Tag: Clinical-Nursing

  • NURS 6560 mind term exam questions and answers

    NURS 6560 mind term exam questions and answers

    Question 1

    S. is a 59-year-old female who has been followed for several years for aortic regurgitation. Serial echocardiography has demonstrated normal ventricular function, but the patient was lost to follow-up for the last 16 months and now presents complaining of activity intolerance and weight gain. Physical examination reveals a grade IV/VI diastolic aortic murmur and 2+ lower extremity edema to the midcalf. The AGACNP considers which of the following as the most appropriate management strategy?

    A.

    B.

    C.

    Begin an angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor

    D.

    Surgical consultation and intervention

    ORDER YOUR PAPER OR EXAM NOW

    Question 2

    An ascending thoracic aneurysm of > 5.5 cm is universally considered an indication for surgical repair, given the poor outcomes with sudden rupture. Regardless of the aneurysm’s size, all of the following are additional indications for immediate operation except:

    A.

    Comorbid Marfan’s syndrome

    B.

    Enlargement of > 1 cm since diagnosis

    C.

    D.

    Question 3

    Jasmine is a 31-year-old female who presents with neck pain. She has a long history of injection drug use and admits to injecting opiates into her neck. Physical examination reveals diffuse tracking and scarring. Today Jasmine has a distinct inability to turn her neck without pain, throat pain, and a temperature of 102.1°F. She appears ill and has foul breath. In order to evaluate for a deep neck space infection, the AGACNP orders:NURS 6560 mind term exam questions and answers

    A.

    B.

    C.

    White blood cell (WBC) differential

    D.

    Aspiration and culture of fluid

     

    Question 3

    Jasmine is a 31-year-old female who presents with neck pain. She has a long history of injection drug use and admits to injecting opiates into her neck. Physical examination reveals diffuse tracking and scarring. Today Jasmine has a distinct inability to turn her neck without pain, throat pain, and a temperature of 102.1°F. She appears ill and has foul breath. In order to evaluate for a deep neck space infection, the AGACNP orders: NURS 6560 mind term exam questions and answers

    A.

    Anteroposterior neck radiography

    B.

    C.

    White blood cell (WBC) differential

    D.

    Aspiration and culture of fluid

     

    Question 4

    Mr. Draper is a 39-year-old male recovering from an extended abdominal procedure. As a result of a serious motor vehicle accident, he has had repair of a small bowel perforation, splenectomy, and repair of a hepatic laceration. He will be on total parenteral nutrition postoperatively. The AGACNP recognizes that the most common complications of parenteral nutrition are a consequence of: NURS 6560 mind term exam questions and answers

    A.

    B.

    Resultant diarrhea and volume contraction

    C.

    The central venous line used for infusion

    D.

     

    Question 5

     

    Mr. Mettenberger is being discharged following his hospitalization for reexpansion of his second spontaneous pneumothorax this year. He has stopped smoking and does not appear to have any overt risk factors. While doing his discharge teaching, the AGACNP advises Mr. Mettenberger that his current risk for another pneumothorax is:

    A.

    < 10% B. 25-50% C. 50-75% D. > 90%

    Question 6

    One of the earliest findings for a patient in hypovolemic shock is:

    A.

    A drop in systolic blood pressure (SBP) < 10 mm Hg for > 1 minute when sitting up

    B.

    C.

    NURS 6560 mind term exam questions and answers

    D.

    Hemoglobin and hematocrit (H&H) < 9 g/dL and 27%     Question 7 Traumatic diaphragmatic hernias present in both acute and chronic forms. Patients with a more chronic form are most likely to be present with: A. Respiratory insufficiency B. C. Bowel obstruction D. A     Question 8 The AGACNP is managing a patient in the ICU who is being treated for a pulmonary embolus. Initially the patient was stable, awake, alert, and oriented, but during the last several hours the patient has become increasingly lethargic. At change of shift, the oncoming staff nurse appreciates a profound change in the patient’s mental status from the day before. Vital signs and hemodynamic parameters are as follows: NURS 6560 mind term exam questions and answers BP 88/54 mm Hg Pulse 110 bpm Respiratory rate 22 breaths per minute SaO2 93% on a 50% mask Systemic vascular resistance (SVR) 1600 dynes ∙ sec/cm 5 Cardiac index 1.3 L/min. NURS 6560 mind term exam questions and answers Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) 8 mm Hg This clinical picture is most consistent with which shock state? A. Hypovolemic B. Cardiogenic C. D.   Question 9 When counseling patients to prevent postoperative pulmonary complications, the AGACNP knows that with respect to smoking cessation, the American College of Surgeons and National Surgical Quality Improvement Program guidelines are clear that patients who stop smoking _____ weeks before surgery have no increased risk of smoking-related pulmonary complications. NURS 6560 mind term exam questions and answers A. B. 4 C. D. 8   Question 10 Mitch C. is a 39-year-old male who is brought to the ED by paramedics. According to the report of a neighbor, Mitch was distraught over a breakup with his fiancée and attempted to commit suicide by mixing some chemicals from under his kitchen sink and drinking them; afterward he changed his mind and knocked on his neighbor’s door asking for help. Mitch is awake but stuporous, and the neighbor has no idea what he drank. Visual inspection of his mouth and oropharynx reveals some edema and erythema. He is coughing and has large amounts of pooling saliva. Mitch is not capable of answering questions but he appears in pain. Endoscopy reveals full thickness mucosal injury with mucosal sloughing, ulceration, and exudate. The AGACNP knows that the appropriate course of treatment must include: A. At least 6 hours of observation in the emergency department B. C. Aggressive fluid resuscitation D.   Question 11 Jared V. is a 35-year-old male who presents for evaluation of a dry cough. He reports feeling well overall but notices that he gets out of breath more easily than he used to when playing soccer. A review of systems yields results that are essentially benign, although the patient does admit to an unusual rash on his legs. Physical examination reveals scattered erythematous nodules on both shins. There is no drainage, discomfort, or itch. Additionally, diffuse, mildly enlarged lymph nodes are appreciated bilaterally. Results of a comprehensive metabolic panel and complete blood count are within normal limits. Twelve-lead ECG reveals sinus bradycardia at 58 bpm. Chest radiography reveals bilateral hilar and mediastinal lymphadenopathy. The AGACNP suspects: NURS 6560 mind term exam questions and answers A. B. Pulmonary fibrosis C. D. Lung carcinoma NURS 6560 mind term exam questions and answers

  • Assessment and Care of Patients with Neurologic and Orthopedic Conditions and Plastic/Reconstructive Surgery Essay Assignment Papers

    Assessment and Care of Patients with Neurologic and Orthopedic Conditions and Plastic/Reconstructive Surgery Essay Assignment Papers

    Week 10: Assessment and Care of Patients with Neurologic and Orthopedic Conditions and Plastic/Reconstructive Surgery

    Jill Joyce experienced years of back pain that prevented her from completing even the most basic tasks. Bulging discs and degenerative changes in her spine were affecting nerve function, which caused pain that could be alleviated only with surgery (Healthy Life, 2008). Like Jill’s back pain, many conditions related to neurology, orthopedics, and plastic/reconstructive surgery may affect patients’ function and mobility. In your role as advanced practice nurse, you must not only diagnose and treat these patients but also help them manage changes in their function and mobility. Assessment and Care of Patients with Neurologic and Orthopedic Conditions and Plastic/Reconstructive Surgery Essay Assignment Papers

    Learning Objectives

    ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW

    By the end of this week, students will:

    Evaluate medical and surgical patients with conditions related to neurology, orthopedics, and plastic/reconstructive surgery

    Develop differential diagnoses for medical and surgical patients with conditions related to neurology, orthopedics, and plastic/reconstructive surgery

    Develop treatment plans for medical and surgical patients with conditions related to neurology, orthopedics, and plastic/reconstructive surgery

    Learning Resources

    Required Readings

    Colyar, M. R. (2015).
    Advanced practice nursing procedures
    (1st ed.). Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis Company.

     

    Chapter 28, “Bone Marrow Aspiration and Biopsy”

    Chapter 29, “ Lumbar Puncture”

    Chapter 31, “Arthrocentesis”

    Chapter 32, “Assessment for Compartment Syndrome and Pressure Testing”

    Chapter 35, “Dislocation Reduction”

    Chapter 36, “Ganglion Cyst Aspiration and Injection”

    Doherty, G. M. (2015).
    Current diagnosis and treatment: Surgery
    (14th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.

    Chapter 36, “Neurosurgery”

    Chapter 40, “Orthopedic Surgery”

    Chapter 41, “Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery”

    Chapter 42, “Hand Surgery”

    Weber, E. C., Vilensky, J. A., & Fog, A. M. (2013).
    Practical radiology: A symptom-based approach.
    Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis Company.

