My Blog

Category: Applied Sciences

  • [Solved] Research Design and Methods

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    Describe a dilemma you are currently facing, and the variables involved. Would this dilemma be best resolved by using a correlational analytical approach or a causal-comparative analytical approach? Then, choose a peer(s) response and make a case for using the opposite analytical approach (e.g., If …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Describe a dilemma you are currently facing, and the variables involved. Would this dilemma be best resolved by using a correlational analytical approach or a causal-comparative analytical approach?

    Then, choose a peer(s) response and make a case for using the opposite analytical approach (e.g., If your peer(s) advocates using a test of relationships, such as simple regression analysis, to address their dilemma, make a case for using a test of differences, such as the t-test).

    A dilemma I’m facing is how to prioritize limited facilities resources on an inpatient unit at Penrose Hospital (Colorado) for example do we put our time and dollars into reactive work orders that keep popping up (leaks, temperature complaints, equipment downtime), or do we shift more aggressively toward preventive upgrades that reduce risk over time (PM compliance, high-touch cleaning reliability, airflow/pressure checks, and targeted room refreshes)?  The variables in that decision are the size of the backlog, staff availability, budget, downtime impact, patient acuity, unit census, complaint volume, and safety indicators that matter to leadership (for example, infection trends, environmental deficiencies, or repeated utility interruptions). This has been a total pain that we can't seem to organize well with a lack of capital funding, fte allocations etc.

    I think my dilemma is best addressed with a causal-comparative (ex post facto) approach because the “groups” already exist in practice: units or time periods where proactive facility/EVS interventions were implemented versus units or periods where they were not, and then outcomes can be compared. In causal-comparative research, you categorize people or settings into groups based on a preexisting variable and compare them on an outcome, rather than manipulating conditions like a true experiment (Ary et al., 2010, pp. 45, 333–336). A correlational approach would be useful if I only wanted to see whether two variables move together (like higher PM completion rates being associated with fewer equipment failures), but my real question is closer to “what differences show up between two existing approaches,” which aligns more cleanly with causal-comparative design logic (Ary et al., 2010, pp. 45, 351–352).

    **References**

    Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. K. (2010). _Introduction to research in education_ (8th ed.). Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.

  • [Solved] Applied Sciences Assignment 5

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (1)** – ## Test1Spring26.doc **## Test1Spring26.doc** [removed] **## Test1Spring26.doc** [removed]

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (1)**

    – ## Test1Spring26.doc

    **## Test1Spring26.doc**

    [removed]

    **## Test1Spring26.doc**

    [removed]

  • [Solved] 3Cas

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (1)** – ## 3Casin.docx **## 3Casin.docx** Read: Chapter 3: Using Program Evaluation to Improve the Curriculum A Developmental Approach (p. 23-33) Chapter 4: An Experimental Approach for Evaluating Programs (p. 35-46) Chapter 5: Program Evaluation Through Collaboration (47-61) Chapter 6: Meas…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (1)**

    – ## 3Casin.docx

    **## 3Casin.docx**

    Read:
    Chapter 3: Using Program Evaluation to Improve the Curriculum A Developmental Approach (p. 23-33)
    Chapter 4: An Experimental Approach for Evaluating Programs (p. 35-46)
    Chapter 5: Program Evaluation Through Collaboration (47-61)
    Chapter 6: Measuring Program Outcomes (p. 63-76) in:
    Jason, M. H. (2008).
    _Evaluating programs to increase student achievement._ Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. doi: 10.4135/9781412990264

    Bergin, T. (2018 ). An Introduction to Data Analysis: Quantitative, Qualitative and Mixed Methods. Sage Publications.
    Chapter 4-Introducing Quantitative Data Analysis (30 pp)
    Chapter 6-Introducing Qualitative Data Analysis (23 pp)

    In a 4- to 5-page paper, analyze the following after researching program evaluation data for your organization.

    Cover page

    Introduction: What are the differences in using qualitative and quantitative data in program evaluation?

    Give two examples of how you might use qualitative and quantitative data in your program evaluation.

    How would you ensure you have valid data and are representing the results of the data that you might collect? You will not actually collect any data for this assignment.

    Summary: What would be the most effective type of data collection for your current organization?

