro-

    vides above

    average abil-

    ity in relating

    course con-

    tent in exam-

    ples given.

    Details and

    facts pre-

    sented pro-

    vide an ade-

    quate pre-

    sentation of

    student’s

    current level

    of subject

    matter

    knowledge.

    18.75 points

    The assign-

    ment reveals

    that the stu-

    dent has a

    general, fun-

    damental un-

    derstanding

    of the course

    material.

    There are ar-

    eas of some

    confusion in

    the linkages

    provided be-

    tween facts

    and support-

    ing state-

    ments.

    Student ex-

    plains con-

    cepts, but

    explains

    them in a

    manner that

    may leave

    the reader

    confused in

    some areas.

    16.25 points

    Student tries

    to explain

    some con-

    cepts, but

    overlooks

    critical de-

    tails.

    Assignment

    appears

    vague or in-

    complete in

    various seg-

    ments.

    Student

    presents

    concepts in

    isolation, and

    does not

    perceive to

    have a logi-

    cal sequenc-

    ing of ideas.

    0 points

    No

    submission.

    Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning
    Did not
    attempt

    Criterion
    Score

    Mechanic

    s/APA

    format-

    ting

    / 2525 points

    Student

    demon-

    strates an

    excellent

    command of

    grammar, as

    well as

    presents re-

    search in a

    clear and

    concise writ-

    ing style.

    Presents a

    thorough,

    extensive

    understand-

    ing of word

    usage.

    Assignment

    is error-free

    and

    reflects

    student’s

    ability to

    prepare a

    high-quality

    academic as-

    signment

    complete

    with proper

    APA

    formatting.

    21.25 points

    Student pro-

    vides an ef-

    fective dis-

    play of good

    writing and

    grammar.

    Assignment

    reflects

    student’s

    ability to se-

    lect

    appropriate

    word usage

    and present

    an above av-

    erage pre-

    sentation of

    the given

    topic or is-

    sue.

    Assignment

    appears to

    be well writ-

    ten with no

    more than 3-

    5 errors.

    Student uses

    proper APA

    formatting

    with only mi-

    nor errors.

    18.75 points

    Student's

    submission

    reflects basic

    writing and

    grammar, but

    includes

    more than 5

    errors. Key

    terms and

    concepts are

    somewhat

    vague and

    not com-

    pletely ex-

    plained.

    Student uses

    only basic

    vocabulary in

    assignment.

    Student’s

    writing has

    several APA

    errors and

    lacks proper

    citation.

    16.25 points

    Student’s

    writing style

    is weak and

    needs im-

    provement,

    and numer-

    ous errors

    are present.

    Assignment

    lacks clarity,

    consistency,

    and gram-

    matical cor-

    rectness.

    Basic sen-

    tence struc-

    ture is often

    confusing

    and not

    punctuated

    properly.

    Student pays

    little or no

    attention to

    APA details

    and there are

    missing

    citations.

    0 points

    No

    submission.

    Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning
    Did not
    attempt

    Criterion
    Score

    Critical

    Thinking

    Skills

    / 2525 points

    Student

    demon-

    strates a

    higher-level

    of critical

    thinking ap-

    propriate for

    300-400

    level cour-

    ses. Learner

    provides a

    strategic ap-

    proach in

    presenting

    examples of

    problem

    solving or

    critical think-

    ing, while

    drawing logi-

    cal conclu-

    sions which

    are not im-

    mediately

    obvious.

    Student pro-

    vides well-

    supported

    ideas and re-

    flection with

    a variety of

    current

    and/or world

    views in the

    assignment.

    Student

    presents a

    21.25 points

    Student ex-

    hibits a good

    command of

    critical think-

    ing skills in

    the presen-

    tation of ma-

    terial and

    supporting

    statements.

    Assignment

    demon-

    strates the

    student’s

    above aver-

    age use of

    relating con-

    cepts by us-

    ing a variety

    of sources.

    Overall, stu-

    dent pro-

    vides ade-

    quate con-

    clusions and

    explains

    them appro-

    priately

    throughout

    the paper.

    18.75 points

    Student

    takes a com-

    mon, con-

    ventional ap-

    proach in

    guiding the

    reader

    through vari-

    ous linkages

    and connec-

    tions pre-

    sented in as-

    signment.

    However,

    student

    presents a

    limited per-

    spective on

    key concepts

    throughout

    assignment.

    Student ap-

    pears to

    have prob-

    lems apply-

    ing informa-

    tion in a

    problem-

    solving

    manner.

    16.25 points

    Student

    demon-

    strates be-

    ginning un-

    derstanding

    of key con-

    cepts, but

    overlooks

    critical de-

    tails. Learner

    is unable to

    apply infor-

    mation in a

    problem-

    solving fash-

    ion. Student

    presents

    confusing

    statements

    and facts

    within the

    assignment.

    There is little

    to no evi-

    dence of

    critical think-

    ing skills.

    0 points

    No

    submission

    Total / 100

    Overall Score

    Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning
    Did not
    attempt

    Criterion
    Score

    genuine in-

    tellectual de-

    velopment of

    ideas

    throughout

    assignment.

    Exemplary
    90 points minimum

    Accomplished
    80 points minimum

    Developing
    70 points minimum

    Beginning
    60 points minimum

    Did not attempt
    0 points minimum

    **## Week7-Assignment_FinalCoursePaper-MGMT618B002Winter2026-APEI.pdf**

    MGMT Assignment GRADING RUBRIC (August

    2021)
    Course: MGMT618 B002 Winter 2026

    Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning
    Did not
    attempt

    Criterion
    Score

    Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning
    Did not
    attempt

    Criterion
    Score

    Organizati

    on of

    Ideas/For

    mat

    / 2525 points

    Student

    thoroughly

    understands

    and excels in

    explaining all

    major points.

    An original,

    unique,

    and/or imag-

    inative ap-

    proach to

    overall ideas,

    concepts,

    and findings

    is presented.

    Overall for-

    mat of as-

    signment in-

    cludes an ap-

    propriate in-

    troduction,

    well- devel-

    oped para-

    graphs, and a

    conclusion.

