Executive Solution Overview
**files (1)** – ## Module6.docx **## Module6.docx** **Module 6:** _Descriptive and Inferential Statistics: Identifying Them in Journals_ **Instructions** Distinguish between the organization of articles by evidence level and organization of articles by clinical question (Essay). Please utilize Figur…
Instant Solution Download
$6.99Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Need a Fresh Custom Paper?
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →Assignment Prompt & Instructions
**files (1)**
– ## Module6.docx
**## Module6.docx**
**Module 6:** _Descriptive and Inferential Statistics: Identifying Them in Journals_
**Instructions**
Distinguish between the organization of articles by evidence level and organization of articles by clinical question (Essay). Please utilize Figure 1 John Hopkins Evidence Based-Practice Model for Nursing and Health Care Professionals.
Once all the articles considered important to answer the clinical question have been gathered, the DNP should be able organize the articles by level of evidence and type of evidence.
1. What is the purpose of the article organization?
2. How do you compare the article organization by type of evidence vs the organization based on the type of clinical question?
3. What is the best way to organize the studies when the organization is based on the clinical question?
**Use an Essay Format**
· You must present your writing double-spaced, in a Times New Roman, Arial or Courier New font, with a font size of 12.
· Pay attention to grammar rules (spelling and syntax).
· Your work must be original and must not contain material copied from books or the internet.
· When citing the work of other authors, include citations and references using APA 7th style to respect their intellectual property and avoid plagiarism.
· Remember that your writing must have a header or a cover page that includes the name of the institution, the program, the course code, the title of the activity, your name and student number, and the assignment's due date.
Contribute a minimum of 5 pages. It should include at least 3 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.
Be sure to review the
[academic expectations](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/1876/pages/expectations-and-best-practices-for-assignments) for your submission.
**Submission Instructions:**
· Submit your assignment by 11:59 PM Eastern on the due date.
· Review the rubric to determine how your assignment will be graded.
· Your assignment will be run through Turnitin to check for plagiarism.
·
[File Upload](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/44875/assignments/877917)
·
[Studio](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/44875/assignments/877917)
·
[Google Drive](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/44875/assignments/877917)
·
[Office 365](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/44875/assignments/877917)
Top of Form
| | |
| — | — |
| Upload a file, or choose a file you've already uploaded. |
| Drag a file here, or<br>Choose a file to upload |
| | |
| |
| <="" div="" style="margin: 10px 0px;"><br>I agree to the tool's <br>[End-User License Agreement](https://agmu.turnitin.com/integrations/cpf/eula/agmu)<br>This assignment submission is my own, original work<br>* | |
| |
Bottom of Form
Rubric
**- Official Essay Rubric**
| | | |
| — | — | — |
| – Official Essay Rubric |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent<br>Mastery of the Information | **30 to >27.0 ptsExcellent** The essay content properly aligns with the information requested and reflects student exemplary mastery of the content by showing complete information, details, and examples.<br> <br>**27 to >24.0 ptsGood** The essay content aligns with the information requested and shows good mastery of the content. Provides sufficient information, however missed opportunities to demonstrate supporting details and/or examples.<br> <br>**24 to >21.0 ptsFair** The essay content aligns with the information requested and shows fair mastery of the content. Provides sufficient information, but lacks supporting details and/or examples.<br> <br>**21 to >18.0 ptsPoor** The essay content does not align with the information requested. Does not demonstrate mastery of the concepts.<br> <br>**18 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 30 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization<br>Structure of the Essay | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** The essay has a clear format, an introduction, a body with clear transitions between evidence and supporting arguments, and a conclusion. The information is presented in an orderly manner. All elements facilitate the flow of the information in the document.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** The essay has a clear format, an introduction, a body with evidence, supporting arguments, and a conclusion. All elements facilitate the flow of the information in the document, but the essay may miss transitions between sections or have other small organization issues.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** The essay structure is problematic, lacks logical flow, and has at least one of these issues: The essay does not have a clear introduction or conclusion, or the evidence and supporting arguments are not aligned with the requested requirements.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The essay does not appear to have any structure: no introduction, progression of thought, or defined conclusion.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking<br>Development of Ideas | **15 to >14.0 ptsExcellent** Details are considered, and a point of view, thesis statement, or main idea is clear. Next, the essay presents excellent evidence, arguments, and examples to support the point. Finally, the student draws meaningful and high-level insightful conclusions based on the information presented and explained.