    Conclusion

    **Assignment Expectations**

    Your paper will be assessed on the following criteria:

    **Assignment-driven criteria:** Demonstrates mastery covering all key elements of the assignment in a substantive way.

    **Critical thinking/Application to professional practice:** Demonstrates mastery conceptualizing the problem and viewpoints. Assumptions of experts are analyzed, synthesized, and evaluated thoroughly. Conclusions are logically presented and applied to professional practice.

    **Scholarly writing:** Demonstrates mastery and proficiency in scholarly written communication to an appropriately specialized audience.

    **Quality of references and organization:** Demonstrates mastery using relevant and quality sources and uses appropriate, relevant, and compelling content to support ideas, and convey understanding of the topic and shape the work.

    **Citing sources:** Demonstrates mastery using in-text citations or sources and properly uses APA format including a full reference list.

    **Timeliness/Professionalism:** Demonstrates excellence in taking responsibility for learning, adhering to the course requirement policies and expectations. Assignment submitted on time or collaborated with professor for an approved extension on due date.

    **## 3Casin.docx**

    Read:
    Chapter 3: Using Program Evaluation to Improve the Curriculum A Developmental Approach (p. 23-33)
    Chapter 4: An Experimental Approach for Evaluating Programs (p. 35-46)
    Chapter 5: Program Evaluation Through Collaboration (47-61)
    Chapter 6: Measuring Program Outcomes (p. 63-76) in:
    Jason, M. H. (2008).
    _Evaluating programs to increase student achievement._ Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. doi: 10.4135/9781412990264

    Bergin, T. (2018 ). An Introduction to Data Analysis: Quantitative, Qualitative and Mixed Methods. Sage Publications.
    Chapter 4-Introducing Quantitative Data Analysis (30 pp)
    Chapter 6-Introducing Qualitative Data Analysis (23 pp)

    In a 4- to 5-page paper, analyze the following after researching program evaluation data for your organization.

    Cover page

    Introduction: What are the differences in using qualitative and quantitative data in program evaluation?

    Give two examples of how you might use qualitative and quantitative data in your program evaluation.

    How would you ensure you have valid data and are representing the results of the data that you might collect? You will not actually collect any data for this assignment.

    Summary: What would be the most effective type of data collection for your current organization?

    Conclusion

    **Assignment Expectations**

    Your paper will be assessed on the following criteria:

    **Assignment-driven criteria:** Demonstrates mastery covering all key elements of the assignment in a substantive way.

    **Critical thinking/Application to professional practice:** Demonstrates mastery conceptualizing the problem and viewpoints. Assumptions of experts are analyzed, synthesized, and evaluated thoroughly. Conclusions are logically presented and applied to professional practice.

    **Scholarly writing:** Demonstrates mastery and proficiency in scholarly written communication to an appropriately specialized audience.

    **Quality of references and organization:** Demonstrates mastery using relevant and quality sources and uses appropriate, relevant, and compelling content to support ideas, and convey understanding of the topic and shape the work.

    **Citing sources:** Demonstrates mastery using in-text citations or sources and properly uses APA format including a full reference list.

    **Timeliness/Professionalism:** Demonstrates excellence in taking responsibility for learning, adhering to the course requirement policies and expectations. Assignment submitted on time or collaborated with professor for an approved extension on due date.

  • [Solved] Four Spheres of Care Activity

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    In-depth study guidance and analytical solution covering Four Spheres of Care Activity.

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    Full assignment prompt and step-by-step guidance are included in the downloadable solution file.

  • [Solved] S3LP

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (1)** – ## SLP3ins.docx **## SLP3ins.docx** The goal for the Session Long Project is to develop a hypothetical plan to evaluate a program. In each module, you will revise and add various components to the paper. The components are outlined below: SLP 1: Program Overview SLP 2: Purpose and Go…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (1)**

    – ## SLP3ins.docx

    **## SLP3ins.docx**

    The goal for the Session Long Project is to develop a hypothetical plan to evaluate a program. In each module, you will revise and add various components to the paper. The components are outlined below:

    SLP 1: Program Overview
    SLP 2: Purpose and Goals of the Evaluation

    **SLP 3: Data Collection and Instrumentation**
    SLP 4: Data Analysis
    SLP 5: Distribution of Findings
    *Note: You will not conduct the evaluation, but merely plan for one.