    Finished as-

    signment

    demon-

    strates

    student’s

    ability to

    plan and or-

    ganize re-

    search in a

    logical se-

    quence.

    Student uses

    21.25 points

    Student ex-

    plains the

    majority of

    points and

    concepts in

    the assign-

    ment.

    Learner

    demon-

    strates a

    good skill

    level in for-

    matting and

    organizing

    material in

    assignment.

    Student

    presents an

    above aver-

    age level of

    prepared-

    ness, with a

    few format-

    ting errors.

    Student doc-

    uments re-

    quired num-

    ber of out-

    side

    references.

    18.75 points

    Student ap-

    plies some

    points and

    concepts in-

    correctly.

    Student uses

    a variety of

    formatting

    styles, with

    some incon-

    sistencies

    throughout

    the paper.

    Assignment

    does not

    have a con-

    tinuous pat-

    tern of logi-

    cal sequenc-

    ing.

    Student has

    fewer than

    required ref-

    erences and

    does not use

    them to vali-

    date ideas.

    16.25 points

    Student has

    numerous

    formatting

    errors and a

    lack of orga-

    nization.

    Student

    presents an

    incomplete

    attempt to

    provide link-

    ages or ex-

    planation of

    key terms.

    There is little

    to no at-

    tempt to

    document

    outside ref-

    erences as

    required.

    0 points

    No

    submission.

    Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning
    Did not
    attempt

    Criterion
    Score

    Content/S

    ubject

    Knowledg

    e

    / 25

    required out-

    side refer-

    ences

    effectively.

    25 points

    Student

    demon-

    strates profi-

    cient com-

    mand of the

    subject mat-

    ter in the as-

    signment.

    Assignment

    shows an im-

    pressive

    level of

    depth of

    student’s

    ability to re-

    late course

    content to

    practical ex-

    amples and

    applications.

    Student pro-

    vides com-

    prehensive

    analysis of

    details, facts,

    and concepts

    in a logical

    sequence

    21.25 points

    Student ex-

    hibits above

    average us-

    age of sub-

    ject matter

    in assign-

    ment.

    Student pro-

    vides above

    average abil-

    ity in relating

    course con-

    tent in exam-

    ples given.

    Details and

    facts pre-

    sented pro-

    vide an ade-

    quate pre-

    sentation of

    student’s

    current level

    of subject

    matter

    knowledge.

    18.75 points

    The assign-

    ment reveals

    that the stu-

    dent has a

    general, fun-

    damental un-

    derstanding

    of the course

    material.

    There are ar-

    eas of some

    confusion in

    the linkages

    provided be-

    tween facts

    and support-

    ing state-

    ments.

    Student ex-

    plains con-

    cepts, but

    explains

    them in a

    manner that

    may leave

    the reader

    confused in

    some areas.

    16.25 points

    Student tries

    to explain

    some con-

    cepts, but

    overlooks

    critical de-

    tails.

    Assignment

    appears

    vague or in-

    complete in

    various seg-

    ments.

    Student

    presents

    concepts in

    isolation, and

    does not

    perceive to

    have a logi-

    cal sequenc-

    ing of ideas.

    0 points

    No

    submission.

    Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning
    Did not
    attempt

    Criterion
    Score

    Mechanic

    s/APA

    format-

    ting

    / 2525 points

    Student

    demon-

    strates an

    excellent

    command of

    grammar, as

    well as

    presents re-

    search in a

    clear and

    concise writ-

    ing style.

    Presents a

    thorough,

    extensive

    understand-

    ing of word

    usage.

    Assignment

    is error-free

    and

    reflects

    student’s

    ability to

    prepare a

    high-quality

    academic as-

    signment

    complete

    with proper

    APA

    formatting.

    21.25 points

    Student pro-

    vides an ef-

    fective dis-

    play of good

    writing and

    grammar.

    Assignment

    reflects

    student’s

    ability to se-

    lect

    appropriate

    word usage

    and present

    an above av-

    erage pre-

    sentation of

    the given

    topic or is-

    sue.

    Assignment

    appears to

    be well writ-

    ten with no

    more than 3-

    5 errors.

    Student uses

    proper APA

    formatting

    with only mi-

    nor errors.

    18.75 points

    Student's

    submission

    reflects basic

    writing and

    grammar, but

    includes

    more than 5

    errors. Key

    terms and

    concepts are

    somewhat

    vague and

    not com-

    pletely ex-

    plained.

    Student uses

    only basic

    vocabulary in

    assignment.

    Student’s

    writing has

    several APA

    errors and

    lacks proper

    citation.

    16.25 points

    Student’s

    writing style

    is weak and

    needs im-

    provement,

    and numer-

    ous errors

    are present.

    Assignment

    lacks clarity,

    consistency,

    and gram-

    matical cor-

    rectness.

    Basic sen-

    tence struc-

    ture is often

    confusing

    and not

    punctuated

    properly.

    Student pays

    little or no

    attention to

    APA details

    and there are

    missing

    citations.

    0 points

    No

    submission.

    Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning
    Did not
    attempt

    Criterion
    Score

    Critical

    Thinking

    Skills

    / 2525 points

    Student

    demon-

    strates a

    higher-level

    of critical

    thinking ap-

    propriate for

    300-400

    level cour-

    ses. Learner

    provides a

    strategic ap-

    proach in

    presenting

    examples of

    problem

    solving or

    critical think-

    ing, while

    drawing logi-

    cal conclu-

    sions which

    are not im-

    mediately

    obvious.

    Student pro-

    vides well-

    supported

    ideas and re-

    flection with

    a variety of

    current

    and/or world

    views in the

    assignment.

    Student

    presents a

    21.25 points

    Student ex-

    hibits a good

    command of

    critical think-

    ing skills in

    the presen-

    tation of ma-

    terial and

    supporting

    statements.

    Assignment

    demon-

    strates the

    student’s

    above aver-

    age use of

    relating con-

    cepts by us-

    ing a variety

    of sources.

    Overall, stu-

    dent pro-

    vides ade-

    quate con-

    clusions and

    explains

    them appro-

    priately

    throughout

    the paper.

