Executive Solution Overview
PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW ALL INSTRUCTIONS! Including Grading Rubric Read [DSM-5-TR](https://dsm.psychiatryonline.org/doi/book/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425787) **files (9)** – ## AVisualGuidetoCannabisQuantities.docx – ## VIDEOS.docx – ## Instructions-AddictionsCaseStudyPart2DiagnosticImpressionsAssig…
Instant Solution Download
$6.99Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.
Need a Fresh Custom Paper?
Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.
Order on TutorsGallery →Assignment Prompt & Instructions
PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW ALL INSTRUCTIONS!
Including Grading Rubric
Read [DSM-5-TR](https://dsm.psychiatryonline.org/doi/book/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425787)
**files (9)**
– ## AVisualGuidetoCannabisQuantities.docx
– ## VIDEOS.docx
– ## Instructions-AddictionsCaseStudyPart2DiagnosticImpressionsAssign.docx
– ## GradingRubric-AddictionsCaseStudy-Part2DiagnosticImpressions.pdf
– AddictionsCaseStudyNarrative1.docx
– Read-MillerRollnickChapter10.pdf
– Read-HartKsirChapters11.docx
– Read-MillerRollnickChapter9.pdf
– Read-HartKsirChapters10.docx
**## AVisualGuidetoCannabisQuantities.docx**
## image1.png
**## VIDEOS.docx**
**VIDEOS**
[https://youtu.be/OLCPW5XC5pc?si=NSLT47daoZ59jltU](https://youtu.be/OLCPW5XC5pc?si=NSLT47daoZ59jltU)
[https://youtu.be/cHEOsKddURQ?si=_viKcIZ3swrTOWXH](https://youtu.be/cHEOsKddURQ?si=_viKcIZ3swrTOWXH)
**## Instructions-AddictionsCaseStudyPart2DiagnosticImpressionsAssign.docx**
EDCO 740
**Addictions Case Study: Part 2 – Diagnostic Impressions**
**Assignment Instructions**
**Overview**
The
**Addictions Case Study Assignment** is designed to help you make application of course content to a potential counseling situation. The assignment will be divided up into three parts:
**Addictions Case Study: Part 1 – Case Conceptualization Assignment, Addictions Case Study: Part 2 – Diagnostic Impressions Assignment,** and
**Addictions Case Study: Part 3 – Treatment Plan Assignment.**
**General Paper Instructions**
The general requirements for the paper are:
· A medium-length paper (about a 7- to 9-page summary, not including the title and references pages –
no abstract is needed).
· This is to be formatted in the most current APA style.
· For this assignment, you are only required to use
one source: the DSM-5-TR (however, you can add more if desired).
**Assignment Specific Instructions**
For
**Addictions Case Study: Part 2 – Diagnostic Impressions Assignment**, again using the
**Addictions Case Study: Narrative**, take what you wrote in Part 1 and from the narrative, then document your diagnostic impressions of the client. In your write-up,
using the DSM-5-TR, you will need to answer (each bullet is about a paragraph – review the rubric for more detail):
· What is the
_primary_ diagnosis for this client? Put your full diagnosis in
**bold** and
list the criteria the client meets from the DSM with supporting statements from Marci’s narrative.
· What is the prevalence rate, any culture and/or gender-related diagnostic issues, functional consequences, and comorbidity for this particular diagnosis?
· What are the differential diagnoses to be aware of for this client (choose
only one/those that THIS client could be dealing with, not all that the DSM may show)?
· What are any
_secondary_ and
_tertiary_ diagnoses for this client? Put your full diagnosis in
**bold** and
list the criteria the client meets from the DSM with supporting statements from Marci’s narrative.
· What is the prevalence rate, any culture and/or gender-related diagnostic issues, functional consequences, and comorbidity for this particular diagnosis?
· What are the differential diagnoses to be aware of for this client (choose
only one/those that THIS client could be dealing with, not all that the DSM may show)?
