Author: admin

NRP 513 Guide to an Overall Critique of a Qualitative Research Report

Complete
 the 
NRP 513 Guide to an Overall Critique of a Qualitative Research Report
worksheet for the qualitative article you selected.

Qualitative article is being Attached, and the 
NRP 513 Guide to an Overall Critique of a Qualitative Research Report
is attached too.

Attention: What i need is to answer all the questions from the guide utilizing the article attached. Please read carefully the article. P;ease Dot Not invent. answers have to come from article. Professor will read article and compared with the answers in the guide. All questions needed to be answered. please do not miss questions. Yes or not plain answers not allowed. Needs to be explained why yes or why not. NRP 513 Guide to an Overall Critique of a Qualitative Research Report

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW

Another instruction:  1 st page start with a cover page, then answer all questions with not exemption and last page needs to have the references. NRP 513 Guide to an Overall Critique of a Qualitative Research Report.

University of Phoenix Material

 

Guide to an Overall Critique of a Qualitative Research Report

 

Aspect of the Report

Critiquing Questions

Title

Ø Is the title a good one, suggesting the key phenomenon and the group or community under study?

 

Abstract

Ø Does the abstract clearly and concisely summarize the main features of the report?

 

Introduction

Statement of the problem

 

Ø Was the problem stated unambiguously and is it easy to identify?

 

Ø Did the problem statement build a cogent and persuasive argument for the new study?

 

Ø Was the problem significant for nursing?

 

Ø Was there a good match between the research problem on the one hand and the paradigm, tradition, and methods on the other—that is, was a qualitative approach appropriate?

 

 

Research questions

Ø Were research questions explicitly stated? If not, was their absence justified?

 

Ø Were the questions consistent with the study’s philosophical basis, underlying tradition, conceptual framework, or ideologic orientation?

NRP 513 Guide to an Overall Critique of a Qualitative Research Report

 

Literature review

Ø Did the report adequately summarize the existing body of knowledge related to the problem or phenomenon of interest?

 

Ø Did the literature review provide a strong basis for the new study?

 

NRP 513 Guide to an Overall Critique of a Qualitative Research Report

Conceptual underpinnings

Ø Were key concepts adequately defined conceptually?

 

Ø Was the philosophical basis, underlying tradition, conceptual framework, or ideologic orientation made explicit and was it appropriate for the problem?

 

 

 

 

Method

Protection of participants’ rights

 

Ø Were appropriate procedures used to safeguard the rights of study participants?

 

Ø Was the study subject to external review by an IRB or ethics review board?

 

Ø Was the study designed to minimize risks and maximize benefits to participants?

 

Research design and research tradition

 

Ø Was the identified research tradition (if any) congruent with the methods used to collect and analyze data?

 

Ø Was an adequate amount of time spent with study participants?

 

Ø Did the design unfold during data collection, giving researchers opportunities to capitalize on early understandings?

 

Ø Was there an adequate number of contacts with study participants?

NRP 513 Guide to an Overall Critique of a Qualitative Research Report

Sample and setting

Ø Was the group or population of interest adequately described? Were the setting and sample described in sufficient detail?

 

Ø Was the approach used to recruit participants or gain access to the site productive and appropriate?

 

Ø Was the best possible method of sampling used to enhance information richness and address the needs of the study?

 

Ø Was the sample size adequate? Was saturation achieved?

NRP 513 Guide to an Overall Critique of a Qualitative Research Report

Data collection

Ø Were the methods of gathering data appropriate? Were data gathered through two or more methods to achieve triangulation?

 

Ø Did the researcher ask the right questions or make the right observations, and were they recorded in an appropriate fashion?

 

Ø Was a sufficient amount of data gathered? Were the data of sufficient depth and richness?

 

Procedures

Ø Were data collection and recording procedures adequately described and do they appear appropriate?

 

Ø Were data collected in a manner that minimized bias or behavioral distortions? Were the staff who collected data appropriately trained?

NRP 513 Guide to an Overall Critique of a Qualitative Research Report

Enhancement of trustworthiness

Ø Did the researchers use effective strategies to enhance the trustworthiness/integrity of the study, and was there a good description of those strategies?

 

Ø Were the methods used to enhance trustworthiness adequate?