     

    Chapter 2, “Shoulder, Pelvis, and Limbs”

    Chapter 3, “Spine and Spinal Cord”

    Chapter 4, “Brain”

    Chapter 11, “Imaging of Bone Disease and Endocrine Disorders”

    Kuntz, A. F., Lai, W.-S., Norton, P. T., Yao, L. L., & Gay, S. B. (2013).
    Skeletal trauma radiology.
    Retrieved from http://www.med-ed.virginia.edu/courses/rad/ext/index.html

    Shonka, D. C., Gay, S. B., Marx, W. F., Frederick, J. A., Vu, Q. D. M., Higginbotham, J., … Rehm, P. K. (2013).
    Introduction to head CT.
    Retrieved from http://www.med-ed.virginia.edu/courses/rad/headct/index.html

    Required Media

    i-Human Patient Cases. (2014). Retrieved from https://ih2.i-human.com/users/sign_in

    AshtonMoh. (2011).
    Lumbar puncture 2
    [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QoUGM4wqUU0

    Doe, J. (2012).
    Knee aspiration
    [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jx8HmJJOGas

    Optional Resources

    American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. (2015).
    Broken bones & injuries.
    Retrieved from http://orthoinfo.aaos.org/menus/injury.cfm

    American Society of Plastic Surgeons. (2015).
    Evidence-based practice guidelines and practice parameters.
    Retrieved from http://www.plasticsurgery.org/for-medical-professionals/legislation-and-advocacy/health-policy-resources/evidence-based-guidelinespractice-parameters.html

    Boyd, A. S., Benjamin, H. J., & Asplund, C. (2009). Splints and casts: Indications and methods.
    American Family Physician,
    80(5), 491–499. Retrieved from http://www.aafp.org/afp/2009/0901/p491.html

    Discussion Part I: Neurologic and Orthopedic Conditions and Plastic/Reconstructive Surgery

    This week, you study neurologic and orthopedic conditions with plastic surgery considerations. Both neurologic and orthopedic conditions are seen in the trauma areas of the hospital. These conditions encompass cardiovascular, pulmonary, and metabolic aspects of care in the ICU. For this Discussion, focus on adolescent patients, and consider potential diagnoses, treatment, and/or referral options for the patients in the following 3 case studies.

    Case Study 1

    A 17-year-old male was celebrating his birthday with friends and alcohol. At one point he jumped into the hotel pool three stories below, hitting the side of the pool with his chest. EMS arrived and packaged him with spinal support. He arrives in the ER with breathing difficulty, chest pain, GCS 10, and O2 sat of 94%. You do initial assessment in the first 10 minutes and find that his chest is asymmetric for breathing and contusions are noted all over his chest. His CXR shows multiple rib fractures on both sides and pulmonary contusions. His cervical spine is stable in a collar. His thoracic and lumbar films are negative for fractures. In the next hours, what are your priorities, and what plan would you have for this patient as he moves to the ICU? At what stage of development is he, and how does that affect his care? Assessment and Care of Patients with Neurologic and Orthopedic Conditions and Plastic/Reconstructive Surgery Essay Assignment Papers

    Case Study 2

    A 13-year-old female restrained passenger of a vehicle was involved in an MVA at 60 mph on the highway. The vehicle experienced a frontal impact. The patient arrived in the ER with closed fractures of the left tibia and fibula with angulation, dislocation of the right ankle, multiple pelvic fractures, and femur fracture on the left side. Her BP is 92/54 with pulse of 130. What is your plan for this patient, and what are the considerations to prevent further morbidity? At what stage of development is she, and how does that impact her care?

    Case Study 3

    A 19-year-old male private in the U.S. Air Force was driving with friends when they dared him to “surf the car.” He fell off the roof of the car while it was moving at a speed of approximately 40 mph. He landed face first. He is now in the ICU with a closed head injury. His intracranial pressure is elevated, and his pupillary response is slowing. At this time, what medications do you recommend, and what other medical treatments do you recommend? In addition, after the acute situation is controlled and the patient awakens, what medication do you use for his agitation?

    To prepare:

    Review and select 
    1
     of the 3 provided case studies. Analyze the patient information.

    Consider a differential diagnosis for the patient in the case study you selected. Think about the most likely diagnosis for the patient.

    Think about a treatment and management plan for the patient. Be sure to consider appropriate dosages for any recommended pharmacologic and/or nonpharmacologic treatments.

    Consider strategies for educating patients and families on the treatment and management of the trauma care.

    By Day 3

    Post
     an explanation of the differential diagnosis for the patient in the case study you selected. Explain which is the most likely diagnosis for the patient and why. Include an explanation of unique characteristics of the disorder you identified as the primary diagnosis. Then, explain a treatment and management plan for the patient, including appropriate dosages for any recommended treatments. Finally, explain strategies for educating patients and families on the treatment and management of neurologic and orthopedic conditions.

    Read
     a selection of your colleagues’ responses.

    By Day 6

    Respond
     to at least 
    two
     of your colleagues 
    on 2 different days in both of the ways
     listed below. Respond to colleagues who selected different case studies from yours.

    Describe how culture might affect the diagnosis, management, and follow-up care of patients with the neurological, orthopedic, or plastics disorders your colleagues discussed.

    Based on your personal and/or professional experiences, expand on your colleagues’ postings by providing additional insights or different perspectives.​ Assessment and Care of Patients with Neurologic and Orthopedic Conditions and Plastic/Reconstructive Surgery Essay Assignment Papers

    Discussion Part II: Pharmacology

    To prepare:

    Read the following articles to enhance your knowledge of commonly prescribed medications:

    Family Practice Notebook. (2015).
    Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory.
    Retrieved from http://www.fpnotebook.com/Pharm/Analgesic/NnstrdlAntInflmtry.htm

    Press, C. D. (2013, September 10).
    Infiltrative administration of local anesthetic agents.
    Retrieved from http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/149178-overview

    All of the following groups of medications are commonly prescribed in the acute care setting. Choose one of the topics below to discuss. If it is a medication group, select a specific drug within that group. (This is a good way for you to prepare for clinical practice, because you will get to know the drugs you will prescribe for patients.). Focus your discussion on the hospital or ICU setting and IV usage.

    Glycopeptides

    Oxazolidinones (Bs)

    Monobactams

    Ansamycins

    Metronidazole

    Lincosamides (Bs)

    Tinidazole

    Lidocaine

    Marcaine

    NSAIDs

    Note:
     When sharing your initial post, select a topic that has not yet been discussed. If all topics have been discussed, then you may select that topic again, but select a different drug within the medication group.

    By Day 3

    For this Discussion, address 1 of the following options:

    Option 1

    Post
     a description of a patient you have taken care of (inpatient as an RN, or as an NP student) who has been prescribed the medication you selected. Include the scenario, indication, dosing, complications, and outcome. Then explain whether or not you would have ordered the same drug and same dose. Assessment and Care of Patients with Neurologic and Orthopedic Conditions and Plastic/Reconstructive Surgery Essay Assignment Papers

    Option 2

    Conduct an evidence-based drug search on the drug you selected and post an explanation of any possible issues. Are there any drug interactions? Any black box warnings? To what type of patient would you prescribe this medication?

    Option 3

    Post
     an explanation of the properties of the drug you selected, including usages and dosing in the hospital or ICU. Describe a patient you would prescribe this medication to. Assessment and Care of Patients with Neurologic and Orthopedic Conditions and Plastic/Reconstructive Surgery Essay Assignment Papers

    Note:
     To be considered as one of your required responses, your pharmacology rationale must include a supporting reference.

    Note:
     For this Discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the “Post to Discussion Question” link and then select “Create Thread” to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click on Submit, you cannot delete or edit your own posts, and you cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking on Submit!

    Submission and Grading Information

    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Week 10 Discussion Rubric

    Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6

    To participate in this Discussion:

    Week 10 Discussion

    Assignment: Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients – Neurologic and Orthopedic Conditions and Plastic/Reconstructive Surgery

    Neurologic and orthopedic conditions and plastic/reconstructive surgery often affect patients’ function and mobility. Changes in function and mobility sometimes are subtle and might not be identified immediately, requiring you to monitor patients closely for signs and symptoms. For this Assignment, as you examine this week’s i-Human patient case study, consider how you might evaluate and treat pre- and post-operative patients who present with neurologic and orthopedic conditions and plastic/reconstructive surgery.

    To prepare:

    Review this week’s Learning Resources. With neurology, orthopedics, and plastic/reconstructive surgery in mind, consider how to assess, diagnose, and treat patients in pre- and post-operative care.

    Review this week’s i-Human case study. Based on the patient information provided, think about the health history you would need to collect from the patient. Assessment and Care of Patients with Neurologic and Orthopedic Conditions and Plastic/Reconstructive Surgery Essay Assignment Papers

    Consider what physical exams and diagnostic tests would be appropriate to gather more information about the patient’s condition. Reflect on how the results would be used to make a diagnosis.

    Identify three to five possible conditions to consider in a differential diagnosis for the patient.

    Consider the patient’s diagnosis. Think about clinical guidelines that might support this diagnosis.

    Develop a treatment plan for the patient that includes health promotion and patient education strategies for medical and surgical patients with conditions related to neurology, orthopedics, and plastic/reconstructive surgery. Assessment and Care of Patients with Neurologic and Orthopedic Conditions and Plastic/Reconstructive Surgery Essay Assignment Papers

    To complete:

    As you interact with this week’s i-Human patient, complete the assigned case study. For guidance on using i-Human, refer to the 
    i-Human Patients Case Player Student Manual
     in the Week 2 Learning Resources.

    By Day 7

    This Assignment is due.

