Author: admin

  • Health Insurance Coverage Discussion Questions

    Answer the following Health Insurance Coverage Discussion Questions;

    Do you feel it is better to allow individuals the freedom to choose any type of  (or no) health insurance coverage available to them or to increase government involvement in a person’s/family’s healthcare via mandates, such as the ACA and/or the government as a single insurer for all residents.  Why?

    Discuss the mission of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) and the Center for Medicare & Medicaid Innovation (CMMI).

    ORDER A CUSTOM-WRITTEN PAPER NOW

    If you could reform the malpractice or tort laws, what types of changes would you make? When do you feel it is appropriate for someone to claim damages from medical procedures or treatment? Do you feel there should be a cap on the payments, and if so, how would you decide what that cap would be? What are all the different costs involved in medical malpractice suites? Is it easier to talk about tort reform than to actually try to define it? Health Insurance Coverage Discussion Questions.

    4.  The rights of people once they have been incarcerated can be a controversial topic of  discussion. Discuss the healthcare rights of the incarcerated population. What do you feel should or should not be provided to those who are imprisoned? Are there certain tests or procedures that they feel should be performed routinely? Why or why not? What is the nurse’s role, based on the section on page 248?

    This Health Insurance Coverage Discussion Questions assignment must be presented based on the instructions given;  in an APA format word document, Arial 12 font.

    A minimum of 3 evidence-based references no older than 5 years  (excluding the class textbook) are required. You must post at least two replies to any or your peers sustained with the proper references.  A minimum of 600 words are required (excluding first and last page). Health Insurance Coverage Discussion Questions

  • Critical Thinking Questions – Health Insurance Today

    Please answer questions A, B, and C under “Critical thinking” in Chapter 8 of the 
    Health Insurance Today
     Workbook. Enter your answers into a Word document named “FederalPlansWorkbook”.

    A.Explain the difference between “categorically needy” and medically needy” and give example of individuals who fall into each group.

    B.You are a health insurance proffessional employed by Generic Family Practice. On September 7, 20xx, Emily Carson brought her 4-year-old son, Cory, to the office. Cory, who is complaining of ear pain and a sore throat, is new to the practice. Ms. Carson, a single mother, states that she and Cory are on Medicaid. After greeting Ms. Carson, what is the first thing you should do?

    C. Brice Sammuels, a 9-year-old girl, come to Generic Family Practice on a monthly basic for follow-up treatment for a serve case of asthma. Gina Petter, a temp who is filling in for you during an absence, not that Brice was eligible for Medidcaid every month for the past 2 years. Assuming that Brice is eligible for Medicaid benefits on this visit, Gina neglects to verify current eligibility.

    1. What, if any, possible problems could result from Gina’s failure to follow proper procedures?

    2. If Brice’s visits have been covered by Medicaid for the past 2 years, what possible reason might there be for Medicaid to discontinue benefits?

    Please answer Critical thinking questions A and B in Chapter 10 of the 
    Health Insurance Today
     workbook. Put your answers into a Word document named “MilitaryPlansWorkbook” .

    A. Patient Betsy Froman, who is enrolled in TRICARE standard, has been referred to you, the health insurance professional at Broamoor Clinic, with this question: ” I am scheduled for an outpatient echocardiogram at Broadmoor Meidcal Center next week. What, if anything, need to be done before I have this procedure?” What should you tell Ms. Froman? Will she need an NAS?

    B. Assume  that the Broadmoor providers are nonPars for military claims and require patients to file their own claims. Patient Arnold Chessworth, a CHAMPVA-eligible patient, asks you for help in getting filing information. Generate an instruction sheet for military patients on where to find this information: include online sources and toll-free telephone number.

  • Introduction & Needs Assessment

    Introduction & Needs Assessment

    Draft Introduction & Needs Assessment Section with references (CLO 4; PLO 4)

     

    Working with your group, write up and submit an introduction and needs assessment, including APA 6th edition in-text citations and references. Include page numbers in your draft. Please follow the Signature Assignment Paper Guidelines & Exemplar for complete format and content. Please see rubric for more information on grading.

