My Blog

Tag: Model Answer

  • [Solved] What is Methodology

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    [>Statistics homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/mathematics-statistics) How do I identify specific mixed-methods designs (e.g., convergent parallel, explanatory sequential) and how do I make clear the sequence and Priority of qualitative vs. quantitative strands. Which one should I do …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    [>Statistics homework help](https://www.sweetstudy.com/fields/mathematics-statistics)

    How do I identify specific mixed-methods designs (e.g., convergent parallel, explanatory sequential) and how do I make clear the sequence and Priority of qualitative vs. quantitative strands. Which one should I do first and second? How can I integrate the two?

    How do i fully explain the justification for secondary data analysis?

  • [Solved] Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (1)** – ## ArticleGradingTable.docx **## ArticleGradingTable.docx** **Module 6:** _Article Grading Table_ **Instructions** Prepare a data extraction of 5 peer reviewed journals. As a DNP, you need to be able to evaluate peer reviewed journals and appropriately appraise the articles to evalua…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (1)**

    – ## ArticleGradingTable.docx

    **## ArticleGradingTable.docx**

    **Module 6:** _Article Grading Table_

    **Instructions**

    Prepare a data extraction of 5 peer reviewed journals. As a DNP, you need to be able to evaluate peer reviewed journals and appropriately appraise the articles to evaluate if the information can be used to answer the clinical question.

    **Clinical Question:**

    In patients diagnosed with Tuberculosis
    **(P)** is a CT scan
    **(I)** compared to MRI
    **(C)** more accurate diagnosing
    **(O)** TB caverns during patient assessment T?

    P = Patient Population – TB Patients

    I = Intervention or issue – CT scan

    C = Comparison Intervention or Status – Comparison of a CT vs MRI

    O = Outcome – Diagnosing accuracy (TB Caverns)

    T: Time – Patient assessment

    Based on the question above please complete the following:

    1. Find 5 peer reviewed journals articles

    2. Read the articles (take notes, look for key points)

    3. Fill out the form for each article – John Hopkins Article Appraisal Form (Microsoft Word file)

    4. Return the forms for evaluation and grading

    **Use an Essay Format**

    · You must present your writing double-spaced, in a Times New Roman, Arial or Courier New font, with a font size of 12.

    · Pay attention to grammar rules (spelling and syntax).

    · Your work must be original and must not contain material copied from books or the internet.

    · When citing the work of other authors, include citations and references using APA style to respect their intellectual property and avoid plagiarism.

    · Remember that your writing must have a header or a cover page that includes the name of the institution, the program, the course code, the title of the activity, your name and student number, and the assignment's due date.

    Contribute a minimum of 5 pages. It should include at least 3 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

    Be sure to review the
    [academic expectations](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/1876/pages/expectations-and-best-practices-for-assignments) for your submission.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · Submit your assignment by 11:59 PM Eastern on Sunday.

    · Review the rubric to determine how your assignment will be graded.

    · Your assignment will be run through Turnitin to check for plagiarism.

    **fficial Rubric for Case Study Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | – Official Rubric for Case Study Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking and Logical Reasoning<br>Development of Ideas | **40 to >36.0 ptsExcellent** The case study provided all basic and complex details are considered, and the situation, problem, or diagnosis is identified. Next, the thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents excellent evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information.<br> <br>**36 to >32.0 ptsGood** The case study provided the most basic and complex details are considered, and the situation, problem, or diagnosis is identified. Next, the thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents good evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information.<br> <br>**32 to >28.0 ptsFair** The case study provided some basic and complex details, identifying the situation, problem, or diagnosis. Next, the thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents limited evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information.<br> <br>**28 to >24.0 ptsPoor** The case study provided only minimal details and lacked a clear identification of the situation, problem, or diagnosis. The thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is not linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents weak or no evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information.<br> <br>**24 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 40 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent<br>Mastery | **25 to >23.0 ptsExcellent** The response shows exemplary mastery of the theoretical concepts applicable to the situation, recognizing all basic and complex factors. Furthermore, based on the case study presented, the response exceeds the requested information.<br> <br>**23 to >20.0 ptsGood** The response shows good mastery of the theoretical concepts applicable to the situation, recognizing the most basic and complex factors. Based on the situation presented, the response complies with the information requested.<br> <br>**20 to >18.0 ptsFair** The response shows fair mastery of the theoretical concepts applicable to the situation, recognizing the basic factors. However, based on the situation presented, the response minimally complies with the information requested.<br> <br>**18 to >15.0 ptsPoor** The response does not show mastery of the professional theoretical concepts applicable to the situation. Analysis misses many factors and details. The response does not comply with the information requested.<br> <br>**15 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 25 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInformation Literacy<br>Quality of Resources | **15 to >14.0 ptsExcellent** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, up to date (depending on what is acceptable in the field), from credible and trusted sources, and the number of sources meets the requested amount.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsGood** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 1 source is not a credible and trusted source; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount.<br> <br>**12 to >11.0 ptsFair** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 2 or more sources are not credible and trusted sources; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount.<br> <br>**11 to >9.0 ptsPoor** The following criteria would apply, supporting information is not pertinent to the topic, none of the sources are from credible or trusted sources, or the number of sources requested was not met.<br> <br>**9 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** Resources did not reflect the requested outcomes, were off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 15 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting<br>Mechanics, Grammar, and APA | **10 to >9.0 ptsExcellent** Excellence in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure. Sentences are not too long and are complete sentences.<br> <br>**9 to >8.0 ptsGood** Minimal (1 – 3) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**8 to >7.0 ptsFair** Multiple (4 -7) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**7 to >6.0 ptsPoor** Severe (8 – 10) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**6 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** Unacceptable (11 or more) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. | 10 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormat<br>Organization and Presentation of Information | **10 to >9.0 ptsExcellent** The document has a high level of professional appearance. Material is formatted exceptionally well, presented in a highly organized fashion, and aligned with assignment requirements. Includes sections and subtitles as required.<br> <br>**9 to >8.0 ptsGood** The document has a good, professional appearance. Overall, the material is formatted and presented in an organized fashion, aligned with assignment requirements. Includes sections and subtitles as required.<br> <br>**8 to >7.0 ptsFair** The presentation of information does not appear professional or approaching proficiency. For example, the assignment missed required sections, subtitles, or other elements.<br> <br>**7 to >6.0 ptsPoor** The presentation of information lacks a clear demonstration of a professional appearance. The assignment is missing several required sections, subtitles, or other elements.<br> <br>**6 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 10 pts |

    Total Points: 100

    **## ArticleGradingTable.docx**

    **Module 6:** _Article Grading Table_

    **Instructions**

    Prepare a data extraction of 5 peer reviewed journals. As a DNP, you need to be able to evaluate peer reviewed journals and appropriately appraise the articles to evaluate if the information can be used to answer the clinical question.

    **Clinical Question:**

    In patients diagnosed with Tuberculosis
    **(P)** is a CT scan
    **(I)** compared to MRI
    **(C)** more accurate diagnosing
    **(O)** TB caverns during patient assessment T?