 

Ø Did the researcher document research procedures and decision processes sufficiently that findings are auditable and confirmable?

 

Ø Was there evidence of researcher reflexivity?

 

Ø Was there “thick description” of the context, participants, and findings, and was it at a sufficient level to support transferability?

NRP 513 Guide to an Overall Critique of a Qualitative Research Report

Results

Data analysis

 

Ø Were the data management and data analysis methods adequately described?

 

Ø Was the data analysis strategy compatible with the research tradition and with the nature and type of data gathered?

 

Ø Did the analysis yield an appropriate “product” (e.g., a theory, taxonomy, thematic pattern)?

 

Ø Did the analytic procedures suggest the possibility of biases?

NRP 513 Guide to an Overall Critique of a Qualitative Research Report

Findings

Ø Were the findings effectively summarized, with good use of excerpts and supporting arguments?

 

Ø Did the themes adequately capture the meaning of the data? Does it appear that the researcher satisfactorily conceptualized the themes or patterns in the data?

 

Ø Did the analysis yield an insightful, provocative, authentic, and meaningful picture of the phenomenon under investigation?

 

 

Theoretical integration

Ø Were the themes or patterns logically connected to each other to form a convincing and integrated whole?

 

Ø Were figures, maps, or models used effectively to summarize conceptualizations?

 

Ø If a conceptual framework or ideologic orientation guided the study, were the themes or patterns linked to it in a cogent manner?

 

NRP 513 Guide to an Overall Critique of a Qualitative Research Report

Discussion

Interpretation of the findings

 

Ø Were the findings interpreted within an appropriate social or cultural context?

 

Ø Were major findings interpreted and discussed within the context of prior studies?

 

Ø Were the interpretations consistent with the study’s limitations?

 

Implications/recommendations

Ø Did the researchers discuss the implications of the study for clinical practice or further research—and are those implications reasonable and complete?

 

 

General Issues

Presentation

 

Ø Was the report well-written, well-organized, and sufficiently detailed for critical analysis?

 

Ø Was the description of the methods, findings, and interpretations sufficiently rich and vivid?

 

Researcher credibility

Ø Do the researchers’ clinical, substantive, or methodologic qualifications and experience enhance confidence in the findings and their interpretation?

 

 

Summary assessment

1.       Did the report discuss efforts to enhance or evaluate the quality of the data and the overall inquiry?  If so, is the description sufficiently detailed and clear?  If not, was there other information that allows you to draw inferences about the quality of the data, the analysis and interpretation?

2.      Which specific techniques (if any) did the researcher use to enhance the quality of the inquiry? Were these strategies used judiciously and to good effect?

3.      What quality-enhancement strategies were not used?  Would supplementary strategies have strengthened your confidence in the study and its evidence?

4.      Given the efforts to enhance data quality, what can you conclude about the study’s integrity, rigor, or trustworthiness?

 

Ø Do the study findings appear to be trustworthy—do you have confidence in the
truth
value of the results?

 

Ø Does the study contribute any meaningful evidence that can be used in nursing practice or that is useful to the nursing discipline?

 

NRP 513 Guide to an Overall Critique of a Qualitative Research Report

 

Note: The Guide to an Overall Critique of a Qualitative Research Report worksheet is adopted from Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (pp. 101 & 501), by D. F. Polit, and C. T. Beck, 2017, Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer. Copyright 2017 by Wolters Kluwer. Adapted with permission. NRP 513 Guide to an Overall Critique of a Qualitative Research Report

A 56-year-old male was brought to the emergency room with a chief complaint was right flank pain.

History of present Illness:

One day prior to admission, the patient developed a change in the color of his urine from pale yellow to red in color. There was no associated fever, painful urination, or penile discharge. He decided to consult with his primary physician the following day.

One hour prior to admission, the patient developed severe right flank pain associated with nausea. Upon admission, the patient was noted by the ER physician to be in severe pain, with a pain scale of 9 from a visual analog pain scale from 1  to 10. On physical exam, patient had the following findings:

Vital Signs BP: 140/90 mm Hg

Heart rate: 110 bpm

Respiration rate: 15 breaths per minute patient

Temperature: 98.6 deg C

All exam findings for the head, neck, heart, lungs, and abdomen were normal.

