Category: Writing

The assessment A related A a real workplace case study, available A the prescribed text book. The use of a real workplace
case study A
Carlsberg Group will enable you A learn about workplace practices and HR trends A global companies. The case study specifically focuses on the challenges faced by Carlsberg during the development of HR strategies that are effective in a global context. While there are discussion questions shown at the end of the case study A the text book, these are for your own learning only. You should prepare a 2000 word case study report that addresses the following points:
1.1n your own words, outline the strategic HR priorities pursued by Carlsberg. 2. Discuss the rationale of implementing the ‘Winning Behaviours’ strategy 3. How does Carlsberg’s ‘Winning Behaviours’ strategy align with other HR practices such as: equity and diversity; workforce planning and development; social responsibility; and work-life balance. 4. Analyse the difficulties the company faced when implementing this strategy in Malaysia. 5. Provide an analysis of how well the ‘Winning Behaviours’ strategy would work in an Australian context, along with recommendations for how such an implementation could be successfully managed.
A minimum of 15 academic papers should A part of your literature review. Reference A any corporate information /including websites) will not A included as part of the required 15 academic papers.
Attachments:
3093652_1_WhatsApp-Image-2019-05-22-at-10.23.33-AM.jpeg

Assessment Feedback:
Please refer to the Assessment 3 rubrics at the end of this document and/or on CloudDeakin for the
assessment criteria and required performance levels.
Marks and feedback for Assessment 3 will be available to students on CloudDeakin following the
University’s release of final grades for Trimester 1.
Assessment Description
Page 2 of 9
The purpose of this assessment task is to provide you the opportunity to apply theoretical concepts
covered throughout on topics from Parts 2, 3 and 4 of Dwyer (2016) such as public relations,
communicating through visuals, oral presentation and writing for the professions.
Why is written communication important in public relations? Communication plays a vital role in
effective public relations. It’s very important that an organisation can communicate their message
well so that all parties are on the same page. The organisation that is doing the public relations
must understand exactly what it is their other party wants for exposure. For example, a speech that
the Vice Chancellor delivers could be public writing. An advertisement for Telstra could also be
public writing. Public writing is a message that someone expresses through writing, and is revealed
publicly. The main purpose is to gain exposure, or to get a message across to the public.
In this assessment task, you are to provide a written communication of 1500 words;
video/podcast/audio of five (5) minutes maximum; and a blog/topic commentaries of 1000 words.
Assessment Requirements
You are to provide:
1. Written communication of ONE (1) message to TWO (2) different audiences ie. one external
stakeholder and the other internal stakeholder.
You are required to provide:
a) A brief INTRODUCTION that provides context for the situation and an explanation for
your choice of stakeholder groups. (200 words)
In your Introduction, you are to outline the ‘situation’ and context of the stakeholder groups.
The situation should be actual as hopefully you will have some knowledge and familiarity.
It is also acceptable to select a situation that would be likely to occur in the future, but be
sure to apply it to the present timeframe.
You also need to identify the stakeholders you are addressing in your strategy and explain
why you chose them.
You should also explain the choice of selected media (i.e. Press Release and PowerPoint
presentation) for each stakeholder. For example, you prepare a Press Release for your
external stakeholders; and a multimedia PowerPoint presentation for your internal
stakeholders.
b) A written Press Release. (500 words)
c) A PowerPoint Presentation for your 5-minute audio recording. (500 word includes
speech transcript for the 5-minute audio)
d) A reflection on the key elements you have learnt, seen or experienced when you
developed a message for the written Press Release and PowerPoint presentation for
your two different stakeholders. (300 words)
2. A 5-minute audio (such as YouTube video, or audio embedded in the PowerPoint
presentation (Note: Please embed the audio on the final slide of your presentation), to get
your message across to your selected stakeholder groups (which can be either employees or
the general public or both).
Attachments:
3092586_1_T1-2019MPM-731-A3-FINAL.pdf