    Read:
    Chapter 7: Phase 3 – Obtaining Information to Answer Evaluation Questions (87-110) in:
    Jason, M. H. (2008).
    _Evaluating programs to increase student achievement_. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. doi: 10.4135/9781412990264

    Use the reading to compose a 2- to 3-page paper with the following components:

    1. Data Collection Methods

    a. Instruments

    2. Participants

    3. Resources

    4.  Ethical Considerations

    **SLP Assignment Expectations**

    Your paper will be assessed on the following criteria:

    **Assignment-driven criteria:** Demonstrates mastery covering all key elements of the assignment in a substantive way.

    **Critical thinking/Application to professional practice:** Demonstrates mastery conceptualizing the problem and viewpoints. Assumptions of experts are analyzed, synthesized, and evaluated thoroughly. Conclusions are logically presented and applied to professional practice.

    **Scholarly writing:** Demonstrates mastery and proficiency in scholarly written communication to an appropriately specialized audience.

    **Quality of references and organization:** Demonstrates mastery using relevant and quality sources and uses appropriate, relevant, and compelling content to support ideas, and convey understanding of the topic and shape the work.

    **Citing sources:** Demonstrates mastery using in-text citations or sources and properly uses APA format including a full reference list.

    **Timeliness/Professionalism:** Demonstrates excellence in taking responsibility for learning, adhering to the course requirement policies and expectations. Assignment submitted on time or collaborated with professor for an approved extension on due date.

    [Privacy Policy](http://www.trident.edu/privacy-policy) |
    [Contact](http://www.trident.edu/university-information/contact-us)

    **## SLP3ins.docx**

    The goal for the Session Long Project is to develop a hypothetical plan to evaluate a program. In each module, you will revise and add various components to the paper. The components are outlined below:

    SLP 1: Program Overview
    SLP 2: Purpose and Goals of the Evaluation

    **SLP 3: Data Collection and Instrumentation**
    SLP 4: Data Analysis
    SLP 5: Distribution of Findings
    *Note: You will not conduct the evaluation, but merely plan for one.

    Read:
    Chapter 7: Phase 3 – Obtaining Information to Answer Evaluation Questions (87-110) in:
    Jason, M. H. (2008).
    _Evaluating programs to increase student achievement_. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. doi: 10.4135/9781412990264

    Use the reading to compose a 2- to 3-page paper with the following components:

    1. Data Collection Methods

    a. Instruments

    2. Participants

    3. Resources

    4.  Ethical Considerations

    **SLP Assignment Expectations**

    Your paper will be assessed on the following criteria:

    **Assignment-driven criteria:** Demonstrates mastery covering all key elements of the assignment in a substantive way.

    **Critical thinking/Application to professional practice:** Demonstrates mastery conceptualizing the problem and viewpoints. Assumptions of experts are analyzed, synthesized, and evaluated thoroughly. Conclusions are logically presented and applied to professional practice.

    **Scholarly writing:** Demonstrates mastery and proficiency in scholarly written communication to an appropriately specialized audience.

    **Quality of references and organization:** Demonstrates mastery using relevant and quality sources and uses appropriate, relevant, and compelling content to support ideas, and convey understanding of the topic and shape the work.

    **Citing sources:** Demonstrates mastery using in-text citations or sources and properly uses APA format including a full reference list.

    **Timeliness/Professionalism:** Demonstrates excellence in taking responsibility for learning, adhering to the course requirement policies and expectations. Assignment submitted on time or collaborated with professor for an approved extension on due date.

    [Privacy Policy](http://www.trident.edu/privacy-policy) |
    [Contact](http://www.trident.edu/university-information/contact-us)

  • [Solved] Leadership Styles career activity

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    ## Preparation Use [Basic Search: Strayer University Online Library](https://research.strayer.edu/), [Health Business Elite Database](https://library.strayer.edu/healthbuselite), and the Internet, to research leadership traits and merits. Respond to the following: – Describe some leadership styles a…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    ## Preparation

    Use [Basic Search: Strayer University Online Library](https://research.strayer.edu/), [Health Business Elite Database](https://library.strayer.edu/healthbuselite), and the Internet, to research leadership traits and merits. Respond to the following:

    – Describe some leadership styles and traits that would make you the ideal candidate for an executive position in a health care organization.