    Grading Information

    Week 10 i-Human Rubric

    Practicum Reminder: Week 10 Time Log

    Time Logs

    You are required to keep a log of the time you spend related to your practicum experience 
    and enter every patient you see each day.
     You can access your time log from the Welcome Page in your Meditrek account. You will track time individually for each patient you work with. Please make sure to continuously input your hours throughout the term. Assessment and Care of Patients with Neurologic and Orthopedic Conditions and Plastic/Reconstructive Surgery Essay Assignment Papers

    Assessment and Care of Patients with Neurologic and Orthopedic Conditions and Plastic/Reconstructive Surgery Essay Assignment Papers

    Application_Rubric

    Novice

    Emerging

    Proficient

    HPI Statement

    0 
    (0%)
     – 5 
    (5%)

    Poorly written HPI statement. Incomplete ideas and sentences. Lacks basic history taking skills

    6 
    (6%)
     – 10 
    (10%)

    Well written HPI statement but may be missing 1-2 key components from the history

    11 
    (11%)
     – 15 
    (15%)

    Clearly written HPI statement with comprehensive information gathering from case questions.

    Objective testing and physical exam

    0 
    (0%)
     – 5 
    (5%)

    Poorly written physical examination. May be missing 3 or more key exam findings that are critical to patient’s diagnosis. Includes 3 or more inappropriate exams or tests.

    6 
    (6%)
     – 10 
    (10%)

    Well written physical examination but may be missing 1-2 key exam findings critical to patient’s diagnosis. May include 1-2 unnecessary exams or tests.

    11 
    (11%)
     – 15 
    (15%)

    Clearly written physical examination covering all critical components of a focus exam. Tests that are ordered are appropriate for patient and cost effective.

    Assessment

    0 
    (0%)
     – 10 
    (10%)

    Differential diagnosis list too brief and inconclusive. May be missing 3 or more critical components. Priority list may be out of order. Primary diagnosis may be wrong.

    11 
    (11%)
     – 19 
    (19%)

    Well written differential diagnoses. May be missing 1-2 critical components. Correct primary diagnosis identified.

    20 
    (20%)
     – 25 
    (25%)

    Clearly written differential diagnoses. Primary diagnosis identified.

    Plan for patient

    0 
    (0%)
     – 15 
    (15%)

    Poorly written plan. May be missing 3 or more key issues that are critical to patient’s diagnosis.

    16 
    (16%)
     – 25 
    (25%)

    Well written plan but may be missing 1-2 key issues critical to patient’s diagnosis.

    26 
    (26%)
     – 30 
    (30%)

    Clearly written plan covering all critical components for patient’s final diagnosis.

    Clinical Questions

    0 
    (0%)
     – 10 
    (10%)

    Correctly answered 0-69% of the clinical question

    11 
    (11%)
     – 13 
    (13%)

    Correctly answered 70-89% of the clinical question

    14 
    (14%)
     – 15 
    (15%)

    Correctly answered 90-100% of the clinical questions

     

    Assessment and Care of Patients with Neurologic and Orthopedic Conditions and Plastic/Reconstructive Surgery Essay Assignment Papers

    Discussion_Rubric

    Grid View

    List View

    Outstanding Performance

    Excellent Performance

    Competent Performance

    Room for Improvement

    Poor Performance

    Content-Main Posting

    30 
    (30%)
     – 30 
    (30%)

    -Main posting addresses all criteria with 75% of post exceptional depth and breadth supported by credible references

    27 
    (27%)
     – 29 
    (29%)

    -Main posting addresses all criteria with 75% of post exceptional depth and breadth supported by credible references

    24 
    (24%)
     – 26 
    (26%)

    Main posting meets expectations. All criteria are addressed with 50% containing good breadth and depth.

    21 
    (21%)
     – 23 
    (23%)

    Main posting addresses most of the criteria. One to two criterion are not addressed or superficially addressed.

    0 
    (0%)
     – 20 
    (20%)

    Main posting does not address all of criteria, superficially addresses criteria. Two or more criteria are not addressed.

    Course Requirements and Attendance

    20 
    (20%)
     – 20 
    (20%)

    -Responds to two colleagues’ with posts that are reflective, are justified with credible sources, and ask questions that extend the discussion.

    18 
    (18%)
     – 19 
    (19%)

    -Responds to two colleagues’ with posts that are reflective, are justified with credible sources, and ask questions that extend the discussion.

    16 
    (16%)
     – 17 
    (17%)

    Responds to a minimum of two colleagues’ posts, are reflective, and ask questions that extend the discussion. One post is justified by a credible source.

    14 
    (14%)
     – 15 
    (15%)

    Responds to less than two colleagues’ posts. Posts are on topic, may have some depth, or questions. May extend the discussion. No credible sources are cited

    0 
    (0%)
     – 13 
    (13%)

    Responds to less than two colleagues’ posts. Posts may not be on topic, lack depth, do not pose questions that extend the discussion

    Scholarly Writing Quality

    30 
    (30%)
     – 30 
    (30%)

    -The main posting clearly addresses the discussion criteria and is written concisely. The main posting is cited with more than two credible references that adhere to the correct format per the APA Manual 6th Edition. No spelling or grammatical errors. ***The use of scholarly sources or real life experiences needs to be included to deepen the discussion and earn points in reply to fellow students.

    27 
    (27%)
     – 29 
    (29%)

    -The main posting clearly addresses the discussion criteria and is written concisely. The main posting is cited with more than two credible references that adhere to the correct format per the APA Manual 6th Edition. No spelling or grammatical errors.

    24 
    (24%)
     – 26 
    (26%)

    -The main posting clearly addresses the discussion criteria and is written concisely. The main posting is cited with a minimum of two current credible references that adhere to the correct format per the APA Manual 6th Edition. Contains one to two spelling or grammatical errors. Assessment and Care of Patients with Neurologic and Orthopedic Conditions and Plastic/Reconstructive Surgery Essay Assignment Papers

    21 
    (21%)
     – 23 
    (23%)

    -The main posting is not clearly addressing the discussion criteria and is not written concisely. The main posting is cited with less than two credible references that may lack credibility and/or do not adhere to the correct format per the APA Manual 6th Edition. Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

    0 
    (0%)
     – 20 
    (20%)

    -The main posting is disorganized and has one reference that may lack credibility and does not adhere to the correct format per the APA Manual 6th Edition or has zero credible references. Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

    Professional

    Communication

    Effectiveness

    20 
    (20%)
     – 20 
    (20%)

    -Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues and response to faculty questions are answered if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas effectively written in Standard Edited English -Responses posted in the discussion demonstrate effective professional communication through deep reflective discussion which leads to an exchange of ideas and focus on the weekly discussion topic.

    18 
    (18%)
     – 19 
    (19%)

    -Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. -Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas effectively written in Standard Edited English -Responses posted in the discussion demonstrate effective professional communication through deep reflective discussion which leads to an exchange of ideas and focus on the weekly discussion topic . -Responses are cited with at least one credible reference per post and a probing question that extends the discussion. Adheres to the correct format per the APA Manual 6th Edition. No spelling or grammatical errors.

    16 
    (16%)
     – 17 
    (17%)

    -Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas effectively written in Standard Edited English. -Responses posted in the discussion demonstrate effective professional communication through deep reflective discussion which leads to an exchange of ideas and focus on the weekly discussion topic. -Responses are cited with at least one credible and/or contain probing questions that extends the discussion. Adheres to the correct format per the APA Manual 6th Edition. May have one to two spelling or grammatical errors.

    14 
    (14%)
     – 15 
    (15%)

    -Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Provides opinions that may not be concise or ideas not effectively written in Standard Edited English. -Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication that does not extend the discussion, leads to an exchange of ideas and/or not focused on the weekly discussion topic. -Responses are not cited and/or do not contain a probing question. May not adhere to the correct format per the APA Manual 6th Edition. May have more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

    0 
    (0%)
     – 13 
    (13%)

    -Communication may lack professional tone or be disrespectful to colleagues. Provides opinions that may not be concise or ideas not effectively written in Standard Edited English -Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication through discussion that does not extend the discussion, do not lead to an exchange of ideas and/or not focused on the weekly discussion topic. -Responses are not cited and do not contain a probing question. May not adhere to the correct format per the APA Manual 6th Edition. May have multiple spelling or grammatical errors.

    Timely Submission

    0 
    (0%)
     – 0 
    (0%)

    All criteria met: Initial post submitted on time. Response to two peer initial posts. Response on 3 separate days.

    -5 
    (-5%)
     – 0 
    (0%)

    5 points deducted for responding to less than two peers or 5 points deducted for responding less than three days

    -10 
    (-10%)
     – -5 
    (-5%)

    5 points deducted for responding to less than two peers and 5 points deducted for responding less than three days

    -10 
    (-10%)
     – -10 
    (-10%)

    10 points deducted for Initial post submitted late

    -20 
    (-20%)
     – -15 
    (-15%)

    Initial post submitted late and 5 points deducted for responding to less than two peers and/ or 5 points deducted for responding less than three days

    Assessment and Care of Patients with Neurologic and Orthopedic Conditions and Plastic/Reconstructive Surgery Essay Assignment Papers

  • Assessment and Care of Patients With Adrenal and Urogynecologic Conditions Essay Assignment Papers

    Assessment and Care of Patients With Adrenal and Urogynecologic Conditions Essay Assignment Papers

    Week 9: Assessment and Care of Patients With Adrenal and Urogynecologic Conditions

    From severe abdominal pain to urinary frequency, urinary incontinence, sexual health issues, and the overproduction of hormones, adrenal and urogynecologic symptoms often cause frustration and embarrassment for patients. These feelings might cause patients to hold back information, making assessment and diagnosis of adrenal and urogynecologic conditions challenging. Because patients may require surgery to minimize the impact of these conditions on their daily lives, it is essential that you establish trust with patients and carefully ask questions to quantify complaints appropriately.

