Author: admin

  • “Captain of the Ship” Project – Depressive Disorder Assignment

    “Captain of the Ship” Project – Depressive Disorder Assignment

    Week 2: Depressive Disorders

    I have no one. My wife died suddenly 4 years ago and I know it was my fault. She had been complaining she was sick for a year, but the doctors kept saying it was nothing. When they finally found the cancer, it had spread throughout her body. I should have listened to her. She might have survived and I would not be alone. I seem to cry for no reason and my children don’t understand why I don’t want to go out of the house. This is where her memories are. Why would I want to leave? “Captain of the Ship” Project – Depressive Disorder Assignment.

    Jose, age 75

    The National Institutes of Mental Health acknowledges that depression is one of the most common mental disorders in the United States. It is associated with significant disability, fiscal impact, and considerable personal suffering. It may have significant impact on the individual, their family, and their social network. The PMHNP must be capable of providing comprehensive care for depressive disorders, including both psychotherapy and psychopharmacologic approaches. “Captain of the Ship” Project – Depressive Disorder Assignment.

    This week, you will become “captain of the ship” as you take full responsibility for a client with a depressive disorder. You will recommend psychopharmacologic treatment and psychotherapy, identify medical management needs and community support, and recommend follow-up plans. You will also explore how to obtain a DEA license and the responsibilities for safe prescribing and prescription monitoring.

    ORDER A CUSTOM-WRITTEN PAPER NOW

    Learning Resources

    Note:
    To access this week’s required library resources, please click on the link to the Course Readings List, found in the
    Course Materials
    section of your Syllabus.

    Required Readings

    Sadock, B. J., Sadock, V. A., & Ruiz, P. (2014).
    Kaplan & Sadock’s synopsis of psychiatry: Behavioral sciences/clinical psychiatry
    (11th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer. “Captain of the Ship” Project – Depressive Disorder Assignment.

    Chapter 8, “Mood Disorders” (pp. 347–386)

    Gabbard, G. O. (2014).
    Gabbard’s treatment of psychiatric disorders
    (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publications.

    Chapter 12, “Psychotherapy of Mood Disorders”

    Chapter 14, “Pharmacological and Somatic Treatments for Major Depressive Disorder”

    Note:
    You will access this textbook from the Walden Library databases.

    American Psychiatric Association. (2013).
    Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders
    (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

    “Depressive Disorders”

    Major Depressive Disorder

    Persistent Depressive Disorder (dysthymia)

    Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder

    Substance/Medication-Induced Depressive Disorder

    Depressive Disorder Due to Another Medical Condition

    Other Specified Depressive Disorder

    Unspecified Depressive Disorder

    Stahl, S. M. (2014).
    Prescriber’s Guide: Stahl’s Essential Psychopharmacology
    (5th ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. “Captain of the Ship” Project – Depressive Disorder Assignment.

     

    Note:
    All Stahl resources can be accessed through the Walden Library using the link below. This link will take you to a login page for the Walden Library. Once you log in to the library, the Stahl website will appear. http://ezp.waldenulibrary.org/login?url=http://stahlonline.cambridge.org/

     

    To access information on specific medications, click on
    The Prescriber’s Guide, 5th Ed
    . tab on the Stahl Online website and select the appropriate medication.

    Depression

    Premenstrual dysphoric disorder

    Seasonal affective disorder (MDD with Seasonal Variation)

    agomelatine

    amisulpride

    amitriptyline

    amoxapine

    amphetamine (d)

    amphetamine (d,l)

    aripiprazole (adjunct)

    asenapine

    atomoxetine

    bupropion

    buspirone (adjunct)

    citalopram

    clomipramine

    cyamemazine

    desipramine

    desvenlafaxine

    dothiepin

    paroxetine

    phenelzine

    protriptyline

    quetiapine (adjunct)

    reboxetine

    selegiline

    sertindole

    sertraline

    sulpiride

    tianeptine

    tranylcypromine

    triiodothyronine

    trazodone

    trimipramine

    venlafaxine

    vilazodone

    vortioxetine

    doxepin

    duloxetine

    escitalopram

    fluoxetine

    flupenthixol

    fluvoxamine

    iloperidone

    imipramine

    isocarboxazid

    ketamine

    lisdexamfetamine

    lithium (adjunct)

    l-methylfolate (adjunct)

    lofepramine

    lurasidone

    maprotiline

    methylphenidate (d)

    methylphenidate (d,l)

    mianserin

    milnacipran

    mirtazapine

    moclobemide

    modafinil (adjunct)

    nefazodone

    nortriptyline

    olanzapine

    citalopram

    desvenlafaxine

    escitalopram

    fluoxetine

    paroxetine

    sertraline

    venlafaxine

    bupropion. “Captain of the Ship” Project – Depressive Disorder Assignment

    Grieve, S. M., Korgaonkar, M. S., Koslow, S. H., Gordon, E., Williams, L. M. (2013). Widespread reductions in gray matter volume in depression.
    NeuroImage: Clinical, 3
    , 332-339. doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2013.08.016

    Note:
    You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

    Lach, H. W., Chang, Y-P., & Edwards, D. (2010). Can older adults with dementia accurately report depression using brief forms? Reliability and validity of the Geriatric Depression Scale.
    Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 36
    (5), 30–37. doi:10.3928/00989134-20100303-01

    Note:
    You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

    Steffens, D. C., McQuoid, D. R., & Potter, G. G. (2014). Amnestic mild cognitive impairment and incident dementia and Alzheimer’s disease in geriatric depression.
    International Psychogeriatrics, 26
    (12), 2029–2036. doi:10.1017/S1041610214001446

    Note:
    You will access this article from the Walden Library databases. “Captain of the Ship” Project – Depressive Disorder Assignment.

    Drug Enforcement Administration. (n.d.).
    Drug schedules
    . Retrieved June 14, 2016, from https://www.dea.gov/druginfo/ds.shtml

    Required Media

    Hagen, B. (Producer). (n.d.-b).
    Managing depression
    [Video file]. Mill Valley, CA: Psychotherapy.net.

     

    Note:
    The approximate length of this media piece is 24 minutes. You will access this video through the Walden Library databases.

    Optional Resources

    Gabbard, G. O. (2014).
    Gabbard’s treatment of psychiatric disorders
    (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publications.

    Chapter 15, “Brain Stimulation Treatments for Mood Disorders”

    Note:
    You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

    Ahern, E., & Semkovska, M. (2017). Cognitive functioning in the first-episode of major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Neuropsychology, 31
    (1), 52–72. doi:10.1037/neu0000319

    Note:
    You will access this article from the Walden Library databases. “Captain of the Ship” Project – Depressive Disorder Assignment.

    Anderson, N. D., Damianakis, T., Kröger, E., Wagner, L. M., Dawson, D. R., Binns, M. A., . . . Cook, S. L. (2014). The benefits associated with volunteering among seniors: A critical review and recommendations for future research.
    Psychological Bulletin, 140
    (6), 1505–1533. doi:10.1037/a0037610

    Note:
    You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

    Inoue, J., Hoshino, R., Nojima, H., Ishida, W., & Okamoto, N. (2016). Additional donepezil treatment for patients with geriatric depression who exhibit cognitive deficit during treatment for depression.
    Psychogeriatrics, 16
    (1), 54–61. doi:10.1111/psyg.12121

    Note:
    You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

    Sachs-Ericsson, N., Corsentino, E., Moxley, J., Hames, J. L., Rushing, N. C., Sawyer, K., . . . Steffens, D. C. (2013). A longitudinal study of differences in late- and early-onset geriatric depression: Depressive symptoms and psychosocial, cognitive, and neurological functioning.
    Aging & Mental Health, 17
    (1), 1–11. doi:10.1080/13607863.2012.717253

    Note:
    You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

    Shallcross, A. J., Gross, J. J., Visvanathan, P. D., Kumar, N., Palfrey, A., Ford, B. Q., . . . Mauss, I. B. (2015). Relapse prevention in major depressive disorder: Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy versus an active control condition.
    Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 83
    (5), 964–975. doi:10.1037/ccp0000050

    Note:
    You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

    Wanklyn, S. G., Pukay-Martin, N. D., Belus, J. M., St. Cyr, K., Girard, T. A., & Monson, C. M. (2016). Trauma types as differential predictors of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), major depressive disorder (MDD), and their comorbidity.
    Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue Canadienne Des Sciences Du Comportement, 48
    (4), 296–305. doi:10.1037/cbs0000056

    Note:
    You will access this article from the Walden Library databases. “Captain of the Ship” Project – Depressive Disorder Assignment.

