Category: Nursing

  • Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients – Liver/Biliary Tract, Pancreas, and Spleen Essay Assignment Papers

    Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients – Liver/Biliary Tract, Pancreas, and Spleen Essay Assignment Papers

    Week 7: Assessment and Care of Patients With Conditions of the Liver/Biliary Tract, Pancreas, and Spleen

    Conditions related to the liver/biliary tract, pancreas, and spleen frequently are chronic in nature and difficult to diagnose. Although many of these conditions are manageable once diagnosed, they often have a tremendous impact on quality of life for patients. With chronic conditions such as these accounting for 81% of hospital admissions (Partnership to Fight Chronic Disease, n.d.), it is essential that you have a strong foundation in the various presentations and symptoms.

    ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW

    This week, as you examine the pre- and post-operative care of patients with conditions related to the liver/biliary tract, pancreas, and spleen, you explore strategies for assessment, diagnosis, and treatment.

    Learning Objectives

    By the end of this week, students will:

    Evaluate medical and surgical patients with conditions of the liver/biliary track, pancreas, and spleen

    Develop differential diagnoses for medical and surgical patients with conditions of the liver/biliary track, pancreas, and spleen. Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients – Liver/Biliary Tract, Pancreas, and Spleen Essay Assignment Papers

    Develop treatment plans for medical and surgical patients with conditions of the liver/biliary track, pancreas, and spleen

    Photo Credit: ericsphotography/E+/Getty Images

     Learning Resources

    Required Readings

    Doherty, G. M. (2015).
    Current diagnosis and treatment: Surgery
    (14th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.

    Chapter 24, “Liver & Portal Venous System”

    Chapter 25, “Biliary Tract”

    Chapter 26, “Pancreas”

    Chapter 27, “Spleen”

    Weber, E. C., Vilensky, J. A., & Fog, A. M. (2013).
    Practical radiology: A symptom-based approach.
    Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis Company. Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients – Liver/Biliary Tract, Pancreas, and Spleen Essay Assignment Papers

    Chapter 8, “Abdomen” (Review)

    Gay, S. B., Shaffer, H. A., Vu, Q. D. M., Harker, C. O., Kuzminski, C. D., Christensen, J. D., … Kori, G. A. (2013).
    Introduction to gastrointestinal radiology.
    Retrieved from https://www.med-ed.virginia.edu/courses/rad/gi/

    Required Media

    Geertsma, T. S. A. (n.d.).
    Abdomen and retroperitoneum.
    Retrieved from http://www.ultrasoundcases.info/Case-List.aspx?cat=158

    i-Human Patient Cases. (2014). Retrieved from https://ih2.i-human.com/users/sign_in

    Assignment: Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients – Liver/Biliary Tract, Pancreas, and Spleen

    The liver/biliary tract, pancreas, and spleen often are associated with chronic conditions, which may result in long-term symptoms for patients. Whereas some of these symptoms may be connected easily to a particular condition, many symptoms are associated with multiple conditions, making an immediate diagnosis challenging. For this Assignment, as you examine this week’s i-Human patient case study, consider how you might evaluate and treat pre- and post-operative patients who present with health conditions related to the liver/biliary tract, pancreas, and spleen. Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients – Liver/Biliary Tract, Pancreas, and Spleen Essay Assignment Papers

    To prepare:

    Review this week’s Learning Resources. With the liver/biliary track, pancreas, and spleen in mind, consider how to assess, diagnose, and treat patients in pre- and post-operative care.

    Review this week’s i-Human case study. Based on the patient information provided, think about the health history you would need to collect from the patient. Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients – Liver/Biliary Tract, Pancreas, and Spleen Essay Assignment Papers

    Consider what physical exams and diagnostic tests would be appropriate to gather more information about the patient’s condition. Reflect on how the results would be used to make a diagnosis.

    Identify three to five possible conditions to consider in a differential diagnosis for the patient.

    Consider the patient’s diagnosis. Think about clinical guidelines that might support this diagnosis. Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients – Liver/Biliary Tract, Pancreas, and Spleen Essay Assignment Papers

    Develop a treatment plan for the patient that includes health promotion and patient education strategies for medical and surgical patients with conditions of the liver/biliary tract, pancreas, and spleen.

    To complete:

    As you interact with this week’s i-Human patient, complete the assigned case study. For guidance on using i-Human, refer to the 
    i-Human Patients Case Player Student Manual
     in the Week 2 Learning Resources.

    By Day 7

    This Assignment is due.

    Grading Information

    Week 7 i-Human Rubric

    Practicum Reminder: Week 7 Time Log

    Time Logs

    You are required to keep a log of the time you spend related to your practicum experience 
    and enter every patient you see each day.
     You can access your time log from the Welcome Page in your Meditrek account. You will track time individually for each patient you work with. Please make sure to continuously input your hours throughout the term.

    Week in Review

    This week
     you evaluated medical and surgical patients with conditions related to the liver/biliary tract, pancreas, and spleen and developed differential diagnoses and treatment plans for these conditions. Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients – Liver/Biliary Tract, Pancreas, and Spleen Essay Assignment Papers

    Next week
     you will study the pre-and post-operative care of patients with conditions of the intestines, hernias, and abdominal wall lesions and explore strategies for assessment, diagnosis, and treatment.

    Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients – Liver/Biliary Tract, Pancreas, and Spleen Essay Assignment Papers. Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients – Liver/Biliary Tract, Pancreas, and Spleen Essay Assignment Papers

    Application_Rubric

     

    Novice

    Emerging

    Proficient

    HPI Statement

    0 
    (0%)
     – 5 
    (5%)

    Poorly written HPI statement. Incomplete ideas and sentences. Lacks basic history taking skills

    6 
    (6%)
     – 10 
    (10%)

    Well written HPI statement but may be missing 1-2 key components from the history

    11 
    (11%)
     – 15 
    (15%)

    Clearly written HPI statement with comprehensive information gathering from case questions.

    Objective testing and physical exam

    0 
    (0%)
     – 5 
    (5%)

    Poorly written physical examination. May be missing 3 or more key exam findings that are critical to patient’s diagnosis. Includes 3 or more inappropriate exams or tests.

    6 
    (6%)
     – 10 
    (10%)

    Well written physical examination but may be missing 1-2 key exam findings critical to patient’s diagnosis. May include 1-2 unnecessary exams or tests.

    11 
    (11%)
     – 15 
    (15%)

    Clearly written physical examination covering all critical components of a focus exam. Tests that are ordered are appropriate for patient and cost effective.

    Assessment

    0 
    (0%)
     – 10 
    (10%)

    Differential diagnosis list too brief and inconclusive. May be missing 3 or more critical components. Priority list may be out of order. Primary diagnosis may be wrong.

    11 
    (11%)
     – 19 
    (19%)

    Well written differential diagnoses. May be missing 1-2 critical components. Correct primary diagnosis identified.

    20 
    (20%)
     – 25 
    (25%)

    Clearly written differential diagnoses. Primary diagnosis identified.

    Plan for patient

    0 
    (0%)
     – 15 
    (15%)

    Poorly written plan. May be missing 3 or more key issues that are critical to patient’s diagnosis.

    16 
    (16%)
     – 25 
    (25%)

    Well written plan but may be missing 1-2 key issues critical to patient’s diagnosis.

    26 
    (26%)
     – 30 
    (30%)

    Clearly written plan covering all critical components for patient’s final diagnosis.

    Clinical Questions

    0 
    (0%)
     – 10 
    (10%)

    Correctly answered 0-69% of the clinical question

    11 
    (11%)
     – 13 
    (13%)

    Correctly answered 70-89% of the clinical question

    14 
    (14%)
     – 15 
    (15%)

    Correctly answered 90-100% of the clinical queries

    Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients – Liver/Biliary Tract, Pancreas, and Spleen Essay Assignment Papers

  • NURS 6560 – Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients Essay Assignment Papers

    NURS 6560 – Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients Essay Assignment Papers

    Week 2: Pre- and Post-Operative Care

    “A wide range of illnesses and injuries may require treatment that includes some type of surgical intervention. Surgery may be planned or unplanned, major or minor, invasive or noninvasive, and may involve any body part or system”

    —Pamela Lynn (2008).

    As this quotation suggests, advanced practice nurses must be able to provide pre- and post-operative care to patients with various illnesses and injuries. Consider a 17-year-old patient who is injured in a car accident. The patient has severe burns on her legs, and several toes on her right foot require amputation. Her injuries are affecting multiple body systems. As an advanced practice nurse, how might you stabilize and prepare this patient for surgery? What areas of care will be your focus as the patient recovers from surgery?

    This week, you examine and discuss limitations and challenges of clinical practice. Then, as you explore the role of the advanced practice nurse in perioperative settings, you examine strategies for assessing, diagnosing, and treating patients in pre- and post-operative care.

