Tag: Model Answer

  • [Solved] Community Health

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Please see attached. **files (1)** – ## Assessment2Instruction.docx **## Assessment2Instruction.docx** Research a selected local, national, or global nonprofit organization or government agency from the document provided. Determine how the organization or agency contributes to public health and safe…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Please see attached.

    **files (1)**

    – ## Assessment2Instruction.docx

    **## Assessment2Instruction.docx**

    Research a selected local, national, or global nonprofit organization or government agency from the document provided. Determine how the organization or agency contributes to public health and safety improvements, promotes equal opportunity, and improves the quality of life within the community.

    Selected organization
    **: National Alliance on Mental Health (NAMI): NAMI provides advocacy, education, support, and public awareness to improve the lives of individuals and families affected by mental illness**.

    Submit your findings in a 3–5 page report.

    The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide, so be sure to address each point. Read the performance-level descriptions in the scoring guide for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.

    · Explain how an organization’s mission and vision enable it to contribute to public health and safety improvements.

    · Provide examples of ways a local and/or global initiative supports the mission and vision and promotes public health and safety.

    · Evaluate an organization’s ability to promote equal opportunity and improve the quality of life in a community.

    · Consider the effects of social, cultural, economic, and physical barriers.

    · Be sure to go beyond simply describing what the organization does in these areas but evaluating the impact.

    · Assess the impact of funding sources, policy, and legislation on an organization's service delivery.

    · Consider the potential implications of funding decisions, policy, and legislation for individuals, families, and aggregates within the community.

    · Remember to actually include the policies, legislation, and funding avenues for your chosen organization.

    · Explain how an organization’s work impacts the health and/or safety needs of a local community.

    · Consider how nurses might become involved with the organization.

    · How are nurses involved within this organization?

    · Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

    · Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.

    · Write with a specific purpose and audience in mind.

    · Adhere to scholarly and disciplinary writing standards and APA formatting requirements.

    **Scoring Requirements**

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    ·
    **Competency 1**: Analyze health risks and healthcare needs among distinct populations.

    · Explain how an organization’s work impacts the health and/or safety needs of a local community.

    ·
    **Competency 2:** Propose health promotion strategies to improve the health of populations.

    · Explain how an organization’s mission and vision enable it to contribute to public health and safety improvements.

    ·
    **Competency 3:** Evaluate health policies based on their ability to achieve desired outcomes.

    · Assess the impact of funding sources, policy, and legislation on an organization's service delivery.

    ·
    **Competency 4:** Integrate principles of social justice in community health interventions.

    · Evaluate an organization’s ability to promote equal opportunity and improve the quality of life in a community.

    ·
    **Competency 5:** Apply professional, scholarly communication strategies to lead health promotion and improve population health.

    · Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

    · Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.

    **## Assessment2Instruction.docx**

    Research a selected local, national, or global nonprofit organization or government agency from the document provided. Determine how the organization or agency contributes to public health and safety improvements, promotes equal opportunity, and improves the quality of life within the community.

    Selected organization
    **: National Alliance on Mental Health (NAMI): NAMI provides advocacy, education, support, and public awareness to improve the lives of individuals and families affected by mental illness**.

    Submit your findings in a 3–5 page report.

    The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide, so be sure to address each point. Read the performance-level descriptions in the scoring guide for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.

    · Explain how an organization’s mission and vision enable it to contribute to public health and safety improvements.

    · Provide examples of ways a local and/or global initiative supports the mission and vision and promotes public health and safety.

    · Evaluate an organization’s ability to promote equal opportunity and improve the quality of life in a community.

    · Consider the effects of social, cultural, economic, and physical barriers.

    · Be sure to go beyond simply describing what the organization does in these areas but evaluating the impact.

    · Assess the impact of funding sources, policy, and legislation on an organization's service delivery.

    · Consider the potential implications of funding decisions, policy, and legislation for individuals, families, and aggregates within the community.

    · Remember to actually include the policies, legislation, and funding avenues for your chosen organization.

    · Explain how an organization’s work impacts the health and/or safety needs of a local community.

    · Consider how nurses might become involved with the organization.

    · How are nurses involved within this organization?

    · Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

    · Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.

    · Write with a specific purpose and audience in mind.

    · Adhere to scholarly and disciplinary writing standards and APA formatting requirements.

    **Scoring Requirements**

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    ·
    **Competency 1**: Analyze health risks and healthcare needs among distinct populations.

    · Explain how an organization’s work impacts the health and/or safety needs of a local community.

    ·
    **Competency 2:** Propose health promotion strategies to improve the health of populations.

    · Explain how an organization’s mission and vision enable it to contribute to public health and safety improvements.

    ·
    **Competency 3:** Evaluate health policies based on their ability to achieve desired outcomes.

    · Assess the impact of funding sources, policy, and legislation on an organization's service delivery.

    ·
    **Competency 4:** Integrate principles of social justice in community health interventions.

    · Evaluate an organization’s ability to promote equal opportunity and improve the quality of life in a community.

    ·
    **Competency 5:** Apply professional, scholarly communication strategies to lead health promotion and improve population health.

    · Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

    · Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.

  • [Solved] Teacher ToolKit

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Becoming a multicultural educator signifies embarking on a journey to connect disparate cultural worlds, symbolized by the essential act of building bridges. This journey is deeply embedded in ethics, urging educators and students to advocate for inclusivity and equality while embracing virtues such…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Becoming a multicultural educator signifies embarking on a journey to connect disparate cultural worlds, symbolized by the essential act of building bridges. This journey is deeply embedded in ethics, urging educators and students to advocate for inclusivity and equality while embracing virtues such as empathy, respect, and understanding. Central to this effort is the principle of _imago Dei_—the conviction that every person is made in God's image, underscoring each individual's inherent worth and dignity beyond the bounds of cultural, racial, and ethnic distinctions. Respectful communication is crucial on this path, allowing for recognizing and celebrating cultural identities, thereby creating an environment where every voice is heard and valued. By integrating these principles, we acknowledge the wealth of diverse backgrounds and lay the groundwork for a more cohesive and inclusive community. Thus, multicultural education transcends mere academic learning, evolving into a transformative force that equips individuals to navigate and contribute to an increasingly interconnected world, guided by the profound understanding that we are all reflections of the divine.

    **Part 1: Toolkit**

    Using a free online tool such as Trello or Padlet, create a comprehensive digital toolkit designed to support and enhance multicultural education in the classroom. Divide your toolkit into the four key categories below, each focusing on a different aspect of multicultural education. For each category, identify and elaborate on four strategies, providing a total of 16 strategies to promote a culturally responsive and inclusive learning environment. This assignment encourages you to think critically about how to effectively integrate multicultural principles into educational settings.

    **Categories and Strategy Guidelines:**

    Your digital toolkit must include the following categories. For each category, add four strategies, detailing how they can be applied in an educational setting.

    **Category 1: Curriculum Integration**

    – Explore ways to incorporate multicultural perspectives and content across different subjects or within the content area you teach.
    – Include examples of multicultural literature, case studies, and historical events.

    **Category 2: Culturally Responsive Teaching Methods**

    – Detail methods that acknowledge and utilize students' cultural backgrounds in teaching and learning processes.
    – Provide strategies for adapting teaching styles to meet the diverse needs of learners.

    **Category 3: Fostering a Multicultural Classroom Environment**

    – Suggest ideas for creating an inclusive classroom that respects and celebrates cultural differences.
    – Include ideas for physical classroom setup, inclusive language practices, and the establishment of community norms.

    **Category 4: Engagement with Families and Community**

    – Propose ways to involve families and community members in the educational process, enhancing cultural exchange and understanding.
    – Include ideas for community-based learning projects, cultural events, and parent workshops.

    Please make sure you include my name in the teacher toolkit

    Also,the link to the teacher toolkit as well

  • [Solved] Nursing

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Nursing.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Week6Dis

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Week6Dis.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Research Paper

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Operations Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-operations-management) Please see attached instruction and grading rubric for this paper. **files (2)** – ## ResearchPaperAssignmentInstructions.docx – ## ResearchPaperGradingRubric.pdf **## ResearchPaperAssign…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Operations Management homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-operations-management)

    Please see attached instruction and grading rubric for this paper.

    **files (2)**

    – ## ResearchPaperAssignmentInstructions.docx

    – ## ResearchPaperGradingRubric.pdf

    **## ResearchPaperAssignmentInstructions.docx**

    BMAL 710

    **Research Paper Assignment Instructions**

    **Overview**

    Select an organization of your choice that, you believe, is facing organizational issues. Make sure to select an organization that has publicly available information to substantiate your claims, and it cannot be an organization where you worked or are currently working. In 1-2 pages, provide a description of two to three problems identified. Your description need not be elaborate but should provide enough information to enable someone unfamiliar with the organizational issues to understand the focus of your study. This portion should be just the facts, a description, not an analysis of the key events. Make sure to support your assertions and information regarding existence of organizationl issues you are describing with supporting citations.

    After you have set the foundation, apply theories, concepts, and principles learned from the course to analyze your chosen organization and its identified problems. Make sure to support your analysis with supporting scholarly sources.

    Lastly, provide a personal and biblical perspectives that discuss what you would implement to address the problems to move the organization forward as part of the evolving changes for organizations today. Provide application of theories to your perspectives.

    **Instructions**

    Your paper must include:

    · Minimum 3000 words – body of the paper (not including the title page, abstract, and references)

    · Support from the Bible

    · Support from 10 scholarly, peer-reviewed sources

    · Support from the course textbook (Daft)

    · Support from Merida text

    · Title page

    · Abstract

    · Reference list

    · Adherence to the APA-7 Professional version format including but not limited to title page, headings, margins, page numbers, citations, references, font, line spacing, etc.

    When you reference the Bible for biblical integration, it is the holy Word of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ and it is not considered an academic, peer-reviewed source.

    Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

    **## ResearchPaperGradingRubric.pdf**

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Identification of
    Issues

    40 to >35 pts

    Advanced

    Presents articulate and
    detailed descriptions of
    the problems and
    issues central to the
    organization. Provides a
    well-focused diagnosis
    of strategic issues and
    key problems that
    demonstrate an
    excellent grasp of the
    situation and
    challenges; descriptions
    are compelling and
    insightful; provides a
    thorough and effective
    summary.

    35 to >27 pts

    Proficient

    With a few exceptions,
    identifies and outlines
    the principal problems
    and issues in the
    organization;
    demonstrates an
    acceptable
    understanding of the
    issues, situation, and
    challenges; summary
    provides an adequate
    overview of the case
    issues and problems.
    Summary is missing a
    few minor points but
    meets expectations.

    27 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Does not fully
    recognize the
    problems or identifies
    problems and issues
    that are not relevant;
    displays little
    understanding of the
    issues, key problems,
    the situation, and
    challenges. Summary
    does not present a
    clear overview of the
    case issues; the main
    points are not outlined
    or cannot be
    understood.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    40 pts

    Analysis and
    Evaluation

    50 to >44 pts

    Advanced

    Presents a balanced,
    in-depth, and critical
    assessment of the facts
    considering relevant
    empirical and
    theoretical research;
    develops insightful and
    well-supported
    conclusions using
    reasoned, sound, and
    informed judgments.
    Application to theories
    and organizational
    analysis of issues from
    the course concepts is
    well evidenced.

    44 to >34 pts

    Proficient

    Provides an acceptable
    analysis of most of the
    issues and problems; in
    most instances,
    analysis is adequately
    supported by theory
    and empirical data;
    appropriate conclusions
    are outlined and
    summarized.
    Application to theories
    and organizational
    analysis from the
    course concepts is
    somewhat evidenced.

    34 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Does not fully discuss
    the relevance of the
    facts; fails to draw
    conclusions, or
    conclusions are not
    justified or supported;
    does not fully present
    relevant research or
    data; shows no critical
    examination of issues.
    Application to theories
    and organizational
    analysis from the
    course concepts is not
    thoroughly applied.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    50 pts

    Research Paper Grading Rubric | BMAL710_B08_202620

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Personal/Biblical
    Perspective/Solutions

    50 to >44 pts

    Advanced

    Effectively weighs and
    assesses a variety of
    alternative actions that
    address the multiple
    issues central to the
    organization; proposes
    detailed plans of action;
    action plans are realistic
    and contain thorough
    and well-reasoned
    justifications. Various
    theories and biblical
    principles are well
    applied.

    44 to >34 pts

    Proficient

    Outlines and
    summarizes some
    alternative courses of
    action to deal with most
    of the issues and
    problems in the
    organization; in most
    instances, proposed
    action plans are
    outlined, are feasible,
    and based on relatively
    sound theory and
    evidence. Various
    theories and biblical
    principles are
    somewhat applied.

    34 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Has difficulty
    identifying alternatives
    and appropriate
    courses of action; few,
    if any, alternatives are
    presented, infeasible
    actions are proposed,
    action plans are not
    supported, or actions
    do not address the key
    issues and problems in
    the organization.
    Various theories and
    biblical principles are
    not thoroughly applied.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    50 pts

    Organization 10 to >8 pts

    Advanced

    Very well organized.
    The narrative has clarity
    and includes strong,
    clear and varied
    transitions linking
    sub-topics and main
    topic. The narrative
    flows well throughout.

    8 to >6 pts

    Proficient

    Well organized. The
    narrative has clarity
    and flows logically, and
    includes transitions
    linking subtopics and
    the topic. The narrative
    may not always flow
    well at some points.

