Tag: Model Answer

  • [Solved] Blockchain Presentation

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    presentation about a blockchain **files (1)** – ## Presentationfile.docx **## Presentationfile.docx** Term Project CIS 5730- Blockchain Application Project Guideline Part ii–Presentation Along with the project you will present what you did to the class in a short presentation. If you want, you can …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    presentation about a blockchain

    **files (1)**

    – ## Presentationfile.docx

    **## Presentationfile.docx**

    Term Project CIS 5730- Blockchain Application

    Project Guideline

    Part ii–Presentation Along with the project you will present what you did to the class in a short presentation. If you want, you can demonstrate the project, or just present an overview of what you did. Presentations should be about 15-20 minutes. Part of your project grade will include the effectiveness of the presentation.

    Please find your topic for your project and do around 10 slides for it

    (1) what products/platform/blockchain languages you will work on

    (2) How this products/Dapp works for ? who is your DApp users

    (3) Dataset you need to develop DApp

    (4) how your hands-on lab design –at least 4 tasks

    Purpose Free Solution

    Smart contract development & deployment (test) Remix, Hardhat, Truffle

    Connecting to blockchain MetaMask, Infura

    Frontend hosting Fleek, Replit, 4EVERLAND

    Full-stack free prototyping Replit Blockchain Builder

    My Thoughts:

    Project Brief: Secure-Trade

    A Decentralized Multi-Sig Escrow System

    1. Executive Summary

    Secure-Trade is a full-stack Decentralized Application (DApp) designed to eliminate fraud in high-value transactions, such as luxury fashion resale and real estate. The system replaces traditional, expensive escrow services with a 2-out-of-3 Multi-Signature Smart Contract. Funds are only released when a combination of the Buyer, Seller, or a neutral Arbiter (Legal Node) provides digital signatures.

    2. Technology Stack

    To ensure the project is industry-standard the following tools will be used:

    · Smart Contract Language: Solidity ^0.8.0 (targeting the Ethereum Virtual Machine).

    · Blockchain Libraries: Ethers.js (to bridge the frontend and the blockchain).

    · Development Environment: Remix IDE for rapid testing and Hardhat for deployment/debugging.

    · Wallet Integration: MetaMask (for user authentication and transaction signing).

    · Hosting: Fleek or 4EVERLAND (to host the frontend on IPFS).

    3. User Personas & Logic

    The DApp functions as a "Trustless Vault" with three key roles:

    1. The Buyer: Deposits the purchase price into the contract.

    2. The Seller: Receives funds only after verification.

    3. The Arbiter (The "Third Key"): A verified expert (Lawyer or Authenticator) who confirms the "Real World" condition (e.g., house title signed or luxury bag verified) to trigger the release or refund.

    4. Dataset Strategy

    The project will be grounded in real-world data to simulate a live environment:

    · Asset Data: Kaggle "Real Estate Property Transactions" (Florida/Arizona). This provides realistic property IDs, prices, and locations.

    · Transaction Logic: Modeled after Gnosis Safe multi-sig logs and Propy on-chain deed transactions.

    —

    5. Hands-On Lab Design (The Demo)

    The project will be demonstrated through 4 specific technical tasks:

    · Task 1: Deployment: Deploying the contract and initializing the three wallet addresses.

    · Task 2: The Lock-In: The Buyer account sends Test ETH to the contract.

    · Task 3: Legal/Expert Verification: The Arbiter account reviews the asset metadata and "approves" the transaction on-chain.

    · Task 4: Automated Settlement: Executing the transfer once the 2-signature threshold is met and verifying the transaction on a block explorer (Etherscan).

    **Presentation Slides**

    I WOULD LIKE TO DEMO BOTH THE REAL ESTATE AND LUXURY SIDE.

    To position Secure-Trade as a universal solution for "High-Value Trust."

    Presentation Outline: Secure-Trade

    **Slide 1: Title & Vision**

    · Project Name: Secure-Trade

    · Tagline: A Universal Multi-Signature Protocol for High-Value Trust.

    · Presented by: Kayla Beasley

    · Core Concept: Bridging the "Trust Gap" in Luxury Resale and Real Estate through 2-out-of-3 Arbiter Logic.

    **Slide 2: The Problem (Industry Fragmentation)**

    · Luxury: Counterfeit "Super-Fakes" and lack of provenance.

    · Real Estate: High wire-fraud risks and manual, 30-day escrow delays.

    · Commonality: Both rely on expensive, fallible human middlemen.

    **Slide 3: (1) Technology Stack**

    · Languages: Solidity ^0.8.0 (Smart Contracts) & JavaScript (Frontend).

    · Libraries: Ethers.js (Blockchain Bridge).

    · Tools: Remix IDE, Hardhat, MetaMask, and Infura.

    · Deployment: IPFS hosting via Fleek/4EVERLAND for a decentralized UI.

    **Slide 4: (2) How Secure-Trade Works**

    · The "Digital Vault": Funds are locked in a contract, not a bank.

    · The 2-out-of-3 Rule: Release requires 2 signatures.

    o Scenario A: Buyer + Seller (Smooth transaction).

    o Scenario B: Buyer + Arbiter (Refund on a fake/bad title).

    o Scenario C: Seller + Arbiter (Payout when a buyer is unresponsive).

    **Slide 5: User Personas (Dual Industry)**

    · The Buyer: Luxury collector or Homebuyer (Florida/Arizona).

    · The Seller: Luxury brand/reseller or Property Owner.

    · The Arbiter:

    o Fashion: Professional Authenticator.

    o Legal: Real Estate Attorney / Title Agent.

    **Slide 6: (3) Dataset Strategy**

    · Primary Source: Kaggle Real Estate Dataset (Transaction IDs, Locations, Sale Prices).

    · Secondary Source: Synthetic Luxury Metadata (Serial numbers, Brand IDs).

    · On-Chain Reference: Gnosis Safe and Propy transaction logs to model security patterns.

    **Slide 7: (4) Hands-on Lab: Task 1 & 2**

    · Task 1 (Deployment): Deploy the SecureTrade.sol contract and define the Arbiter (Lawyer/Authenticator) address.

    · Task 2 (Deposit): The Buyer locks 0.1 Test ETH.

    o Visual: Show the "Contract Balance" increasing while the funds are "Pending."

    **Slide 8: (4) Hands-on Lab: Task 3 & 4**

    · Task 3 (Verification): The Arbiter reviews the Kaggle Property ID or Luxury Certificate and signs the "Approved" function.

    · Task 4 (Settlement): The payout executes.

    o Visual: Screenshot of the successful balance transfer on Etherscan.

    **Slide 9: Related Work & Scholarly Context**

    · Ricardian Logic: Linking legal intent to code (Grigg, 2004).

    · Industry Standards: Following the Aura Blockchain Consortium (Fashion) and Propy (Real Estate) models.

    · Recent Research: Title automation and counterfeit prevention (Yang et al., 2025).

    **Slide 10: Conclusion & Roadmap**

    · Summary: Secure-Trade is a portable protocol for any high-value asset.

    · Future Scope: Integrating Chainlink Oracles to automatically verify real-world data without a human arbiter.

    **## Presentationfile.docx**

    Term Project CIS 5730- Blockchain Application

    Project Guideline

    Part ii–Presentation Along with the project you will present what you did to the class in a short presentation. If you want, you can demonstrate the project, or just present an overview of what you did. Presentations should be about 15-20 minutes. Part of your project grade will include the effectiveness of the presentation.

    Please find your topic for your project and do around 10 slides for it

    (1) what products/platform/blockchain languages you will work on

    (2) How this products/Dapp works for ? who is your DApp users

    (3) Dataset you need to develop DApp

    (4) how your hands-on lab design –at least 4 tasks

    Purpose Free Solution

    Smart contract development & deployment (test) Remix, Hardhat, Truffle

    Connecting to blockchain MetaMask, Infura

    Frontend hosting Fleek, Replit, 4EVERLAND

    Full-stack free prototyping Replit Blockchain Builder

    My Thoughts:

    Project Brief: Secure-Trade

    A Decentralized Multi-Sig Escrow System

    1. Executive Summary

    Secure-Trade is a full-stack Decentralized Application (DApp) designed to eliminate fraud in high-value transactions, such as luxury fashion resale and real estate. The system replaces traditional, expensive escrow services with a 2-out-of-3 Multi-Signature Smart Contract. Funds are only released when a combination of the Buyer, Seller, or a neutral Arbiter (Legal Node) provides digital signatures.

    2. Technology Stack

    To ensure the project is industry-standard the following tools will be used:

    · Smart Contract Language: Solidity ^0.8.0 (targeting the Ethereum Virtual Machine).

    · Blockchain Libraries: Ethers.js (to bridge the frontend and the blockchain).

    · Development Environment: Remix IDE for rapid testing and Hardhat for deployment/debugging.

    · Wallet Integration: MetaMask (for user authentication and transaction signing).

    · Hosting: Fleek or 4EVERLAND (to host the frontend on IPFS).

    3. User Personas & Logic

    The DApp functions as a "Trustless Vault" with three key roles:

    1. The Buyer: Deposits the purchase price into the contract.

    2. The Seller: Receives funds only after verification.

    3. The Arbiter (The "Third Key"): A verified expert (Lawyer or Authenticator) who confirms the "Real World" condition (e.g., house title signed or luxury bag verified) to trigger the release or refund.