    Assignment 1: “Captain of the Ship” Project – Depressive Disorder

    As nurse practitioners strive to achieve full-autonomous practice across the country, it should be noted that many states grant this ability to practice independently to psychiatric mental health nurse practitioners. To that end, you will be engaging in projects this semester that assume that you are practicing in a state that allows full-practice authority for NPs, meaning that the PMHNP may be the “captain of the ship” concerning caring for a patient population. The “captain of the ship” is the one who makes referrals to specialists, coordinates care for their patients/clients, and is responsible and accountable for patient/client outcomes overall. This is a decided change from a few decades ago when physicians were the “captain of the ship” and NPs played a peripheral role.

    In this Assignment, you will become the “captain of the ship” as you provide treatment recommendations and identify medical management, community support resources, and follow-up plans for a client with a depression disorder. “Captain of the Ship” Project – Depressive Disorder Assignment.

    Learning Objectives

    Students will:

    Recommend psychopharmacologic treatments based on therapeutic endpoints for clients with depression disorders

    Recommend psychotherapy based on therapeutic endpoints for clients with depression disorders

    Identify medical management needs for clients with depression disorders

    Identify community support resources for clients with depression disorders

    Recommend follow-up plans for clients with depression disorders

    To prepare for this Assignment:

    Select an adult or older adult client with a depressive disorder you have seen in your practicum.

    In 3–4 pages, write a treatment plan for your client in which you do the following:

    Describe the HPI and clinical impression for the client.

    Recommend psychopharmacologic treatments and describe specific and therapeutic endpoints for your psychopharmacologic agent. (This should relate to HPI and clinical impression.)

    Recommend psychotherapy choices (individual, family, and group) and specific therapeutic endpoints for your choices. “Captain of the Ship” Project – Depressive Disorder Assignment.

    Identify medical management needs, including primary care needs, specific to this client.

    Identify community support resources (housing, socioeconomic needs, etc.) and community agencies that are available to assist the client.

    Recommend a plan for follow-up intensity and frequency and collaboration with other providers. “Captain of the Ship” Project – Depressive Disorder Assignment.

    By Day 7

    Submit
    your Assignment.

    Submission and Grading Information

    To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

    Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK2Assgn1+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.

    Click the
    Week 2 Assignment 1 Rubric
    to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.

    Click the
    Week 2 Assignment 1
    link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.

    Next, from the Attach File area, click on the
    Browse My Computer
    button. Find the document you saved as “WK2Assgn1+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click
    Open
    .

    If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for
    I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database
    .

    Click on the
    Submit
    button to complete your submission.

    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Week 2 Assignment 1 Rubric

    Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

    To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

    Submit your Week 2 Assignment 1 draft and review the originality report. “Captain of the Ship” Project – Depressive Disorder Assignment.

    Submit Your Assignment by Day 7

    To submit your Assignment:

    Week 2 Assignment 1

    Assignment 2: Week 2 Practicum Journal: Safe Prescribing

    There is probably no greater responsibility that the psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner assumes than the responsibility of prescribing medications. While someone can be harmed by psychotherapy, the level and intensity of the harm generally does not come to the same level of harm that can occur from improper prescribing. The PMHNP must understand his/her responsibility both at a state and federal level when it comes to prescribing medications. “Captain of the Ship” Project – Depressive Disorder Assignment.

    In this Practicum Journal Assignment, you will explore the legalities associated with prescribing controlled substances, as well as what a DEA number is, how to obtain one, and, most importantly, how to prescribe controlled substances in your state. “Captain of the Ship” Project – Depressive Disorder Assignment.

    Learning Objectives

    Students will:

    Analyze roles of the Drug Enforcement Administration

    Analyze PMHNP responsibilities when issued a DEA number

    Analyze DEA number application procedures. “Captain of the Ship” Project – Depressive Disorder Assignment.

    Analyze state requirements for safe prescribing and prescription monitoring

    Analyze PMHNP responsibilities for safe prescribing and prescription monitoring

    Analyze Schedule II-V drug levels

    ** Assigned in Week 2 and submitted in Week 4.

    To prepare for this Practicum Journal:

    Review the Learning Resources.

    In 2-3 pages:

    Describe the role of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) as it pertains to the PMHNP.

    Explain your responsibilities when having a DEA number. “Captain of the Ship” Project – Depressive Disorder Assignment.

    Explain how you apply for a DEA number.

    Explain your state’s requirements for a safe prescribing and prescription monitoring program. Explain your responsibility as a PMHNP to follow these requirements.

    Provide an example of a drug you may prescribe from each of the Schedule II-V drug levels.

    By Day 7

    Submit
    by Day 7 of Week 4.

    Assignment 3: Board Vitals

    This week you will be responding to twenty Board Vitals questions that cover a broad review of your Nurse Practitioner program courses up to this point. “Captain of the Ship” Project – Depressive Disorder Assignment.

    These review questions will provide practice that is critical in your preparation for the national certification exam that’s required to certify you to practice as a nurse practitioner. These customized test questions are designed to help you prepare for your Nurse Practitioner certification exam. It is in your best interest to take your time, do your best, and answer each question to the best of your ability. “Captain of the Ship” Project – Depressive Disorder Assignment.

    You can access Board Vitals through the link sent to you in email or by following the link below:

    https://www.boardvitals.com/

    By Day 7

    Complete the Board Vitals questions.

    Making Connections

    This week, you became “captain of the ship” as you took full responsibility for a client with a depressive disorder by recommending psychopharmacologic treatment and psychotherapy, identifying medical management needs and community support, and recommending follow-up plans. You also explored how to obtain a DEA license and the responsibilities for safe prescribing and prescription monitoring. “Captain of the Ship” Project – Depressive Disorder Assignment.

    Next week, you will explore the many personality disorders and use the DSM-5 criteria for diagnosing individuals with specific personality disorders. You will use the Decision Tree format to diagnose and treat a client with a personality disorder. You also will complete the Fitzgerald University Exit Comprehensive Exam to determine your readiness for the certification exam.

    NURS_6670_Week2_Assignment1_Rubric

    Grid View

    List View

    Excellent

    Good

    Fair

    Poor

    Quality of Work Submitted: The extent of which work meets the assignned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking.

    Points Range:
    27
    (27%)
    – 30
    (30%)

    Assignment exceeds expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 75% containing exceptional breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics.

    Points Range:
    24
    (24%)
    – 26
    (26%)

    Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing good breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics.

    Points Range:
    21
    (21%)
    – 23
    (23%)

    Assignment meets most of the expectations. One required topic is either not addressed or inadequately addressed.

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 20
    (20%)

    Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not addressed or inadequately addressed.

    Quality of Work Submitted: The purpose of the paper is clear.