On examination of the back, patient had tenderness on the right flank upon palpation.

On examination of the genitalia, there was no penile discharge.

Note of a 1 x 1 cm tophus on right big toe.

The following diagnostic exams were ordered

CBC with WBC differential count

Urinalysis

Serum uric acid

KUB x-ray

MRI Scan abdominopelvic area

Past Medical History:

Diagnosed with gout one year prior to admission

On medication with allopurinol

No heart and lung disease

No diabetes or hypertension

Click here to review the results of the diagnostic exam.

Questions and topics for discussion:

After considering his signs, symptoms, findings, and diagnostic exams, what would be the clinical diagnosis in this patient? (1 pt)

What is causing the hematuria to occur?  (1 pt)

Why are his vitals (BP, HR, breathing) elevated? (1 pt)

What is causing the severe right flank pain? (1 pt)

How are the elevated levels of serum uric acid and positive uric acid crystals in the urinalysis related to your diagnosis? (1 pts)

What pain medication would you provide to this patient? Why would you choose this medication? (2 pts)

What treatment would you recommend for removing the cause of his pain?  Explain your answer.  (3 pts)

Ethical and Environmental Responsibility

In a Word document

Review the Debate Issue on page 192. Describe the pros and cons of each stance described. Your answers should total two to three paragraphs for each stance. Each paragraph should contain three to five complex sentences.

Write your answers to the following questions about Case 5, “New Belgium Brewing: Ethical and Environmental Responsibility,” beginning on page 434. Your answers should total one to two paragraphs for each question. Each paragraph should contain three to five complex sentences.

Describe the circumstances that led to New Belgium Brewing Company’s focus on social responsibility.

Explain whether you believe New Belgium Brewing Company’s focus on social responsibility provides a key competitive advantage. Ethical and Environmental Responsibility.

Describe the environmental issues New Belgium Brewing Company manages. Why has the company taken such a strong stance regarding sustainability?

Does New Belgium Brewing Company’s focus on sustainability come at the expense of other social responsibilities? Explain why or why not.

What lessons can be learned from New Belgium Brewing Company?

My book is Business Ethics: Ethical Decision Making and Cases; 10th ed, by O.C. Ferrell, J. Fraedrich, and L. Ferrell, 2015. Ethical and Environmental Responsibility.

Read the Attitude and Perceptions document(Attitudes and Perceptions

It is important to be aware of others’ perceptions in an organization. Sometimes a manager’s attitude can affect an entire department and its functions. Have you ever had to work for a person, such as a teacher, an instructor, a coach, or a supervisor, whose attitude caused everyone to be miserable? If no, you can choose a leader with whom you did not work directly but witnessed taking such an attitude with another subordinate. If you have never experienced this type of person, you may think of a television or a film character.)and answer the following  questions based on your understanding of different perceptions and  obstacles at a workplace:

What, according to you, did that person do to create negative situations?

What was your or the subordinate’s attitude toward the person in that particular situation?

How does a negative management attitude affect trust among the  employees? When a manager is not trustworthy, does this information  spread to other departments?

Suggest at least two ways you would solve the problems if you were the manager. Why would you adopt such measures?

Now, reflect on a situation where you experienced a positive leader  who valued the team, shared his or her visions, and encouraged the team  to develop and answer the following questions on the basis of your  understanding:

How do you describe your feelings and attitude when working for a  leader who is positive and supportive versus a negative manager? How  does a positive supportive leader affect trust among team members?

How influential are perceptions of certain employees either in your team or in other departments?

Development of a mini business plan for a new service or product within your healthcare facility

Develop a mini business plan for a new service or product within your healthcare facility or a healthcare facility you are familiar with (e.g., a hospital, a health clinic, a nursing home, or an outpatient center).

Create a 5-page business plan that:

• Describes the need for the service,

• factors impacting the need for the service,

• fiscal planning issues, and human capital issues and needs.

• Provides an overview of the product or the service.

• Analyze the market, explaining why this product or service is necessary and how much you will get paid for selling the product or providing this service.

• Provides an operational budget.

• Provides a capital budget (major purchases required).

• Provides a human resource cost budget—if you are borrowing staff from other departments, you must account for its costs in the human resource budget.

• Summarizes why this product or service should be given the green light.