    4. Dataset Strategy

    The project will be grounded in real-world data to simulate a live environment:

    · Asset Data: Kaggle "Real Estate Property Transactions" (Florida/Arizona). This provides realistic property IDs, prices, and locations.

    · Transaction Logic: Modeled after Gnosis Safe multi-sig logs and Propy on-chain deed transactions.

    —

    5. Hands-On Lab Design (The Demo)

    The project will be demonstrated through 4 specific technical tasks:

    · Task 1: Deployment: Deploying the contract and initializing the three wallet addresses.

    · Task 2: The Lock-In: The Buyer account sends Test ETH to the contract.

    · Task 3: Legal/Expert Verification: The Arbiter account reviews the asset metadata and "approves" the transaction on-chain.

    · Task 4: Automated Settlement: Executing the transfer once the 2-signature threshold is met and verifying the transaction on a block explorer (Etherscan).

    **Presentation Slides**

    I WOULD LIKE TO DEMO BOTH THE REAL ESTATE AND LUXURY SIDE.

    To position Secure-Trade as a universal solution for "High-Value Trust."

    Presentation Outline: Secure-Trade

    **Slide 1: Title & Vision**

    · Project Name: Secure-Trade

    · Tagline: A Universal Multi-Signature Protocol for High-Value Trust.

    · Presented by: Kayla Beasley

    · Core Concept: Bridging the "Trust Gap" in Luxury Resale and Real Estate through 2-out-of-3 Arbiter Logic.

    **Slide 2: The Problem (Industry Fragmentation)**

    · Luxury: Counterfeit "Super-Fakes" and lack of provenance.

    · Real Estate: High wire-fraud risks and manual, 30-day escrow delays.

    · Commonality: Both rely on expensive, fallible human middlemen.

    **Slide 3: (1) Technology Stack**

    · Languages: Solidity ^0.8.0 (Smart Contracts) & JavaScript (Frontend).

    · Libraries: Ethers.js (Blockchain Bridge).

    · Tools: Remix IDE, Hardhat, MetaMask, and Infura.

    · Deployment: IPFS hosting via Fleek/4EVERLAND for a decentralized UI.

    **Slide 4: (2) How Secure-Trade Works**

    · The "Digital Vault": Funds are locked in a contract, not a bank.

    · The 2-out-of-3 Rule: Release requires 2 signatures.

    o Scenario A: Buyer + Seller (Smooth transaction).

    o Scenario B: Buyer + Arbiter (Refund on a fake/bad title).

    o Scenario C: Seller + Arbiter (Payout when a buyer is unresponsive).

    **Slide 5: User Personas (Dual Industry)**

    · The Buyer: Luxury collector or Homebuyer (Florida/Arizona).

    · The Seller: Luxury brand/reseller or Property Owner.

    · The Arbiter:

    o Fashion: Professional Authenticator.

    o Legal: Real Estate Attorney / Title Agent.

    **Slide 6: (3) Dataset Strategy**

    · Primary Source: Kaggle Real Estate Dataset (Transaction IDs, Locations, Sale Prices).

    · Secondary Source: Synthetic Luxury Metadata (Serial numbers, Brand IDs).

    · On-Chain Reference: Gnosis Safe and Propy transaction logs to model security patterns.

    **Slide 7: (4) Hands-on Lab: Task 1 & 2**

    · Task 1 (Deployment): Deploy the SecureTrade.sol contract and define the Arbiter (Lawyer/Authenticator) address.

    · Task 2 (Deposit): The Buyer locks 0.1 Test ETH.

    o Visual: Show the "Contract Balance" increasing while the funds are "Pending."

    **Slide 8: (4) Hands-on Lab: Task 3 & 4**

    · Task 3 (Verification): The Arbiter reviews the Kaggle Property ID or Luxury Certificate and signs the "Approved" function.

    · Task 4 (Settlement): The payout executes.

    o Visual: Screenshot of the successful balance transfer on Etherscan.

    **Slide 9: Related Work & Scholarly Context**

    · Ricardian Logic: Linking legal intent to code (Grigg, 2004).

    · Industry Standards: Following the Aura Blockchain Consortium (Fashion) and Propy (Real Estate) models.

    · Recent Research: Title automation and counterfeit prevention (Yang et al., 2025).

    **Slide 10: Conclusion & Roadmap**

    · Summary: Secure-Trade is a portable protocol for any high-value asset.

    · Future Scope: Integrating Chainlink Oracles to automatically verify real-world data without a human arbiter.

  • [Solved] assitant needed kk-h

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    please see attachment **files (1)** – ## Videodocumentary.docx **## Videodocumentary.docx** Video/documentary 1: James Baldwin, I’m not your Negro: Analyze the contents of each video and state how it relates to the African American experiences. **## Videodocumentary.docx** Video/documentary 1: James…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    please see attachment

    **files (1)**

    – ## Videodocumentary.docx

    **## Videodocumentary.docx**

    Video/documentary 1: James Baldwin, I’m not your Negro: Analyze the contents of each video and state how it relates to the African American experiences.

    **## Videodocumentary.docx**

    Video/documentary 1: James Baldwin, I’m not your Negro: Analyze the contents of each video and state how it relates to the African American experiences.

  • [Solved] question

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (1)** – ## lassignment.docx **## lassignment.docx** Reassessment of Strengths and Opportunities [There is a saying that “people must look back in order to look forward.” As you transition out of this practicum, finish your program, and look forward to your career beyond the program, you must…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (1)**

    – ## lassignment.docx

    **## lassignment.docx**

    Reassessment of Strengths and Opportunities

    [There is a saying that “people must look back in order to look forward.” As you transition out of this practicum, finish your program, and look forward to your career beyond the program, you must “look back” at all that you have accomplished, taking stock of your skill and confidence levels before moving on.\
    \
    For this Assignment, you return to your Week 1 Self-Assessment to gain a new perspective on what you need to do moving forward.\
    \
    Resources\
    \
    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.\
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Adobe/OrigImage-LgRendition/AdobeStock_97870934.jpeg)

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/196538/modules/items/8325585)

    **To prepare:**

    · Review your completed Clinical Skills and Procedures Self-Assessment Form from Week 1, as well as the record of procedures you have performed throughout the practicum.

    **Assignment (1 page)**

    · Perform a new self-assessment. Rate yourself on clinical skills, based on your experiences during this practicum. Summarize the results.

    · Explain which goals you accomplished and which you did not. If you did not achieve a particular goal, explain how you could continue to work on it after you complete your program, as you advance and grow in your career.

    By Day 7

    Submit your completed Assignment.

    submission information

    Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the
    **Turnitin Drafts** from the
    **Start Here** area.

    1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as
    **WK11Assgn+last name+first initial.**

    2. Then, click on
    **Start Assignment** near the top of the page.

    3. Next, click on
    **Upload File** and select
    **Submit Assignment** for review.

    Rubric

    **PRAC_6568_Week11_Assignment_Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | PRAC_6568_Week11_Assignment_Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePerform a new self-assessment, rating yourself on clinical skills based on your experiences during this practicum. Summarize the results. | **45 to >40.0 ptsExcellent** The response provides an accurate, clear, and complete summary.<br> <br>**40 to >35.5 ptsGood** The response provides an accurate summary.<br> <br>**35.5 to >31.0 ptsFair** The response provides a somewhat vague, inaccurate, or incomplete summary.<br> <br>**31 to >0 ptsPoor** The response provides a vague, inaccurate, or incomplete summary, or the summary is missing. | 45 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain which goals you accomplished and which you did not. If you did not achieve a particular goal, explain how you could continue to work on it after you complete your program, as you advance and grow in your career. | **40 to >35.0 ptsExcellent** The response accurately and thoroughly explains in detail which goals were accomplished and which were not. Full explanation is provided for how to continue working on goals.<br> <br>**35 to >31.0 ptsGood** The response accurately explains which goals were accomplished and which were not. Explanation is provided for how to continue working on goals.<br> <br>**31 to >27.0 ptsFair** The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately explains which goals were accomplished and which were not. Vague explanation is provided for how to continue working on goals.<br> <br>**27 to >0 ptsPoor** The response vaguely or inaccurately explains which goals were accomplished and which were not, or explanation is missing. Vague explanation is provided for how to continue working on goals, or explanation is missing. | 40 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English writing standards: Student uses correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood** Contains one or two (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct APA format with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood** Contains a one or two (1 or 2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 5 pts |

    **## lassignment.docx**

    Reassessment of Strengths and Opportunities

    [There is a saying that “people must look back in order to look forward.” As you transition out of this practicum, finish your program, and look forward to your career beyond the program, you must “look back” at all that you have accomplished, taking stock of your skill and confidence levels before moving on.\
    \
    For this Assignment, you return to your Week 1 Self-Assessment to gain a new perspective on what you need to do moving forward.\
    \
    Resources\
    \
    Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.\
    Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.](https://cdn-media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Adobe/OrigImage-LgRendition/AdobeStock_97870934.jpeg)

    [**WEEKLY RESOURCES**](https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/196538/modules/items/8325585)

    **To prepare:**

    · Review your completed Clinical Skills and Procedures Self-Assessment Form from Week 1, as well as the record of procedures you have performed throughout the practicum.

