Category: Nursing

  • NURS 6560 – Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients Essay Assignment Paper

    NURS 6560 – Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients Essay Assignment Paper

    Pre- and Post-Operative Care

    “A wide range of illnesses and injuries may require treatment that includes some type of surgical intervention. Surgery may be planned or unplanned, major or minor, invasive or noninvasive, and may involve any body part or system”

    —Pamela Lynn (2008).

    As this quotation suggests, advanced practice nurses must be able to provide pre- and post-operative care to patients with various illnesses and injuries. Consider a 17-year-old patient who is injured in a car accident. The patient has severe burns on her legs, and several toes on her right foot require amputation. Her injuries are affecting multiple body systems. As an advanced practice nurse, how might you stabilize and prepare this patient for surgery? What areas of care will be your focus as the patient recovers from surgery?

    This week, you examine and discuss limitations and challenges of clinical practice. Then, as you explore the role of the advanced practice nurse in perioperative settings, you examine strategies for assessing, diagnosing, and treating patients in pre- and post-operative care. NURS 6560 – Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients Essay Assignment Paper

    Learning Objectives

    ORDER A CUSTOM-WRITTEN PAPER NOW

    By the end of this week, students will:

    Analyze limitations and challenges of clinical practice

    Evaluate pre- and post-operative care patients

    Develop differential diagnoses for pre- and post-operative care patients

    Develop treatment plans for pre- and post-operative care patients

    Photo Credit: PhotoAlto/Odilon Dimier/PhotoAlto Agency RF Collections/Getty Images

    Learning Resources

    Required Readings

    Colyar, M. R. (2015).
    Advanced practice nursing procedures
    (1st ed.). Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis Company.

    Chapter 1, “Punch Biopsy”

    Chapter 2, “Skin Biopsy”

    Chapter 4, “Abscesses—Incision and Drainage Drainage (Furuncle, Felon, Paronychia, Pilonidal Cyst, Perianal Cyst)”

    Chapter 7, “Burns—Debridement”

    Chapter 8, “Digital Nerve Block”

    Chapter 12, “Sebaceous Cyst Removal”

    Chapter 17, “Soft Tissue Aspiration”

    Chapter 21, “Subungual Hematoma Excision”

    Chapter 22, “Suture Insertion”

    Chapter 23, “Suture Selection”

    Chapter 24, “Suture Removal”

    Chapter 26, “Topical Hemostatic Agent Application”

    Chapter 27, “Ulcer Debridement”

    Doherty, G. M. (2015).
    Current diagnosis and treatment: Surgery
    (14th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill. NURS 6560 – Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients Essay Assignment Paper

    Chapter 6, “Wound Healing”

    Chapter 8, “Inflammation, Infection, & Antimicrobial Therapy in Surgery”

    Chapter 9, “Fluid & Electrolyte Management & Acid-Base Disorders”

    Chapter 10, “Surgical Metabolism & Nutrition”

    Chapter 13, “Management of the Injured Patient”

    Chapter 14, “Burns & Other Thermal Injuries”

    Document:
    i-Human Patients, Inc. (2014).
    i-Human patients case player student manual.

    Throughout this course, you will be required to complete case study assignments within i-Human Patients. This manual provides guidance on accessing and using these simulation. It is highly recommended that you explore the various training resources offered in this manual in preparation for the upcoming Assignments.Throughout this course, you will be required to complete case study assignments within i-Human Patients. This manual provides guidance on accessing and using these simulation. It is highly recommended that you explore the various training resources offered in this manual in preparation for the upcoming Assignments. NURS 6560 – Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients Essay Assignment Paper

    Required Media

    Note:
     You should have received an e-mail with your i-Human Patients login and password information. If you have not received this information, please contact your Instructor.

    i-Human Patient Cases. (2014). Retrieved from https://ih2.i-human.com/users/sign_in

    Vo, H. (2012).
    Placement of central venous catheter—NEJM
    [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HE5QhsPRaPU

    Optional Resources

    University of Michigan Trauma Burn Center. (2015).
    Fluid resuscitation.
    Retrieved from http://www.traumaburn.org/referring/fluid.shtml

    U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. (2014).
    Burn triage and treatment: Thermal injuries.
    Retrieved from http://www.remm.nlm.gov/burns.htm

    Discussion Part I: Limitations and Challenges

    From providing ongoing assessments to monitoring for complications and facilitating recovery, advanced practice nurses who care for patients in perioperative environments experience a unique set of limitations and challenges. Reflecting on your experiences in this complex and critical environment will help you develop your professional competency and prepare you for your future role as an advanced practice nurse. In this week’s Discussion, you consider limitations and challenges of clinical practice in perioperative care settings. NURS 6560 – Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients Essay Assignment Paper

    To prepare:

    Reflect on this week’s clinical experiences.

    Consider one limitation or challenge you encountered.

    Think about how you overcame this limitation or challenge and how this might affect your future practice in pre- and post-operative care settings.

    By Day 3

    Post
     a description of at least one limitation or challenge you encountered during your clinical experience this week. Explain how you overcame this limitation or challenge and how this might affect your future practice.

    Note:
     If you refer to a patient in your Discussions or Assignments, be sure to use a pseudonym or other false form of identification. This is to ensure the privacy and protection of the patient.

    Read
     a selection of your colleagues’ responses.

    By Day 6

    Respond
     to 
    two colleagues
     by sharing additional insights or alternative perspectives.

    Discussion Part II: Pharmacology

    Note:
     To access this week’s required library resources, please click on the link to the Course Readings List, found in the Course Materials section of your Syllabus.

    To prepare:

    Read the following articles to enhance your knowledge of commonly prescribed medications:

    Ando, S., Yasugi, D., Matsumoto, T., Kanata, S., & Kasai, K. (2014). Serious outcomes associated with overdose of medicines containing barbiturates for treatment of insomnia.
    Psychiatry Clinical Neuroscience, 68
    (9), 721.

    Serious outcomes associated with overdose of medicines containing barbiturates for treatment of insomnia by Ando, S., et al in Psychiatry Clinical Neuroscience, 68(9). Copyright 2014 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Reprinted by permission of John Wiley & Sons, Inc., via the Copyright Clearance Center.

    Dassanayake, T. L., Jones, A. L., Michie, P. T., Carter, G. L., McElduff, P., Stokes, B. J., & Whyte, I. M. (2012). Risk of road traffic accidents in patients discharged following treatment for psychotropic drug overdose: A self-controlled case series study in Australia.
    CNS Drugs 26
    (3), 269–276. NURS 6560 – Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients Essay Assignment Paper

    Note:
    Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.

    Kulick, D., & Deen, D. (2011). Specialized nutrition support.
    American Family Physician, 83
    (2), 173–183. Retrieved from http://www.aafp.org/afp/2011/0115/p173.html

    Martini, D. I., Nacca, N., Haswell, D., Cobb, T., & Hodgman, M. (2015). Serotonin syndrome following metaxalone overdose and therapeutic use of a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor.
    Clinical Toxicology 53
    (3), 185–187.

    Serotonin syndrome following metaxalone overdose and therapeutic use of a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor by Martini, D., in Clinical Toxicology, 53(3). Copyright 2015 by Informa Healthcare. Reprinted by permission of Informa Healthcare via the Copyright Clearance Center.

    Robinson, A., & Wermeling, D. P. (2014). Intranasal naloxone administration for treatment of opioid overdose.
    American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 71
    (24), 2129–2135.