    This is my plan ,
    TOBACCO PREVENTION AND CONTROL PROGRAM, Goal,
    Reduce the incidence of lung cancer in adult residence of San Diego.Improve health of the adult users in San Diego by reducing the tobacco use.

    For PRIMARY DATA leave it blank I will do this part.

    follow the structure please,

    Signature Assignment Paper Guidelines.docx
     – Word Document 
    (81.6 KB)

    SIG ASSIG INTRO & NEEDS ASS- EXEMPLAR.docx
     – Word Document 
    (28.5 KB)

    COH 380 SIG ASSIG- DRAFT INTRO AND NEEDS ASSESS RUBRIC -2.docx
     – Word Document 
    (83.5 KB)

    Submit MS Word or PDF file.

    Content Summary

    Health problem

    Target population (e.g., Who is the health problem affecting? Where do they live?)

    Needs assessment – Use the rubric PLO #4 & CLO #4 sections (e.g., Phases 1-3 of PRECEDE – PROCEED)

    Data collection

    Data analysis

    Risk factors

    Resources

    Use your required textbook (e.g., Ch 4) and weblinks at the end of each chapter

    Use national, state, and local data resources

    Schedule a Consultation with a Librarian to Find Academic and Scholarly Publications

    Use National University’s Library System to search for relevant peer-reviewed journal articles

    Use APA resources to avoid plagiarism, go to: http://nu.libguides.com/students

    Schedule an appointment with the Writing Center to review APA in-text citations and references

    COH 380 SIG ASSIG INTRO & NEEDS ASSESS RUBRIC.docx
     – Word Document 
    (80.5 KB) 
    Introduction & Needs Assessment

  • Approach to Care of Cancer Essay Assignment Paper

    Approach to Care of Cancer Essay Assignment Paper

    Details:

    Write a Approach to care of cancer essay assignment paper (1,250-1,750 words) describing the approach to care of cancer. In addition, include the following in your paper:

    Describe the diagnosis and staging of cancer.

    Describe at least three complications of cancer, the side effects of treatment, and methods to lessen physical and psychological effects.

    Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

    ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW

    This Approach to care of cancer essay assignment paper uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the

    rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment. approach to care of cancer essay assignment paper.

    Approach to care of cancer essay assignment paper rubric

     

    1

    Unsatisfactory 0-72%

    0.00%

    2

    Less Than Satisfactory 72-75%

    75.00%

    3

    Satisfactory 76-79%

    79.00%

    4

    Good 80-89%

    89.00%

    5

    Excellent 90-100%

    100.00%

    80.0 %Content

     

    30.0 %Explanation of the Diagnosis and Staging of Cancers is Provided.

    An explanation of the diagnosis and staging of cancers is not provided.

    An explanation of the diagnosis and staging of cancers is provided but is missing relevant information.

    An explanation of the diagnosis and staging of cancers is provided that meets the assignment criteria.

    An explanation of the diagnosis and staging of cancers is provided that is offered in a detailed manner.

    An explanation of the diagnosis and staging of cancers is provided that is offered in a detailed manner, while demonstrating higher level or critical thinking.

    20.0 %At Least Three Complications of Cancer are Identified With Comprehensive Discussion of Available Treatments.

    Less than three complications of cancer are identified. Approach to care of cancer essay assignment paper

    At least three complications of cancer are identified but lacking a comprehensive discussion of available treatments.

    At least three complications of cancer are identified with a comprehensive discussion of available treatments.

    More than three complications of cancer are identified with a comprehensive discussion of available treatments.

    More than three complications of cancer are identified with a comprehensive discussion of available treatments, while demonstrating higher level or critical thinking.

    30.0 %Provides Recommendations to Address Physiological and Psychological Side Effects of Care.

    Recommendations to address physiological and psychological side effects of care are lacking. Approach to care of cancer essay assignment paper

    Recommendations to address physiological and psychological side effects of care are missing relevant information.

    Recommendations to address physiological and psychological side effects of care meet the assignment criteria.

    Recommendations to address physiological and psychological side effects of care are offered in a detailed manner.