Note that each diagnosis you give needs to have the ICD-10 code written in this order:
**F-code number** (without the parentheses), the
**name of the diagnosis**, the
**severity**, and any appropriate
**specifiers**(if required).
Divide your paper as follows (showing
each heading below as level 1 or level 2, starting on p. 2 –
no abstract is needed):
**Title of Paper**
**Primary Diagnostic Impression**
**Primary Diagnosis – Listing of Criteria Met**
**Prevalence, Culture/Gender Issues, Functional Consequences, Comorbidity**
**Possible Differential Diagnoses**
**Secondary Diagnostic Impressions**
**Secondary Diagnosis 1 – Listing of Criteria Met**
**Prevalence, Culture/Gender Issues, Functional Consequences, Comorbidity**
**Possible Differential Diagnoses**
**Secondary Diagnosis 2 – Listing of Criteria Met**
**Prevalence, Culture/Gender Issues, Functional Consequences, Comorbidity**
**Possible Differential Diagnoses**
_(continue on in the same manner for additional secondary/tertiary diagnoses you find)_
**References**
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
Page 2 of 2
**## GradingRubric-AddictionsCaseStudy-Part2DiagnosticImpressions.pdf**
Criteria Ratings Points
Primary
Diagnostic
Impression
30 to >27 pts
Advanced
All pertinent criteria
met shown.
Summary of the
Prevalence and
Functional
Consequences
shown.
Comorbidity
shown. Culture-
and
Gender-related
diagnostic issues
shown.
Differential
diagnoses related
to the diagnosis
shown.
27 to >24 pts
Proficient
All pertinent
criteria met shown.
Summary of the
Prevalence and
Functional
Consequences
mostly shown.
Comorbidity
mostly shown.
Culture- and
Gender-related
diagnostic issues
mostly shown.
Differential
diagnoses related
to the diagnosis
shown.
24 to >21 pts
Developing
Most pertinent
criteria met shown.
Summary of the
Prevalence and
Functional
Consequences
barely or not
shown.
Comorbidity barely
or not shown.
Culture- and
Gender-related
diagnostic issues
barely or not
shown.
Differential
diagnoses related
to the diagnosis
barely or not
shown.
21 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Pertinent criteria
met barely or not
shown. Summary
of the Prevalence
and Functional
Consequences
barely or not
shown. Comorbidity
barely or not
shown. Culture- and
Gender-related
diagnostic issues
barely or not
shown. Differential
diagnoses related
to the diagnosis
barely or not
shown.
0 pts
Not
Present
30 pts
Main
Secondary
Diagnostic
Impresson
30 to >27 pts
Advanced
All pertinent criteria
met shown.
Summary of the
Prevalence and
Functional
Consequences
shown.
Comorbidity
shown. Culture-
and
Gender-related
diagnostic issues
shown.
Differential
diagnoses related
to the diagnosis
shown.
27 to >24 pts
Proficient
All pertinent
criteria met shown.
Summary of the
Prevalence and
Functional
Consequences
mostly shown.
Comorbidity
mostly shown.
Culture- and
Gender-related
diagnostic issues
mostly shown.
Differential
diagnoses related
to the diagnosis
shown.
24 to >21 pts
Developing
Most pertinent
criteria met shown.
Summary of the
Prevalence and
Functional
Consequences
barely or not
shown.
Comorbidity barely
or not shown.
Culture- and
Gender-related
diagnostic issues
barely or not
shown.
Differential
diagnoses related
to the diagnosis
barely or not
shown.
21 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Pertinent criteria
met barely or not
shown. Summary
of the Prevalence
and Functional
Consequences
barely or not
shown. Comorbidity
barely or not
shown. Culture- and
Gender-related
diagnostic issues
barely or not
shown. Differential
diagnoses related
to the diagnosis
barely or not
shown.
0 pts
Not
Present
30 pts
Addictions Case Study: Part 2 – Diagnostic Impressions Grading
Rubric | EDCO740_B02_202620
Criteria Ratings Points
Additional
Secondary
Diagnostic
Impressions
10 to >9 pts
Advanced
All pertinent criteria
met shown.
Summary of the
Prevalence and
Functional
Consequences
shown.
Comorbidity
shown. Culture-
and
Gender-related
diagnostic issues
shown.
Differential
diagnoses related
to the diagnosis
shown.
9 to >7 pts
Proficient
All pertinent
criteria met shown.
Summary of the
Prevalence and
Functional
Consequences
mostly shown.
Comorbidity
mostly shown.
Culture- and
Gender-related
diagnostic issues
mostly shown.
Differential
diagnoses related
to the diagnosis
shown.
7 to >6 pts
Developing
Most pertinent
criteria met shown.
Summary of the
Prevalence and
Functional
Consequences
barely or not
shown.
Comorbidity barely
or not shown.
Culture- and
Gender-related
diagnostic issues
barely or not
shown.
Differential
diagnoses related
to the diagnosis
barely or not
shown.