    Note:
    Retrieved from the Walden Library databases. NURS 6560 – Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients Essay Assignment Paper

    Thomas, D. R. (2013). Total parenteral nutrition (TPN). In
    The Merck Manual Professional Edition.
    Retrieved from http://www.merckmanuals.com/professional/nutritional_disorders/nutritional_support/total_parenteral_

    All of the following groups of medications are commonly prescribed in the acute care setting. Choose one of the topics below to discuss. If it is a medication group, select a specific drug within that group. (This is a good way for you to prepare for clinical practice, because you will get to know the drugs you will prescribe for patients.). Focus your discussion on the hospital or ICU setting and IV usage.

    KPhos, bicarb, calcium, magnesium

    Iron, folic acid, B12

    Diamox

    Macrolides

    Muinolones/mluoroquinolone

    Cephalosporins, 4th and 5th generation

    Aminoglycosides

    Carbapenems

    Lipopeptide

    Tigecycline

    Note:
     When sharing your initial post, select a topic that has not yet been discussed. If all topics have been discussed, then you may select that topic again, but select a different drug within the medication group. NURS 6560 – Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients Essay Assignment Paper

    By Day 3

    For this Discussion, address 1 of the following options:

    Option 1

    Post
     a description of a patient you have taken care of (inpatient as an RN, or as an NP student) who has been prescribed the medication you selected. Include the scenario, indication, dosing, complications, and outcome. Then explain whether or not you would have ordered the same drug and same dose.

    Option 2

    Conduct an evidence-based drug search on the drug you selected and 
    post
     an explanation of any possible issues. Are there any drug interactions? Any black box warnings? To what type of patient would you prescribe this medication?

    Option 3

    Post
     an explanation of the properties of the drug you selected, including usages and dosing in the hospital or ICU. Discuss a patient to whom you would prescribe this medication.

    Note:
     To be considered as one of your required responses, your pharmacology rationale must include a supporting reference.

    Note:
     For this Discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the “Post to Discussion Question” link and then select “Create Thread” to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click on Submit, you cannot delete or edit your own posts, and you cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking on Submit! NURS 6560 – Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients Essay Assignment Paper

    Submission and Grading Information

    Grading Criteria

    Week 2 Discussion Rubric

    Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6

    To participate in this Discussion:

    Week 2 Discussion

    Assignment: Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients

    The perioperative period is critical for surgical patients. Whether patients require fluid and electrolyte management, pain management, or treatment for infections or surgical complications, advanced practice nurses must be able to provide safe and effective care. For this Assignment, as you examine this week’s i-Human patient case study, consider how you might evaluate and treat patients who require pre- and post-operative care. NURS 6560 – Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients Essay Assignment Paper

    To prepare:

    Review this week’s Learning Resources. Consider how to assess, diagnose, and treat patients in pre- and post-operative care.

    Review this week’s i-Human case study. Based on the patient information provided, think about the health history you would need to collect from the patient.

    Consider what physical exams and diagnostic tests would be appropriate to gather more information about the patient’s condition. Reflect on how the results would be used to make a diagnosis. NURS 6560 – Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients Essay Assignment Paper

    Identify three to five possible conditions to consider in a differential diagnosis for the patient.

    Consider the patient’s diagnosis. Think about clinical guidelines that might support this diagnosis.

    Develop a treatment plan for each patient that includes health promotion and patient education strategies for pre- and post-operative care patients.

    To complete:

    As you interact with this week’s i-Human patient, complete the assigned case study. As you interact with this week’s i-Human patients, complete the assigned case studies. For guidance on using i-Human, refer to the 
    i-Human Patients Case Player Student Manual
     in the Week 2 Learning Resources.

    By Day 7

    This Assignment is due.

    Grading Information

    Week 2 i-Human Rubric

    Week in Review

    This week
     you analyzed the unique set of limitations and challenges when providing safe and effective care in perioperative environments for pre-and-post operative patients. You also developed differential diagnoses and treatment plans for these patients. NURS 6560 – Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients Essay Assignment Paper

    Next week
     you will explore the assessment and care of pre- and post-operative patients with conditions specifically related to the head, neck, esophagus, and diaphragm, and examine strategies for assessment, diagnosis, and treatment.

    NURS 6560 – Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients Essay Assignment Paper

    Application_Rubric

     

    Novice

    Emerging

    Proficient

    HPI Statement

    0 
    (0%)
     – 5 
    (5%)

    Poorly written HPI statement. Incomplete ideas and sentences. Lacks basic history taking skills

    6 
    (6%)
     – 10 
    (10%)

    Well written HPI statement but may be missing 1-2 key components from the history

    11 
    (11%)
     – 15 
    (15%)

    Clearly written HPI statement with comprehensive information gathering from case questions.

    Objective testing and physical exam

    0 
    (0%)
     – 5 
    (5%)

    Poorly written physical examination. May be missing 3 or more key exam findings that are critical to patient’s diagnosis. Includes 3 or more inappropriate exams or tests.

    6 
    (6%)
     – 10 
    (10%)

    Well written physical examination but may be missing 1-2 key exam findings critical to patient’s diagnosis. May include 1-2 unnecessary exams or tests.

    11 
    (11%)
     – 15 
    (15%)

    Clearly written physical examination covering all critical components of a focus exam. Tests that are ordered are appropriate for patient and cost effective.

    Assessment

    0 
    (0%)
     – 10 
    (10%)

    Differential diagnosis list too brief and inconclusive. May be missing 3 or more critical components. Priority list may be out of order. Primary diagnosis may be wrong.

    11 
    (11%)
     – 19 
    (19%)

    Well written differential diagnoses. May be missing 1-2 critical components. Correct primary diagnosis identified.

    20 
    (20%)
     – 25 
    (25%)

    Clearly written differential diagnoses. Primary diagnosis identified.

    Plan for patient

    0 
    (0%)
     – 15 
    (15%)

    Poorly written plan. May be missing 3 or more key issues that are critical to patient’s diagnosis.

    16 
    (16%)
     – 25 
    (25%)

    Well written plan but may be missing 1-2 key issues critical to patient’s diagnosis.

    26 
    (26%)
     – 30 
    (30%)

    Clearly written plan covering all critical components for patient’s final diagnosis.

    Clinical Questions

    0 
    (0%)
     – 10 
    (10%)

    Correctly answered 0-69% of the clinical question

    11 
    (11%)
     – 13 
    (13%)

    Correctly answered 70-89% of the clinical question

    14 
    (14%)
     – 15 
    (15%)

    Correctly answered 90-100% of the clinical questions

    NURS 6560 – Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients Essay Assignment Paper

    Discussion_Rubric

     

    Outstanding Performance

    Excellent Performance

    Competent Performance

    Proficient Performance

    Room for Improvement

    Main Posting:

    Response to the discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

    44 
    (44%)
     – 44 
    (44%)

    Thoroughly responds to the discussion question(s)

    is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

    supported by at least 3 current, credible sources

    40 
    (40%)
     – 43 
    (43%)

    Responds to the discussion question(s)

    is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

    75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth

    supported by at least 3 credible references.NURS 6560 – Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients Essay Assignment Paper

    35 
    (35%)
     – 39 
    (39%)

    Responds to most of the discussion question(s)

    is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

    50% of post has exceptional depth and breadth

    supported by at least 3 credible references

    31 
    (31%)
     – 34 
    (34%)

    Responds to some of the discussion question(s)

    one to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed

    is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis

    somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

    post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references

    0 
    (0%)
     – 30 
    (30%)

    Does not respond to the discussion question(s)

    lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria

    lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis

    does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

    contains only 1 or no credible references

    Main Posting:

    Writing

    NURS 6560 – Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients Essay Assignment Paper

    6 
    (6%)
     – 6 
    (6%)

    Written clearly and concisely

    Contains no grammatical or spelling errors

    Fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style

    5.5 
    (5.5%)
     – 5.5 
    (5.5%)

    Written clearly and concisely

    May contain one or no grammatical or spelling error

    Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style

    5 
    (5%)
     – 5 
    (5%)

    Written concisely

    May contain one to two grammatical or spelling error

    Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style

    4.5 
    (4.5%)
     – 4.5 
    (4.5%)

    Written somewhat concisely

    May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors

    Contains some APA formatting errors

    0 
    (0%)
     – 4 
    (4%)

    Not written clearly or concisely

    Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors

    Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style

    Main Posting:

    Timely and full participation

    10 
    (10%)
     – 10 
    (10%)

    Meets requirements for timely and full participation

    posts main discussion by due date

    0 
    (0%)
     – 0 
    (0%)

    NA

    0 
    (0%)
     – 0 
    (0%)

    NA

    0 
    (0%)
     – 0 
    (0%)

    NA

    0 
    (0%)
     – 0 
    (0%)

    Does not meet requirement for full participation

    First Response:

    Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.

