Author: admin

How can the QSEN competencies for nurses be implemented

Core Competencies for Nurses

This week’s graded discussion topic relates to the following Course Outcome (CO).

CO8 Selects evidence for best practice when planning professional nursing care for individuals, families, aggregates, and communities. (PO 8)

Explore the website for the Quality and Safety Education for Nurses (QSEN) initiative at 
http://www.qsen.org (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
. How can the QSEN competencies for nurses be implemented into your workplace or professional nursing setting? If you are not currently employed as a nurse, consider a previous work setting that would have benefited from implementation of the QSEN competencies. How can the QSEN competencies for nurses be implemented

Capstone Project Milestone 3 PowerPoint Project: Educating Staff: Implementing Change Guidelines

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to create the 
Educating Staff: Implementing Change Project
 PowerPoint presentation. Your plan is to educate the staff that will be involved in the pilot program. You will need to educate them on the problem, show the supporting evidence, and how your pilot plan will be implemented.

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following Course Outcomes.

CO2: Proposes leadership and collaboration strategies for use with consumers and other healthcare providers in managing care and/or delegating responsibilities for health promotion, illness prevention, health restoration and maintenance, and rehabilitative activities. (PO2)

CO3: Communicates effectively with patient populations and other healthcare providers in managing the healthcare of individuals, families, aggregates, and communities. (PO3)

CO7: Integrates the professional role of leader, teacher, communicator, and manager of care to plan cost-effective, quality healthcare to consumers in structured and unstructured settings. (PO7)

Points

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW

Milestone 3 is worth 
200 points
.

You are required to use one of the required articles from the Week 3 Milestone 1
 assignment or you will earn a “0” for the assignment. In addition, assignments that do not follow the current guidelines or use the required article will be evaluated for evidence of an academic integrity violation.

After the due date, there will be no opportunity for revision or resubmission of assignments that have been uploaded to the submission area. It is your responsibility to submit the correct assignment to the correct submission area. Capstone Project Milestone 3 PowerPoint Project: Educating Staff: Implementing Change Guidelines

Directions

A tutorial with tips on completing this assignment may be viewed at 
https://atge.webex.com/atge/ldr.php?RCID=8912a4b3268463312e115abf9e73efd6(Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

Create an educational presentation for staff before the launch of your change project. This should inform the staff of the problem, your potential solution, and their role in change project.

The format for this proposal will be a PowerPoint presentation. Capstone Project Milestone 3 PowerPoint Project: Educating Staff: Implementing Change Guidelines

Tutorial: For those not familiar with the development of a PowerPoint slideshow, the following link to the Microsoft website may be helpful. 
http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/support/training-FX101782702.aspx(Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
 The Chamberlain Student Success Strategies (SSPRNBSN) offers a module on Computer Literacy that contains a section on PowerPoint. You can access SSPRNBSN from  your Canvas course list.

The length of the PowerPoint presentation should be 15-20 slides; excluding the title and reference slides.

Below are the main topics or bullet points for your slides:

Title slide

Description of the Ace Star change model that you have used for this project.

Practice Issue (Using the one of the required articles)

Scope of the problem—use basic statistics from what you know of the problem in your work area.

Your team/stakeholders

Evidence to support your need for change—from your Evidence Summary

Action Plan

Timeline for the plan

The nurse’s role and responsibility in the pilot program

Procedure (what steps are to be taken to complete this change process, from start to finish?)

Forms that will be used (if applicable)

Resources available to the staff—including yourself

Summary

References

Citations and References must be included
to support the information within each topic area. Refer to the APA manual, Chapter 7, for examples of proper reference format. Citations are to be noted for all information contained in your paper that is not your original idea or thought. Ask yourself, “How do I know this?” and then cite the source. Scholarly sources are expected, which means choose peer-reviewed journals and credible websites. Capstone Project Milestone 3 PowerPoint Project: Educating Staff: Implementing Change Guidelines

Guidelines

Application: Use Microsoft PowerPoint 2010 or later.

Length: The PowerPoint slide show is expected to be 
between 15-20 slides
in length (not including the title slide and reference list slides).

Submission: Submit your by 11:59 p.m. Sunday by the end of Week 6.

Late Submission: See the Policies on late submissions.

Tutorial: For those not familiar with the development of a PowerPoint slideshow, the following link to the Microsoft website may be helpful. 
http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/support/training-FX101782702.aspx(Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
 The Chamberlain Student Success Strategies (CCSSS) offers a module on Computer Literacy that contains a section on PowerPoint. The link to SSP CCSSS may be found under your course list in the student portal. Capstone Project Milestone 3 PowerPoint Project: Educating Staff: Implementing Change Guidelines

Best Practices in Preparing a PowerPoint Presentation

The following are best practices in preparing this presentation.

Be creative.

Incorporate graphics, clip art, or photographs to increase interest.

Make easy to read with short bullet points and large font.