    Recommendations to address physiological and psychological side effects of care are offered in a detailed manner, while demonstrating higher level or critical thinking.

    15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

     Approach to care of cancer essay assignment paper

    5.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose

    Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Approach to care of cancer essay assignment paper

    Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.

    Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Approach to care of cancer essay assignment paper

    Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

    Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

    5.0 %Paragraph Development and Transitions

    Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed.

    Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident.

    Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.

    A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose.

    There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless.

    5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

    Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.

    Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.

    Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.

    Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.

    Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. Approach to care of cancer essay assignment paper

    5.0 %Format

     

    2.0 %Paper Format (1- inch margins; 12-point-font; double-spaced; Times New Roman, Arial, or Courier)

    Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

    Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.

    Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

    Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

    All format elements are correct.

    3.0 %Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment)

    No reference page is included. No citations are used.

    Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. Approach to care of cancer essay assignment paper

    Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present.

    Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and GCU style is usually correct.

    In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.

    100 %Total Weightage

    Approach to care of cancer essay assignment paper

  • NRS-427 Functional Health Patterns Community Assessment Essay Assignment Papers

    NRS-427 Functional Health Patterns Community Assessment Essay Assignment Papers

    Details:

    This is a Collaborative Learning Community assignment.

    The instructor will assign you to a CLC group.

    The RN to BSN program at Grand Canyon University meets the requirements for clinical competencies as defined by the Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education (CCNE) and the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN), using nontraditional experiences for practicing nurses. These experiences come in the form of direct and indirect care experiences in which licensed nursing students engage in learning within the context of their hospital organization, specific care discipline, and local communities. NRS-427 Functional Health Patterns Community Assessment Essay Assignment Papers.

    ORDER A CUSTOM-WRITTEN PAPER NOW

    This NRS-427 Functional Health Patterns Community Assessment Essay Assignment Papers consists of both an interview and a PowerPoint (PPT) presentation.

    Assessment/Interview

    Select a community of interest. It is important that the community selected be one in which a CLC group member currently resides. Students residing in the chosen community should be assigned to perform the physical assessment of the community.

    Perform a direct assessment of a community of interest using the “Functional Health Patterns Community Assessment Guide.”

    Interview a community health and public health provider regarding that person’s role and experiences within the community. NRS-427 Functional Health Patterns Community Assessment Essay Assignment Papers.

    Interview Guidelines

    Interviews can take place in-person, by phone, or by Skype. Complete the “Provider Interview Acknowledgement Form” and submit with the group presentation.

    Develop one set of interview questions to gather information about the role of the provider in the community and the health issues faced by the chosen community.

    Compile key findings from the interview, including the interview questions used, and submit with the group presentation.

    PowerPoint Presentation

    Within your group, create a PowerPoint presentation of 15-20 slides (slide count does not include title and reference slide) describing the chosen community interest. NRS-427 Functional Health Patterns Community Assessment Essay Assignment Papers.

    Include the following in your presentation:

    Description of community and community boundaries: the people and the geographic, geopolitical, financial, educational level, ethnic, and phenomenological features of the community as well as types of social interactions, common goals and interests, barriers, and challenges, including any identified social determinates of health.

    Summary of community assessment: (a) funding sources and (b) partnerships.

    Summary of interview with community health/public health provider.

    Identification of an issue that is lacking or an opportunity for health promotion. The issue identified can be used for the Community Teaching Plan: Community Teaching Work Plan Proposal assignment.

    A conclusion summarizing your key findings and a discussion of your impressions of the general health of the community.

    In addition to submitting this assignment in the LoudCloud dropbox, email a copy of your submission to RNBSNclientcare@gcu.edu.

    While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. NRS-427 Functional Health Patterns Community Assessment Essay Assignment Papers.

    This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

    You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. NRS-427 Functional Health Patterns Community Assessment Essay Assignment Papers.

    When submitting this assignment, include the interview questions, the interview findings, completed “Provider Interview Acknowledgement Form,” and the community assessment PPT presentation.