    Points Range:
    5
    (5%)
    – 5
    (5%)

    A clear and comprehensive purpose statement is provided which delineates all required criteria.

    Points Range:
    4
    (4%)
    – 4
    (4%)

    Purpose of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

    Points Range:
    3.5
    (3.5%)
    – 3.5
    (3.5%)

    Purpose of the assignment is vague or off topic. “Captain of the Ship” Project – Depressive Disorder Assignment.

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 3
    (3%)

    No purpose statement was provided.

    Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:

    Understand and interpret the assignment’s key concepts.

    Points Range:
    9
    (9%)
    – 10
    (10%)

    Demonstrates the ability to critically appraise and intellectually explore key concepts.

    Points Range:
    8
    (8%)
    – 8
    (8%)

    Demonstrates a clear understanding of key concepts. “Captain of the Ship” Project – Depressive Disorder Assignment.

    Points Range:
    7
    (7%)
    – 7
    (7%)

    Shows some degree of understanding of key concepts.

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 6
    (6%)

    Shows a lack of understanding of key concepts, deviates from topics.

    Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:

    Apply and integrate material in course rsources (i.e. video, required readings, and textook) and credible outside resources.

    Points Range:
    18
    (18%)
    – 20
    (20%)

    Demonstrates and applies exceptional support of major points and integrates 2 or more credible outside sources, in addition to 2-3 course resources to suppport point of view.

    Points Range:
    16
    (16%)
    – 17
    (17%)

    Integrates specific information from 1 credible outside resource and 2-3 course resources to support major points and point of view.

    Points Range:
    14
    (14%)
    – 15
    (15%)

    Minimally includes and integrates specific information from 2-3 resources to support major points and point of view.

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 13
    (13%)

    Includes and integrates specific information from 0 to 1 resoruce to support major points and point of view.

    Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:

    Synthesize (combines various components or different ideas into a new whole) material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, textbook) and outside, credible resources by comparing different points of view and highlighting similarities, differences, and connections.

    Points Range:
    18
    (18%)
    – 20
    (20%)

    Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from sources to support major points presented. Applies meaning to the field of advanced nursing practice.

    Points Range:
    16
    (16%)
    – 17
    (17%)

    Summarizes information gleaned from sources to support major points, but does not synthesize.

    Points Range:
    14
    (14%)
    – 15
    (15%)

    Identifies but does not interpret or apply concepts, and/or strategies correctly; ideas unclear and/or underdeveloped. “Captain of the Ship” Project – Depressive Disorder Assignment.

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 13
    (13%)

    Rarely or does not interpret, apply, and synthesize concepts, and/or strategies.

    Written Expression and Formatting

    Paragraph and Sentence Structure: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are clearly structured and carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.

    Points Range:
    5
    (5%)
    – 5
    (5%)

    Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity

    Points Range:
    4
    (4%)
    – 4
    (4%)

    Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 80% of the time.

    Points Range:
    3.5
    (3.5%)
    – 3.5
    (3.5%)

    Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 3
    (3%)

    Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity < 60% of the time. “Captain of the Ship” Project – Depressive Disorder Assignment. Written Expression and Formatting English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Written Expression and Formatting The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors. Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3-4) APA format errors. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. “Captain of the Ship” Project – Depressive Disorder Assignment.

  • Fitzgerald Health Education Associates (FHEA) PMHNP 150 University Exit Comprehensive Exam

    Fitzgerald Health Education Associates (FHEA) PMHNP 150 University Exit Comprehensive Exam

    Week 3: Personality Disorders

    I cannot believe these people. Don’t they know who I am? I deserve better treatment than this. That hostess should have seated me immediately, but I had to wait for 10 minutes and then she put me at this table right by the kitchen. I see an empty table right in the middle where I should be. I am just going to get up and move there. I don’t care what the hostess says, rules don’t apply to me. Fitzgerald Health Education Associates (FHEA) PMHNP 150 University Exit Comprehensive Exam

    Ashley, age 25

    Personality disorders represent perhaps the most challenging disorders that the psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner will have to address in their professional careers. Personality disorders can co-occur in every mental health disorder and, in some cases, can mask as disorder . Although difficult to treat, the PMHNP must be able to identify personality disorders and endeavor to work with the client to not only recognize the disorder, but to treat a disorder that clients often do not believe they have.

    This week, you will explore the many personality disorders and use the DSM-5 criteria for diagnosing individuals with specific personality disorders. You will use the Decision Tree format to diagnose and treat a client with a personality disorder. You also will complete the Fitzgerald University Exit Comprehensive Exam to determine your readiness for the certification exam.

    ORDER A CUSTOM-WRITTEN PAPER NOW
     

    Learning Resources

    Note:
    To access this week’s required library resources, please click on the link to the Course Readings List, found in the
    Course Materials
    section of your Syllabus.

    Required Readings

    Sadock, B. J., Sadock, V. A., & Ruiz, P. (2014).
    Kaplan & Sadock’s synopsis of psychiatry: Behavioral sciences/clinical psychiatry
    (11th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer. Fitzgerald Health Education Associates (FHEA) PMHNP 150 University Exit Comprehensive Exam.

    Chapter 4, “Theories of Personality and Psychopathology” (pp. 151–191)

    Chapter 22, “Personality Disorders” (pp. 742–762)

    Chapter 13, “Psychosomatic Medicine” (pp. 451–464)

    Gabbard, G. O. (2014).
    Gabbard’s treatment of psychiatric disorders
    (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publications.

    Chapter 68, “Paranoid, Schizotypal, and Schizoid Personality Disorders”

    Chapter 69, “Antisocial Personality Disorder”

    Chapter 70, “Borderline Personality Disorder”

    Chapter 71, “Histrionic Personality Disorder”

    Chapter 72, “Narcissistic Personality Disorder”

    Chapter 73, “Cluster C Personality Disorders

    Note:
    You will access this book from Walden Library databases.

    American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

    “Personality Disorders”

    Note:
    You will access this book from Walden Library databases.

    Perry, J. C., Presniak, M. D., & Olson, T. R. (2013). Defense mechanisms in schizotypal, borderline, antisocial, and narcissistic personality disorders.
    Psychiatry: Interpersonal & Biological Processes, 76
    (1), 32–52. doi:10.1521/psyc.2013.76.1.32

    Note:
    You will access this article from Walden Library databases.

    Rees, C. S., & Pritchard, R. (2015).
    Brief cognitive therapy for avoidant personality disorder. Psychotherapy, 52
    (1), 45–55. doi:10.1037/a0035158

    Note:
    You will access this article from Walden Library databases. Fitzgerald Health Education Associates (FHEA) PMHNP 150 University Exit Comprehensive Exam.

    Required Media

    Laureate Education. (2017a).
    A woman with personality disorder
    [Interactive media file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Kernberg, O. (n.d.).
    Psychoanalytic psychotherapy for personality disorders: An Interview with Otto Kernberg
    , MD. [Video file]. Mill Valley, CA: Psychotherapy.net

    Note:
    This video is approximately 94 minutes of length. You will access this article from Walden Library databases.

    Discussion: Treatment of Personality Disorders

    Personality disorders occur in 10–20% of the population. They are difficult to treat as individuals with personality disorders are less likely to seek help than individuals with other mental health disorders. Treatment can be challenging as they do not see their symptoms as painful to themselves or others.

    In this Discussion, you will explore personality disorders in greater detail and discuss treatment options using evidence-based research. Fitzgerald Health Education Associates (FHEA) PMHNP 150 University Exit Comprehensive Exam.