NR451_Milestone3_2  Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThe Problem

Summary of change model discussed. Practice Issue is stated. Scope of the problem includes information and/or statistics as it relates to your work area and scope of problem to healthcare as a whole discussed. Team and stakeholders and their role/reason chosen is discussed as is logical.

30.0 pts

Summary of change model and Practice issue addressed. Information as it relates to work area, scope of problem to healthcare as a whole, is discussed. Team, stakeholders and role/reason chosen is discussed and is logical.

26.0 pts

One of the elements of the problem summary/practice issue listed in the first column is missing OR lacks detail.

24.0 pts

Two of the elements of the problem summary/practice issue listed in the first column are missing OR lack detail. Capstone Project Milestone 3 PowerPoint Project: Educating Staff: Implementing Change Guidelines

11.0 pts

Three of the elements of the problem summary/practice issue listed in the first column are missing OR lack detail.

0.0 pts

None of the elements were present.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThe Evidence

Discussion of the evidence is done in terms of themes of the multiple views given in the Systematic Review. Pertinent information is summarized. Sources are not listed individually but as an Evidence Summary synthesized into concepts discovered. Include the optional scholarly source if used.

35.0 pts

Discussion of the evidence is done in terms of themes the author/s pull from the multiple articles in the approved Systematic Review. Pertinent information is summarized. Sources are not listed individually but as an Evidence Summary synthesized into concepts discovered. (Include the optional supplemental scholarly article, if used.)

31.0 pts

Discussion of the evidence is adequately described and contains all elements in the first column.

28.0 pts

Discussion of the evidence is briefly described.

13.0 pts

Discussion of the evidence provides a minimal description OR is missing one or more elements from the first column.

0.0 pts

There is no discussion of the evidence.

35.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThe Action Plan

Plan of action described. Important elements are discussed and logical. Timeline is thorough and contains all elements. Timeline is logical and appropriate.

35.0 pts

Plan of action described. Important elements are discussed and logical. Timeline is thorough and contains all elements. Timeline is logical and appropriate.

31.0 pts

Plan of action described but not all important elements included OR timeline is present but doesn’t contain all elements.

28.0 pts

Plan of action and timeline are briefly described.

13.0 pts

Plan of action and timeline are minimally described.

0.0 pts

Plan of action is not present. The timeline is not present.

35.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThe Nurse’s Role

The nurse’s role in the pilot plan is described and clear. Procedures for the pilot plan are clear and concise, from start to finish.

25.0 pts

The nurse’s role in the pilot plan is described and clear. Procedures for the pilot plan are clear and concise.

22.0 pts

The nurses’ role is described but not clear OR procedures are discussed but not clear.

20.0 pts

The nurses’ role and procedures are discussed but are not clear.

10.0 pts

The nurse’s roles and procedures are minimally discussed and lack detail.

0.0 pts

Nurses’ roles are absent. Procedures are absent.

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThe Resources

Tracking process described and/or form for tracking the outcomes during pilot plan is included. Resources the nurses will need to help implement the plan are included. At least three resources are included. The nurse investigator, the team, internet resources, or other resources the staff needs is included.

20.0 pts

Process description and/or form for tracking outcomes during pilot study is included. Resources (to help with the project) the nurses need are included. At least three resources included. The nurse investigator, the team, internet resources, or other resources are included.

18.0 pts

Process description and/or form for tracking outcomes included. At least three resources the nurses need to help with the project are included but the resources were not the best suited resources for the project.

16.0 pts

Process description and/or form are missing 2 or more elements from the first column. Capstone Project Milestone 3 PowerPoint Project: Educating Staff: Implementing Change Guidelines

8.0 pts

Process description and/or form are missing multiple elements from the first column and lack detail.

0.0 pts

Process description and/or form for tracking outcomes is absent. No appropriate resources are listed.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThe Summary

Summary slide reiterates the problem and purpose of the plan along with the measurable goals in terms of success.

10.0 pts

Summary slide reiterates the problem; purpose of the plan; and, measurable goals.

9.0 pts

Summary slide reiterates the problem AND purpose. Goals are stated but are not measurable.

8.0 pts

Summary slide reiterates the problem OR the purpose, but not both. Goals are stated.

4.0 pts

Summary slide reiterates the problem OR the purpose, but not both. Goals are not mentioned.

0.0 pts

Summary slide is not shown.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOverall Presentation

Presentation is presented in a clear and logical manner. PowerPoint is appealing to the eye and includes creativity. Font is easy to read. Speaker notes are present.

20.0 pts

Presentation is presented in a clear and logical manner. PowerPoint is appealing and includes creativity. Font is easy to read. All elements addressed.

18.0 pts

Presentation is accurate and covers most elements.

16.0 pts

Presentation content is accurate and can be followed, but lacks flow and creativity.

8.0 pts

Presentation lacks organization and creativity. Is difficult to follow.