    **Assignment (1 page)**

    · Perform a new self-assessment. Rate yourself on clinical skills, based on your experiences during this practicum. Summarize the results.

    · Explain which goals you accomplished and which you did not. If you did not achieve a particular goal, explain how you could continue to work on it after you complete your program, as you advance and grow in your career.

    By Day 7

    Submit your completed Assignment.

    submission information

    Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the
    **Turnitin Drafts** from the
    **Start Here** area.

    1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as
    **WK11Assgn+last name+first initial.**

    2. Then, click on
    **Start Assignment** near the top of the page.

    3. Next, click on
    **Upload File** and select
    **Submit Assignment** for review.

    Rubric

    **PRAC_6568_Week11_Assignment_Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | PRAC_6568_Week11_Assignment_Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePerform a new self-assessment, rating yourself on clinical skills based on your experiences during this practicum. Summarize the results. | **45 to >40.0 ptsExcellent** The response provides an accurate, clear, and complete summary.<br> <br>**40 to >35.5 ptsGood** The response provides an accurate summary.<br> <br>**35.5 to >31.0 ptsFair** The response provides a somewhat vague, inaccurate, or incomplete summary.<br> <br>**31 to >0 ptsPoor** The response provides a vague, inaccurate, or incomplete summary, or the summary is missing. | 45 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain which goals you accomplished and which you did not. If you did not achieve a particular goal, explain how you could continue to work on it after you complete your program, as you advance and grow in your career. | **40 to >35.0 ptsExcellent** The response accurately and thoroughly explains in detail which goals were accomplished and which were not. Full explanation is provided for how to continue working on goals.<br> <br>**35 to >31.0 ptsGood** The response accurately explains which goals were accomplished and which were not. Explanation is provided for how to continue working on goals.<br> <br>**31 to >27.0 ptsFair** The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately explains which goals were accomplished and which were not. Vague explanation is provided for how to continue working on goals.<br> <br>**27 to >0 ptsPoor** The response vaguely or inaccurately explains which goals were accomplished and which were not, or explanation is missing. Vague explanation is provided for how to continue working on goals, or explanation is missing. | 40 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English writing standards: Student uses correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood** Contains one or two (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | **5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent** Uses correct APA format with no errors.<br> <br>**4 to >3.5 ptsGood** Contains a one or two (1 or 2) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair** Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.<br> <br>**3 to >0 ptsPoor** Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. | 5 pts |

  • [Solved] FE2

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (3)** – ## FE2.docx – ## PSELStandards.pdf – ## NELPStandards.pdf **## FE2.docx** **FIELD EXPERIENCE REPORT** **Student’s Name: Date of Completion:** | | | | | — | — | — | | **TITLE OF THE ACTIVITY** | **KNOWLEDGE**<br>(Check one) | **NELP/PSEL STANDARDS ADDRESSED** | | Evaluation Proc…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (3)**

    – ## FE2.docx

    – ## PSELStandards.pdf

    – ## NELPStandards.pdf

    **## FE2.docx**

    **FIELD EXPERIENCE REPORT**

    **Student’s Name: Date of Completion:**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | **TITLE OF THE ACTIVITY** | **KNOWLEDGE**<br>(Check one) | **NELP/PSEL STANDARDS ADDRESSED** |
    | Evaluation Procedures for Non-Certificated Personnel | New _____<br>Changed _______<br>Reinforced __________ | NELP:<br>PSEL: |

    **directions: F** ield Experience: Evaluation Procedures for Non-Certificated Personnel – Review district procedures for evaluating non-certificated personnel and discuss with an administrator how the negotiated contract influences the process. Summarize and reflect on the findings. (Note: Non-certificated are those employees who are considered classified personnel. This group typically includes clerical, instructional assistants, maintenance, etc.)

    **Summary** (provide a clear and concise description of the information you collected and additional details as needed)

    **Reflection**(share your thoughts about the experience and how this information has broadened your understanding of school leadership)

    **## PSELStandards.pdf**

    PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS FOR EDUCATIONAL LEADERS (PSELs)

    For the full standards document visit https://www.wallacefoundation.org/knowledge-
    center/Documents/Professional-Standards-for-Educational-Leaders-2015.pdf

    Standard 1. Mission, Vision, and Core Values

    Effective educational leaders develop, advocate, and enact a shared mission, vision, and core
    values of high-quality education and academic success and well-being of each student.

    Standard 2. Ethics and Professional Norms

    Effective educational leaders act ethically and according to professional norms to promote each
    student’s academic success and well-being.

    Standard 3. Equity and Cultural Responsiveness

    Effective educational leaders strive for equity of educational opportunity and culturally
    responsive practices to promote each student’s academic success and well-being.

    Standard 4. Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment

    Effective educational leaders develop and support intellectually rigorous and coherent systems
    of curriculum, instruction, and assessment promote each student’s academic success and well-

    being.

    Standard 5. Community of Care and Support for Students

    Effective educational leaders cultivate an inclusive, caring, and supportive school community
    that promotes the academic success and well-being of each student.

    Standard 6. Professional Capacity of School Personnel

    Effective educational leaders develop the professional capacity and practice of school
    personnel to promote each student’s academic success and well-being.

    [https://www.wallacefoundation.org/knowledge-center/Documents/Professional-Standards-for-Educational-Leaders-2015.pdf](https://www.wallacefoundation.org/knowledge-center/Documents/Professional-Standards-for-Educational-Leaders-2015.pdf)

    [https://www.wallacefoundation.org/knowledge-center/Documents/Professional-Standards-for-Educational-Leaders-2015.pdf](https://www.wallacefoundation.org/knowledge-center/Documents/Professional-Standards-for-Educational-Leaders-2015.pdf)

    Standard 7. Professional Community for Teachers and Staff

    Effective educational leaders foster a professional community of teachers and other
    professional staff to promote each student’s academic success and well-being.

    Standards 8. Meaningful Engagement of Families and Community

    Effective educational leaders engage families and the community in meaningful, reciprocal, and
    mutually beneficial ways to promote each student’s academic success and well-being.

    Standard 9. Operations and Management

    Effective educational leaders manage school operations and resources to promote each
    student’s academic success and well-being.

    Standard 10. School Improvement

    Effective educational leaders act as agents of continuous improvement to promote each
    student’s academic success and well-being.

    **## NELPStandards.pdf**

    NATIONAL EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP PREPARATION (NELP) PROGRAM
    STANDARDS

    For full text visit http://www.npbea.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/NELP-Building-Standards.pdf

    Standard 1: Mission, Vison, and Improvement

    Candidates who successfully complete a building-level educational leadership preparation program
    understand and demonstrate the capacity to promote the current and future success and well-being of
    each student and adult by applying the knowledge, skills, and commitments necessary to collaboratively
    lead, design, and implement a school mission, vision, and process for continuous improvement that
    reflects a core set of values and priorities that include data use, technology, equity, diversity, digital
    citizenship, and community.

    Component 1.1 Program completers understand and demonstrate the capacity to collaboratively
    evaluate, develop, and communicate a school mission and vision designed to reflect a core set of values
    and priorities that include data use, technology, equity, diversity, digital citizenship, and community.

    Component 1.2 Program completers understand and demonstrate the capacity to lead improvement
    processes that include data use, design, implementation, and evaluation

    Standard 2 Ethics and Professional Norms

    Candidates who successfully complete a building-level educational leadership preparation program
    understand and demonstrate the capacity to promote the current and future success and well-being of
    each student and adult by applying the knowledge, skills, and commitments necessary to understand
    and demonstrate the capacity to advocate for ethical decisions and cultivate and enact professional
    norms.

    Component 2.1 Program completers understand and demonstrate the capacity to reflect on,
    communicate about, cultivate, and model professional dispositions and norms (i.e., fairness, integrity,
    transparency, trust, digital citizenship, collaboration, perseverance, reflection, lifelong learning) that
    support the educational success and well-being of each student and adult.

    Component 2.2 Program completers understand and demonstrate the capacity to evaluate,
    communicate about, and advocate for ethical and legal decisions.

    Component 2.3 Program completers understand and demonstrate the capacity to model ethical
    behavior in their personal conduct and relationships and to cultivate ethical behavior in others.

    [http://www.npbea.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/NELP-Building-Standards.pdf](http://www.npbea.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/NELP-Building-Standards.pdf)

    Standards 3: Equity, Inclusiveness, and Cultural Responsiveness

    Candidates who successfully complete a building-level educational leadership preparation program
    understand and demonstrate the capacity to promote the current and future success and well-being of
    each student and adult by applying the knowledge, skills, and commitments necessary to develop and
    maintain a supportive, equitable, culturally responsive, and inclusive school culture.

    Component 3.1 Program completers understand and demonstrate the capacity to use data to evaluate,
    design, cultivate, and advocate for a supportive and inclusive school culture.

    Component 3.2 Program completers understand and demonstrate the capacity to evaluate, cultivate,
    and advocate for equitable access to educational resources, technologies, and opportunities that
    support the educational success and well-being of each student.

    Component 3.3 Program completers understand and demonstrate the capacity to evaluate, cultivate,
    and advocate for equitable, inclusive, and culturally responsive instruction and behavior support
    practices among teachers and staff.