6 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Pertinent criteria
met barely or not
shown. Summary
of the Prevalence
and Functional
Consequences
barely or not
shown. Comorbidity
barely or not
shown. Culture- and
Gender-related
diagnostic issues
barely or not
shown. Differential
diagnoses related
to the diagnosis
barely or not
shown.
0 pts
Not
Present
10 pts
Organization 10 to >9 pts
Advanced
All required
elements are
included and
presented with
strong headings
and organizational
clarity. There are
clear transitions
between
paragraphs and
sections. The
treatment of the
topic is logically
oriented. The
paper is 7-9 pages
in length, not
including the title
and reference
pages.
9 to >7 pts
Proficient
All required
elements are
included and
organized. There
are transitions
between
paragraphs and
sections. The
treatment of the
topic is logically
oriented. The
paper meets the
page length
requirement of 7-9
pages (not
including the title
and reference
pages) or comes
very close.
7 to >6 pts
Developing
Most required
elements are
included and are
mostly organized.
Most paragraphs
and sections have
transitions. The
logical treatment of
the topic needs
improvement. The
paper may not
meet the page
length requirement.
6 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Few or no required
elements are
included. Few or no
transitions exist
between
paragraphs and
sections. There
may not be a logical
treatment of the
topic. The paper
does not meet the
page length
requirement.
0 pts
Not
Present
10 pts
Addictions Case Study: Part 2 – Diagnostic Impressions Grading
Rubric | EDCO740_B02_202620
Criteria Ratings Points
Style 10 to >9 pts
Advanced
The paper properly
uses current APA
style. Proper
headings, in-text
citations, and
references are
formatted correctly.
The paper reflects
a graduate level
voice and
vocabulary. There
are very few
spelling and
grammar errors.
9 to >7 pts
Proficient
The paper
consistently uses
current APA style
with few or no
exceptions. Proper
headings, in-text
citations, and
references are
formatted with few
or no errors. The
paper reflects a
graduate level
voice and
vocabulary. There
are few spelling
and grammar
errors.
7 to >6 pts
Developing
The paper
inconsistently uses
current APA style.
Headings, in-text
citations, and
references are
inconsistently
formatted. The
paper does not
consistently reflect
a graduate level
voice and
vocabulary. There
are spelling and
grammar errors.
6 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
The paper
erroneously uses or
does not use
current APA style.
Headings, in-text
citations, and
references are
erroneously
formatted or not
present. The paper
does not reflect a
graduate level voice
and vocabulary.
There are spelling
and grammar
errors.
0 pts
Not
Present
10 pts
Sources 10 to >9 pts
Advanced
The Reference
page meets or
exceeds the
required number of
sources (a
minimum of 1
scholarly source:
the DSM 5-TR).
The DSM-5-TR is
referenced
throughout the
paper.
9 to >7 pts
Proficient
The Reference
page meets the
required number of
sources (1
scholarly source:
the DSM-5-TR).
The DSM-5-TR is
referenced
throughout the
paper.
7 to >6 pts
Developing
The Reference
page does not
meet the required
number of sources.
The DSM-5-TR is
not referenced
throughout the
paper.
6 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
The Reference
page is not present
or contains few
sources. The
DSM-5-TR is not
referenced
throughout the
paper.
0 pts
Not
Present
10 pts
Total Points: 100
Addictions Case Study: Part 2 – Diagnostic Impressions Grading
Rubric | EDCO740_B02_202620
**AddictionsCaseStudyNarrative1.docx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/addictionscasestudynarrative1-docx)
**Read-MillerRollnickChapter10.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/read-millerrollnickchapter10-pdf)
**Read-HartKsirChapters11.docx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/read-hartksirchapters11-docx)
**Read-MillerRollnickChapter9.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/read-millerrollnickchapter9-pdf)
**Read-HartKsirChapters10.docx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/read-hartksirchapters10-docx)
**Read-HartKsirChapters10.docx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/read-hartksirchapters10-docx)
**## AVisualGuidetoCannabisQuantities.docx**
## image1.png
**## VIDEOS.docx**
**VIDEOS**
[https://youtu.be/OLCPW5XC5pc?si=NSLT47daoZ59jltU](https://youtu.be/OLCPW5XC5pc?si=NSLT47daoZ59jltU)
[https://youtu.be/cHEOsKddURQ?si=_viKcIZ3swrTOWXH](https://youtu.be/cHEOsKddURQ?si=_viKcIZ3swrTOWXH)
**## Instructions-AddictionsCaseStudyPart2DiagnosticImpressionsAssign.docx**
EDCO 740
**Addictions Case Study: Part 2 – Diagnostic Impressions**
**Assignment Instructions**
**Overview**
The
**Addictions Case Study Assignment** is designed to help you make application of course content to a potential counseling situation. The assignment will be divided up into three parts:
**Addictions Case Study: Part 1 – Case Conceptualization Assignment, Addictions Case Study: Part 2 – Diagnostic Impressions Assignment,** and
**Addictions Case Study: Part 3 – Treatment Plan Assignment.**
**General Paper Instructions**
The general requirements for the paper are:
· A medium-length paper (about a 7- to 9-page summary, not including the title and references pages –
no abstract is needed).