    Learning Objectives

    Students will:

    Analyze diagnostic criteria for personality disorders

    Analyze evidence-based psychotherapy and psychopharmacologic treatments for personality disorders

    Analyze clinical features of clients with personality disorders

    Align clinical features with DSM-5 criteria

    Compare differential diagnostic features of personality disorders

    Note:
    For this Discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the “Post to Discussion Question” link and then select “Create Thread” to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click submit, you cannot delete or edit your own posts, and cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking
    Submit
    !

    To prepare for this Discussion:

    By Day 5 of Week 2, your Instructor will have assigned you a personality disorder, which will be your focus for your initial post for this Discussion.

    Review the Learning Resources.

    By Day 3

    Post:

    Explain the diagnostic criteria for your assigned personality disorder.

    Explain the evidenced-based psychotherapy and psychopharmacologic treatment for your assigned personality disorder.

    Describe clinical features from a client that led you to believe this client had this disorder. Align the clinical features with the DSM-5 criteria.

    Support your rationale with references to the Learning Resources or other academic resources.

    By Day 6

    Respond
    to at least
    two
    of your colleagues by comparing the differential diagnostic features of the disorder you were assigned to the diagnostic features of the disorder your colleagues were assigned. What are their similarities and differences? How might you differentiate the two diagnoses? Fitzgerald Health Education Associates (FHEA) PMHNP 150 University Exit Comprehensive Exam.

    Submission and Grading Information

    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Week 3 Discussion Rubric

    Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6

    To participate in this Discussion:

    Week 3 Discussion

    Assignment 1: Decision Tree

    For this Assignment, as you examine the client case study in this week’s Learning Resources, consider how you might assess and treat adult and older adult clients presenting symptoms of a mental health disorder.

    Learning Objectives

    Students will:

    Evaluate clients for treatment of mental health disorders

    Analyze decisions made throughout diagnosis and treatment of clients with mental health disorders

    ** Assigned in Week 3 and submitted in Week 4

    Examine
    Case 1
    : You will be asked to make three decisions concerning the diagnosis and treatment for this client. Be sure to consider co-morbid physical as well as mental factors that might impact the client’s diagnosis and treatment.

    At each Decision Point, stop to complete the following:

    Decision #1: Differential Diagnosis

    Which Decision did you select?

    Why did you select this Decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.

    What were you hoping to achieve by making this Decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.

    Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with Decision #1 and the results of the Decision. Why were they different? Fitzgerald Health Education Associates (FHEA) PMHNP 150 University Exit Comprehensive Exam

    Decision #2: Treatment Plan for Psychotherapy

    Why did you select this Decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.

    What were you hoping to achieve by making this Decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.

    Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with Decision #2 and the results of the Decision. Why were they different?

    Decision #3: Treatment Plan for Psychopharmacology

    Why did you select this Decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.

    What were you hoping to achieve by making this Decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.

    Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with Decision #3 and the results of the decision. Why were they different?

    Also include how ethical considerations might impact your treatment plan and communication with clients and their family.

    Note:
    Support your rationale with a minimum of three academic resources. While you may use the course text to support your rationale, it will not count toward the resource requirement. Fitzgerald Health Education Associates (FHEA) PMHNP 150 University Exit Comprehensive Exam.

    By Day 7

    Submit
    by Day 7 of Week 4.

    Assignment 2: Fitzgerald Health Education Associates (FHEA) PMHNP 150 University Exit Comprehensive Exam

    In Weeks 1 or 2 of this course, you received an e-mail from Fitzgerald Health Education Associates (FHEA) explaining how to access the Fitzgerald Health Education Associates (FHEA) PMHNP 150 University Exit Comprehensive Exam. Please follow the directions FHEA provided and complete the exam. You must complete the exam by Day 7 of Week 3 to receive a grade. Each exam is worth 100 points and 10% of your grade. The 3-hour exam is required and will provide you with an overall view of your preparedness for the certification exam. Fitzgerald Health Education Associates (FHEA) PMHNP 150 University Exit Comprehensive Exam.

    Note:
    Your Instructor receives the results and will inform you when the results are available. Do not e-mail the Fitzgerald site.

    Assignment 3: Board Vitals

    This week you will be responding to twenty Board Vitals questions that cover a broad review of your Nurse Practitioner program courses up to this point. Fitzgerald Health Education Associates (FHEA) PMHNP 150 University Exit Comprehensive Exam.

    These review questions will provide practice that is critical in your preparation for the national certification exam that’s required to certify you to practice as a nurse practitioner. These customized test questions are designed to help you prepare for your Nurse Practitioner certification exam. It is in your best interest to take your time, do your best, and answer each question to the best of your ability.

    https://www.boardvitals.com/

    By Day 7

    Complete the Board Vitals questions.

    Making Connections

    This week, you explored the many personality disorders and used the DSM-5 criteria for diagnosing individuals with specific personality disorders. You used the Decision Tree format to diagnose and treat a client with a personality disorder. You also completed the Fitzgerald University Exit Comprehensive Exam to determine your readiness for the certification exam. Fitzgerald Health Education Associates (FHEA) PMHNP 150 University Exit Comprehensive Exam.

    Next week, you will analyze clients presenting for treatment of substance-related and addictive disorders and evaluate effectiveness of therapeutic approaches for clients diagnosed with substance-related and addictive disorders.

    NURS_6670_Week3_Discussion_Rubric

    Grid View

    List View

    Outstanding Performance

    Excellent Performance

    Competent Performance

    Proficient Performance

    Room for Improvement

    Main Posting: Response to the discusion question is reflecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

    Points Range:
    44
    (44%)
    – 44
    (44%)

    * Thoroughly responds to the discusion question(s) *is reflecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. * supported by at least 3 current, credible sources

    Points Range:
    40
    (40%)
    – 43
    (43%)

    * Responds to the discusion question(s) *is reflecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module. * 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth * supported by at least 3 credible references. Fitzgerald Health Education Associates (FHEA) PMHNP 150 University Exit Comprehensive Exam

    Points Range:
    35
    (35%)
    – 39
    (39%)

    * Responds to most of the discusion question(s) *is somewhat reflecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module. * 50% of post has exceptional depth and breadth * supported by at least 3 credible references

    Points Range:
    31
    (31%)
    – 34
    (34%)

    * Responds to some of the discusion question(s) * one to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addresed *is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis *somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. * post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 30
    (30%)

    * Does not respond to the discusion question(s) * lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria *lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis *does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. * contains only 1 or no credible references

    Main Posting: Writing

    Points Range:
    6
    (6%)
    – 6
    (6%)

    * Written clearly and concisely * Contains no grammatical or spelling errors * Fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style

    Points Range:
    5.5
    (5.5%)
    – 5.5
    (5.5%)

    * Written clearly and concisely * May contain one or no grammatical or spelling error * Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style

    Points Range:
    5
    (5%)
    – 5
    (5%)

    * Written concisely * May contain one to two grammatical or spelling error * Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style

    Points Range:
    4
    (4%)
    – 5
    (5%)

    *Writtten somewhat concisely * May contain more than two2 spelling or grammatical errors * Contains some APA formatting erros

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 4
    (4%)

    * Not written clearly or concisely * Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors * Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style

    Main Posting: Timely and full participation

    Points Range:
    10
    (10%)
    – 10
    (10%)

    * meets requirements for timely and full participation * posts main discussion by due date

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 0
    (0%)

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 0
    (0%)

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 0
    (0%)

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 6
    (6%)

    * does not meet requirement for full participation

    First Reponse

    Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.

