Author: admin

Use a paper
that you have written for this exercise.
a. Examine
the paper. What is the purpose and the audience?
b. Outline
the ideas explained in the paper.
c. Revise
your outline to clarify your ideas.

Write a
letter to a neighbor discussing the highlights of the past season in your life.
a. What is
the audience and, consequently, the tone?
b. Rewrite
the letter to a government official. In the rewritten letter, express
dissatisfaction with a service that is supposed to be provided by the local
government and was not provided adequately during the past season. For example,
in the letter to your neighbor, you write about the great snowfall during the
winter. In the rewritten letter to a government official, you write about the
great snowfall, but also include how the locality failed to plow sufficiently.
What is the purpose and audience of the letter to the government official?

Use a
document that you need to draft for this exercise. Access the Purdue University
Online Writing Lab site at http://owl.english.purdue.edu. Search for materials
concerning “prewriting,” which will provide ideas on how to plan and outline
your draft. This site will help you get started writing and give you points to
consider.
a. What is
the purpose of the document that you are writing?
b. How do
you plan on achieving this purpose?
c. List all
of your relevant ideas.
d. Summarize
your overall idea.
e. Make an
outline.
f. Write a
first draft.

The
personnel manager did all of the hiring and firing of the restaurant and golf
course and the part-time accountant manages all bookkeeping and tax work for
the restaurant and golf course.
Candy Graham
who did not have an employment contract was, despite her freedom to set her own
hours and work from her own home, also an employee.

Which is the
best sentence? Why?
a. A
modification to the contract occurred on January 28, 2014.
b. There was
a modification of the contract January 28, 2014.
c. Harry and
Morgan modified their contract on January 28, 2014.

At
approximately 7:30 P.M. on May 4, 2013, the plaintiff, Lidia Gregory, was
weeding the front garden at her home at 2088 Vista Drive in Phoenix. She was
about five feet from the street. The children also were playing in the front
yard which was near the street.

Two businesses
are owned by Max and Sam Maine and they are being sued in federal court by two
former workers for sex discrimination.
Often
attorneys choose to bring a case in a federal rather than state court or the
other way around for tactical reasons. More often the reason for bringing an
action in a particular court is based solely on the law that serves as the
basis for the claim.

If our
clients’ interest in their land is substantially invaded by stables or kennels
as a result of odors or sounds created by the proper conduct of those
businesses and not taking into account any special sensitivities on the part of
our clients, is the harm to our clients significantly more important than the
benefit of the stables or kennel to the community?