· This is to be formatted in the most current APA style.
· For this assignment, you are only required to use
one source: the DSM-5-TR (however, you can add more if desired).
**Assignment Specific Instructions**
For
**Addictions Case Study: Part 2 – Diagnostic Impressions Assignment**, again using the
**Addictions Case Study: Narrative**, take what you wrote in Part 1 and from the narrative, then document your diagnostic impressions of the client. In your write-up,
using the DSM-5-TR, you will need to answer (each bullet is about a paragraph – review the rubric for more detail):
· What is the
_primary_ diagnosis for this client? Put your full diagnosis in
**bold** and
list the criteria the client meets from the DSM with supporting statements from Marci’s narrative.
· What is the prevalence rate, any culture and/or gender-related diagnostic issues, functional consequences, and comorbidity for this particular diagnosis?
· What are the differential diagnoses to be aware of for this client (choose
only one/those that THIS client could be dealing with, not all that the DSM may show)?
· What are any
_secondary_ and
_tertiary_ diagnoses for this client? Put your full diagnosis in
**bold** and
list the criteria the client meets from the DSM with supporting statements from Marci’s narrative.
· What is the prevalence rate, any culture and/or gender-related diagnostic issues, functional consequences, and comorbidity for this particular diagnosis?
· What are the differential diagnoses to be aware of for this client (choose
only one/those that THIS client could be dealing with, not all that the DSM may show)?
Note that each diagnosis you give needs to have the ICD-10 code written in this order:
**F-code number** (without the parentheses), the
**name of the diagnosis**, the
**severity**, and any appropriate
**specifiers**(if required).
Divide your paper as follows (showing
each heading below as level 1 or level 2, starting on p. 2 –
no abstract is needed):
**Title of Paper**
**Primary Diagnostic Impression**
**Primary Diagnosis – Listing of Criteria Met**
**Prevalence, Culture/Gender Issues, Functional Consequences, Comorbidity**
**Possible Differential Diagnoses**
**Secondary Diagnostic Impressions**
**Secondary Diagnosis 1 – Listing of Criteria Met**
**Prevalence, Culture/Gender Issues, Functional Consequences, Comorbidity**
**Possible Differential Diagnoses**
**Secondary Diagnosis 2 – Listing of Criteria Met**
**Prevalence, Culture/Gender Issues, Functional Consequences, Comorbidity**
**Possible Differential Diagnoses**
_(continue on in the same manner for additional secondary/tertiary diagnoses you find)_
**References**
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
Page 2 of 2
**## GradingRubric-AddictionsCaseStudy-Part2DiagnosticImpressions.pdf**
Criteria Ratings Points
Primary
Diagnostic
Impression
30 to >27 pts
Advanced
All pertinent criteria
met shown.
Summary of the
Prevalence and
Functional
Consequences
shown.
Comorbidity
shown. Culture-
and
Gender-related
diagnostic issues
shown.
Differential
diagnoses related
to the diagnosis
shown.
27 to >24 pts
Proficient
All pertinent
criteria met shown.
Summary of the
Prevalence and
Functional
Consequences
mostly shown.
Comorbidity
mostly shown.
Culture- and
Gender-related
diagnostic issues
mostly shown.
Differential
diagnoses related
to the diagnosis
shown.
24 to >21 pts
Developing
Most pertinent
criteria met shown.
Summary of the
Prevalence and
Functional
Consequences
barely or not
shown.
Comorbidity barely
or not shown.
Culture- and
Gender-related
diagnostic issues
barely or not
shown.
Differential
diagnoses related
to the diagnosis
barely or not
shown.
21 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Pertinent criteria
met barely or not
shown. Summary
of the Prevalence
and Functional
Consequences
barely or not
shown. Comorbidity
barely or not
shown. Culture- and
Gender-related
diagnostic issues
barely or not
shown. Differential
diagnoses related
to the diagnosis
barely or not
shown.