    This week, as you examine the pre- and post-operative care of patients with adrenals and urogynecology conditions, you explore strategies for assessment, diagnosis, and treatment.

    ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW

    Learning Objectives

    By the end of this week, students will:

    Evaluate medical and surgical patients with adrenal and urogynecologic conditions

    Develop differential diagnoses for medical and surgical patients with adrenal and urogynecologic conditions

    Develop treatment plans for medical and surgical patients with adrenal and urogynecologic conditions

    Photo Credit: Andrew Brookes/Cultura/Getty Images. Assessment and Care of Patients With Adrenal and Urogynecologic Conditions Essay Assignment Papers

     Learning Resources

    Required Readings

    Colyar, M. R. (2015).
    Advanced practice nursing procedures
    (1st ed.). Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis Company.

    Chapter 42, “Breast Biopsy (Fine Needle Aspiration)”

    Chapter 44, “Colposcopy (Endocervical Curettage and Cervical Biopsy)”

    Chapter 45, “Endometrial Biopsy”

    Chapter 49, “Bartholin Cyst Abscess (Incision and Drainage)”

    Chapter 51, “Cervical Lesions—Cryotherapy”

    Chapter 52, “Circumcision and Dorsal Penile Nerve Block”

    Chapter 58, “Paracervical Nerve Block”

    Chapter 61, “Vasectomy”

    Doherty, G. M. (2015).
    Current diagnosis and treatment: Surgery
    (14th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.

    Chapter 17, “Breast Disorders”

    Chapter 33, “Adrenals”

    Chapter 38, “Urology”

    Chapter 39, “Gynecology”

    Weber, E. C., Vilensky, J. A., & Fog, A. M. (2013).
    Practical radiology: A symptom-based approach.
    Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis Company.

     

    Chapter 7, “Breast”

    Chapter 9, “Male and Female Urinary Tract and Male Genital Tract”

    Chapter 10, “Female Pelvic Imaging”

    American Cancer Society. (2014).
    American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer.
    Retrieved from http://www.cancer.org/healthy/findcancerearly/cancerscreeningguidelines/american-cancer-society-guidelines-for-the-early-detection-of-cancer. Assessment and Care of Patients With Adrenal and Urogynecologic Conditions Essay Assignment Papers

    Required Media

    i-Human Patient Cases. (2014). Retrieved from https://ih2.i-human.com/users/sign_in

    Optional Resources

    Massad, L. S., Einstein, M. H., Huh, W. K., Katki, H. A., Kinney, W. K., Schiffman, M. … Lawson, H. W. (2013). 2012 updated consensus guidelines for the management of abnormal cervical cancer screening tests and cancer precursors.
    Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease, 17
    (5), S1–S27.

    Discussion Part I: Assessment and Care of Patients With Adrenal and Urogynecologic Conditions

    Many genitourinary (GU) disorders such as kidney disease start developing during adolescence (Johns Hopkins Children’s Center, 2010). This early onset of disease makes it essential for you, as the advanced practice nurse caring for adolescent patients, to identify potential signs and symptoms. Although some adolescent GU disorders require long-term treatment and management, other disorders such as urinary tract infections are more common and frequently require only minor interventions. In your role with adolescent patients, you must evaluate symptoms and determine whether to treat patients or refer them for specialized care. For this Discussion, consider potential diagnoses, treatment, and/or referral options for the patients in the following 3 case studies. Assessment and Care of Patients With Adrenal and Urogynecologic Conditions Essay Assignment Papers

    Case Study 1

    Alicia is an 18-year-old female who is brought into urgent care by her mother. She is complaining of dizziness. She recently started to lift weights for softball season. She has been healthy up to this point. Vitals are: temp 101.9°F, HR 120, RR 24, BP 90/54. She has lower extremity edema and decreased skin turgor. She states that her shoulders, thighs, and lower back hurt. She is having trouble moving her arms and legs. She also complains of vague abdominal pain, with nausea and vomiting. Labs came back with CK 10,000, uric acid 40 mg/dl, WBC 14.3, BUN:creatinine ratio 6:1, K 5.8. Urinalysis shows a presence of myoglobin of more than 25. Assessment and Care of Patients With Adrenal and Urogynecologic Conditions Essay Assignment Papers

    Case Study 2

    Mark is a 15-year-old male with a complaint of acute left scrotal pain with nausea. The pain began approximately 6 hours ago as a dull ache and gradually has worsened such that he can no longer stand without doubling over. He is afebrile and in marked pain. Physical exam results are negative except for elevation of the left testicle, diffuse scrotal edema, and the presence of a blue dot sign. Assessment and Care of Patients With Adrenal and Urogynecologic Conditions Essay Assignment Papers

    Case Study 3

    Maya is a 16-year-old female who presents to the ER for urinary pain. She is a healthy adolescent with complaints of lower abdominal pain, low back pain, and burning with urination. She had a fever of 102°F at home. Physical examination results are normal. Routine urinalysis indicates 2+ proteinuria; specific gravity 1.020; negative for glucose, blood. Leukocytes are moderate and nitrites, moderate. Her blood pressure is normal, and she is at the 60th percentile for height and weight. Vitals are: temp 103.1°F, HR 116, RR 18, BP 100/58. P Ox is 98% (Johns Hopkins Children’s Center, 2010).

    To prepare:

    Review and select 
    1
     of the 3 provided case studies. Analyze the patient information.

    Consider a differential diagnosis for the patient in the case study you selected. Think about the most likely diagnosis for the patient.

    Think about a treatment and management plan for the patient. Be sure to consider appropriate dosages for any recommended pharmacologic and/or nonpharmacologic treatments.

    Consider strategies for educating patients and families on the treatment and management of the genitourinary disorder.

    By Day 3

    Post
     an explanation of the differential diagnosis for the patient in the case study you selected. Explain which is the most likely diagnosis for the patient and why. Include an explanation of unique characteristics of the disorder you identified as the primary diagnosis. Then, explain a treatment and management plan for the patient, including appropriate dosages for any recommended treatments. Finally, explain strategies for educating patients and families on the treatment and management of the genitourinary disorder. Assessment and Care of Patients With Adrenal and Urogynecologic Conditions Essay Assignment Papers

    Read
     a selection of your colleagues’ responses.

    By Day 6

    Respond
     to at least 
    two
     of your colleagues on 
    2 different days in both of the ways
     listed below. Respond to colleagues who selected different case studies from yours. Assessment and Care of Patients With Adrenal and Urogynecologic Conditions Essay Assignment Papers

    Describe how culture might affect the diagnosis, management, and follow-up care of patients with the genitourinary disorders your colleagues discussed.

    Based on your personal and/or professional experiences, expand on your colleagues’ postings by providing additional insights or different perspectives.​

    Discussion Part II: Pharmacology

    Read the following articles to enhance your knowledge of commonly prescribed medications:

    Daley, B. (2015, February 23).
    Peritonitis and abdominal sepsis.
    Retrieved from http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/180234-overview

    Shahedi, K., Chudasama, Y. N., Dea, S. K., & Cooperman, A. (2015, January 14).
    Diverticulitis treatment and management.
    Retrieved from http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/173388-treatment

    Tobias, J. D., & Leder, M. (2011). Procedural sedation: A review of sedative agents, monitoring, and management of complications.
    Saudi Journal of Anasthesia, 5
    (4), 395–410. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3227310/

    All of the following groups of medications are commonly prescribed in the acute care setting. Choose one of the topics below to discuss. If it is a medication group, select a specific drug within that group. (This is a good way for you to prepare for clinical practice, because you will get to know the drugs you will prescribe for patients.). Focus your discussion on the hospital or ICU setting and IV usage.

    Sedation

    Diazepam

    Fentanyl

    Ketamine

    Lorazepam

    Midazolam

    Propofol

    Benzodiazepines

    Nonsedation

    Chlorpromazine

    Peritonitis—what antibiotics are chosen for peritonitis?

    Nerve blocks—what drugs are used with nerve blocks?

    Diverticulitis—what drugs are used with diverticulitis?

    Note:
     When sharing your initial post, select a topic that has not yet been discussed. If all topics have been discussed, then you may select that topic again, but select a different drug within the medication group. Assessment and Care of Patients With Adrenal and Urogynecologic Conditions Essay Assignment Papers

    By Day 3

    For this Discussion, address 1 of the following options:

    Option 1

    Post
     a description of a patient you have taken care of (inpatient as an RN, or as an NP student) who has been prescribed the medication you selected. Include the scenario, indication, dosing, complications, and outcome. Then explain whether or not you would have ordered the same drug and same dose.