0.0 pts

Presentation lacks any attempt at organization and comes across as chaotic.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics

Includes title slide. Grammar, punctuation, and sentence structure are correct. References are properly cited in APA within the presentation. Reference slide includes all citations. Evidence of spell and grammar check.

25.0 pts

Excellent mechanics. Includes title slide. Grammar, punctuation, and sentence structure are correct. References properly cited within the presentation. Reference slide includes all citations within the PowerPoint presentation. Evidence of spell and grammar check. Minimal errors in all.

22.0 pts

Good mechanics and formatting considering the elements in the first column.

20.0 pts

Fair mechanics and formatting considering the elements in the first column.

10.0 pts

Poor mechanics and formatting considering the elements in the first column.

0.0 pts

Very poor mechanics and formatting such that the presentation was difficult to follow and comprehend.

25.0 pts

Total Points: 200.0

Use 
speaker notes
(found under the section View and “Notes” in the PowerPoint template you choose. These are for your personal use to use as a reference if you are giving your presentation to an audience and they help faculty identify what you will speak to your audience about. Capstone Project Milestone 3 PowerPoint Project: Educating Staff: Implementing Change Guidelines

Review directions thoroughly.

Cite all sources within the slides with (author, year) as well as on the Reference slide.

Proofread prior to final submission.

Spell check for spelling and grammar errors prior to final submission. Capstone Project Milestone 3 PowerPoint Project: Educating Staff: Implementing Change Guidelines

Healthcare Cost and Quality Analysis Essay Assignment Paper

Cost and Quality paper of 500-1,000 words, describe the relationship between health care cost and quality. Address the following:

Select one public agency and one private agency and differentiate their roles and major activities in addressing cost and quality in health care. See Topic 4 readings for sources regarding health care agencies.

Analyze current and projected initiatives to improve quality while simultaneously controlling costs. Describe any unintended consequences. Healthcare Cost and Quality Analysis Essay Assignment Paper

Synthesize implications for staff nurses and advanced practice nurses, including evidence-based practice, relative to cost and quality

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW

Cost and Quality Analysis Rubric

 

1

Unsatisfactory

0.00%

2

Less than Satisfactory

80.00%

3

Satisfactory

88.00%

4

Good

92.00%

5

Excellent

100.00%

75.0 %Content

 

10.0 %Describe the relationship between health care cost and quality.

Does not describe the relationship between health care cost and quality.

Describes issues related to health care cost and health care quality, but does not discuss the relationship between the two.

Describes the relationship between health care cost and quality, but is insufficiently developed.

Adequately describes the relationship between health care cost and quality. There are few inconsistencies. Few examples given.

Fully describes the relationship between health care cost and quality with no inconsistencies. Clear examples given.

20.0 %Differentiate the roles and major activities between one public and one private agency in addressing cost and quality in healthcare.

Does not discuss the roles and major activities of public or private agencies in addressing cost and quality in health care.

Discusses either the roles or the major activities of one public and one private agency in cost and quality in health care, but not both. Healthcare Cost and Quality Analysis Essay Assignment Paper

Discusses, but does not differentiate the roles and major activities of one public and one private agency in addressing cost and quality in health care.

Differentiates the roles and major activities between one public and one private agency in addressing cost and quality in health care, but is insufficiently developed. Minimal use of examples, supporting details, or references.

Clearly and systematically differentiates the roles and major activities between one public and one private agency in addressing cost and quality in health care utilizing references, examples, and supporting details.

20.0 %Analyze current and projected initiatives to improve quality while simultaneously controlling costs. Describe any unintended consequences.

Does not discuss current and projected initiatives to improve quality while simultaneously controlling costs. Does not describe any unintended consequences.

Discusses either current or projected initiatives to improve quality while simultaneously controlling costs, but not both. Does not describe unintended consequences.

Discusses current and projected initiatives to improve quality while simultaneously controlling costs. Does not describe any unintended consequences.

Partially analyzes current and projected initiatives to improve quality while simultaneously controlling costs. Minimally describes unintended consequences.

Comprehensively analyzes current and projected initiatives to improve quality while simultaneously controlling costs. Fully describes unintended consequences. Clear examples given.

20.0 %Synthesize implications for staff nurses and advanced practice nurses, including evidence-based practice, relative to cost and quality.

Does not address any implications for staff nurses and advanced practice nurses, or evidence-based practice, relative to cost and quality.

Discusses implications for either staff nurses or advanced practice nurses relative to cost and quality, but not both. Does not consistently address evidence-based practice.

Discusses implications for staff nurses and advanced practice nurses relative to cost and quality. Briefly addresses evidence-based practice. No examples given.

Synthesizes implications for staff nurses and advanced practice nurses, including evidence-based practice, relative to cost and quality; insufficiently developed. Provides examples, but some inconsistencies present.