    Learning Objectives

    By the end of this week, students will:

    Analyze limitations and challenges of clinical practice

    Evaluate pre- and post-operative care patients

    Develop differential diagnoses for pre- and post-operative care patients

    Develop treatment plans for pre- and post-operative care patients

    Photo Credit: PhotoAlto/Odilon Dimier/PhotoAlto Agency RF Collections/Getty Images

    Learning Resources

    ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW

    Required Readings

    Colyar, M. R. (2015).
    Advanced practice nursing procedures
    (1st ed.). Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis Company.

    Chapter 1, “Punch Biopsy”

    Chapter 2, “Skin Biopsy”

    Chapter 4, “Abscesses—Incision and Drainage Drainage (Furuncle, Felon, Paronychia, Pilonidal Cyst, Perianal Cyst)”

    Chapter 7, “Burns—Debridement”

    Chapter 8, “Digital Nerve Block”

    Chapter 12, “Sebaceous Cyst Removal”

    Chapter 17, “Soft Tissue Aspiration”

    Chapter 21, “Subungual Hematoma Excision”

    Chapter 22, “Suture Insertion”

    Chapter 23, “Suture Selection”

    Chapter 24, “Suture Removal”

    Chapter 26, “Topical Hemostatic Agent Application”

    Chapter 27, “Ulcer Debridement”

    Doherty, G. M. (2015).
    Current diagnosis and treatment: Surgery
    (14th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill. NURS 6560 – Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients Essay Assignment Papers

    Chapter 6, “Wound Healing”

    Chapter 8, “Inflammation, Infection, & Antimicrobial Therapy in Surgery”

    Chapter 9, “Fluid & Electrolyte Management & Acid-Base Disorders”

    Chapter 10, “Surgical Metabolism & Nutrition”

    Chapter 13, “Management of the Injured Patient”

    Chapter 14, “Burns & Other Thermal Injuries”

    Document: i-Human Patients, Inc. (2014).
    i-Human patients case player student manual.

    Throughout this course, you will be required to complete case study assignments within i-Human Patients. This manual provides guidance on accessing and using these simulation. It is highly recommended that you explore the various training resources offered in this manual in preparation for the upcoming Assignments.Throughout this course, you will be required to complete case study assignments within i-Human Patients. This manual provides guidance on accessing and using these simulation. It is highly recommended that you explore the various training resources offered in this manual in preparation for the upcoming Assignments.

    Required Media

    Note:
     You should have received an e-mail with your i-Human Patients login and password information. If you have not received this information, please contact your Instructor.

    i-Human Patient Cases. (2014). Retrieved from https://ih2.i-human.com/users/sign_in

    Vo, H. (2012).
    Placement of central venous catheter—NEJM
    [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HE5QhsPRaPU

     

    Optional Resources

    University of Michigan Trauma Burn Center. (2015).
    Fluid resuscitation.
    Retrieved from http://www.traumaburn.org/referring/fluid.shtml

    U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. (2014).
    Burn triage and treatment: Thermal injuries.
    Retrieved from http://www.remm.nlm.gov/burns.htm

     

    Discussion Part I: Limitations and Challenges

    From providing ongoing assessments to monitoring for complications and facilitating recovery, advanced practice nurses who care for patients in perioperative environments experience a unique set of limitations and challenges. Reflecting on your experiences in this complex and critical environment will help you develop your professional competency and prepare you for your future role as an advanced practice nurse. In this week’s Discussion, you consider limitations and challenges of clinical practice in perioperative care settings. NURS 6560 – Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients Essay Assignment Papers

    To prepare:

    Reflect on this week’s clinical experiences.

    Consider one limitation or challenge you encountered.

    Think about how you overcame this limitation or challenge and how this might affect your future practice in pre- and post-operative care settings.

    By Day 3

    Post
     a description of at least one limitation or challenge you encountered during your clinical experience this week. Explain how you overcame this limitation or challenge and how this might affect your future practice.

    Note:
     If you refer to a patient in your Discussions or Assignments, be sure to use a pseudonym or other false form of identification. This is to ensure the privacy and protection of the patient. NURS 6560 – Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients Essay Assignment Papers

    Read
     a selection of your colleagues’ responses.

    By Day 6

    Respond
     to 
    two colleagues
     by sharing additional insights or alternative perspectives.

    Discussion Part II: Pharmacology

    Note:
     To access this week’s required library resources, please click on the link to the Course Readings List, found in the Course Materials section of your Syllabus.

    To prepare:

    Read the following articles to enhance your knowledge of commonly prescribed medications:

    Ando, S., Yasugi, D., Matsumoto, T., Kanata, S., & Kasai, K. (2014). Serious outcomes associated with overdose of medicines containing barbiturates for treatment of insomnia.
    Psychiatry Clinical Neuroscience, 68
    (9), 721.

    Serious outcomes associated with overdose of medicines containing barbiturates for treatment of insomnia by Ando, S., et al in Psychiatry Clinical Neuroscience, 68(9). Copyright 2014 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Reprinted by permission of John Wiley & Sons, Inc., via the Copyright Clearance Center.

     

    Dassanayake, T. L., Jones, A. L., Michie, P. T., Carter, G. L., McElduff, P., Stokes, B. J., & Whyte, I. M. (2012). Risk of road traffic accidents in patients discharged following treatment for psychotropic drug overdose: A self-controlled case series study in Australia.
    CNS Drugs 26
    (3), 269–276.

    Note:
    Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.

    Kulick, D., & Deen, D. (2011). Specialized nutrition support.
    American Family Physician, 83
    (2), 173–183. Retrieved from http://www.aafp.org/afp/2011/0115/p173.html

    Martini, D. I., Nacca, N., Haswell, D., Cobb, T., & Hodgman, M. (2015). Serotonin syndrome following metaxalone overdose and therapeutic use of a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor.
    Clinical Toxicology 53
    (3), 185–187.

    Serotonin syndrome following metaxalone overdose and therapeutic use of a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor by Martini, D., in Clinical Toxicology, 53(3). Copyright 2015 by Informa Healthcare. Reprinted by permission of Informa Healthcare via the Copyright Clearance Center.

     

    Robinson, A., & Wermeling, D. P. (2014). Intranasal naloxone administration for treatment of opioid overdose.
    American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 71
    (24), 2129–2135.

    Note:
    Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.

    Thomas, D. R. (2013). Total parenteral nutrition (TPN). In
    The Merck Manual Professional Edition.
    Retrieved from http://www.merckmanuals.com/professional/nutritional_disorders/nutritional_support/total_parenteral_

     

    All of the following groups of medications are commonly prescribed in the acute care setting. Choose one of the topics below to discuss. If it is a medication group, select a specific drug within that group. (This is a good way for you to prepare for clinical practice, because you will get to know the drugs you will prescribe for patients.). Focus your discussion on the hospital or ICU setting and IV usage.

    KPhos, bicarb, calcium, magnesium

    Iron, folic acid, B12

    Diamox

    Macrolides

    Muinolones/mluoroquinolone

    Cephalosporins, 4th and 5th generation

    Aminoglycosides

    Carbapenems

    Lipopeptide

    Tigecycline

    Note:
     When sharing your initial post, select a topic that has not yet been discussed. If all topics have been discussed, then you may select that topic again, but select a different drug within the medication group.

    By Day 3

    For this Discussion, address 1 of the following options:

    Option 1

    Post
     a description of a patient you have taken care of (inpatient as an RN, or as an NP student) who has been prescribed the medication you selected. Include the scenario, indication, dosing, complications, and outcome. Then explain whether or not you would have ordered the same drug and same dose.

    Option 2

    Conduct an evidence-based drug search on the drug you selected and 
    post
     an explanation of any possible issues. Are there any drug interactions? Any black box warnings? To what type of patient would you prescribe this medication?

    Option 3

    Post
     an explanation of the properties of the drug you selected, including usages and dosing in the hospital or ICU. Discuss a patient to whom you would prescribe this medication.

    Note:
     To be considered as one of your required responses, your pharmacology rationale must include a supporting reference.

    Note:
     For this Discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the “Post to Discussion Question” link and then select “Create Thread” to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click on Submit, you cannot delete or edit your own posts, and you cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking on Submit!

    Submission and Grading Information

    Grading Criteria

    Week 2 Discussion Rubric

    Assignment: Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients

    The perioperative period is critical for surgical patients. Whether patients require fluid and electrolyte management, pain management, or treatment for infections or surgical complications, advanced practice nurses must be able to provide safe and effective care. For this Assignment, as you examine this week’s i-Human patient case study, consider how you might evaluate and treat patients who require pre- and post-operative care.

    To prepare:

    Review this week’s Learning Resources. Consider how to assess, diagnose, and treat patients in pre- and post-operative care.

    Review this week’s i-Human case study. Based on the patient information provided, think about the health history you would need to collect from the patient.