    P = Patient Population – TB Patients

    I = Intervention or issue – CT scan

    C = Comparison Intervention or Status – Comparison of a CT vs MRI

    O = Outcome – Diagnosing accuracy (TB Caverns)

    T: Time – Patient assessment

    Based on the question above please complete the following:

    1. Find 5 peer reviewed journals articles

    2. Read the articles (take notes, look for key points)

    3. Fill out the form for each article – John Hopkins Article Appraisal Form (Microsoft Word file)

    4. Return the forms for evaluation and grading

    **Use an Essay Format**

    · You must present your writing double-spaced, in a Times New Roman, Arial or Courier New font, with a font size of 12.

    · Pay attention to grammar rules (spelling and syntax).

    · Your work must be original and must not contain material copied from books or the internet.

    · When citing the work of other authors, include citations and references using APA style to respect their intellectual property and avoid plagiarism.

    · Remember that your writing must have a header or a cover page that includes the name of the institution, the program, the course code, the title of the activity, your name and student number, and the assignment's due date.

    Contribute a minimum of 5 pages. It should include at least 3 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

    Be sure to review the
    [academic expectations](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/1876/pages/expectations-and-best-practices-for-assignments) for your submission.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · Submit your assignment by 11:59 PM Eastern on Sunday.

    · Review the rubric to determine how your assignment will be graded.

    · Your assignment will be run through Turnitin to check for plagiarism.

    **fficial Rubric for Case Study Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | – Official Rubric for Case Study Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking and Logical Reasoning<br>Development of Ideas | **40 to >36.0 ptsExcellent** The case study provided all basic and complex details are considered, and the situation, problem, or diagnosis is identified. Next, the thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents excellent evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information.<br> <br>**36 to >32.0 ptsGood** The case study provided the most basic and complex details are considered, and the situation, problem, or diagnosis is identified. Next, the thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents good evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information.<br> <br>**32 to >28.0 ptsFair** The case study provided some basic and complex details, identifying the situation, problem, or diagnosis. Next, the thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents limited evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information.<br> <br>**28 to >24.0 ptsPoor** The case study provided only minimal details and lacked a clear identification of the situation, problem, or diagnosis. The thought process to present alternatives, solutions, or the required information is not linked to the analysis. Finally, the student presents weak or no evidence, arguments, or examples to support the alternatives, solutions, or the required information.<br> <br>**24 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 40 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent<br>Mastery | **25 to >23.0 ptsExcellent** The response shows exemplary mastery of the theoretical concepts applicable to the situation, recognizing all basic and complex factors. Furthermore, based on the case study presented, the response exceeds the requested information.<br> <br>**23 to >20.0 ptsGood** The response shows good mastery of the theoretical concepts applicable to the situation, recognizing the most basic and complex factors. Based on the situation presented, the response complies with the information requested.<br> <br>**20 to >18.0 ptsFair** The response shows fair mastery of the theoretical concepts applicable to the situation, recognizing the basic factors. However, based on the situation presented, the response minimally complies with the information requested.<br> <br>**18 to >15.0 ptsPoor** The response does not show mastery of the professional theoretical concepts applicable to the situation. Analysis misses many factors and details. The response does not comply with the information requested.<br> <br>**15 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 25 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInformation Literacy<br>Quality of Resources | **15 to >14.0 ptsExcellent** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, up to date (depending on what is acceptable in the field), from credible and trusted sources, and the number of sources meets the requested amount.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsGood** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 1 source is not a credible and trusted source; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount.<br> <br>**12 to >11.0 ptsFair** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 2 or more sources are not credible and trusted sources; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount.<br> <br>**11 to >9.0 ptsPoor** The following criteria would apply, supporting information is not pertinent to the topic, none of the sources are from credible or trusted sources, or the number of sources requested was not met.<br> <br>**9 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** Resources did not reflect the requested outcomes, were off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 15 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting<br>Mechanics, Grammar, and APA | **10 to >9.0 ptsExcellent** Excellence in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure. Sentences are not too long and are complete sentences.<br> <br>**9 to >8.0 ptsGood** Minimal (1 – 3) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**8 to >7.0 ptsFair** Multiple (4 -7) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**7 to >6.0 ptsPoor** Severe (8 – 10) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**6 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** Unacceptable (11 or more) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. | 10 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormat<br>Organization and Presentation of Information | **10 to >9.0 ptsExcellent** The document has a high level of professional appearance. Material is formatted exceptionally well, presented in a highly organized fashion, and aligned with assignment requirements. Includes sections and subtitles as required.<br> <br>**9 to >8.0 ptsGood** The document has a good, professional appearance. Overall, the material is formatted and presented in an organized fashion, aligned with assignment requirements. Includes sections and subtitles as required.<br> <br>**8 to >7.0 ptsFair** The presentation of information does not appear professional or approaching proficiency. For example, the assignment missed required sections, subtitles, or other elements.<br> <br>**7 to >6.0 ptsPoor** The presentation of information lacks a clear demonstration of a professional appearance. The assignment is missing several required sections, subtitles, or other elements.<br> <br>**6 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 10 pts |

    Total Points: 100

  • [Solved] V HLS

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    see attached **files (2)** – ## V.docx – ## UnitV.pdf **## V.docx** The Office of Innovation and Collaboration is the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Science and Technology (S&T) Directorate's conduit to a broad network of external partners. It provides the homeland security community outreach…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    see attached

    **files (2)**

    – ## V.docx

    – ## UnitV.pdf

    **## V.docx**

    The Office of Innovation and Collaboration is the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Science and Technology (S&T) Directorate's conduit to a broad network of external partners. It provides the homeland security community outreach and access to partnerships with world-class subject matter experts, resources, and innovative tools.

    Discuss why it is important to leverage innovation and collaboration relationships with the private sector. Do you believe DHS should prioritize providing federal funding for colleges and universities or grants to private businesses for emerging technologies related research? Why, or why not? Explain your rationale.

    **## UnitV.pdf**

    HLS 3306, Homeland Security Technology 1

    Course Learning Outcomes for Unit V

    Upon completion of this unit, students should be able to:

    1. Examine current technologies used in homeland security.
    1.1 Explain the impact and role of the Internet of Things (IoT) in homeland security.
    1.2 Discuss physical security technologies used to address risk and protect U.S. critical

    infrastructure.

    5. Describe the future of homeland security technologies.
    5.1 Discuss new or emerging physical security technologies used in homeland security.

    Required Unit Resources

    Chapter 6: Physical Security Technologies: Protecting Assets and Critical Infrastructure through
    Technology

    In order to access the following resources, click the links below.

    The following Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency webpage contains links to information on each
    of the critical infrastructure sectors. Information provided includes sector-specific overviews, plans, resources,
    and training.

    Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency. (2020). Critical infrastructure sectors. Department of

    Homeland Security. https://www.cisa.gov/critical-infrastructure-sectors

    Baggott, S. S., & Santos, J. R. (2020). A risk analysis framework for cyber security and critical infrastructure

    protection of the U.S. electric power grid. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 40(9), 1744–1761.
    https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?dire
    ct=true&db=bsu&AN=146025874&site=ehost-live&scope=site

    Unit Lesson

    The lesson for this unit is presented in the following PowerPoint presentation and consists of both slide
    content and additional information provided in the audio narration. Click the speaker icon if it is shown on a
    slide to hear the additional lesson audio content.