    6 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Somewhat well
    organized, flows
    logically, and includes
    some attempts to
    provide a variety of
    transitions. The
    narrative may not flow
    well.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    10 pts

    APA Format (Cover
    page, references,
    margins, citations,
    pagination, headings,
    headers, abstract,
    etc.) Grammar and
    Spelling

    20 to >17 pts

    Advanced

    Proper, current APA
    format is used.
    Proper spelling and
    grammar are used.

    17 to >13 pts

    Proficient

    There are 1–2 current
    APA formatting errors
    present.
    There are 1–2 spelling
    and/or grammar errors
    present.

    13 to >0 pts

    Developing

    There are 3–4 current
    APA formatting errors
    present.
    There are 3–4 spelling
    and/or grammar errors
    present.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    20 pts

    Length 10 to >8 pts

    Advanced

    The submission is at
    least 3000 words.

    8 to >6 pts

    Proficient

    The submission is
    2500-2999 words.

    6 to >0 pts

    Developing

    The submission is less
    than 2500 words.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    10 pts

    Research Paper Grading Rubric | BMAL710_B08_202620

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Sources 20 to >17 pts

    Advanced

    The paper met or
    exceeded the required
    minimum number of
    sources (the Bible, the
    course textbook, the
    Merida textbook, and 10
    or more peer-reviewed
    scholarly sources).

    17 to >13 pts

    Proficient

    The paper includes
    some of the required
    sources (the Bible, the
    course textbook, the
    Merida textbook, and
    7 to 9 peer-reviewed
    scholarly sources)
    and/or sources are not
    well integrated within
    the paper.

    13 to >0 pts

    Developing

    The paper is missing
    most of the required
    sources (the Bible, the
    course textbook, the
    Merida textbook, and
    fewer than 7
    peer-reviewed
    scholarly sources)
    and/or sources are not
    integrated within the
    paper.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    20 pts

    Total Points: 200

    Research Paper Grading Rubric | BMAL710_B08_202620

    **## ResearchPaperGradingRubric.pdf**

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Identification of
    Issues

    40 to >35 pts

    Advanced

    Presents articulate and
    detailed descriptions of
    the problems and
    issues central to the
    organization. Provides a
    well-focused diagnosis
    of strategic issues and
    key problems that
    demonstrate an
    excellent grasp of the
    situation and
    challenges; descriptions
    are compelling and
    insightful; provides a
    thorough and effective
    summary.

    35 to >27 pts

    Proficient

    With a few exceptions,
    identifies and outlines
    the principal problems
    and issues in the
    organization;
    demonstrates an
    acceptable
    understanding of the
    issues, situation, and
    challenges; summary
    provides an adequate
    overview of the case
    issues and problems.
    Summary is missing a
    few minor points but
    meets expectations.

    27 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Does not fully
    recognize the
    problems or identifies
    problems and issues
    that are not relevant;
    displays little
    understanding of the
    issues, key problems,
    the situation, and
    challenges. Summary
    does not present a
    clear overview of the
    case issues; the main
    points are not outlined
    or cannot be
    understood.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    40 pts

    Analysis and
    Evaluation

    50 to >44 pts

    Advanced

    Presents a balanced,
    in-depth, and critical
    assessment of the facts
    considering relevant
    empirical and
    theoretical research;
    develops insightful and
    well-supported
    conclusions using
    reasoned, sound, and
    informed judgments.
    Application to theories
    and organizational
    analysis of issues from
    the course concepts is
    well evidenced.

    44 to >34 pts

    Proficient

    Provides an acceptable
    analysis of most of the
    issues and problems; in
    most instances,
    analysis is adequately
    supported by theory
    and empirical data;
    appropriate conclusions
    are outlined and
    summarized.
    Application to theories
    and organizational
    analysis from the
    course concepts is
    somewhat evidenced.

    34 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Does not fully discuss
    the relevance of the
    facts; fails to draw
    conclusions, or
    conclusions are not
    justified or supported;
    does not fully present
    relevant research or
    data; shows no critical
    examination of issues.
    Application to theories
    and organizational
    analysis from the
    course concepts is not
    thoroughly applied.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    50 pts

    Research Paper Grading Rubric | BMAL710_B08_202620

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Personal/Biblical
    Perspective/Solutions

    50 to >44 pts

    Advanced

    Effectively weighs and
    assesses a variety of
    alternative actions that
    address the multiple
    issues central to the
    organization; proposes
    detailed plans of action;
    action plans are realistic
    and contain thorough
    and well-reasoned
    justifications. Various
    theories and biblical
    principles are well
    applied.

    44 to >34 pts

    Proficient

    Outlines and
    summarizes some
    alternative courses of
    action to deal with most
    of the issues and
    problems in the
    organization; in most
    instances, proposed
    action plans are
    outlined, are feasible,
    and based on relatively
    sound theory and
    evidence. Various
    theories and biblical
    principles are
    somewhat applied.

    34 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Has difficulty
    identifying alternatives
    and appropriate
    courses of action; few,
    if any, alternatives are
    presented, infeasible
    actions are proposed,
    action plans are not
    supported, or actions
    do not address the key
    issues and problems in
    the organization.
    Various theories and
    biblical principles are
    not thoroughly applied.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    50 pts

    Organization 10 to >8 pts

    Advanced

    Very well organized.
    The narrative has clarity
    and includes strong,
    clear and varied
    transitions linking
    sub-topics and main
    topic. The narrative
    flows well throughout.

    8 to >6 pts

    Proficient

    Well organized. The
    narrative has clarity
    and flows logically, and
    includes transitions
    linking subtopics and
    the topic. The narrative
    may not always flow
    well at some points.

    6 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Somewhat well
    organized, flows
    logically, and includes
    some attempts to
    provide a variety of
    transitions. The
    narrative may not flow
    well.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    10 pts

    APA Format (Cover
    page, references,
    margins, citations,
    pagination, headings,
    headers, abstract,
    etc.) Grammar and
    Spelling

    20 to >17 pts

    Advanced

    Proper, current APA
    format is used.
    Proper spelling and
    grammar are used.

    17 to >13 pts

    Proficient

    There are 1–2 current
    APA formatting errors
    present.
    There are 1–2 spelling
    and/or grammar errors
    present.

    13 to >0 pts

    Developing

    There are 3–4 current
    APA formatting errors
    present.
    There are 3–4 spelling
    and/or grammar errors
    present.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    20 pts

    Length 10 to >8 pts

    Advanced

    The submission is at
    least 3000 words.

    8 to >6 pts

    Proficient

    The submission is
    2500-2999 words.

    6 to >0 pts

    Developing

    The submission is less
    than 2500 words.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    10 pts

    Research Paper Grading Rubric | BMAL710_B08_202620

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Sources 20 to >17 pts

    Advanced

    The paper met or
    exceeded the required
    minimum number of
    sources (the Bible, the
    course textbook, the
    Merida textbook, and 10
    or more peer-reviewed
    scholarly sources).

    17 to >13 pts

    Proficient

    The paper includes
    some of the required
    sources (the Bible, the
    course textbook, the
    Merida textbook, and
    7 to 9 peer-reviewed
    scholarly sources)
    and/or sources are not
    well integrated within
    the paper.

    13 to >0 pts

    Developing

    The paper is missing
    most of the required
    sources (the Bible, the
    course textbook, the
    Merida textbook, and
    fewer than 7
    peer-reviewed
    scholarly sources)
    and/or sources are not
    integrated within the
    paper.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    20 pts

    Total Points: 200

    Research Paper Grading Rubric | BMAL710_B08_202620

    **## ResearchPaperAssignmentInstructions.docx**

    BMAL 710

    **Research Paper Assignment Instructions**

    **Overview**

    Select an organization of your choice that, you believe, is facing organizational issues. Make sure to select an organization that has publicly available information to substantiate your claims, and it cannot be an organization where you worked or are currently working. In 1-2 pages, provide a description of two to three problems identified. Your description need not be elaborate but should provide enough information to enable someone unfamiliar with the organizational issues to understand the focus of your study. This portion should be just the facts, a description, not an analysis of the key events. Make sure to support your assertions and information regarding existence of organizationl issues you are describing with supporting citations.

    After you have set the foundation, apply theories, concepts, and principles learned from the course to analyze your chosen organization and its identified problems. Make sure to support your analysis with supporting scholarly sources.

    Lastly, provide a personal and biblical perspectives that discuss what you would implement to address the problems to move the organization forward as part of the evolving changes for organizations today. Provide application of theories to your perspectives.

    **Instructions**

    Your paper must include:

    · Minimum 3000 words – body of the paper (not including the title page, abstract, and references)

    · Support from the Bible

    · Support from 10 scholarly, peer-reviewed sources

    · Support from the course textbook (Daft)

    · Support from Merida text

    · Title page

    · Abstract

    · Reference list

    · Adherence to the APA-7 Professional version format including but not limited to title page, headings, margins, page numbers, citations, references, font, line spacing, etc.

    When you reference the Bible for biblical integration, it is the holy Word of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ and it is not considered an academic, peer-reviewed source.

    Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

    **## ResearchPaperGradingRubric.pdf**

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Identification of
    Issues

    40 to >35 pts

    Advanced

    Presents articulate and
    detailed descriptions of
    the problems and
    issues central to the
    organization. Provides a
    well-focused diagnosis
    of strategic issues and
    key problems that
    demonstrate an
    excellent grasp of the
    situation and
    challenges; descriptions
    are compelling and
    insightful; provides a
    thorough and effective
    summary.

    35 to >27 pts

    Proficient

    With a few exceptions,
    identifies and outlines
    the principal problems
    and issues in the
    organization;
    demonstrates an
    acceptable
    understanding of the
    issues, situation, and
    challenges; summary
    provides an adequate
    overview of the case
    issues and problems.
    Summary is missing a
    few minor points but
    meets expectations.

    27 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Does not fully
    recognize the
    problems or identifies
    problems and issues
    that are not relevant;
    displays little
    understanding of the
    issues, key problems,
    the situation, and
    challenges. Summary
    does not present a
    clear overview of the
    case issues; the main
    points are not outlined
    or cannot be
    understood.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    40 pts

    Analysis and
    Evaluation

    50 to >44 pts

    Advanced

    Presents a balanced,
    in-depth, and critical
    assessment of the facts
    considering relevant
    empirical and
    theoretical research;
    develops insightful and
    well-supported
    conclusions using
    reasoned, sound, and
    informed judgments.
    Application to theories
    and organizational
    analysis of issues from
    the course concepts is
    well evidenced.

    44 to >34 pts

    Proficient

    Provides an acceptable
    analysis of most of the
    issues and problems; in
    most instances,
    analysis is adequately
    supported by theory
    and empirical data;
    appropriate conclusions
    are outlined and
    summarized.
    Application to theories
    and organizational
    analysis from the
    course concepts is
    somewhat evidenced.

    34 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Does not fully discuss
    the relevance of the
    facts; fails to draw
    conclusions, or
    conclusions are not
    justified or supported;
    does not fully present
    relevant research or
    data; shows no critical
    examination of issues.
    Application to theories
    and organizational
    analysis from the
    course concepts is not
    thoroughly applied.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    50 pts

    Research Paper Grading Rubric | BMAL710_B08_202620

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Personal/Biblical
    Perspective/Solutions

    50 to >44 pts

    Advanced

    Effectively weighs and
    assesses a variety of
    alternative actions that
    address the multiple
    issues central to the
    organization; proposes
    detailed plans of action;
    action plans are realistic
    and contain thorough
    and well-reasoned
    justifications. Various
    theories and biblical
    principles are well
    applied.

    44 to >34 pts

    Proficient

    Outlines and
    summarizes some
    alternative courses of
    action to deal with most
    of the issues and
    problems in the
    organization; in most
    instances, proposed
    action plans are
    outlined, are feasible,
    and based on relatively
    sound theory and
    evidence. Various
    theories and biblical
    principles are
    somewhat applied.

    34 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Has difficulty
    identifying alternatives
    and appropriate
    courses of action; few,
    if any, alternatives are
    presented, infeasible
    actions are proposed,
    action plans are not
    supported, or actions
    do not address the key
    issues and problems in
    the organization.
    Various theories and
    biblical principles are
    not thoroughly applied.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    50 pts

    Organization 10 to >8 pts

    Advanced

    Very well organized.
    The narrative has clarity
    and includes strong,
    clear and varied
    transitions linking
    sub-topics and main
    topic. The narrative
    flows well throughout.

    8 to >6 pts

    Proficient

    Well organized. The
    narrative has clarity
    and flows logically, and
    includes transitions
    linking subtopics and
    the topic. The narrative
    may not always flow
    well at some points.

    6 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Somewhat well
    organized, flows
    logically, and includes
    some attempts to
    provide a variety of
    transitions. The
    narrative may not flow
    well.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    10 pts

    APA Format (Cover
    page, references,
    margins, citations,
    pagination, headings,
    headers, abstract,
    etc.) Grammar and
    Spelling

    20 to >17 pts

    Advanced

    Proper, current APA
    format is used.
    Proper spelling and
    grammar are used.

    17 to >13 pts

    Proficient

    There are 1–2 current
    APA formatting errors
    present.
    There are 1–2 spelling
    and/or grammar errors
    present.

    13 to >0 pts

    Developing

    There are 3–4 current
    APA formatting errors
    present.
    There are 3–4 spelling
    and/or grammar errors
    present.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    20 pts

    Length 10 to >8 pts

    Advanced

    The submission is at
    least 3000 words.