    Option 2

    Conduct an evidence-based drug search on the drug you selected and 
    post
     an explanation of any possible issues. Are there any drug interactions? Any black box warnings? To what type of patient would you prescribe this medication?

    Option 3

    Post
     an explanation of the properties of the drug you selected, including usages and dosing in the hospital or ICU. Describe a patient to whom you would prescribe this medication.

    Note:
     To be considered as one of your required responses, your pharmacology rationale must include a supporting reference.

    Note:
     For this Discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the “Post to Discussion Question” link and then select “Create Thread” to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click on Submit, you cannot delete or edit your own posts, and you cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking on Submit! Assessment and Care of Patients With Adrenal and Urogynecologic Conditions Essay Assignment Papers

    Submission and Grading Information

    Grading Criteria

    Week 9 Discussion Rubric

    Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6

    To participate in this Discussion:

    Week 9 Discussion

    Assignment: Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients – Adrenal and Urogynecologic Conditions

    While some adrenal and urogynecologic conditions are specific to male or female patients, many are common among both. The presentations of these common conditions, however, can vary greatly depending on sex. Because such variations may lead to challenges in assessment and diagnosis, it is essential for you to have strong examination and diagnostic skills. For this Assignment, as you examine this week’s i-Human patient case study, consider how you might evaluate and treat pre- and post-operative patients who present with adrenal and urogynecologic conditions.

    To prepare:

    Review this week’s Learning Resources. With adrenal and urogynecologic conditions in mind, consider how to assess, diagnose, and treat patients in pre- and post-operative care.

    Review this week’s i-Human case study. Based on the patient information provided, think about the health history you would need to collect from the patient.

    Consider what physical exams and diagnostic tests would be appropriate to gather more information about the patient’s condition. Reflect on how the results would be used to make a diagnosis.

    Identify three to five possible conditions to consider in a differential diagnosis for the patient.

    Consider the patient’s diagnosis. Think about clinical guidelines that might support this diagnosis.

    Develop a treatment plan for the patient that includes health promotion and patient education strategies for medical and surgical patients with adrenal and urogynecologic conditions. Assessment and Care of Patients With Adrenal and Urogynecologic Conditions Essay Assignment Papers

    To complete:

    As you interact with this week’s i-Human patient, complete the assigned case study. For guidance on using i-Human, refer to the 
    i-Human Patients Case Player Student Manual
     in the Week 2 Learning Resources.

    Assessment and Care of Patients With Adrenal and Urogynecologic Conditions Essay Assignment Papers

    Discussion_Rubric

    Outstanding Performance

    Excellent Performance

    Competent Performance

    Proficient Performance

    Room for Improvement

    Main Posting:

    Response to the discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

    44 
    (44%)
     – 44 
    (44%)

    Thoroughly responds to the discussion question(s)

    is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

    supported by at least 3 current, credible sources

    40 
    (40%)
     – 43 
    (43%)

    Responds to the discussion question(s)

    is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

    75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth

    supported by at least 3 credible references

    35 
    (35%)
     – 39 
    (39%)

    Responds to most of the discussion question(s)

    is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

    50% of post has exceptional depth and breadth

    supported by at least 3 credible references

    31 
    (31%)
     – 34 
    (34%)

    Responds to some of the discussion question(s)

    one to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed

    is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis

    somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

    post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references

    0 
    (0%)
     – 30 
    (30%)

    Does not respond to the discussion question(s)

    lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria

    lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis

    does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

    contains only 1 or no credible references

    Main Posting:

    Writing

    6 
    (6%)
     – 6 
    (6%)

    Written clearly and concisely

    Contains no grammatical or spelling errors

    Fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style

    5.5 
    (5.5%)
     – 5.5 
    (5.5%)

    Written clearly and concisely

    May contain one or no grammatical or spelling error

    Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style

    5 
    (5%)
     – 5 
    (5%)

    Written concisely

    May contain one to two grammatical or spelling error

    Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style

    4.5 
    (4.5%)
     – 4.5 
    (4.5%)

    Written somewhat concisely

    May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors

    Contains some APA formatting errors

    0 
    (0%)
     – 4 
    (4%)

    Not written clearly or concisely

    Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors

    Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style

    Main Posting:

    Timely and full participation

    10 
    (10%)
     – 10 
    (10%)

    Meets requirements for timely and full participation

    posts main discussion by due date

    0 
    (0%)
     – 0 
    (0%)

    NA

    0 
    (0%)
     – 0 
    (0%)

    NA

    0 
    (0%)
     – 0 
    (0%)

    NA

    0 
    (0%)
     – 0 
    (0%)

    Does not meet requirement for full participation

    First Response:

    Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.

    9 
    (9%)
     – 9 
    (9%)

    Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings

    responds to questions posed by faculty

    the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives

    8.5 
    (8.5%)
     – 8.5 
    (8.5%)

    Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings

    7.5 
    (7.5%)
     – 8 
    (8%)

    Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting

    6.5 
    (6.5%)
     – 7 
    (7%)

    Response is on topic, may have some depth

    0 
    (0%)
     – 6 
    (6%)

    Response may not be on topic, lacks depth

    First Response:

    Writing

    6 
    (6%)
     – 6 
    (6%)

    Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues

    Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed

    Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources

    Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

    5.5 
    (5.5%)
     – 5.5 
    (5.5%)

    Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues

    Response to faculty questions are answered if posed

    Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources

    Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

    5 
    (5%)
     – 5 
    (5%)

    Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues

    Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed

    Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources

    Response is written in Standard Edited English

    4.5 
    (4.5%)
     – 4.5 
    (4.5%)

    Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication

    Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed

    Few or no credible sources are cited

    0 
    (0%)
     – 4 
    (4%)

    Responses posted in the discussion lack effective

    Response to faculty questions are missing

    No credible sources are cited

    First Response:

    Timely and full participation

    5 
    (5%)
     – 5 
    (5%)

    Meets requirements for timely and full participation

    posts by due date

    0 
    (0%)
     – 0 
    (0%)

    NA

    0 
    (0%)
     – 0 
    (0%)

    NA

    0 
    (0%)
     – 0 
    (0%)

    NA

    0 
    (0%)
     – 0 
    (0%)

    Does not meet requirement for full participation. Assessment and Care of Patients With Adrenal and Urogynecologic Conditions Essay Assignment Papers

    Second Response:

    Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.

    9 
    (9%)
     – 9 
    (9%)

    Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings * responds to questions posed by faculty

    the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives

    8.5 
    (8.5%)
     – 8.5 
    (8.5%)

    Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings

    7.5 
    (7.5%)
     – 8 
    (8%)

    Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting

    6.5 
    (6.5%)
     – 7 
    (7%)

    Response is on topic, may have some depth. Assessment and Care of Patients With Adrenal and Urogynecologic Conditions Essay Assignment Papers

    0 
    (0%)
     – 6 
    (6%)

    Response may not be on topic, lacks depth

    Second Response:

    Writing

    6 
    (6%)
     – 6 
    (6%)

    Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues

    Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed

    Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources

    Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

    5.5 
    (5.5%)
     – 5.5 
    (5.5%)

    Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues

    Response to faculty questions are answered if posed

    Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources

    Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

    5 
    (5%)
     – 5 
    (5%)

    Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues

    Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed

    Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources

    Response is written in Standard Edited English

    4.5 
    (4.5%)
     – 4.5 
    (4.5%)

    Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication

    Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed

    Few or no credible sources are cited

    0 
    (0%)
     – 4 
    (4%)

    Responses posted in the discussion lack effective

    Response to faculty questions are missing

    No credible sources are cited

    Second Response:

    Timely and full participation

    5 
    (5%)
     – 5 
    (5%)

    Meets requirements for timely and full participation

    Posts by due date

    0 
    (0%)
     – 0 
    (0%)

    NA

    0 
    (0%)
     – 0 
    (0%)

    NA

    0 
    (0%)
     – 0 
    (0%)

    NA

    0 
    (0%)
     – 0 
    (0%)

    Does not meet requirement for full participation

    Assessment and Care of Patients With Adrenal and Urogynecologic Conditions Essay Assignment Papers

    Application_Rubric ( iHuman)

     

    Novice

    Emerging

    Proficient

    HPI Statement

    0 
    (0%)
     – 5 
    (5%)

    Poorly written HPI statement. Incomplete ideas and sentences. Lacks basic history taking skills

    6 
    (6%)
     – 10 
    (10%)

    Well written HPI statement but may be missing 1-2 key components from the history

    11 
    (11%)
     – 15 
    (15%)

    Clearly written HPI statement with comprehensive information gathering from case questions.

    Objective testing and physical exam

    0 
    (0%)
     – 5 
    (5%)

    Poorly written physical examination. May be missing 3 or more key exam findings that are critical to patient’s diagnosis. Includes 3 or more inappropriate exams or tests.

    6 
    (6%)
     – 10 
    (10%)

    Well written physical examination but may be missing 1-2 key exam findings critical to patient’s diagnosis. May include 1-2 unnecessary exams or tests.

    11 
    (11%)
     – 15 
    (15%)

    Clearly written physical examination covering all critical components of a focus exam. Tests that are ordered are appropriate for patient and cost effective.