    Points Range:
    9
    (9%)
    – 9
    (9%)

    * response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings * responds to questions posed by faculty * the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives

    Points Range:
    8.5
    (8.5%)
    – 8.5
    (8.5%)

    * response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings

    Points Range:
    7.5
    (7.5%)
    – 8
    (8%)

    * response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting

    Points Range:
    6.5
    (6.5%)
    – 7
    (7%)

    * response is on topic, may have some depth. Fitzgerald Health Education Associates (FHEA) PMHNP 150 University Exit Comprehensive Exam

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 6
    (6%)

    * reponse may not be on topic, lacks depth

    First Reponse: Writing

    Points Range:
    6
    (6%)
    – 6
    (6%)

    * Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed * Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources * Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

    Points Range:
    5.5
    (5.5%)
    – 5.5
    (5.5%)

    * Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are answered if posed * Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources * Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

    Points Range:
    5
    (5%)
    – 5
    (5%)

    * Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed * Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources * Response is written in Standard Edited English

    Points Range:
    4.5
    (4.5%)
    – 4.5
    (4.5%)

    * Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication * Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed * Few or no credible sources are cited

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 4
    (4%)

    * Responses posted in the discussion lack effective * Response to faculty questions are missing * No credible sources are cited. Fitzgerald Health Education Associates (FHEA) PMHNP 150 University Exit Comprehensive Exam

    First Reponse: Timely and full participation

    Points Range:
    5
    (5%)
    – 5
    (5%)

    * meets requirements for timely and full participation * posts by due date

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 0
    (0%)

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 0
    (0%)

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 0
    (0%)

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 0
    (0%)

    * does not meet requirement for full participation

    Second Reponse: Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.

    Points Range:
    9
    (9%)
    – 9
    (9%)

    * response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings * responds to questions posed by faculty * the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives

    Points Range:
    8.5
    (8.5%)
    – 8.5
    (8.5%)

    * response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings

    Points Range:
    7.5
    (7.5%)
    – 8
    (8%)

    * response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting

    Points Range:
    6.5
    (6.5%)
    – 7
    (7%)

    * response is on topic, may have some depth

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 6
    (6%)

    * reponse may not be on topic, lacks depth. Fitzgerald Health Education Associates (FHEA) PMHNP 150 University Exit Comprehensive Exam

    Second Reponse: Writing

    Points Range:
    6
    (6%)
    – 6
    (6%)

    * Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed * Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources * Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

    Points Range:
    5.5
    (5.5%)
    – 5.5
    (5.5%)

    * Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are answered if posed * Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources * Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

    Points Range:
    5
    (5%)
    – 5
    (5%)

    * Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed * Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources * Response is written in Standard Edited English

    Points Range:
    4.5
    (4.5%)
    – 4.5
    (4.5%)

    * Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication * Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed * Few or no credible sources are cited

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 4
    (4%)

    * Responses posted in the discussion lack effective * Response to faculty questions are missing * No credible sources are cited

    Second Reponse: Timely and full participation

    Points Range:
    5
    (5%)
    – 5
    (5%)

    * meets requirements for timely and full participation * posts by due date

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 0
    (0%)

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 0
    (0%)

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 0
    (0%)

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 0
    (0%)

    * does not meet requirement for full participation. Fitzgerald Health Education Associates (FHEA) PMHNP 150 University Exit Comprehensive Exam

  • Clinical Supervision – Kaltura, Certification Plan, Safe Prescribing and Decision Tree

    Clinical Supervision – Kaltura, Certification Plan, Safe Prescribing and Decision Tree

    Week 4: Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders

    I can’t believe that stupid horse lost! My inside man told me it was a sure bet at 20:1 odds. I thought for sure that I would be able to make back the money I lost yesterday. What am I going to tell my wife? That was the money for the mortgage payment…well, the last three mortgage payments. She does not know I have been spending my days at the track. I lost my job at the company because a few hundred dollars went missing. I just need a break. I know this next horse will be my winner!

    Michael, age 37

    Substance abuse and addiction affects persons in all walks of life; every ethnic and economic group is affected in some way by addiction or substance abuse. In your practice as a PMHNP, you will encounter patients with substance abuse and dependence. Some of the people who present for treatment are at a low point in their lives and want to turn things around. They may present for other conditions such as depression or bipolar disorder, anxiety, PTSD, or personality disorders. One of the most common ways of self-medicating a mental illness is with alcohol and illicit drugs. Marijuana is a common substance used by clients to treat various symptoms. To effectively treat clients with addictive disorders and substance use disorders, the provider needs to examine their own values and thoughts about the use of substances. Clinical Supervision – Kaltura, Certification Plan, Safe Prescribing and Decision Tree

    This week, you will analyze clients presenting for treatment of substance-related and addictive disorders and evaluate effectiveness of therapeutic approaches for clients diagnosed with substance-related and addictive disorders.

    ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

    Learning Resources

    Note:
    To access this week’s required library resources, please click on the link to the Course Readings List, found in the
    Course Materials
    section of your Syllabus. Clinical Supervision – Kaltura, Certification Plan, Safe Prescribing and Decision Tree

    Required Readings

    Sadock, B. J., Sadock, V. A., & Ruiz, P. (2014).
    Kaplan & Sadock’s synopsis of psychiatry: Behavioral sciences/clinical psychiatry
    (11th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.

    Chapter 20, “Substance Use and Addictive Disorders” (pp. 616–693)

    American Psychiatric Association. (2013).
    Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders
    (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

    Note:
    You will access this book from the Walden Library databases.

    Stahl, S. M. (2014).
    Prescriber’s Guide: Stahl’s Essential Psychopharmacology
    (5th ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

     

    Note:
    All Stahl resources can be accessed through the Walden Library using the link below. This link will take you to a login page for the Walden Library. Once you log in to the library, the Stahl website will appear. http://ezp.waldenulibrary.org/login?url=http://stahlonline.cambridge.org/. Clinical Supervision – Kaltura, Certification Plan, Safe Prescribing and Decision Tree

     

    To access information on specific medications, click on
    The Prescriber’s Guide, 5th Ed
    . tab on the Stahl Online website and select the appropriate medication.

    Alcohol abstinence

    Alcohol dependence

    Alcohol withdrawal

    Nicotine addiction

    Opioid dependence

    Reversal of benzodiazepine effects

    acamprosate

    disulfiram

    nalmefene

    naltrexone

    chlordiazepoxide

    clonidine

    clorazepate

    diazepam

    lorazepam

    oxazepam

    bupropin

    varenicline

    buprenorphine

    naltrexone

    flumazenil

    Note:
    For more information about buprenorphine, see https: //www.samhsa.gov/medication-assisted-treatment/qualify-nps-pas-waivers. Clinical Supervision – Kaltura, Certification Plan, Safe Prescribing and Decision Tree

    Required Media

    Ashwood, D. (Producer). (n.d.-a).
    Mindfulness-based relapse prevention for addictions: Volume I
    [Video file]. Mill Valley, CA: Psychotherapy.net.

     

    Note:
    The approximate length of this media piece is 69 minutes. You will access this video through the Walden Library databases.

    Ashwood, D. (Producer). (n.d.-b).
    Mindfulness-based relapse prevention for addictions: Volume II
    [Video file]. Mill Valley, CA: Psycotherapy.net.

     

    Note:
    The approximate length of this media piece is 126 minutes. You will access this video through the Walden Library databases. Clinical Supervision – Kaltura, Certification Plan, Safe Prescribing and Decision Tree

    Optional Resources

    Gabbard, G. O. (2014).
    Gabbard’s treatment of psychiatric disorders
    (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publications.