    8 to >6 pts

    Proficient

    The submission is
    2500-2999 words.

    6 to >0 pts

    Developing

    The submission is less
    than 2500 words.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    10 pts

    Research Paper Grading Rubric | BMAL710_B08_202620

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Sources 20 to >17 pts

    Advanced

    The paper met or
    exceeded the required
    minimum number of
    sources (the Bible, the
    course textbook, the
    Merida textbook, and 10
    or more peer-reviewed
    scholarly sources).

    17 to >13 pts

    Proficient

    The paper includes
    some of the required
    sources (the Bible, the
    course textbook, the
    Merida textbook, and
    7 to 9 peer-reviewed
    scholarly sources)
    and/or sources are not
    well integrated within
    the paper.

    13 to >0 pts

    Developing

    The paper is missing
    most of the required
    sources (the Bible, the
    course textbook, the
    Merida textbook, and
    fewer than 7
    peer-reviewed
    scholarly sources)
    and/or sources are not
    integrated within the
    paper.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    20 pts

    Total Points: 200

    Research Paper Grading Rubric | BMAL710_B08_202620

    **## ResearchPaperAssignmentInstructions.docx**

    BMAL 710

    **Research Paper Assignment Instructions**

    **Overview**

    Select an organization of your choice that, you believe, is facing organizational issues. Make sure to select an organization that has publicly available information to substantiate your claims, and it cannot be an organization where you worked or are currently working. In 1-2 pages, provide a description of two to three problems identified. Your description need not be elaborate but should provide enough information to enable someone unfamiliar with the organizational issues to understand the focus of your study. This portion should be just the facts, a description, not an analysis of the key events. Make sure to support your assertions and information regarding existence of organizationl issues you are describing with supporting citations.

    After you have set the foundation, apply theories, concepts, and principles learned from the course to analyze your chosen organization and its identified problems. Make sure to support your analysis with supporting scholarly sources.

    Lastly, provide a personal and biblical perspectives that discuss what you would implement to address the problems to move the organization forward as part of the evolving changes for organizations today. Provide application of theories to your perspectives.

    **Instructions**

    Your paper must include:

    · Minimum 3000 words – body of the paper (not including the title page, abstract, and references)

    · Support from the Bible

    · Support from 10 scholarly, peer-reviewed sources

    · Support from the course textbook (Daft)

    · Support from Merida text

    · Title page

    · Abstract

    · Reference list

    · Adherence to the APA-7 Professional version format including but not limited to title page, headings, margins, page numbers, citations, references, font, line spacing, etc.

    When you reference the Bible for biblical integration, it is the holy Word of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ and it is not considered an academic, peer-reviewed source.

    Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

    **## ResearchPaperGradingRubric.pdf**

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Identification of
    Issues

    40 to >35 pts

    Advanced

    Presents articulate and
    detailed descriptions of
    the problems and
    issues central to the
    organization. Provides a
    well-focused diagnosis
    of strategic issues and
    key problems that
    demonstrate an
    excellent grasp of the
    situation and
    challenges; descriptions
    are compelling and
    insightful; provides a
    thorough and effective
    summary.

    35 to >27 pts

    Proficient

    With a few exceptions,
    identifies and outlines
    the principal problems
    and issues in the
    organization;
    demonstrates an
    acceptable
    understanding of the
    issues, situation, and
    challenges; summary
    provides an adequate
    overview of the case
    issues and problems.
    Summary is missing a
    few minor points but
    meets expectations.

    27 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Does not fully
    recognize the
    problems or identifies
    problems and issues
    that are not relevant;
    displays little
    understanding of the
    issues, key problems,
    the situation, and
    challenges. Summary
    does not present a
    clear overview of the
    case issues; the main
    points are not outlined
    or cannot be
    understood.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    40 pts

    Analysis and
    Evaluation

    50 to >44 pts

    Advanced

    Presents a balanced,
    in-depth, and critical
    assessment of the facts
    considering relevant
    empirical and
    theoretical research;
    develops insightful and
    well-supported
    conclusions using
    reasoned, sound, and
    informed judgments.
    Application to theories
    and organizational
    analysis of issues from
    the course concepts is
    well evidenced.

    44 to >34 pts

    Proficient

    Provides an acceptable
    analysis of most of the
    issues and problems; in
    most instances,
    analysis is adequately
    supported by theory
    and empirical data;
    appropriate conclusions
    are outlined and
    summarized.
    Application to theories
    and organizational
    analysis from the
    course concepts is
    somewhat evidenced.

    34 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Does not fully discuss
    the relevance of the
    facts; fails to draw
    conclusions, or
    conclusions are not
    justified or supported;
    does not fully present
    relevant research or
    data; shows no critical
    examination of issues.
    Application to theories
    and organizational
    analysis from the
    course concepts is not
    thoroughly applied.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    50 pts

    Research Paper Grading Rubric | BMAL710_B08_202620

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Personal/Biblical
    Perspective/Solutions

    50 to >44 pts

    Advanced

    Effectively weighs and
    assesses a variety of
    alternative actions that
    address the multiple
    issues central to the
    organization; proposes
    detailed plans of action;
    action plans are realistic
    and contain thorough
    and well-reasoned
    justifications. Various
    theories and biblical
    principles are well
    applied.

    44 to >34 pts

    Proficient

    Outlines and
    summarizes some
    alternative courses of
    action to deal with most
    of the issues and
    problems in the
    organization; in most
    instances, proposed
    action plans are
    outlined, are feasible,
    and based on relatively
    sound theory and
    evidence. Various
    theories and biblical
    principles are
    somewhat applied.

    34 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Has difficulty
    identifying alternatives
    and appropriate
    courses of action; few,
    if any, alternatives are
    presented, infeasible
    actions are proposed,
    action plans are not
    supported, or actions
    do not address the key
    issues and problems in
    the organization.
    Various theories and
    biblical principles are
    not thoroughly applied.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    50 pts

    Organization 10 to >8 pts

    Advanced

    Very well organized.
    The narrative has clarity
    and includes strong,
    clear and varied
    transitions linking
    sub-topics and main
    topic. The narrative
    flows well throughout.

    8 to >6 pts

    Proficient

    Well organized. The
    narrative has clarity
    and flows logically, and
    includes transitions
    linking subtopics and
    the topic. The narrative
    may not always flow
    well at some points.

    6 to >0 pts

    Developing

    Somewhat well
    organized, flows
    logically, and includes
    some attempts to
    provide a variety of
    transitions. The
    narrative may not flow
    well.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    10 pts

    APA Format (Cover
    page, references,
    margins, citations,
    pagination, headings,
    headers, abstract,
    etc.) Grammar and
    Spelling

    20 to >17 pts

    Advanced

    Proper, current APA
    format is used.
    Proper spelling and
    grammar are used.

    17 to >13 pts

    Proficient

    There are 1–2 current
    APA formatting errors
    present.
    There are 1–2 spelling
    and/or grammar errors
    present.

    13 to >0 pts

    Developing

    There are 3–4 current
    APA formatting errors
    present.
    There are 3–4 spelling
    and/or grammar errors
    present.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    20 pts

    Length 10 to >8 pts

    Advanced

    The submission is at
    least 3000 words.

    8 to >6 pts

    Proficient

    The submission is
    2500-2999 words.

    6 to >0 pts

    Developing

    The submission is less
    than 2500 words.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    10 pts

    Research Paper Grading Rubric | BMAL710_B08_202620

    Criteria Ratings Points

    Sources 20 to >17 pts

    Advanced

    The paper met or
    exceeded the required
    minimum number of
    sources (the Bible, the
    course textbook, the
    Merida textbook, and 10
    or more peer-reviewed
    scholarly sources).

    17 to >13 pts

    Proficient

    The paper includes
    some of the required
    sources (the Bible, the
    course textbook, the
    Merida textbook, and
    7 to 9 peer-reviewed
    scholarly sources)
    and/or sources are not
    well integrated within
    the paper.

    13 to >0 pts

    Developing

    The paper is missing
    most of the required
    sources (the Bible, the
    course textbook, the
    Merida textbook, and
    fewer than 7
    peer-reviewed
    scholarly sources)
    and/or sources are not
    integrated within the
    paper.

    0 pts

    Not
    Present

    20 pts

    Total Points: 200

    Research Paper Grading Rubric | BMAL710_B08_202620

  • [Solved] Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (1)** – ## PowerPointPresentation.docx **## PowerPointPresentation.docx** Power Point Presentation -Due Tuesday 2/24 by 1159 PM EST: Case Study Presentation: Strategies and Challenges for Nurse Leaders in Organizational Mergers/Acquisitions **Presentation Title:** _Strategies and Challenges …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (1)**

    – ## PowerPointPresentation.docx

    **## PowerPointPresentation.docx**

    Power Point Presentation -Due Tuesday 2/24 by 1159 PM EST: Case Study Presentation: Strategies and Challenges for Nurse Leaders in Organizational Mergers/Acquisitions

    **Presentation Title:** _Strategies and Challenges for Nurse Leaders in Organizational Mergers/Acquisitions_

    **Overview:** As we conclude this course, you have developed a broad range of leadership and management skills in the health industry. Your final task is to prepare a concise, scholarly PowerPoint presentation with a voiceover narrative and slide notes of the narration, aimed at a group of nurse leaders preparing for an organizational merger or acquisition. The goal is to discuss effective strategies and potential challenges to guide these leaders on a successful journey.

    **Presentation Requirements:**

    **Slide Deck Guidelines:**

    ·
    **Length:** Create a presentation with
    **4-6 slides [title and reference slide does not count]**.

    ·
    **Content Balance:**

    · Use minimal text on each slide—focus on key points to support your voiceover discussion.

    · Do not overcrowd or saturate the slides with information. Each slide should serve as a visual prompt for your detailed explanations.

    ·
    **Cover and Reference Slides:**

    ·
    **Cover Slide:** Include your presentation title, your name, the course title, institution, and the date.

    ·
    **Reference Slide:** At the end, include an APA-style slide that lists at least six scholarly references supporting your content.

    **Voiceover Narration:**

    · Record a clear, concise voiceover for each slide.

    · Your narration should expand on the slide content by discussing strategies and outlining challenges that nurse leaders may face during a merger or acquisition.

    · Demonstrate the application of evidence-based practice (EBP) by integrating relevant research, data, and scholarly insights into your discussion.

    **Content Focus:**

    ·
    **Strategic Insights:**

    · Present strategies that prepare nurse leaders for the changes and challenges inherent in mergers and acquisitions.

    ·
    **Challenges Discussion:**

    · Identify and explain potential challenges leaders may encounter, and offer evidence-based solutions or recommendations.

    · Support your discussion with a minimum of six [6] scholarly references that illustrate best practices, case studies, or current research findings in healthcare leadership.

    **Formatting and Submission:**

    ·
    **APA 7th Edition:** Ensure all content, including in-text references (if applicable) and the reference slide, adheres strictly to APA 7th Edition guidelines.

    ·
    **Scholarly Tone:** The presentation should reflect a high academic standard by integrating evidence-based practice and critical analysis.

    ·
    **Deadline:** Please be aware that late assignments will not be accepted.

    **REFERENCES Must have DOI Numbers for me to look them up- If I am unable to verify the references points will be deducted.**

    **Great resource to assist you:** [Reference List: Author/Authors – Purdue OWL® – Purdue University](https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/reference_list_author_authors.html)

    By following these guidelines, you will create a focused, engaging, and scholarly presentation that effectively communicates how nurse leaders can navigate the complexities of an organizational merger or acquisition. Good luck, and I look forward to hearing your thoughtful insights through your voiceover narration!

    **## PowerPointPresentation.docx**

    Power Point Presentation -Due Tuesday 2/24 by 1159 PM EST: Case Study Presentation: Strategies and Challenges for Nurse Leaders in Organizational Mergers/Acquisitions

    **Presentation Title:** _Strategies and Challenges for Nurse Leaders in Organizational Mergers/Acquisitions_

    **Overview:** As we conclude this course, you have developed a broad range of leadership and management skills in the health industry. Your final task is to prepare a concise, scholarly PowerPoint presentation with a voiceover narrative and slide notes of the narration, aimed at a group of nurse leaders preparing for an organizational merger or acquisition. The goal is to discuss effective strategies and potential challenges to guide these leaders on a successful journey.

    **Presentation Requirements:**

    **Slide Deck Guidelines:**

    ·
    **Length:** Create a presentation with
    **4-6 slides [title and reference slide does not count]**.

    ·
    **Content Balance:**

    · Use minimal text on each slide—focus on key points to support your voiceover discussion.

    · Do not overcrowd or saturate the slides with information. Each slide should serve as a visual prompt for your detailed explanations.

    ·
    **Cover and Reference Slides:**

    ·
    **Cover Slide:** Include your presentation title, your name, the course title, institution, and the date.

    ·
    **Reference Slide:** At the end, include an APA-style slide that lists at least six scholarly references supporting your content.

    **Voiceover Narration:**

    · Record a clear, concise voiceover for each slide.

    · Your narration should expand on the slide content by discussing strategies and outlining challenges that nurse leaders may face during a merger or acquisition.

    · Demonstrate the application of evidence-based practice (EBP) by integrating relevant research, data, and scholarly insights into your discussion.

    **Content Focus:**

    ·
    **Strategic Insights:**

    · Present strategies that prepare nurse leaders for the changes and challenges inherent in mergers and acquisitions.

    ·
    **Challenges Discussion:**

    · Identify and explain potential challenges leaders may encounter, and offer evidence-based solutions or recommendations.