    Assessment

    0 
    (0%)
     – 10 
    (10%)

    Differential diagnosis list too brief and inconclusive. May be missing 3 or more critical components. Priority list may be out of order. Primary diagnosis may be wrong.

    11 
    (11%)
     – 19 
    (19%)

    Well written differential diagnoses. May be missing 1-2 critical components. Correct primary diagnosis identified.

    20 
    (20%)
     – 25 
    (25%)

    Clearly written differential diagnoses. Primary diagnosis identified.

    Plan for patient

    0 
    (0%)
     – 15 
    (15%)

    Poorly written plan. May be missing 3 or more key issues that are critical to patient’s diagnosis.

    16 
    (16%)
     – 25 
    (25%)

    Well written plan but may be missing 1-2 key issues critical to patient’s diagnosis.

    26 
    (26%)
     – 30 
    (30%)

    Clearly written plan covering all critical components for patient’s final diagnosis.

    Clinical Questions

    0 
    (0%)
     – 10 
    (10%)

    Correctly answered 0-69% of the clinical question

    11 
    (11%)
     – 13 
    (13%)

    Correctly answered 70-89% of the clinical question

    14 
    (14%)
     – 15 
    (15%)

    Correctly answered 90-100% of the clinical questions

    Assessment and Care of Patients With Adrenal and Urogynecologic Conditions Essay Assignment Papers

  • Assignment: Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients – Intestines, Hernias, and Abdominal Wall Lesions

    Assignment: Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients – Intestines, Hernias, and Abdominal Wall Lesions

    Week 8: Assessment and Care of Patients With Conditions of the Intestines, Hernias, and Abdominal Wall Lesions

    After experiencing issues with bowel movements, Terri Gillmore went to the hospital where she was diagnosed with a perforated appendix. Her condition, worsened over time and pain medications did not alleviate her symptoms. Additional diagnostic testing revealed that the actual cause of Terri’s symptoms was Crohn’s disease, which was so severe that providers recommended surgery (University of Maryland Medical Center, 2013). As Terri’s case demonstrates, abdominal conditions can be challenging to diagnose, causing distress and pain for patients. Thus it is essential for you not only to know which diagnostic tests to order and when to order them, but also to be aware of when it is appropriate to consult with specialists and other professionals on your multidisciplinary team.

    This week, as you study the pre- and post-operative care of patients with conditions related to intestines, hernias, and abdominal wall lesions, you examine strategies for assessment, diagnosis, and treatment.

    ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW

    Learning Objectives

    By the end of this week, students will:

    Evaluate medical and surgical patients with conditions of the intestines, hernias, and abdominal wall lesions

    Develop differential diagnoses for medical and surgical patients with conditions of the intestines, hernias, and abdominal wall lesions

    Develop treatment plans for medical and surgical patients with conditions of the intestines, hernias, and abdominal wall lesions

     

    Learning Resources

    Required Readings

    Colyar, M. R. (2015).
    Advanced practice nursing procedures
    (1st ed.). Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis Company.

     

    Chapter 110, “Anoscopy”

    Chapter 112, “Flexible Sigmoidoscopy”

    Chapter 121, “Pilonidal Cyst/Abscess I & D”

    Chapter 124, “Thrombosed Hemorrhoid Removal”

    Doherty, G. M. (2015).
    Current diagnosis and treatment: Surgery
    (14th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.

    Chapter 29, “Small Bowel”

    Chapter 30, “Large Intestine”

    Chapter 31, “Anorectum”

    Chapter 32, “Hernias & Other Lesions of the Abdominal Wall”

    Fisher, D., Malpas, P., Dominitz, J., Cash, B., Evans, J., & Decker, G. (2011). Complications of colonoscopy.
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 74
    (4), 745–752. Retrieved from http://www.asge.org/assets/0/71542/71544/56321364-c4d8-4742-8158-55b6bef2a568.pdf

    Neugut, A. I., & Lebwohl, B. (2013). Colonoscopy and colorectal cancer mortality: Both sides of the story.
    Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology, 6
    (3), 189–191. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3625020/

    Required Media

    i-Human Patient Cases. (2014). Retrieved from https://ih2.i-human.com/users/sign_in

    Singh, I. (2013).
    NEJM thoracentesis
    + [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RLNzv170_7Q&list=PLCq48yXbRGqnzYyV2J5aP0kGLU429VMUw

    Assignment: Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients – Intestines, Hernias, and Abdominal Wall Lesions

    Conditions associated with the intestines, hernias, and abdominal wall lesions typically are the result of work environment factors, genetics, or infection. Patients who present with these conditions need extensive diagnostic tests and often require referral to a specialist. For this Assignment, as you examine this week’s i-Human patient case study, consider how you might evaluate and treat pre- and post-operative patients who present with health conditions related to the intestines, hernias, and abdominal wall lesions.

    To prepare:

    Review this week’s Learning Resources. With the intestines, hernias, and abdominal wall lesions in mind, consider how to assess, diagnose, and treat patients in pre- and post-operative care.

    Review this week’s i-Human case study. Based on the patient information provided, think about the health history you would need to collect from the patient.

    Consider what physical exams and diagnostic tests would be appropriate to gather more information about the patient’s condition. Reflect on how the results would be used to make a diagnosis.

    Identify three to five possible conditions to consider in a differential diagnosis for the patient.

    Consider the patient’s diagnosis. Think about clinical guidelines that might support this diagnosis.

    Develop a treatment plan for the patient that includes health promotion and patient education strategies for medical and surgical patients with conditions of the intestines, hernias, and abdominal wall lesions.

    To complete:

    As you interact with this week’s i-Human patient, complete the assigned case study. For guidance on using i-Human, refer to the 
    i-Human Patients Case Player Student Manual
     in the Week 2 Learning Resources.

    Assignment: Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients – Intestines, Hernias, and Abdominal Wall Lesions

    Application_Rubric

    Novice

    Emerging

    Proficient

    HPI Statement

    0 
    (0%)
     – 5 
    (5%)

    Poorly written HPI statement. Incomplete ideas and sentences. Lacks basic history taking skills

    6 
    (6%)
     – 10 
    (10%)

    Well written HPI statement but may be missing 1-2 key components from the history

    11 
    (11%)
     – 15 
    (15%)

    Clearly written HPI statement with comprehensive information gathering from case questions.

    Objective testing and physical exam

    0 
    (0%)
     – 5 
    (5%)

    Poorly written physical examination. May be missing 3 or more key exam findings that are critical to patient’s diagnosis. Includes 3 or more inappropriate exams or tests.

    6 
    (6%)
     – 10 
    (10%)

    Well written physical examination but may be missing 1-2 key exam findings critical to patient’s diagnosis. May include 1-2 unnecessary exams or tests.

    11 
    (11%)
     – 15 
    (15%)

    Clearly written physical examination covering all critical components of a focus exam. Tests that are ordered are appropriate for patient and cost effective.

    Assessment

    0 
    (0%)
     – 10 
    (10%)

    Differential diagnosis list too brief and inconclusive. May be missing 3 or more critical components. Priority list may be out of order. Primary diagnosis may be wrong.

    11 
    (11%)
     – 19 
    (19%)

    Well written differential diagnoses. May be missing 1-2 critical components. Correct primary diagnosis identified.

    20 
    (20%)
     – 25 
    (25%)

    Clearly written differential diagnoses. Primary diagnosis identified.

    Plan for patient

    0 
    (0%)
     – 15 
    (15%)

    Poorly written plan. May be missing 3 or more key issues that are critical to patient’s diagnosis.

    16 
    (16%)
     – 25 
    (25%)

    Well written plan but may be missing 1-2 key issues critical to patient’s diagnosis.

    26 
    (26%)
     – 30 
    (30%)

    Clearly written plan covering all critical components for patient’s final diagnosis.

    Clinical Questions

    0 
    (0%)
     – 10 
    (10%)

    Correctly answered 0-69% of the clinical question

    11 
    (11%)
     – 13 
    (13%)

    Correctly answered 70-89% of the clinical question

    14 
    (14%)
     – 15 
    (15%)

    Correctly answered 90-100% of the clinical questions

    Assignment: Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients – Intestines, Hernias, and Abdominal Wall Lesions

  • Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients – Liver/Biliary Tract, Pancreas, and Spleen Essay Assignment Papers

    Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients – Liver/Biliary Tract, Pancreas, and Spleen Essay Assignment Papers

    Week 7: Assessment and Care of Patients With Conditions of the Liver/Biliary Tract, Pancreas, and Spleen

    Conditions related to the liver/biliary tract, pancreas, and spleen frequently are chronic in nature and difficult to diagnose. Although many of these conditions are manageable once diagnosed, they often have a tremendous impact on quality of life for patients. With chronic conditions such as these accounting for 81% of hospital admissions (Partnership to Fight Chronic Disease, n.d.), it is essential that you have a strong foundation in the various presentations and symptoms.

    ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW

    This week, as you examine the pre- and post-operative care of patients with conditions related to the liver/biliary tract, pancreas, and spleen, you explore strategies for assessment, diagnosis, and treatment.