    18.75 points

    Student

    takes a com-

    mon, con-

    ventional ap-

    proach in

    guiding the

    reader

    through vari-

    ous linkages

    and connec-

    tions pre-

    sented in as-

    signment.

    However,

    student

    presents a

    limited per-

    spective on

    key concepts

    throughout

    assignment.

    Student ap-

    pears to

    have prob-

    lems apply-

    ing informa-

    tion in a

    problem-

    solving

    manner.

    16.25 points

    Student

    demon-

    strates be-

    ginning un-

    derstanding

    of key con-

    cepts, but

    overlooks

    critical de-

    tails. Learner

    is unable to

    apply infor-

    mation in a

    problem-

    solving fash-

    ion. Student

    presents

    confusing

    statements

    and facts

    within the

    assignment.

    There is little

    to no evi-

    dence of

    critical think-

    ing skills.

    0 points

    No

    submission

    Total / 100

    Overall Score

    Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning
    Did not
    attempt

    Criterion
    Score

    genuine in-

    tellectual de-

    velopment of

    ideas

    throughout

    assignment.

    Exemplary
    90 points minimum

    Accomplished
    80 points minimum

    Developing
    70 points minimum

    Beginning
    60 points minimum

    Did not attempt
    0 points minimum

    **## week7df.docx**

    Students will write a comprehensive 12–15 page paper analyzing a major corporate ethical dilemma or fraud case of their choice. The paper should include identification of ethical issues, stakeholders, analysis using at least two ethical frameworks, evaluation of leadership and organizational culture impact, and recommendations for ethical strategies. Describe the impact of technological, structural, cultural, human, and environmental factors in the dilemma.

    **Requirements:** Minimum 10 peer-reviewed sources, APA format, include executive summary and references.

    **Note**: Please feel free to use an Artificial Intelligence (AI) platform for research assistance. As always, review the information for accuracy prior to submitting your paper and remember to cite the AI platform that was used.

    **Be sure to review the following prior to submitting your assignment:**

    · We strive for academic integrity in all aspects of education, and you are expected to uphold these standards when creating and submitting your discussion.  View the
    [Standards of Student Conduct [webpage]](https://www.apu.apus.edu/student-handbook/university-policies-and-code-of-conduct/apus-student-code-of-conduct/standards-of-student-conduct/) for more information on what that means at APUS.

    · Assignment Rubric

    · If you do not see the rubric,
    **select Course Tools in the blue horizontal navigation bar and then Assignments**. Select the appropriate assignment, and the rubric will be located near the bottom of the page.

    ·
    [Print a Rubric Preview [webpage]](https://community.d2l.com/brightspace/kb/articles/5376-review-feedback-and-rubrics)

    **## Week7-Assignment_FinalCoursePaper-MGMT618B002Winter2026-APEI.pdf**

    MGMT Assignment GRADING RUBRIC (August

    2021)
    Course: MGMT618 B002 Winter 2026

    Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning
    Did not
    attempt

    Criterion
    Score

    Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning
    Did not
    attempt

    Criterion
    Score

    Organizati

    on of

    Ideas/For

    mat

    / 2525 points

    Student

    thoroughly

    understands

    and excels in

    explaining all

    major points.

    An original,

    unique,

    and/or imag-

    inative ap-

    proach to

    overall ideas,

    concepts,

    and findings

    is presented.

    Overall for-

    mat of as-

    signment in-

    cludes an ap-

    propriate in-

    troduction,

    well- devel-

    oped para-

    graphs, and a

    conclusion.

    Finished as-

    signment

    demon-

    strates

    student’s

    ability to

    plan and or-

    ganize re-

    search in a

    logical se-

    quence.

    Student uses

    21.25 points

    Student ex-

    plains the

    majority of

    points and

    concepts in

    the assign-

    ment.

    Learner

    demon-

    strates a

    good skill

    level in for-

    matting and

    organizing

    material in

    assignment.

    Student

    presents an

    above aver-

    age level of

    prepared-

    ness, with a

    few format-

    ting errors.

    Student doc-

    uments re-

    quired num-

    ber of out-

    side

    references.

    18.75 points

    Student ap-

    plies some

    points and

    concepts in-

    correctly.

    Student uses

    a variety of

    formatting

    styles, with

    some incon-

    sistencies

    throughout

    the paper.

    Assignment

    does not

    have a con-

    tinuous pat-

    tern of logi-

    cal sequenc-

    ing.

    Student has

    fewer than

    required ref-

    erences and

    does not use

    them to vali-

    date ideas.

    16.25 points

    Student has

    numerous

    formatting

    errors and a

    lack of orga-

    nization.

    Student

    presents an

    incomplete

    attempt to

    provide link-

    ages or ex-

    planation of

    key terms.

    There is little

    to no at-

    tempt to

    document

    outside ref-

    erences as

    required.

    0 points

    No

    submission.

    Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning
    Did not
    attempt

    Criterion
    Score

    Content/S

    ubject

    Knowledg

    e

    / 25

    required out-

    side refer-

    ences

    effectively.

    25 points

    Student

    demon-

    strates profi-

    cient com-

    mand of the

    subject mat-

    ter in the as-

    signment.

    Assignment

    shows an im-

    pressive

    level of

    depth of

    student’s

    ability to re-

    late course

    content to

    practical ex-

    amples and

    applications.

    Student pro-

    vides com-

    prehensive

    analysis of

    details, facts,

    and concepts

    in a logical

    sequence

    21.25 points

    Student ex-

    hibits above

    average us-

    age of sub-

    ject matter

    in assign-

    ment.

    Student pro-

    vides above

    average abil-

    ity in relating

    course con-

    tent in exam-

    ples given.

    Details and

    facts pre-

    sented pro-

    vide an ade-

    quate pre-

    sentation of

    student’s

    current level

    of subject

    matter

    knowledge.

    18.75 points

    The assign-

    ment reveals

    that the stu-

    dent has a

    general, fun-

    damental un-

    derstanding

    of the course

    material.