    · Support your discussion with a minimum of six [6] scholarly references that illustrate best practices, case studies, or current research findings in healthcare leadership.

    **Formatting and Submission:**

    ·
    **APA 7th Edition:** Ensure all content, including in-text references (if applicable) and the reference slide, adheres strictly to APA 7th Edition guidelines.

    ·
    **Scholarly Tone:** The presentation should reflect a high academic standard by integrating evidence-based practice and critical analysis.

    ·
    **Deadline:** Please be aware that late assignments will not be accepted.

    **REFERENCES Must have DOI Numbers for me to look them up- If I am unable to verify the references points will be deducted.**

    **Great resource to assist you:** [Reference List: Author/Authors – Purdue OWL® – Purdue University](https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/reference_list_author_authors.html)

    By following these guidelines, you will create a focused, engaging, and scholarly presentation that effectively communicates how nurse leaders can navigate the complexities of an organizational merger or acquisition. Good luck, and I look forward to hearing your thoughtful insights through your voiceover narration!

  • [Solved] Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Follow rubric **files (3)** – ## QualityImprovementInitiativeProject.docx – ## StrategicDevelopmentPlanSt.MarysHospital1.pdf – ## RubricDetails.docx **## QualityImprovementInitiativeProject.docx** **MINIMUM of 10 pages** 12 scholarly references that are correctly APA 7th ed. citations. References cl…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Follow rubric

    **files (3)**

    – ## QualityImprovementInitiativeProject.docx

    – ## StrategicDevelopmentPlanSt.MarysHospital1.pdf

    – ## RubricDetails.docx

    **## QualityImprovementInitiativeProject.docx**

    **MINIMUM of 10 pages**

    12 scholarly references that are correctly APA 7th ed. citations. References clearly and thoroughly support the cited text within the paper. All REFERENCES have DOI Numbers for me to look them up. Plagiarism Checker: The assignment is submitted to SafeAssign in blackboard and the similarity index is between 20-25% matching throughout the paper

    Nursing Leadership and Management-DAX-DL01 Nora Hernandez-Pupo

    Quality Improvement Initiative Project

    **Assignment: Quality Improvement Initiative Project**

    **Overview**

    You are an advanced practice nurse (APN) leader at a fictional non-profit community hospital, St. Mary’s General Hospital. Your Chief Nursing Officer (CNO) has asked you to design and implement a hospital-wide Quality Improvement (QI) initiative that engages nurses and builds their QI skills.

    **Key Requirements**

    · Develop a comprehensive QI initiative that promotes nurse engagement and skill development

    · Demonstrate familiarity with QI processes, leadership approaches, and graduate-level critical analysis

    · Integrate evidence, best practices, and research from
    **at least 12** scholarly sources

    · Align your proposal with St. Mary’s mission, vision, and strategic plan (provided on Blackboard > Assignments)

    **Paper Structure & Grading**

    Follow the grading rubric precisely. Omitting or vaguely addressing any criterion will lower your grade or result in a non-pass. Each section below maps directly to the rubric:

    **Introduction**

    · State the purpose and scope of your QI initiative

    · Preview the paper’s structure

    **Background & Significance**

    · Define Quality Improvement and its importance to healthcare, patients, and stakeholders

    · Explain how QI connects to all nursing levels, emphasizing nurse leaders

    · Identify the first step your APN leader will take, including:

    · A specific QI tool or measure

    · Rationale for its selection

    · How to interpret and apply findings to guide decision-making

    **Initiative Development**

    · Outline strategies to engage nurses actively in QI

    · Describe leadership style(s) and approaches you will use

    · Detail resources, training, and support mechanisms

    **Implementation Plan**

    · Present a step-by-step rollout timeline

    · Assign responsibilities and communication channels

    **Evaluation & Sustainability**

    · Define clear metrics and data-collection methods

    · Explain how results will inform continuous improvement

    · Propose strategies to sustain nurse engagement over time

    **Conclusion**

    · Summarize key recommendations

    · Reflect on potential challenges and mitigation strategies

    **Resources & Submission Guidelines**

    · Download St. Mary’s Mission, Vision & Strategic Plan from Blackboard > Assignments.

    · Review the detailed grading rubric in the course shell.

    · You have one submission opportunity, late or incomplete work may not be accepted.

    · Refer to the syllabus for formatting, citation style, and grading policies.

    **Tips for Success**

    · Be specific and succinct, avoid vague statements.

    · Integrate multiple, credible sources; each reference must support a clear point.

    · Align every element of your proposal with the hospital’s strategic goals.

    · Proofread for clarity, coherence, and APA formatting.

    **Additional Resources You Might Explore**

    · Example QI tools: Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle, Root Cause Analysis, Lean methodologies

    · Leadership frameworks: Transformational, Servant, and Situational Leadership

    · Peer-reviewed journals on nursing QI best practices (e.g.,
    _Journal of Nursing Care Quality_,
    _BMJ Quality & Safety_)

    This assignment is to be submitted as an essay- with an introduction, questions developed at the graduate level, and a conclusion to summarize and synthesize key points. APA must be strictly followed. The page requirement for this project will be a
    **MINIMUM of 10 pages/ Maximum 15 pages [not counting references and the cover page]**. Penalty will be imposed for exceeding or not meeting the minimum page requirement.

    **REFERENCES Must have DOI Numbers for me to look them up- If I am unable to verify the references points will be deducted.**

    **Great resource to assist you:** [Reference List: Author/Authors – Purdue OWL® – Purdue University](https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/reference_list_author_authors.html)

    **StrategicDevelopmentPlanSt.MarysHospital.pdf**

    **Submission**

    Text Editor

    _Word count: 0_

    **Details & Information**

    **## StrategicDevelopmentPlanSt.MarysHospital1.pdf**

    STRATEGIC PLAN: ST MARY’S HOSPITAL SYSTEM

    1

    MISSION, VISION & VALUES:

    STRATEGIC PLAN: ST MARY’S HOSPITAL SYSTEM

    2

    STRATEGIC PLAN: ST MARY’S HOSPITAL SYSTEM

    3

    STRATEGIC PLAN:

    VISION 2026

    A Pledge from Our Leaders

    While simultaneously fighting the impacts of COVID-19, our progressive teams at St. Mary’s General Hospital have been planning

    with our community to chart a course for our future. It has galvanized our resolve to build on the compassion and excellence that

    defines St. Mary’s, and grow stronger and healthier together within our organization and with our rapidly expanding, diverse and

    innovative community.

    With this backdrop, we are excited to introduce St. Mary’s Strategic Plan, a vision for the next 5-7 years, with two-year objectives to

    propel us forward. We thank all who helped shape it – our staff, physicians, patients and families, local partners within and outside

    healthcare, and the broader community. Their input helped us develop a new Mission, a new set of Values and a new Vision:

    Inspiring Excellence. Healthier Together.

    As we implement this strategic plan, we will gauge progress and adjust to meet new challenges. We will enhance our role as providers

    of regional programs, and within a broader health system.

    Together with our regional partner hospitals, St. Mary’s will accelerate collaboration with our region’s post-secondary institutions and

    with Communitech, an innovation hub that supports local companies, some of which have a significant interest in advancing

    excellence in health care. Together we will consider the future of health care through these innovations and learnings.

    Five strategic priorities will guide our actions:

    1. expand equitable access to high quality

    2. empowered care

    3. transform connected care with our partners and community

    4. develop our team of today and the future

    5. embrace new ways to innovate healthcare; and build for growth

    All of this will bring focus to the diverse community we serve and ensure equity in care. Please join us as we evolve to serve you

    better

    STRATEGIC PLAN: ST MARY’S HOSPITAL SYSTEM

    4

    STRATEGIC PLAN: ST MARY’S HOSPITAL SYSTEM

    5

    STRATEGIC PLAN: ST MARY’S HOSPITAL SYSTEM

    6

    STRATEGIC PLAN: ST MARY’S HOSPITAL SYSTEM

    7

    STRATEGIC PLAN: ST MARY’S HOSPITAL SYSTEM

    8

    STRATEGIC PLAN: ST MARY’S HOSPITAL SYSTEM

    9

    Supporting Our Plan

    Across all of our strategic priorities there are foundational enablers that will be critical in supporting the achievement of our 2026

    strategic plan. Enablers are key elements that St. Mary’s must have in place to ensure successful implementation, sustainability and

    measurement of the strategy.

    Ensure our future fiscal sustainability Create a safe, healthy & sustainable place

    to work for all staff, physicians and

    volunteers
    LONG-TERM OBJECTIVE

    LONG-TERM OBJECTIVE

    • Ensure financial sustainability of St. Mary’s now and

    in the future in order to meet the growing needs of

    our community.

    • Build inspiring places to work that empower

    dedicated and healthy staff by ensuring sustainable

    support, care and growth opportunities

    • Increase our focus on diversity and inclusion in the

    way we work and do things.

    24 MONTH OBJECTIVES

    24 MONTH OBJECTIVES

    • Develop a robust financial strategy to address current

    gaps in funding.

    • Develop a strategic Health Human Resources plan

    • Identify new funding avenues with partners

    particularly in areas such as innovation

    • Improve the team retention rate

    • Implement a reinforcing management system that

    aligns with our vision and supports deployment and

    sustainment of strategic priorities.

    • Measure performance in achieving the strategic plan

    and priorities.

    **## RubricDetails.docx**

    Rubric Details

    **Maximum Score**

    100 points

    ·
    **Page limit is met: The page requirement for this project will be a MINIMUM of 10 pages/ Maximum 15 pages [not counting references and the cover page].**

    5% of total result

    **Excellent**

    Page limit is met: The page requirement for this project will be a MINIMUM of 10 pages/ Maximum 15 pages [not counting references and the cover page].

    **5**

    **Satisfactory**

    **0**

    **Unsatisfactory**

    **0**

    **Unacceptable**

    Page limit is either above or below the: The page requirement for this project will be a MINIMUM of 10 pages/ Maximum 15 pages [not counting references and the cover page].

    **0**

    ·
    **Introduction (Introduce the overall concepts that will be described in the student’s paper; not generic to the assignment outline)**

    5% of total result

    **Excellent**

    Clear and concise introduction of the concepts to be presented in the paper

    **5**

    **Satisfactory**

    Mostly clear but somewhat generic introduction of the concepts to presented in the paper

    **4**

    **3**

    **Unacceptable**

    The paper does not demonstrate that the author has understood, and applied concepts learned in the course.

    **0**

    ·
    **Background/Significance**

    10% of total result

    **Excellent**

    Identifies, describes and demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of QI as it relates to healthcare, patients, stakeholders, nurses at all levels of practice and APN nurse leaders. Correct and specific identification, outline, and support for the first step, tools, measures and application of findings needed by the APN leader to fulfill the QI initiative provided that is well supported with evidence and literature throughout.

    **10**

    ·
    **Personal/Profession Leadership**

    10% of total result

    **Excellent**

    Clear, detailed, and comprehensive description of the personal leadership style, professional and personal leadership competencies, & personal and professional qualities and skills necessary to be a successful nurse leader at the APN level to lead the QI initiative. This section also presents a clear & comprehensive discussion of how the APN will assess needed leadership skills and a specific plan for attaining these skills that is well supported by the literature, evidence, and research.

    **10**

    **4**

    ·
    **Detailed Plan (Toolkit) for QI Initiatives**

    10% of total result

    **Excellent**

    Clear, detailed, and comprehensive strategy outlining exactly how the nurse leader plans to develop the QI initiative which details the processes, education, tools and skills necessary for nurses to successfully initiate, plan, develop, evaluate and share insights for QI projects at St. Mary’s that can be presented to the CNO is provided. This plan is comprehensively and well supported by national QI initiatives, tools, best practice, evidence and research.

    **10**

    **4**

    ·
    **Alignment with Hospital Strategic Initiative**

    10% of total result

    **Excellent**

    Specific, detailed and clear description of how the QI initiative aligns with St. Mary’s mission, vision, and strategic plan is provided. There is a detailed outline of how the APN plans to measure the success of the QI initiative (includes both short & long-term goals) that aligns with one or more national QI initiative and is linked to the disciplinary knowledge of nursing. Well supported with literature, best practice, and evidence.

    **10**

    **0**

    ·
    **Nurse Engagement**

    10% of total result

    **Excellent**

    Clear, detailed and comprehensive strategy of how the APN leader will foster nurse engagement and buy-in for the planned QI initiative is provided. Detailed and comprehensive strategy for involving the NP in the QI initiative that is grounded in NP scope of practice using both primary and secondary sources. Well supported and comprehensive evidence, literature, and research provided.

    **10**

    **0**

    ·
    **APA formatting (paper is formatted per APA 7th edition guidelines including font, level of headings, appropriate number of references, in-text and reference list citations) Plagiarism Checker: The assignment is submitted to SafeAssign in blackboard and the similarity index is between 20-25% matching throughout the paper. Students are expected to know how to read their similarity index and correct for high similarity. REFERENCES Must have DOI Numbers for me to look them up.**

    10% of total result

    **Excellent**

    APA formatting is followed throughout the paper with correct citations and includes at least 12 scholarly references that are correctly APA 7th ed. citations. References clearly and thoroughly support the cited text within the paper. All REFERENCES have DOI Numbers for me to look them up. Plagiarism Checker: The assignment is submitted to SafeAssign in blackboard and the similarity index is between 20-25% matching throughout the paper

    **10**

    ·
    **Barriers & Facilitators**

    10% of total result

    **Excellent**

    Clear, detailed and comprehensive evaluation of barriers and facilitators likely to be encountered by the APN leader implementing the nursing QI initiative in practice settings. Specific and detailed strategies and examples are provided to address the main barriers that demonstrates a comprehensive understanding of QI process and the role of the APN leader. Well supported and comprehensive evidence, literature, and research provided.