Comprehensively synthesizes implications for staff nurses and advanced practice nurses, including evidence-based practice, relative to cost and quality. Clear examples given with no inconsistencies.

5.0 %Paragraph Development and Transitions Style

Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed.

Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident.

Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.

A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are used as appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.

There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The writer has been careful to use paragraph and transition construction to guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless. Individually and collectively, paragraphs are coherent and cohesive ? they ?sparkle.?

10.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

 

5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, and grammar)

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors that distract the reader.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present.

Writer is clearly in control of standard, written American English.

5.0 %Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)

Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction, lack of variety in language use. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of ?primer prose? indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.

Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure may be occasionally ineffective or inappropriate. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately.

Sentence structure is correct and occasionally varies. Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part. Healthcare Cost and Quality Analysis Essay Assignment Paper

The writer is clearly aware of audience; uses a variety of sentence structures and appropriate vocabulary for the target audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.

The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in unique and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.

15.0 %Format

 

10.0 %Evaluating and Documenting Sources (includes use of appropriate style, correct citation format in-text and in reference section

Plagiarism; rarely follows any documentation format correctly; uses non-credible sources. No References section. Healthcare Cost and Quality Analysis Essay Assignment Paper

Uses documentation, but frequent formatting/citation errors are present; some sources have questionable credibility. Reference section is not correctly cited.

Sources used are credible and documented appropriately to the discipline; formatting and citation is usually correct, but some lack of control is apparent. Reference section is correctly cited.

Documentation is appropriate and formatting/citations are correct, although a few errors/typos may be present; most sources are authoritative. Reference section is correctly cited.

There are virtually no errors in documentation format or citation; all sources are authoritative. Reference section is correctly cited and at least 3 references are used

3.0 %Title page

No title page.

Healthcare Cost and Quality Analysis Essay Assignment Paper

Title page is incomplete or inaccurate.

Title page has minor errors.

Title page is complete.

2.0 %Page constraint

Information presented does not meet minimum assigned length of 500 words.

None

Information presented exceeds 1000 words.

None

Information is presented within word limit constraints of 1000 words.

Healthcare Cost and Quality Analysis Essay Assignment Paper

Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) Research Paper

Discussion: Fall-Risk Assessment

Fall risks are very high for the geriatric population. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2013), one out of every three adults aged 65 years and older falls each year. This can be attributed to factors such as changes in aging, other health issues, environment, and effects of prescribed drugs. When caring for geriatric patients, it is important to screen them for risks and perform fall-risk assessments. These assessment tools help to determine the level of risk for patients so that preventive measures can be taken. The implications of falls are very serious and range from fractures to mental health disorders and even death. In this Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) Research Paper Discussion, you explore risk assessment tools for use with patients at your practicum site.

To prepare:

ORDER A CUSTOM-WRITTEN PAPER NOW

Review the Kanis article in this week’s Learning Resources.

Consider a geriatric patient at your practicum site who is at risk for falls. Coordinate an opportunity to assess this patient with your Preceptor.

Note: When referring to your patient, make sure to use a pseudonym or other false form of identification. This is to ensure the privacy and protection of the patient. Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) Research Paper.

In addition to the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX), select one of the following tools to assess this patient for falls:

Tinetti Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA)

Systems Approach

Berg Balance Scale

Elderly Mobility Scale

Timed Unsupported Stead Stand (TUSS)

Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT)

Hendrich II Fall Risk Model

Consider why you selected the assessment tool for this particular patient.

Assess the patient using the tool you selected under Preceptor guidance. Reflect on the assessment, including any issues with the patient and/or the effectiveness of the tool. Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) Research Paper

Think about strategies and interventions to reduce the risk of falls for frail elders.

By Day 3

Post a case study description of a geriatric patient from your practicum site who is at risk for falls. Describe this patient’s FRAX assessment. Then, describe the other assessment tool you used in the fall-risk assessment and explain why you selected the tool for this particular patient. Explain the patient assessment, including any issues with the patient and/or the effectiveness of the tool. Finally, explain strategies to reduce the risk of falls for your patient. Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) Research Paper

World War I Essay Assignment Paper

The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand was the immediate cause of World War I. But the events that led to the Great War go further back into the nineteenth century. As with the Boxer Rebellion of 1900, nationalism, imperialism, and militarism all played a part. World War I Essay Assignment Paper.