    NRS-427V.R.ProviderInterviewAcknowledgementForm_10-14-13.doc
    NRS427V.R.FunctionalHealthPatternsCommAssessment_Student_10-14-13.doc
     NRS-427 Functional Health Patterns Community Assessment Essay Assignment Papers

  • Evolving Practice Of Nursing and Patient Care Delivery Models

    Evolving Practice Of Nursing and Patient Care Delivery Models 

    Details:

    As the country focuses on the restructuring of the U.S. health care delivery system, nurses will continue to play an important role. It is expected that more and more nursing jobs will become available out in the community, and fewer will be available in acute care hospitals.

    Write an informal presentation (500-700 words) to educate nurses about how the practice of nursing is expected to grow and change. Include the concepts of continuity or continuum of care, accountable care organizations (ACO), medical homes, and nurse-managed health clinics. Evolving Practice Of Nursing and Patient Care Delivery Models.

    Share your presentation with nurse colleagues on your unit or department and ask them to offer their impressions of the anticipated changes to health care delivery and the new role of nurses in hospital settings, communities, clinics, and medical homes.

    In 800-1,000 words summarize the feedback shared by three nurse colleagues and discuss whether their impressions are consistent with what you have researched about health reform.

    A minimum of three scholarly references are required for this assignment. Evolving Practice Of Nursing and Patient Care Delivery Models.

  • NSG3036 W2 Project

    WEEK 2/ PROJECT

    Identifying research components. reviewing 
    TWO
     articles (listed below) and completing the following tasks for each one:

    Article Assignments

    ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW

    1-
    Bortz, A., Ashkenazi, T., & Melnikov, S. (2015). 
    Spirituality as a predictive factor for signing an organ donor card.
    Journal of Nursing Scholarship
    , 47(1), 25-33. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12107

    2-Dinkel, S., & Schmidt, K. (2015). 
    Health education needs of incarcerated women.
     
    Journal of Nursing Scholarship
    , 46(4), 229-234. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12079

    INSTRUCTIONS

    Summarize each article utilizing the 
    Week 2 research template
    .see attached please

    · Identify and describe the problem, purpose, and hypothesis or research questions of each study.

    · Analyze and discuss the significance of the research to nursing practice.

    · Identify two details to support the research as qualitative or quantitative.

    · IMPORTANT INSTRUCTIO………..

    · 
    NOTE
    : If a component is absent, student receives a zero for that component.

    Cite all sources in APA format.

     

     

    NSG3036 W2 Project

    Research Template Name

     

    Cite both articles reviewed in APA style:

     

     

     

     

     

    ***In the template, any direct quotes from the articles needs to only include the page number.

     

    Week 2 Template

    Quantitative Article

    Qualitative Article

    Summarize the two assigned articles. In a paragraph, describe in your own words what the study was about and what the researchers found.

     

     

    Identify and describe the problem for each article

     

     

     

    SU_NSG3029_W2Project_Research_Template

    Identified the purpose statement for each article

     

     

    Identified hypothesis and/or research questions depending on the methodology used in the articles.

     

     

    After analyzing, discuss

    each article’s significance to nursing practice.

     

     

    Identify two details to support the study being quantitative or qualitative

  • Quantitative & Qualitative Study Research Critique Guidelines

    Quantitative & Qualitative Study Research Critique Guidelines

    Use the practice problem and a qualitative, peer-reviewed research article you identified in the Topic 1 assignment to complete this assignment.

    In a 1000-1,250 word essay, summarize the study, explain the ways in which the findings might be used in nursing practice, and address ethical considerations associated with the conduct of the study.

    Refer to the resource “Research Critique Guidelines” for suggested headings and content for your paper.

    ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW

    Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

    This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

    You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

    Quantitative & Qualitative Study Research Critique Guidelines

    Research Critique Guidelines

    Qualitative Study

    Background of Study:

    Identify the clinical problem and research problem that led to the study. What was not known about the clinical problem that, if understood, could be used to improve health care delivery or patient outcomes? This gap in knowledge is the research problem.

    How did the author establish the significance of the study? In other words, why should the reader care about this study? Look for statements about human suffering, costs of treatment, or the number of people affected by the clinical problem.

    Identify the purpose of the study. An author may clearly state the purpose of the study or may describe the purpose as the study goals, objectives, or aims.