    Consider what physical exams and diagnostic tests would be appropriate to gather more information about the patient’s condition. Reflect on how the results would be used to make a diagnosis.

    Identify three to five possible conditions to consider in a differential diagnosis for the patient.

    Consider the patient’s diagnosis. Think about clinical guidelines that might support this diagnosis.

    Develop a treatment plan for each patient that includes health promotion and patient education strategies for pre- and post-operative care patients.

    To complete:

    As you interact with this week’s i-Human patient, complete the assigned case study. As you interact with this week’s i-Human patients, complete the assigned case studies. For guidance on using i-Human, refer to the 
    i-Human Patients Case Player Student Manual
     in the Week 2 Learning Resources.

    By Day 7

    This Assignment is due.

    Grading Information

    Week 2 i-Human Rubric

    Week in Review

    This week
     you analyzed the unique set of limitations and challenges when providing safe and effective care in perioperative environments for pre-and-post operative patients. You also developed differential diagnoses and treatment plans for these patients. NURS 6560 – Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients Essay Assignment Papers.

    Next week
     you will explore the assessment and care of pre- and post-operative patients with conditions specifically related to the head, neck, esophagus, and diaphragm, and examine strategies for assessment, diagnosis, and treatment.

    NURS 6560 – Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients Essay Assignment Papers

    Discussion_Rubric

     

    Outstanding Performance

    Excellent Performance

    Competent Performance

    Proficient Performance

    Room for Improvement

    Main Posting:

    Response to the discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

    44 (44%) – 44 (44%)

    Thoroughly responds to the discussion question(s)

    is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

    supported by at least 3 current, credible sources

    40 (40%) – 43 (43%)

    Responds to the discussion question(s)

    is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

    75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth

    supported by at least 3 credible references

    35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

    Responds to most of the discussion question(s)

    is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

    50% of post has exceptional depth and breadth

    supported by at least 3 credible references

    31 (31%) – 34 (34%)

    Responds to some of the discussion question(s)

    one to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed

    is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis

    somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

    post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references

    0 (0%) – 30 (30%)

    Does not respond to the discussion question(s)

    lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria

    lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis

    does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

    contains only 1 or no credible references

    Main Posting:

    Writing

    6 (6%) – 6 (6%)

    Written clearly and concisely

    Contains no grammatical or spelling errors

    Fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style

    5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)

    Written clearly and concisely

    May contain one or no grammatical or spelling error

    Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style

    5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

    Written concisely

    May contain one to two grammatical or spelling error

    Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style

    4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)

    Written somewhat concisely

    May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors

    Contains some APA formatting errors

    0 (0%) – 4 (4%)

    Not written clearly or concisely

    Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors

    Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style

    Main Posting:

    Timely and full participation

    10 (10%) – 10 (10%)

    Meets requirements for timely and full participation

    posts main discussion by due date

    0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

    NA

    0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

    NA

    0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

    NA

    0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

    Does not meet requirement for full participation

    First Response:

    Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.

    9 (9%) – 9 (9%)

    Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings

    responds to questions posed by faculty

    the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives

    8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)

    Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. NURS 6560 – Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients Essay Assignment Papers

    7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)

    Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting

    6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)

    Response is on topic, may have some depth

    0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

    Response may not be on topic, lacks depth

    First Response: 

    Writing

    6 (6%) – 6 (6%)

    Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues

    Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed

    Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources

    Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

    5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)

    Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues

    Response to faculty questions are answered if posed

    Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources

    Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

    5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

    Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues

    Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed

    Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources

    Response is written in Standard Edited English

    4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)

    Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication

    Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed

    Few or no credible sources are cited

    0 (0%) – 4 (4%)

    Responses posted in the discussion lack effective

    Response to faculty questions are missing

    No credible sources are cited

    First Response:

    Timely and full participation

    5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

    Meets requirements for timely and full participation

    posts by due date

    0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

    NA

    0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

    NA

    0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

    NA

    0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

    Does not meet requirement for full participation

    Second Response:

    Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.

    9 (9%) – 9 (9%)

    Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings * responds to questions posed by faculty

    the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives

    8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)

    Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings

    7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)

    Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting

    6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)

    Response is on topic, may have some depth

    0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

    Response may not be on topic, lacks depth

    Second Response:

    Writing

    6 (6%) – 6 (6%)

    Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues

    Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed

    Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources

    Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

    5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)

    Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues

    Response to faculty questions are answered if posed

    Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources

    Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

    5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

    Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues

    Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed

    Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources

    Response is written in Standard Edited English

    4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)

    Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication

    Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed

    Few or no credible sources are cited

    0 (0%) – 4 (4%)

    Responses posted in the discussion lack effective

    Response to faculty questions are missing

    No credible sources are cited

    Second Response:

    Timely and full participation

    5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

    Meets requirements for timely and full participation

    Posts by due date

    0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

    NA

    0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

    NA

    0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

    NA

    0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

    Does not meet requirement for full participation

    Total Points: 100

    NURS 6560 – Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients Essay Assignment Papers

    Application_Rubric (iHuman)

     

    Novice

    Emerging

    Proficient

    HPI Statement

    0 (0%) – 5 (5%)

    Poorly written HPI statement. Incomplete ideas and sentences. Lacks basic history taking skills

    6 (6%) – 10 (10%)

    Well written HPI statement but may be missing 1-2 key components from the history

    11 (11%) – 15 (15%)

    Clearly written HPI statement with comprehensive information gathering from case questions.

    Objective testing and physical exam

    0 (0%) – 5 (5%)

    Poorly written physical examination. May be missing 3 or more key exam findings that are critical to patient’s diagnosis. Includes 3 or more inappropriate exams or tests.

    6 (6%) – 10 (10%)

    Well written physical examination but may be missing 1-2 key exam findings critical to patient’s diagnosis. May include 1-2 unnecessary exams or tests.

    11 (11%) – 15 (15%)

    Clearly written physical examination covering all critical components of a focus exam. Tests that are ordered are appropriate for patient and cost effective.

    Assessment

    0 (0%) – 10 (10%)

    Differential diagnosis list too brief and inconclusive. May be missing 3 or more critical components. Priority list may be out of order. Primary diagnosis may be wrong.

    11 (11%) – 19 (19%)

    Well written differential diagnoses. May be missing 1-2 critical components. Correct primary diagnosis identified.

    20 (20%) – 25 (25%)

    Clearly written differential diagnoses. Primary diagnosis identified.

    Plan for patient

    0 (0%) – 15 (15%)

    Poorly written plan. May be missing 3 or more key issues that are critical to patient’s diagnosis. NURS 6560 – Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients Essay Assignment Papers

    16 (16%) – 25 (25%)

    Well written plan but may be missing 1-2 key issues critical to patient’s diagnosis.

    26 (26%) – 30 (30%)

    Clearly written plan covering all critical components for patient’s final diagnosis.

    Clinical Questions

    0 (0%) – 10 (10%)

    Correctly answered 0-69% of the clinical question

    11 (11%) – 13 (13%)

    Correctly answered 70-89% of the clinical question

    14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

    Correctly answered 90-100% of the clinical questions

    Total Points: 100

    NURS 6560 – Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients Essay Assignment Papers

  • Assessment and Care of Patients With Conditions of the Head, Neck, Esophagus, and Diaphragm

    Assessment and Care of Patients With Conditions of the Head, Neck, Esophagus, and Diaphragm

    Health conditions involving the head, neck, esophagus, and diaphragm can disrupt patients’ daily lives, making surgical interventions necessary. Consider Janice Savage-Martin, who frequently experienced impaired breathing, congestion, and headaches. These symptoms and the pain associated with them put a strain on her normal routine and ability to work. After being diagnosed with turbinates and a deviated septum, providers recommended surgery to shrink the blood vessels in the turbinates. Like many surgical patients, however, Janice was concerned that her recovery would be painful and might lead to further health complications (Methodist Health System, 2015). As an advanced practice nurse who cares for surgical patients like Janice, you will play significant role in educating patients, easing concerns, and providing evidence-based care. Assessment and Care of Patients With Conditions of the Head, Neck, Esophagus, and Diaphragm

    ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW

    This week, as you explore the pre- and post-operative care of patients with conditions related to the head, neck, esophagus, and diaphragm, you examine strategies for assessment, diagnosis, and treatment.

    Learning Objectives

    By the end of this week, students will:

    Evaluate medical and surgical patients with conditions related to the head, neck, esophagus, and diaphragm

    Develop differential diagnoses for medical and surgical patients with conditions related to the head, neck, esophagus, and diaphragm

    Develop treatment plans for medical and surgical patients with conditions related to the head, neck, esophagus, and diaphragm

    Photo Credit: Mario Gh/EyeEm/EyeEm/Getty Images

    Learning Resources

    Required Readings

    Colyar, M. R. (2015).
    Advanced practice nursing procedures
    (1st ed.). Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis Company.