    9 
    (9%)
     – 9 
    (9%)

    Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings

    responds to questions posed by faculty

    the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives

    8.5 
    (8.5%)
     – 8.5 
    (8.5%)

    Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings

    7.5 
    (7.5%)
     – 8 
    (8%)

    Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting

    6.5 
    (6.5%)
     – 7 
    (7%)

    Response is on topic, may have some depth

    0 
    (0%)
     – 6 
    (6%)

    Response may not be on topic, lacks depth

    First Response:

    Writing

    6 
    (6%)
     – 6 
    (6%)

    Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues

    Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed

    Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources

    Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

    5.5 
    (5.5%)
     – 5.5 
    (5.5%)

    Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues

    Response to faculty questions are answered if posed

    Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources

    Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

    5 
    (5%)
     – 5 
    (5%)

    Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues

    Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed

    Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources

    Response is written in Standard Edited English

    4.5 
    (4.5%)
     – 4.5 
    (4.5%)

    Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication

    Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed

    Few or no credible sources are cited

    0 
    (0%)
     – 4 
    (4%)

    Responses posted in the discussion lack effective

    Response to faculty questions are missing

    No credible sources are cited

    First Response:

    Timely and full participation

    5 
    (5%)
     – 5 
    (5%)

    Meets requirements for timely and full participation

    posts by due date

    0 
    (0%)
     – 0 
    (0%)

    NA

    0 
    (0%)
     – 0 
    (0%)

    NA

    0 
    (0%)
     – 0 
    (0%)

    NA

    0 
    (0%)
     – 0 
    (0%)

    Does not meet requirement for full participation

    Second Response:

    Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.

    9 
    (9%)
     – 9 
    (9%)

    Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings * responds to questions posed by faculty

    the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives

    NURS 6560 – Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients Essay Assignment Paper

    8.5 
    (8.5%)
     – 8.5 
    (8.5%)

    Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings

    7.5 
    (7.5%)
     – 8 
    (8%)

    Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting

    6.5 
    (6.5%)
     – 7 
    (7%)

    Response is on topic, may have some depth

    0 
    (0%)
     – 6 
    (6%)

    Response may not be on topic, lacks depth

    Second Response:

    Writing

    6 
    (6%)
     – 6 
    (6%)

    Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues

    Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed

    Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources

    Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

    5.5 
    (5.5%)
     – 5.5 
    (5.5%)

    Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues

    Response to faculty questions are answered if posed

    Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources

    Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

    5 
    (5%)
     – 5 
    (5%)

    Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues

    Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed

    Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources

    Response is written in Standard Edited English

    4.5 
    (4.5%)
     – 4.5 
    (4.5%)

    Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication

    Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed

    Few or no credible sources are cited

    0 
    (0%)
     – 4 
    (4%)

    Responses posted in the discussion lack effective

    Response to faculty questions are missing

    No credible sources are cited.NURS 6560 – Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients Essay Assignment Paper

    Second Response:

    Timely and full participation

    5 
    (5%)
     – 5 
    (5%)

    Meets requirements for timely and full participation

    Posts by due date

    0 
    (0%)
     – 0 
    (0%)

    NA

    0 
    (0%)
     – 0 
    (0%)

    NA

    0 
    (0%)
     – 0 
    (0%)

    NA

    0 
    (0%)
     – 0 
    (0%)

    Does not meet requirement for full participation

    NURS 6560 – Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients Essay Assignment Paper

  • PSYC305 – Communication & Power – Its Use and Misuse Discussion Essay Assignment Papers

    PSYC305 – Communication & Power – Its Use and Misuse Discussion Essay Assignment Papers

    Communication

    It has been said that communication controls, motivates, provides release, and facilitates decision-making. What happens in an organization when communication is limited? How does downward and upward communication affect the functions mentioned above?

    PSYC305 – Communication & Power – Its Use and Misuse Discussion Essay Assignment Papers

    Power – Its Use and Misuse

    TS Eliot wrote, “Half of the harm that is done in this world is caused by people who have power and want to feel important. They do not mean to do harm… they are simply absorbed in the useless struggle to think well of themselves.” (Manning & Curtis , p. 167)

    ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW

    Please do Exercise 8-1, p. 169. What kind of power does your supervisor commonly use, and what has been the outcome of their behavior…on the employees, on the company?.

    PSYC305 – Communication & Power – Its Use and Misuse Discussion Essay Assignment Papers

    Team Assignment 1

    Please read the page “Team Assignments Approach and Overview” located in the Files section of the Course Menu for an overview of approach and requirements for Team Assignments, and the following detailed instructions for Team Assignment 1 to be started in Week 1, and completed in Week 2.

    As you know, to develop leadership skills, hands-on in this course, you are being put in virtual teams of 4. With your team members, you will complete 4 team assignments, one in each of weeks 2, 3, 5, and 6. You will do this by each team member having the opportunity to be the Leader in at least one of the Team Assignments (while others take on other specific roles that week).

    Objectives of Team Assignment 1 (due Week 2)

    To become aware of your leadership qualities, where and how they were developed, areas that need development, and how you could start developing your leadership qualities; and

    In order to work together virtually, you will share information with your team about how and when you are available for communication with your team, and your leadership and course goals as stated in 1) above.

    Tasks and deliverables for the team assignment of Weeks 1 and 2 – to be completed in week 2:

    Instructions:
     Team Assignment 1 requires you to

    Get started in Week 1 to

    Individually, analyze your leadership strengths, and areas to develop and improve, based on the personal Leadership development and Course goals document (LDCG) in the Files section of the Course Menu,

    Indicate your program, experience with online courses, day and time availability, contact information (phone, chat, e-mail address), and time zones, etc… using the Communication Preferences (CP) document in the Files section of the Course Menu. PSYC305 – Communication & Power – Its Use and Misuse Discussion Essay Assignment Papers

    Communicate and share the above information in LDCG and CP documents, with your team members, by posting in Team Discussions.

    Continue in Week 2 to

    Share the above information with each other,

    As a team, using the above information, plan out team roles, such as leader, motivator, communicator, facilitator, etc…, for all team members, for all 4 team assignment weeks 2, 3, 5 and 6, as suggested in Team Roles document in the Files section of the Course Menu.

    Collate all team members’ Leadership Development and Course goals and Communication Preferences information with Team roles, in ONE Word document. You may create a table in Word, or an Excel worksheet to represent the information on Leadership and Course Goals (LDCG) summary and Communication Preferences (CP) summary, and submit with the Team Roles information, all in ONE Word document.