Development of a mini business plan for a new service or product within your healthcare facility

Principles and Power in Leadership Essay

Using the famous leader, you chose BILL GATES you will evaluate the leader

Summarize the key details about your chosen leader.

o Who is s/he?

o What is the organization?

o What are one or two important points you have learned so far in your study of the leader?

o This section of your paper should only be 1 or 2 paragraphs.

• Analyze the leader’s alignment to the four universal principles: integrity, responsibility, compassion, and forgiveness, citing examples and research to support your assessment. In essence, how did the leader demonstrate (or not demonstrate) those principles in his or her leadership practice?

• Analyze the different bases of power this leader used, citing examples and research to support your assessment. In essence, how did this leader demonstrate use of power and which bases of power did s/he use to influence others?

• Analyze the demonstrated beliefs of this leader, citing examples and research to support your assessment. In essence, what did the leader appear to believe about: Principles and Power in Leadership Essay.

o people inside the organization,

o people outside the organization,

o power,

o processes and policies,

o profit (or other relevant outcomes). Principles and Power in Leadership Essay.

• Analyze how this leader affected the culture of his or her organization, citing examples and research to support your assessment. In essence,

o How did this leader’s attitudes and actions affect followers?

o Which behaviors had a strong effect on followers?

o Was this leader credible? Based on what evidence?

o How did this leader’s attitudes and actions influence the organization’s ethical practices?

o Was the leader an ethical leader? Based on what evidence? Principles and Power in Leadership Essay

The Reality of Providing Nursing Services in a Healthcare Rationing System Essay

The Reality of Providing Nursing Services in a Healthcare Rationing System

This assignment will help you explore how nursing leaders provide services while at the same time rationing services.

One of the areas that must be considered in the field of fiscal and resource management is the issue of rationing services to patients.

. Based on your research and understanding, create a 3- page paper that answers the following:

• How would you as a nursing leader balance the clinical needs of the patients with the fiscal sustainability of the healthcare facility? The Reality of Providing Nursing Services in a Healthcare Rationing System Essay.

• What are the ethical issues faced by nursing leaders in a healthcare rationing environment?

• What are the internal and external forces impacting your decision making in this environment?

• How can evidence-based care help you make fiscal decisions in this environment?

• How can evidence-based leadership be used in decision making? The Reality of Providing Nursing Services in a Healthcare Rationing System Essay

Benchmark – Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Essay Paper

Prepare this assignment as a 1,500-1,750 word paper using the instructor feedback from the Topic 1, 2, and 3 assignments and the guidelines below.

PICOT Statement

Revise the PICOT statement you wrote in the Topic 1 assignment.

The final PICOT statement will provide a framework for your capstone project (the project students must complete during their final course in the RN-BSN program of study).

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW

Research Critiques

In the Topic 2 and Topic 3 assignments you completed a qualitative and quantitative research critique. Use the feedback you received from your instructor on these assignments to finalize the critical analysis of the study by making appropriate revisions.

The completed analysis should connect to your identified practice problem of interest that is the basis for your PICOT statement.

Refer to “Research Critique Guidelines.” Questions under each heading should be addressed as a narrative in the structure of a formal paper. Benchmark – Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Essay Paper.

Proposed Evidence-Based Practice Change

Discuss the link between the PICOT statement, the research articles, and the nursing practice problem you identified. Include relevant details and supporting explanation and use that information to propose evidence-based practice changes.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. Benchmark – Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Essay Paper

Endocrine System: Selected Pathophysiology & Pharmacologic Therapy Discussion Questions Essay

Discussion Question 1

Share a case study from your clinical practice or from the literature on an endocrine disorder. Discuss the pathophysiology of the disorder, including the effects on the endocrine feedback system, and the role of the hypothalamic-pituitary axis. Identify the pharmacologic agent(s) used to treat the disorder and how the pharmacologic agent(s) alters the pathophysiology?

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW

References

Pharmacology for Nursing Care

Lehne, R. A. (2015). Pharmacology for nursing care (9th ed.). St. Louis: Saunders/Elsevier. ISBN-13: 9780323321907. Endocrine System: Selected Pathophysiology & Pharmacologic Therapy Discussion Questions Essay.