    List research questions that the study was designed to answer. If the author does not explicitly provide the questions, attempt to infer the questions from the answers.

    Were the purpose and research questions related to the problem?

    Quantitative & Qualitative Study Research Critique Guidelines

    Method of Study:

    Were qualitative methods appropriate to answer the research questions?

    Did the author identify a specific perspective from which the study was developed? If so, what was it?

    Did the author cite quantitative and qualitative studies relevant to the focus of the study? What other types of literature did the author include?

    Are the references current? For qualitative studies, the author may have included studies older than the 5-year limit typically used for quantitative studies. Findings of older qualitative studies may be relevant to a qualitative study.

    Did the author evaluate or indicate the weaknesses of the available studies?

    Did the literature review include adequate information to build a logical argument?

    When a researcher uses the grounded theory method of qualitative inquiry, the researcher may develop a framework or diagram as part of the findings of the study. Was a framework developed from the study findings?

    Quantitative & Qualitative Study Research Critique Guidelines

     

    Results of Study

    What were the study findings?

    What are the implications to nursing?

    Explain how the findings contribute to nursing knowledge/science. Would this impact practice, education, administration, or all areas of nursing?

    Ethical Considerations

    Was the study approved by an Institutional Review Board?

    Was patient privacy protected?

    Were there ethical considerations regarding the treatment or lack of?

    Conclusion

    Emphasize the importance and congruity of the thesis statement.

    Provide a logical wrap-up to bring the appraisal to completion and to leave a lasting impression and take-away points useful in nursing practice.

    Incorporate a critical appraisal and a brief analysis of the utility and applicability of the findings to nursing practice.

    Integrate a summary of the knowledge learned.

    Quantitative & Qualitative Study Research Critique Guidelines

     

    Quantitative Study

    Background of Study:

    Identify the clinical problem and research problem that led to the study. What was not known about the clinical problem that, if understood, could be used to improve health care delivery or patient outcomes? This gap in knowledge is the research problem.

    How did the author establish the significance of the study? In other words, why should the reader care about this study? Look for statements about human suffering, costs of treatment, or the number of people affected by the clinical problem.

    Identify the purpose of the study. An author may clearly state the purpose of the study or may describe the purpose as the study goals, objectives, or aims.

    List research questions that the study was designed to answer. If the author does not explicitly provide the questions, attempt to infer the questions from the answers.

    Were the purpose and research questions related to the problem?

     Methods of Study

    Identify the benefits and risks of participation addressed by the authors. Were there benefits or risks the authors do not identify?

    Was informed consent obtained from the subjects or participants?

    Did it seem that the subjects participated voluntarily in the study?

    Was institutional review board approval obtained from the agency in which the study was conducted?

    Are the major variables (independent and dependent variables) identified and defined? What were these variables?

    How were data collected in this study?

    What rationale did the author provide for using this data collection method?

    Identify the time period for data collection of the study.

    Describe the sequence of data collection events for a participant.

    Describe the data management and analysis methods used in the study.

    Did the author discuss how the rigor of the process was assured? For example, does the author describe maintaining a paper trail of critical decisions that were made during the analysis of the data? Was statistical software used to ensure accuracy of the analysis?

    What measures were used to minimize the effects of researcher bias (their experiences and perspectives)? For example, did two researchers independently analyze the data and compare their analyses?

    Quantitative & Qualitative Study Research Critique Guidelines

    Results of Study

    What is the researcher’s interpretation of findings?

    Are the findings valid or an accurate reflection of reality? Do you have confidence in the findings?

    What limitations of the study were identified by researchers?

    Was there a coherent logic to the presentation of findings?

    What implications do the findings have for nursing practice? For example, can the findings of the study be applied to general nursing practice, to a specific population, or to a specific area of nursing?

    What suggestions are made for further studies?

    Ethical Considerations

    Was the study approved by an Institutional Review Board?

    Was patient privacy protected?

    Were there ethical considerations regarding the treatment or lack of?

    Quantitative & Qualitative Study Research Critique Guidelines

    Conclusion

    Emphasize the importance and congruity of the thesis statement.