     

    Chapter 69, “Occipital Nerve Block”

    Chapter 72, “Corneal Abrasion and Foreign Body Removal—Eye”

    Chapter 73, “Eye Drop Insertion”

    Chapter 74, “Eye Irrigation”

    Chapter 75, “Eye Trauma Stabilization”

    Chapter 78, “Auricular Hematoma Evacuation”

    Chapter 81, “Epistaxis Control”

    Chapter 82, “Laryngoscopy”

    Chapter 83, “Nasal Lavage”

    Chapter 84, “Removal of Foreign Body—Ear and Nose”

    Chapter 85, “Frenotomy for Ankyloglossia”

    Chapter 86, “Lip Laceration Repair”

    Chapter 87, “Tongue Laceration Repair”

    Doherty, G. M. (2015).
    Current diagnosis and treatment: Surgery
    (14th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.

     

    Chapter 15, “Otolaryngology—Head & Neck Surgery”

    Chapter 16, “Thyroid and Parathyroid”

    Chapter 20, “Esophagus & Diaphragm”

    Chapter 37, “The Eye & Ocular Adenxa”

    Weber, E. C., Vilensky, J. A., & Fog, A. M. (2013).
    Practical radiology: A symptom-based approach.
    Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis Company.

     

    Chapter 5, “EENT Imaging”

    Javan, R., Machin, J. E., McGinnis, R. S., Moinuddin, M., & Sarti, M. (2013).
    Thyroid ultrasound top 10 pathology.
    Retrieved from http://www.med-ed.virginia.edu/courses/rad/Thyroid_Ultrasound/index.html, Assessment and Care of Patients With Conditions of the Head, Neck, Esophagus, and Diaphragm

    Wipperman, J. L., & Dorsch, J. N. (2013). Evaluation and management of corneal abrasions.
    American Family Physician, 87
    (2), 114–120. Retrieved from http://www.aafp.org/afp/2013/0115/p114.html

    Required Media

    i-Human Patient Cases. (2014). Retrieved from https://ih2.i-human.com/users/sign_in

    Seger, D. (2010).
    EGD (upper endoscopy)
    [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZvudWuvMjtA

    Assignment 1: Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients – Head, Neck, Esophagus, and Diaphragm

    There are many common health conditions associated with the head, neck, esophagus, and diaphragm. Although these conditions and their related symptoms usually are managed easily, a delay in treatment can result in sensory debility such as hearing loss or sight loss. For this Assignment, as you examine this week’s i-Human patient case study, consider how you might evaluate and treat pre- and post-operative patients who present with health conditions related to the head, neck, esophagus, and diaphragm.

    To prepare:

    Review this week’s Learning Resources. With the head, neck, esophagus, and diaphragm in mind, consider how to assess, diagnose, and treat patients in pre- and post-operative care.

    Review this week’s i-Human case study. Based on the patient information provided, think about the health history you would need to collect from the patient.

    Consider what physical exams and diagnostic tests would be appropriate to gather more information about the patient’s condition. Reflect on how the results would be used to make a diagnosis.

    Identify three to five possible conditions to consider in a differential diagnosis for the patient.

    Consider the patient’s diagnosis. Think about clinical guidelines that might support this diagnosis.

    Develop a treatment plan for the patient that includes health promotion and patient education strategies for medical and surgical patients with conditions related to the head, neck, esophagus, and diaphragm.

    To complete:

    As you interact with this week’s i-Human patient, complete the assigned case study. For guidance on using i-Human, refer to the 
    i-Human Patients Case Player Student Manual
     in the Week 2 Learning Resources.

    By Day 7

    This Assignment is due.

    Grading Information

    Week 3 i-Human Rubric

    Assignment 2: Fitzgerald Health Education Associates (FHEA) AGPCNP 150 University Exit Comprehensive Exam

    The Fitzgerald Health Education Associates (FHEA) AGACNP 150 University Exit Comprehensive Exam is a learning activity used to guide your preparation for your national certification exams. The results of the exam will help you understand how well prepared you are for your national certification exams and the areas in which you need to further prepare.

    In Weeks 1 or 2 of this course, you should have received an email from
     Fitzgerald Health Education Associates (FHEA) explaining how to access the Fitzgerald Health Education Associates (FHEA) AGACNP 150 University Exit Comprehensive Exam. Please follow the directions FHEA provided and complete the exam. Assessment and Care of Patients With Conditions of the Head, Neck, Esophagus, and Diaphragm

    This exam is graded on a S/U basis. You must complete the exam by Day 7 of Week 3 to receive the grade of ‘S’.

    By Day 7

    Complete
     the Fitzgerald Health Education Associates (FHEA) AGACNP 150 University Exit Comprehensive Exam.

    Week in Review

    This week
     you evaluated medical and surgical patients with head, neck, esophagus and diaphragm conditions/injuries with the realization that delays in treatment could result in hearing or sight loss, and developed differential diagnoses and treatment plans for these conditions.

    Next week
     you will study the pre- and post-operative care of patients with cardiovascular conditions and examine strategies for assessment, diagnosis, and treatment.

    Assessment and Care of Patients With Conditions of the Head, Neck, Esophagus, and Diaphragm

  • Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients – Head, Neck, Esophagus, and Diaphragm Essay Assignment Papers

    Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients – Head, Neck, Esophagus, and Diaphragm Essay Assignment Papers

    Week 3: Assessment and Care of Patients With Conditions of the Head, Neck, Esophagus, and Diaphragm

    Health conditions involving the head, neck, esophagus, and diaphragm can disrupt patients’ daily lives, making surgical interventions necessary. Consider Janice Savage-Martin, who frequently experienced impaired breathing, congestion, and headaches. These symptoms and the pain associated with them put a strain on her normal routine and ability to work. After being diagnosed with turbinates and a deviated septum, providers recommended surgery to shrink the blood vessels in the turbinates. Like many surgical patients, however, Janice was concerned that her recovery would be painful and might lead to further health complications (Methodist Health System, 2015). As an advanced practice nurse who cares for surgical patients like Janice, you will play significant role in educating patients, easing concerns, and providing evidence-based care.

    ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW

    This week, as you explore the pre- and post-operative care of patients with conditions related to the head, neck, esophagus, and diaphragm, you examine strategies for assessment, diagnosis, and treatment.

    Learning Objectives

    By the end of this week, students will:

    Evaluate medical and surgical patients with conditions related to the head, neck, esophagus, and diaphragm

    Develop differential diagnoses for medical and surgical patients with conditions related to the head, neck, esophagus, and diaphragm

    Develop treatment plans for medical and surgical patients with conditions related to the head, neck, esophagus, and diaphragm. Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients – Head, Neck, Esophagus, and Diaphragm Essay Assignment Papers

    Photo Credit: Mario Gh/EyeEm/EyeEm/Getty Images

    Learning Resources

    Required Readings

    Colyar, M. R. (2015).
    Advanced practice nursing procedures
    (1st ed.). Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis Company.

    Chapter 69, “Occipital Nerve Block”

    Chapter 72, “Corneal Abrasion and Foreign Body Removal—Eye”

    Chapter 73, “Eye Drop Insertion”

    Chapter 74, “Eye Irrigation”

    Chapter 75, “Eye Trauma Stabilization”

    Chapter 78, “Auricular Hematoma Evacuation”

    Chapter 81, “Epistaxis Control”

    Chapter 82, “Laryngoscopy”

    Chapter 83, “Nasal Lavage”

    Chapter 84, “Removal of Foreign Body—Ear and Nose”

    Chapter 85, “Frenotomy for Ankyloglossia”

    Chapter 86, “Lip Laceration Repair”

    Chapter 87, “Tongue Laceration Repair”

    Doherty, G. M. (2015).
    Current diagnosis and treatment: Surgery
    (14th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.

     

    Chapter 15, “Otolaryngology—Head & Neck Surgery”

    Chapter 16, “Thyroid and Parathyroid”

    Chapter 20, “Esophagus & Diaphragm”

    Chapter 37, “The Eye & Ocular Adenxa”

    Weber, E. C., Vilensky, J. A., & Fog, A. M. (2013).
    Practical radiology: A symptom-based approach.
    Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis Company. Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients – Head, Neck, Esophagus, and Diaphragm Essay Assignment Papers

    Chapter 5, “EENT Imaging”

    Javan, R., Machin, J. E., McGinnis, R. S., Moinuddin, M., & Sarti, M. (2013).
    Thyroid ultrasound top 10 pathology.
    Retrieved from http://www.med-ed.virginia.edu/courses/rad/Thyroid_Ultrasound/index.html

    Wipperman, J. L., & Dorsch, J. N. (2013). Evaluation and management of corneal abrasions.
    American Family Physician, 87
    (2), 114–120. Retrieved from http://www.aafp.org/afp/2013/0115/p114.html

     

    Required Media

    i-Human Patient Cases. (2014). Retrieved from https://ih2.i-human.com/users/sign_in

    Seger, D. (2010).
    EGD (upper endoscopy)
    [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZvudWuvMjtA

     

    Assignment 1: Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients – Head, Neck, Esophagus, and Diaphragm

    There are many common health conditions associated with the head, neck, esophagus, and diaphragm. Although these conditions and their related symptoms usually are managed easily, a delay in treatment can result in sensory debility such as hearing loss or sight loss. For this Assignment, as you examine this week’s i-Human patient case study, consider how you might evaluate and treat pre- and post-operative patients who present with health conditions related to the head, neck, esophagus, and diaphragm.