    Standard 4: Learning and Instruction

    Candidates who successfully complete a building-level educational leadership preparation program
    understand and demonstrate the capacity to promote the current and future success and well-being of
    each student and adult by applying the knowledge, skills, and commitments necessary to evaluate,
    develop, and implement coherent systems of curriculum, instruction, data systems, supports, and
    assessment.

    Component 4.1 Program completers understand and can demonstrate the capacity to evaluate,
    develop, and implement high-quality, technology-rich curricula programs and other supports for
    academic and non-academic student programs.

    Component 4.2 Program completers understand and can demonstrate the capacity to evaluate,
    develop, and implement high-quality and equitable academic and non-academic instructional practices,
    resources, technologies, and services that support equity, digital literacy, and the school’s academic and
    non-academic systems.

    Component 4.3 Program completers understand and can demonstrate the capacity to evaluate,
    develop, and implement formal and informal culturally responsive and accessible assessments that
    support data-informed instructional improvement and student learning and well-being.

    Component 4.4 Program completers understand and demonstrate the capacity to collaboratively
    evaluate, develop, and implement the school’s curriculum, instruction, technology, data systems, and
    assessment practices in a coherent, equitable, and systematic manner

    Standards 5: Community and External Leadership

    Candidates who successfully complete a building-level educational leadership preparation program
    understand and demonstrate the capacity to promote the current and future success and well-being of
    each student and adult by applying the knowledge, skills, and commitments necessary to engage
    families, community, and school personnel in order to strengthen student learning, support school
    improvement, and advocate for the needs of their school and community.

    Component 5.1 Program completers understand and demonstrate the capacity to collaboratively
    engage diverse families in strengthening student learning in and out of school.

    Component 5.2 Program completers understand and demonstrate the capacity to collaboratively
    engage and cultivate relationships with diverse community members, partners, and other constituencies
    for the benefit of school improvement and student development.

    Component 5.3 Program completers understand and demonstrate the capacity to communicate through
    oral, written, and digital means within the larger organizational, community, and political contexts when
    advocating for the needs of their school and community.

    Standard 6: Operations and management

    Candidates who successfully complete a building-level educational leadership preparation program
    understand and demonstrate the capacity to promote the current and future success and well-being of
    each student and adult by applying the knowledge, skills, and commitments necessary to improve
    management, communication, technology, school-level governance, and operation systems to develop
    and improve data-informed and equitable school resource plans and to apply laws, policies, and
    regulations.

    Component 6.1 Program completers understand and demonstrate the capacity to evaluate, develop,
    and implement management, communication, technology, school-level governance, and operation
    systems that support each student’s learning needs and promote the mission and vision of the school.

    Component 6.2 Program completers understand and demonstrate the capacity to evaluate, develop,
    and advocate for a data-informed and equitable resourcing plan that supports school improvement and
    student development.

    Component 6.3 Program completers understand and demonstrate the capacity to reflectively evaluate,
    communicate about, and implement laws, rights, policies, and regulations to promote student and adult
    success and well-being

    Standard 7: Building Professional Capital

    Candidates who successfully complete a building-level educational leadership preparation program
    understand and demonstrate the capacity to promote the current and future success and well-being of
    each student and adult by applying the knowledge, skills, and commitments necessary to build the
    school’s professional capacity, engage staff in the development of a collaborative professional culture,
    and improve systems of staff supervision, evaluation, support, and professional learning.

    Component 7.1 Program completers understand and have the capacity to collaboratively develop the
    school’s professional capacity through engagement in recruiting, selecting, and hiring staff.

    Component 7.2 Program completers understand and have the capacity to develop and engage staff in a
    collaborative professional culture designed to promote school improvement, teacher retention, and the
    success and well-being of each student and adult in the school.

    Component 7.3 Program completers understand and have the capacity to personally engage in, as well
    as collaboratively engage school staff in, professional learning designed to promote reflection, cultural
    responsiveness, distributed leadership, digital literacy, school improvement, and student success.

    Component 7.4 Program completers understand and have the capacity to evaluate, develop, and
    implement systems of supervision, support, and evaluation designed to promote school improvement
    and student success

    Standard 8: Internship

    Candidates successfully complete an internship under the supervision of knowledgeable, expert
    practitioners that engages candidates in multiple and diverse school settings and provides candidates
    with coherent, authentic, and sustained opportunities to synthesize and apply the knowledge and skills
    identified in NELP standards 1–7 in ways that approximate the full range of responsibilities required of
    building-level leaders and enable them to promote the current and future success and well-being of
    each student and adult in their school.

    Component 8.1 Candidates are provided a variety of coherent, authentic field and/or clinical internship
    experiences within multiple school environments that afford opportunities to interact with stakeholders,
    synthesize and apply the content knowledge, and develop and refine the professional skills articulated in
    each of the components included in NELP building-level program standards 1–7.

    Component 8.2 Candidates are provided a minimum of six months of concentrated (10–15 hours per
    week) internship or clinical experiences that include authentic leadership activities within a school
    setting.

    Component 8.3 Candidates are provided a mentor who has demonstrated effectiveness as an
    educational leader within a building setting; is present for a significant portion of the internship; is
    selected collaboratively by the intern, a representative of the school and/or district, and program
    faculty; and has received training from the supervising institution.

    **## NELPStandards.pdf**

    NATIONAL EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP PREPARATION (NELP) PROGRAM
    STANDARDS

    For full text visit http://www.npbea.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/NELP-Building-Standards.pdf

    Standard 1: Mission, Vison, and Improvement

    Candidates who successfully complete a building-level educational leadership preparation program
    understand and demonstrate the capacity to promote the current and future success and well-being of
    each student and adult by applying the knowledge, skills, and commitments necessary to collaboratively
    lead, design, and implement a school mission, vision, and process for continuous improvement that
    reflects a core set of values and priorities that include data use, technology, equity, diversity, digital
    citizenship, and community.

    Component 1.1 Program completers understand and demonstrate the capacity to collaboratively
    evaluate, develop, and communicate a school mission and vision designed to reflect a core set of values
    and priorities that include data use, technology, equity, diversity, digital citizenship, and community.

    Component 1.2 Program completers understand and demonstrate the capacity to lead improvement
    processes that include data use, design, implementation, and evaluation

    Standard 2 Ethics and Professional Norms

    Candidates who successfully complete a building-level educational leadership preparation program
    understand and demonstrate the capacity to promote the current and future success and well-being of
    each student and adult by applying the knowledge, skills, and commitments necessary to understand
    and demonstrate the capacity to advocate for ethical decisions and cultivate and enact professional
    norms.

    Component 2.1 Program completers understand and demonstrate the capacity to reflect on,
    communicate about, cultivate, and model professional dispositions and norms (i.e., fairness, integrity,
    transparency, trust, digital citizenship, collaboration, perseverance, reflection, lifelong learning) that
    support the educational success and well-being of each student and adult.

    Component 2.2 Program completers understand and demonstrate the capacity to evaluate,
    communicate about, and advocate for ethical and legal decisions.

    Component 2.3 Program completers understand and demonstrate the capacity to model ethical
    behavior in their personal conduct and relationships and to cultivate ethical behavior in others.

    [http://www.npbea.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/NELP-Building-Standards.pdf](http://www.npbea.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/NELP-Building-Standards.pdf)

    Standards 3: Equity, Inclusiveness, and Cultural Responsiveness

    Candidates who successfully complete a building-level educational leadership preparation program
    understand and demonstrate the capacity to promote the current and future success and well-being of
    each student and adult by applying the knowledge, skills, and commitments necessary to develop and
    maintain a supportive, equitable, culturally responsive, and inclusive school culture.

    Component 3.1 Program completers understand and demonstrate the capacity to use data to evaluate,
    design, cultivate, and advocate for a supportive and inclusive school culture.

    Component 3.2 Program completers understand and demonstrate the capacity to evaluate, cultivate,
    and advocate for equitable access to educational resources, technologies, and opportunities that
    support the educational success and well-being of each student.

    Component 3.3 Program completers understand and demonstrate the capacity to evaluate, cultivate,
    and advocate for equitable, inclusive, and culturally responsive instruction and behavior support
    practices among teachers and staff.

    Standard 4: Learning and Instruction

    Candidates who successfully complete a building-level educational leadership preparation program
    understand and demonstrate the capacity to promote the current and future success and well-being of
    each student and adult by applying the knowledge, skills, and commitments necessary to evaluate,
    develop, and implement coherent systems of curriculum, instruction, data systems, supports, and
    assessment.

    Component 4.1 Program completers understand and can demonstrate the capacity to evaluate,
    develop, and implement high-quality, technology-rich curricula programs and other supports for
    academic and non-academic student programs.

    Component 4.2 Program completers understand and can demonstrate the capacity to evaluate,
    develop, and implement high-quality and equitable academic and non-academic instructional practices,
    resources, technologies, and services that support equity, digital literacy, and the school’s academic and
    non-academic systems.

    Component 4.3 Program completers understand and can demonstrate the capacity to evaluate,
    develop, and implement formal and informal culturally responsive and accessible assessments that
    support data-informed instructional improvement and student learning and well-being.