Paper:
WORST COWORKER PAPER
Your paper can focus on either a current coworker or a past coworker. The coworker
should be a real person, as opposed to an amalgam of multiple individuals. Moreover,
some portions of the paper work better if the coworker is of a similar hierarchical level to
you–as opposed to a boss or a supervisor. The paper should include the following three
sections:
1. Background
– Describe the coworker. Give enough detail that it’s clear why you feel
the way you do about this person, with enough richness that the section “brings the
person to life” for the reader. Feel free to omit or disguise any details that might be
sensitive in nature.
2. Explanations
– Drawing on key terms from Chapters 4-7 and 9, provide an
explanation of why, in your estimation, this employee has low levels of job
performance and/or organizational commitment. When I say “key terms”, I’m
referring to the words that are bolded in the chapters and that appear in the Key
Terms section at the end of each chapter. Given the strict word count, you’ll need to
strike a balance between breadth of coverage (i.e., the number of key terms
mentioned) and depth of coverage (i.e., how detailed your use of a given key term is
in explaining the employee’s attitudes and behaviors)
3. Recommendations
– Flowing out of the key terms discussed in the previous section,
describe what the top managers or leaders in the company could do, very
specifically, to improve the performance and/or commitment of your coworker. Then
describe what you, personally, could do to make this coworker more effective.
Finally, answer the following questions: Is this employee a “problem that cannot be
fixed” to some extent? If so, describe what the top managers or leaders in the
company could do to avoid similar problems in the future.
Beyond the parameters above, please bring your own self-expression, initiative, and
creativity to the content and style of the paper.
Attachments:
3091783_1_worest-coworker.docx

Objectives
Please refer to the Unit Profile to see how this assessment item relates to the Unit Learning Outcomes.
This assignment is designed to stimulate critical thinking outside of the classroom by requiring students
to write a formal academic report. You will need to follow the ARE process described in chapters 2 and
3 of Your Business Degree 2 (prescribed textbook for COIT20249) to analyse the assessment task,
research relevant information and evaluate the information you find. This information should be used to
write an academic report in which you present your findings or outcomes and make recommendations
for future practice. Professional writing and writing reports are described in chapters 4 and 5 of Your
Business Degree 2. This assessment task will assess your skills in critical thinking, researching
information, forming an opinion, academic writing, logical ordering of ideas and your ability to support
your arguments with quotes from literature. These objectives will be measured by the ‘closeness of fit’
to meeting the assessment task, assessment requirements and marking criteria.
Please note that there is a wealth of material available on the Moodle Unit website that you should
use to help you through the process of searching for and gathering relevant information, evaluating
that information and writing your report.
General Assessment Criteria
Assessments provide the opportunity for students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills to achieve
the required standard. To do this, assessment responses need to be both clear and easy to understand. If
not, the University cannot determine that students have demonstrated their knowledge and skills.
Assessments will, therefore, be marked accordingly including the potential for 0 (zero) marks where
relevant.
The report must focus on the case study scenario given in the Assessment Task section. Any assessment
items that do not address the case study scenario may be awarded 0 (zero) marks.
If you use Track Changes when writing your report you must ensure that the submitted document is the
final and correct version of the document. That is, if your submitted report contains Track Changes or
Comments or any other editing marks it may be awarded 0 (zero) marks. It is your responsibility to
submit the final and correct version of your report.
2
The length of the report must be within the recommended range. If the report exceeds the maximum
word count the marker will stop marking after 2750 words.
Moodle auto-submits draft files that are in Moodle at the originally set deadlines. Files that are autosubmitted
will not be reverted to draft status except in extenuating circumstances (evidence required). It
is your responsibility not to leave draft assessments in Moodle at the due date and time if the files are
not ready to be submitted for marking. However, late submissions may attract penalties.
Assessment Task
Students are required to write an academic report as per the format outlined in chapter 5 of the
textbook. The report must follow the CQU APA referencing style. See the American Psychological
Association (APA) abridged guide updated T