    Team assignment deliverable must be submitted in three places: at the end of the Team discussions by Team Leader, in the Files section of the Course Menu by the leader, and in your own Week 2 Team Assignment area by each team member. PSYC305 – Communication & Power – Its Use and Misuse Discussion Essay Assignment Papers

    To ensure productivity by each member of your team, a Team Leader and Member Report (TLMR), available in the Files section of the Course Menu, will be completed by each member of the team and posted by each member in the Team discussions between Friday and Saturday midnight, and in their own Team Assignment area along with their Team assignment deliverable/ product by Sunday 11:59pm.If the TLMR is not posted in Team discussions and own area by Sunday 11:59pm, up to 20% points may be deducted from the full points of the Team assignment. PSYC305 – Communication & Power – Its Use and Misuse Discussion Essay Assignment Papers

    If the TLMR is not posted in Team discussions and own area by Sunday 11:59pm, up to 20% points may be deducted from the full points of the Team assignment.

    Rubric

    In general, for the weekly Team Assignment, marks will be given on the following basis:

    Quality of Team deliverable/ product: 50%

    Creativity in Team deliverable/product: 10%

    Individual Participation: 40%

    For Team Assignment 1 (due Week 2), 65 points will be awarded as follows:

    Quality of Team deliverable/ Product: 50%. 33/65

    Leadership Development and Course Goals summary for all team members (LDCG for all): 10

    Communication Preferences summary for all team members (CP for all): 10

    Team roles for all for all 4 Team assignment weeks: 13

    Creativity in Team deliverable/product: 10%. 6/65. PSYC305 – Communication & Power – Its Use and Misuse Discussion Essay Assignment Papers

    Individual Participation in Team discussions (at least 4 times fair contribution): 40%. 26/65

    Submissions Due

    In addition to the individual information (LDCG and CP), to be shared in Week 1 in Team Discussions by team members (see Instructions under Task and Deliverables above), team assignment deliverable/product (LDCG summary, CP summary, and Team Roles as ONE document) must be submitted in three places: at the end of the Team discussions by the Team Leader, in the Files section of the Course Menu by the leader, and in your own areas by each team member. PSYC305 – Communication & Power – Its Use and Misuse Discussion Essay Assignment Papers

    Team assignment deliverable / product must be submitted as one submission for grades, 
    the same final document by each member of the team
    , by the end of Week 2 (Sunday 11:59pm) in your own areas.

    Team Leader and Member Report (TLMR), available in the Files section of the Course Menu, must be posted by each member in the Team discussions between Friday and Saturday 11:59pm, and in their own Team Assignment area along with their Team assignment deliverable/ product. PSYC305 – Communication & Power – Its Use and Misuse Discussion Essay Assignment Papers

  • Scope of Practice, Credentialing, and Negotiation

    Scope of Practice, Credentialing, and Negotiation

    In this course, some Discussions will have two parts:

    Part I will consist of a specific topic related to the week’s content.

    Part II will consist of a pharmacology review of approximately 250 words. Please submit each posting separately but within the same Discussion thread.

    You will be assessed on your posting and responses to both parts.

    ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW

    As medical care evolves, so does the role and scope of practice of the advanced practice nurse in acute care settings. When providing patient care, however, you, as an advanced practice nurse, must always ensure that you are working within the scope of practice outlined by your state’s laws and institution’s regulations. For this Discussion, you examine these laws and regulations and consider how they might affect your future clinical practice, consider the credentialing process for your area, and discuss negotiation techniques you may use in a job search.

    To prepare:

    Locate a collaborative practice agreement. Based on this agreement, consider the scope of practice of an advanced practice nurse in your state.

    Locate and select at least two hospitals where you would be interested in working at once you obtain your licensure.

    Locate the hospitals’ credentialing documents and investigate the scope of practice at each hospital.

    Note:
     All hospitals do not have the same scope of practice even if they are located within the same city and state.

    Consider how the laws and regulations of the state and hospitals might affect your practice with medical and surgical patients in acute care settings.

    Think about how you would negotiate your first Advanced Practice role. Consider issues such as salary range, Continueing Medical Education (CME), license and DEA costs, insurance, hours, on call requirements, etc.

    By Day 3

    Post
     an explanation of the scope of practice of advanced practice nurses, as outlined in the collaborative practice agreement. Then, identify the two hospitals of interest that you selected. Based on the credentialing documents, explain the scope of practice for acute care advanced practice nurses at each hospital. Explain how this might affect your practice in terms of caring for medical and surgical patients in acute care settings (i.e., medical treatments, procedures you can perform, interpreting diagnostics, etc.). Finally, describe job negotiation considerations.

    Note:
     To support your Discussion post, you must include references (with URL links) from the state and the hospitals you selected.

    Read
     a selection of your colleagues’ responses.

    By Day 6

    Respond
     to at least 
    two
     of 
    your colleagues on 2 different days
     who selected a different state or hospital from yours. Share additional insights or alternative perspectives.

    Discussion Part II: Pharmacology

    Note:
     To access this week’s required library resources, please click on the link to the Course Readings List, found in the 
    Course Materials
     section of your Syllabus.

    To prepare:

    Read the following articles to enhance your knowledge of commonly prescribed medications:

    Chalikonda, S. A. (2009). Alpha2-adrenergic agonists and their role in the prevention of perioperative adverse cardiac events.
    AANA Journal, 77
    (2), 103–108.

    Note:
    Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.

    Frankenstein, L., Katus, H. A., Grundtvig, M., Hole, T., de Blois, J., Schellberg, D., … Agewall, S. (2013). Association between spironolactone added to beta-blockers and ACE inhibition and survival in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction: A propensity score-matched cohort study.
    European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 69
    (10), 1747–1755.

    Note:
    Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.

    Hao, G., Wang, Z., Guo, R., Chen, Z., Wang, X., Zhang, L., & Li, W. (2014). Effects of ACEI/ARB in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.
    BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 14
    , 148.

    Note:
    Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.

    Levy, P. D., Laribi, S., & Mebazaa, A. (2014). Vasodilators in acute heart failure: Review of the latest studies.
    Current Emergency and Hospital Medicine Reports, 2
    (2), 126–132.

    Vasodilators in acute heart failure: Review of the latest studies by Levy, P. D., Laribi, S., & Mebazaa, A. in Current Emergency and Hospital Medicine Reports, 2(2). Copyright 2014 by Current Science, Inc. Reprinted by permission of Current Science, Inc., via the Copyright Clearance Center.

    Shi, C. (2013). Blood pressure lowering efficacy of alpha blockers for primary hypertension.
    International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 11
    (3), 204–205.

    Note:
    Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.

    Tocci, G., Battistoni, A., Passerini, J., Musumeci, M. B., Francia, P., Ferrucci, A., & Volpe, M. (2015). Calcium channel blockers and hypertension.
    Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 20
    (2), 121–130.

    Note:
    Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.

    Toppen, W., Sareh, S., Satou, N., Shemin, R., Hunter, C., Buch, E., & Benharash, P. (2014). Do preoperative β-blockers improve postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery? Challenging societal guidelines.
    American Surgeon, 80
    (10), 1018–1021.

    Note:
    Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.

    Wang, A. (2012). Efficacy of class III antiarrhythmics and magnesium combination therapy for atrial fibrillation.
    Pharmacy Practice, 10
    (2), 65–71.

    Note:
    Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.

    All of the following groups of medications are commonly prescribed in the acute care setting. Choose one of the topics below to discuss. If it is a medication group, select a specific drug within that group. (This is a good way to prepare for clinical practice, because you will get to know the drugs you will prescribe for patients.). Focus your discussion on the hospital or ICU setting and IV usage.

    Alpha agonists

    Alpha blockers

    Beta blockers

    Antiarrhythmics

    Calcium channel

    Vasodilators

    ACE versus BBlocker with spironolactone in CHF

    ACE versus ARB

    Note:
     When sharing your initial post, select a topic that has not yet been discussed. If all topics have been discussed, then you may select that topic again, but select a different drug within the medication group.