Pathophysiology: The Biologic Basis for Disease in Adults and Children

McCance, K. L., Huether, S. E., Brashers, V.L., and Rote, N. S. (2013). Pathophysiology: The biologic basis for disease in adults and children (7th ed.). St. Louis: Mosby Elsevier. ISBN-13: 9780323088541

Discussion Question 2

Human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) is currently being used as an aid to weight loss in conjunction with an extremely restricted caloric intake of 500 calories per day. Many people are buying the HCG through the Internet with no medical surveillance. Research the HCG diet and share your thoughts on the efficacy, safety, and validity of the diet. What strategies would you use to educate patients on the diet? Endocrine System: Selected Pathophysiology & Pharmacologic Therapy Discussion Questions Essay

Reading research literature

The purpose of this Reading research literature assignment completed as an APA Paper is for the student to learn to examine, analyze, critique, and summarize an original research article.

Course Outcomes

Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to meet the following course outcomes:

CO1: Examine the sources of evidence that contribute to professional nursing practice. (PO7)

CO2: Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies. (POs 4 and 8)

CO4: Evaluate published nursing research for credibility and lab significance related to evidence-based practice. (POs 4 and 8)

CO5: Recognize the role of research findings in evidence-based practice. (POs 7 and 8)

Requirements

Through this assignment, the student will:

Critique the required article found below and in your own words, describe the research question, sample, design of study, data collection method, findings, and limitations of each. (CO 1, CO2,)

Summarize the research article and evaluate the significance to nursing. Do not just quote the author’s words. Paraphrase the information. (CO 4, CO5).

Guidelines to Writing the Paper

This assignment is completed as an APA paper. You are required to complete the paper using Microsoft Office Word 2013 (or later version), or Windows and Office 2011 (or later version) for MAC.

Download the required article for analysis:

Hanson, H., Schroeter, K., Hanson, A., Asmus, K., & Grossman, A. (2013). Preferences for photographic art among hospitalized patients with cancer.
Oncology Nursing Forum
, 40, E337-E345. doi:10.1188/13.ONF.E337-E345

Introduction (one paragraph): The introduction should be interesting and capture the reader’s attention.

Provide a brief description of the research article to be discussed.

Discuss the purpose of your paper. The purpose statement of the paper should relate to the research article reviewed and the implications that it has to evidence based nursing practice.

You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words

Describe the research question for this study in a paragraph.

Describe the research in greater detail.

Include your observations about this question.

Discuss events or trends that could have affected this question.

You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words

Describe the research design of this study, and in your own words discuss the design.

Discuss the research design of the study.

Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the type of design and hypothesize why the author utilized the design as opposed to others.

You will need to summarize the information from the article in your own words

Describe the sample.

Briefly describe the sample size used for this study

Make a judgment as to whether the sample size was adequate and defend your answer.

Describe the number or participants and determine if the number of participants was adequate compared to the research question and the intent of the study.

Are these numbers adequate? Discuss gaps in that you identified.

You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words

Describe the data collection method(s)’

Who collected the data?

What tools were used?

What were the ethical considerations addressed and discuss gaps you identified.

You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words

Describe the limitations of the study.

Identify the limitations within the study

Describe how the limitations could be overcome in subsequent studies

Comment on why limitations are important to list and discuss within a study

You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words

Describe the findings reported in the study.

Describe the findings reported in the study

Discuss whether the findings of the study answered the research question posed within the study

Discuss the credibility of the findings

If the findings do not support the research question posed within the study, what do you believe is the reason?

You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words

Summary

Summarize important points from the body of your paper including the key components of the paper.

Include a statement about the research question and the findings.

Discuss the probability of implementation into practice. Based on these findings, is the evidence that you found on your topic strong enough to suggest a change in practice, or an idea for practice?

End with a concluding statement.

Citations and References

must be included
to support the information within each topic area. Refer to the APA manual, Chapter 7, for examples of proper reference format. In-text citations are to be noted for all information contained in your paper that is not your original idea or thought. Ask yourself, “How do I know this?” and then cite the source.

Reference Page
: The Reference Page should start on a new page (insert a page break). All references should be cited within the body of the paper as (Author, year) and the full reference should be included in APA format on the reference page. A url link alone is not an adequate reference. See the APA Guidelines in Course Resources for examples of properly formatted references. Reading research literature.