    Component 4.4 Program completers understand and demonstrate the capacity to collaboratively
    evaluate, develop, and implement the school’s curriculum, instruction, technology, data systems, and
    assessment practices in a coherent, equitable, and systematic manner

    Standards 5: Community and External Leadership

    Candidates who successfully complete a building-level educational leadership preparation program
    understand and demonstrate the capacity to promote the current and future success and well-being of
    each student and adult by applying the knowledge, skills, and commitments necessary to engage
    families, community, and school personnel in order to strengthen student learning, support school
    improvement, and advocate for the needs of their school and community.

    Component 5.1 Program completers understand and demonstrate the capacity to collaboratively
    engage diverse families in strengthening student learning in and out of school.

    Component 5.2 Program completers understand and demonstrate the capacity to collaboratively
    engage and cultivate relationships with diverse community members, partners, and other constituencies
    for the benefit of school improvement and student development.

    Component 5.3 Program completers understand and demonstrate the capacity to communicate through
    oral, written, and digital means within the larger organizational, community, and political contexts when
    advocating for the needs of their school and community.

    Standard 6: Operations and management

    Candidates who successfully complete a building-level educational leadership preparation program
    understand and demonstrate the capacity to promote the current and future success and well-being of
    each student and adult by applying the knowledge, skills, and commitments necessary to improve
    management, communication, technology, school-level governance, and operation systems to develop
    and improve data-informed and equitable school resource plans and to apply laws, policies, and
    regulations.

    Component 6.1 Program completers understand and demonstrate the capacity to evaluate, develop,
    and implement management, communication, technology, school-level governance, and operation
    systems that support each student’s learning needs and promote the mission and vision of the school.

    Component 6.2 Program completers understand and demonstrate the capacity to evaluate, develop,
    and advocate for a data-informed and equitable resourcing plan that supports school improvement and
    student development.

    Component 6.3 Program completers understand and demonstrate the capacity to reflectively evaluate,
    communicate about, and implement laws, rights, policies, and regulations to promote student and adult
    success and well-being

    Standard 7: Building Professional Capital

    Candidates who successfully complete a building-level educational leadership preparation program
    understand and demonstrate the capacity to promote the current and future success and well-being of
    each student and adult by applying the knowledge, skills, and commitments necessary to build the
    school’s professional capacity, engage staff in the development of a collaborative professional culture,
    and improve systems of staff supervision, evaluation, support, and professional learning.

    Component 7.1 Program completers understand and have the capacity to collaboratively develop the
    school’s professional capacity through engagement in recruiting, selecting, and hiring staff.

    Component 7.2 Program completers understand and have the capacity to develop and engage staff in a
    collaborative professional culture designed to promote school improvement, teacher retention, and the
    success and well-being of each student and adult in the school.

    Component 7.3 Program completers understand and have the capacity to personally engage in, as well
    as collaboratively engage school staff in, professional learning designed to promote reflection, cultural
    responsiveness, distributed leadership, digital literacy, school improvement, and student success.

    Component 7.4 Program completers understand and have the capacity to evaluate, develop, and
    implement systems of supervision, support, and evaluation designed to promote school improvement
    and student success

    Standard 8: Internship

    Candidates successfully complete an internship under the supervision of knowledgeable, expert
    practitioners that engages candidates in multiple and diverse school settings and provides candidates
    with coherent, authentic, and sustained opportunities to synthesize and apply the knowledge and skills
    identified in NELP standards 1–7 in ways that approximate the full range of responsibilities required of
    building-level leaders and enable them to promote the current and future success and well-being of
    each student and adult in their school.

    Component 8.1 Candidates are provided a variety of coherent, authentic field and/or clinical internship
    experiences within multiple school environments that afford opportunities to interact with stakeholders,
    synthesize and apply the content knowledge, and develop and refine the professional skills articulated in
    each of the components included in NELP building-level program standards 1–7.

    Component 8.2 Candidates are provided a minimum of six months of concentrated (10–15 hours per
    week) internship or clinical experiences that include authentic leadership activities within a school
    setting.

    Component 8.3 Candidates are provided a mentor who has demonstrated effectiveness as an
    educational leader within a building setting; is present for a significant portion of the internship; is
    selected collaboratively by the intern, a representative of the school and/or district, and program
    faculty; and has received training from the supervising institution.

    **## FE2.docx**

    **FIELD EXPERIENCE REPORT**

    **Student’s Name: Date of Completion:**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | **TITLE OF THE ACTIVITY** | **KNOWLEDGE**<br>(Check one) | **NELP/PSEL STANDARDS ADDRESSED** |
    | Evaluation Procedures for Non-Certificated Personnel | New _____<br>Changed _______<br>Reinforced __________ | NELP:<br>PSEL: |

    **directions: F** ield Experience: Evaluation Procedures for Non-Certificated Personnel – Review district procedures for evaluating non-certificated personnel and discuss with an administrator how the negotiated contract influences the process. Summarize and reflect on the findings. (Note: Non-certificated are those employees who are considered classified personnel. This group typically includes clerical, instructional assistants, maintenance, etc.)

    **Summary** (provide a clear and concise description of the information you collected and additional details as needed)

    **Reflection**(share your thoughts about the experience and how this information has broadened your understanding of school leadership)

    **## PSELStandards.pdf**

    PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS FOR EDUCATIONAL LEADERS (PSELs)

    For the full standards document visit https://www.wallacefoundation.org/knowledge-
    center/Documents/Professional-Standards-for-Educational-Leaders-2015.pdf

    Standard 1. Mission, Vision, and Core Values

    Effective educational leaders develop, advocate, and enact a shared mission, vision, and core
    values of high-quality education and academic success and well-being of each student.

    Standard 2. Ethics and Professional Norms

    Effective educational leaders act ethically and according to professional norms to promote each
    student’s academic success and well-being.

    Standard 3. Equity and Cultural Responsiveness

    Effective educational leaders strive for equity of educational opportunity and culturally
    responsive practices to promote each student’s academic success and well-being.

    Standard 4. Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment

    Effective educational leaders develop and support intellectually rigorous and coherent systems
    of curriculum, instruction, and assessment promote each student’s academic success and well-

    being.

    Standard 5. Community of Care and Support for Students

    Effective educational leaders cultivate an inclusive, caring, and supportive school community
    that promotes the academic success and well-being of each student.

    Standard 6. Professional Capacity of School Personnel

    Effective educational leaders develop the professional capacity and practice of school
    personnel to promote each student’s academic success and well-being.

    [https://www.wallacefoundation.org/knowledge-center/Documents/Professional-Standards-for-Educational-Leaders-2015.pdf](https://www.wallacefoundation.org/knowledge-center/Documents/Professional-Standards-for-Educational-Leaders-2015.pdf)

    [https://www.wallacefoundation.org/knowledge-center/Documents/Professional-Standards-for-Educational-Leaders-2015.pdf](https://www.wallacefoundation.org/knowledge-center/Documents/Professional-Standards-for-Educational-Leaders-2015.pdf)

    Standard 7. Professional Community for Teachers and Staff

    Effective educational leaders foster a professional community of teachers and other
    professional staff to promote each student’s academic success and well-being.

    Standards 8. Meaningful Engagement of Families and Community

    Effective educational leaders engage families and the community in meaningful, reciprocal, and
    mutually beneficial ways to promote each student’s academic success and well-being.

    Standard 9. Operations and Management

    Effective educational leaders manage school operations and resources to promote each
    student’s academic success and well-being.

    Standard 10. School Improvement

    Effective educational leaders act as agents of continuous improvement to promote each
    student’s academic success and well-being.

    **## NELPStandards.pdf**

    NATIONAL EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP PREPARATION (NELP) PROGRAM
    STANDARDS

    For full text visit http://www.npbea.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/NELP-Building-Standards.pdf

    Standard 1: Mission, Vison, and Improvement

    Candidates who successfully complete a building-level educational leadership preparation program
    understand and demonstrate the capacity to promote the current and future success and well-being of
    each student and adult by applying the knowledge, skills, and commitments necessary to collaboratively
    lead, design, and implement a school mission, vision, and process for continuous improvement that
    reflects a core set of values and priorities that include data use, technology, equity, diversity, digital
    citizenship, and community.

    Component 1.1 Program completers understand and demonstrate the capacity to collaboratively
    evaluate, develop, and communicate a school mission and vision designed to reflect a core set of values
    and priorities that include data use, technology, equity, diversity, digital citizenship, and community.

    Component 1.2 Program completers understand and demonstrate the capacity to lead improvement
    processes that include data use, design, implementation, and evaluation

    Standard 2 Ethics and Professional Norms

    Candidates who successfully complete a building-level educational leadership preparation program
    understand and demonstrate the capacity to promote the current and future success and well-being of
    each student and adult by applying the knowledge, skills, and commitments necessary to understand
    and demonstrate the capacity to advocate for ethical decisions and cultivate and enact professional
    norms.

    Component 2.1 Program completers understand and demonstrate the capacity to reflect on,
    communicate about, cultivate, and model professional dispositions and norms (i.e., fairness, integrity,
    transparency, trust, digital citizenship, collaboration, perseverance, reflection, lifelong learning) that
    support the educational success and well-being of each student and adult.

    Component 2.2 Program completers understand and demonstrate the capacity to evaluate,
    communicate about, and advocate for ethical and legal decisions.

    Component 2.3 Program completers understand and demonstrate the capacity to model ethical
    behavior in their personal conduct and relationships and to cultivate ethical behavior in others.