Your Task
Your task is to create a Professional Workshop.
Assessment Description
This individual assignment requires students to demonstrate a comprehensive understanding
of Learning Outcomes 1 to 5 covering topics between Weeks 1 to12.
Assessment Instructions
You are an independent consultant and are asked to prepare a Professional
Development Workshop on one of the topics discussed in class during weeks 1 to
12. Develop an Interactive Workshop based on what you have learned in this subject.
1. Part 1 of the assignment consists of a schedule of the practical activities of the workshop
(approximately 1200 words) and is based on topics discussed in class. You can be as creative
as you wish in this part as long as you apply practically the chosen topic in the form of a
professional workshop.
Please take care to consider the following factors when designing your workshop:
The inclusion of activities that are relevant and interesting.
The appropriate timing allocated to each of those activities.
The way in which the topics and activities are integrated.
The instructions that ensure the activities are facilitated well.
The potential barriers to the successful implementation of the activities.
The diversity of activities to suit the varied personalities of the participants.
Attachments:
3089537_1_MBA502-T1-2019-Assessment-03–2-.pdf
3089537_2_New-folder.zip

You have recently been employed as a Business Analyst and your boss has decided to send you on a
short Enterprise Systems course. You have now returned from your course ad would like to demonstrate
your learning. Create an e-portfolio to provide a synopsis and reflection on your learning during
the course. You have been requested to document your learning in a portfolio that can be displayed on
your company’s intranet or knowledge portal. This way, the entire organization can access the document
and share in your newly acquired knowledge.
This assessment task will address the following ILOs:
• Evaluate and Integrate several information sources in analysing Enterprise Systems
• Describe the role of enterprise systems as part of the larger IT infrastructure of large scale organisations.
• Identify relevant considerations in the implementation of Enterprise Systems.
• Demonstrate communication skills to present a coordinated, coherent and independent exposition of knowledge
and ideas in dealing with Enterprise Systems.
Time allocation: Approximately 30-40 hours
Weighting: 30%
Submission: Using your student e-Portfolio account, create a link from Moodle to your Mahara page as
indicated on the submission link. You are required to prepare your responses to the assessment tasks as a
page in your Mahara e-Portfolio. (To be submitted in Week 11)
Referencing: Your portfolio should be a synthesis of ideas from a variety of sources expressed in your
own words. A minimum of 10 references is recommended. You should use the APA referencing style.
The University has published a style guide to help students correctly reference and cite information they
use in assignments (American Psychological Association (APA) citation style:
https://federation.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/313328/FEDUNI-GENERAL-GUIDE-TOREFERENCING-2016-EDITION_ed.pdf
Enterprise Systems
ePortfolio
Enterprise Systems Assessment Task
The Context
Intended Learning Outcomes (ILOs)
Assessment Guidelines
Marking Criteria: A passing grade will be awarded to assignments adequately addressing all
assessment criteria. Higher grades require better quality and more effort. For example, a minimum is set
on the wider reading required. A student reading vastly more than this minimum will be better prepared
to discuss the issues in depth and consequently their report is likely to be of a higher quality. So before
submitting, please read through the assessment criteria very carefully. Marking guides are provided.
Feedback: Feedback will be provided by the lecturer/tutor via Mahara, and mark via Moodle, no later
than 2 weeks from the submission date.
An ePortfolio is a collection of digital files, images, videos that showcase competencies, skills,
application of knowledge and learning journey. The use of ePortfolios in various industries, disciplines
and processes is increasing world-wide, and is in some case the ‘norm’ for job applications or for
displaying educational learnings.
Attachments:
3089490_1_Enterprise-Systems-Portfolio.pdf

Assignment Questions
Part A
Q1. In relation to access to wireless network (e.g, WiFi), answer the following questions:
a. What is media access control and why is it important?
b. Give one example each of the controlled access methods and contention based media
access methods?
c. When might one access method be preferred over another in a network, and why?
d. Under what conditions do contention-based media access control techniques
outperform controlled-access techniques (i.e., have lower response time)? Explain.
[3+2+2.5+2.5=10 marks]
Q2. Four users (U1, U2, U3 and U4) are using CDMA access techniques to transmit data to their
respective receivers (U1->R1, U2->R2, U3->R3 and U4->R4). The followings are the
spreading codes and the data that each user wants to send.
Attachments:
3089473_1_Assignment2-2019-Mob-net—wireless.pdf