ORDER A CUSTOM-WRITTEN PAPER NOW

Analyze how the forces of nationalism, imperialism, and militarism irrevocably led to World War I. Pay particular attention to the rise of Pan-Slavism in Eastern Europe and the corresponding rise of nationalism in German-speaking states. Analyze how the alliance system contributed to the ultimate outbreak of war. World War I Essay Assignment Paper

Then analyze the events that drew the United States into World War I. Clearly discuss why America first remained neutral between1914-1917. What role did ethnicity play in America’s neutrality? Then identify and analyze the specific events that led to America’s entrance into the war. Evaluate America’s contribution to the war effort and to what extent America’s entry contributed to the end of the war. Finally, analyze the events that led to the defeat of the Treaty of Versailles. What effect did this have on America’s role in the world during the 1920s and 1930s? Pay particular attention to the role of President Woodrow Wilson both during and after the war, in particular, his efforts to establish the League of Nations. World War I Essay Assignment Paper

This World War I essay assignment paper must be four to five double-spaced pages in length (not including the References page) and utilize no less than four academic quality sources. Margins should be no more than one inch (right and left) and the essay should be composed in an appropriate font and size. Sources must be documented and cited using APA format. World War I Essay Assignment Paper

Transcultural Theoretical Models in Nursing Essay Assignment Paper

Pick one model/framework (please select one not described in your textbook, here are a few: Leinninger, Purnell, Sager, Galanti, Jeffreys, Spector, Andrews & Boyle) and provide an in-depth analysis:

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW

Your Transcultural Theoretical Models in Nursing Essay Assignment Paper should include the following parts:

Title/Cover Page

Introduction: State the model/framework that you have selected, and the reasoning behind your selection

Application: Choose a specific cultural group (any that we have studied in this course) and apply the chosen frameworks to the cultural group. Describe the details of the framework and how your selected cultural group fits into the framework. Did it work well? Why or why not?

Implications: How do you feel using a framework will impact your nursing practice? Will you continue to use a framework in your daily practice? Why or why not?

Conclusion: Wrap up your thoughts and provide a brief summary of your ideas (250-400 words)

Reference page: Provide a minimum of four scholarly sources

Use APA format and clearly define the components listed above. Your Transcultural Theoretical Models in Nursing Essay Assignment Paper should be between 4-6 pages, including the reference page and title/cover page. Refer to the OU Library’s APA Style Guide for assistance with formatting your paper. Click the assignment link to compare your work to the rubric before submitting it. Click the same link to submit your assignment. Transcultural Theoretical Models in Nursing Essay Assignment Paper

Headache Pathophysiology

Bob, a 38 year old male, has been experiencing severe intermittent headaches for about 10 years. When they occur, he experiences intense burning pain on one side of his head, tearing in his eye, congestion and a runny nose. These headaches generally occur several times a day and last approximately one hour. The headaches are episodic; Bob can be headache free for several months but then experience an attack.

1. Based on the case scenario, provide a diagnosis for Bob. Provide the pathophysiology for this type of headache and discuss current treatment options. Headache Pathophysiology

Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal Essay Assignment Paper

Details:

Students are required to maintain weekly reflective narratives throughout the course to combine into one course-long reflective journal that integrates leadership and inquiry into current practice as it applies to the Professional Capstone and Practicum course. Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal Essay Assignment Paper

In your journal, you will reflect on the personal knowledge and skills gained throughout this course. The journal should address a variable combination of the following, depending on your specific practice immersion clinical experiences: Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal Essay Assignment Paper

Brief introduction

week1

1. New practice approaches

week 2

2. Intraprofessional collaboration

week 3

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW

3. Health care delivery and clinical

systems

week 4

4. Ethical considerations in health care

week5

5. Population health concerns

week 6

6. The role of technology in improving health care outcomes

week 7

7. Health policy

week 8

8. Leadership and economic models

week 9

9. Health disparities

week 10

conclusion and brief recommendation

References

Students will outline what they have discovered about their professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses that surfaced, additional resources and abilities that could be introduced to a given situation to influence optimal outcomes, and finally, how the student met the competencies aligned to this course. Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal Essay Assignment Paper

While APA style is not required for the body of this Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal Essay Assignment Paper , solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal Essay Assignment Paper uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal Essay Assignment Paper

Benchmark – Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal

 

Details:

Students are required to maintain weekly reflective narratives throughout the course to combine into one course-long reflective journal that integrates leadership and inquiry into current practice as it applies to the Professional Capstone and Practicum course.

In your journal, you will reflect on the personal knowledge and skills gained throughout this course. The journal should address a variable combination of the following, depending on your specific practice immersion clinical experiences:

New practice approaches

Intraprofessional collaboration

Health care delivery and clinical systems

Ethical considerations in health care

Population health concerns

The role of technology in improving health care outcomes

Health policy

Leadership and economic models

Health disparities

Students will outline what they have discovered about their professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses that surfaced, additional resources and abilities that could be introduced to a given situation to influence optimal outcomes, and finally, how the student met the competencies aligned to this course.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

 

Please Note: Assignment will not be submitted to the faculty member until the “Submit” button under “Final Submission” is clicked.

 
           

Apply Rubrics

 
Benchmark – Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal

 

1

Unsatisfactory 0-71%

0.00%

2

Less Than Satisfactory 72-75%

75.00%

3

Satisfactory 76-79%

79.00%

4

Good 80-89%

89.00%

5

Excellent 90-100%

100.00%

100.0 %Content

 

10.0 %

New Practice Approaches

New practice approaches are not present. Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal Essay Assignment Paper

New practice approaches are present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

New practice approaches are present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding.