    Chapter 46, “Alcohol-Related Disorders”

    Chapter 47, “Sedative-, Hypnotic-, or Anxiolytic-Related Disorders”

    Chapter 48, “Opioid-Related Disorders: Opioid Detoxification”

    Chapter 49, “Opioid-Related Disorders: Antagonist Treatment”

    Chapter 50, “Opioid-Related Disorders: Agonist Maintenance Treatment”

    Chapter 51, “Hallucinogen-Related Disorders

    Chapter 52, “Cannabis-Related Disorders”

    Chapter 53, “Club Drug Addiction”

    Chapter 54, “Stimulant-Related Disorders”

    Chapter 55, “Nicotine-Related Disorders”

    Chapter 56, “Individual Therapy for Substance Use Disorders”

    Chapter 57, “Cognitive, Behavioral, and Motivational Therapies for Substance Use Disorders”

    Chapter 58, “Group Therapy for Substance Use Disorders”

    Chapter 59, “Family Therapy in Substance Abuse Treatment”

    Chapter 60, “Network Therapy for Substance Use Disorders”

    Chapter 61, “Pain and Addiction”

    Chapter 62, “Gambling Disorder”

    Note:
    You will access this textbook from the Walden Library databases.

    Bechtold, J., Simpson, T., White, H. R., & Pardini, D. (2015). Chronic adolescent marijuana use as a risk factor for physical and mental health problems in young adult men. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 29(3), 552–563. doi:10.1037/adb0000103. Clinical Supervision – Kaltura, Certification Plan, Safe Prescribing and Decision Tree

    Note:
    You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

    Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). (2013b).
    TIP 48: Managing depressive symptoms in substance abuse clients during early recovery
    . Retrieved from http://store.samhsa.gov/product/TIP-48-Managing-Depressive-Symptoms-in-Substance-Abuse-Clients-During-Early-Recovery/SMA13-4353

    Note:
    This document is available as free download.

    Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). (2013b).
    TIP 42: Substance abuse treatment for persons with co-occurring disorders
    . Retrieved from http://store.samhsa.gov/product/TIP-42-Substance-Abuse-Treatment-for-Persons-With-Co-Occurring-Disorders/SMA13-3992

    Note:
    This document is available as free download.

    Borchardt, D. (2017).
    National Academy of Sciences pushes for rescheduling of marijuana. Forbes
    . Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/debraborchardt/2017/01/18/national-academy-of-sciences-suggests-removing-barriers-to-cannabis-research-basically-deschedule/#22269c753f76. Clinical Supervision – Kaltura, Certification Plan, Safe Prescribing and Decision Tree

    Discussion: Clinical Supervision – Kaltura

    Substance use disorders are complicated psychiatric and medical conditions that involve physical addiction as well as psychological or emotional dependence. Substance use disorders are some of the most difficult to treat. It takes a great deal of patience on the part of the provider and the client. It may take several attempts before a client is successfully able to “kick the habit.” Your guidance and patience can help the client to persevere through difficult times during the journey to recovery.

    Clinical Supervision is an essential component of your development as a psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner. It provides an opportunity for professional collaboration as you share experiences with and gain insights from colleagues. For this Clinical Supervision, consider a client with a substance abuse disorder whom you do not think is adequately progressing according to expected clinical outcomes. Clinical Supervision – Kaltura, Certification Plan, Safe Prescribing and Decision Tree

    Learning Objectives

    Students will:

    Analyze clients presenting for treatment of substance-related and addictive disorders

    Evaluate effectiveness of therapeutic approaches for clients diagnosed with substance-related and addictive disorders

    Recommend treatment plans

    Note:
    For this Discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the “Post to Discussion Question” link and then select “Create Thread” to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click submit, you cannot delete or edit your own posts, and cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking
    Submit
    !

    To prepare for this Discussion:

    Review this week’s Learning Resources concerning treating patients with substance-related and addictive disorders.

    Reflect on a client you are currently counseling or have previously counseled at your practicum site who has been diagnosed with substance-related and addictive disorders. Clinical Supervision – Kaltura, Certification Plan, Safe Prescribing and Decision Tree

    By Day 3

    Post
    a 3- to 5-minute Kaltura video in which you do the following:

    Describe the client. Note: Do not use the client’s actual name.

    Explain your therapeutic approach with the client, including the perceived effectiveness of your approach.

    Identify any additional information about this client that may potentially impact expected outcomes.

    Provide specific recommendations for the client to help them in determining why they are not progressing and what your suggested treatment plan consists of. It is useful to consult the Prochaska and DiClement model.

    Note:
    Nurse practitioners must have strong oral communication skills. This Discussion is designed to help you hone these skills. When filming your Kaltura video, be sure to dress and speak in a professional manner.

    View
    a selection of your colleagues’ responses.

    By Day 6

    Respond
    to at least
    two
    of your colleagues by suggesting an alternate therapeutic approach. Support your feedback with evidence-based literature and/or your own experiences with clients. Clinical Supervision – Kaltura, Certification Plan, Safe Prescribing and Decision Tree

    Submission and Grading Information

    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Week 4 Discussion Rubric

    Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6

    To participate in this Discussion:

    Week 4 Discussion

    Assignment 1: Week 1 Practicum Journal Entry: Certification Plan

    By Day 7

    Submit
    your Assignment. Refer to Week 1 for additional guidance.

    Submission and Grading Information

    To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

    Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK4Assgn1+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.

    Click the
    Week 4 Assignment 1 Rubric
    to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.

    Click the
    Week 4 Assignment 1
    link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.

    Next, from the Attach File area, click on the
    Browse My Computer
    button. Find the document you saved as “WK4Assgn1+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click
    Open
    .

    If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for
    I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database
    .

    Click on the
    Submit
    button to complete your submission. Clinical Supervision – Kaltura, Certification Plan, Safe Prescribing and Decision Tree

    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Week 4 Assignment 1 Rubric

    Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

    To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

    Submit your Week 4 Assignment 1 draft and review the originality report.

    Submit Your Assignment by Day 7

    To submit your Assignment:

    Week 4 Assignment 1

    Assignment 2: Week 2 Practicum Journal: Safe Prescribing

    By Day 7

    Submit
    your Assignment. Refer to Week 2 for additional guidance. Clinical Supervision – Kaltura, Certification Plan, Safe Prescribing and Decision Tree

    Submission and Grading Information

    To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

    Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK4Assgn2+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.

    Click the
    Week 4 Assignment 2 Rubric
    to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.

    Click the
    Week 4 Assignment 2
    link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.

    Next, from the Attach File area, click on the
    Browse My Computer
    button. Find the document you saved as “WK4Assgn2+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click
    Open
    .

    If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for
    I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database
    .

    Click on the
    Submit
    button to complete your submission.

    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Week 4 Assignment 2 Rubric

    Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

    To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

    Submit your Week 4 Assignment 2 draft and review the originality report.

    Submit Your Assignment by Day 7

    To submit your Assignment:

    Week 4 Assignment 2

    Assignment 3: Week 3 Practicum Journal: Decision Tree

    By Day 7

    Submit
    your Assignment. Refer to Week 3 for additional guidance.

    Submission and Grading Information

    To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

    Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK4Assgn3+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.

    Click the
    Week 4 Assignment 3 Rubric
    to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.

    Click the
    Week 4 Assignment 3
    link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.

    Next, from the Attach File area, click on the
    Browse My Computer
    button. Find the document you saved as “WK4Assgn3+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click
    Open
    . Clinical Supervision – Kaltura, Certification Plan, Safe Prescribing and Decision Tree

    If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for
    I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database
    .

    Click on the
    Submit
    button to complete your submission.

    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Week 4 Assignment 3 Rubric

    Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

    To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

    Submit your Week 4 Assignment 3 draft and review the originality report.

    Submit Your Assignment by Day 7

    To submit your Assignment:

    Week 4 Assignment 3

    Assignment 4: Board Vitals

    This week you will be responding to twenty Board Vitals questions that cover a broad review of your Nurse Practitioner program courses up to this point.