    **10**

    **0**

    ·
    **Social Leadership**

    10% of total result

    **Excellent**

    Comprehensive examination of principles of social leadership that fully integrates these qualities as they relate to the role of APN leader in today’s healthcare environment with specific and detailed examples of how these qualities will be used by the APN leader to implement the QI initiative. Well supported and comprehensive evidence, literature, and research provided.

    **10**

    **0**

    ·
    **Conclusion/Summary**

    5% of total result

    **Excellent**

    Summarizes the key points made throughout the student paper in a succinct and comprehensive manner. Provides appropriate references and citations to support concluding comments.

    **5**

    **0**

    ·
    **Writing Mechanics: Language and direction of the paper follows the assignment outline and is clear and easy to follow**

    5% of total result

    **Excellent**

    Demonstrates clarity, conciseness and correctness. writing is free of grammar and spelling errors. The assignment outline was followed and guides the paper. The paper is developed using APA approved headings throughout the paper.

    **5**

    **## RubricDetails.docx**

    Rubric Details

    **Maximum Score**

    100 points

    ·
    **Page limit is met: The page requirement for this project will be a MINIMUM of 10 pages/ Maximum 15 pages [not counting references and the cover page].**

    5% of total result

    **Excellent**

    Page limit is met: The page requirement for this project will be a MINIMUM of 10 pages/ Maximum 15 pages [not counting references and the cover page].

    **5**

    **Satisfactory**

    **0**

    **Unsatisfactory**

    **0**

    **Unacceptable**

    Page limit is either above or below the: The page requirement for this project will be a MINIMUM of 10 pages/ Maximum 15 pages [not counting references and the cover page].

    **0**

    ·
    **Introduction (Introduce the overall concepts that will be described in the student’s paper; not generic to the assignment outline)**

    5% of total result

    **Excellent**

    Clear and concise introduction of the concepts to be presented in the paper

    **5**

    **Satisfactory**

    Mostly clear but somewhat generic introduction of the concepts to presented in the paper

    **4**

    **3**

    **Unacceptable**

    The paper does not demonstrate that the author has understood, and applied concepts learned in the course.

    **0**

    ·
    **Background/Significance**

    10% of total result

    **Excellent**

    Identifies, describes and demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of QI as it relates to healthcare, patients, stakeholders, nurses at all levels of practice and APN nurse leaders. Correct and specific identification, outline, and support for the first step, tools, measures and application of findings needed by the APN leader to fulfill the QI initiative provided that is well supported with evidence and literature throughout.

    **10**

    ·
    **Personal/Profession Leadership**

    10% of total result

    **Excellent**

    Clear, detailed, and comprehensive description of the personal leadership style, professional and personal leadership competencies, & personal and professional qualities and skills necessary to be a successful nurse leader at the APN level to lead the QI initiative. This section also presents a clear & comprehensive discussion of how the APN will assess needed leadership skills and a specific plan for attaining these skills that is well supported by the literature, evidence, and research.

    **10**

    **4**

    ·
    **Detailed Plan (Toolkit) for QI Initiatives**

    10% of total result

    **Excellent**

    Clear, detailed, and comprehensive strategy outlining exactly how the nurse leader plans to develop the QI initiative which details the processes, education, tools and skills necessary for nurses to successfully initiate, plan, develop, evaluate and share insights for QI projects at St. Mary’s that can be presented to the CNO is provided. This plan is comprehensively and well supported by national QI initiatives, tools, best practice, evidence and research.

    **10**

    **4**

    ·
    **Alignment with Hospital Strategic Initiative**

    10% of total result

    **Excellent**

    Specific, detailed and clear description of how the QI initiative aligns with St. Mary’s mission, vision, and strategic plan is provided. There is a detailed outline of how the APN plans to measure the success of the QI initiative (includes both short & long-term goals) that aligns with one or more national QI initiative and is linked to the disciplinary knowledge of nursing. Well supported with literature, best practice, and evidence.

    **10**

    **0**

    ·
    **Nurse Engagement**

    10% of total result

    **Excellent**

    Clear, detailed and comprehensive strategy of how the APN leader will foster nurse engagement and buy-in for the planned QI initiative is provided. Detailed and comprehensive strategy for involving the NP in the QI initiative that is grounded in NP scope of practice using both primary and secondary sources. Well supported and comprehensive evidence, literature, and research provided.

    **10**

    **0**

    ·
    **APA formatting (paper is formatted per APA 7th edition guidelines including font, level of headings, appropriate number of references, in-text and reference list citations) Plagiarism Checker: The assignment is submitted to SafeAssign in blackboard and the similarity index is between 20-25% matching throughout the paper. Students are expected to know how to read their similarity index and correct for high similarity. REFERENCES Must have DOI Numbers for me to look them up.**

    10% of total result

    **Excellent**

    APA formatting is followed throughout the paper with correct citations and includes at least 12 scholarly references that are correctly APA 7th ed. citations. References clearly and thoroughly support the cited text within the paper. All REFERENCES have DOI Numbers for me to look them up. Plagiarism Checker: The assignment is submitted to SafeAssign in blackboard and the similarity index is between 20-25% matching throughout the paper

    **10**

    ·
    **Barriers & Facilitators**

    10% of total result

    **Excellent**

    Clear, detailed and comprehensive evaluation of barriers and facilitators likely to be encountered by the APN leader implementing the nursing QI initiative in practice settings. Specific and detailed strategies and examples are provided to address the main barriers that demonstrates a comprehensive understanding of QI process and the role of the APN leader. Well supported and comprehensive evidence, literature, and research provided.

    **10**

    **0**

    ·
    **Social Leadership**

    10% of total result

    **Excellent**

    Comprehensive examination of principles of social leadership that fully integrates these qualities as they relate to the role of APN leader in today’s healthcare environment with specific and detailed examples of how these qualities will be used by the APN leader to implement the QI initiative. Well supported and comprehensive evidence, literature, and research provided.

    **10**

    **0**

    ·
    **Conclusion/Summary**

    5% of total result

    **Excellent**

    Summarizes the key points made throughout the student paper in a succinct and comprehensive manner. Provides appropriate references and citations to support concluding comments.

    **5**

    **0**

    ·
    **Writing Mechanics: Language and direction of the paper follows the assignment outline and is clear and easy to follow**

    5% of total result

    **Excellent**

    Demonstrates clarity, conciseness and correctness. writing is free of grammar and spelling errors. The assignment outline was followed and guides the paper. The paper is developed using APA approved headings throughout the paper.

    **5**

    **## QualityImprovementInitiativeProject.docx**

    **MINIMUM of 10 pages**

    12 scholarly references that are correctly APA 7th ed. citations. References clearly and thoroughly support the cited text within the paper. All REFERENCES have DOI Numbers for me to look them up. Plagiarism Checker: The assignment is submitted to SafeAssign in blackboard and the similarity index is between 20-25% matching throughout the paper

    Nursing Leadership and Management-DAX-DL01 Nora Hernandez-Pupo

    Quality Improvement Initiative Project

    **Assignment: Quality Improvement Initiative Project**

    **Overview**

    You are an advanced practice nurse (APN) leader at a fictional non-profit community hospital, St. Mary’s General Hospital. Your Chief Nursing Officer (CNO) has asked you to design and implement a hospital-wide Quality Improvement (QI) initiative that engages nurses and builds their QI skills.

    **Key Requirements**

    · Develop a comprehensive QI initiative that promotes nurse engagement and skill development

    · Demonstrate familiarity with QI processes, leadership approaches, and graduate-level critical analysis

    · Integrate evidence, best practices, and research from
    **at least 12** scholarly sources

    · Align your proposal with St. Mary’s mission, vision, and strategic plan (provided on Blackboard > Assignments)

    **Paper Structure & Grading**

    Follow the grading rubric precisely. Omitting or vaguely addressing any criterion will lower your grade or result in a non-pass. Each section below maps directly to the rubric:

    **Introduction**

    · State the purpose and scope of your QI initiative

    · Preview the paper’s structure

    **Background & Significance**

    · Define Quality Improvement and its importance to healthcare, patients, and stakeholders

    · Explain how QI connects to all nursing levels, emphasizing nurse leaders

    · Identify the first step your APN leader will take, including:

    · A specific QI tool or measure

    · Rationale for its selection

    · How to interpret and apply findings to guide decision-making

    **Initiative Development**

    · Outline strategies to engage nurses actively in QI

    · Describe leadership style(s) and approaches you will use

    · Detail resources, training, and support mechanisms

    **Implementation Plan**

    · Present a step-by-step rollout timeline

    · Assign responsibilities and communication channels

    **Evaluation & Sustainability**

    · Define clear metrics and data-collection methods

    · Explain how results will inform continuous improvement

    · Propose strategies to sustain nurse engagement over time

    **Conclusion**

    · Summarize key recommendations

    · Reflect on potential challenges and mitigation strategies

    **Resources & Submission Guidelines**

    · Download St. Mary’s Mission, Vision & Strategic Plan from Blackboard > Assignments.

    · Review the detailed grading rubric in the course shell.

    · You have one submission opportunity, late or incomplete work may not be accepted.

    · Refer to the syllabus for formatting, citation style, and grading policies.

    **Tips for Success**

    · Be specific and succinct, avoid vague statements.

    · Integrate multiple, credible sources; each reference must support a clear point.

    · Align every element of your proposal with the hospital’s strategic goals.

    · Proofread for clarity, coherence, and APA formatting.

    **Additional Resources You Might Explore**

    · Example QI tools: Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle, Root Cause Analysis, Lean methodologies

    · Leadership frameworks: Transformational, Servant, and Situational Leadership

    · Peer-reviewed journals on nursing QI best practices (e.g.,
    _Journal of Nursing Care Quality_,
    _BMJ Quality & Safety_)

    This assignment is to be submitted as an essay- with an introduction, questions developed at the graduate level, and a conclusion to summarize and synthesize key points. APA must be strictly followed. The page requirement for this project will be a
    **MINIMUM of 10 pages/ Maximum 15 pages [not counting references and the cover page]**. Penalty will be imposed for exceeding or not meeting the minimum page requirement.

    **REFERENCES Must have DOI Numbers for me to look them up- If I am unable to verify the references points will be deducted.**

    **Great resource to assist you:** [Reference List: Author/Authors – Purdue OWL® – Purdue University](https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/reference_list_author_authors.html)

    **StrategicDevelopmentPlanSt.MarysHospital.pdf**

    **Submission**

    Text Editor

    _Word count: 0_

    **Details & Information**

    **## StrategicDevelopmentPlanSt.MarysHospital1.pdf**

    STRATEGIC PLAN: ST MARY’S HOSPITAL SYSTEM

    1

    MISSION, VISION & VALUES:

    STRATEGIC PLAN: ST MARY’S HOSPITAL SYSTEM

    2

    STRATEGIC PLAN: ST MARY’S HOSPITAL SYSTEM

    3

    STRATEGIC PLAN:

    VISION 2026

    A Pledge from Our Leaders

    While simultaneously fighting the impacts of COVID-19, our progressive teams at St. Mary’s General Hospital have been planning

    with our community to chart a course for our future. It has galvanized our resolve to build on the compassion and excellence that

    defines St. Mary’s, and grow stronger and healthier together within our organization and with our rapidly expanding, diverse and

    innovative community.

    With this backdrop, we are excited to introduce St. Mary’s Strategic Plan, a vision for the next 5-7 years, with two-year objectives to

    propel us forward. We thank all who helped shape it – our staff, physicians, patients and families, local partners within and outside

    healthcare, and the broader community. Their input helped us develop a new Mission, a new set of Values and a new Vision:

    Inspiring Excellence. Healthier Together.

    As we implement this strategic plan, we will gauge progress and adjust to meet new challenges. We will enhance our role as providers

    of regional programs, and within a broader health system.

    Together with our regional partner hospitals, St. Mary’s will accelerate collaboration with our region’s post-secondary institutions and

    with Communitech, an innovation hub that supports local companies, some of which have a significant interest in advancing

    excellence in health care. Together we will consider the future of health care through these innovations and learnings.

    Five strategic priorities will guide our actions:

    1. expand equitable access to high quality

    2. empowered care

    3. transform connected care with our partners and community

    4. develop our team of today and the future

    5. embrace new ways to innovate healthcare; and build for growth

    All of this will bring focus to the diverse community we serve and ensure equity in care. Please join us as we evolve to serve you

    better

    STRATEGIC PLAN: ST MARY’S HOSPITAL SYSTEM

    4

    STRATEGIC PLAN: ST MARY’S HOSPITAL SYSTEM

    5

    STRATEGIC PLAN: ST MARY’S HOSPITAL SYSTEM

    6

    STRATEGIC PLAN: ST MARY’S HOSPITAL SYSTEM

    7

    STRATEGIC PLAN: ST MARY’S HOSPITAL SYSTEM

    8

    STRATEGIC PLAN: ST MARY’S HOSPITAL SYSTEM

    9

    Supporting Our Plan

    Across all of our strategic priorities there are foundational enablers that will be critical in supporting the achievement of our 2026

    strategic plan. Enablers are key elements that St. Mary’s must have in place to ensure successful implementation, sustainability and

    measurement of the strategy.