    There are ar-

    eas of some

    confusion in

    the linkages

    provided be-

    tween facts

    and support-

    ing state-

    ments.

    Student ex-

    plains con-

    cepts, but

    explains

    them in a

    manner that

    may leave

    the reader

    confused in

    some areas.

    16.25 points

    Student tries

    to explain

    some con-

    cepts, but

    overlooks

    critical de-

    tails.

    Assignment

    appears

    vague or in-

    complete in

    various seg-

    ments.

    Student

    presents

    concepts in

    isolation, and

    does not

    perceive to

    have a logi-

    cal sequenc-

    ing of ideas.

    0 points

    No

    submission.

    Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning
    Did not
    attempt

    Criterion
    Score

    Mechanic

    s/APA

    format-

    ting

    / 2525 points

    Student

    demon-

    strates an

    excellent

    command of

    grammar, as

    well as

    presents re-

    search in a

    clear and

    concise writ-

    ing style.

    Presents a

    thorough,

    extensive

    understand-

    ing of word

    usage.

    Assignment

    is error-free

    and

    reflects

    student’s

    ability to

    prepare a

    high-quality

    academic as-

    signment

    complete

    with proper

    APA

    formatting.

    21.25 points

    Student pro-

    vides an ef-

    fective dis-

    play of good

    writing and

    grammar.

    Assignment

    reflects

    student’s

    ability to se-

    lect

    appropriate

    word usage

    and present

    an above av-

    erage pre-

    sentation of

    the given

    topic or is-

    sue.

    Assignment

    appears to

    be well writ-

    ten with no

    more than 3-

    5 errors.

    Student uses

    proper APA

    formatting

    with only mi-

    nor errors.

    18.75 points

    Student's

    submission

    reflects basic

    writing and

    grammar, but

    includes

    more than 5

    errors. Key

    terms and

    concepts are

    somewhat

    vague and

    not com-

    pletely ex-

    plained.

    Student uses

    only basic

    vocabulary in

    assignment.

    Student’s

    writing has

    several APA

    errors and

    lacks proper

    citation.

    16.25 points

    Student’s

    writing style

    is weak and

    needs im-

    provement,

    and numer-

    ous errors

    are present.

    Assignment

    lacks clarity,

    consistency,

    and gram-

    matical cor-

    rectness.

    Basic sen-

    tence struc-

    ture is often

    confusing

    and not

    punctuated

    properly.

    Student pays

    little or no

    attention to

    APA details

    and there are

    missing

    citations.

    0 points

    No

    submission.

    Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning
    Did not
    attempt

    Criterion
    Score

    Critical

    Thinking

    Skills

    / 2525 points

    Student

    demon-

    strates a

    higher-level

    of critical

    thinking ap-

    propriate for

    300-400

    level cour-

    ses. Learner

    provides a

    strategic ap-

    proach in

    presenting

    examples of

    problem

    solving or

    critical think-

    ing, while

    drawing logi-

    cal conclu-

    sions which

    are not im-

    mediately

    obvious.

    Student pro-

    vides well-

    supported

    ideas and re-

    flection with

    a variety of

    current

    and/or world

    views in the

    assignment.

    Student

    presents a

    21.25 points

    Student ex-

    hibits a good

    command of

    critical think-

    ing skills in

    the presen-

    tation of ma-

    terial and

    supporting

    statements.

    Assignment

    demon-

    strates the

    student’s

    above aver-

    age use of

    relating con-

    cepts by us-

    ing a variety

    of sources.

    Overall, stu-

    dent pro-

    vides ade-

    quate con-

    clusions and

    explains

    them appro-

    priately

    throughout

    the paper.

    18.75 points

    Student

    takes a com-

    mon, con-

    ventional ap-

    proach in

    guiding the

    reader

    through vari-

    ous linkages

    and connec-

    tions pre-

    sented in as-

    signment.

    However,

    student

    presents a

    limited per-

    spective on

    key concepts

    throughout

    assignment.

    Student ap-

    pears to

    have prob-

    lems apply-

    ing informa-

    tion in a

    problem-

    solving

    manner.

    16.25 points

    Student

    demon-

    strates be-

    ginning un-

    derstanding

    of key con-

    cepts, but

    overlooks

    critical de-

    tails. Learner

    is unable to

    apply infor-

    mation in a

    problem-

    solving fash-

    ion. Student

    presents

    confusing

    statements

    and facts

    within the

    assignment.

    There is little

    to no evi-

    dence of

    critical think-

    ing skills.

    0 points

    No

    submission

    Total / 100

    Overall Score

    Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning
    Did not
    attempt

    Criterion
    Score

    genuine in-

    tellectual de-

    velopment of

    ideas

    throughout

    assignment.

    Exemplary
    90 points minimum

    Accomplished
    80 points minimum

    Developing
    70 points minimum

    Beginning
    60 points minimum

    Did not attempt
    0 points minimum

    **## week7df.docx**

    Students will write a comprehensive 12–15 page paper analyzing a major corporate ethical dilemma or fraud case of their choice. The paper should include identification of ethical issues, stakeholders, analysis using at least two ethical frameworks, evaluation of leadership and organizational culture impact, and recommendations for ethical strategies. Describe the impact of technological, structural, cultural, human, and environmental factors in the dilemma.

    **Requirements:** Minimum 10 peer-reviewed sources, APA format, include executive summary and references.

    **Note**: Please feel free to use an Artificial Intelligence (AI) platform for research assistance. As always, review the information for accuracy prior to submitting your paper and remember to cite the AI platform that was used.

    **Be sure to review the following prior to submitting your assignment:**

    · We strive for academic integrity in all aspects of education, and you are expected to uphold these standards when creating and submitting your discussion.  View the
    [Standards of Student Conduct [webpage]](https://www.apu.apus.edu/student-handbook/university-policies-and-code-of-conduct/apus-student-code-of-conduct/standards-of-student-conduct/) for more information on what that means at APUS.

    · Assignment Rubric

    · If you do not see the rubric,
    **select Course Tools in the blue horizontal navigation bar and then Assignments**. Select the appropriate assignment, and the rubric will be located near the bottom of the page.