    ## Assignment Instructions

    Write a one-page paper (not to exceed 250 words) in which you:

    – Examine at least three leadership styles and traits that would make you the ideal candidate for an executive position in a health care organization.

    This course requires the use of Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). The library is your home for SWS assistance, including citations and formatting. Please refer to the [Library site](https://library.strayer.edu/sws) for all support. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.

    The specific course outcome associated with this assignment is:

    – Synthesize the functions of the master's-prepared health care administrator, including role, responsibilities, and priorities.

    ## Resources

    – [Leadership Styles](https://www.mindtools.com/a7m23wp/leadership-styles).
    – [Basic Search: Strayer University Online Library](https://research.strayer.edu/).
    – [Health Business Elite Database](https://library.strayer.edu/healthbuselite).

  • [Solved] SWOT analysis

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **Please respond to the following:** – **Examine the nature of a strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis. Suggest the manner in which a SWOT could help a health care organization implement a market entry strategy.** – **Identify a minimum of one factor that affects a health…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **Please respond to the following:**

    – **Examine the nature of a strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis. Suggest the manner in which a SWOT could help a health care organization implement a market entry strategy.**
    – **Identify a minimum of one factor that affects a health care organization market entry strategy. You must include the internal and external environments (such as resources, market, competitors, geographical, global, and so on) in each factor.**
    – **Provide specific examples to support your rationale from readings throughout your program or from peer-reviewed journal articles.**
    – **Be sure to respond to at least one of your classmates' posts.**
    – **respond to question and students**

    **SWS format**

    – [\
    \
    IMG_6491.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-6491-png "IMG_6491.png")
    – [\
    \
    IMG_6490.png](https://www.sweetstudy.com/files/img-6490-png "IMG_6490.png")

  • [Solved] Developing a Research Question

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    1. What topic did you choose? What key words did you notice as you scoped out your topic? [You are answering Step 1 and Step 2, #2.] 2. A good research question will be open-ended and will narrow the topic in some way. Please share your research question and explain briefly how you developed it. …

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    1. What topic did you choose? What key words did you notice as you scoped out your topic? [You are answering Step 1 and Step 2, #2.]
    2. A good research question will be open-ended and will narrow the topic in some way. Please share your research question and explain briefly how you developed it. [You are answering Step 2, #3.]
    3. What are the key concepts in your research question and what alternative words can you think of for each concept? [You are answering Step 2, # 5 & #7.]
    4. Try using simple Boolean logic to create a search statement using your key concepts. If you really want to impress me and your classmates, try an advanced searching technique!
    5. What do you feel is still unclear to you about creating a search strategy?

  • [Solved] PLAGIARISM FREE IN 10 HOURS or LESS

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    This week, you will design a PowerPoint presentation with full detailed (speaker notes) based on the project management concepts of risk management, quality management, and evaluation. You will develop a summary of these three elements for your individual health informatics implementation project. Y…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    This week, you will design a PowerPoint presentation with full detailed (speaker notes) based on the project management concepts of risk management, quality management, and evaluation. You will develop a summary of these three elements for your individual health informatics implementation project. You will finalize this presentation in this week’s first assessment, the Individual Project Plan Presentation—Risk, Quality, and Project Evaluation discussion forum. In this discussion forum, you will develop the PowerPoint slides for Section 3 of the Week 5 Informatics Implementation Project Proposal—Video Presentation discussion forum. Your executive-level PowerPoint presentation should be appropriate for a board of directors to have it on their meeting agenda for review. Your presentation should outline financial, technical, and operational risks and mitigation steps; anticipated clinical and business quality metrics to be measured; and any qualitative or quantitative measures to evaluate the project’s effectiveness. Formulate your presentation to be concise and comprised of no more than 8 total slides. Important Aspects of the Presentation Remember the following important aspects of the presentation: The presentation must be 7 content slides, not including the title slide and references slides.