New practice approaches are present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

New practice approaches are present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

10.0 %

Intraprofessional Collaboration (4.3)

Intraprofessional collaboration information is not present.

Intraprofessional collaboration information is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

Intraprofessional collaboration information is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding.

Intraprofessional collaboration information is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

Intraprofessional collaboration information is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

10.0 %

Health Care Delivery And Clinical Systems (4.1)

Health care delivery and clinical systems information is not present.

Health care delivery and clinical systems information is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

Health care delivery and clinical systems information is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding.

Health care delivery and clinical systems information is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

Health care delivery and clinical systems information is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

10.0 %

Ethical Considerations In Health Care (5.4)

Ethical considerations in health care information is not present.

Ethical considerations in health care information is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

Ethical considerations in health care information is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding.

Ethical considerations in health care information is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

Ethical considerations in health care information is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

10.0 %

Population Health Concerns (5.3)

Population health concerns information is not present. Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal Essay Assignment Paper

Population health concerns information is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

Population health concerns information is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding.

Population health concerns information is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

Population health concerns information is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

10.0 %

The Role Of Technology In Improving Health Care Outcomes (4.3)

Information on the role of technology in improving health care outcomes is not present.

Information on the role of technology in improving health care outcomes is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

Information on the role of technology in improving health care outcomes is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding.

Information on the role of technology in improving health care outcomes is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

Information on the role of technology in improving health care outcomes is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

10.0 %

Health Policy

Health policy information is not present.

Health policy information content is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

Health policy information content is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding.

Health policy information content is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

Health policy information content is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

10.0 %

Leadership And Economic Models

Information on leadership and economic models is not present.

Information on leadership and economic models is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

Information on leadership and economic models is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding.

Information on leadership and economic models is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

Information on leadership and economic models is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

10.0 %

Health Disparities (1.5)

Information on health disparities is not present. Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal Essay Assignment Paper

Information on health disparities is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

Information on health disparities is present with minor elements missing that do not impede understanding.

Information on health disparities is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

Information on health disparities is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

5.0 %

Presentation

The piece is not neat or organized, and it does not include all required elements.

The work is not neat and includes minor flaws or omissions of required elements.

The overall appearance is general, and major elements are missing.

The overall appearance is generally neat, with a few minor flaws or missing elements.

The work is well presented and includes all required elements. The overall appearance is neat and professional.

5.0 %

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic En

Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal Essay Assignment Paper

Spin Doctoring Essay Assignment Paper – Critical Thinking Exercise

This assignment is worth up to 75 points. We will apply course concepts from Myers Chapter 7 (Persuasion) to the following case:

Case
.  Spin doctoring is form of impression management that has been in the repertoire of public relations practitioners for four decades.  The term refers to the tactic of shifting the focus off of the negative and harmful aspects of something by substituting another issue that has positive connotations.  Spin doctors change the terms of public perception and debate using the mass media, which today includes blogs and social media like Facebook.  Spin doctoring is an international phenomenon the serves the interests of organizations in every sector of society.

ORDER A CUSTOM-WRITTEN PAPER NOW

The tobacco industry is considered to be the classic case of spin doctoring.  After 1966 when the Surgeon General of the U.S. pronounced that cigarette packages must carry a health warning, the tobacco industry found a way to offset the damaging publicity by sponsoring sports and arts events and giving grants for community development.  By de-emphasizing the dangers of smoking and emphasizing the positive contributions being made to community life, Big Tobacco trivialized the health problems and turned attention instead to its displays of corporate social responsibility. Spin Doctoring Essay Assignment Paper – Critical Thinking Exercise.

A contemporary example of spin doctoring relates to the claim that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, which was the original rationale for the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003.  When the intelligence about weapons of mass destruction proved to be faulty, the debate was quickly and skillfully shifted by spin doctors to a humanitarian argument that the Iraqi people must be freed from the clutches Saddam Hussein the ruthless dictator.  While no evidence of weapons of mass destruction could be found, mass graves of Iraqi citizens killed at the behest of Saddam Hussein
could
be found and thus, legitimate the invasion. Spin Doctoring Essay Assignment Paper – Critical Thinking Exercise.

The debate over climate change and global warming is very similar in some ways to the tobacco example because it involves the efforts of hydrocarbons producers to debunk the hypothesis that global warming is primarily caused by the high levels of CO2 emissions associated with the consumption of fossil fuels.  By spinning the argument away from CO2 emissions towards touting how technology is producing cleaner, greener fuels, the hydrocarbon industry gives the appearance of being environmentally responsible at a time when the pressure from environmental organizations like Greenpeace and the Suzuki Foundation, and high-profile environmentalists like Al Gore cannot be denied.