    ·
    [Print a Rubric Preview [webpage]](https://community.d2l.com/brightspace/kb/articles/5376-review-feedback-and-rubrics)

    **## Week7-Assignment_FinalCoursePaper-MGMT618B002Winter2026-APEI.pdf**

    MGMT Assignment GRADING RUBRIC (August

    2021)
    Course: MGMT618 B002 Winter 2026

    Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning
    Did not
    attempt

    Criterion
    Score

    Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning
    Did not
    attempt

    Criterion
    Score

    Organizati

    on of

    Ideas/For

    mat

    / 2525 points

    Student

    thoroughly

    understands

    and excels in

    explaining all

    major points.

    An original,

    unique,

    and/or imag-

    inative ap-

    proach to

    overall ideas,

    concepts,

    and findings

    is presented.

    Overall for-

    mat of as-

    signment in-

    cludes an ap-

    propriate in-

    troduction,

    well- devel-

    oped para-

    graphs, and a

    conclusion.

    Finished as-

    signment

    demon-

    strates

    student’s

    ability to

    plan and or-

    ganize re-

    search in a

    logical se-

    quence.

    Student uses

    21.25 points

    Student ex-

    plains the

    majority of

    points and

    concepts in

    the assign-

    ment.

    Learner

    demon-

    strates a

    good skill

    level in for-

    matting and

    organizing

    material in

    assignment.

    Student

    presents an

    above aver-

    age level of

    prepared-

    ness, with a

    few format-

    ting errors.

    Student doc-

    uments re-

    quired num-

    ber of out-

    side

    references.

    18.75 points

    Student ap-

    plies some

    points and

    concepts in-

    correctly.

    Student uses

    a variety of

    formatting

    styles, with

    some incon-

    sistencies

    throughout

    the paper.

    Assignment

    does not

    have a con-

    tinuous pat-

    tern of logi-

    cal sequenc-

    ing.

    Student has

    fewer than

    required ref-

    erences and

    does not use

    them to vali-

    date ideas.

    16.25 points

    Student has

    numerous

    formatting

    errors and a

    lack of orga-

    nization.

    Student

    presents an

    incomplete

    attempt to

    provide link-

    ages or ex-

    planation of

    key terms.

    There is little

    to no at-

    tempt to

    document

    outside ref-

    erences as

    required.

    0 points

    No

    submission.

    Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning
    Did not
    attempt

    Criterion
    Score

    Content/S

    ubject

    Knowledg

    e

    / 25

    required out-

    side refer-

    ences

    effectively.

    25 points

    Student

    demon-

    strates profi-

    cient com-

    mand of the

    subject mat-

    ter in the as-

    signment.

    Assignment

    shows an im-

    pressive

    level of

    depth of

    student’s

    ability to re-

    late course

    content to

    practical ex-

    amples and

    applications.

    Student pro-

    vides com-

    prehensive

    analysis of

    details, facts,

    and concepts

    in a logical

    sequence

    21.25 points

    Student ex-

    hibits above

    average us-

    age of sub-

    ject matter

    in assign-

    ment.

    Student pro-

    vides above

    average abil-

    ity in relating

    course con-

    tent in exam-

    ples given.

    Details and

    facts pre-

    sented pro-

    vide an ade-

    quate pre-

    sentation of

    student’s

    current level

    of subject

    matter

    knowledge.

    18.75 points

    The assign-

    ment reveals

    that the stu-

    dent has a

    general, fun-

    damental un-

    derstanding

    of the course

    material.

    There are ar-

    eas of some

    confusion in

    the linkages

    provided be-

    tween facts

    and support-

    ing state-

    ments.

    Student ex-

    plains con-

    cepts, but

    explains

    them in a

    manner that

    may leave

    the reader

    confused in

    some areas.

    16.25 points

    Student tries

    to explain

    some con-

    cepts, but

    overlooks

    critical de-

    tails.

    Assignment

    appears

    vague or in-

    complete in

    various seg-

    ments.

    Student

    presents

    concepts in

    isolation, and

    does not

    perceive to

    have a logi-

    cal sequenc-

    ing of ideas.

    0 points

    No

    submission.

    Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning
    Did not
    attempt

    Criterion
    Score

    Mechanic

    s/APA

    format-

    ting

    / 2525 points

    Student

    demon-

    strates an

    excellent

    command of

    grammar, as

    well as

    presents re-

    search in a

    clear and

    concise writ-

    ing style.

    Presents a

    thorough,

    extensive

    understand-

    ing of word

    usage.

    Assignment

    is error-free

    and

    reflects

    student’s

    ability to

    prepare a

    high-quality

    academic as-

    signment

    complete

    with proper

    APA

    formatting.

    21.25 points

    Student pro-

    vides an ef-

    fective dis-

    play of good

    writing and

    grammar.

    Assignment

    reflects

    student’s

    ability to se-

    lect

    appropriate

    word usage

    and present

    an above av-

    erage pre-

    sentation of

    the given

    topic or is-

    sue.

    Assignment

    appears to

    be well writ-

    ten with no

    more than 3-

    5 errors.

    Student uses

    proper APA

    formatting

    with only mi-

    nor errors.

    18.75 points

    Student's

    submission

    reflects basic

    writing and

    grammar, but

    includes

    more than 5

    errors. Key

    terms and

    concepts are

    somewhat

    vague and

    not com-

    pletely ex-

    plained.

    Student uses

    only basic

    vocabulary in

    assignment.

    Student’s

    writing has

    several APA

    errors and

    lacks proper

    citation.

    16.25 points

    Student’s

    writing style

    is weak and

    needs im-

    provement,

    and numer-

    ous errors

    are present.

    Assignment

    lacks clarity,

    consistency,

    and gram-

    matical cor-

    rectness.

    Basic sen-

    tence struc-

    ture is often

    confusing

    and not

    punctuated

    properly.

    Student pays

    little or no

    attention to

    APA details

    and there are

    missing

    citations.

    0 points

    No

    submission.

    Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning
    Did not
    attempt

    Criterion
    Score

    Critical

    Thinking

    Skills

    / 2525 points

    Student

    demon-

    strates a

    higher-level

    of critical

    thinking ap-

    propriate for

    300-400

    level cour-

    ses. Learner

    provides a

    strategic ap-

    proach in

    presenting

    examples of

    problem

    solving or

    critical think-

    ing, while

    drawing logi-

    cal conclu-

    sions which

    are not im-

    mediately

    obvious.

    Student pro-

    vides well-

    supported

    ideas and re-

    flection with

    a variety of

    current

    and/or world

    views in the

    assignment.

    Student

    presents a

    21.25 points

    Student ex-

    hibits a good

    command of

    critical think-

    ing skills in

    the presen-

    tation of ma-

    terial and

    supporting

    statements.

    Assignment

    demon-

    strates the

    student’s

    above aver-

    age use of

    relating con-

    cepts by us-

    ing a variety

    of sources.

    Overall, stu-

    dent pro-

    vides ade-

    quate con-

    clusions and

    explains

    them appro-

    priately

    throughout

    the paper.

    18.75 points

    Student

    takes a com-

    mon, con-

    ventional ap-

    proach in

    guiding the

    reader

    through vari-

    ous linkages

    and connec-

    tions pre-

    sented in as-

    signment.

    However,

    student

    presents a

    limited per-

    spective on

    key concepts

    throughout

    assignment.

    Student ap-

    pears to

    have prob-

    lems apply-

    ing informa-

    tion in a

    problem-

    solving

    manner.

    16.25 points

    Student

    demon-

    strates be-

    ginning un-

    derstanding

    of key con-

    cepts, but

    overlooks

    critical de-

    tails. Learner

    is unable to

    apply infor-

    mation in a

    problem-

    solving fash-

    ion. Student

    presents

    confusing

    statements

    and facts

    within the

    assignment.

    There is little

    to no evi-

    dence of

    critical think-

    ing skills.

    0 points

    No

    submission

    Total / 100

    Overall Score

    Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning
    Did not
    attempt

    Criterion
    Score

    genuine in-

    tellectual de-

    velopment of

    ideas

    throughout

    assignment.

    Exemplary
    90 points minimum

    Accomplished
    80 points minimum

    Developing
    70 points minimum

    Beginning
    60 points minimum

    Did not attempt
    0 points minimum

  • [Solved] BUSINESS( NO PLAGARISM A+ WORK, ON TIME)

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-management) Discussion Assignment **files (1)** – ## week7600FINAL.docx **## week7600FINAL.docx** Week 7 Assignment: Final Project Signature Assignment: This assignment aligns with all course COs. Recommendation: Print co…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-management)

    Discussion Assignment

    **files (1)**

    – ## week7600FINAL.docx

    **## week7600FINAL.docx**

    Week 7 Assignment: Final Project

    Signature Assignment: This assignment aligns with all course COs.

    Recommendation: Print complete Assignment to fully read and reference in preparing your paper! Paper outline is included.

    Prompt:

    Background

    For your final project, you are creating your own hypothetical scenario within the following parameters and applying the concepts covered this term.

    The INDUSTRY:

    First, select one of the following industries for this project and research the use of AI in this industry. (This has been covered in the Lessons also.)

    Agriculture

    Transportation

    Healthcare

    Finance

    Aerospace

    Education

    The COMPANY:

    Now, for this project,

    Create a hypothetical U.S. private for-profit civilian company of 200+ employees that is in business in the industry you have selected. The company is a C-corporation owned by multiple unrelated shareholders.

    Give your company a name.

    You might research current businesses in the industry for ideas, but the assignment is to create a hypothetical company.

    You are the VP of Innovation of this company.

    The AI:

    Next:

    Imagine a new AI application that might help productivity, ensure the business' continuity, streamline efficiency, and thus free up time in tasks that humans now perform in the company.

    This can be a potential AI app you completely dream up, or it can be a new one just being released on the market that you find in your research.

    Identify which of the six (6) AI subfields is the primary AI type (see Week 2 Lesson) of this new AI. There are potential new apps in a variety of areas to consider for any industry now or in the future. To help your ideas for creative research for this paper, you could look at—for example—AI assistance in such areas as AI-robotics, wearables, financial applications, cybersecurity, safety, product upgrades, customer support, medical diagnostics, supply chain, or transportation.

    **NOTE:

    You are looking at the company’s acquisition and use of a proposed new AI app that might support/enhance the company’s business in some way—NOT a new product for the company to develop, sell or manufacture. Here is an analogy: It's like acquiring a new broom to sweep the company's production floor, not a new broom to create, develop, market, and sell to customers for their floors. Your company is not creating or building the AI app. It is considering if it should acquire and use it in its business operations.

    The Assignment Task & Format Instructions and How to Organize Your Content :

    The following provides an outline for your paper’s content with explanatory notes about what you should cover for each section. Use the APA Sample Student Paper you have used in prior Assignments for a template of how to structure your paper.

    The Project:

    Having imagined and created the hypothetical company in the selected industry and a new AI application as directed above, here is the Project Assignment:

    You are the company's Vice President of Innovation.

    The CEO and Board have asked for your research and recommendation about the new AI app.

    Prepare an APA7 paper that covers the points outlined below for the hypothetical you have created.

    Write this paper in the third person—NOT using “I”, “we”, “us”, “you”, or “your”.

    Use the following outline for your content, which incorporates the Lesson material we have covered for the Course Objectives.

    **TIP: Embrace the hypothetical as if it were a real business and mentally immerse yourself as the VP advising the CEO and Board. Use the company name where appropriate. Use the AI app name where appropriate. In other words, make it real.

    **Paper Content Outline (Follow APA7 format as in prior Assignments):

    Suggested title: Executive Report on the [Company Name]’s Use of [Name of AI Application]

    Introduction

    In this section, you setting up your paper and introducing your topic. Describe the industry, the company, and the company’s particular business in the industry. Explain what the company does (examples: services, manufacturing, retail, etc.), which will in turn drive the type of AI application it would be using. Summarize how AI is transforming business and how a new AI app—named [app's name]—is being considered for the company. There are pros, cons, and other issues to consider in making the decision.