    Provide a logical wrap-up to bring the appraisal to completion and to leave a lasting impression and take-away points useful in nursing practice.

    Incorporate a critical appraisal and a brief analysis of the utility and applicability of the findings to nursing practice.

    Integrate a summary of the knowledge learned.

    Reference

    Burns, N., & Grove, S. (2011).
    Understanding nursing research
    (5th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier. Quantitative & Qualitative Study Research Critique Guidelines

  • NR507 Disease Process Presentation Guidelines and Grading Rubric

    NR507 Disease Process Presentation Guidelines and Grading Rubric

    WEEK 6 Recorded Disease Process PRESENTATION

     GUIDELINES and Grading Rubric

    Purpose

    The purpose of the Disease Process Presentation is for learners to:

    Develop professional presentation/communication skills.

    Demonstrate an advancing understanding of pathophysiological processes of body systems that result in the diagnosis and treatment of patients who present with these disorders in these systems.

    Demonstrate the ability to analyze the literature to obtain the most current, evidence-based resources on the assigned disease process.

    Demonstrate and practice professional communication and leadership, while advancing the education of peers. NR507 Disease Process Presentation Guidelines and Grading Rubric.

    Course Outcomes

    Analyze pathophysiological mechanisms associated with select disease states.

    Relate research findings to the management of patients with complex pathophysiologic dysfunction.

    Requirements

    For Week 6 of the course, there is no case study given to you by the faculty. Instead you will be creating a recorded presentation that demonstrates your understanding of a selected disease process. This presentation will be uploaded into the course via Kaltura (see course resource for directions).

    Address the following Criteria:

    Introduce the disease with a brief definition and description.

    Discuss the
    Risk Factors

    and the connection to the

    Etiology
    of the initial injury to the cell/tissue/organ.

    Discuss health care provider implications for prevention of the disease.

    Show the progression from the
    initial injury to the defect
    in the tissue, organ and system functioning.

    Link changes in the tissue, organ, and system functioning
    to the initial presenting signs and symptoms seen in primary care
    of the disease. NR507 Disease Process Presentation Guidelines and Grading Rubric.

    Provide a brief description of how the disease is diagnosed.

    Provide a brief description of the pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions used to treat and manage the disease.

    Summarizes the disease on final slide with concluding remarks; includes implication for nurse practitioner practice.

    Utilizes at least two current (within 5 years), peer-review scholarly sources to support presentation content.

    Reference slide and in-text citations depict references correctly cited according to APA.

    NR507 Disease Process Presentation Guidelines and Grading Rubric

    Presentation Guidelines:

    The presentation should include a PowerPoint presentation which will be recorded using the instructions located in the Course Resource section.

    The presentation should be no more than 15-20 minutes in recorded length.

    The presentation should contain appropriate evidence to support the information presented per APA format.

    Slides should be used as cues to topics and key concepts without lengthy sentences and paragraphs- reading information from slides
    is not
    professional and therefore not acceptable.

    Students need to demonstrate understanding and mastery of content by discussion style presentation.

    NR507 Disease Process Presentation Guidelines and Grading Rubric

    Technology Requirements

    The instructions for using Kaltura are located in the Course Resource section.

    Directions and Grading Criteria

     

    Criterion

    Exceptional

    Outstanding or highest level of performance

    Exceeds

    Very good or high level of performance

    Meets

    Satisfactory level of performance

    Needs

    Improvement

    Poor or failing level of performance

    Developing

    Unsatisfactory level of performance

     

    Total Points Possible = 200

     

     

    Application of Course Knowledge

     

     

     

    70 Points

    61 Points

     

    57 Points

    28 Points

    0 Points

     

    The recorded presentation includes clear presentation of all required concepts:

    -Introduction of disease with brief definition and description.

    -Risk factors with link to etiology provided.

    -Implications of health care provider in disease prevention.

    -Shows progression from the initial injury to the defect in the tissue, organ, and system functioning.

    – Links changes in the tissue, organ, and system functioning to the initial presenting signs and symptoms seen in primary care of the disease.