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsGood (12 -11 pts)** Details are considered, and a point of view, thesis statement, or main idea is clear. Next, the essay presents sufficient evidence, arguments, or examples to support the point. Finally, it draws appropriate conclusions based on the information presented and explained.<br> <br>**12 to >11.0 ptsFair** Details are considered, and a point of view, thesis statement, or main idea is identified. Next, the essay presents some evidence, arguments, or examples, but some are not relevant to support the point. Student draws fair conclusions, but not all are based on or supported by the presented information.<br> <br>**11 to >9.0 ptsPoor** Details are not considered, and a point of view, thesis statement, or main idea is exceptionally vague. The provided evidence, arguments, or examples are disconnected or not relevant. Additionally, the essay lacks a conclusion or repeats previous statements made.<br> <br>**9 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 15 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInformation Literacy<br>Quality of Resources | **15 to >14.0 ptsExcellent** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, up to date (depending on what is acceptable in the field), from credible and trusted sources, and the number of sources meets the requested amount.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsGood** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 1 source is not a credible and trusted source; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount.<br> <br>**12 to >11.0 ptsFair** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 2 or more sources are not credible and trusted sources; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount.<br> <br>**11 to >9.0 ptsPoor** The following criteria would apply, supporting information is not pertinent to the topic, none of the sources are from credible or trusted sources, or the number of sources requested was not met.<br> <br>**9 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** Resources did not reflect the requested outcomes, were off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 15 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting<br>Mechanics and Grammar | **10 to >9.0 ptsExcellent** Excellence in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure.<br> <br>**9 to >8.0 ptsGood** Minimal (1 – 3) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**8 to >7.0 ptsFair** Multiple (4 -7) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**7 to >5.0 ptsPoor** Severe (8 – 10) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**5 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** Unacceptable (11 or more) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormatting and APA Guidelines | **10 to >9.0 ptsExcellent** The essay reflects excellent execution and incorporation of APA guidelines. Correct formatting, setup, title page, perfect in-text citations, and reference formatting.<br> <br>**9 to >8.0 ptsGood** The essay offers correct formatting on the setup, and title page, with minimal formatting or punctuation errors within the in-text citations or references.<br> <br>**8 to >6.0 ptsFair** The essay offers correct formatting, setup, and title page but has significant errors within in-text citations and references.<br> <br>**6 to >5.0 ptsPoor** The essay offers severe incorrect APA formatting, setup or missing title page, and/or problematic in-text citations and references.<br> <br>**5 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** APA style not used and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 10 pts |
Total Points: 100
**## Module6.docx**
**Module 6:** _Descriptive and Inferential Statistics: Identifying Them in Journals_
**Instructions**
Distinguish between the organization of articles by evidence level and organization of articles by clinical question (Essay). Please utilize Figure 1 John Hopkins Evidence Based-Practice Model for Nursing and Health Care Professionals.
Once all the articles considered important to answer the clinical question have been gathered, the DNP should be able organize the articles by level of evidence and type of evidence.
1. What is the purpose of the article organization?
2. How do you compare the article organization by type of evidence vs the organization based on the type of clinical question?
3. What is the best way to organize the studies when the organization is based on the clinical question?
**Use an Essay Format**
· You must present your writing double-spaced, in a Times New Roman, Arial or Courier New font, with a font size of 12.
· Pay attention to grammar rules (spelling and syntax).
· Your work must be original and must not contain material copied from books or the internet.
· When citing the work of other authors, include citations and references using APA 7th style to respect their intellectual property and avoid plagiarism.
· Remember that your writing must have a header or a cover page that includes the name of the institution, the program, the course code, the title of the activity, your name and student number, and the assignment's due date.
Contribute a minimum of 5 pages. It should include at least 3 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.
Be sure to review the
[academic expectations](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/1876/pages/expectations-and-best-practices-for-assignments) for your submission.
**Submission Instructions:**
· Submit your assignment by 11:59 PM Eastern on the due date.
· Review the rubric to determine how your assignment will be graded.
· Your assignment will be run through Turnitin to check for plagiarism.