  • [Solved] Applied Sciences Assignment

    ✓ Verified Academic Solution Available

    Executive Solution Overview

    **files (1)** – ## ReflectionPapertwo.docx **## ReflectionPapertwo.docx** Select one item from the BACB® 5th edition task list. Pinpoint a specific behavior or output/permanent product related to the task list item, operationally define it, and determine how you would evaluate a trainee's performanc…

    Instant Solution Download

    $6.99

    Immediate access to the full model answer, formatted citations, and rubric breakdown.

    Need a Fresh Custom Paper?

    Have this question answered from scratch according to your specific instructions and deadline.

    Order on TutorsGallery →

    Assignment Prompt & Instructions

    **files (1)**

    – ## ReflectionPapertwo.docx

    **## ReflectionPapertwo.docx**

    Select one item from the BACB® 5th edition task list. Pinpoint a specific behavior or output/permanent product related to the task list item, operationally define it, and determine how you would evaluate a trainee's performance on the skill, both initially and ongoing. Would you include a checklist, BARS, quiz, or self-assessment? Would you use any fundamental measures or sampling procedures? How will you make your trainees comfortable being assessed on this skill?

    Additionally, please include LINKS or DOIs to any articles or books referenced outside of the assigned readings as part of your APA citation. (As it is required when using web-based references, links to an external site are provided.) Failing to do so will result in point deductions.

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Reflection Length<br>Number of words – excludes reference section and direct quotes from references that are longer than 5 words | **5 to >3.0 pts Meets Expectations** Reflection paper content was greater than 150 words.<br> <br>**3 to >0.0 pts Partially Meets Expectations** Reflection paper content was between 100-149 words.<br> <br>**0 pts Does not Meet Expectations** Reflection paper content was less than 99 words. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Grammar, Usage, and Spelling<br>Utilizes proper grammar and spelling as outlined below. | **5 to >3.0 pts Meets Expectations** Reflection paper contained less than 2 grammar, usage, or spelling errors.<br> <br>**3 to >0.0 pts Partially Meets Expectations** Reflection paper contained 3-4 grammar, usage, or spelling errors.<br> <br>**0 pts Does not Meet Expectations** Reflection paper contained more than 5 grammar, usage, or spelling errors and proofreading was not apparent. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome References and Utilization of Outside Resources<br>Inclusion of one peer reviewed behavioral source and one course assigned reading | **5 to >3.0 pts Meets Expectations** The author used references from peer- reviewed behavioral sources in APA format and cited one or more original behavioral references, outside of the assigned readings. Hyperlinks to the cited external references are provided.<br> <br>**3 to >0.0 pts Partially Meets Expectations** The author used references in APA format of assigned readings but did not include an additional peer-reviewed behavioral reference or did not include a hyperlink to the externally cited reference.<br> <br>**0 pts Does not Meet Expectations** The author neither utilized APA format for referenced material used nor cited an outside peer-reviewed behavioral reference. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Addressing the Prompt & Application<br>Author answers the questions presented in the prompt and applies the week's readings/topics. | **5 to >3.0 pts Meets Expectations** Directly and thoroughly responds to the assignment prompt, demonstrating clear understanding of the required topic. Develops ideas logically and coherently, using organized, empirical, and evidenceinformed writing. Shows strong application of the week’s assigned readings or topic, making explicit, accurate connections between course content and the student’s insights.<br> <br>**3 to >0.0 pts Partially Meets Expectations** Responds to the assignment prompt, but the development of ideas may be only partially clear, briefly addressed, or lacking depth. Organization may be uneven, with some logical flow but limited support for claims. References the week’s topic or readings only tangentially, without demonstrating real application or meaningful integration. Contains general or surfacelevel statements rather than wellsupported insights.<br> <br>**0 pts Does not Meet Expectations** Does not respond to the assignment prompt, OR focuses mainly on personal opinions or unrelated content. Lacks logical organization, clarity, and development of ideas. Demonstrates no or limited application of the week’s assigned readings or topic. Provides irrelevant or unsupported information, showing minimal or no connection to course material. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Peer Review<br>Your peer review text must be copied and pasted into the comments of your own reflection paper submission to receive credit. | **5 to >3.0 pts Meets Expectations** Completes peer-review of colleague’s reflection paper and provides well-thought- out, thorough feedback.<br> <br>**3 to >0.0 pts Partially Meets Expectations** Completes peer-review of colleague’s reflection paper, but provides only vague, non-specific feedback or input.<br> <br>**0 pts Does not Meet Expectations** Does not complete peer- review of a colleague’s reflection paper or does not copy the text into the comments section of their own submission to allow for grading. | 5 pts |

    **## ReflectionPapertwo.docx**

    Select one item from the BACB® 5th edition task list. Pinpoint a specific behavior or output/permanent product related to the task list item, operationally define it, and determine how you would evaluate a trainee's performance on the skill, both initially and ongoing. Would you include a checklist, BARS, quiz, or self-assessment? Would you use any fundamental measures or sampling procedures? How will you make your trainees comfortable being assessed on this skill?