    To prepare:

    Review this week’s Learning Resources. With the head, neck, esophagus, and diaphragm in mind, consider how to assess, diagnose, and treat patients in pre- and post-operative care.

    Review this week’s i-Human case study. Based on the patient information provided, think about the health history you would need to collect from the patient.

    Consider what physical exams and diagnostic tests would be appropriate to gather more information about the patient’s condition. Reflect on how the results would be used to make a diagnosis.

    Identify three to five possible conditions to consider in a differential diagnosis for the patient.

    Consider the patient’s diagnosis. Think about clinical guidelines that might support this diagnosis.

    Develop a treatment plan for the patient that includes health promotion and patient education strategies for medical and surgical patients with conditions related to the head, neck, esophagus, and diaphragm.

    To complete:

    As you interact with this week’s i-Human patient, complete the assigned case study. For guidance on using i-Human, refer to the 
    i-Human Patients Case Player Student Manual
     in the Week 2 Learning Resources. Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients – Head, Neck, Esophagus, and Diaphragm Essay Assignment Papers

    By Day 7

    This Assignment is due.

    Grading Information

    Week 3 i-Human Rubric

    Assignment 2: Fitzgerald Health Education Associates (FHEA) AGPCNP 150 University Exit Comprehensive Exam

    The Fitzgerald Health Education Associates (FHEA) AGACNP 150 University Exit Comprehensive Exam is a learning activity used to guide your preparation for your national certification exams. The results of the exam will help you understand how well prepared you are for your national certification exams and the areas in which you need to further prepare.

    In Weeks 1 or 2 of this course, you should have received an email from
     Fitzgerald Health Education Associates (FHEA) explaining how to access the Fitzgerald Health Education Associates (FHEA) AGACNP 150 University Exit Comprehensive Exam. Please follow the directions FHEA provided and complete the exam.

    This exam is graded on a S/U basis. You must complete the exam by Day 7 of Week 3 to receive the grade of ‘S’. Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients – Head, Neck, Esophagus, and Diaphragm Essay Assignment Papers

    By Day 7

    Complete
     the Fitzgerald Health Education Associates (FHEA) AGACNP 150 University Exit Comprehensive Exam.

    Week in Review

    This week
     you evaluated medical and surgical patients with head, neck, esophagus and diaphragm conditions/injuries with the realization that delays in treatment could result in hearing or sight loss, and developed differential diagnoses and treatment plans for these conditions. Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients – Head, Neck, Esophagus, and Diaphragm Essay Assignment Papers

    Next week
     you will study the pre- and post-operative care of patients with cardiovascular conditions and examine strategies for assessment, diagnosis, and treatment.

    Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients – Head, Neck, Esophagus, and Diaphragm Essay Assignment Papers. Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients – Head, Neck, Esophagus, and Diaphragm Essay Assignment Papers

    iHuman (Application) Rubric

     

    Novice

    Emerging

    Proficient

    HPI Statement

    0 (0%) – 5 (5%)

    Poorly written HPI statement. Incomplete ideas and sentences. Lacks basic history taking skills

    6 (6%) – 10 (10%)

    Well written HPI statement but may be missing 1-2 key components from the history

    11 (11%) – 15 (15%)

    Clearly written HPI statement with comprehensive information gathering from case questions.

    Objective testing and physical exam

    0 (0%) – 5 (5%)

    Poorly written physical examination. May be missing 3 or more key exam findings that are critical to patient’s diagnosis. Includes 3 or more inappropriate exams or tests.

    6 (6%) – 10 (10%)

    Well written physical examination but may be missing 1-2 key exam findings critical to patient’s diagnosis. May include 1-2 unnecessary exams or tests.

    11 (11%) – 15 (15%)

    Clearly written physical examination covering all critical components of a focus exam. Tests that are ordered are appropriate for patient and cost effective.

    Assessment

    0 (0%) – 10 (10%)

    Differential diagnosis list too brief and inconclusive. May be missing 3 or more critical components. Priority list may be out of order. Primary diagnosis may be wrong.

    11 (11%) – 19 (19%)

    Well written differential diagnoses. May be missing 1-2 critical components. Correct primary diagnosis identified.

    20 (20%) – 25 (25%)

    Clearly written differential diagnoses. Primary diagnosis identified.

    Plan for patient. 
    Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients – Head, Neck, Esophagus, and Diaphragm Essay Assignment Papers

    0 (0%) – 15 (15%)

    Poorly written plan. May be missing 3 or more key issues that are critical to patient’s diagnosis.

    16 (16%) – 25 (25%)

    Well written plan but may be missing 1-2 key issues critical to patient’s diagnosis.

    26 (26%) – 30 (30%)

    Clearly written plan covering all critical components for patient’s final diagnosis.

    Clinical Questions

    0 (0%) – 10 (10%)

    Correctly answered 0-69% of the clinical question

    11 (11%) – 13 (13%)

    Correctly answered 70-89% of the clinical question

    14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

    Correctly answered 90-100% of the clinical questions

    Total Points: 100

     

    Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients – Head, Neck, Esophagus, and Diaphragm Essay Assignment Papers

  • NURS 6560 – Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients Essay Assignment Paper

    NURS 6560 – Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients Essay Assignment Paper

    Pre- and Post-Operative Care

    “A wide range of illnesses and injuries may require treatment that includes some type of surgical intervention. Surgery may be planned or unplanned, major or minor, invasive or noninvasive, and may involve any body part or system”

    —Pamela Lynn (2008).

    As this quotation suggests, advanced practice nurses must be able to provide pre- and post-operative care to patients with various illnesses and injuries. Consider a 17-year-old patient who is injured in a car accident. The patient has severe burns on her legs, and several toes on her right foot require amputation. Her injuries are affecting multiple body systems. As an advanced practice nurse, how might you stabilize and prepare this patient for surgery? What areas of care will be your focus as the patient recovers from surgery?

    This week, you examine and discuss limitations and challenges of clinical practice. Then, as you explore the role of the advanced practice nurse in perioperative settings, you examine strategies for assessing, diagnosing, and treating patients in pre- and post-operative care. NURS 6560 – Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients Essay Assignment Paper

    Learning Objectives

    ORDER A CUSTOM-WRITTEN PAPER NOW

    By the end of this week, students will:

    Analyze limitations and challenges of clinical practice

    Evaluate pre- and post-operative care patients

    Develop differential diagnoses for pre- and post-operative care patients

    Develop treatment plans for pre- and post-operative care patients

    Photo Credit: PhotoAlto/Odilon Dimier/PhotoAlto Agency RF Collections/Getty Images

    Learning Resources

    Required Readings

    Colyar, M. R. (2015).
    Advanced practice nursing procedures
    (1st ed.). Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis Company.

    Chapter 1, “Punch Biopsy”

    Chapter 2, “Skin Biopsy”

    Chapter 4, “Abscesses—Incision and Drainage Drainage (Furuncle, Felon, Paronychia, Pilonidal Cyst, Perianal Cyst)”

    Chapter 7, “Burns—Debridement”

    Chapter 8, “Digital Nerve Block”

    Chapter 12, “Sebaceous Cyst Removal”

    Chapter 17, “Soft Tissue Aspiration”

    Chapter 21, “Subungual Hematoma Excision”

    Chapter 22, “Suture Insertion”

    Chapter 23, “Suture Selection”

    Chapter 24, “Suture Removal”

    Chapter 26, “Topical Hemostatic Agent Application”

    Chapter 27, “Ulcer Debridement”

    Doherty, G. M. (2015).
    Current diagnosis and treatment: Surgery
    (14th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill. NURS 6560 – Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients Essay Assignment Paper

    Chapter 6, “Wound Healing”

    Chapter 8, “Inflammation, Infection, & Antimicrobial Therapy in Surgery”

    Chapter 9, “Fluid & Electrolyte Management & Acid-Base Disorders”

    Chapter 10, “Surgical Metabolism & Nutrition”

    Chapter 13, “Management of the Injured Patient”

    Chapter 14, “Burns & Other Thermal Injuries”

    Document:
    i-Human Patients, Inc. (2014).
    i-Human patients case player student manual.