    How AI is Transforming Business

    In this section, summarize how AI has transformed business in general and how it is transforming, in particular, the company's industry that you selected for your topic. Briefly summarize how this transformation is affecting the company's need to advance.

    Proposed New AI Application

    In this section, explain the company’s interest in a new AI application named [app's name] and the potential benefit this AI might bring for the business. Describe the AI application of interest (as you have imagined it—as indicated in PROMPT/Background above).

    NOTE: This does not require a detailed technical description of the AI. What is the main AI subfield involved, and what will be the AI’s function for the company? For example: “[Name of the AI app] will use natural language processing to [description of app function]” OR “The company is considering a new AI wearable device called [name of the AI app] which machine learning [description of app function]." Then describe what it does. In these examples, it is not necessary to explain how NLP or ML itself works, only correctly align the subfield with the proposed AI app for the company. The function and benefit of the AI app for the company’s operations is the focus of your description. In short, what is the AI, and what does it do?

    Pros, Cons, and Benefits of AI

    In this section, first describe the general issues—pros and cons—of AI in business, including the benefits of AI. What are the benefits? What are the issues? Issues should include legal/ethical issues, change issues (e.g. work force disruption), concerns such as bias and corruption, and future implications. This provides a baseline for discussing the specific AI for your business.

    Evaluation of AI for a Business

    Summarize the pros, cons, and benefits for the (1) specific industry and company of your hypothetical, and (2) how they apply to the proposed new AI app the company is considering. What is the CEO/Board going to want to know? What is the benefit of this AI for the company? What are the downsides? The issues of concern? Explain the considerations and steps your company should cover in evaluating whether to implement the proposed new AI application for the future.

    (Utilize Week 6 Lesson & eReserve readings as part of your research for this section.)

    Recommendation for [Company Name]'s Implementing [Name of the AI Application]

    What is the recommendation: use the app or pass on it? Why? Also in this section, assuming the business decides to use the AI application, recommend and explain at least three (3) steps the company should employ in its implementation. (Refer to Week 6 Lesson and eReserve readings as part of your research.) These should be three (3) main general steps important to cover.

    Conclusion

    Wrapping up: Summarize the benefits and considerations of AI and the business using this AI application and recommendation.

    References

    This is a separate page listing the APA7 citations of your supporting research. All should be cited in text in the paper.

    You must use a minimum five (5) credible sources.

    *How Do I Know if a Source is Credible? [Purdue webpage] and How Can I Find Credible Sources? [article]

    All references listed on the References page must also appear as in-text citations in the paper, correctly supporting your narrative.

    Paper Structure:

    Prepare your paper in Word in APA 7th Ed. Style. See the APA Help module in Course Content.

    Write in third-person.

    NO abstract. NO table of contents.

    Length: 2,100–2,300 words (excluding Title Page and References Page).

    References — Minimum of five (5) credible References; all sources listed on the References page must be cited in-text, supporting your narrative.

    See help sources below and Grading Rubric for further guidance.

    TIP: Use the Grading Rubric/Exemplary standard as a checklist for proofing your final paper draft. For grammar and spelling, Turnitin provides feedback if you submit a draft in advance. Word also has a grammar/spelling/usage app you can run on your draft.

    Your paper will automatically go through Turnitin with your submission and is also subject to review for misuse of generative AI. Assignments are setup with unlimited submissions so you can check your work through Turnitin multiple times before the due date. Strive for a Turnitin score below 20%. Scores above 20% indicate there may be an issue your instructor is more likely to penalize.

    References

    Passalacqua, M., Pellerin, R., Magnani, F., Doyon-Poulin, P., Del-Aguila, L., Boasen, J., & Léger, P.-M. (2025). Human-centred AI in industry 5.0: a systematic review. International Journal of Production Research, 63(7), 2638–2669. https://doi-org.ezproxy1.apus.edu/10.1080/00207543.2024.2406021

    An-Chi, L., Wang, J., Zhan, Y., Chien-Jung, L., & Yang, L. (2021). Meta-Frontier Analysis of Disclosing Sustainable Development Information: Evidence from China’s AI Industry. Energies, 14(19), 6139. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14196139

    Taiwan telecommunication AI industry ESG disclosure. (2025). Scientific Reports (Nature Publisher Group), 15(1), 20043. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-04585-1

    **## week7600FINAL.docx**

    Week 7 Assignment: Final Project

    Signature Assignment: This assignment aligns with all course COs.

    Recommendation: Print complete Assignment to fully read and reference in preparing your paper! Paper outline is included.

    Prompt:

    Background

    For your final project, you are creating your own hypothetical scenario within the following parameters and applying the concepts covered this term.

    The INDUSTRY:

    First, select one of the following industries for this project and research the use of AI in this industry. (This has been covered in the Lessons also.)

    Agriculture

    Transportation

    Healthcare

    Finance

    Aerospace

    Education

    The COMPANY:

    Now, for this project,

    Create a hypothetical U.S. private for-profit civilian company of 200+ employees that is in business in the industry you have selected. The company is a C-corporation owned by multiple unrelated shareholders.

    Give your company a name.

    You might research current businesses in the industry for ideas, but the assignment is to create a hypothetical company.

    You are the VP of Innovation of this company.

    The AI:

    Next:

    Imagine a new AI application that might help productivity, ensure the business' continuity, streamline efficiency, and thus free up time in tasks that humans now perform in the company.

    This can be a potential AI app you completely dream up, or it can be a new one just being released on the market that you find in your research.

    Identify which of the six (6) AI subfields is the primary AI type (see Week 2 Lesson) of this new AI. There are potential new apps in a variety of areas to consider for any industry now or in the future. To help your ideas for creative research for this paper, you could look at—for example—AI assistance in such areas as AI-robotics, wearables, financial applications, cybersecurity, safety, product upgrades, customer support, medical diagnostics, supply chain, or transportation.