Your Assignment
:  Use critical thinking to analyze the following three questions relating to aspects of persuasion.  Specifically utilized the particular course concept or concepts stated in each question.

Which paths(s) to persuasion is/are present in the global warming case? Explain how the paths are shown.

How does the tobacco industry example fit into our understanding of impression management?

Is spin doctoring the same as propaganda or is it fundamentally different? How so? Address the weapons of mass destruction case in your answer.

Expectations

You will address each of the required questions in essay form, explaining the reasoning behind your answer and identifying the course concept(s) explicitly;

You will use subheadings so that each question clearly occupies its own section of the paper;

Your name will appear on the first page of your paper; Spin Doctoring Essay Assignment Paper – Critical Thinking Exercise.

You will use APA citations in the text and include a References section at the end of your paper

You will spell and grammar check your paper

Grading:

60 points per question for quality of your answer and use and understanding of course terminology to each of the required questions (20 points per question). Spin Doctoring Essay Assignment Paper – Critical Thinking Exercise.

15 points for orderly presentation in subsections, freedom from spelling and grammar errors, and use of APA style. Spin Doctoring Essay Assignment Paper – Critical Thinking Exercise

Capstone Project Milestone 2: Design for Change Proposal Essay Assignment Paper Guidelines

Purpose

You are to create a Design for Change proposal inclusive of your Practice Issue and Evidence Summary worksheet from your Capstone Project Milestone 1. Your plan is to convince your management team of a nursing problem you have uncovered and you feel is significant enough to change the way something is currently practiced. In the event you are not currently working as a nurse, please use a hypothetical clinical situation you experienced in nursing school, or nursing education issue you identified in your nursing program.

Course Outcomes

ORDER A CUSTOM-WRITTEN PAPER NOW

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes.

CO1: Applies the theories and principles of nursing and related disciplines to individuals, families, aggregates, and communities from entry to the healthcare system through long-term planning. (PO1)

CO2: Proposes leadership and collaboration strategies for use with consumers and other healthcare providers in managing care and/or delegating responsibilities for health promotion, illness prevention, health restoration and maintenance, and rehabilitative activities. (PO2)

Due Date

Milestone 2 consists of the proposal for your Design for Change Capstone Project. Use the Turnitin Inbox to submit this assignment by the end of Week 4.

Rubric

Click to view and download the NR451 Milestone 2: Design for Change Proposal Rubric (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. Capstone Project Milestone 2: Design for Change Proposal Essay Assignment Paper Guidelines

Points

Milestone 2 is worth 225 points.

You are required to use one of the required articles from the Week 3 Milestone 1 assignment or you will earn a ”0” for the assignment. In addition, assignments that do not follow the current guidelines or use the required article will be evaluated for evidence of an academic integrity violation. Capstone Project Milestone 2: Design for Change Proposal Essay Assignment Paper Guidelines

After the due date, there will be no opportunity for revision or resubmission of assignments that have been uploaded to the submission area. It is your responsibility to submit the correct assignment to the correct submission area.

Directions

A tutorial with tips for completing this assignment may be viewed at https://atge.webex.com/atge/ldr.php?RCID=b0c912eaf53b4aabb1347a026466c60e (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

Review the feedback you received from your instructor for Milestone 1, and use it to develop this milestone. Capstone Project Milestone 2: Design for Change Proposal Essay Assignment Paper Guidelines

Create a proposal for your Design for Change Capstone Project. Open the recommended assignment specific Milestone 2 Design Proposal Template (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.. Use this to write your paper. You will include the information from Milestone 1, your practice issue and evidence summary worksheets, as you compose this proposal. Your plan is to convince your management team of a practice problem you have uncovered that is significant enough to change current practice. Capstone Project Milestone 2: Design for Change Proposal Essay Assignment Paper Guidelines

The format for this proposal will be a paper following the Publication manual of APA 6 th edition.

The paper is to be four- to six-pages excluding the Title page and Reference page.

As you organize your information and evidence, include the following topics.

Introduction:
Write an introduction but do not use ”Introduction” as a heading in accordance with the rules put forth in the Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (2010, p. 63). Introduce the reader to the plan with evidence-based problem identification and solution.

Change Model Overview:
Overview of the ACE Star model (the model we have been discussing this session); define the scope of the EBP; identify the stakeholders, and determine the responsibility of the team members.

Evidence:
Conduct internal and external searches of evidence; integrate and summarize the evidence summary worksheet from Milestone 1; develop a recommendation for change.

Translation:
develop a hypothetical action plan; include measurable outcomes, reporting to stakeholders; identify next steps and disseminate the findings. Capstone Project Milestone 2: Design for Change Proposal Essay Assignment Paper Guidelines

Conclusion:
Provide a clear and concise summary, inclusive of the problem issue, the five points of the ACE Star change model; and ways to maintain the change plan.