0 pts
Not
Present
30 pts
Main
Secondary
Diagnostic
Impresson
30 to >27 pts
Advanced
All pertinent criteria
met shown.
Summary of the
Prevalence and
Functional
Consequences
shown.
Comorbidity
shown. Culture-
and
Gender-related
diagnostic issues
shown.
Differential
diagnoses related
to the diagnosis
shown.
27 to >24 pts
Proficient
All pertinent
criteria met shown.
Summary of the
Prevalence and
Functional
Consequences
mostly shown.
Comorbidity
mostly shown.
Culture- and
Gender-related
diagnostic issues
mostly shown.
Differential
diagnoses related
to the diagnosis
shown.
24 to >21 pts
Developing
Most pertinent
criteria met shown.
Summary of the
Prevalence and
Functional
Consequences
barely or not
shown.
Comorbidity barely
or not shown.
Culture- and
Gender-related
diagnostic issues
barely or not
shown.
Differential
diagnoses related
to the diagnosis
barely or not
shown.
21 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Pertinent criteria
met barely or not
shown. Summary
of the Prevalence
and Functional
Consequences
barely or not
shown. Comorbidity
barely or not
shown. Culture- and
Gender-related
diagnostic issues
barely or not
shown. Differential
diagnoses related
to the diagnosis
barely or not
shown.
0 pts
Not
Present
30 pts
Addictions Case Study: Part 2 – Diagnostic Impressions Grading
Rubric | EDCO740_B02_202620
Criteria Ratings Points
Additional
Secondary
Diagnostic
Impressions
10 to >9 pts
Advanced
All pertinent criteria
met shown.
Summary of the
Prevalence and
Functional
Consequences
shown.
Comorbidity
shown. Culture-
and
Gender-related
diagnostic issues
shown.
Differential
diagnoses related
to the diagnosis
shown.
9 to >7 pts
Proficient
All pertinent
criteria met shown.
Summary of the
Prevalence and
Functional
Consequences
mostly shown.
Comorbidity
mostly shown.
Culture- and
Gender-related
diagnostic issues
mostly shown.
Differential
diagnoses related
to the diagnosis
shown.
7 to >6 pts
Developing
Most pertinent
criteria met shown.
Summary of the
Prevalence and
Functional
Consequences
barely or not
shown.
Comorbidity barely
or not shown.
Culture- and
Gender-related
diagnostic issues
barely or not
shown.
Differential
diagnoses related
to the diagnosis
barely or not
shown.
6 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Pertinent criteria
met barely or not
shown. Summary
of the Prevalence
and Functional
Consequences
barely or not
shown. Comorbidity
barely or not
shown. Culture- and
Gender-related
diagnostic issues
barely or not
shown. Differential
diagnoses related
to the diagnosis
barely or not
shown.
0 pts
Not
Present
10 pts
Organization 10 to >9 pts
Advanced
All required
elements are
included and
presented with
strong headings
and organizational
clarity. There are
clear transitions
between
paragraphs and
sections. The
treatment of the
topic is logically
oriented. The
paper is 7-9 pages
in length, not
including the title
and reference
pages.
9 to >7 pts
Proficient
All required
elements are
included and
organized. There
are transitions
between
paragraphs and
sections. The
treatment of the
topic is logically
oriented. The
paper meets the
page length
requirement of 7-9
pages (not
including the title
and reference
pages) or comes
very close.
7 to >6 pts
Developing
Most required
elements are
included and are
mostly organized.
Most paragraphs
and sections have
transitions. The
logical treatment of
the topic needs
improvement. The
paper may not
meet the page
length requirement.
6 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Few or no required
elements are
included. Few or no
transitions exist
between
paragraphs and
sections. There
may not be a logical
treatment of the
topic. The paper
does not meet the
page length
requirement.
0 pts
Not
Present
10 pts
Addictions Case Study: Part 2 – Diagnostic Impressions Grading
Rubric | EDCO740_B02_202620
Criteria Ratings Points
Style 10 to >9 pts
Advanced
The paper properly
uses current APA
style. Proper
headings, in-text
citations, and
references are
formatted correctly.
The paper reflects
a graduate level
voice and
vocabulary. There
are very few
spelling and
grammar errors.
9 to >7 pts
Proficient
The paper
consistently uses
current APA style
with few or no
exceptions. Proper
headings, in-text
citations, and
references are
formatted with few
or no errors. The
paper reflects a
graduate level
voice and
vocabulary. There
are few spelling
and grammar
errors.