    Learning Objectives

    By the end of this week, students will:

    Evaluate medical and surgical patients with conditions of the liver/biliary track, pancreas, and spleen

    Develop differential diagnoses for medical and surgical patients with conditions of the liver/biliary track, pancreas, and spleen. Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients – Liver/Biliary Tract, Pancreas, and Spleen Essay Assignment Papers

    Develop treatment plans for medical and surgical patients with conditions of the liver/biliary track, pancreas, and spleen

    Photo Credit: ericsphotography/E+/Getty Images

     Learning Resources

    Required Readings

    Doherty, G. M. (2015).
    Current diagnosis and treatment: Surgery
    (14th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.

    Chapter 24, “Liver & Portal Venous System”

    Chapter 25, “Biliary Tract”

    Chapter 26, “Pancreas”

    Chapter 27, “Spleen”

    Weber, E. C., Vilensky, J. A., & Fog, A. M. (2013).
    Practical radiology: A symptom-based approach.
    Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis Company. Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients – Liver/Biliary Tract, Pancreas, and Spleen Essay Assignment Papers

    Chapter 8, “Abdomen” (Review)

    Gay, S. B., Shaffer, H. A., Vu, Q. D. M., Harker, C. O., Kuzminski, C. D., Christensen, J. D., … Kori, G. A. (2013).
    Introduction to gastrointestinal radiology.
    Retrieved from https://www.med-ed.virginia.edu/courses/rad/gi/

    Required Media

    Geertsma, T. S. A. (n.d.).
    Abdomen and retroperitoneum.
    Retrieved from http://www.ultrasoundcases.info/Case-List.aspx?cat=158

    i-Human Patient Cases. (2014). Retrieved from https://ih2.i-human.com/users/sign_in

    Assignment: Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients – Liver/Biliary Tract, Pancreas, and Spleen

    The liver/biliary tract, pancreas, and spleen often are associated with chronic conditions, which may result in long-term symptoms for patients. Whereas some of these symptoms may be connected easily to a particular condition, many symptoms are associated with multiple conditions, making an immediate diagnosis challenging. For this Assignment, as you examine this week’s i-Human patient case study, consider how you might evaluate and treat pre- and post-operative patients who present with health conditions related to the liver/biliary tract, pancreas, and spleen. Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients – Liver/Biliary Tract, Pancreas, and Spleen Essay Assignment Papers

    To prepare:

    Review this week’s Learning Resources. With the liver/biliary track, pancreas, and spleen in mind, consider how to assess, diagnose, and treat patients in pre- and post-operative care.

    Review this week’s i-Human case study. Based on the patient information provided, think about the health history you would need to collect from the patient. Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients – Liver/Biliary Tract, Pancreas, and Spleen Essay Assignment Papers

    Consider what physical exams and diagnostic tests would be appropriate to gather more information about the patient’s condition. Reflect on how the results would be used to make a diagnosis.

    Identify three to five possible conditions to consider in a differential diagnosis for the patient.

    Consider the patient’s diagnosis. Think about clinical guidelines that might support this diagnosis. Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients – Liver/Biliary Tract, Pancreas, and Spleen Essay Assignment Papers

    Develop a treatment plan for the patient that includes health promotion and patient education strategies for medical and surgical patients with conditions of the liver/biliary tract, pancreas, and spleen.

    To complete:

    As you interact with this week’s i-Human patient, complete the assigned case study. For guidance on using i-Human, refer to the 
    i-Human Patients Case Player Student Manual
     in the Week 2 Learning Resources.

    By Day 7

    This Assignment is due.

    Grading Information

    Week 7 i-Human Rubric

    Practicum Reminder: Week 7 Time Log

    Time Logs

    You are required to keep a log of the time you spend related to your practicum experience 
    and enter every patient you see each day.
     You can access your time log from the Welcome Page in your Meditrek account. You will track time individually for each patient you work with. Please make sure to continuously input your hours throughout the term.

    Week in Review

    This week
     you evaluated medical and surgical patients with conditions related to the liver/biliary tract, pancreas, and spleen and developed differential diagnoses and treatment plans for these conditions. Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients – Liver/Biliary Tract, Pancreas, and Spleen Essay Assignment Papers

    Next week
     you will study the pre-and post-operative care of patients with conditions of the intestines, hernias, and abdominal wall lesions and explore strategies for assessment, diagnosis, and treatment.

    Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients – Liver/Biliary Tract, Pancreas, and Spleen Essay Assignment Papers. Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients – Liver/Biliary Tract, Pancreas, and Spleen Essay Assignment Papers

    Application_Rubric

     

    Novice

    Emerging

    Proficient

    HPI Statement

    0 
    (0%)
     – 5 
    (5%)

    Poorly written HPI statement. Incomplete ideas and sentences. Lacks basic history taking skills

    6 
    (6%)
     – 10 
    (10%)

    Well written HPI statement but may be missing 1-2 key components from the history

    11 
    (11%)
     – 15 
    (15%)

    Clearly written HPI statement with comprehensive information gathering from case questions.

    Objective testing and physical exam

    0 
    (0%)
     – 5 
    (5%)

    Poorly written physical examination. May be missing 3 or more key exam findings that are critical to patient’s diagnosis. Includes 3 or more inappropriate exams or tests.

    6 
    (6%)
     – 10 
    (10%)

    Well written physical examination but may be missing 1-2 key exam findings critical to patient’s diagnosis. May include 1-2 unnecessary exams or tests.

    11 
    (11%)
     – 15 
    (15%)

    Clearly written physical examination covering all critical components of a focus exam. Tests that are ordered are appropriate for patient and cost effective.

    Assessment

    0 
    (0%)
     – 10 
    (10%)

    Differential diagnosis list too brief and inconclusive. May be missing 3 or more critical components. Priority list may be out of order. Primary diagnosis may be wrong.

    11 
    (11%)
     – 19 
    (19%)

    Well written differential diagnoses. May be missing 1-2 critical components. Correct primary diagnosis identified.

    20 
    (20%)
     – 25 
    (25%)

    Clearly written differential diagnoses. Primary diagnosis identified.

    Plan for patient

    0 
    (0%)
     – 15 
    (15%)

    Poorly written plan. May be missing 3 or more key issues that are critical to patient’s diagnosis.

    16 
    (16%)
     – 25 
    (25%)

    Well written plan but may be missing 1-2 key issues critical to patient’s diagnosis.

    26 
    (26%)
     – 30 
    (30%)

    Clearly written plan covering all critical components for patient’s final diagnosis.

    Clinical Questions

    0 
    (0%)
     – 10 
    (10%)

    Correctly answered 0-69% of the clinical question

    11 
    (11%)
     – 13 
    (13%)

    Correctly answered 70-89% of the clinical question

    14 
    (14%)
     – 15 
    (15%)

    Correctly answered 90-100% of the clinical queries

    Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients – Liver/Biliary Tract, Pancreas, and Spleen Essay Assignment Papers

  • Initial Steps for an Evidence-Based Project Template Capstone Project Assignment

    Initial Steps for an Evidence-Based Project Template Capstone Project Assignment

    The purpose of the Initial Steps for an Evidence-Based Project Template assignment is for students to apply the concepts they have learned in this course and develop the framework for the initial steps to the student’s capstone project. The assignment allows the student to initiate the steps for planning, researching and developing an evidence-based project. The template assignment includes the initial steps in planning for an evidence-based practice intervention project.  Directions:  The student will use the Template and complete the required items   1.Introduction (25 to 50 words) – Provide an introduction to your topic or project. The introduction gives the reader an accurate, concrete understanding what the project will cover and what can be gained from implementation of this project. 2.Overview of the Problem (50 to 70 words) – Provide a synopsis of the problem and some indication of why the problem is worth exploring or what contribution the proposed project is apt to make to practice. 3.Project Purpose Statement (20 to 40 words) – Provide a declarative sentence or two which summarize the specific topic and goals of the project. 4.Background and Significance (50 to 100 words) – State the importance of the problem and emphasize what is innovative about your proposed project. Discuss the potential impact of your project on your anticipated results to the betterment of health and/or health outcomes. 5.PICOt formatted Clinical Project Questions (No word limit) – Provide the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Expected Outcomes and timeframe for the proposed project. 6.Literature Review (200 to 400 words) – Provide the key terms used to guide the search for the evidence and provide at least five (5) summaries of research studies to support the evidence. 7.Critical Appraisal of Literature (200 to 400 words) – Provide information on the strength of the evidence, weaknesses of the evidence, what is known from the evidence, and what are the gaps in the evidence. 8.Develop an EBP Standard (150 to 250 words) – List a bundle of care of two (2) to three (3) intervention from the evidence and discuss how individual patient’s preferences will be considered. 9.Implications (150 to 250 words) – Provide a summary of the consequences from the proposed project on research, education and practice. 10.References – Provide references used in the template using APA 6th ed. Manual. Initial Steps for an Evidence-Based Project Template Capstone Project Assignment

    ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW

    Initial Steps for an Evidence-Based Project Template

    (Week 8)

    CLICK HERE FOR A TUTORIAL ON HOW TO EDIT THIS DOCUMENT

     D2L_USU_CON_MSN563_InitialStepsforanEvidence-BasedProjectTemplate

     

    Project Title:

     

     

    Student Name:

     

     

    Introduction:
    (25 to 50 words)

     

     

     

    Overview of the Problem:
    (50 to 70 words)

     

     

     

     

    Project Purpose Statement:
    (20 to 40 words)

     

     

     

     

    Background and Significance:
    (50 to 100 words)

     

     

     

     

     

    PICOt Formatted Clinical Project Question:

     

    P
    opulation –

     

    I
    ntervention –

     

    C
    omparison –

     

    O
    utcome –

     

    t
    imeframe –

     

     

    Literature Review:
    (200 to 400 words)

    Include
    –

    Key terms used to guide the search for evidence

    Five (5) research studies to support the evidence

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Critical Appraisal of Literature:
    (200 to 400 words)

    Include
    –

    Strength of the Evidence

    Weaknesses of the Evidence

    What do we know?