    Unit V Lesson PowerPoint Presentation

    You may also access this presentation with a transcript of the audio portions in printable form in the Unit V
    PowerPoint PDF.

    A transcript for the audio portion of each slide can be viewed in the speaker notes section of each individual
    slide.

    UNIT V STUDY GUIDE

    Technology Innovations and
    Emerging Physical Security
    Technologies in Critical Infrastructures

    [https://www.cisa.gov/critical-infrastructure-sectors](https://www.cisa.gov/critical-infrastructure-sectors)

    [https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bsu&AN=146025874&site=ehost-live&scope=site](https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bsu&AN=146025874&site=ehost-live&scope=site)

    [https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bsu&AN=146025874&site=ehost-live&scope=site](https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bsu&AN=146025874&site=ehost-live&scope=site)

    [https://online.columbiasouthern.edu/bbcswebdav/xid-143935398_1](https://online.columbiasouthern.edu/bbcswebdav/xid-143935398_1)

    [https://online.columbiasouthern.edu/bbcswebdav/xid-143935396_1](https://online.columbiasouthern.edu/bbcswebdav/xid-143935396_1)

    [https://online.columbiasouthern.edu/bbcswebdav/xid-143935396_1](https://online.columbiasouthern.edu/bbcswebdav/xid-143935396_1)

    HLS 3306, Homeland Security Technology 2

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE

    Title

    Suggested Unit Resources

    In order to access the following resource, click the link below.

    The following Department of Homeland Security webpage contains information on federally funded research
    and development centers for homeland-security-related technologies. Follow the links contained on the page
    to learn more about the mission and operation of the Homeland Security Systems Engineering and
    Development Institute (HSSEDI) and the Homeland Security Operational Analysis Center (HSOAC).

    Department of Homeland Security. (n.d). Federally funded research and development centers.

    https://www.dhs.gov/science-and-technology/ffrdcs

    [https://www.dhs.gov/science-and-technology/ffrdcs](https://www.dhs.gov/science-and-technology/ffrdcs)

    – Course Learning Outcomes for Unit V
    – Required Unit Resources
    – Unit Lesson
    – Suggested Unit Resources

    **## UnitV.pdf**

    HLS 3306, Homeland Security Technology 1

    Course Learning Outcomes for Unit V

    Upon completion of this unit, students should be able to:

    1. Examine current technologies used in homeland security.
    1.1 Explain the impact and role of the Internet of Things (IoT) in homeland security.
    1.2 Discuss physical security technologies used to address risk and protect U.S. critical

    infrastructure.

    5. Describe the future of homeland security technologies.
    5.1 Discuss new or emerging physical security technologies used in homeland security.

    Required Unit Resources

    Chapter 6: Physical Security Technologies: Protecting Assets and Critical Infrastructure through
    Technology

    In order to access the following resources, click the links below.

    The following Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency webpage contains links to information on each
    of the critical infrastructure sectors. Information provided includes sector-specific overviews, plans, resources,
    and training.

    Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency. (2020). Critical infrastructure sectors. Department of

    Homeland Security. https://www.cisa.gov/critical-infrastructure-sectors

    Baggott, S. S., & Santos, J. R. (2020). A risk analysis framework for cyber security and critical infrastructure

    protection of the U.S. electric power grid. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 40(9), 1744–1761.
    https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?dire
    ct=true&db=bsu&AN=146025874&site=ehost-live&scope=site

    Unit Lesson

    The lesson for this unit is presented in the following PowerPoint presentation and consists of both slide
    content and additional information provided in the audio narration. Click the speaker icon if it is shown on a
    slide to hear the additional lesson audio content.

    Unit V Lesson PowerPoint Presentation

    You may also access this presentation with a transcript of the audio portions in printable form in the Unit V
    PowerPoint PDF.

    A transcript for the audio portion of each slide can be viewed in the speaker notes section of each individual
    slide.

    UNIT V STUDY GUIDE

    Technology Innovations and
    Emerging Physical Security
    Technologies in Critical Infrastructures

    [https://www.cisa.gov/critical-infrastructure-sectors](https://www.cisa.gov/critical-infrastructure-sectors)

    [https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bsu&AN=146025874&site=ehost-live&scope=site](https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bsu&AN=146025874&site=ehost-live&scope=site)

    [https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bsu&AN=146025874&site=ehost-live&scope=site](https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bsu&AN=146025874&site=ehost-live&scope=site)

    [https://online.columbiasouthern.edu/bbcswebdav/xid-143935398_1](https://online.columbiasouthern.edu/bbcswebdav/xid-143935398_1)

    [https://online.columbiasouthern.edu/bbcswebdav/xid-143935396_1](https://online.columbiasouthern.edu/bbcswebdav/xid-143935396_1)

    [https://online.columbiasouthern.edu/bbcswebdav/xid-143935396_1](https://online.columbiasouthern.edu/bbcswebdav/xid-143935396_1)

    HLS 3306, Homeland Security Technology 2

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE

    Title

    Suggested Unit Resources

    In order to access the following resource, click the link below.

    The following Department of Homeland Security webpage contains information on federally funded research
    and development centers for homeland-security-related technologies. Follow the links contained on the page
    to learn more about the mission and operation of the Homeland Security Systems Engineering and
    Development Institute (HSSEDI) and the Homeland Security Operational Analysis Center (HSOAC).

    Department of Homeland Security. (n.d). Federally funded research and development centers.

    https://www.dhs.gov/science-and-technology/ffrdcs

    [https://www.dhs.gov/science-and-technology/ffrdcs](https://www.dhs.gov/science-and-technology/ffrdcs)

    – Course Learning Outcomes for Unit V
    – Required Unit Resources
    – Unit Lesson
    – Suggested Unit Resources

    **## V.docx**

    The Office of Innovation and Collaboration is the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Science and Technology (S&T) Directorate's conduit to a broad network of external partners. It provides the homeland security community outreach and access to partnerships with world-class subject matter experts, resources, and innovative tools.

    Discuss why it is important to leverage innovation and collaboration relationships with the private sector. Do you believe DHS should prioritize providing federal funding for colleges and universities or grants to private businesses for emerging technologies related research? Why, or why not? Explain your rationale.

    **## UnitV.pdf**

    HLS 3306, Homeland Security Technology 1

    Course Learning Outcomes for Unit V

    Upon completion of this unit, students should be able to:

    1. Examine current technologies used in homeland security.
    1.1 Explain the impact and role of the Internet of Things (IoT) in homeland security.
    1.2 Discuss physical security technologies used to address risk and protect U.S. critical

    infrastructure.

    5. Describe the future of homeland security technologies.
    5.1 Discuss new or emerging physical security technologies used in homeland security.

    Required Unit Resources

    Chapter 6: Physical Security Technologies: Protecting Assets and Critical Infrastructure through
    Technology

    In order to access the following resources, click the links below.

    The following Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency webpage contains links to information on each
    of the critical infrastructure sectors. Information provided includes sector-specific overviews, plans, resources,
    and training.

    Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency. (2020). Critical infrastructure sectors. Department of

    Homeland Security. https://www.cisa.gov/critical-infrastructure-sectors

    Baggott, S. S., & Santos, J. R. (2020). A risk analysis framework for cyber security and critical infrastructure

    protection of the U.S. electric power grid. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 40(9), 1744–1761.
    https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?dire
    ct=true&db=bsu&AN=146025874&site=ehost-live&scope=site

    Unit Lesson

    The lesson for this unit is presented in the following PowerPoint presentation and consists of both slide
    content and additional information provided in the audio narration. Click the speaker icon if it is shown on a
    slide to hear the additional lesson audio content.

    Unit V Lesson PowerPoint Presentation

    You may also access this presentation with a transcript of the audio portions in printable form in the Unit V
    PowerPoint PDF.

    A transcript for the audio portion of each slide can be viewed in the speaker notes section of each individual
    slide.

    UNIT V STUDY GUIDE

    Technology Innovations and
    Emerging Physical Security
    Technologies in Critical Infrastructures

    [https://www.cisa.gov/critical-infrastructure-sectors](https://www.cisa.gov/critical-infrastructure-sectors)

    [https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bsu&AN=146025874&site=ehost-live&scope=site](https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bsu&AN=146025874&site=ehost-live&scope=site)

    [https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bsu&AN=146025874&site=ehost-live&scope=site](https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bsu&AN=146025874&site=ehost-live&scope=site)

    [https://online.columbiasouthern.edu/bbcswebdav/xid-143935398_1](https://online.columbiasouthern.edu/bbcswebdav/xid-143935398_1)

    [https://online.columbiasouthern.edu/bbcswebdav/xid-143935396_1](https://online.columbiasouthern.edu/bbcswebdav/xid-143935396_1)

    [https://online.columbiasouthern.edu/bbcswebdav/xid-143935396_1](https://online.columbiasouthern.edu/bbcswebdav/xid-143935396_1)

    HLS 3306, Homeland Security Technology 2

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE

    Title

    Suggested Unit Resources

    In order to access the following resource, click the link below.

    The following Department of Homeland Security webpage contains information on federally funded research
    and development centers for homeland-security-related technologies. Follow the links contained on the page
    to learn more about the mission and operation of the Homeland Security Systems Engineering and
    Development Institute (HSSEDI) and the Homeland Security Operational Analysis Center (HSOAC).

    Department of Homeland Security. (n.d). Federally funded research and development centers.

    https://www.dhs.gov/science-and-technology/ffrdcs

    [https://www.dhs.gov/science-and-technology/ffrdcs](https://www.dhs.gov/science-and-technology/ffrdcs)

    – Course Learning Outcomes for Unit V
    – Required Unit Resources
    – Unit Lesson
    – Suggested Unit Resources

    **## V.docx**

    The Office of Innovation and Collaboration is the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Science and Technology (S&T) Directorate's conduit to a broad network of external partners. It provides the homeland security community outreach and access to partnerships with world-class subject matter experts, resources, and innovative tools.

    Discuss why it is important to leverage innovation and collaboration relationships with the private sector. Do you believe DHS should prioritize providing federal funding for colleges and universities or grants to private businesses for emerging technologies related research? Why, or why not? Explain your rationale.

    **## UnitV.pdf**

    HLS 3306, Homeland Security Technology 1

    Course Learning Outcomes for Unit V

    Upon completion of this unit, students should be able to:

    1. Examine current technologies used in homeland security.
    1.1 Explain the impact and role of the Internet of Things (IoT) in homeland security.
    1.2 Discuss physical security technologies used to address risk and protect U.S. critical

    infrastructure.

    5. Describe the future of homeland security technologies.
    5.1 Discuss new or emerging physical security technologies used in homeland security.

    Required Unit Resources

    Chapter 6: Physical Security Technologies: Protecting Assets and Critical Infrastructure through
    Technology

    In order to access the following resources, click the links below.

    The following Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency webpage contains links to information on each
    of the critical infrastructure sectors. Information provided includes sector-specific overviews, plans, resources,
    and training.

    Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency. (2020). Critical infrastructure sectors. Department of

    Homeland Security. https://www.cisa.gov/critical-infrastructure-sectors

    Baggott, S. S., & Santos, J. R. (2020). A risk analysis framework for cyber security and critical infrastructure

    protection of the U.S. electric power grid. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 40(9), 1744–1761.
    https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?dire
    ct=true&db=bsu&AN=146025874&site=ehost-live&scope=site

    Unit Lesson

    The lesson for this unit is presented in the following PowerPoint presentation and consists of both slide
    content and additional information provided in the audio narration. Click the speaker icon if it is shown on a
    slide to hear the additional lesson audio content.

    Unit V Lesson PowerPoint Presentation

    You may also access this presentation with a transcript of the audio portions in printable form in the Unit V
    PowerPoint PDF.

    A transcript for the audio portion of each slide can be viewed in the speaker notes section of each individual
    slide.

    UNIT V STUDY GUIDE

    Technology Innovations and
    Emerging Physical Security
    Technologies in Critical Infrastructures

    [https://www.cisa.gov/critical-infrastructure-sectors](https://www.cisa.gov/critical-infrastructure-sectors)

    [https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bsu&AN=146025874&site=ehost-live&scope=site](https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bsu&AN=146025874&site=ehost-live&scope=site)

    [https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bsu&AN=146025874&site=ehost-live&scope=site](https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bsu&AN=146025874&site=ehost-live&scope=site)

    [https://online.columbiasouthern.edu/bbcswebdav/xid-143935398_1](https://online.columbiasouthern.edu/bbcswebdav/xid-143935398_1)

    [https://online.columbiasouthern.edu/bbcswebdav/xid-143935396_1](https://online.columbiasouthern.edu/bbcswebdav/xid-143935396_1)

    [https://online.columbiasouthern.edu/bbcswebdav/xid-143935396_1](https://online.columbiasouthern.edu/bbcswebdav/xid-143935396_1)

    HLS 3306, Homeland Security Technology 2

    UNIT x STUDY GUIDE

    Title

    Suggested Unit Resources

    In order to access the following resource, click the link below.

    The following Department of Homeland Security webpage contains information on federally funded research
    and development centers for homeland-security-related technologies. Follow the links contained on the page
    to learn more about the mission and operation of the Homeland Security Systems Engineering and
    Development Institute (HSSEDI) and the Homeland Security Operational Analysis Center (HSOAC).

    Department of Homeland Security. (n.d). Federally funded research and development centers.

    https://www.dhs.gov/science-and-technology/ffrdcs

    [https://www.dhs.gov/science-and-technology/ffrdcs](https://www.dhs.gov/science-and-technology/ffrdcs)

    – Course Learning Outcomes for Unit V
    – Required Unit Resources
    – Unit Lesson
    – Suggested Unit Resources

  • [Solved] Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (1)** – ## HumanExistenceandUniversalEnergy.docx **## HumanExistenceandUniversalEnergy.docx** **Module 6:** _Human Existence and Universal Energy Models_ **Instructions:** Please choose one of the Models or Theories focused on Human Existence and Universal Energy discussed in this module, de…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (1)**

    – ## HumanExistenceandUniversalEnergy.docx

    **## HumanExistenceandUniversalEnergy.docx**

    **Module 6:** _Human Existence and Universal Energy Models_

    **Instructions:**

    Please choose one of the Models or Theories focused on Human Existence and Universal Energy discussed in this module, define it, and examine literature about the theory identifying other concepts used in theory.