Citations and References must be included to support the information within each topic area. Refer to the APA manual, Chapter 7, for examples of proper reference format. In-text citations are to be noted for all information contained in your paper that is not your original idea or thought. Ask yourself, ”How do I know this?” and then cite the source. Scholarly sources are expected, which means using peer-reviewed journals and credible websites.

Tables and Figures may be added as appropriate to the project. They should be embedded within the body of the paper (see your APA manual for how to format and cite). Creating tables and figures offers visual aids to the reader and enhances understanding of your literature review and design for change

Capstone Project Milestone 2: Design for Change Proposal Essay Assignment Paper Guidelines

NR451 Milestone2 Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Introduction

Introduction to the plan is nursing focused, with evidence-based problem identification and potential solutions clearly identified.) Capstone Project Milestone 2: Design for Change Proposal Essay Assignment Paper Guidelines

25.0 pts

Introduction to the plan is nursing focused, and evidence-based. Potential interventions clearly identified.

22.0 pts

Introduction to the plan is missing one of the elements listed in the first column.

20.0 pts

Introduction to the plan is missing two elements listed in the first column.

10.0 pts

Introduction lacks evidence to support need for change and/or potential solution is not evidenced-based.

0.0 pts

Introduction is missing.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Change Model Overview

An overview of the ACE Star model as a guide for change is given. Scope of the problem is identified. Stakeholders are identified. Team members and their roles and practice area are identified and discussed. State how nurses should use this model as a guide to facilitate change.

50.0 pts

Overview of the ACE Star model is given. Scope of problem is identified. Rationale for change is present. Stakeholders are identified. Practice area, team members and role are discussed.

44.0 pts

All elements in the first column are included but discussion of one or more items lacks details.

40.0 pts

Overview is missing one of the elements from the first column.

19.0 pts

Overview of the ACE Star model is given. Scope of problem is not identified. Rationale for change is not present. Stakeholders are not identified. Practice area, team members and role are not discussed.

0.0 pts

Change Model Overview is missing all elements of the first column.

50 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Evidence

Evidence is provided thru basic information that indicates a change is needed. For example, there have been 6 urinary tract infections over the last two months and there were none present the last two years at the same time period. What are some of the evidence-based interventions you discovered in your Evidence Summary that do you plan to use?

50.0 pts

Evidence summary is thoroughly provided with information of the current problem in the work setting indicating a change is needed. Interventions discovered in Evidence Summary are used in planning for change.

44.0 pts

Evidence summary contains all elements in the first column, however, one or more items lacks detail.

40.0 pts

Evidence is vaguely provided through information of the current problem in the work setting indicating a change is needed. Some of the interventions discovered in Evidence Summary are used in planning for change.

19.0 pts

Evidence is provided through information of the current problem but is not convincing. Interventions discovered in Evidence Summary are not used in planning for change.

0.0 pts

Evidence summary is not provided. Capstone Project Milestone 2: Design for Change Proposal Essay Assignment Paper Guidelines

50 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Translation

Activities to achieve the final steps of change are fully described. What is needed to achieve? How do you translate what information you have gathered into practice? Include measurable outcomes. How do you inform staff? What is your plan of action to pilot the plan? What is the timeline?

50.0 pts

Activities to achieve final steps of change are fully described. Ways to translate evidence into practice are discussed (outcomes). Methods to inform staff, activities planned for plan of action and timeline are discussed.

44.0 pts

Activities to achieve final steps of change are adequately described.

40.0 pts

Activities to achieve final steps of change are briefly described.

19.0 pts

Minimal description of the activities to achieve final steps of change.

0.0 pts

Activities for final change plan are missing. Translation of evidence into practice is missing.

50 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Conclusion

Clear, solid summary of the key points, ACE Star model and steps of the change plan are included; ways to sustain the change plan are described.

25.0 pts

Detailed summary of main points using ACE Star model. Ways to sustain plan are thoroughly described.

22.0 pts

Summary of main points/model is brief. Ways to sustain plan are briefly described.

20.0 pts

Summary of main points/model is vague. Ways to sustain plan are vaguely described.

10.0 pts

Summary of main points/model OR ways to sustain plan are not described.

0.0 pts

Summary is missing. There is no plan to sustain change.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Mechanics

APA format 6th edition. Grammar, sentence structure, punctuation, and spelling correct. References, citations correct. Paper formatted in APA format. 0-1 errors

25.0 pts

APA format 6th edition. Grammar, sentence structure, punctuation, and spelling correct. References, citations correct. Paper formatted in APA format. 0-1 errors

22.0 pts

Two to three errors in elements from the first column.

20.0 pts

Four to five errors in elements from the first column.

10.0 pts

Six to seven errors in elements from the first column.

0.0 pts

More than seven errors.

25 pts

Capstone Project Milestone 2: Design for Change Proposal Essay Assignment Paper Guidelines