7 to >6 pts
Developing
The paper
inconsistently uses
current APA style.
Headings, in-text
citations, and
references are
inconsistently
formatted. The
paper does not
consistently reflect
a graduate level
voice and
vocabulary. There
are spelling and
grammar errors.
6 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
The paper
erroneously uses or
does not use
current APA style.
Headings, in-text
citations, and
references are
erroneously
formatted or not
present. The paper
does not reflect a
graduate level voice
and vocabulary.
There are spelling
and grammar
errors.
0 pts
Not
Present
10 pts
Sources 10 to >9 pts
Advanced
The Reference
page meets or
exceeds the
required number of
sources (a
minimum of 1
scholarly source:
the DSM 5-TR).
The DSM-5-TR is
referenced
throughout the
paper.
9 to >7 pts
Proficient
The Reference
page meets the
required number of
sources (1
scholarly source:
the DSM-5-TR).
The DSM-5-TR is
referenced
throughout the
paper.
7 to >6 pts
Developing
The Reference
page does not
meet the required
number of sources.
The DSM-5-TR is
not referenced
throughout the
paper.
6 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
The Reference
page is not present
or contains few
sources. The
DSM-5-TR is not
referenced
throughout the
paper.
0 pts
Not
Present
10 pts
Total Points: 100
Addictions Case Study: Part 2 – Diagnostic Impressions Grading
Rubric | EDCO740_B02_202620
**AddictionsCaseStudyNarrative1.docx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/addictionscasestudynarrative1-docx)
**Read-MillerRollnickChapter10.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/read-millerrollnickchapter10-pdf)
**Read-HartKsirChapters11.docx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/read-hartksirchapters11-docx)
**Read-MillerRollnickChapter9.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/read-millerrollnickchapter9-pdf)
**Read-HartKsirChapters10.docx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/read-hartksirchapters10-docx)
**## AVisualGuidetoCannabisQuantities.docx**
## image1.png
**## VIDEOS.docx**
**VIDEOS**
[https://youtu.be/OLCPW5XC5pc?si=NSLT47daoZ59jltU](https://youtu.be/OLCPW5XC5pc?si=NSLT47daoZ59jltU)
[https://youtu.be/cHEOsKddURQ?si=_viKcIZ3swrTOWXH](https://youtu.be/cHEOsKddURQ?si=_viKcIZ3swrTOWXH)
**## Instructions-AddictionsCaseStudyPart2DiagnosticImpressionsAssign.docx**
EDCO 740
**Addictions Case Study: Part 2 – Diagnostic Impressions**
**Assignment Instructions**
**Overview**
The
**Addictions Case Study Assignment** is designed to help you make application of course content to a potential counseling situation. The assignment will be divided up into three parts:
**Addictions Case Study: Part 1 – Case Conceptualization Assignment, Addictions Case Study: Part 2 – Diagnostic Impressions Assignment,** and
**Addictions Case Study: Part 3 – Treatment Plan Assignment.**
**General Paper Instructions**
The general requirements for the paper are:
· A medium-length paper (about a 7- to 9-page summary, not including the title and references pages –
no abstract is needed).
· This is to be formatted in the most current APA style.
· For this assignment, you are only required to use
one source: the DSM-5-TR (however, you can add more if desired).
**Assignment Specific Instructions**
For
**Addictions Case Study: Part 2 – Diagnostic Impressions Assignment**, again using the
**Addictions Case Study: Narrative**, take what you wrote in Part 1 and from the narrative, then document your diagnostic impressions of the client. In your write-up,
using the DSM-5-TR, you will need to answer (each bullet is about a paragraph – review the rubric for more detail):
· What is the
_primary_ diagnosis for this client? Put your full diagnosis in
**bold** and
list the criteria the client meets from the DSM with supporting statements from Marci’s narrative.
· What is the prevalence rate, any culture and/or gender-related diagnostic issues, functional consequences, and comorbidity for this particular diagnosis?
· What are the differential diagnoses to be aware of for this client (choose
only one/those that THIS client could be dealing with, not all that the DSM may show)?
· What are any
_secondary_ and
_tertiary_ diagnoses for this client? Put your full diagnosis in
**bold** and
list the criteria the client meets from the DSM with supporting statements from Marci’s narrative.
· What is the prevalence rate, any culture and/or gender-related diagnostic issues, functional consequences, and comorbidity for this particular diagnosis?
· What are the differential diagnoses to be aware of for this client (choose
only one/those that THIS client could be dealing with, not all that the DSM may show)?