    Contribute a minimum of 4 pages (excluding title page and references page). It should include at least 3 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

    Be sure to review the
    [academic expectations](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/1876/pages/expectations-and-best-practices-for-assignments) for your submission.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · Submit your assignment by 11:59 PM Eastern on Sunday.

    · Review the rubric to determine how your assignment will be graded.

    · Your assignment will be run through Turnitin to check for plagiarism.

    ·
    [File Upload](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/44901/assignments/880075)

    ·
    [Text Entry](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/44901/assignments/880075)

    ·
    [Studio](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/44901/assignments/880075)

    ·
    [Google Drive](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/44901/assignments/880075)

    ·
    [Office 365](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/44901/assignments/880075)

    Top of Form

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | Upload a file, or choose a file you've already uploaded. |
    | Drag a file here, or<br>Choose a file to upload |
    | | |
    | |
    | <="" div="" style="margin: 10px 0px;"><br>I agree to the tool's <br>[End-User License AgreementLinks to an external site.](https://agmu.turnitin.com/integrations/cpf/eula/agmu)<br>This assignment submission is my own, original work<br>* | |
    | |

    Bottom of Form

    Rubric

    **- Official Assignment Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | – Official Assignment Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessionalism<br>Concept Application | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** The student meets 90% to 100% of the required content criteria by mastering both rudimentary and complex elements and, in addition, applying high-level facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. Lastly, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** The student meets 80% to 89% of the required content criteria by recognizing the fundamental, rudimentary, and complex elements and applying proficient facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. Lastly, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** The student meets 70% to 79% of the required content criteria by recognizing rudimentary and complex elements and demonstrating facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. All of the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The student meets less than 70% of the required content criteria with a low-level approach of rudimentary and complex elements and a lack of application facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. However, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar<br>Written Communication | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** Excellence in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure. Sentences are not too long and are complete sentences.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** Minimal (1 – 3) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** Multiple (4 -7) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** Severe (8 – 10) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** Unacceptable (11 or more) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCommunication<br>Specific Formatting | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** The assignment meets 90 % – 100% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. Additionally, the presented information is complete in all the required components and exceeds expectations.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** The assignment meets 80% to 89% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. Additionally, the presented information meets all the necessary components and formatting requirements.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** The assignment meets 70% to 79% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. However, the presented information is missing some key details, but overall does not disrupt the required format.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The assignment meets at most 69% of the required formatting elements in the description. The presented information is missing some key details that disrupt the needed formatting.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical and Logical Thinking<br>Thought analysis process | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** The assignment meets 90% to 100% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, and diagnosis awareness that are accurate and correctly documented. In addition, the analysis offers a clear and concise analysis along with an impeccable and precise, well-thought process.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** The assignment meets 80% to 89% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, and diagnosis awareness which are accurate and correctly documented. The analysis is well communicated, and the fundamental thought process presented in the written piece clearly aligns with the assignment expectations.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** The assignment satisfies 70% to 79% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, or diagnosis awareness but may overlook some essential parameters. The analysis and thought process presented in the written piece is evident; however, still developing.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The assignment meets at most 69% of rudimentary details, situations, problems, or diagnosis awareness, but there was a severe overlook of some essential parameters. In addition, the analysis and thought process presented in the written piece is not evident and not founded on previous discussions or information.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAcademic Literacy<br>Quality of Sources and APA Citations | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, up to date (depending on what is acceptable in the field), from credible and trusted sources, and the number of sources meets the requested amount. Additionally, all sources are recognized or cited properly.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 1 source is not a credible and trusted source; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount. The essay offers correct formatting on the setup, and title page, with minimal formatting or punctuation errors within the in-text citations or references.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 2 or more sources are not credible and trusted sources; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount. The essay offers correct formatting, setup, and title page but has significant errors within in-text citations and references.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The following criteria would apply, supporting information is not pertinent to the topic, none of the sources are from credible or trusted sources, or the number of sources requested was not met. The essay offers severe incorrect APA formatting, setup or missing title page, and/or problematic in-text citations and references.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |

    Total Points: 100

    **## HumanExistenceandUniversalEnergy.docx**

    **Module 6:** _Human Existence and Universal Energy Models_

    **Instructions:**

    Please choose one of the Models or Theories focused on Human Existence and Universal Energy discussed in this module, define it, and examine literature about the theory identifying other concepts used in theory.

    Contribute a minimum of 4 pages (excluding title page and references page). It should include at least 3 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

    Be sure to review the
    [academic expectations](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/1876/pages/expectations-and-best-practices-for-assignments) for your submission.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · Submit your assignment by 11:59 PM Eastern on Sunday.

    · Review the rubric to determine how your assignment will be graded.

    · Your assignment will be run through Turnitin to check for plagiarism.

    ·
    [File Upload](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/44901/assignments/880075)

    ·
    [Text Entry](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/44901/assignments/880075)

    ·
    [Studio](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/44901/assignments/880075)

    ·
    [Google Drive](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/44901/assignments/880075)

    ·
    [Office 365](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/44901/assignments/880075)

    Top of Form

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | Upload a file, or choose a file you've already uploaded. |
    | Drag a file here, or<br>Choose a file to upload |
    | | |
    | |
    | <="" div="" style="margin: 10px 0px;"><br>I agree to the tool's <br>[End-User License AgreementLinks to an external site.](https://agmu.turnitin.com/integrations/cpf/eula/agmu)<br>This assignment submission is my own, original work<br>* | |
    | |

    Bottom of Form

    Rubric

    **- Official Assignment Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | – Official Assignment Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessionalism<br>Concept Application | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** The student meets 90% to 100% of the required content criteria by mastering both rudimentary and complex elements and, in addition, applying high-level facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. Lastly, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** The student meets 80% to 89% of the required content criteria by recognizing the fundamental, rudimentary, and complex elements and applying proficient facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. Lastly, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** The student meets 70% to 79% of the required content criteria by recognizing rudimentary and complex elements and demonstrating facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. All of the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The student meets less than 70% of the required content criteria with a low-level approach of rudimentary and complex elements and a lack of application facts, theories, definitions, and other contextual aspects. However, all the delivered information is compliant with the assignment instructions.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar<br>Written Communication | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** Excellence in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure. Sentences are not too long and are complete sentences.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** Minimal (1 – 3) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** Multiple (4 -7) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** Severe (8 – 10) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** Unacceptable (11 or more) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCommunication<br>Specific Formatting | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** The assignment meets 90 % – 100% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. Additionally, the presented information is complete in all the required components and exceeds expectations.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** The assignment meets 80% to 89% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. Additionally, the presented information meets all the necessary components and formatting requirements.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** The assignment meets 70% to 79% of the required formatting elements in the assignment description. However, the presented information is missing some key details, but overall does not disrupt the required format.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The assignment meets at most 69% of the required formatting elements in the description. The presented information is missing some key details that disrupt the needed formatting.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical and Logical Thinking<br>Thought analysis process | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** The assignment meets 90% to 100% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, and diagnosis awareness that are accurate and correctly documented. In addition, the analysis offers a clear and concise analysis along with an impeccable and precise, well-thought process.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** The assignment meets 80% to 89% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, and diagnosis awareness which are accurate and correctly documented. The analysis is well communicated, and the fundamental thought process presented in the written piece clearly aligns with the assignment expectations.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** The assignment satisfies 70% to 79% of rudimentary and complex details, situations, problems, or diagnosis awareness but may overlook some essential parameters. The analysis and thought process presented in the written piece is evident; however, still developing.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The assignment meets at most 69% of rudimentary details, situations, problems, or diagnosis awareness, but there was a severe overlook of some essential parameters. In addition, the analysis and thought process presented in the written piece is not evident and not founded on previous discussions or information.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAcademic Literacy<br>Quality of Sources and APA Citations | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, up to date (depending on what is acceptable in the field), from credible and trusted sources, and the number of sources meets the requested amount. Additionally, all sources are recognized or cited properly.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 1 source is not a credible and trusted source; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount. The essay offers correct formatting on the setup, and title page, with minimal formatting or punctuation errors within the in-text citations or references.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 2 or more sources are not credible and trusted sources; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount. The essay offers correct formatting, setup, and title page but has significant errors within in-text citations and references.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The following criteria would apply, supporting information is not pertinent to the topic, none of the sources are from credible or trusted sources, or the number of sources requested was not met. The essay offers severe incorrect APA formatting, setup or missing title page, and/or problematic in-text citations and references.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |

    Total Points: 100

  • [Solved] topic 6 dq 1 peer

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    apa style 300 words peer review **files (1)** – ## Topic6DQ1ResptoKatherineCutrightInstructions.docx **## Topic6DQ1ResptoKatherineCutrightInstructions.docx** Katherine Cutright Good morning, In this scenario, my primary responsibility is to protect Doug’s confidentiality while also appropriately int…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    apa style

    300 words

    peer review

    **files (1)**

    – ## Topic6DQ1ResptoKatherineCutrightInstructions.docx

    **## Topic6DQ1ResptoKatherineCutrightInstructions.docx**

    Katherine Cutright

    Good morning,

    In this scenario, my primary responsibility is to protect Doug’s confidentiality while also appropriately interfacing with the legal system. Because Doug is in a publicly funded substance use program, his records are protected not only by HIPAA but also by the stricter federal regulation 42 CFR Part 2, which prohibits disclosure of substance use treatment information without proper written consent or a qualifying court order.

    The ACA Code of Ethics clearly states: “Counselors protect the confidential information of prospective and current clients. Counselors disclose information only with appropriate consent or with sound legal or ethical justification” (American Counseling Association [ACA], 2014, Standard B.1.c). Therefore, I would not immediately release information to the probation officer. My first step would be to review whether Doug has signed a valid Release of Information (ROI) that specifically authorizes communication with the probation officer. If not, I would discuss the request with Doug, explain the potential benefits and risks, and obtain written, time-limited consent if he agrees.

    If Doug were voluntarily attending treatment, my approach would be even more protective, as there would be less legal leverage tied to court involvement. Regardless, any disclosure would be minimal, factual, and clinically appropriate. Consultation, documentation, and adherence to 42 CFR Part 2 would guide ethical decision-making while supporting Doug’s welfare and legal interests.

    References

    American Counseling Association. (2014).ACA code of ethics.
    [https://www.counseling.org/resources/ethics](https://www.counseling.org/resources/ethics?utm_source=chatgpt.com)

    Corey, G., Corey, M. S., & Callanan, P. (2019).Issues and ethics in the helping professions(10th ed.). Cengage Learning.

    **## Topic6DQ1ResptoKatherineCutrightInstructions.docx**

    Katherine Cutright

    Good morning,

    In this scenario, my primary responsibility is to protect Doug’s confidentiality while also appropriately interfacing with the legal system. Because Doug is in a publicly funded substance use program, his records are protected not only by HIPAA but also by the stricter federal regulation 42 CFR Part 2, which prohibits disclosure of substance use treatment information without proper written consent or a qualifying court order.

    The ACA Code of Ethics clearly states: “Counselors protect the confidential information of prospective and current clients. Counselors disclose information only with appropriate consent or with sound legal or ethical justification” (American Counseling Association [ACA], 2014, Standard B.1.c). Therefore, I would not immediately release information to the probation officer. My first step would be to review whether Doug has signed a valid Release of Information (ROI) that specifically authorizes communication with the probation officer. If not, I would discuss the request with Doug, explain the potential benefits and risks, and obtain written, time-limited consent if he agrees.

    If Doug were voluntarily attending treatment, my approach would be even more protective, as there would be less legal leverage tied to court involvement. Regardless, any disclosure would be minimal, factual, and clinically appropriate. Consultation, documentation, and adherence to 42 CFR Part 2 would guide ethical decision-making while supporting Doug’s welfare and legal interests.

    References

    American Counseling Association. (2014).ACA code of ethics.
    [https://www.counseling.org/resources/ethics](https://www.counseling.org/resources/ethics?utm_source=chatgpt.com)

    Corey, G., Corey, M. S., & Callanan, P. (2019).Issues and ethics in the helping professions(10th ed.). Cengage Learning.

  • [Solved] Assigment .Apa seven . All instructions attached.

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (1)** – ## Module6.docx **## Module6.docx** **Module 6:** _Descriptive and Inferential Statistics: Identifying Them in Journals_ **Instructions** Distinguish between the organization of articles by evidence level and organization of articles by clinical question (Essay). Please utilize Figur…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (1)**

    – ## Module6.docx

    **## Module6.docx**

    **Module 6:** _Descriptive and Inferential Statistics: Identifying Them in Journals_

    **Instructions**

    Distinguish between the organization of articles by evidence level and organization of articles by clinical question (Essay). Please utilize Figure 1 John Hopkins Evidence Based-Practice Model for Nursing and Health Care Professionals.

    Once all the articles considered important to answer the clinical question have been gathered, the DNP should be able organize the articles by level of evidence and type of evidence.

    1. What is the purpose of the article organization?

    2. How do you compare the article organization by type of evidence vs the organization based on the type of clinical question?

    3. What is the best way to organize the studies when the organization is based on the clinical question?

    **Use an Essay Format**

    · You must present your writing double-spaced, in a Times New Roman, Arial or Courier New font, with a font size of 12.

    · Pay attention to grammar rules (spelling and syntax).

    · Your work must be original and must not contain material copied from books or the internet.

    · When citing the work of other authors, include citations and references using APA 7th style to respect their intellectual property and avoid plagiarism.

    · Remember that your writing must have a header or a cover page that includes the name of the institution, the program, the course code, the title of the activity, your name and student number, and the assignment's due date.

    Contribute a minimum of 5 pages. It should include at least 3 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

    Be sure to review the
    [academic expectations](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/1876/pages/expectations-and-best-practices-for-assignments) for your submission.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · Submit your assignment by 11:59 PM Eastern on the due date.

    · Review the rubric to determine how your assignment will be graded.

    · Your assignment will be run through Turnitin to check for plagiarism.