    What are the gaps?

     

     

     

     

     

    Develop an EBP Standard:
    (150 to 250 words)

    Include
    –

    Identify a bundle of care of two (2) to three (3)– Practice guidelines, Assessments, Actions and Treatments

    How will the individual patient’s preferences be considered?

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Implications:
    (150 to 250 words)

    Research

     

     

     

     

     

    Education

     

     

     

     

     

    Practice

     

     

     

     

     

    References:
    (APA 6
    th
    . ed. Format)

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     I
    nitial Steps for an Evidence-Based Project Template Capstone Project Assignment

  • How infectious diseases are covered in the news media essay assignment paper

    How infectious diseases are covered in the news media essay assignment paper

    Find an example of how infectious diseases, or an infectious disease are/is covered in the 
    news media 
    (e.g. CNN, NBC, NY Times, The Oregonian, etc.)
    not health based websites (NOT- WebMD, CDC, Mayo Clinic, etc.).  How infectious diseases are covered in the news media essay assignment paper.

    ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW

    Examine the example and answer these questions in paragraph form summarizing the article:

    Does it tell you how to prevent getting the disease?

    Does it tell you who is at risk?

    Does it tell you how many people are at risk?

    What is the incidence or prevalence provided? Which is it? Incidence or prevalence that they are reporting?

    How does it make you feel? Scared? Empowered?

    What information do you feel like the article was lacking or that you wish it would have told you?

    How is this a public health issue?

    What are some public health solutions (either that you can think of, or that they provide in the article) to prevent/stop the spread of the disease? How infectious diseases are covered in the news media essay assignment paper.

    Verify the information. Do this either by looking up the related information through peer reviewed articles or check the statistics at the CDC, WHO or related sites.  Is whatever it is talking about legitimate/accurate information or is it hype?

    Please also provide a link to the source. 
    How infectious diseases are covered in the news media essay assignment paper

  • Case Study on Death and Dying

    Case Study on Death and Dying

    The practice of health care providers at all levels brings you into contact with people from a variety of faiths. This calls for knowledge and acceptance of a diversity of faith expressions.

    The purpose of this paper is to complete a comparative ethical analysis of George’s situation and decision from the perspective of two worldviews or religions: Christianity and a second religion of your choosing. For the second faith, choose a faith that is unfamiliar to you. Examples of faiths to choose from include Sikh, Baha’i, Buddhism, Shintoism, etc.

    In your comparative analysis, address all of the worldview questions in detail for Christianity and your selected faith. Refer to Chapter 2 of 
    Called to Care
     for the list of questions. Once you have outlined the worldview of each religion, begin your ethical analysis from each perspective. Case Study on Death and Dying.

    ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW

    In a minimum of 1,500-2,000 words, provide an ethical analysis based upon the different belief systems, reinforcing major themes with insights gained from your research, and answering the following questions based on the research:

    How would each religion interpret the nature of George’s malady and suffering? Is there a “why” to his disease and suffering? (i.e., is there a reason for why George is ill, beyond the reality of physical malady?)

    In George’s analysis of his own life, how would each religion think about the value of his life as a person, and value of his life with ALS?

    What sorts of values and considerations would each religion focus on in deliberating about whether or not George should opt for euthanasia?

    Given the above, what options would be morally justified under each religion for George and why?

    Finally, present and defend your own view. Case Study on Death and Dying.

    Support your position by referencing at least three academic resources (preferably from the GCU Library) in addition to the course readings, lectures, the Bible, and the textbooks for each religion. Each religion must have a primary source included. A total of six references are required according to the specifications listed above. Incorporate the research into your writing in an appropriate, scholarly manner.

    Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is required.

    This Case Study on Death and Dying assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

    You are required to submit this Case Study on Death and Dying assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

    Case Study on Death and Dying

    Top of Form

    Case Study on Death and Dying 

     

    1

    Unsatisfactory

    0.00%

    2

    Less Than Satisfactory

    65.00%

    3

    Satisfactory

    75.00%

    4

    Good

    85.00%

    5

    Excellent

    100.00%

    70.0 %Content

     

    20.0 %Identification of Ethical Issues as They Relate to the Four Principles of Principlism

    The ethical issues are incorrectly organized. Case Study on Death and Dying

    Ethical issues are adequately organized according to the four principles of principlism. Some of the categorization is suspect.

    Ethical issues are organized according to the four principles of principlism.

    Ethical issues are organized according to the four principles of principlism. A distinction between the four principles is clearly stated, but the reasoning of the categorization is merely adequate.

    Ethical issues are organized according to the four principles of principlism. A distinction between the four principles and the reasoning of the categorization is clearly stated.

    20.0 %Description of the Christian Worldview and the Other Worldview

    The description of the Christian worldview and the selected worldview address little to none of the seven worldview questions and the description is mostly incorrect or irrelevant.

    The description of the Christian worldview and the selected worldview address most of the seven worldview questions with little evidence of a surface-level understanding.

    The description of the Christian worldview and the selected worldview adequately address all seven worldview questions, but the description has a surface-level understanding.

    The description of the Christian worldview and the selected worldview address all seven worldview questions with evidence of basic understanding utilizing a detailed description.

    The description of the Christian worldview and the selected worldview address all seven worldview questions with evidence of a deep understanding utilizing a detailed description.

    20.0 %Analysis of Ethical Issues through Christian Worldview and the Other Worldview

    The primary principles and values in the decision making process of each worldview have little to no relevance. Ethical reasoning seems to have no connection from the worldview considerations.

    The primary principles and values are acknowledged in the decision making process of each worldview. Ethical reasoning is loosely based from the worldview considerations.

    The primary principles and values surface in the decision making process of each worldview. Ethical reasoning is implied from the worldview considerations.

    The primary principles and values are recognized in the decision making process of each worldview. Ethical reasoning is explained from the worldview considerations. Most implications of the principles and values are given consideration.

    The primary principles and values are clearly distinguished in the decision making process of each worldview. Ethical reasoning is clearly delineated from the worldview considerations. The implications of the principles and values are given complete consideration.

    10.0 %Personal Recommendation

    The personal recommendation from the student’s worldview is stated, but the justification has little to no relevance.

    The personal recommendation from the student’s worldview is stated with proper justification. Case Study on Death and Dying

    The personal recommendation from the student’s worldview is stated with proper justification with some implications explained.

    The personal recommendation from the student’s worldview is stated with proper justification. The primary principles of the student’s worldview are clearly described with most implications explained.

    The personal recommendation from the student’s worldview is stated with proper justification. The primary principles of the student’s worldview are clearly described with all implications explained.

    20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

     

    7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose

    Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

    Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.

    Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.

    Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. They are descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

    Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

    8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction

    Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

    Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

    Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

    Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

    Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

    5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

    Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.

    Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

    Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

    Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

    Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. Case Study on Death and Dying

    10.0 %Format

     

    5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

    Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

    Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.

    Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

    Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

    All format elements are correct.

    5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

    Sources are not documented.

    Documentation of sources is inconsistent and/or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

    Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

    Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

    Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

    100 %Total Weightage

     

    Case Study on Death and Dying

     

    Case Study on Death and Dying

  • ASD(Atrial septal defects) and VSD (Ventricular septal defects)

    ASD(Atrial septal defects) and VSD (Ventricular septal defects)

    1)  You will be providing care for patients of different cultures. Choose a diet that would be cultural specific for a patient with new onset of hypertension. Identify the culture of the patient and discuss how you would explain this diet to your patient. For example, how would you adapt the D-A-S-H (dietary approaches to stop hypertension) diet for a Hispanic patient?

    2)   Briefly discuss the symptoms of right- and left-sided HF. What common primary care diagnoses result in the development of HF symptoms? Discuss the treatment of one of these common causes. What are some serious signs and symptoms of acute HF and the findings you may encounter during auscultation? When would you refer to cardiology for evaluation and treatment? Also discuss the criteria used to make a diagnosis of HF and interpretation of any diagnostic results that would be obtained. Consider your practicum experiences and discuss them as they relate to the topic.

    3) Discuss the definitions of ASD(Atrial septal defects) and VSD (Ventricular septal defects). What are the symptoms and the assessment findings you may encounter among children? What are the symptoms and physical examing findings from ascultation for each in adults? Briefly discuss treatment options for children and adults with ASD and VSD. ASD(Atrial septal defects) and VSD (Ventricular septal defects)

  • evidence-based intervention project

    Evidence-Based Practice – Using supporting documentation from at least one (1) nursing publication, describe how evidence-based practice is different from research. How would you identify a research project as being an evidence-based intervention project versus the creation of knowledge in a nursing research project?