    Throughout this course, you will be required to complete case study assignments within i-Human Patients. This manual provides guidance on accessing and using these simulation. It is highly recommended that you explore the various training resources offered in this manual in preparation for the upcoming Assignments.Throughout this course, you will be required to complete case study assignments within i-Human Patients. This manual provides guidance on accessing and using these simulation. It is highly recommended that you explore the various training resources offered in this manual in preparation for the upcoming Assignments. NURS 6560 – Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients Essay Assignment Paper

    Required Media

    Note:
     You should have received an e-mail with your i-Human Patients login and password information. If you have not received this information, please contact your Instructor.

    i-Human Patient Cases. (2014). Retrieved from https://ih2.i-human.com/users/sign_in

    Vo, H. (2012).
    Placement of central venous catheter—NEJM
    [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HE5QhsPRaPU

    Optional Resources

    University of Michigan Trauma Burn Center. (2015).
    Fluid resuscitation.
    Retrieved from http://www.traumaburn.org/referring/fluid.shtml

    U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. (2014).
    Burn triage and treatment: Thermal injuries.
    Retrieved from http://www.remm.nlm.gov/burns.htm

    Discussion Part I: Limitations and Challenges

    From providing ongoing assessments to monitoring for complications and facilitating recovery, advanced practice nurses who care for patients in perioperative environments experience a unique set of limitations and challenges. Reflecting on your experiences in this complex and critical environment will help you develop your professional competency and prepare you for your future role as an advanced practice nurse. In this week’s Discussion, you consider limitations and challenges of clinical practice in perioperative care settings. NURS 6560 – Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients Essay Assignment Paper

    To prepare:

    Reflect on this week’s clinical experiences.

    Consider one limitation or challenge you encountered.

    Think about how you overcame this limitation or challenge and how this might affect your future practice in pre- and post-operative care settings.

    By Day 3

    Post
     a description of at least one limitation or challenge you encountered during your clinical experience this week. Explain how you overcame this limitation or challenge and how this might affect your future practice.

    Note:
     If you refer to a patient in your Discussions or Assignments, be sure to use a pseudonym or other false form of identification. This is to ensure the privacy and protection of the patient.

    Read
     a selection of your colleagues’ responses.

    By Day 6

    Respond
     to 
    two colleagues
     by sharing additional insights or alternative perspectives.

    Discussion Part II: Pharmacology

    Note:
     To access this week’s required library resources, please click on the link to the Course Readings List, found in the Course Materials section of your Syllabus.

    To prepare:

    Read the following articles to enhance your knowledge of commonly prescribed medications:

    Ando, S., Yasugi, D., Matsumoto, T., Kanata, S., & Kasai, K. (2014). Serious outcomes associated with overdose of medicines containing barbiturates for treatment of insomnia.
    Psychiatry Clinical Neuroscience, 68
    (9), 721.

    Serious outcomes associated with overdose of medicines containing barbiturates for treatment of insomnia by Ando, S., et al in Psychiatry Clinical Neuroscience, 68(9). Copyright 2014 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Reprinted by permission of John Wiley & Sons, Inc., via the Copyright Clearance Center.

    Dassanayake, T. L., Jones, A. L., Michie, P. T., Carter, G. L., McElduff, P., Stokes, B. J., & Whyte, I. M. (2012). Risk of road traffic accidents in patients discharged following treatment for psychotropic drug overdose: A self-controlled case series study in Australia.
    CNS Drugs 26
    (3), 269–276. NURS 6560 – Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients Essay Assignment Paper

    Note:
    Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.

    Kulick, D., & Deen, D. (2011). Specialized nutrition support.
    American Family Physician, 83
    (2), 173–183. Retrieved from http://www.aafp.org/afp/2011/0115/p173.html

    Martini, D. I., Nacca, N., Haswell, D., Cobb, T., & Hodgman, M. (2015). Serotonin syndrome following metaxalone overdose and therapeutic use of a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor.
    Clinical Toxicology 53
    (3), 185–187.

    Serotonin syndrome following metaxalone overdose and therapeutic use of a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor by Martini, D., in Clinical Toxicology, 53(3). Copyright 2015 by Informa Healthcare. Reprinted by permission of Informa Healthcare via the Copyright Clearance Center.

    Robinson, A., & Wermeling, D. P. (2014). Intranasal naloxone administration for treatment of opioid overdose.
    American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 71
    (24), 2129–2135.

    Note:
    Retrieved from the Walden Library databases. NURS 6560 – Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients Essay Assignment Paper

    Thomas, D. R. (2013). Total parenteral nutrition (TPN). In
    The Merck Manual Professional Edition.
    Retrieved from http://www.merckmanuals.com/professional/nutritional_disorders/nutritional_support/total_parenteral_

    All of the following groups of medications are commonly prescribed in the acute care setting. Choose one of the topics below to discuss. If it is a medication group, select a specific drug within that group. (This is a good way for you to prepare for clinical practice, because you will get to know the drugs you will prescribe for patients.). Focus your discussion on the hospital or ICU setting and IV usage.

    KPhos, bicarb, calcium, magnesium

    Iron, folic acid, B12

    Diamox

    Macrolides

    Muinolones/mluoroquinolone

    Cephalosporins, 4th and 5th generation

    Aminoglycosides

    Carbapenems

    Lipopeptide

    Tigecycline

    Note:
     When sharing your initial post, select a topic that has not yet been discussed. If all topics have been discussed, then you may select that topic again, but select a different drug within the medication group. NURS 6560 – Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients Essay Assignment Paper

    By Day 3

    For this Discussion, address 1 of the following options:

    Option 1

    Post
     a description of a patient you have taken care of (inpatient as an RN, or as an NP student) who has been prescribed the medication you selected. Include the scenario, indication, dosing, complications, and outcome. Then explain whether or not you would have ordered the same drug and same dose.

    Option 2

    Conduct an evidence-based drug search on the drug you selected and 
    post
     an explanation of any possible issues. Are there any drug interactions? Any black box warnings? To what type of patient would you prescribe this medication?

    Option 3

    Post
     an explanation of the properties of the drug you selected, including usages and dosing in the hospital or ICU. Discuss a patient to whom you would prescribe this medication.

    Note:
     To be considered as one of your required responses, your pharmacology rationale must include a supporting reference.

    Note:
     For this Discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the “Post to Discussion Question” link and then select “Create Thread” to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click on Submit, you cannot delete or edit your own posts, and you cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking on Submit! NURS 6560 – Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients Essay Assignment Paper

    Submission and Grading Information

    Grading Criteria

    Week 2 Discussion Rubric

    Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6

    To participate in this Discussion:

    Week 2 Discussion

    Assignment: Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients

    The perioperative period is critical for surgical patients. Whether patients require fluid and electrolyte management, pain management, or treatment for infections or surgical complications, advanced practice nurses must be able to provide safe and effective care. For this Assignment, as you examine this week’s i-Human patient case study, consider how you might evaluate and treat patients who require pre- and post-operative care. NURS 6560 – Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients Essay Assignment Paper

    To prepare:

    Review this week’s Learning Resources. Consider how to assess, diagnose, and treat patients in pre- and post-operative care.

    Review this week’s i-Human case study. Based on the patient information provided, think about the health history you would need to collect from the patient.

    Consider what physical exams and diagnostic tests would be appropriate to gather more information about the patient’s condition. Reflect on how the results would be used to make a diagnosis. NURS 6560 – Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients Essay Assignment Paper

    Identify three to five possible conditions to consider in a differential diagnosis for the patient.

    Consider the patient’s diagnosis. Think about clinical guidelines that might support this diagnosis.

    Develop a treatment plan for each patient that includes health promotion and patient education strategies for pre- and post-operative care patients.

    To complete:

    As you interact with this week’s i-Human patient, complete the assigned case study. As you interact with this week’s i-Human patients, complete the assigned case studies. For guidance on using i-Human, refer to the 
    i-Human Patients Case Player Student Manual
     in the Week 2 Learning Resources.

    By Day 7

    This Assignment is due.

    Grading Information

    Week 2 i-Human Rubric

    Week in Review

    This week
     you analyzed the unique set of limitations and challenges when providing safe and effective care in perioperative environments for pre-and-post operative patients. You also developed differential diagnoses and treatment plans for these patients. NURS 6560 – Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients Essay Assignment Paper

    Next week
     you will explore the assessment and care of pre- and post-operative patients with conditions specifically related to the head, neck, esophagus, and diaphragm, and examine strategies for assessment, diagnosis, and treatment.

    NURS 6560 – Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients Essay Assignment Paper

    Application_Rubric

     

    Novice

    Emerging

    Proficient

    HPI Statement

    0 
    (0%)
     – 5 
    (5%)

    Poorly written HPI statement. Incomplete ideas and sentences. Lacks basic history taking skills

    6 
    (6%)
     – 10 
    (10%)

    Well written HPI statement but may be missing 1-2 key components from the history

    11 
    (11%)
     – 15 
    (15%)

    Clearly written HPI statement with comprehensive information gathering from case questions.