    [http://www.npbea.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/NELP-Building-Standards.pdf](http://www.npbea.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/NELP-Building-Standards.pdf)

    Standards 3: Equity, Inclusiveness, and Cultural Responsiveness

    Candidates who successfully complete a building-level educational leadership preparation program
    understand and demonstrate the capacity to promote the current and future success and well-being of
    each student and adult by applying the knowledge, skills, and commitments necessary to develop and
    maintain a supportive, equitable, culturally responsive, and inclusive school culture.

    Component 3.1 Program completers understand and demonstrate the capacity to use data to evaluate,
    design, cultivate, and advocate for a supportive and inclusive school culture.

    Component 3.2 Program completers understand and demonstrate the capacity to evaluate, cultivate,
    and advocate for equitable access to educational resources, technologies, and opportunities that
    support the educational success and well-being of each student.

    Component 3.3 Program completers understand and demonstrate the capacity to evaluate, cultivate,
    and advocate for equitable, inclusive, and culturally responsive instruction and behavior support
    practices among teachers and staff.

    Standard 4: Learning and Instruction

    Candidates who successfully complete a building-level educational leadership preparation program
    understand and demonstrate the capacity to promote the current and future success and well-being of
    each student and adult by applying the knowledge, skills, and commitments necessary to evaluate,
    develop, and implement coherent systems of curriculum, instruction, data systems, supports, and
    assessment.

    Component 4.1 Program completers understand and can demonstrate the capacity to evaluate,
    develop, and implement high-quality, technology-rich curricula programs and other supports for
    academic and non-academic student programs.

    Component 4.2 Program completers understand and can demonstrate the capacity to evaluate,
    develop, and implement high-quality and equitable academic and non-academic instructional practices,
    resources, technologies, and services that support equity, digital literacy, and the school’s academic and
    non-academic systems.

    Component 4.3 Program completers understand and can demonstrate the capacity to evaluate,
    develop, and implement formal and informal culturally responsive and accessible assessments that
    support data-informed instructional improvement and student learning and well-being.

    Component 4.4 Program completers understand and demonstrate the capacity to collaboratively
    evaluate, develop, and implement the school’s curriculum, instruction, technology, data systems, and
    assessment practices in a coherent, equitable, and systematic manner

    Standards 5: Community and External Leadership

    Candidates who successfully complete a building-level educational leadership preparation program
    understand and demonstrate the capacity to promote the current and future success and well-being of
    each student and adult by applying the knowledge, skills, and commitments necessary to engage
    families, community, and school personnel in order to strengthen student learning, support school
    improvement, and advocate for the needs of their school and community.

    Component 5.1 Program completers understand and demonstrate the capacity to collaboratively
    engage diverse families in strengthening student learning in and out of school.

    Component 5.2 Program completers understand and demonstrate the capacity to collaboratively
    engage and cultivate relationships with diverse community members, partners, and other constituencies
    for the benefit of school improvement and student development.

    Component 5.3 Program completers understand and demonstrate the capacity to communicate through
    oral, written, and digital means within the larger organizational, community, and political contexts when
    advocating for the needs of their school and community.

    Standard 6: Operations and management

    Candidates who successfully complete a building-level educational leadership preparation program
    understand and demonstrate the capacity to promote the current and future success and well-being of
    each student and adult by applying the knowledge, skills, and commitments necessary to improve
    management, communication, technology, school-level governance, and operation systems to develop
    and improve data-informed and equitable school resource plans and to apply laws, policies, and
    regulations.

    Component 6.1 Program completers understand and demonstrate the capacity to evaluate, develop,
    and implement management, communication, technology, school-level governance, and operation
    systems that support each student’s learning needs and promote the mission and vision of the school.

    Component 6.2 Program completers understand and demonstrate the capacity to evaluate, develop,
    and advocate for a data-informed and equitable resourcing plan that supports school improvement and
    student development.

    Component 6.3 Program completers understand and demonstrate the capacity to reflectively evaluate,
    communicate about, and implement laws, rights, policies, and regulations to promote student and adult
    success and well-being

    Standard 7: Building Professional Capital

    Candidates who successfully complete a building-level educational leadership preparation program
    understand and demonstrate the capacity to promote the current and future success and well-being of
    each student and adult by applying the knowledge, skills, and commitments necessary to build the
    school’s professional capacity, engage staff in the development of a collaborative professional culture,
    and improve systems of staff supervision, evaluation, support, and professional learning.

    Component 7.1 Program completers understand and have the capacity to collaboratively develop the
    school’s professional capacity through engagement in recruiting, selecting, and hiring staff.

    Component 7.2 Program completers understand and have the capacity to develop and engage staff in a
    collaborative professional culture designed to promote school improvement, teacher retention, and the
    success and well-being of each student and adult in the school.

    Component 7.3 Program completers understand and have the capacity to personally engage in, as well
    as collaboratively engage school staff in, professional learning designed to promote reflection, cultural
    responsiveness, distributed leadership, digital literacy, school improvement, and student success.

    Component 7.4 Program completers understand and have the capacity to evaluate, develop, and
    implement systems of supervision, support, and evaluation designed to promote school improvement
    and student success

    Standard 8: Internship

    Candidates successfully complete an internship under the supervision of knowledgeable, expert
    practitioners that engages candidates in multiple and diverse school settings and provides candidates
    with coherent, authentic, and sustained opportunities to synthesize and apply the knowledge and skills
    identified in NELP standards 1–7 in ways that approximate the full range of responsibilities required of
    building-level leaders and enable them to promote the current and future success and well-being of
    each student and adult in their school.

    Component 8.1 Candidates are provided a variety of coherent, authentic field and/or clinical internship
    experiences within multiple school environments that afford opportunities to interact with stakeholders,
    synthesize and apply the content knowledge, and develop and refine the professional skills articulated in
    each of the components included in NELP building-level program standards 1–7.

    Component 8.2 Candidates are provided a minimum of six months of concentrated (10–15 hours per
    week) internship or clinical experiences that include authentic leadership activities within a school
    setting.

    Component 8.3 Candidates are provided a mentor who has demonstrated effectiveness as an
    educational leader within a building setting; is present for a significant portion of the internship; is
    selected collaboratively by the intern, a representative of the school and/or district, and program
    faculty; and has received training from the supervising institution.

    **## FE2.docx**

    **FIELD EXPERIENCE REPORT**

    **Student’s Name: Date of Completion:**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | **TITLE OF THE ACTIVITY** | **KNOWLEDGE**<br>(Check one) | **NELP/PSEL STANDARDS ADDRESSED** |
    | Evaluation Procedures for Non-Certificated Personnel | New _____<br>Changed _______<br>Reinforced __________ | NELP:<br>PSEL: |

    **directions: F** ield Experience: Evaluation Procedures for Non-Certificated Personnel – Review district procedures for evaluating non-certificated personnel and discuss with an administrator how the negotiated contract influences the process. Summarize and reflect on the findings. (Note: Non-certificated are those employees who are considered classified personnel. This group typically includes clerical, instructional assistants, maintenance, etc.)

    **Summary** (provide a clear and concise description of the information you collected and additional details as needed)

    **Reflection**(share your thoughts about the experience and how this information has broadened your understanding of school leadership)

    **## PSELStandards.pdf**

    PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS FOR EDUCATIONAL LEADERS (PSELs)

    For the full standards document visit https://www.wallacefoundation.org/knowledge-
    center/Documents/Professional-Standards-for-Educational-Leaders-2015.pdf

    Standard 1. Mission, Vision, and Core Values

    Effective educational leaders develop, advocate, and enact a shared mission, vision, and core
    values of high-quality education and academic success and well-being of each student.

    Standard 2. Ethics and Professional Norms

    Effective educational leaders act ethically and according to professional norms to promote each
    student’s academic success and well-being.

    Standard 3. Equity and Cultural Responsiveness

    Effective educational leaders strive for equity of educational opportunity and culturally
    responsive practices to promote each student’s academic success and well-being.

    Standard 4. Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment

    Effective educational leaders develop and support intellectually rigorous and coherent systems
    of curriculum, instruction, and assessment promote each student’s academic success and well-

    being.

    Standard 5. Community of Care and Support for Students

    Effective educational leaders cultivate an inclusive, caring, and supportive school community
    that promotes the academic success and well-being of each student.

    Standard 6. Professional Capacity of School Personnel

    Effective educational leaders develop the professional capacity and practice of school
    personnel to promote each student’s academic success and well-being.

    [https://www.wallacefoundation.org/knowledge-center/Documents/Professional-Standards-for-Educational-Leaders-2015.pdf](https://www.wallacefoundation.org/knowledge-center/Documents/Professional-Standards-for-Educational-Leaders-2015.pdf)

    [https://www.wallacefoundation.org/knowledge-center/Documents/Professional-Standards-for-Educational-Leaders-2015.pdf](https://www.wallacefoundation.org/knowledge-center/Documents/Professional-Standards-for-Educational-Leaders-2015.pdf)

    Standard 7. Professional Community for Teachers and Staff

    Effective educational leaders foster a professional community of teachers and other
    professional staff to promote each student’s academic success and well-being.