    By Day 3

    For this Discussion, address 1 of the following options:

    Option 1

    Post
     a description of a patient you have taken care of (inpatient as an RN, or as an NP student) who has been prescribed the medication you selected. Include the scenario, indication, dosing, complications, and outcome. Then explain whether or not you would have ordered the same drug and same dose. Scope of Practice, Credentialing, and Negotiation

    Option 2

    Conduct an evidence-based drug search on the drug you selected and 
    post
     an explanation of any possible issues. Are there any drug interactions? Any black box warnings? To what type of patient would you prescribe this medication?

    Option 3

    Post
     an explanation of the properties of the drug you selected, including usages and dosing in the hospital or ICU. Describe a patient to whom you would prescribe this medication.

    Note:
     To be considered as one of your required responses, your pharmacology rationale must include a supporting reference.

    Note:
     For this Discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the “Post to Discussion Question” link and then select “Create Thread” to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click on Submit, you cannot delete or edit your own posts, and you cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking on Submit!

    Scope of Practice, Credentialing, and Negotiation

    Discussion_Rubric

     

    Outstanding Performance

    Excellent Performance

    Competent Performance

    Proficient Performance

    Room for Improvement

    Main Posting:

    Response to the discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

    44 
    (44%)
     – 44 
    (44%)

    Thoroughly responds to the discussion question(s)

    is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

    supported by at least 3 current, credible sources

    40 
    (40%)
     – 43 
    (43%)

    Responds to the discussion question(s)

    is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

    75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth

    supported by at least 3 credible references

    35 
    (35%)
     – 39 
    (39%)

    Responds to most of the discussion question(s)

    is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

    50% of post has exceptional depth and breadth

    supported by at least 3 credible references

    31 
    (31%)
     – 34 
    (34%)

    Responds to some of the discussion question(s)

    one to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed

    is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis

    somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

    post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references

    0 
    (0%)
     – 30 
    (30%)

    Does not respond to the discussion question(s)

    lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria

    lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis

    does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

    contains only 1 or no credible references

    Main Posting:

    Writing

    6 
    (6%)
     – 6 
    (6%)

    Written clearly and concisely

    Contains no grammatical or spelling errors

    Fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style

    5.5 
    (5.5%)
     – 5.5 
    (5.5%)

    Written clearly and concisely

    May contain one or no grammatical or spelling error

    Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style

    5 
    (5%)
     – 5 
    (5%)

    Written concisely

    May contain one to two grammatical or spelling error

    Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style

    4.5 
    (4.5%)
     – 4.5 
    (4.5%)

    Written somewhat concisely

    May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors

    Contains some APA formatting errors

    0 
    (0%)
     – 4 
    (4%)

    Not written clearly or concisely

    Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors

    Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style

    Main Posting:

    Timely and full participation

    10 
    (10%)
     – 10 
    (10%)

    Meets requirements for timely and full participation

    posts main discussion by due date

    0 
    (0%)
     – 0 
    (0%)

    NA

    0 
    (0%)
     – 0 
    (0%)

    NA

    0 
    (0%)
     – 0 
    (0%)

    NA

    0 
    (0%)
     – 0 
    (0%)

    Does not meet requirement for full participation

    First Response:

    Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.

    9 
    (9%)
     – 9 
    (9%)

    Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings

    responds to questions posed by faculty

    the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives

    8.5 
    (8.5%)
     – 8.5 
    (8.5%)

    Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings

    7.5 
    (7.5%)
     – 8 
    (8%)

    Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting

    6.5 
    (6.5%)
     – 7 
    (7%)

    Response is on topic, may have some depth

    0 
    (0%)
     – 6 
    (6%)

    Response may not be on topic, lacks depth. Scope of Practice, Credentialing, and Negotiation

    First Response:

    Writing

    6 
    (6%)
     – 6 
    (6%)

    Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues

    Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed

    Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources

    Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

    5.5 
    (5.5%)
     – 5.5 
    (5.5%)

    Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues

    Response to faculty questions are answered if posed

    Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources

    Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

    5 
    (5%)
     – 5 
    (5%)

    Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues

    Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed

    Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources

    Response is written in Standard Edited English

    4.5 
    (4.5%)
     – 4.5 
    (4.5%)

    Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication

    Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed

    Few or no credible sources are cited

    0 
    (0%)
     – 4 
    (4%)

    Responses posted in the discussion lack effective

    Response to faculty questions are missing

    No credible sources are cited

    First Response:

    Timely and full participation

    5 
    (5%)
     – 5 
    (5%)

    Meets requirements for timely and full participation

    posts by due date

    0 
    (0%)
     – 0 
    (0%)

    NA

    0 
    (0%)
     – 0 
    (0%)

    NA

    0 
    (0%)
     – 0 
    (0%)

    NA

    0 
    (0%)
     – 0 
    (0%)

    Does not meet requirement for full participation

    Second Response:

    Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.

    9 
    (9%)
     – 9 
    (9%)

    Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings * responds to questions posed by faculty

    the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives

    8.5 
    (8.5%)
     – 8.5 
    (8.5%)

    Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings

    7.5 
    (7.5%)
     – 8 
    (8%)

    Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting

    6.5 
    (6.5%)
     – 7 
    (7%)

    Response is on topic, may have some depth

    0 
    (0%)
     – 6 
    (6%)

    Response may not be on topic, lacks depth

    Second Response:

    Writing

    6 
    (6%)
     – 6 
    (6%)

    Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues

    Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed

    Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources

    Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

    5.5 
    (5.5%)
     – 5.5 
    (5.5%)

    Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues

    Response to faculty questions are answered if posed

    Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources

    Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

    5 
    (5%)
     – 5 
    (5%)

    Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues

    Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed

    Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources

    Response is written in Standard Edited English

    4.5 
    (4.5%)
     – 4.5 
    (4.5%)

    Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication

    Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed

    Few or no credible sources are cited

    0 
    (0%)
     – 4 
    (4%)

    Responses posted in the discussion lack effective

    Response to faculty questions are missing

    No credible sources are cited

    Second Response:

    Timely and full participation

    5 
    (5%)
     – 5 
    (5%)

    Meets requirements for timely and full participation

    Posts by due date

    0 
    (0%)
     – 0 
    (0%)

    NA

    0 
    (0%)
     – 0 
    (0%)

    NA

    0 
    (0%)
     – 0 
    (0%)

    NA

    0 
    (0%)
     – 0 
    (0%)

    Does not meet requirement for full participation. Scope of Practice, Credentialing, and Negotiation

  • Charismatic Leaders and Communication, Ohio State and Michigan Studies & McFarlane Case: Toying with Success: The McFarlane Companies

    Charismatic Leaders and Communication, Ohio State and Michigan Studies & McFarlane Case: Toying with Success: The McFarlane Companies

    Charismatic Leaders and Communication

    Do you think communication is more important to leaders now than it was in Hitler’s and FDR’s time? Explain why you think so or why you disagree. Who is a more current charismatic leader that you know of, and how are they similar to Hitler or FDR in their communication style?

    Charismatic Leaders and Communication, Ohio State and Michigan Studies & McFarlane Case: Toying with Success: The McFarlane Companies

    Individual assignment: McFarlane Case, p. 65 (Manning & Curtis): “Part One Video Case, Toying with Success: The McFarlane Companies”

    After reading the case, answer “Questions for Discussion” 1 and 2, providing evidence for points you make.

    Then, include a well thought-out and reflective 6 to 10-line personal conclusion.

    ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW

    Submit your assignment AS A MICROSOFT WORD DOCUMENT.