    Ensure our future fiscal sustainability Create a safe, healthy & sustainable place

    to work for all staff, physicians and

    volunteers
    LONG-TERM OBJECTIVE

    LONG-TERM OBJECTIVE

    • Ensure financial sustainability of St. Mary’s now and

    in the future in order to meet the growing needs of

    our community.

    • Build inspiring places to work that empower

    dedicated and healthy staff by ensuring sustainable

    support, care and growth opportunities

    • Increase our focus on diversity and inclusion in the

    way we work and do things.

    24 MONTH OBJECTIVES

    24 MONTH OBJECTIVES

    • Develop a robust financial strategy to address current

    gaps in funding.

    • Develop a strategic Health Human Resources plan

    • Identify new funding avenues with partners

    particularly in areas such as innovation

    • Improve the team retention rate

    • Implement a reinforcing management system that

    aligns with our vision and supports deployment and

    sustainment of strategic priorities.

    • Measure performance in achieving the strategic plan

    and priorities.

    **## RubricDetails.docx**

    Rubric Details

    **Maximum Score**

    100 points

    ·
    **Page limit is met: The page requirement for this project will be a MINIMUM of 10 pages/ Maximum 15 pages [not counting references and the cover page].**

    5% of total result

    **Excellent**

    Page limit is met: The page requirement for this project will be a MINIMUM of 10 pages/ Maximum 15 pages [not counting references and the cover page].

    **5**

    **Satisfactory**

    **0**

    **Unsatisfactory**

    **0**

    **Unacceptable**

    Page limit is either above or below the: The page requirement for this project will be a MINIMUM of 10 pages/ Maximum 15 pages [not counting references and the cover page].

    **0**

    ·
    **Introduction (Introduce the overall concepts that will be described in the student’s paper; not generic to the assignment outline)**

    5% of total result

    **Excellent**

    Clear and concise introduction of the concepts to be presented in the paper

    **5**

    **Satisfactory**

    Mostly clear but somewhat generic introduction of the concepts to presented in the paper

    **4**

    **3**

    **Unacceptable**

    The paper does not demonstrate that the author has understood, and applied concepts learned in the course.

    **0**

    ·
    **Background/Significance**

    10% of total result

    **Excellent**

    Identifies, describes and demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of QI as it relates to healthcare, patients, stakeholders, nurses at all levels of practice and APN nurse leaders. Correct and specific identification, outline, and support for the first step, tools, measures and application of findings needed by the APN leader to fulfill the QI initiative provided that is well supported with evidence and literature throughout.

    **10**

    ·
    **Personal/Profession Leadership**

    10% of total result

    **Excellent**

    Clear, detailed, and comprehensive description of the personal leadership style, professional and personal leadership competencies, & personal and professional qualities and skills necessary to be a successful nurse leader at the APN level to lead the QI initiative. This section also presents a clear & comprehensive discussion of how the APN will assess needed leadership skills and a specific plan for attaining these skills that is well supported by the literature, evidence, and research.

    **10**

    **4**

    ·
    **Detailed Plan (Toolkit) for QI Initiatives**

    10% of total result

    **Excellent**

    Clear, detailed, and comprehensive strategy outlining exactly how the nurse leader plans to develop the QI initiative which details the processes, education, tools and skills necessary for nurses to successfully initiate, plan, develop, evaluate and share insights for QI projects at St. Mary’s that can be presented to the CNO is provided. This plan is comprehensively and well supported by national QI initiatives, tools, best practice, evidence and research.

    **10**

    **4**

    ·
    **Alignment with Hospital Strategic Initiative**

    10% of total result

    **Excellent**

    Specific, detailed and clear description of how the QI initiative aligns with St. Mary’s mission, vision, and strategic plan is provided. There is a detailed outline of how the APN plans to measure the success of the QI initiative (includes both short & long-term goals) that aligns with one or more national QI initiative and is linked to the disciplinary knowledge of nursing. Well supported with literature, best practice, and evidence.

    **10**

    **0**

    ·
    **Nurse Engagement**

    10% of total result

    **Excellent**

    Clear, detailed and comprehensive strategy of how the APN leader will foster nurse engagement and buy-in for the planned QI initiative is provided. Detailed and comprehensive strategy for involving the NP in the QI initiative that is grounded in NP scope of practice using both primary and secondary sources. Well supported and comprehensive evidence, literature, and research provided.

    **10**

    **0**

    ·
    **APA formatting (paper is formatted per APA 7th edition guidelines including font, level of headings, appropriate number of references, in-text and reference list citations) Plagiarism Checker: The assignment is submitted to SafeAssign in blackboard and the similarity index is between 20-25% matching throughout the paper. Students are expected to know how to read their similarity index and correct for high similarity. REFERENCES Must have DOI Numbers for me to look them up.**

    10% of total result

    **Excellent**

    APA formatting is followed throughout the paper with correct citations and includes at least 12 scholarly references that are correctly APA 7th ed. citations. References clearly and thoroughly support the cited text within the paper. All REFERENCES have DOI Numbers for me to look them up. Plagiarism Checker: The assignment is submitted to SafeAssign in blackboard and the similarity index is between 20-25% matching throughout the paper

    **10**

    ·
    **Barriers & Facilitators**

    10% of total result

    **Excellent**

    Clear, detailed and comprehensive evaluation of barriers and facilitators likely to be encountered by the APN leader implementing the nursing QI initiative in practice settings. Specific and detailed strategies and examples are provided to address the main barriers that demonstrates a comprehensive understanding of QI process and the role of the APN leader. Well supported and comprehensive evidence, literature, and research provided.

    **10**

    **0**

    ·
    **Social Leadership**

    10% of total result

    **Excellent**

    Comprehensive examination of principles of social leadership that fully integrates these qualities as they relate to the role of APN leader in today’s healthcare environment with specific and detailed examples of how these qualities will be used by the APN leader to implement the QI initiative. Well supported and comprehensive evidence, literature, and research provided.

    **10**

    **0**

    ·
    **Conclusion/Summary**

    5% of total result

    **Excellent**

    Summarizes the key points made throughout the student paper in a succinct and comprehensive manner. Provides appropriate references and citations to support concluding comments.

    **5**

    **0**

    ·
    **Writing Mechanics: Language and direction of the paper follows the assignment outline and is clear and easy to follow**

    5% of total result

    **Excellent**

    Demonstrates clarity, conciseness and correctness. writing is free of grammar and spelling errors. The assignment outline was followed and guides the paper. The paper is developed using APA approved headings throughout the paper.

    **5**

    **## QualityImprovementInitiativeProject.docx**

    **MINIMUM of 10 pages**

    12 scholarly references that are correctly APA 7th ed. citations. References clearly and thoroughly support the cited text within the paper. All REFERENCES have DOI Numbers for me to look them up. Plagiarism Checker: The assignment is submitted to SafeAssign in blackboard and the similarity index is between 20-25% matching throughout the paper

    Nursing Leadership and Management-DAX-DL01 Nora Hernandez-Pupo

    Quality Improvement Initiative Project

    **Assignment: Quality Improvement Initiative Project**

    **Overview**

    You are an advanced practice nurse (APN) leader at a fictional non-profit community hospital, St. Mary’s General Hospital. Your Chief Nursing Officer (CNO) has asked you to design and implement a hospital-wide Quality Improvement (QI) initiative that engages nurses and builds their QI skills.

    **Key Requirements**

    · Develop a comprehensive QI initiative that promotes nurse engagement and skill development

    · Demonstrate familiarity with QI processes, leadership approaches, and graduate-level critical analysis

    · Integrate evidence, best practices, and research from
    **at least 12** scholarly sources

    · Align your proposal with St. Mary’s mission, vision, and strategic plan (provided on Blackboard > Assignments)

    **Paper Structure & Grading**

    Follow the grading rubric precisely. Omitting or vaguely addressing any criterion will lower your grade or result in a non-pass. Each section below maps directly to the rubric:

    **Introduction**

    · State the purpose and scope of your QI initiative

    · Preview the paper’s structure

    **Background & Significance**

    · Define Quality Improvement and its importance to healthcare, patients, and stakeholders

    · Explain how QI connects to all nursing levels, emphasizing nurse leaders

    · Identify the first step your APN leader will take, including:

    · A specific QI tool or measure

    · Rationale for its selection

    · How to interpret and apply findings to guide decision-making

    **Initiative Development**

    · Outline strategies to engage nurses actively in QI

    · Describe leadership style(s) and approaches you will use

    · Detail resources, training, and support mechanisms

    **Implementation Plan**

    · Present a step-by-step rollout timeline

    · Assign responsibilities and communication channels

    **Evaluation & Sustainability**

    · Define clear metrics and data-collection methods

    · Explain how results will inform continuous improvement

    · Propose strategies to sustain nurse engagement over time

    **Conclusion**

    · Summarize key recommendations

    · Reflect on potential challenges and mitigation strategies

    **Resources & Submission Guidelines**

    · Download St. Mary’s Mission, Vision & Strategic Plan from Blackboard > Assignments.

    · Review the detailed grading rubric in the course shell.

    · You have one submission opportunity, late or incomplete work may not be accepted.

    · Refer to the syllabus for formatting, citation style, and grading policies.

    **Tips for Success**

    · Be specific and succinct, avoid vague statements.

    · Integrate multiple, credible sources; each reference must support a clear point.

    · Align every element of your proposal with the hospital’s strategic goals.

    · Proofread for clarity, coherence, and APA formatting.

    **Additional Resources You Might Explore**

    · Example QI tools: Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle, Root Cause Analysis, Lean methodologies

    · Leadership frameworks: Transformational, Servant, and Situational Leadership

    · Peer-reviewed journals on nursing QI best practices (e.g.,
    _Journal of Nursing Care Quality_,
    _BMJ Quality & Safety_)

    This assignment is to be submitted as an essay- with an introduction, questions developed at the graduate level, and a conclusion to summarize and synthesize key points. APA must be strictly followed. The page requirement for this project will be a
    **MINIMUM of 10 pages/ Maximum 15 pages [not counting references and the cover page]**. Penalty will be imposed for exceeding or not meeting the minimum page requirement.

    **REFERENCES Must have DOI Numbers for me to look them up- If I am unable to verify the references points will be deducted.**

    **Great resource to assist you:** [Reference List: Author/Authors – Purdue OWL® – Purdue University](https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/reference_list_author_authors.html)

    **StrategicDevelopmentPlanSt.MarysHospital.pdf**

    **Submission**

    Text Editor

    _Word count: 0_

    **Details & Information**

    **## StrategicDevelopmentPlanSt.MarysHospital1.pdf**

    STRATEGIC PLAN: ST MARY’S HOSPITAL SYSTEM

    1

    MISSION, VISION & VALUES:

    STRATEGIC PLAN: ST MARY’S HOSPITAL SYSTEM

    2

    STRATEGIC PLAN: ST MARY’S HOSPITAL SYSTEM

    3

    STRATEGIC PLAN:

    VISION 2026

    A Pledge from Our Leaders

    While simultaneously fighting the impacts of COVID-19, our progressive teams at St. Mary’s General Hospital have been planning

    with our community to chart a course for our future. It has galvanized our resolve to build on the compassion and excellence that

    defines St. Mary’s, and grow stronger and healthier together within our organization and with our rapidly expanding, diverse and

    innovative community.

    With this backdrop, we are excited to introduce St. Mary’s Strategic Plan, a vision for the next 5-7 years, with two-year objectives to

    propel us forward. We thank all who helped shape it – our staff, physicians, patients and families, local partners within and outside

    healthcare, and the broader community. Their input helped us develop a new Mission, a new set of Values and a new Vision:

    Inspiring Excellence. Healthier Together.

    As we implement this strategic plan, we will gauge progress and adjust to meet new challenges. We will enhance our role as providers

    of regional programs, and within a broader health system.

    Together with our regional partner hospitals, St. Mary’s will accelerate collaboration with our region’s post-secondary institutions and

    with Communitech, an innovation hub that supports local companies, some of which have a significant interest in advancing

    excellence in health care. Together we will consider the future of health care through these innovations and learnings.

    Five strategic priorities will guide our actions:

    1. expand equitable access to high quality

    2. empowered care

    3. transform connected care with our partners and community

    4. develop our team of today and the future

    5. embrace new ways to innovate healthcare; and build for growth

    All of this will bring focus to the diverse community we serve and ensure equity in care. Please join us as we evolve to serve you

    better

    STRATEGIC PLAN: ST MARY’S HOSPITAL SYSTEM

    4

    STRATEGIC PLAN: ST MARY’S HOSPITAL SYSTEM

    5

    STRATEGIC PLAN: ST MARY’S HOSPITAL SYSTEM

    6

    STRATEGIC PLAN: ST MARY’S HOSPITAL SYSTEM

    7

    STRATEGIC PLAN: ST MARY’S HOSPITAL SYSTEM

    8

    STRATEGIC PLAN: ST MARY’S HOSPITAL SYSTEM

    9

    Supporting Our Plan

    Across all of our strategic priorities there are foundational enablers that will be critical in supporting the achievement of our 2026

    strategic plan. Enablers are key elements that St. Mary’s must have in place to ensure successful implementation, sustainability and

    measurement of the strategy.

    Ensure our future fiscal sustainability Create a safe, healthy & sustainable place

    to work for all staff, physicians and

    volunteers
    LONG-TERM OBJECTIVE

    LONG-TERM OBJECTIVE

    • Ensure financial sustainability of St. Mary’s now and

    in the future in order to meet the growing needs of

    our community.