    ·
    [File Upload](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/44875/assignments/877917)

    ·
    [Studio](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/44875/assignments/877917)

    ·
    [Google Drive](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/44875/assignments/877917)

    ·
    [Office 365](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/44875/assignments/877917)

    Top of Form

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | Upload a file, or choose a file you've already uploaded. |
    | Drag a file here, or<br>Choose a file to upload |
    | | |
    | |
    | <="" div="" style="margin: 10px 0px;"><br>I agree to the tool's <br>[End-User License Agreement](https://agmu.turnitin.com/integrations/cpf/eula/agmu)<br>This assignment submission is my own, original work<br>* | |
    | |

    Bottom of Form

    Rubric

    **- Official Essay Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | – Official Essay Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent<br>Mastery of the Information | **30 to >27.0 ptsExcellent** The essay content properly aligns with the information requested and reflects student exemplary mastery of the content by showing complete information, details, and examples.<br> <br>**27 to >24.0 ptsGood** The essay content aligns with the information requested and shows good mastery of the content. Provides sufficient information, however missed opportunities to demonstrate supporting details and/or examples.<br> <br>**24 to >21.0 ptsFair** The essay content aligns with the information requested and shows fair mastery of the content. Provides sufficient information, but lacks supporting details and/or examples.<br> <br>**21 to >18.0 ptsPoor** The essay content does not align with the information requested. Does not demonstrate mastery of the concepts.<br> <br>**18 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 30 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization<br>Structure of the Essay | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** The essay has a clear format, an introduction, a body with clear transitions between evidence and supporting arguments, and a conclusion. The information is presented in an orderly manner. All elements facilitate the flow of the information in the document.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** The essay has a clear format, an introduction, a body with evidence, supporting arguments, and a conclusion. All elements facilitate the flow of the information in the document, but the essay may miss transitions between sections or have other small organization issues.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** The essay structure is problematic, lacks logical flow, and has at least one of these issues: The essay does not have a clear introduction or conclusion, or the evidence and supporting arguments are not aligned with the requested requirements.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The essay does not appear to have any structure: no introduction, progression of thought, or defined conclusion.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking<br>Development of Ideas | **15 to >14.0 ptsExcellent** Details are considered, and a point of view, thesis statement, or main idea is clear. Next, the essay presents excellent evidence, arguments, and examples to support the point. Finally, the student draws meaningful and high-level insightful conclusions based on the information presented and explained.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsGood (12 -11 pts)** Details are considered, and a point of view, thesis statement, or main idea is clear. Next, the essay presents sufficient evidence, arguments, or examples to support the point. Finally, it draws appropriate conclusions based on the information presented and explained.<br> <br>**12 to >11.0 ptsFair** Details are considered, and a point of view, thesis statement, or main idea is identified. Next, the essay presents some evidence, arguments, or examples, but some are not relevant to support the point. Student draws fair conclusions, but not all are based on or supported by the presented information.<br> <br>**11 to >9.0 ptsPoor** Details are not considered, and a point of view, thesis statement, or main idea is exceptionally vague. The provided evidence, arguments, or examples are disconnected or not relevant. Additionally, the essay lacks a conclusion or repeats previous statements made.<br> <br>**9 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 15 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInformation Literacy<br>Quality of Resources | **15 to >14.0 ptsExcellent** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, up to date (depending on what is acceptable in the field), from credible and trusted sources, and the number of sources meets the requested amount.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsGood** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 1 source is not a credible and trusted source; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount.<br> <br>**12 to >11.0 ptsFair** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 2 or more sources are not credible and trusted sources; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount.<br> <br>**11 to >9.0 ptsPoor** The following criteria would apply, supporting information is not pertinent to the topic, none of the sources are from credible or trusted sources, or the number of sources requested was not met.<br> <br>**9 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** Resources did not reflect the requested outcomes, were off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 15 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting<br>Mechanics and Grammar | **10 to >9.0 ptsExcellent** Excellence in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure.<br> <br>**9 to >8.0 ptsGood** Minimal (1 – 3) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**8 to >7.0 ptsFair** Multiple (4 -7) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**7 to >5.0 ptsPoor** Severe (8 – 10) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**5 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** Unacceptable (11 or more) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 10 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormatting and APA Guidelines | **10 to >9.0 ptsExcellent** The essay reflects excellent execution and incorporation of APA guidelines. Correct formatting, setup, title page, perfect in-text citations, and reference formatting.<br> <br>**9 to >8.0 ptsGood** The essay offers correct formatting on the setup, and title page, with minimal formatting or punctuation errors within the in-text citations or references.<br> <br>**8 to >6.0 ptsFair** The essay offers correct formatting, setup, and title page but has significant errors within in-text citations and references.<br> <br>**6 to >5.0 ptsPoor** The essay offers severe incorrect APA formatting, setup or missing title page, and/or problematic in-text citations and references.<br> <br>**5 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** APA style not used and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 10 pts |

    Total Points: 100

    **## Module6.docx**

    **Module 6:** _Descriptive and Inferential Statistics: Identifying Them in Journals_

    **Instructions**

    Distinguish between the organization of articles by evidence level and organization of articles by clinical question (Essay). Please utilize Figure 1 John Hopkins Evidence Based-Practice Model for Nursing and Health Care Professionals.

    Once all the articles considered important to answer the clinical question have been gathered, the DNP should be able organize the articles by level of evidence and type of evidence.

    1. What is the purpose of the article organization?

    2. How do you compare the article organization by type of evidence vs the organization based on the type of clinical question?

    3. What is the best way to organize the studies when the organization is based on the clinical question?

    **Use an Essay Format**

    · You must present your writing double-spaced, in a Times New Roman, Arial or Courier New font, with a font size of 12.

    · Pay attention to grammar rules (spelling and syntax).

    · Your work must be original and must not contain material copied from books or the internet.

    · When citing the work of other authors, include citations and references using APA 7th style to respect their intellectual property and avoid plagiarism.

    · Remember that your writing must have a header or a cover page that includes the name of the institution, the program, the course code, the title of the activity, your name and student number, and the assignment's due date.

    Contribute a minimum of 5 pages. It should include at least 3 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

    Be sure to review the
    [academic expectations](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/1876/pages/expectations-and-best-practices-for-assignments) for your submission.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    · Submit your assignment by 11:59 PM Eastern on the due date.

    · Review the rubric to determine how your assignment will be graded.

    · Your assignment will be run through Turnitin to check for plagiarism.