    **NOTE:

    You are looking at the company’s acquisition and use of a proposed new AI app that might support/enhance the company’s business in some way—NOT a new product for the company to develop, sell or manufacture. Here is an analogy: It's like acquiring a new broom to sweep the company's production floor, not a new broom to create, develop, market, and sell to customers for their floors. Your company is not creating or building the AI app. It is considering if it should acquire and use it in its business operations.

    The Assignment Task & Format Instructions and How to Organize Your Content :

    The following provides an outline for your paper’s content with explanatory notes about what you should cover for each section. Use the APA Sample Student Paper you have used in prior Assignments for a template of how to structure your paper.

    The Project:

    Having imagined and created the hypothetical company in the selected industry and a new AI application as directed above, here is the Project Assignment:

    You are the company's Vice President of Innovation.

    The CEO and Board have asked for your research and recommendation about the new AI app.

    Prepare an APA7 paper that covers the points outlined below for the hypothetical you have created.

    Write this paper in the third person—NOT using “I”, “we”, “us”, “you”, or “your”.

    Use the following outline for your content, which incorporates the Lesson material we have covered for the Course Objectives.

    **TIP: Embrace the hypothetical as if it were a real business and mentally immerse yourself as the VP advising the CEO and Board. Use the company name where appropriate. Use the AI app name where appropriate. In other words, make it real.

    **Paper Content Outline (Follow APA7 format as in prior Assignments):

    Suggested title: Executive Report on the [Company Name]’s Use of [Name of AI Application]

    Introduction

    In this section, you setting up your paper and introducing your topic. Describe the industry, the company, and the company’s particular business in the industry. Explain what the company does (examples: services, manufacturing, retail, etc.), which will in turn drive the type of AI application it would be using. Summarize how AI is transforming business and how a new AI app—named [app's name]—is being considered for the company. There are pros, cons, and other issues to consider in making the decision.

    How AI is Transforming Business

    In this section, summarize how AI has transformed business in general and how it is transforming, in particular, the company's industry that you selected for your topic. Briefly summarize how this transformation is affecting the company's need to advance.

    Proposed New AI Application

    In this section, explain the company’s interest in a new AI application named [app's name] and the potential benefit this AI might bring for the business. Describe the AI application of interest (as you have imagined it—as indicated in PROMPT/Background above).

    NOTE: This does not require a detailed technical description of the AI. What is the main AI subfield involved, and what will be the AI’s function for the company? For example: “[Name of the AI app] will use natural language processing to [description of app function]” OR “The company is considering a new AI wearable device called [name of the AI app] which machine learning [description of app function]." Then describe what it does. In these examples, it is not necessary to explain how NLP or ML itself works, only correctly align the subfield with the proposed AI app for the company. The function and benefit of the AI app for the company’s operations is the focus of your description. In short, what is the AI, and what does it do?

    Pros, Cons, and Benefits of AI

    In this section, first describe the general issues—pros and cons—of AI in business, including the benefits of AI. What are the benefits? What are the issues? Issues should include legal/ethical issues, change issues (e.g. work force disruption), concerns such as bias and corruption, and future implications. This provides a baseline for discussing the specific AI for your business.

    Evaluation of AI for a Business

    Summarize the pros, cons, and benefits for the (1) specific industry and company of your hypothetical, and (2) how they apply to the proposed new AI app the company is considering. What is the CEO/Board going to want to know? What is the benefit of this AI for the company? What are the downsides? The issues of concern? Explain the considerations and steps your company should cover in evaluating whether to implement the proposed new AI application for the future.

    (Utilize Week 6 Lesson & eReserve readings as part of your research for this section.)

    Recommendation for [Company Name]'s Implementing [Name of the AI Application]

    What is the recommendation: use the app or pass on it? Why? Also in this section, assuming the business decides to use the AI application, recommend and explain at least three (3) steps the company should employ in its implementation. (Refer to Week 6 Lesson and eReserve readings as part of your research.) These should be three (3) main general steps important to cover.

    Conclusion

    Wrapping up: Summarize the benefits and considerations of AI and the business using this AI application and recommendation.

    References

    This is a separate page listing the APA7 citations of your supporting research. All should be cited in text in the paper.

    You must use a minimum five (5) credible sources.

    *How Do I Know if a Source is Credible? [Purdue webpage] and How Can I Find Credible Sources? [article]

    All references listed on the References page must also appear as in-text citations in the paper, correctly supporting your narrative.

    Paper Structure:

    Prepare your paper in Word in APA 7th Ed. Style. See the APA Help module in Course Content.

    Write in third-person.

    NO abstract. NO table of contents.

    Length: 2,100–2,300 words (excluding Title Page and References Page).

    References — Minimum of five (5) credible References; all sources listed on the References page must be cited in-text, supporting your narrative.

    See help sources below and Grading Rubric for further guidance.

    TIP: Use the Grading Rubric/Exemplary standard as a checklist for proofing your final paper draft. For grammar and spelling, Turnitin provides feedback if you submit a draft in advance. Word also has a grammar/spelling/usage app you can run on your draft.

    Your paper will automatically go through Turnitin with your submission and is also subject to review for misuse of generative AI. Assignments are setup with unlimited submissions so you can check your work through Turnitin multiple times before the due date. Strive for a Turnitin score below 20%. Scores above 20% indicate there may be an issue your instructor is more likely to penalize.

    References

    Passalacqua, M., Pellerin, R., Magnani, F., Doyon-Poulin, P., Del-Aguila, L., Boasen, J., & Léger, P.-M. (2025). Human-centred AI in industry 5.0: a systematic review. International Journal of Production Research, 63(7), 2638–2669. https://doi-org.ezproxy1.apus.edu/10.1080/00207543.2024.2406021

    An-Chi, L., Wang, J., Zhan, Y., Chien-Jung, L., & Yang, L. (2021). Meta-Frontier Analysis of Disclosing Sustainable Development Information: Evidence from China’s AI Industry. Energies, 14(19), 6139. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14196139

    Taiwan telecommunication AI industry ESG disclosure. (2025). Scientific Reports (Nature Publisher Group), 15(1), 20043. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-04585-1

  • [Solved] Bmgt

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-management)

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-management)