    • Build inspiring places to work that empower

    dedicated and healthy staff by ensuring sustainable

    support, care and growth opportunities

    • Increase our focus on diversity and inclusion in the

    way we work and do things.

    24 MONTH OBJECTIVES

    24 MONTH OBJECTIVES

    • Develop a robust financial strategy to address current

    gaps in funding.

    • Develop a strategic Health Human Resources plan

    • Identify new funding avenues with partners

    particularly in areas such as innovation

    • Improve the team retention rate

    • Implement a reinforcing management system that

    aligns with our vision and supports deployment and

    sustainment of strategic priorities.

    • Measure performance in achieving the strategic plan

    and priorities.

    **## RubricDetails.docx**

    Rubric Details

    **Maximum Score**

    100 points

    ·
    **Page limit is met: The page requirement for this project will be a MINIMUM of 10 pages/ Maximum 15 pages [not counting references and the cover page].**

    5% of total result

    **Excellent**

    Page limit is met: The page requirement for this project will be a MINIMUM of 10 pages/ Maximum 15 pages [not counting references and the cover page].

    **5**

    **Satisfactory**

    **0**

    **Unsatisfactory**

    **0**

    **Unacceptable**

    Page limit is either above or below the: The page requirement for this project will be a MINIMUM of 10 pages/ Maximum 15 pages [not counting references and the cover page].

    **0**

    ·
    **Introduction (Introduce the overall concepts that will be described in the student’s paper; not generic to the assignment outline)**

    5% of total result

    **Excellent**

    Clear and concise introduction of the concepts to be presented in the paper

    **5**

    **Satisfactory**

    Mostly clear but somewhat generic introduction of the concepts to presented in the paper

    **4**

    **3**

    **Unacceptable**

    The paper does not demonstrate that the author has understood, and applied concepts learned in the course.

    **0**

    ·
    **Background/Significance**

    10% of total result

    **Excellent**

    Identifies, describes and demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of QI as it relates to healthcare, patients, stakeholders, nurses at all levels of practice and APN nurse leaders. Correct and specific identification, outline, and support for the first step, tools, measures and application of findings needed by the APN leader to fulfill the QI initiative provided that is well supported with evidence and literature throughout.

    **10**

    ·
    **Personal/Profession Leadership**

    10% of total result

    **Excellent**

    Clear, detailed, and comprehensive description of the personal leadership style, professional and personal leadership competencies, & personal and professional qualities and skills necessary to be a successful nurse leader at the APN level to lead the QI initiative. This section also presents a clear & comprehensive discussion of how the APN will assess needed leadership skills and a specific plan for attaining these skills that is well supported by the literature, evidence, and research.

    **10**

    **4**

    ·
    **Detailed Plan (Toolkit) for QI Initiatives**

    10% of total result

    **Excellent**

    Clear, detailed, and comprehensive strategy outlining exactly how the nurse leader plans to develop the QI initiative which details the processes, education, tools and skills necessary for nurses to successfully initiate, plan, develop, evaluate and share insights for QI projects at St. Mary’s that can be presented to the CNO is provided. This plan is comprehensively and well supported by national QI initiatives, tools, best practice, evidence and research.

    **10**

    **4**

    ·
    **Alignment with Hospital Strategic Initiative**

    10% of total result

    **Excellent**

    Specific, detailed and clear description of how the QI initiative aligns with St. Mary’s mission, vision, and strategic plan is provided. There is a detailed outline of how the APN plans to measure the success of the QI initiative (includes both short & long-term goals) that aligns with one or more national QI initiative and is linked to the disciplinary knowledge of nursing. Well supported with literature, best practice, and evidence.

    **10**

    **0**

    ·
    **Nurse Engagement**

    10% of total result

    **Excellent**

    Clear, detailed and comprehensive strategy of how the APN leader will foster nurse engagement and buy-in for the planned QI initiative is provided. Detailed and comprehensive strategy for involving the NP in the QI initiative that is grounded in NP scope of practice using both primary and secondary sources. Well supported and comprehensive evidence, literature, and research provided.

    **10**

    **0**

    ·
    **APA formatting (paper is formatted per APA 7th edition guidelines including font, level of headings, appropriate number of references, in-text and reference list citations) Plagiarism Checker: The assignment is submitted to SafeAssign in blackboard and the similarity index is between 20-25% matching throughout the paper. Students are expected to know how to read their similarity index and correct for high similarity. REFERENCES Must have DOI Numbers for me to look them up.**

    10% of total result

    **Excellent**

    APA formatting is followed throughout the paper with correct citations and includes at least 12 scholarly references that are correctly APA 7th ed. citations. References clearly and thoroughly support the cited text within the paper. All REFERENCES have DOI Numbers for me to look them up. Plagiarism Checker: The assignment is submitted to SafeAssign in blackboard and the similarity index is between 20-25% matching throughout the paper

    **10**

    ·
    **Barriers & Facilitators**

    10% of total result

    **Excellent**

    Clear, detailed and comprehensive evaluation of barriers and facilitators likely to be encountered by the APN leader implementing the nursing QI initiative in practice settings. Specific and detailed strategies and examples are provided to address the main barriers that demonstrates a comprehensive understanding of QI process and the role of the APN leader. Well supported and comprehensive evidence, literature, and research provided.

    **10**

    **0**

    ·
    **Social Leadership**

    10% of total result

    **Excellent**

    Comprehensive examination of principles of social leadership that fully integrates these qualities as they relate to the role of APN leader in today’s healthcare environment with specific and detailed examples of how these qualities will be used by the APN leader to implement the QI initiative. Well supported and comprehensive evidence, literature, and research provided.

    **10**

    **0**

    ·
    **Conclusion/Summary**

    5% of total result

    **Excellent**

    Summarizes the key points made throughout the student paper in a succinct and comprehensive manner. Provides appropriate references and citations to support concluding comments.

    **5**

    **0**

    ·
    **Writing Mechanics: Language and direction of the paper follows the assignment outline and is clear and easy to follow**

    5% of total result

    **Excellent**

    Demonstrates clarity, conciseness and correctness. writing is free of grammar and spelling errors. The assignment outline was followed and guides the paper. The paper is developed using APA approved headings throughout the paper.

    **5**

  • [Solved] week 7 disc

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    A 6-year-old has a yellow vaginal discharge. The examination is otherwise normal. – What are key points in the history and physical examination? – How would you approach differ if the patient were a sexually active 16-year-old? – What are similarities and differences in the approach? **Submission In…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    A 6-year-old has a yellow vaginal discharge. The examination is otherwise normal.

    – What are key points in the history and physical examination?
    – How would you approach differ if the patient were a sexually active 16-year-old?
    – What are similarities and differences in the approach?

    **Submission Instructions:**

    – Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources.

  • [Solved] MS ACCESS

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Need to do a Microsoft Access document for my work. **files (2)** – ## ASSIGNMENT5COMPLETEWORD.docx – ASSIGNMENT5DUEFEB9.docx **## ASSIGNMENT5COMPLETEWORD.docx** 2 **Consideration of MS Access Database Development on Healthcare.** Name Instructor School Date **Consideration of MS Access Database Dev…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Need to do a Microsoft Access document for my work.

    **files (2)**

    – ## ASSIGNMENT5COMPLETEWORD.docx

    – ASSIGNMENT5DUEFEB9.docx

    **## ASSIGNMENT5COMPLETEWORD.docx**

    2

    **Consideration of MS Access Database Development on Healthcare.**

    Name

    Instructor

    School

    Date

    **Consideration of MS Access Database Development on Healthcare.**

    **Introduction**

    The task entailed developing a Microsoft access database of a small healthcare facility, which has just abandoned the use of paper-based records and has introduced the use of a digital system. The database consisted of a Patient Table which had defined fields, inputting of data in Datasheet View, a form creation of the additional records, a grouped report and two queries. I used my last name as the file name which was named as ken.accdb. This was done to simulate a real-world database development within the healthcare sector with a focus on data organization, retrieval, and analysis. The queries, their results, and managerial applications are enumerated below after which I provide a reflection on the process.

    **Query 1: Patients Who Visited last year (2019).**

    | | | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **Patient #** | **Last Name** | **First Name** | **Address** | **State** | **Zip Code** | **First Visit** | **Balance** |
    | 54783 | Williams | Jack | 62 Smith Lane | MD | 21202 | 2019 | 250 |
    | 64589 | Metheny | Alexa | 125 Fairview | MD | 21203 | 2019 | 200 |
    | 95874 | Van Wegan | Alison | 100 Quantico | MD | 21204 | 2019 | 350 |
    | 23895 | Jackson | Ryan | 2320 Hills Circle | VA | 20147 | 2020 | 325 |
    | 96312 | Berstein | Krista | 126 South Street | VA | 20148 | 2020 | 290 |
    | 54387 | Wylliams | Karen | 43 Jones Ave. | VA | 22193 | 2021 | 200 |
    | 54123 | Ken | Ken | 123 Main St | VA | 22191 | 2021 | 315 |
    | 36987 | Booy | Aaron | 21 Fairview Lane Ashburn | VA | 20146 | 2020 | 250 |
    | 76213 | McBurney | Colton | 45 Trotters Drive Hagerstown | MD | 21522 | 2022 | 350 |

    I used Simple Query Wizard where I chose Patient Table and the following fields; Patient number, last name, and first name. The criteria were First Visit = 2019. The following results were obtained when the query was run:

    Patient # 54783: Williams, Jack

    Patient # 64589: Metheny, Alexa

    Patient # 95874: Van Wegan, Alison

    These three patients are the only records that match the first year of visit in 2019.

    These results can help the management to analyze the trends of patients in the form of the number of visits per year to aid in resource allocation and strategy planning. In the case of the first visit, the pattern can be seen to predict the future demand of the target group, staffing optimization, and better preventive care programs. As mentioned, the descriptive analytics of historical patient data assists the health care provider to determine the trends in admissions and outcomes, thereby making health care decisions (Turner, 2024). This promotes proactive management which may help save on costs and improve patient engagement by conducting targeted follow-ups.

    **Query 2: Patients Owing More Than $300**

    | | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **Patient #** | **Last Name** | **First Name** | **Address** | **State** | **Zip Code** | **Balance** |
    | 95874 | Van Wegan | Alison | 100 Quantico | MD | 21204 | 350 |
    | 23895 | Jackson | Ryan | 2320 Hills Circle | VA | 20147 | 325 |
    | 54123 | Ken | Ken | 123 Main St | VA | 22191 | 315 |
    | 76213 | McBurney | Colton | 45 Trotters Drive Hagerstown | MD | 21522 | 350 |

    To answer this query, I selected Patient #, Last Name, First Name, Address, State, Zip Code, and Balance as the table entries that I wished to select in the Simple Query Wizard using the Patient Table. The criteria were Balance > 300. Running the query produced:

    Patient # 95874: Van Wegan, Alison, 100 Quantico, MD, 21204, $ 350

    Patient # 23895 Jackson, Ryan, 2320 Hills Circle, VA, 20147 $325

    Patient # 54123: Ken, Ken, 123 Main St, VA, 22191, $315

    Patient # 76213: McBurney, Colton 45 Trotters Drive Hagerstown, MD 21522 350

    The following records are used to produce billing statements of the pending balances that are more than 300.

    These results can be used in the management of the revenue cycle by non-clinical management groups, including billing and administrative staffs who can focus on collections, the trend of payments, and minimizing accounts receivable. The information provided in claims such as this allows cost analysis and utilization research and demonstrates the payment patterns that may be used to enhance financial stability and make decisions on service pricing or patient assistance programs (CIVHC, 2025). This increases efficiency during the operation without necessarily engaging the clinical staff, and reimbursements are made on time and financial losses minimized.

    **Reflection on the Process**

    To create the database was not difficult, and after having a blank database as a starting point, the Patient Table would be created using the Design View where the primary key is known as patient number and the properties such as State in uppercase format with the default being IL would be applied. Datasheet View was efficient in data entry during the first seven records and column widths were altered to ease reading. Form Wizard generated a columnar Patient Form making it easier to add the two further records (combining address and city into the Address field where the table did not have a separate City column). The Report Wizard gave a Patient Report (in landscape format, in a collection of steps) by First Visit, slightly Design View manipulated to tweak column widths.

    Difficulties were related to the data consistency like in the case of inconsistency between the Address field in the table and the distinct city in the supplementary records, which needed to be concatenated manually. Another problem was that Short Text data type of First Visit (a year) was working, but had restricted advanced date functions. Some of the pitfalls that may arise when using clinics are problems in data entry causing inaccurate queries, problems of scalability with MS Access when dealing with the increasing number of patients, and security issues when not password secured, which may lead to the violation of HIPAA through the unauthorized access of the data.

    In its place, I would prefer to suggest a cloud-based electronic health record (EHR) system such as Epic or Cerner instead of MS Access. It has superior integration, real-time work, superior analytics, and compliance capabilities, which minimize manual error and scales bigger datasets. MS Access is an adequate product in small scale prototyping but is not robust enough in long term clinical use where other products offer better data integrity and interoperability.