    ·
    [File Upload](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/44875/assignments/877917)

    ·
    [Studio](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/44875/assignments/877917)

    ·
    [Google Drive](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/44875/assignments/877917)

    ·
    [Office 365](https://agmu.instructure.com/courses/44875/assignments/877917)

    Top of Form

    | | |
    | — | — |
    | Upload a file, or choose a file you've already uploaded. |
    | Drag a file here, or<br>Choose a file to upload |
    | | |
    | |
    | <="" div="" style="margin: 10px 0px;"><br>I agree to the tool's <br>[End-User License Agreement](https://agmu.turnitin.com/integrations/cpf/eula/agmu)<br>This assignment submission is my own, original work<br>* | |
    | |

    Bottom of Form

    Rubric

    **- Official Essay Rubric**

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | – Official Essay Rubric |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent<br>Mastery of the Information | **30 to >27.0 ptsExcellent** The essay content properly aligns with the information requested and reflects student exemplary mastery of the content by showing complete information, details, and examples.<br> <br>**27 to >24.0 ptsGood** The essay content aligns with the information requested and shows good mastery of the content. Provides sufficient information, however missed opportunities to demonstrate supporting details and/or examples.<br> <br>**24 to >21.0 ptsFair** The essay content aligns with the information requested and shows fair mastery of the content. Provides sufficient information, but lacks supporting details and/or examples.<br> <br>**21 to >18.0 ptsPoor** The essay content does not align with the information requested. Does not demonstrate mastery of the concepts.<br> <br>**18 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 30 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization<br>Structure of the Essay | **20 to >18.0 ptsExcellent** The essay has a clear format, an introduction, a body with clear transitions between evidence and supporting arguments, and a conclusion. The information is presented in an orderly manner. All elements facilitate the flow of the information in the document.<br> <br>**18 to >16.0 ptsGood** The essay has a clear format, an introduction, a body with evidence, supporting arguments, and a conclusion. All elements facilitate the flow of the information in the document, but the essay may miss transitions between sections or have other small organization issues.<br> <br>**16 to >14.0 ptsFair** The essay structure is problematic, lacks logical flow, and has at least one of these issues: The essay does not have a clear introduction or conclusion, or the evidence and supporting arguments are not aligned with the requested requirements.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsPoor** The essay does not appear to have any structure: no introduction, progression of thought, or defined conclusion.<br> <br>**12 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 20 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking<br>Development of Ideas | **15 to >14.0 ptsExcellent** Details are considered, and a point of view, thesis statement, or main idea is clear. Next, the essay presents excellent evidence, arguments, and examples to support the point. Finally, the student draws meaningful and high-level insightful conclusions based on the information presented and explained.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsGood (12 -11 pts)** Details are considered, and a point of view, thesis statement, or main idea is clear. Next, the essay presents sufficient evidence, arguments, or examples to support the point. Finally, it draws appropriate conclusions based on the information presented and explained.<br> <br>**12 to >11.0 ptsFair** Details are considered, and a point of view, thesis statement, or main idea is identified. Next, the essay presents some evidence, arguments, or examples, but some are not relevant to support the point. Student draws fair conclusions, but not all are based on or supported by the presented information.<br> <br>**11 to >9.0 ptsPoor** Details are not considered, and a point of view, thesis statement, or main idea is exceptionally vague. The provided evidence, arguments, or examples are disconnected or not relevant. Additionally, the essay lacks a conclusion or repeats previous statements made.<br> <br>**9 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** The assignment did not reflect the requested outcomes, was off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 15 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInformation Literacy<br>Quality of Resources | **15 to >14.0 ptsExcellent** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, up to date (depending on what is acceptable in the field), from credible and trusted sources, and the number of sources meets the requested amount.<br> <br>**14 to >12.0 ptsGood** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 1 source is not a credible and trusted source; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount.<br> <br>**12 to >11.0 ptsFair** Supporting information is pertinent to the topic, however, 2 or more sources are not credible and trusted sources; they may or may not be the most recent (depending on what is acceptable in the field). Additionally, the number of sources meets the requested amount.<br> <br>**11 to >9.0 ptsPoor** The following criteria would apply, supporting information is not pertinent to the topic, none of the sources are from credible or trusted sources, or the number of sources requested was not met.<br> <br>**9 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** Resources did not reflect the requested outcomes, were off-topic, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 15 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting<br>Mechanics and Grammar | **10 to >9.0 ptsExcellent** Excellence in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure.<br> <br>**9 to >8.0 ptsGood** Minimal (1 – 3) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**8 to >7.0 ptsFair** Multiple (4 -7) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**7 to >5.0 ptsPoor** Severe (8 – 10) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.<br> <br>**5 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** Unacceptable (11 or more) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors, and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 10 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormatting and APA Guidelines | **10 to >9.0 ptsExcellent** The essay reflects excellent execution and incorporation of APA guidelines. Correct formatting, setup, title page, perfect in-text citations, and reference formatting.<br> <br>**9 to >8.0 ptsGood** The essay offers correct formatting on the setup, and title page, with minimal formatting or punctuation errors within the in-text citations or references.<br> <br>**8 to >6.0 ptsFair** The essay offers correct formatting, setup, and title page but has significant errors within in-text citations and references.<br> <br>**6 to >5.0 ptsPoor** The essay offers severe incorrect APA formatting, setup or missing title page, and/or problematic in-text citations and references.<br> <br>**5 to >0 ptsUnacceptable** APA style not used and/or the assignment was not submitted. | 10 pts |

    Total Points: 100

  • [Solved] Technology decision making

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Identify the process for decision making regarding technology. Discuss nursing role in identifying appropriate technology for practice. Your post should include the following: 1. One technology application used in health care to facilitate decision making.( Barcode Medication Administration System) …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Identify the process for decision making regarding technology. Discuss nursing role in identifying appropriate technology for practice.

    Your post should include the following:

    1. One technology application used in health care to facilitate decision making.( Barcode Medication Administration System)

    2. The application’s impact on quality of decision making.

    3. The process for selecting and implementing the application.
    4. A risk assessment of the application.
    5. The costs associated with the application.

    6. Nurses’ role(s) in selecting and evaluating the application.

    **Submission Instructions:**

    – post should be formatted per the current APA and 4-5 pages in length, excluding the title and references page.
    – Incorporate citations from the textbook Nelson, R., & Staggers, N. (2014). Health informatics: An interprofessional approach St. Louis, MO: Mosby. ISBN: 9780323402316
    – And a minimum of 5 current (published within the last five years) _scholarly journal articles_ or _primary legal sources_ (statutes, court opinions) within your work.

  • [Solved] Nursing Homework

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Nursing Homework.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] political science

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering political science.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] Discussion help

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    You will **write a letter from the perspective of one of the characters or villain in your favorite horror film, show, novel, story, or video game.** The letter can be addressed to another character in the film, a loved one, the audience, an unknown reader, or even a diary. **Your letter should cont…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    You will **write a letter from the perspective of one of the characters or villain in your favorite horror film, show, novel, story, or video game.** The letter can be addressed to another character in the film, a loved one, the audience, an unknown reader, or even a diary.

    **Your letter should contain the following:**

    – **Capture the character’s personality, fears, and emotions** – Think about their **state of mind** at the time of writing. Are they terrified, guilty, angry, or desperate?

    – **Reference major events from the text** – Include specific details about what they have experienced. How do they feel about what happened?

    – **Maintain a consistent and believable voice** – The letter should sound like it was truly written by the character, using language that fits their personality and background.

    #### **Guiding Questions to Help You Get Started:**

    – **What moment in the text is your character writing from?** Before or after a major event? Are they still in danger?
    – **Who are they writing to, and why?** Are they warning someone? Seeking help? Confessing something? Reflecting on their trauma?
    – **What emotions are driving them to write?** Fear, regret, revenge, hopelessness?
    – **How has the horror affected them?** Do they feel haunted, paranoid, or resigned to their fate?

    Follow MLA guidelines and provide a works cited page. This assignment will be 500-650 words.

    (Any notes on a separate file about what you'll be writing about so I can understand the assignment would be appreciated)

    – 6.78