Note that each diagnosis you give needs to have the ICD-10 code written in this order:
**F-code number** (without the parentheses), the
**name of the diagnosis**, the
**severity**, and any appropriate
**specifiers**(if required).
Divide your paper as follows (showing
each heading below as level 1 or level 2, starting on p. 2 –
no abstract is needed):
**Title of Paper**
**Primary Diagnostic Impression**
**Primary Diagnosis – Listing of Criteria Met**
**Prevalence, Culture/Gender Issues, Functional Consequences, Comorbidity**
**Possible Differential Diagnoses**
**Secondary Diagnostic Impressions**
**Secondary Diagnosis 1 – Listing of Criteria Met**
**Prevalence, Culture/Gender Issues, Functional Consequences, Comorbidity**
**Possible Differential Diagnoses**
**Secondary Diagnosis 2 – Listing of Criteria Met**
**Prevalence, Culture/Gender Issues, Functional Consequences, Comorbidity**
**Possible Differential Diagnoses**
_(continue on in the same manner for additional secondary/tertiary diagnoses you find)_
**References**
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
Page 2 of 2
**## GradingRubric-AddictionsCaseStudy-Part2DiagnosticImpressions.pdf**
Criteria Ratings Points
Primary
Diagnostic
Impression
30 to >27 pts
Advanced
All pertinent criteria
met shown.
Summary of the
Prevalence and
Functional
Consequences
shown.
Comorbidity
shown. Culture-
and
Gender-related
diagnostic issues
shown.
Differential
diagnoses related
to the diagnosis
shown.
27 to >24 pts
Proficient
All pertinent
criteria met shown.
Summary of the
Prevalence and
Functional
Consequences
mostly shown.
Comorbidity
mostly shown.
Culture- and
Gender-related
diagnostic issues
mostly shown.
Differential
diagnoses related
to the diagnosis
shown.
24 to >21 pts
Developing
Most pertinent
criteria met shown.
Summary of the
Prevalence and
Functional
Consequences
barely or not
shown.
Comorbidity barely
or not shown.
Culture- and
Gender-related
diagnostic issues
barely or not
shown.
Differential
diagnoses related
to the diagnosis
barely or not
shown.
21 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Pertinent criteria
met barely or not
shown. Summary
of the Prevalence
and Functional
Consequences
barely or not
shown. Comorbidity
barely or not
shown. Culture- and
Gender-related
diagnostic issues
barely or not
shown. Differential
diagnoses related
to the diagnosis
barely or not
shown.
0 pts
Not
Present
30 pts
Main
Secondary
Diagnostic
Impresson
30 to >27 pts
Advanced
All pertinent criteria
met shown.
Summary of the
Prevalence and
Functional
Consequences
shown.
Comorbidity
shown. Culture-
and
Gender-related
diagnostic issues
shown.
Differential
diagnoses related
to the diagnosis
shown.
27 to >24 pts
Proficient
All pertinent
criteria met shown.
Summary of the
Prevalence and
Functional
Consequences
mostly shown.
Comorbidity
mostly shown.
Culture- and
Gender-related
diagnostic issues
mostly shown.
Differential
diagnoses related
to the diagnosis
shown.
24 to >21 pts
Developing
Most pertinent
criteria met shown.
Summary of the
Prevalence and
Functional
Consequences
barely or not
shown.
Comorbidity barely
or not shown.
Culture- and
Gender-related
diagnostic issues
barely or not
shown.
Differential
diagnoses related
to the diagnosis
barely or not
shown.
21 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Pertinent criteria
met barely or not
shown. Summary
of the Prevalence
and Functional
Consequences
barely or not
shown. Comorbidity
barely or not
shown. Culture- and
Gender-related
diagnostic issues
barely or not
shown. Differential
diagnoses related
to the diagnosis
barely or not
shown.
0 pts
Not
Present
30 pts
Addictions Case Study: Part 2 – Diagnostic Impressions Grading
Rubric | EDCO740_B02_202620
Criteria Ratings Points
Additional
Secondary
Diagnostic
Impressions
10 to >9 pts
Advanced
All pertinent criteria
met shown.
Summary of the
Prevalence and
Functional
Consequences
shown.
Comorbidity
shown. Culture-
and
Gender-related
diagnostic issues
shown.
Differential
diagnoses related
to the diagnosis
shown.
9 to >7 pts
Proficient
All pertinent
criteria met shown.
Summary of the
Prevalence and
Functional
Consequences
mostly shown.