    References

    CIVHC. (2025, August 13).
    _What to expect with claims data_. CIVHC.org.
    [https://civhc.org/2025/08/13/what-to-expect-with-claims-data](https://civhc.org/2025/08/13/what-to-expect-with-claims-data)

    Turner, C. (2024, October 16).
    _Data analytics in healthcare: Transforming patient care delivery_. Park University.
    [https://www.park.edu/blog/data-analytics-in-healthcare-transforming-patient-care-delivery](https://www.park.edu/blog/data-analytics-in-healthcare-transforming-patient-care-delivery)

    **ASSIGNMENT5DUEFEB9.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/assignment5duefeb9-docx-10500675)

    **ASSIGNMENT5DUEFEB9.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/assignment5duefeb9-docx-10500675)

    **## ASSIGNMENT5COMPLETEWORD.docx**

    2

    **Consideration of MS Access Database Development on Healthcare.**

    Name

    Instructor

    School

    Date

    **Consideration of MS Access Database Development on Healthcare.**

    **Introduction**

    The task entailed developing a Microsoft access database of a small healthcare facility, which has just abandoned the use of paper-based records and has introduced the use of a digital system. The database consisted of a Patient Table which had defined fields, inputting of data in Datasheet View, a form creation of the additional records, a grouped report and two queries. I used my last name as the file name which was named as ken.accdb. This was done to simulate a real-world database development within the healthcare sector with a focus on data organization, retrieval, and analysis. The queries, their results, and managerial applications are enumerated below after which I provide a reflection on the process.

    **Query 1: Patients Who Visited last year (2019).**

    | | | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **Patient #** | **Last Name** | **First Name** | **Address** | **State** | **Zip Code** | **First Visit** | **Balance** |
    | 54783 | Williams | Jack | 62 Smith Lane | MD | 21202 | 2019 | 250 |
    | 64589 | Metheny | Alexa | 125 Fairview | MD | 21203 | 2019 | 200 |
    | 95874 | Van Wegan | Alison | 100 Quantico | MD | 21204 | 2019 | 350 |
    | 23895 | Jackson | Ryan | 2320 Hills Circle | VA | 20147 | 2020 | 325 |
    | 96312 | Berstein | Krista | 126 South Street | VA | 20148 | 2020 | 290 |
    | 54387 | Wylliams | Karen | 43 Jones Ave. | VA | 22193 | 2021 | 200 |
    | 54123 | Ken | Ken | 123 Main St | VA | 22191 | 2021 | 315 |
    | 36987 | Booy | Aaron | 21 Fairview Lane Ashburn | VA | 20146 | 2020 | 250 |
    | 76213 | McBurney | Colton | 45 Trotters Drive Hagerstown | MD | 21522 | 2022 | 350 |

    I used Simple Query Wizard where I chose Patient Table and the following fields; Patient number, last name, and first name. The criteria were First Visit = 2019. The following results were obtained when the query was run:

    Patient # 54783: Williams, Jack

    Patient # 64589: Metheny, Alexa

    Patient # 95874: Van Wegan, Alison

    These three patients are the only records that match the first year of visit in 2019.

    These results can help the management to analyze the trends of patients in the form of the number of visits per year to aid in resource allocation and strategy planning. In the case of the first visit, the pattern can be seen to predict the future demand of the target group, staffing optimization, and better preventive care programs. As mentioned, the descriptive analytics of historical patient data assists the health care provider to determine the trends in admissions and outcomes, thereby making health care decisions (Turner, 2024). This promotes proactive management which may help save on costs and improve patient engagement by conducting targeted follow-ups.

    **Query 2: Patients Owing More Than $300**

    | | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **Patient #** | **Last Name** | **First Name** | **Address** | **State** | **Zip Code** | **Balance** |
    | 95874 | Van Wegan | Alison | 100 Quantico | MD | 21204 | 350 |
    | 23895 | Jackson | Ryan | 2320 Hills Circle | VA | 20147 | 325 |
    | 54123 | Ken | Ken | 123 Main St | VA | 22191 | 315 |
    | 76213 | McBurney | Colton | 45 Trotters Drive Hagerstown | MD | 21522 | 350 |

    To answer this query, I selected Patient #, Last Name, First Name, Address, State, Zip Code, and Balance as the table entries that I wished to select in the Simple Query Wizard using the Patient Table. The criteria were Balance > 300. Running the query produced:

    Patient # 95874: Van Wegan, Alison, 100 Quantico, MD, 21204, $ 350

    Patient # 23895 Jackson, Ryan, 2320 Hills Circle, VA, 20147 $325

    Patient # 54123: Ken, Ken, 123 Main St, VA, 22191, $315

    Patient # 76213: McBurney, Colton 45 Trotters Drive Hagerstown, MD 21522 350

    The following records are used to produce billing statements of the pending balances that are more than 300.

    These results can be used in the management of the revenue cycle by non-clinical management groups, including billing and administrative staffs who can focus on collections, the trend of payments, and minimizing accounts receivable. The information provided in claims such as this allows cost analysis and utilization research and demonstrates the payment patterns that may be used to enhance financial stability and make decisions on service pricing or patient assistance programs (CIVHC, 2025). This increases efficiency during the operation without necessarily engaging the clinical staff, and reimbursements are made on time and financial losses minimized.

    **Reflection on the Process**

    To create the database was not difficult, and after having a blank database as a starting point, the Patient Table would be created using the Design View where the primary key is known as patient number and the properties such as State in uppercase format with the default being IL would be applied. Datasheet View was efficient in data entry during the first seven records and column widths were altered to ease reading. Form Wizard generated a columnar Patient Form making it easier to add the two further records (combining address and city into the Address field where the table did not have a separate City column). The Report Wizard gave a Patient Report (in landscape format, in a collection of steps) by First Visit, slightly Design View manipulated to tweak column widths.

    Difficulties were related to the data consistency like in the case of inconsistency between the Address field in the table and the distinct city in the supplementary records, which needed to be concatenated manually. Another problem was that Short Text data type of First Visit (a year) was working, but had restricted advanced date functions. Some of the pitfalls that may arise when using clinics are problems in data entry causing inaccurate queries, problems of scalability with MS Access when dealing with the increasing number of patients, and security issues when not password secured, which may lead to the violation of HIPAA through the unauthorized access of the data.

    In its place, I would prefer to suggest a cloud-based electronic health record (EHR) system such as Epic or Cerner instead of MS Access. It has superior integration, real-time work, superior analytics, and compliance capabilities, which minimize manual error and scales bigger datasets. MS Access is an adequate product in small scale prototyping but is not robust enough in long term clinical use where other products offer better data integrity and interoperability.

    References

    CIVHC. (2025, August 13).
    _What to expect with claims data_. CIVHC.org.
    [https://civhc.org/2025/08/13/what-to-expect-with-claims-data](https://civhc.org/2025/08/13/what-to-expect-with-claims-data)

    Turner, C. (2024, October 16).
    _Data analytics in healthcare: Transforming patient care delivery_. Park University.
    [https://www.park.edu/blog/data-analytics-in-healthcare-transforming-patient-care-delivery](https://www.park.edu/blog/data-analytics-in-healthcare-transforming-patient-care-delivery)

    **ASSIGNMENT5DUEFEB9.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/assignment5duefeb9-docx-10500675)

    **## ASSIGNMENT5COMPLETEWORD.docx**

    2

    **Consideration of MS Access Database Development on Healthcare.**

    Name

    Instructor

    School

    Date

    **Consideration of MS Access Database Development on Healthcare.**

    **Introduction**

    The task entailed developing a Microsoft access database of a small healthcare facility, which has just abandoned the use of paper-based records and has introduced the use of a digital system. The database consisted of a Patient Table which had defined fields, inputting of data in Datasheet View, a form creation of the additional records, a grouped report and two queries. I used my last name as the file name which was named as ken.accdb. This was done to simulate a real-world database development within the healthcare sector with a focus on data organization, retrieval, and analysis. The queries, their results, and managerial applications are enumerated below after which I provide a reflection on the process.

    **Query 1: Patients Who Visited last year (2019).**

    | | | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **Patient #** | **Last Name** | **First Name** | **Address** | **State** | **Zip Code** | **First Visit** | **Balance** |
    | 54783 | Williams | Jack | 62 Smith Lane | MD | 21202 | 2019 | 250 |
    | 64589 | Metheny | Alexa | 125 Fairview | MD | 21203 | 2019 | 200 |
    | 95874 | Van Wegan | Alison | 100 Quantico | MD | 21204 | 2019 | 350 |
    | 23895 | Jackson | Ryan | 2320 Hills Circle | VA | 20147 | 2020 | 325 |
    | 96312 | Berstein | Krista | 126 South Street | VA | 20148 | 2020 | 290 |
    | 54387 | Wylliams | Karen | 43 Jones Ave. | VA | 22193 | 2021 | 200 |
    | 54123 | Ken | Ken | 123 Main St | VA | 22191 | 2021 | 315 |
    | 36987 | Booy | Aaron | 21 Fairview Lane Ashburn | VA | 20146 | 2020 | 250 |
    | 76213 | McBurney | Colton | 45 Trotters Drive Hagerstown | MD | 21522 | 2022 | 350 |

    I used Simple Query Wizard where I chose Patient Table and the following fields; Patient number, last name, and first name. The criteria were First Visit = 2019. The following results were obtained when the query was run:

    Patient # 54783: Williams, Jack

    Patient # 64589: Metheny, Alexa

    Patient # 95874: Van Wegan, Alison

    These three patients are the only records that match the first year of visit in 2019.

    These results can help the management to analyze the trends of patients in the form of the number of visits per year to aid in resource allocation and strategy planning. In the case of the first visit, the pattern can be seen to predict the future demand of the target group, staffing optimization, and better preventive care programs. As mentioned, the descriptive analytics of historical patient data assists the health care provider to determine the trends in admissions and outcomes, thereby making health care decisions (Turner, 2024). This promotes proactive management which may help save on costs and improve patient engagement by conducting targeted follow-ups.

    **Query 2: Patients Owing More Than $300**

    | | | | | | | |
    | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
    | **Patient #** | **Last Name** | **First Name** | **Address** | **State** | **Zip Code** | **Balance** |
    | 95874 | Van Wegan | Alison | 100 Quantico | MD | 21204 | 350 |
    | 23895 | Jackson | Ryan | 2320 Hills Circle | VA | 20147 | 325 |
    | 54123 | Ken | Ken | 123 Main St | VA | 22191 | 315 |
    | 76213 | McBurney | Colton | 45 Trotters Drive Hagerstown | MD | 21522 | 350 |

    To answer this query, I selected Patient #, Last Name, First Name, Address, State, Zip Code, and Balance as the table entries that I wished to select in the Simple Query Wizard using the Patient Table. The criteria were Balance > 300. Running the query produced:

    Patient # 95874: Van Wegan, Alison, 100 Quantico, MD, 21204, $ 350

    Patient # 23895 Jackson, Ryan, 2320 Hills Circle, VA, 20147 $325

    Patient # 54123: Ken, Ken, 123 Main St, VA, 22191, $315

    Patient # 76213: McBurney, Colton 45 Trotters Drive Hagerstown, MD 21522 350

    The following records are used to produce billing statements of the pending balances that are more than 300.

    These results can be used in the management of the revenue cycle by non-clinical management groups, including billing and administrative staffs who can focus on collections, the trend of payments, and minimizing accounts receivable. The information provided in claims such as this allows cost analysis and utilization research and demonstrates the payment patterns that may be used to enhance financial stability and make decisions on service pricing or patient assistance programs (CIVHC, 2025). This increases efficiency during the operation without necessarily engaging the clinical staff, and reimbursements are made on time and financial losses minimized.

    **Reflection on the Process**

    To create the database was not difficult, and after having a blank database as a starting point, the Patient Table would be created using the Design View where the primary key is known as patient number and the properties such as State in uppercase format with the default being IL would be applied. Datasheet View was efficient in data entry during the first seven records and column widths were altered to ease reading. Form Wizard generated a columnar Patient Form making it easier to add the two further records (combining address and city into the Address field where the table did not have a separate City column). The Report Wizard gave a Patient Report (in landscape format, in a collection of steps) by First Visit, slightly Design View manipulated to tweak column widths.

    Difficulties were related to the data consistency like in the case of inconsistency between the Address field in the table and the distinct city in the supplementary records, which needed to be concatenated manually. Another problem was that Short Text data type of First Visit (a year) was working, but had restricted advanced date functions. Some of the pitfalls that may arise when using clinics are problems in data entry causing inaccurate queries, problems of scalability with MS Access when dealing with the increasing number of patients, and security issues when not password secured, which may lead to the violation of HIPAA through the unauthorized access of the data.

    In its place, I would prefer to suggest a cloud-based electronic health record (EHR) system such as Epic or Cerner instead of MS Access. It has superior integration, real-time work, superior analytics, and compliance capabilities, which minimize manual error and scales bigger datasets. MS Access is an adequate product in small scale prototyping but is not robust enough in long term clinical use where other products offer better data integrity and interoperability.

    References

    CIVHC. (2025, August 13).
    _What to expect with claims data_. CIVHC.org.
    [https://civhc.org/2025/08/13/what-to-expect-with-claims-data](https://civhc.org/2025/08/13/what-to-expect-with-claims-data)

    Turner, C. (2024, October 16).
    _Data analytics in healthcare: Transforming patient care delivery_. Park University.
    [https://www.park.edu/blog/data-analytics-in-healthcare-transforming-patient-care-delivery](https://www.park.edu/blog/data-analytics-in-healthcare-transforming-patient-care-delivery)

    **ASSIGNMENT5DUEFEB9.docx**

    This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/assignment5duefeb9-docx-10500675)

  • [Solved] i need help

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering i need help.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.