    Rubric (professor has the discretion to award points as deemed reasonable):

    Complete, well thought-out responses tapping into required content, arguments well presented, all parts responded to adequately, no significant errors – 40/40

    Many points made, but some connection to content missing, one part not answered, not complete discussion- 34/40

    Some points made, but some connection to content missing, incomplete and/or limited discussion – 26/40

    Limited discussion, limited points – 18/40

    Poor in every way – 5-10/40

    For grammatical and spelling errors, student may lose additional points

    Charismatic Leaders and Communication, Ohio State and Michigan Studies & McFarlane Case: Toying with Success: The McFarlane Companies

    Ohio State and Michigan Studies

    Consider the findings from the Ohio State and Michigan studies: Good leadership requires effectiveness on two dimensions – initiating structure, commonly called task orientation, and showing consideration, commonly called employee orientation. Evaluate a leader you know using those two dimensions of good leadership. Describe how well that leader manages both those dimensions. What is the outcome of their strengths or weaknesses in those dimensions?

    1. Describe a situation that would call for a more task oriented leader. 

    2. In what situations would a more employee oriented leader be more successful? 

    Which orientation do you reflect in your style of leadership? Why do you tend to lean toward that style?

    Charismatic Leaders and Communication, Ohio State and Michigan Studies & McFarlane Case: Toying with Success: The McFarlane Companies

    Team Assignment 1 (to be started Week 1, completed and due Week 2)

    Please read the document “Team Assignments Approach and Overview” located in the Introduction & Resources area for an overview of approach and requirements for Team Assignments, and the following detailed instructions for Team Assignment 1 to be started in Week 1, and completed in Week 2.

    As you know, to develop leadership skills, hands-on in this course, you are being put in virtual teams of 4. With your team members, you will complete 4 team assignments, one in each of weeks 2, 3, 5, and 6. You will do this by each team member having the opportunity to be the Leader in at least one of the Team Assignments (while others take on other specific roles that week).

    Objectives of Team Assignment 1

    To become aware of your leadership qualities, where and how they were developed, areas that need development, and how you could start developing your leadership qualities; and

    In order to work together virtually, you will share information with your team about how and when you are available for communication, and your leadership and course goals as stated in 1) above.

    Tasks and Deliverables for Team Assignment 1

    Instructions:
     Team Assignment 1 requires you to

    Get started in Week 1 to

    individually, analyze your leadership strengths, and areas to develop and improve, based on the personal Leadership development and Course goals document (LDCG) in the Files section of the Course Menu,

    indicate your program, experience with online courses, day and time availability, contact information (phone, chat, e-mail address), and time zones, etc… using the Communication Preferences (CP) document in the Files section of the Course Menu, and

    communicate and share the above information in LDCG and CP documents, with your team members, by posting in Team Discussions.

    Continue in week 2 to

    share the above information with each other,

    as a team, using the above information, plan out team roles such as leader, motivator, communicator, facilitator, etc…, for all team members, for all 4 team assignment weeks 2, 3, 5 and 6, as suggested in Team Roles document in the Files section of the Course Menu, and

    collate all team members’ Leadership Development and Course goals and Communication Preferences information with Team roles, in ONE Word document. You may create a table in Word, or an Excel worksheet to represent the information on Leadership and Course Goals (LDCG) summary and Communication Preferences (CP) summary, and submit with the Team Roles information, all in ONE Word document.

    Team assignment deliverable must be submitted in three places- at the end of the Team discussions by Team Leader, in the Files section of the Course Menu by the leader, and in your own Week 2 Team Assignment area by each team member.

    To ensure productivity by each member of your team, a Team Leader and Member Report (TLMR), available in the Files section of the Course Menu, will be completed by each member of the team and posted by each member in the Team discussions between Friday and Saturday midnight, and in their own Team Assignment area along with their Team assignment deliverable/ product by Sunday 11:59pm.If the TLMR is not posted in Team discussions and own area by Sunday 11:59pm, up to 20% points may be deducted from the full points of the Team assignment.

    Rubric

    In general, for the weekly Team Assignment, marks will be given on the following basis:

    Quality of 
    Team
     deliverable/ Product: 50%

    Creativity in 
    Team
     deliverable/product: 10%

    Individual
     Participation: 40%

    For Team Assignment 1 (due Week 2), 65 points will be awarded.

    Quality of Team deliverable/ Product: 50%. 33/65

    Leadership Development and Course Goals summary for all team members (LDCG for all): 10

    Communication Preferences summary for all team members (CP for all): 10

    Team roles for all for all 4 Team assignment weeks: 13

    Creativity in Team deliverable/product: 10%. 6/65

    Individual Participation in Team discussions (at least 4 times fair contribution): 40%. 26/65

    Submissions Due

    Don’t forget to submit your assignment.

    Charismatic Leaders and Communication, Ohio State and Michigan Studies & McFarlane Case: Toying with Success: The McFarlane Companies

  • Conditions of the Cardiovascular System Essay Assignment Papers

    Conditions of the Cardiovascular System Essay Assignment Papers

    Jeff Cole was hospitalized at age 60 for cardiomyopathy with congestive heart failure. As a result of a timely evaluation and diagnosis, Cole had a more positive health outcome than the majority of other patients with his condition. By working closely with Cole to develop a personalized treatment plan, his health care provider was also able to improve his long-term prognosis (St. Anthony’s Medical Center, 2014).

    After the initial recovery, patients like Cole often struggle to adhere to treatment plans. However, by collaborating with patients and developing regimes that consider their lifestyle needs, you can help improve health outcomes for patients with cardiovascular conditions.

    ORDER A CUSTOM-WRITTEN PAPER NOW

    This week, as you explore the etiology and clinical presentations of cardiovascular conditions in acute care settings, you will examine strategies for assessing, diagnosing, and treating patients with cardiovascular conditions.

    Learning Objectives

    By the end of this week, students will:

    Evaluate patients with cardiovascular conditions

    Develop differential diagnoses for patients with cardiovascular conditions

    Develop treatment plans for patients with cardiovascular conditions

    Photo Credit: thelinke/E+/Getty Images

    Learning Resources

    Required Readings

    Colyar, M. R. (2015).
    Advanced practice nursing procedures
    . Philadelphia, PA: F.A. Davis Company.

     

    Section 6, “Cardiovascular Procedures”

    Chapter 89, “Doppler Technique”

    Chapter 90, “Electrocardiogram (ECG) Interpretation”

    Chapter 91, “Electrocardiogram (ECG) Lead Placement”

    Chapter 92, “Holter Monitor Application: Continuous 24-Hour Ambulatory Cardiac Monitoring”

    Chapter 93, “Stress Testing”

    Chapter 96, “Blood Culture Specimen Collection”

    Chapter 97, “Capillary Blood Collection: Heel/Finger Stick”

    Chapter 99, Defibrillation: Unna’s Boot Application”

    Chapter 100, “Venipuncture”

    Papadakis, M. A., McPhee, S. J., & Rabow, M. W. (2018).
    Current medical diagnosis & treatment
    (57th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.

     

    Chapter 10, “Heart Disease” (pp. 328-446)

    Chapter 11, “Systemic Hypertension” (pp. 447-478)

    Chapter 12, “Blood Vessel & Lymphatic Disorders” (pp. 479-506)

    Chapter 28, “Lipid Disorders” (pp. 1269-1277)

    Weber, E. C., Vilensky, J. A., & Fog, A. M. (2013).
    Practical radiology: A symptom-based approach
    . Philadelphia, PA: F.A. Davis Company.