    Standards 8. Meaningful Engagement of Families and Community

    Effective educational leaders engage families and the community in meaningful, reciprocal, and
    mutually beneficial ways to promote each student’s academic success and well-being.

    Standard 9. Operations and Management

    Effective educational leaders manage school operations and resources to promote each
    student’s academic success and well-being.

    Standard 10. School Improvement

    Effective educational leaders act as agents of continuous improvement to promote each
    student’s academic success and well-being.

    **## NELPStandards.pdf**

    NATIONAL EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP PREPARATION (NELP) PROGRAM
    STANDARDS

    For full text visit http://www.npbea.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/NELP-Building-Standards.pdf

    Standard 1: Mission, Vison, and Improvement

    Candidates who successfully complete a building-level educational leadership preparation program
    understand and demonstrate the capacity to promote the current and future success and well-being of
    each student and adult by applying the knowledge, skills, and commitments necessary to collaboratively
    lead, design, and implement a school mission, vision, and process for continuous improvement that
    reflects a core set of values and priorities that include data use, technology, equity, diversity, digital
    citizenship, and community.

    Component 1.1 Program completers understand and demonstrate the capacity to collaboratively
    evaluate, develop, and communicate a school mission and vision designed to reflect a core set of values
    and priorities that include data use, technology, equity, diversity, digital citizenship, and community.

    Component 1.2 Program completers understand and demonstrate the capacity to lead improvement
    processes that include data use, design, implementation, and evaluation

    Standard 2 Ethics and Professional Norms

    Candidates who successfully complete a building-level educational leadership preparation program
    understand and demonstrate the capacity to promote the current and future success and well-being of
    each student and adult by applying the knowledge, skills, and commitments necessary to understand
    and demonstrate the capacity to advocate for ethical decisions and cultivate and enact professional
    norms.

    Component 2.1 Program completers understand and demonstrate the capacity to reflect on,
    communicate about, cultivate, and model professional dispositions and norms (i.e., fairness, integrity,
    transparency, trust, digital citizenship, collaboration, perseverance, reflection, lifelong learning) that
    support the educational success and well-being of each student and adult.

    Component 2.2 Program completers understand and demonstrate the capacity to evaluate,
    communicate about, and advocate for ethical and legal decisions.

    Component 2.3 Program completers understand and demonstrate the capacity to model ethical
    behavior in their personal conduct and relationships and to cultivate ethical behavior in others.

    [http://www.npbea.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/NELP-Building-Standards.pdf](http://www.npbea.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/NELP-Building-Standards.pdf)

    Standards 3: Equity, Inclusiveness, and Cultural Responsiveness

    Candidates who successfully complete a building-level educational leadership preparation program
    understand and demonstrate the capacity to promote the current and future success and well-being of
    each student and adult by applying the knowledge, skills, and commitments necessary to develop and
    maintain a supportive, equitable, culturally responsive, and inclusive school culture.

    Component 3.1 Program completers understand and demonstrate the capacity to use data to evaluate,
    design, cultivate, and advocate for a supportive and inclusive school culture.

    Component 3.2 Program completers understand and demonstrate the capacity to evaluate, cultivate,
    and advocate for equitable access to educational resources, technologies, and opportunities that
    support the educational success and well-being of each student.

    Component 3.3 Program completers understand and demonstrate the capacity to evaluate, cultivate,
    and advocate for equitable, inclusive, and culturally responsive instruction and behavior support
    practices among teachers and staff.

    Standard 4: Learning and Instruction

    Candidates who successfully complete a building-level educational leadership preparation program
    understand and demonstrate the capacity to promote the current and future success and well-being of
    each student and adult by applying the knowledge, skills, and commitments necessary to evaluate,
    develop, and implement coherent systems of curriculum, instruction, data systems, supports, and
    assessment.

    Component 4.1 Program completers understand and can demonstrate the capacity to evaluate,
    develop, and implement high-quality, technology-rich curricula programs and other supports for
    academic and non-academic student programs.

    Component 4.2 Program completers understand and can demonstrate the capacity to evaluate,
    develop, and implement high-quality and equitable academic and non-academic instructional practices,
    resources, technologies, and services that support equity, digital literacy, and the school’s academic and
    non-academic systems.

    Component 4.3 Program completers understand and can demonstrate the capacity to evaluate,
    develop, and implement formal and informal culturally responsive and accessible assessments that
    support data-informed instructional improvement and student learning and well-being.

    Component 4.4 Program completers understand and demonstrate the capacity to collaboratively
    evaluate, develop, and implement the school’s curriculum, instruction, technology, data systems, and
    assessment practices in a coherent, equitable, and systematic manner

    Standards 5: Community and External Leadership

    Candidates who successfully complete a building-level educational leadership preparation program
    understand and demonstrate the capacity to promote the current and future success and well-being of
    each student and adult by applying the knowledge, skills, and commitments necessary to engage
    families, community, and school personnel in order to strengthen student learning, support school
    improvement, and advocate for the needs of their school and community.

    Component 5.1 Program completers understand and demonstrate the capacity to collaboratively
    engage diverse families in strengthening student learning in and out of school.

    Component 5.2 Program completers understand and demonstrate the capacity to collaboratively
    engage and cultivate relationships with diverse community members, partners, and other constituencies
    for the benefit of school improvement and student development.

    Component 5.3 Program completers understand and demonstrate the capacity to communicate through
    oral, written, and digital means within the larger organizational, community, and political contexts when
    advocating for the needs of their school and community.

    Standard 6: Operations and management

    Candidates who successfully complete a building-level educational leadership preparation program
    understand and demonstrate the capacity to promote the current and future success and well-being of
    each student and adult by applying the knowledge, skills, and commitments necessary to improve
    management, communication, technology, school-level governance, and operation systems to develop
    and improve data-informed and equitable school resource plans and to apply laws, policies, and
    regulations.

    Component 6.1 Program completers understand and demonstrate the capacity to evaluate, develop,
    and implement management, communication, technology, school-level governance, and operation
    systems that support each student’s learning needs and promote the mission and vision of the school.

    Component 6.2 Program completers understand and demonstrate the capacity to evaluate, develop,
    and advocate for a data-informed and equitable resourcing plan that supports school improvement and
    student development.

    Component 6.3 Program completers understand and demonstrate the capacity to reflectively evaluate,
    communicate about, and implement laws, rights, policies, and regulations to promote student and adult
    success and well-being

    Standard 7: Building Professional Capital

    Candidates who successfully complete a building-level educational leadership preparation program
    understand and demonstrate the capacity to promote the current and future success and well-being of
    each student and adult by applying the knowledge, skills, and commitments necessary to build the
    school’s professional capacity, engage staff in the development of a collaborative professional culture,
    and improve systems of staff supervision, evaluation, support, and professional learning.

    Component 7.1 Program completers understand and have the capacity to collaboratively develop the
    school’s professional capacity through engagement in recruiting, selecting, and hiring staff.

    Component 7.2 Program completers understand and have the capacity to develop and engage staff in a
    collaborative professional culture designed to promote school improvement, teacher retention, and the
    success and well-being of each student and adult in the school.

    Component 7.3 Program completers understand and have the capacity to personally engage in, as well
    as collaboratively engage school staff in, professional learning designed to promote reflection, cultural
    responsiveness, distributed leadership, digital literacy, school improvement, and student success.

    Component 7.4 Program completers understand and have the capacity to evaluate, develop, and
    implement systems of supervision, support, and evaluation designed to promote school improvement
    and student success

    Standard 8: Internship

    Candidates successfully complete an internship under the supervision of knowledgeable, expert
    practitioners that engages candidates in multiple and diverse school settings and provides candidates
    with coherent, authentic, and sustained opportunities to synthesize and apply the knowledge and skills
    identified in NELP standards 1–7 in ways that approximate the full range of responsibilities required of
    building-level leaders and enable them to promote the current and future success and well-being of
    each student and adult in their school.

    Component 8.1 Candidates are provided a variety of coherent, authentic field and/or clinical internship
    experiences within multiple school environments that afford opportunities to interact with stakeholders,
    synthesize and apply the content knowledge, and develop and refine the professional skills articulated in
    each of the components included in NELP building-level program standards 1–7.

    Component 8.2 Candidates are provided a minimum of six months of concentrated (10–15 hours per
    week) internship or clinical experiences that include authentic leadership activities within a school
    setting.

    Component 8.3 Candidates are provided a mentor who has demonstrated effectiveness as an
    educational leader within a building setting; is present for a significant portion of the internship; is
    selected collaboratively by the intern, a representative of the school and/or district, and program
    faculty; and has received training from the supervising institution.

  • [Solved] Nursing

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    ### **To Prepare** – Review the resources provided in the Nursing Informatics Competencies. ### **By Day 3 of Week 10** **Post a cohesive response to the following:** – Consider all that you already knew and what you have learned in this class. What are the key informatics competencies that you feel…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    ### **To Prepare**

    – Review the resources provided in the Nursing Informatics Competencies.

    ### **By Day 3 of Week 10**

    **Post a cohesive response to the following:**

    – Consider all that you already knew and what you have learned in this class. What are the key informatics competencies that you feel every nurse should possess? How can those competencies impact improvements in healthcare outcomes in your organization?