    Objective testing and physical exam

    0 
    (0%)
     – 5 
    (5%)

    Poorly written physical examination. May be missing 3 or more key exam findings that are critical to patient’s diagnosis. Includes 3 or more inappropriate exams or tests.

    6 
    (6%)
     – 10 
    (10%)

    Well written physical examination but may be missing 1-2 key exam findings critical to patient’s diagnosis. May include 1-2 unnecessary exams or tests.

    11 
    (11%)
     – 15 
    (15%)

    Clearly written physical examination covering all critical components of a focus exam. Tests that are ordered are appropriate for patient and cost effective.

    Assessment

    0 
    (0%)
     – 10 
    (10%)

    Differential diagnosis list too brief and inconclusive. May be missing 3 or more critical components. Priority list may be out of order. Primary diagnosis may be wrong.

    11 
    (11%)
     – 19 
    (19%)

    Well written differential diagnoses. May be missing 1-2 critical components. Correct primary diagnosis identified.

    20 
    (20%)
     – 25 
    (25%)

    Clearly written differential diagnoses. Primary diagnosis identified.

    Plan for patient

    0 
    (0%)
     – 15 
    (15%)

    Poorly written plan. May be missing 3 or more key issues that are critical to patient’s diagnosis.

    16 
    (16%)
     – 25 
    (25%)

    Well written plan but may be missing 1-2 key issues critical to patient’s diagnosis.

    26 
    (26%)
     – 30 
    (30%)

    Clearly written plan covering all critical components for patient’s final diagnosis.

    Clinical Questions

    0 
    (0%)
     – 10 
    (10%)

    Correctly answered 0-69% of the clinical question

    11 
    (11%)
     – 13 
    (13%)

    Correctly answered 70-89% of the clinical question

    14 
    (14%)
     – 15 
    (15%)

    Correctly answered 90-100% of the clinical questions

    NURS 6560 – Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients Essay Assignment Paper

    Discussion_Rubric

     

    Outstanding Performance

    Excellent Performance

    Competent Performance

    Proficient Performance

    Room for Improvement

    Main Posting:

    Response to the discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

    44 
    (44%)
     – 44 
    (44%)

    Thoroughly responds to the discussion question(s)

    is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

    supported by at least 3 current, credible sources

    40 
    (40%)
     – 43 
    (43%)

    Responds to the discussion question(s)

    is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

    75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth

    supported by at least 3 credible references.NURS 6560 – Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients Essay Assignment Paper

    35 
    (35%)
     – 39 
    (39%)

    Responds to most of the discussion question(s)

    is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

    50% of post has exceptional depth and breadth

    supported by at least 3 credible references

    31 
    (31%)
     – 34 
    (34%)

    Responds to some of the discussion question(s)

    one to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed

    is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis

    somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

    post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references

    0 
    (0%)
     – 30 
    (30%)

    Does not respond to the discussion question(s)

    lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria

    lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis

    does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

    contains only 1 or no credible references

    Main Posting:

    Writing

    NURS 6560 – Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients Essay Assignment Paper

    6 
    (6%)
     – 6 
    (6%)

    Written clearly and concisely

    Contains no grammatical or spelling errors

    Fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style

    5.5 
    (5.5%)
     – 5.5 
    (5.5%)

    Written clearly and concisely

    May contain one or no grammatical or spelling error

    Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style

    5 
    (5%)
     – 5 
    (5%)

    Written concisely

    May contain one to two grammatical or spelling error

    Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style

    4.5 
    (4.5%)
     – 4.5 
    (4.5%)

    Written somewhat concisely

    May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors

    Contains some APA formatting errors

    0 
    (0%)
     – 4 
    (4%)

    Not written clearly or concisely

    Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors

    Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style

    Main Posting:

    Timely and full participation

    10 
    (10%)
     – 10 
    (10%)

    Meets requirements for timely and full participation

    posts main discussion by due date

    0 
    (0%)
     – 0 
    (0%)

    NA

    0 
    (0%)
     – 0 
    (0%)

    NA

    0 
    (0%)
     – 0 
    (0%)

    NA

    0 
    (0%)
     – 0 
    (0%)

    Does not meet requirement for full participation

    First Response:

    Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.

    9 
    (9%)
     – 9 
    (9%)

    Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings

    responds to questions posed by faculty

    the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives

    8.5 
    (8.5%)
     – 8.5 
    (8.5%)

    Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings

    7.5 
    (7.5%)
     – 8 
    (8%)

    Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting

    6.5 
    (6.5%)
     – 7 
    (7%)

    Response is on topic, may have some depth

    0 
    (0%)
     – 6 
    (6%)

    Response may not be on topic, lacks depth

    First Response:

    Writing

    6 
    (6%)
     – 6 
    (6%)

    Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues

    Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed

    Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources

    Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

    5.5 
    (5.5%)
     – 5.5 
    (5.5%)

    Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues

    Response to faculty questions are answered if posed

    Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources

    Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

    5 
    (5%)
     – 5 
    (5%)

    Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues

    Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed

    Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources

    Response is written in Standard Edited English

    4.5 
    (4.5%)
     – 4.5 
    (4.5%)

    Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication

    Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed

    Few or no credible sources are cited

    0 
    (0%)
     – 4 
    (4%)

    Responses posted in the discussion lack effective

    Response to faculty questions are missing

    No credible sources are cited

    First Response:

    Timely and full participation

    5 
    (5%)
     – 5 
    (5%)

    Meets requirements for timely and full participation

    posts by due date

    0 
    (0%)
     – 0 
    (0%)

    NA

    0 
    (0%)
     – 0 
    (0%)

    NA

    0 
    (0%)
     – 0 
    (0%)

    NA

    0 
    (0%)
     – 0 
    (0%)

    Does not meet requirement for full participation

    Second Response:

    Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.

    9 
    (9%)
     – 9 
    (9%)

    Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings * responds to questions posed by faculty

    the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives

    NURS 6560 – Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients Essay Assignment Paper

    8.5 
    (8.5%)
     – 8.5 
    (8.5%)

    Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings

    7.5 
    (7.5%)
     – 8 
    (8%)

    Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting

    6.5 
    (6.5%)
     – 7 
    (7%)

    Response is on topic, may have some depth

    0 
    (0%)
     – 6 
    (6%)

    Response may not be on topic, lacks depth

    Second Response:

    Writing

    6 
    (6%)
     – 6 
    (6%)

    Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues

    Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed

    Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources

    Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

    5.5 
    (5.5%)
     – 5.5 
    (5.5%)

    Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues

    Response to faculty questions are answered if posed

    Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources

    Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

    5 
    (5%)
     – 5 
    (5%)

    Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues

    Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed

    Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources

    Response is written in Standard Edited English

    4.5 
    (4.5%)
     – 4.5 
    (4.5%)

    Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication

    Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed

    Few or no credible sources are cited

    0 
    (0%)
     – 4 
    (4%)

    Responses posted in the discussion lack effective

    Response to faculty questions are missing

    No credible sources are cited.NURS 6560 – Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients Essay Assignment Paper

    Second Response:

    Timely and full participation

    5 
    (5%)
     – 5 
    (5%)

    Meets requirements for timely and full participation

    Posts by due date

    0 
    (0%)
     – 0 
    (0%)

    NA

    0 
    (0%)
     – 0 
    (0%)

    NA

    0 
    (0%)
     – 0 
    (0%)

    NA

    0 
    (0%)
     – 0 
    (0%)

    Does not meet requirement for full participation

    NURS 6560 – Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients Essay Assignment Paper

  • Case Study on Death and Dying

    Case Study on Death and Dying

    The practice of health care providers at all levels brings you into contact with people from a variety of faiths. This calls for knowledge and acceptance of a diversity of faith expressions.

    The purpose of this paper is to complete a comparative ethical analysis of George’s situation and decision from the perspective of two worldviews or religions: Christianity and a second religion of your choosing. For the second faith, choose a faith that is unfamiliar to you. Examples of faiths to choose from include Sikh, Baha’i, Buddhism, Shintoism, etc.

    In your comparative analysis, address all of the worldview questions in detail for Christianity and your selected faith. Refer to Chapter 2 of 
    Called to Care
     for the list of questions. Once you have outlined the worldview of each religion, begin your ethical analysis from each perspective. Case Study on Death and Dying.

    ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW

    In a minimum of 1,500-2,000 words, provide an ethical analysis based upon the different belief systems, reinforcing major themes with insights gained from your research, and answering the following questions based on the research:

    How would each religion interpret the nature of George’s malady and suffering? Is there a “why” to his disease and suffering? (i.e., is there a reason for why George is ill, beyond the reality of physical malady?)

    In George’s analysis of his own life, how would each religion think about the value of his life as a person, and value of his life with ALS?