·
[File Upload](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/44875/assignments/877917)
·
[Studio](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/44875/assignments/877917)
·
[Google Drive](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/44875/assignments/877917)
·
[Office 365](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/44875/assignments/877917)
Top of Form
| | |
| — | — |
| Upload a file, or choose a file you've already uploaded. |
| Drag a file here, or<br>Choose a file to upload |
| | |
| |
| <="" div="" style="margin: 10px 0px;"><br>I agree to the tool's <br>[End-User License Agreement](https://agmu.turnitin.com/integrations/cpf/eula/agmu)<br>This assignment submission is my own, original work<br>* | |
| |
Bottom of Form
Rubric
**- Official Essay Rubric**
| | | |
| — | — | — |
| – Official Essay Rubric |
| **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent<br>Mastery of the Information | **30 to >27.0 ptsExcellent** The essay content properly aligns with the information requested and reflects student exemplary mastery of the content by showing complete information, details, and examples.<br> <br>**27 to >24.0 ptsGood** The essay content aligns with the information requested and shows good mastery of the content. Provides sufficient information, however missed opportunities to demonstrate supporting details and/or examples.<br> <br>**24 to >21.0 ptsFair** The essay content aligns with the information requested and shows fair mastery of the content. Provides sufficient information, but lacks supporting details and/or examples.<br> <br>**21 to >18.0 ptsPoor** The essay content does not align with the information requested. Does not demonstrate mastery of the concepts.<br> <br>**18 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 30 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization<br>Structure of the Essay | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** The essay has a clear format, an introduction, a body with clear transitions between evidence and supporting arguments, and a conclusion. The information is presented in an orderly manner. All elements facilitate the flow of the information in the document.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** The essay has a clear format, an introduction, a body with evidence, supporting arguments, and a conclusion. All elements facilitate the flow of the information in the document, but the essay may miss transitions between sections or have other small organization issues.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** The essay structure is problematic, lacks logical flow, and has at least one of these issues: The essay does not have a clear introduction or conclusion, or the evidence and supporting arguments are not aligned with the requested requirements.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The essay does not appear to have any structure: no introduction, progression of thought, or defined conclusion.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking<br>Development of Ideas | **15 to >14.0 ptsExcellent** Details are considered, and a point of view, thesis statement, or main idea is clear. Next, the essay presents excellent evidence, arguments, and examples to support the point. Finally, the student draws meaningful and high-level insightful conclusions based on the information presented and explained.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsGood (12 -11 pts)** Details are considered, and a point of view, thesis statement, or main idea is clear. Next, the essay presents sufficient evidence, arguments, or examples to support the point. Finally, it draws appropriate conclusions based on the information presented and explained.<br> <br>**12 to >11.0 ptsFair** Details are considered, and a point of view, thesis statement, or main idea is identified. Next, the essay presents some evidence, arguments, or examples, but some are not relevant to support the point. Student draws fair conclusions, but not all are based on or supported by the presented information.<br> <br>**11 to >9.0 ptsPoor** Details are not considered, and a point of view, thesis statement, or main idea is exceptionally vague. The provided evidence, arguments, or examples are disconnected or not relevant. Additionally, the essay lacks a conclusion or repeats previous statements made.<br> <br>**9 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 15 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInformation Literacy<br>Quality of Resources | **15 to >14.0 ptsExcellent** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, up to date (depending on what is acceptable in the field), from credible and trusted sources, and the number of sources meets the requested amount.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsGood** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 1 source is not a credible and trusted source; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount.<br> <br>**12 to >11.0 ptsFair** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 2 or more sources are not credible and trusted sources; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount.<br> <br>**11 to >9.0 ptsPoor** The following criteria would apply, supporting information is not pertinent to the topic, none of the sources are from credible or trusted sources, or the number of sources requested was not met.<br> <br>**9 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** Resources did not reflect the requested outcomes, were off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 15 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting<br>Mechanics and Grammar | **10 to >9.0 ptsExcellent** Excellence in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure.<br> <br>**9 to >8.0 ptsGood** Minimal (1 – 3) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**8 to >7.0 ptsFair** Multiple (4 -7) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**7 to >5.0 ptsPoor** Severe (8 – 10) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**5 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** Unacceptable (11 or more) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormatting and APA Guidelines | **10 to >9.0 ptsExcellent** The essay reflects excellent execution and incorporation of APA guidelines. Correct formatting, setup, title page, perfect in-text citations, and reference formatting.<br> <br>**9 to >8.0 ptsGood** The essay offers correct formatting on the setup, and title page, with minimal formatting or punctuation errors within the in-text citations or references.<br> <br>**8 to >6.0 ptsFair** The essay offers correct formatting, setup, and title page but has significant errors within in-text citations and references.<br> <br>**6 to >5.0 ptsPoor** The essay offers severe incorrect APA formatting, setup or missing title page, and/or problematic in-text citations and references.<br> <br>**5 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** APA style not used and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 10 pts |
Total Points: 100