     

    Chapter 6, “Chest” (pp. 125–149)

    American Heart Association. (2013).
    Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
    . Retrieved from http://www.heart.org/HEARTORG/Conditions/More/Cardiomyopathy/Hypertrophic-Cardiomyopathy_UCM_444317_Article.jsp

    Duvvuir, P., & Moghekar, A. (2014).
    Bedside applications of ultrasound
    . Retrieved from http://www.clevelandclinicmeded.com/medicalpubs/diseasemanagement/pulmonary/bedside-applications-of-ultrasound/

    SkillStat Learning Inc. (2014).
    The 6 second ECG
    . Retrieved from http://www.skillstat.com/tools/ecg-simulator#/-home. Conditions of the Cardiovascular System Essay Assignment Papers

    University of Virginia. (2013g).
    Interpretation of the ICU chest radiograph
    . Retrieved from http://www.med-ed.virginia.edu/courses/rad/chest/index.html

    University of Virginia. (2013j).
    Introduction to conventional cardiac radiography
    . Retrieved from http://www.med-ed.virginia.edu/courses/rad/cardiacplain/

    Required Media

    i-Human Patient Cases
    . (2014). Retrieved from https://ih2.i-human.com/users/sign_in

    Optional Resources

    Dubin, D. (2000). Personal quick reference sheets. In
    Rapid interpretation of EKG’s
    (pp. 333–346). Tampa, FL: Cover Publishing Co. Retrieved from http://tmedweb.tulane.edu/portal/files/open-access/clinical-diagnosis/ekg_reference_sheets.pdf

    Godara, H., Hirbe, A., Nassif, M., Otepka, H., & Rosenstock, A. (2014).
    The Washington manual of medical therapeutics
    (34th ed.). Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

    Sullivan, D. D. (2012).
    Guide to clinical documentation
    (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: F.A. Davis.

    Yale University. (1999a).
    Atlas of echocardiography: Coronal section through chest
    .

    Yale University. (1999b).
    Atlas of echocardiography: Left parasternal long axis view
    .

    Yale University. (1999c).
    Atlas of echocardiography: Normal function
    .

    Yale University. (1999d).
    Atlas of echocardiography: Radiography of the heart
    .

    Assignment: Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Conditions of the Cardiovascular System

    Cardiovascular conditions are among the leading causes of hospitalization, and they are of particular importance because they often require immediate medical responses. This makes it essential that you not only be able to identify quickly signs and symptoms of these conditions but also be fluent in current evidence-based treatment guidelines. For this Assignment, as you examine this week’s i-Human patient case study, consider how you might evaluate and treat patients who present with cardiovascular conditions. Conditions of the Cardiovascular System Essay Assignment Papers

    To prepare:

    Review this week’s Learning Resources. Consider how to assess, diagnose, and treat conditions of the cardiovascular system.

    Review this week’s i-Human case study. Based on the patient information provided, think about the health history you would need to collect from each patient

    Consider what physical exams and diagnostic tests would be appropriate to help you gather more information about the patient’s condition. Reflect on how the results would be used to make a diagnosis.

    Identify three to five possible conditions to consider in a differential diagnosis for the patient.

    Consider the patient’s diagnosis. Think about clinical guidelines that might support this diagnosis.

    Reflect on a treatment plan for the patient that includes health promotion and patient education strategies.

    To complete:

    As you interact with this week’s i-Human patient, complete the assigned case study. For guidance on using i-Human, refer to the 
    i-Human Patients Case Player Student Manual
     in the Week 1 Learning Resources.

    By Day 7

    This Assignment is due.

    Submission and Grading Information

    Week 4 Assignment Rubric

    Practicum Reminder: Week 4 Time Log

    Time Logs

    You are required to keep a log of the time you spend related to your practicum experience 
    and enter every patient you see each day.
     You can access your time log from the Welcome Page in your Meditrek account. You will track time individually for each patient you work with. Please make sure to continuously input your hours throughout the term.

    Conditions of the Cardiovascular System Essay Assignment Papers

  • Employee Needs. Happy Employees – common, or scarce?

    Employee Needs. Happy Employees – common, or scarce?

    Employee Needs

    Please take a look at the bulleted needs described on page 286: survival, security, belonging, respect, and fulfillment. Then, describe how your organization meets those needs, and explain what they could do differently to better meet the fulfillment needs.

    Employee Needs. Happy Employees – common, or scarce?

    Happy Employees – common, or scarce?

    ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW

     
    To kick off this discussion, remember what we were discussing this week about happy employees. Our lecture talked about making employees number one. How prevalent do you find this to be? Do you think it is common? Why or why not? Is it a lack of knowledge, ignorance, or arrogance? You would think that this concept was easy to understand. Do you think today’s managers and leaders forgot to read the handbook on effective employee management? 
    Employee Needs. Happy Employees – common, or scarce?

  • Manage Team Diversity and Avoid Groupthink Discussion Assignment Paper

    Manage Team Diversity and Avoid Groupthink Discussion Assignment Paper

    Manage Team Diversity and Avoid Groupthink

    Our text discusses the conclusion of research: Diverse teams utilize diverse opinions and approaches and are generally more effective in their accomplishment of tasks. Yet, the text states “diversity appears to increase group conflict.”

    In what ways does diversity make conflict into a positive result? How can the appreciation and encouragement of people to be themselves and share their thoughts result in cohesiveness and effectiveness?

    What are some specific things you could do or say in any group to decrease the conflict inherent in diversity and increase the productivity inherent in many minds and styles working together?

    ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW

    How does dealing with diversity in teams help in avoiding groupthink? Think about the forces of groupthink and how they can be dealt with when diversity of opinions, ideas, strategies, is allowed to function in teams. Manage Team Diversity and Avoid Groupthink Discussion Assignment Paper

    rganizational Climate: Warm and Open, or Chilly with a Chance of Rain?

     
    As stated in Chapter 5, organizational climate is the hallmark of integrated purpose, strong focus on the advancement of the individual, and respect for all members. Discuss any situations you have encountered in your vocational experiences where this cohesiveness was evident. How did you feel? How do you think this climate affected turnover? Manage Team Diversity and Avoid Groupthink Discussion Assignment Paper

    If you have not experienced this type of corporation, what kinds of expectations would you have when you join it? How do you think the employees feel about their situation? Manage Team Diversity and Avoid Groupthink Discussion Assignment Paper

     Team Assignment 3

     Objectives of Team Assignment 3

    to continue to work in your team with a new leader and members in other roles, all that were specified in Week 2 assignment, for Week 5, and

    to participate fully in completing a PowerPoint based on research conducted by your team on the phenomenon of groupthink and at least 3 scenarios/examples in which groupthink has had significant negative consequence.

    Tasks and Deliverables

    Read the section on “Avoiding groupthink” in the Manning and Curtis book, pp. 256–258. With your team, investigate multiple examples of groupthink and present information about the phenomenon and at least 3 scenarios / examples (other than the Space Shuttle Challenger Disaster) in a PowerPoint presentation. Your presentation must cover examples/ scenarios in which groupthink has had a significant consequence. Manage Team Diversity and Avoid Groupthink Discussion Assignment Paper

    PowerPoint advice
    : Every slide should have clear, readable text no smaller than 28 point font; remember to limit your use of full sentences. Each slide should also have some kind of visual to enhance the communication of that content. Using APA guidelines cite your sources, including in-text citations. The professional team product includes an introduction, multiple content slides, and a conclusion, as well as a reference slide. Better products usually have about 15 to 20 slides (four or five from each student). You may need more for more complex products. More detailed guidelines on presentation techniques is provided in a document “PowerPoint dos and don’ts” in the Files section of the Course Menu. Manage Team Diversity and Avoid Groupthink Discussion Assignment Paper

    Submit your team assignment deliverable/product to the team discussion, Files section of the Course Menu for all to see, and to the Team Assignment area. The presentation is posted in the team discussions so that you can all work on it, and the team leader or designee should post a final copy in the Files section of the Course Menu so other teams can see it. 
    Each participating team member should post the same final copy in his or her own Team Assignment area
     
    so that it can be graded
    .