    – Provides a brief description of how the disease is diagnosed.

    – Provide a brief description of the pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions used to treat and manage the disease.

    All concepts are presented with logical thought process.

    The recorded presentation includes clear presentation of all required concepts and linkages, but may lack some applicability to topic or misses one criteria in some way. NR507 Disease Process Presentation Guidelines and Grading Rubric

     

    The recorded presentation has limited perspective, unclear linkages, insights and/or applicability to topic or does not meet one or more of the criteria of the assignment. NR507 Disease Process Presentation Guidelines and Grading Rubric

     

     

    The recorded presentation contains inaccurate information and is not consistent with current practice. No clear linkages provided. Analysis is minimal.

    The recorded presentation offers no insight or application to the assignment or course content.

     

    Support from Evidence-Based Practice (EBP)

     

    60 Points

     52 Points

     

    49 Points

    24 Points

    0 Points

     

    Scholarly literature is present throughout the presentation. Guidelines regarding disease prevention and pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions are addressed and clearly analyzed.

    Where applicable in the recorded presentation, analysis is partially supported by evidence from appropriate sources published within the last 5 years.

    In-text citations and full references are provided.

    Evidence-based, peer reviewed journal article cited but may not fully support disease prevention and pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions.

    Where applicable in the recorded presentation, analysis is partially supported by evidence.

    Sources may not be scholarly in nature or may be older than 5 years. Guidelines are not used.

    In-text citations and/or full references may be incomplete or missing. NR507 Disease Process Presentation Guidelines and Grading Rubric

     

    Citations to non-scholarly websites given as rationale to support disease prevention and pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions.

     

    Presentation contains no evidence-based practice reference or citation. NR507 Disease Process Presentation Guidelines and Grading Rubric

     

     

    50 Points

    44 Points

    41 Points

          20 Points

    0 Points

     

    Summary of Disease Process

    Summarizes the disease using concise statements that reflect all content covered in the presentation.

    Implications for practice addressed.

    Summarizes the disease using concise statements that reflect all content covered in the presentation.

    Implications for practice not clearly evident.

    Summarizes the disease using concise statements with some content not reflected in the summary.

    Implications for practice not clearly evident or missing. NR507 Disease Process Presentation Guidelines and Grading Rubric

    Summary of the disease process is lacking concise statements and all content not reflected in the summary.

    Implications for practice not addressed or not clearly evident.

    No summary of the disease process provided.

    Implications for practice not addressed.

     

    Professionalism/ Organization

    10 Points

    9 Points

    8 Points

           4 Points

    0 Points

     

    The recorded presentation has clear audio/video. The content flows in a logical, smooth manner. Verbal pauses are limited or absent. Student speaks in a clear cadence and speed.

    The recorded presentation is lacking 1-2 components from the 50 point criteria.

    The recorded presentation is lacking 3-4 components from the 50 point criteria. NR507 Disease Process Presentation Guidelines and Grading Rubric

     

    Presentation presents findings that are sometimes unclear to follow and may not always be relevant to topic and concepts are difficult to follow.

    The audio/video are hard to hear/see. Slides contain lengthy content (student reading from slides). Presentation style lacks flow of ideas and thoughts.

     

    Grammar, Syntax, APA

     

    10 points

    9 points

    8 points

    4 point

    0 points

     

    APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation are accurate, or with zero to one errors.

    Two to four errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted.

    Five to seven errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted.

    Eight to nine errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted. NR507 Disease Process Presentation Guidelines and Grading Rubric

    Post contains ten or greater errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.

    Total Points Possible= 200

     
    NR507_W6_Disease_Process_Presentation_GuidelinesandGradingRubric

    NR507 Disease Process Presentation Guidelines and Grading Rubric

  • A loss of social eating: the experience of individuals living with gastroparesis – Jose Bennell and Claire Taylor

    A loss of social eating: the experience of individuals living with gastroparesis – Jose Bennell and Claire Taylor

    Qualitative article wk6

    A loss of social eating: the experience of individuals living with gastroparesis – Jose Bennell and Claire Taylor