    What sorts of values and considerations would each religion focus on in deliberating about whether or not George should opt for euthanasia?

    Given the above, what options would be morally justified under each religion for George and why?

    Finally, present and defend your own view. Case Study on Death and Dying.

    Support your position by referencing at least three academic resources (preferably from the GCU Library) in addition to the course readings, lectures, the Bible, and the textbooks for each religion. Each religion must have a primary source included. A total of six references are required according to the specifications listed above. Incorporate the research into your writing in an appropriate, scholarly manner.

    Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is required.

    This Case Study on Death and Dying assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

    You are required to submit this Case Study on Death and Dying assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

    Case Study on Death and Dying

    Top of Form

    Case Study on Death and Dying 

     

    1

    Unsatisfactory

    0.00%

    2

    Less Than Satisfactory

    65.00%

    3

    Satisfactory

    75.00%

    4

    Good

    85.00%

    5

    Excellent

    100.00%

    70.0 %Content

     

    20.0 %Identification of Ethical Issues as They Relate to the Four Principles of Principlism

    The ethical issues are incorrectly organized. Case Study on Death and Dying

    Ethical issues are adequately organized according to the four principles of principlism. Some of the categorization is suspect.

    Ethical issues are organized according to the four principles of principlism.

    Ethical issues are organized according to the four principles of principlism. A distinction between the four principles is clearly stated, but the reasoning of the categorization is merely adequate.

    Ethical issues are organized according to the four principles of principlism. A distinction between the four principles and the reasoning of the categorization is clearly stated.

    20.0 %Description of the Christian Worldview and the Other Worldview

    The description of the Christian worldview and the selected worldview address little to none of the seven worldview questions and the description is mostly incorrect or irrelevant.

    The description of the Christian worldview and the selected worldview address most of the seven worldview questions with little evidence of a surface-level understanding.

    The description of the Christian worldview and the selected worldview adequately address all seven worldview questions, but the description has a surface-level understanding.

    The description of the Christian worldview and the selected worldview address all seven worldview questions with evidence of basic understanding utilizing a detailed description.

    The description of the Christian worldview and the selected worldview address all seven worldview questions with evidence of a deep understanding utilizing a detailed description.

    20.0 %Analysis of Ethical Issues through Christian Worldview and the Other Worldview

    The primary principles and values in the decision making process of each worldview have little to no relevance. Ethical reasoning seems to have no connection from the worldview considerations.

    The primary principles and values are acknowledged in the decision making process of each worldview. Ethical reasoning is loosely based from the worldview considerations.

    The primary principles and values surface in the decision making process of each worldview. Ethical reasoning is implied from the worldview considerations.

    The primary principles and values are recognized in the decision making process of each worldview. Ethical reasoning is explained from the worldview considerations. Most implications of the principles and values are given consideration.

    The primary principles and values are clearly distinguished in the decision making process of each worldview. Ethical reasoning is clearly delineated from the worldview considerations. The implications of the principles and values are given complete consideration.

    10.0 %Personal Recommendation

    The personal recommendation from the student’s worldview is stated, but the justification has little to no relevance.

    The personal recommendation from the student’s worldview is stated with proper justification. Case Study on Death and Dying

    The personal recommendation from the student’s worldview is stated with proper justification with some implications explained.

    The personal recommendation from the student’s worldview is stated with proper justification. The primary principles of the student’s worldview are clearly described with most implications explained.

    The personal recommendation from the student’s worldview is stated with proper justification. The primary principles of the student’s worldview are clearly described with all implications explained.

    20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

     

    7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose

    Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

    Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.

    Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.

    Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. They are descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

    Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

    8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction

    Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

    Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

    Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

    Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

    Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

    5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

    Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.

    Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

    Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

    Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

    Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. Case Study on Death and Dying

    10.0 %Format

     

    5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

    Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

    Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.

    Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

    Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

    All format elements are correct.

    5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

    Sources are not documented.

    Documentation of sources is inconsistent and/or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

    Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

    Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

    Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

    100 %Total Weightage

     

    Case Study on Death and Dying

     

    Case Study on Death and Dying

  • ASD(Atrial septal defects) and VSD (Ventricular septal defects)

    ASD(Atrial septal defects) and VSD (Ventricular septal defects)

    1)  You will be providing care for patients of different cultures. Choose a diet that would be cultural specific for a patient with new onset of hypertension. Identify the culture of the patient and discuss how you would explain this diet to your patient. For example, how would you adapt the D-A-S-H (dietary approaches to stop hypertension) diet for a Hispanic patient?

    2)   Briefly discuss the symptoms of right- and left-sided HF. What common primary care diagnoses result in the development of HF symptoms? Discuss the treatment of one of these common causes. What are some serious signs and symptoms of acute HF and the findings you may encounter during auscultation? When would you refer to cardiology for evaluation and treatment? Also discuss the criteria used to make a diagnosis of HF and interpretation of any diagnostic results that would be obtained. Consider your practicum experiences and discuss them as they relate to the topic.

    3) Discuss the definitions of ASD(Atrial septal defects) and VSD (Ventricular septal defects). What are the symptoms and the assessment findings you may encounter among children? What are the symptoms and physical examing findings from ascultation for each in adults? Briefly discuss treatment options for children and adults with ASD and VSD. ASD(Atrial septal defects) and VSD (Ventricular septal defects)

  • evidence-based intervention project

    Evidence-Based Practice – Using supporting documentation from at least one (1) nursing publication, describe how evidence-based practice is different from research. How would you identify a research project as being an evidence-based intervention project versus the creation of knowledge in a nursing research project?

  • Finance And The Health Care Manager Discussion

    Finance And The Health Care Manager Discussion

    With the amazing advances in health care in recent decades, one question that continues to stir debate within the political arena and from a personal perspective is: “How to pay for health care” Health care managers must be good stewards of their resources to allow the funds available to do the greatest good for the largest number of people. Health care finance information is critical to assessing the financial condition of an organization, as well as accessing whether the resources being spent are achieving the goals of the organization.

    To prepare
     for this Discussion, select a recent (within 5 years) relevant article from the Walden University library and current information from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and the Healthcare Financial Management Association, Knowledge Center, that addresses the importance of health care finance information in decision making within the health care setting.

    ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW

    Post
     a comprehensive response(250-350 words) to the following:

    How do health care managers depicted in the article and website information you selected apply the principles of financial management to decisions, to the assessment of the financial condition of an entity or stewardship, or to the assessment of the efficiency, effectiveness, and compliance with organization directives?

    Reference to files below:

    Cleverley, W., Song, P., & Cleverley, J. (2011). Essentials of health care finance (7th ed.). Sudbury, MA. Jones & Bartlett.

    Chapter 1, “Financial Information and the Decision Making Process”

    Cleverley, W., Song, P., & Cleverley, J. (2011). Essentials of health care finance (7th ed.). Sudbury, MA. Jones & Bartlett.

    Chapter 3, “Financial Environment of Healthcare Organizations”

    https://www.cms.gov/

    As early as 400 BC, the Hippocratic Oath admonished physicians to keep patients from harm or injustice. Current codes of ethics remind health care practitioners that safety and quality are imperative in health care. Yet quality and safety remain a critical issue for health care managers and patients today.

    To prepare for this Discussion, carefully review your Learning Resources. Seek additional resources to support your Discussion from one of the known web resources of health care quality: Finance And The Health Care Manager Discussion.

    Websites:

    The Joint Commission 
    http://www.jointcommission.org/

    Institute for Healthcare Improvement 
    http://www.ihi.org/ihi

    Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality 
    http://www.ahrq.gov/qual/

    Post
     a comprehensive response(250-350 words) to the following:

    How is quality of care viewed from the perspective of each of the followiing:

    A patient

    A health care provider

    A purchaser

    What role can the health care manager play in ensuring quality and safety in a health care setting? Select one of the different methods for improving the delivery of care described in your Learning Resources (this can include the websites identified). Provide a specific example of how that method can help protect a patient from errors of underuse, overuse, or misuse of care. Finance And The Health Care Manager Discussion

  • Musical Time Period Paper

    Musical Time Period Paper

    Article Review Information Students will complete a 3-5 page paper on a Musical Time Period (i.e. Classical Period, Romantic Period, etc), Musical Group, Style of Music (i.e. Glam Rock) as found in the course text due by (see schedule). You must state examples of musicians and style of music in your review. Musical influences should also be included (ex:Rock and Roll was influence by the music of Africa). The review will be in MLA format as per MiddleGeorgia Technical College English standards. You must site your resources. Article Review outline for student reference: Title page with yourname, class, student ID, and research paper name. Introduction: 3-5 sentences telling what the paper is about. Main Body: several paragraphs about the topic Closing statement: paragraph that ties the entire paper together in a final thought, usually 3-5 sentences. Bibliographythat states your sources on a separate page. Musical Time Period Paper