Comorbidity
mostly shown.
Culture- and
Gender-related
diagnostic issues
mostly shown.
Differential
diagnoses related
to the diagnosis
shown.
7 to >6 pts
Developing
Most pertinent
criteria met shown.
Summary of the
Prevalence and
Functional
Consequences
barely or not
shown.
Comorbidity barely
or not shown.
Culture- and
Gender-related
diagnostic issues
barely or not
shown.
Differential
diagnoses related
to the diagnosis
barely or not
shown.
6 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Pertinent criteria
met barely or not
shown. Summary
of the Prevalence
and Functional
Consequences
barely or not
shown. Comorbidity
barely or not
shown. Culture- and
Gender-related
diagnostic issues
barely or not
shown. Differential
diagnoses related
to the diagnosis
barely or not
shown.
0 pts
Not
Present
10 pts
Organization 10 to >9 pts
Advanced
All required
elements are
included and
presented with
strong headings
and organizational
clarity. There are
clear transitions
between
paragraphs and
sections. The
treatment of the
topic is logically
oriented. The
paper is 7-9 pages
in length, not
including the title
and reference
pages.
9 to >7 pts
Proficient
All required
elements are
included and
organized. There
are transitions
between
paragraphs and
sections. The
treatment of the
topic is logically
oriented. The
paper meets the
page length
requirement of 7-9
pages (not
including the title
and reference
pages) or comes
very close.
7 to >6 pts
Developing
Most required
elements are
included and are
mostly organized.
Most paragraphs
and sections have
transitions. The
logical treatment of
the topic needs
improvement. The
paper may not
meet the page
length requirement.
6 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
Few or no required
elements are
included. Few or no
transitions exist
between
paragraphs and
sections. There
may not be a logical
treatment of the
topic. The paper
does not meet the
page length
requirement.
0 pts
Not
Present
10 pts
Addictions Case Study: Part 2 – Diagnostic Impressions Grading
Rubric | EDCO740_B02_202620
Criteria Ratings Points
Style 10 to >9 pts
Advanced
The paper properly
uses current APA
style. Proper
headings, in-text
citations, and
references are
formatted correctly.
The paper reflects
a graduate level
voice and
vocabulary. There
are very few
spelling and
grammar errors.
9 to >7 pts
Proficient
The paper
consistently uses
current APA style
with few or no
exceptions. Proper
headings, in-text
citations, and
references are
formatted with few
or no errors. The
paper reflects a
graduate level
voice and
vocabulary. There
are few spelling
and grammar
errors.
7 to >6 pts
Developing
The paper
inconsistently uses
current APA style.
Headings, in-text
citations, and
references are
inconsistently
formatted. The
paper does not
consistently reflect
a graduate level
voice and
vocabulary. There
are spelling and
grammar errors.
6 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
The paper
erroneously uses or
does not use
current APA style.
Headings, in-text
citations, and
references are
erroneously
formatted or not
present. The paper
does not reflect a
graduate level voice
and vocabulary.
There are spelling
and grammar
errors.
0 pts
Not
Present
10 pts
Sources 10 to >9 pts
Advanced
The Reference
page meets or
exceeds the
required number of
sources (a
minimum of 1
scholarly source:
the DSM 5-TR).
The DSM-5-TR is
referenced
throughout the
paper.
9 to >7 pts
Proficient
The Reference
page meets the
required number of
sources (1
scholarly source:
the DSM-5-TR).
The DSM-5-TR is
referenced
throughout the
paper.
7 to >6 pts
Developing
The Reference
page does not
meet the required
number of sources.
The DSM-5-TR is
not referenced
throughout the
paper.
6 to >0 pts
Below Expectations
The Reference
page is not present
or contains few
sources. The
DSM-5-TR is not
referenced
throughout the
paper.
0 pts
Not
Present
10 pts
Total Points: 100
Addictions Case Study: Part 2 – Diagnostic Impressions Grading
Rubric | EDCO740_B02_202620
**AddictionsCaseStudyNarrative1.docx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/addictionscasestudynarrative1-docx)
**Read-MillerRollnickChapter10.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/read-millerrollnickchapter10-pdf)
**Read-HartKsirChapters11.docx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/read-hartksirchapters11-docx)
**Read-MillerRollnickChapter9.pdf**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/read-millerrollnickchapter9-pdf)
**Read-HartKsirChapters10.docx**
This file is too large to display. [View in new window](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/read-hartksirchapters10-docx)
Leave a Reply