    Remember to post the TLMR (Team Leader and Member Report) in Team discussions, and in your own area along with the deliverable/ product (PowerPoint).

    In-class students must be ready to present your product to the class at the beginning of next week’s class.

    Don’t forget to submit your assignment. Manage Team Diversity and Avoid Groupthink Discussion Assignment Paper

    Rubric

    For Team Assignments 2, 3, and 4, marks will be given on the following basis:

    Quality of Team deliverable/ Product: 40%

    Creativity in Team deliverable/product: 20%

    Participation: 40%

    For Team Assignment 3 (due Week 5), 55 points will be awarded as follows:

    Quality of Team deliverable/ Product: 40%. 
    22/55

    Accuracy and completeness of Content (Groupthink, symptoms, other conditions, outcomes, isolation of forces of groupthink, at least 3 scenarios)– 10/22

    Format – number of slides, consistent appropriate font and size, cover, intro, conclusion slides, not too crowded, more bullets than paragraphs, professional looking – 6/22. Manage Team Diversity and Avoid Groupthink Discussion Assignment Paper

    Bibliography – APA Referencing style, at least 1 good reference – per member – 6/22

    Creativity in Team deliverable/product: 20%.
     11/55

    Presentation style, format, content, … looks professional, not over-fancy

    Participation in Team discussions (at least 4 times fair contribution): 40%. 
    22/55

    Fair participation on at least 4 different days a week for the student to get a full mark. Manage Team Diversity and Avoid Groupthink Discussion Assignment Paper

  • Part Five Video Case – Hot Topic: Employees with Passion Assignment Paper

    Part Five Video Case – Hot Topic: Employees with Passion Assignment Paper

    Read the case study “Part Five Video Case—Hot Topic: Employees with Passion” on p. 281 of your textbook and answer the ‘Questions for Discussion’ 1 and 2, providing evidence for points you make. For full points, ensure substantive responses to the questions. See rubric below for criteria for full points.

    ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW

    Don’t forget to submit your assignment. Part Five Video Case – Hot Topic: Employees with Passion Assignment Paper

    Rubric (professor has the discretion to change award points as deemed reasonable)

    Complete, well thought-out answer tapping into required content, arguments well presented, all parts responded to adequately, no significant errors  – 40/40

    Many points made, but some connection to content missing, one part not answered, not complete discussion- 34/40

    Some points made, but some connection to content missing, incomplete and/or limited discussion – 26/40

    Limited discussion, limited points – 18/40

    Poor in every way  – 5-10/40. For grammatical and spelling errors, student may lose additional points.

  • Team Leader and Member Report – Manning and Curtis PowerPoint on an enlightened organization

    Team Leader and Member Report – Manning and Curtis PowerPoint on an enlightened organization

    Team Assignment 4

    Objectives of Team Assignment 4

    1) to continue to work in your team with a new leader and members in other roles, as specified in week 2 assignment, for week 6, and

    2) to participate fully in completing a PowerPoint on an enlightened organization, as described on p. 87- 91 in Manning and Curtis, by assessing its organizational climate and highlighting characteristics of loyalty, consideration for others, motivation, communication, and leadership in that organization.

    ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW

    Tasks and Deliverables

    Each team: Find an organization that has an enlightened organizational culture, as described on p. 87- 91 in our Manning-Curtis book. Research their culture and climate via the Web or other resources, and create a PowerPoint presentation, based on the Organizational Climate assessment and highlighting the characteristics of loyalty, consideration for others, motivation, communication, and leadership in that organization. Some examples for you to consider include: SAS, Google, Nugget Markets, and World Famous Pike Place Fish Market. There are many others, so have fun exploring the world of exceptional organizations and their enlightened culture. Team Leader and Member Report – Manning and Curtis PowerPoint on an enlightened organization

    PowerPoint advice
    . Every slide should have clear, readable text no smaller than 28 point font; remember to limit your use of full sentences. Each slide should also have some kind of visual to enhance the communication of that content. Using APA guidelines cite your sources, including in-text citations. The professional team product includes an introduction, multiple content slides, and a conclusion, as well as a reference slide. Better products usually have about 15 to 20 slides (four or five from each student). You may need more for more complex products. More detailed guidelines on presentation techniques is provided in a document “PowerPoint dos and don’ts” in the Files section of the Course Menu. Team Leader and Member Report – Manning and Curtis PowerPoint on an enlightened organization.

    Submit your team assignment deliverable/product to the team discussion, Files section of the Course Menu for all to see, and to the Team Assignment area. The presentation is posted in the team discussions so that you can all work on it, and the team leader or designee should post a final copy in the Files section of the Course Menu so other teams can see it. 
    Each participating team member should post the same final copy in his or her own Week 6 Team Assignment area so that it can be graded
    .

    Remember to post the TLMR (Team Leader and Member Report) in Team discussions, and in your own area along with the deliverable/ product (PowerPoint). Team Leader and Member Report – Manning and Curtis PowerPoint on an enlightened organization.

    In-class students must be ready to present your product to the class at the beginning of next week’s class.

    Don’t forget to submit your assignment. Team Leader and Member Report – Manning and Curtis PowerPoint on an enlightened organization.

    Rubric

    For Team Assignments 2, 3, and 4, marks will be given on the following basis:

    Quality of Team deliverable/ Product: 40%

    Creativity in Team deliverable/product: 20%

    Participation: 40%

    For Team Assignment 4 (due Week 6), 55 points will be awarded as follows:

    Quality of Team deliverable/ Product: 40%. 
    22/55

    Accuracy and completeness of Content (Organizational climate assessment, characteristics of loyalty, consideration for others, motivation, communication, and leadership)–
     10/22

    Format – number of slides, consistent appropriate font and size, cover, intro, conclusion slides, not too crowded, more bullets than paragraphs, professional looking – 
    6/22

    Bibliography – APA Referencing style, at least 1 good reference – per member –
     6/22

    Creativity in Team deliverable/product: 20%.
     11/55

    Presentation style, format, content, … looks professional, not over-fancy

    Participation in Team discussions (at least 4 times fair contribution): 40%. 
    22/55

    Fair participation on at least 4 different days a week for the student to get a full mark. Team Leader and Member Report – Manning and Curtis PowerPoint on an enlightened organization

  • PSYC 305 – Stress and Burnout Prevention & Successful Change Management Essay Assignment Papers

    PSYC 305 – Stress and Burnout Prevention & Successful Change Management Essay Assignment Papers

    Stress and Burnout Prevention

    What is burnout? Who gets burned-out? 

    Read the stories about Joe in “We Buried Joe Today” and the “A tragic story” about ambulance attendants on pages 432 and 433. Comment on the stories and similar ones you may have heard about. 
    PSYC 305 – Stress and Burnout Prevention & Successful Change Management Essay Assignment Papers

    ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW

    Successful Change Management

    Since change in the workplace is constant, a good leader knows how to implement and lead effective change. A description on p. 418 and 419 explains how change affects top management, middle management, and frontline employees. Read this section, and consider a time when you experienced change in your organization.

    Describe how people at those three levels in the organization initiated or responded to the change. Did top management help his or her middle managers prepare employees for and implement the change? Did management understand the “losses” experienced by employees? Were employees resistant to the change? How did management overcome that resistance? PSYC 305 – Stress and Burnout Prevention & Successful Change Management Essay Assignment Papers