  • [Solved] biology

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering biology.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Discussion Response

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Accounting homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-accounting) Please see attachment. In your responses, evaluate the conclusions made by your classmates regarding loan request of this company, the possible source of funding to expand the market in a fo2. reign country, a…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Accounting homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/business-finance-accounting)

    Please see attachment.

    In your responses, evaluate the conclusions made by your classmates regarding loan request of this company, the possible source of funding to expand the market in a fo2. reign country, and whether you agree with these.

    – [\
    \
    Week4discussionresponse.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/week4discussionresponse-docx-10491111 "Week4discussionresponse.docx")
    – [\
    \
    FINDiscussionRubric2.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/findiscussionrubric2-docx "FINDiscussionRubric2.docx")

  • [Solved] home work

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Sociology homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/social-science-sociology) **files (1)** – ## DLV5.docx **## DLV5.docx** **Scenario** Ross and Kristina Brown, who met on a dating website, have come a long way since their initial online connection. Hailing from Florida and Connecticut res…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Sociology homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/social-science-sociology)

    **files (1)**

    – ## DLV5.docx

    **## DLV5.docx**

    **Scenario**

    Ross and Kristina Brown, who met on a dating website, have come a long way since their initial online connection. Hailing from Florida and Connecticut respectively, they now find themselves married with two children, Nate and Samantha. Much like their own journey, the majority of their friends have also found life partners through online dating platforms, reflecting a societal shift in how relationships are formed.

    Ross, who continues to work remotely, starts his day with the familiar sound of his phone alarm. Checking his Google calendar, he prepares for the day's meetings while still in the comfort of his home. Meanwhile, Kristina, after waking up, immediately checks her phone to gauge the day's weather. This information is crucial for her decision on whether to commute to the workplace or stay home, as her company has embraced remote work for several departments, leading to cost savings in terms of office space.

    Their children, Nate and Samantha, are growing up in a world where technology plays a significant role in their education. They rely on e-books and online resources for tests and assignments, with Kristina often lending a helping hand with their homework tasks. For lunchtime convenience, Kristina often orders food through services like Grubhub or UberEats, taking advantage of the online business model that has transformed the food industry. However, amidst this convenience, Kristina is mindful of the challenges faced by traditional industry workers, particularly waitstaff, who are at risk of job loss due to the shift towards online ordering and delivery.

    **Instructions**

    **Important: Before starting, be sure to review this assignment's rubric as it will help you narrow the scope of your work.**

    Your task is to create a PowerPoint presentation that delves into the comparisons between the Browns' lives and your own in the era of technology. Each social structure—Family Life, Workplace, Dating and Marriage, and the Food Industry—should be allocated a dedicated slide. Utilize the introductory slide to set the context and provide a seamless flow between each section. The concluding slide should wrap up the key insights and leave a lasting impression.

    **Submission**

    Once you have crafted your PowerPoint presentation, submit your assignment via the designated drop box. Ensure each slide thoroughly explores and compares the respective aspects of the Browns' lives to your own. The presentation should seamlessly weave a narrative that highlights the transformations and dependencies brought about by technology in these social structures. This will be a crucial step in showcasing your understanding of the impact of technology on various aspects of contemporary life.

    **## DLV5.docx**

    **Scenario**

    Ross and Kristina Brown, who met on a dating website, have come a long way since their initial online connection. Hailing from Florida and Connecticut respectively, they now find themselves married with two children, Nate and Samantha. Much like their own journey, the majority of their friends have also found life partners through online dating platforms, reflecting a societal shift in how relationships are formed.

    Ross, who continues to work remotely, starts his day with the familiar sound of his phone alarm. Checking his Google calendar, he prepares for the day's meetings while still in the comfort of his home. Meanwhile, Kristina, after waking up, immediately checks her phone to gauge the day's weather. This information is crucial for her decision on whether to commute to the workplace or stay home, as her company has embraced remote work for several departments, leading to cost savings in terms of office space.

    Their children, Nate and Samantha, are growing up in a world where technology plays a significant role in their education. They rely on e-books and online resources for tests and assignments, with Kristina often lending a helping hand with their homework tasks. For lunchtime convenience, Kristina often orders food through services like Grubhub or UberEats, taking advantage of the online business model that has transformed the food industry. However, amidst this convenience, Kristina is mindful of the challenges faced by traditional industry workers, particularly waitstaff, who are at risk of job loss due to the shift towards online ordering and delivery.

    **Instructions**

    **Important: Before starting, be sure to review this assignment's rubric as it will help you narrow the scope of your work.**

    Your task is to create a PowerPoint presentation that delves into the comparisons between the Browns' lives and your own in the era of technology. Each social structure—Family Life, Workplace, Dating and Marriage, and the Food Industry—should be allocated a dedicated slide. Utilize the introductory slide to set the context and provide a seamless flow between each section. The concluding slide should wrap up the key insights and leave a lasting impression.

    **Submission**

    Once you have crafted your PowerPoint presentation, submit your assignment via the designated drop box. Ensure each slide thoroughly explores and compares the respective aspects of the Browns' lives to your own. The presentation should seamlessly weave a narrative that highlights the transformations and dependencies brought about by technology in these social structures. This will be a crucial step in showcasing your understanding of the impact of technology on various aspects of contemporary life.

  • [Solved] HW 4

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    _**Please be sure to upload the document with your answers in it. Double check your submission, accidentally submitting a blank assignment is not a valid excuse.**_ Please write your responses in a different color than black (any color is fine!). – [\ \ IndividualAssignment234_APAstyleBLANK.docx]…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    _**Please be sure to upload the document with your answers in it. Double check your submission, accidentally submitting a blank assignment is not a valid excuse.**_ Please write your responses in a different color than black (any color is fine!).

    – [\
    \
    IndividualAssignment234_APAstyleBLANK.docx](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/individualassignment234-apastyleblank-docx "IndividualAssignment234_APAstyleBLANK.docx")

  • [Solved] 713

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Due in 5 hours 4 pages **files (1)** – ## 713.docx **## 713.docx** Prior to beginning work on this assignment, · Review Chapter 11 from your textbook, _Criminal Justice Ethics: Theory and Practice_. · Review the article [Police Social Media and Broadcast News: An Investigation into the Impact of Pol…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Due in 5 hours 4 pages

    **files (1)**

    – ## 713.docx

    **## 713.docx**

    Prior to beginning work on this assignment,

    · Review Chapter 11 from your textbook,
    _Criminal Justice Ethics: Theory and Practice_.

    · Review the article
    [Police Social Media and Broadcast News: An Investigation into the Impact of Police Use of Facebook on Journalists’ Gatekeeping RoleLinks to an external site.](https://research.ebsco.com/c/6cb5lq/viewer/pdf/glzoxeq5sz).

    · Review the video,
    [_Mass Killings: The Role of the Media_ Links to an external site.](https://fod-infobase-com.eu1.proxy.openathens.net/p_ViewVideo.aspx?xtid=289803).

    The media plays a major part in all facets of U.S. society. Increased attention to criminal justice issues and criminal justice administration by the media creates opportunities and threats to the status quo of criminal justice policies and actions. Chapters 11 and 16 in your text discuss the influence of the media on criminal justice and the theories of justice.

    For this assignment, you will support evaluating public issues that criminal justice organizations face in ethical decision-making and creating standards for ethical and moral conduct in criminal justice situations.

    In your paper,

    · Create an ethics policy for the media in handling the reporting of criminal justice issues and news.

    · Examine the significance of political bias in reporting.

    · Construct a foundation for the accurate and ethical reporting of news about the criminal justice system.

    The Ethics, Media, and Criminal Justice paper

    · must be 3 to 4 double-spaced pages in length (

    must use at least 2 scholarly, peer-reviewed, credible sources in addition to the course text

    your introduction paragraph needs to end with a clear thesis statement that indicates the purpose of your paper.

    **## 713.docx**

    Prior to beginning work on this assignment,

    · Review Chapter 11 from your textbook,
    _Criminal Justice Ethics: Theory and Practice_.

    · Review the article
    [Police Social Media and Broadcast News: An Investigation into the Impact of Police Use of Facebook on Journalists’ Gatekeeping RoleLinks to an external site.](https://research.ebsco.com/c/6cb5lq/viewer/pdf/glzoxeq5sz).

    · Review the video,
    [_Mass Killings: The Role of the Media_ Links to an external site.](https://fod-infobase-com.eu1.proxy.openathens.net/p_ViewVideo.aspx?xtid=289803).

    The media plays a major part in all facets of U.S. society. Increased attention to criminal justice issues and criminal justice administration by the media creates opportunities and threats to the status quo of criminal justice policies and actions. Chapters 11 and 16 in your text discuss the influence of the media on criminal justice and the theories of justice.

    For this assignment, you will support evaluating public issues that criminal justice organizations face in ethical decision-making and creating standards for ethical and moral conduct in criminal justice situations.

    In your paper,

    · Create an ethics policy for the media in handling the reporting of criminal justice issues and news.

    · Examine the significance of political bias in reporting.

    · Construct a foundation for the accurate and ethical reporting of news about the criminal justice system.

    The Ethics, Media, and Criminal Justice paper

    · must be 3 to 4 double-spaced pages in length (

    must use at least 2 scholarly, peer-reviewed, credible sources in addition to the course text

    your introduction paragraph needs to end with a clear thesis statement that indicates the purpose of your paper.