    Additionally, please include LINKS or DOIs to any articles or books referenced outside of the assigned readings as part of your APA citation. (As it is required when using web-based references, links to an external site are provided.) Failing to do so will result in point deductions.

    | | | |
    | — | — | — |
    | **Criteria** | **Ratings** | **Pts** |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Reflection Length<br>Number of words – excludes reference section and direct quotes from references that are longer than 5 words | **5 to >3.0 pts Meets Expectations** Reflection paper content was greater than 150 words.<br> <br>**3 to >0.0 pts Partially Meets Expectations** Reflection paper content was between 100-149 words.<br> <br>**0 pts Does not Meet Expectations** Reflection paper content was less than 99 words. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Grammar, Usage, and Spelling<br>Utilizes proper grammar and spelling as outlined below. | **5 to >3.0 pts Meets Expectations** Reflection paper contained less than 2 grammar, usage, or spelling errors.<br> <br>**3 to >0.0 pts Partially Meets Expectations** Reflection paper contained 3-4 grammar, usage, or spelling errors.<br> <br>**0 pts Does not Meet Expectations** Reflection paper contained more than 5 grammar, usage, or spelling errors and proofreading was not apparent. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome References and Utilization of Outside Resources<br>Inclusion of one peer reviewed behavioral source and one course assigned reading | **5 to >3.0 pts Meets Expectations** The author used references from peer- reviewed behavioral sources in APA format and cited one or more original behavioral references, outside of the assigned readings. Hyperlinks to the cited external references are provided.<br> <br>**3 to >0.0 pts Partially Meets Expectations** The author used references in APA format of assigned readings but did not include an additional peer-reviewed behavioral reference or did not include a hyperlink to the externally cited reference.<br> <br>**0 pts Does not Meet Expectations** The author neither utilized APA format for referenced material used nor cited an outside peer-reviewed behavioral reference. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Addressing the Prompt & Application<br>Author answers the questions presented in the prompt and applies the week's readings/topics. | **5 to >3.0 pts Meets Expectations** Directly and thoroughly responds to the assignment prompt, demonstrating clear understanding of the required topic. Develops ideas logically and coherently, using organized, empirical, and evidenceinformed writing. Shows strong application of the week’s assigned readings or topic, making explicit, accurate connections between course content and the student’s insights.<br> <br>**3 to >0.0 pts Partially Meets Expectations** Responds to the assignment prompt, but the development of ideas may be only partially clear, briefly addressed, or lacking depth. Organization may be uneven, with some logical flow but limited support for claims. References the week’s topic or readings only tangentially, without demonstrating real application or meaningful integration. Contains general or surfacelevel statements rather than wellsupported insights.<br> <br>**0 pts Does not Meet Expectations** Does not respond to the assignment prompt, OR focuses mainly on personal opinions or unrelated content. Lacks logical organization, clarity, and development of ideas. Demonstrates no or limited application of the week’s assigned readings or topic. Provides irrelevant or unsupported information, showing minimal or no connection to course material. | 5 pts |
    | This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Peer Review<br>Your peer review text must be copied and pasted into the comments of your own reflection paper submission to receive credit. | **5 to >3.0 pts Meets Expectations** Completes peer-review of colleague’s reflection paper and provides well-thought- out, thorough feedback.<br> <br>**3 to >0.0 pts Partially Meets Expectations** Completes peer-review of colleague’s reflection paper, but provides only vague, non-specific feedback or input.<br> <br>**0 pts Does not Meet Expectations** Does not complete peer- review of a colleague’s reflection paper or does not copy the text into the comments section of their own submission to allow for grading. | 5 pts |