    These review questions will provide practice that is critical in your preparation for the national certification exam that’s required to certify you to practice as a nurse practitioner. These customized test questions are designed to help you prepare for your Nurse Practitioner certification exam. It is in your best interest to take your time, do your best, and answer each question to the best of your ability. Clinical Supervision – Kaltura, Certification Plan, Safe Prescribing and Decision Tree

    You can access Board Vitals through the link sent to you in email or by following the link below:

    https://www.boardvitals.com/

    By Day 7

    Complete the Board Vitals questions.

    Practicum Reminder

    Time Logs:
    You are required to keep a log of the time you spend related to your practicum experience
    and enter every patient you see each day
    . You can access your time log from the Welcome Page in your Meditrek account. You will track time individually for each patient you work with. Please make sure to continuously input your hours throughout the term. Clinical Supervision – Kaltura, Certification Plan, Safe Prescribing and Decision Tree

    Making Connections

    This week, you analyzed clients presenting for treatment of substance-related and addictive disorders and evaluated effectiveness of therapeutic approaches for clients diagnosed with substance-related and addictive disorders.

    Next week, you will, once again, become “captain of the ship” as you take full responsibility for a client with a bipolar disorder by recommending psychopharmacologic treatment and psychotherapy, identifying medical management needs and community support, and recommending follow-up plans. You will use the decision tree format to justify your rationale for diagnosis, pharmacological treatment, and psychotherapy of a patient with a mental illness. You also will evaluate the results of your Fitzgerald University Exit Comprehensive Exam and, based on those results, develop a plan of action to prepare for the certification exam. Clinical Supervision – Kaltura, Certification Plan, Safe Prescribing and Decision Tree

    NURS_6670_Week4_Discussion_Rubric

    Grid View

    List View

    Outstanding Performance

    Excellent Performance

    Competent Performance

    Proficient Performance

    Room for Improvement

    Main Posting: Response to the discusion question is reflecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

    Points Range:
    44
    (44%)
    – 44
    (44%)

    * Thoroughly responds to the discussion question(s) *is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. * supported by at least 3 current, credible sources

    Points Range:
    40
    (40%)
    – 43
    (43%)

    * Responds to the discussion question(s) *is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. * 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth * supported by at least 3 credible references

    Points Range:
    35
    (35%)
    – 39
    (39%)

    * Responds to most of the discussion question(s) *is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. * 50% of post has exceptional depth and breadth * supported by at least 3 credible references

    Points Range:
    31
    (31%)
    – 34
    (34%)

    * Responds to some of the discussion question(s) * one to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed *is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis *somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. * post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 30
    (30%)

    * Does not respond to the discussion question(s) * lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria *lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis *does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. * contains only 1 or no credible references

    Main Posting: Writing

    Points Range:
    6
    (6%)
    – 6
    (6%)

    * Written clearly and concisely * Contains no grammatical or spelling errors * Fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style

    Points Range:
    5.5
    (5.5%)
    – 5.5
    (5.5%)

    * Written clearly and concisely * May contain one or no grammatical or spelling error * Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style

    Points Range:
    5
    (5%)
    – 5
    (5%)

    * Written concisely * May contain one to two grammatical or spelling error * Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style

    Points Range:
    4.5
    (4.5%)
    – 4.5
    (4.5%)

    *Written somewhat concisely * May contain more than two2 spelling or grammatical errors * Contains some APA formatting errors

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 4
    (4%)

    * Not written clearly or concisely * Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors * Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style

    Main Posting: Timely and full participation

    Points Range:
    10
    (10%)
    – 10
    (10%)

    * meets requirements for timely and full participation * posts main discussion by due date

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 0
    (0%)

    NA

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 0
    (0%)

    NA

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 0
    (0%)

    NA

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 0
    (0%)

    * does not meet requirement for full participation

    First Reponse

    Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.

    Points Range:
    9
    (9%)
    – 9
    (9%)

    * response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings * responds to questions posed by faculty * the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives

    Points Range:
    8.5
    (8.5%)
    – 8.5
    (8.5%)

    * response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings

    Points Range:
    7.5
    (7.5%)
    – 8
    (8%)

    * response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting

    Points Range:
    6.5
    (6.5%)
    – 7
    (7%)

    * response is on topic, may have some depth. Clinical Supervision – Kaltura, Certification Plan, Safe Prescribing and Decision Tree

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 6
    (6%)

    * response may not be on topic, lacks depth

    First Reponse: Writing

    Points Range:
    6
    (6%)
    – 6
    (6%)

    * Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed * Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources * Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

    Points Range:
    5.5
    (5.5%)
    – 5.5
    (5.5%)

    * Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are answered if posed * Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources * Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

    Points Range:
    5
    (5%)
    – 5
    (5%)

    * Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed * Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources * Response is written in Standard Edited English

    Points Range:
    4.5
    (4.5%)
    – 4.5
    (4.5%)

    * Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication * Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed * Few or no credible sources are cited

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 4
    (4%)

    * Responses posted in the discussion lack effective * Response to faculty questions are missing * No credible sources are cited

    First Reponse: Timely and full participation

    Points Range:
    5
    (5%)
    – 5
    (5%)

    * meets requirements for timely and full participation * posts by due date

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 0
    (0%)

    NA

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 0
    (0%)

    NA

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 0
    (0%)

    NA

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 0
    (0%)

    * does not meet requirement for full participation

    Second Reponse: Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.

    Points Range:
    9
    (9%)
    – 9
    (9%)

    * response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings * responds to questions posed by faculty * the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives

    Points Range:
    8.5
    (8.5%)
    – 8.5
    (8.5%)

    * response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings

    Points Range:
    7.5
    (7.5%)
    – 8
    (8%)

    * response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting

    Points Range:
    6.5
    (6.5%)
    – 7
    (7%)

    * response is on topic, may have some depth

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 6
    (6%)

    * response may not be on topic, lacks depth

    Second Reponse: Writing

    Points Range:
    6
    (6%)
    – 6
    (6%)

    * Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed * Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources * Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

    Points Range:
    5.5
    (5.5%)
    – 5.5
    (5.5%)

    * Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are answered if posed * Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources * Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

    Points Range:
    5
    (5%)
    – 5
    (5%)

    * Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed * Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources * Response is written in Standard Edited English

    Points Range:
    4.5
    (4.5%)
    – 4.5
    (4.5%)

    * Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication * Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed * Few or no credible sources are cited

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 4
    (4%)

    * Responses posted in the discussion lack effective * Response to faculty questions are missing * No credible sources are cited. Clinical Supervision – Kaltura, Certification Plan, Safe Prescribing and Decision Tree

    Second Reponse: Timely and full participation

    Points Range:
    5
    (5%)
    – 5
    (5%)

    * meets requirements for timely and full participation * posts by due date

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 0
    (0%)

    NA

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 0
    (0%)

    NA

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 0
    (0%)

    NA

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 0
    (0%)

    * does not meet requirement for full participation

    NURS_6670_Week4_S/U_Assignment1_Rubric

    Grid View

    List View

    Satisfactory

    Unsatisfactory

    Quality of Work Submitted: The extent of which work meets the assignned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking.

    Points Range:
    26
    (26%)
    – 30
    (30%)

    Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing good breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics.

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 25
    (25%)

    Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not addressed or inadequately addressed.

    Quality of Work Submitted: The purpose of the paper is clear.

    Points Range:
    4
    (4%)
    – 5
    (5%)

    Purpose of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 3
    (3%)

    No purpose statement was provided.

    Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:

    Understand and interpret the assignment’s key concepts.

    Points Range:
    8
    (8%)
    – 10
    (10%)

    Demonstrates a clear understanding of key concepts.

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 7
    (7%)

    Shows a lack of understanding of key concepts, deviates from topics.

    Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:

    Apply and integrate material in course rsources (i.e. video, required readings, and textook) and credible outside resources.

    Points Range:
    16
    (16%)
    – 20
    (20%)

    Integrates specific information from 1 credible outside resource and 2-3 course resources to support major points and point of view. Clinical Supervision – Kaltura, Certification Plan, Safe Prescribing and Decision Tree

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 15
    (15%)

    Includes and integrates specific information from 0 to 1 resoruce to support major points and point of view.

    Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:

    Synthesize (combines various components or different ideas into a new whole) material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, textbook) and outside, credible resources by comparing different points of view and highlighting similarities, differences, and connections.

    Points Range:
    16
    (16%)
    – 20
    (20%)

    Summarizes information gleaned from sources to support major points, but does not synthesize.

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 15
    (15%)

    Rarely or does not interpret, apply, and synthesize concepts, and/or strategies.

    Written Expression and Formatting

    Paragraph and Sentence Structure: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are clearly structured and carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.

    Points Range:
    4
    (4%)
    – 5
    (5%)

    Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 80% of the time.

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 3
    (3%)

    Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity < 60% of the time. Clinical Supervision – Kaltura, Certification Plan, Safe Prescribing and Decision Tree Written Expression and Formatting English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation Points Range: 3 (3%) – 5 (5%) Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Written Expression and Formatting The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. Points Range: 3 (3%) – 5 (5%) Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%) Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. NURS_6670_Week4_S/U_Assignment2_Rubric Grid View List View Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Quality of Work Submitted: The extent of which work meets the assignned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking. Points Range: 26 (26%) – 30 (30%) Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing good breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 25 (25%) Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not addressed or inadequately addressed. Quality of Work Submitted: The purpose of the paper is clear. Points Range: 4 (4%) – 5 (5%) Purpose of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) No purpose statement was provided. Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to: Understand and interpret the assignment’s key concepts. Points Range: 8 (8%) – 10 (10%) Demonstrates a clear understanding of key concepts. Clinical Supervision – Kaltura, Certification Plan, Safe Prescribing and Decision Tree Points Range: 0 (0%) – 7 (7%) Shows a lack of understanding of key concepts, deviates from topics. Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to: Apply and integrate material in course rsources (i.e. video, required readings, and textook) and credible outside resources. Points Range: 16 (16%) – 20 (20%) Integrates specific information from 1 credible outside resource and 2-3 course resources to support major points and point of view. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 15 (15%) Includes and integrates specific information from 0 to 1 resoruce to support major points and point of view. Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to: Synthesize (combines various components or different ideas into a new whole) material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, textbook) and outside, credible resources by comparing different points of view and highlighting similarities, differences, and connections. Points Range: 16 (16%) – 20 (20%) Summarizes information gleaned from sources to support major points, but does not synthesize. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 15 (15%) Rarely or does not interpret, apply, and synthesize concepts, and/or strategies. Clinical Supervision – Kaltura, Certification Plan, Safe Prescribing and Decision Tree Written Expression and Formatting Paragraph and Sentence Structure: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are clearly structured and carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. Points Range: 4 (4%) – 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 80% of the time. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity < 60% of the time. Written Expression and Formatting English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation Points Range: 3 (3%) – 5 (5%) Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Written Expression and Formatting The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. Points Range: 3 (3%) – 5 (5%) Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%) Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. NURS_6670_Week4_S/U_Assignment3_Rubric Grid View List View Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Quality of Work Submitted: The extent of which work meets the assignned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking. Points Range: 26 (26%) – 30 (30%) Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing good breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 25 (25%) Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not addressed or inadequately addressed. Quality of Work Submitted: The purpose of the paper is clear. Points Range: 4 (4%) – 5 (5%) Purpose of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) No purpose statement was provided. Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to: Understand and interpret the assignment’s key concepts. Points Range: 8 (8%) – 10 (10%) Demonstrates a clear understanding of key concepts. Clinical Supervision – Kaltura, Certification Plan, Safe Prescribing and Decision Tree Points Range: 0 (0%) – 7 (7%) Shows a lack of understanding of key concepts, deviates from topics. Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to: Apply and integrate material in course rsources (i.e. video, required readings, and textook) and credible outside resources. Points Range: 16 (16%) – 20 (20%) Integrates specific information from 1 credible outside resource and 2-3 course resources to support major points and point of view. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 15 (15%) Includes and integrates specific information from 0 to 1 resoruce to support major points and point of view. Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to: Synthesize (combines various components or different ideas into a new whole) material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, textbook) and outside, credible resources by comparing different points of view and highlighting similarities, differences, and connections. Points Range: 16 (16%) – 20 (20%) Summarizes information gleaned from sources to support major points, but does not synthesize. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 15 (15%) Rarely or does not interpret, apply, and synthesize concepts, and/or strategies. Clinical Supervision – Kaltura, Certification Plan, Safe Prescribing and Decision Tree Written Expression and Formatting Paragraph and Sentence Structure: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are clearly structured and carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. Points Range: 4 (4%) – 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 80% of the time. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity < 60% of the time. Written Expression and Formatting English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation Points Range: 3 (3%) – 5 (5%) Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Written Expression and Formatting The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. Points Range: 3 (3%) – 5 (5%) Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%) Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. Clinical Supervision – Kaltura, Certification Plan, Safe Prescribing and Decision Tree

  • Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders

    Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders

    Week 4: Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders

    I can’t believe that stupid horse lost! My inside man told me it was a sure bet at 20:1 odds. I thought for sure that I would be able to make back the money I lost yesterday. What am I going to tell my wife? That was the money for the mortgage payment…well, the last three mortgage payments. She does not know I have been spending my days at the track. I lost my job at the company because a few hundred dollars went missing. I just need a break. I know this next horse will be my winner! Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders.

    Michael, age 37

    Substance abuse and addiction affects persons in all walks of life; every ethnic and economic group is affected in some way by addiction or substance abuse. In your practice as a PMHNP, you will encounter patients with substance abuse and dependence. Some of the people who present for treatment are at a low point in their lives and want to turn things around. They may present for other conditions such as depression or bipolar disorder, anxiety, PTSD, or personality disorders. One of the most common ways of self-medicating a mental illness is with alcohol and illicit drugs. Marijuana is a common substance used by clients to treat various symptoms. To effectively treat clients with addictive disorders and substance use disorders, the provider needs to examine their own values and thoughts about the use of substances. Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders.

    This week, you will analyze clients presenting for treatment of substance-related and addictive disorders and evaluate effectiveness of therapeutic approaches for clients diagnosed with substance-related and addictive disorders.

    ORDER A CUSTOM-WRITTEN PAPER NOW

    Learning Resources

    Note:
    To access this week’s required library resources, please click on the link to the Course Readings List, found in the
    Course Materials
    section of your Syllabus. Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders.

    Required Readings

    Sadock, B. J., Sadock, V. A., & Ruiz, P. (2014).
    Kaplan & Sadock’s synopsis of psychiatry: Behavioral sciences/clinical psychiatry
    (11th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.

    Chapter 20, “Substance Use and Addictive Disorders” (pp. 616–693)

    American Psychiatric Association. (2013).
    Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders
    (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

    Note:
    You will access this book from the Walden Library databases.

    Stahl, S. M. (2014).
    Prescriber’s Guide: Stahl’s Essential Psychopharmacology
    (5th ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders.

     

    Note:
    All Stahl resources can be accessed through the Walden Library using the link below. This link will take you to a login page for the Walden Library. Once you log in to the library, the Stahl website will appear. http://ezp.waldenulibrary.org/login?url=http://stahlonline.cambridge.org/

     

    To access information on specific medications, click on
    The Prescriber’s Guide, 5th Ed
    . tab on the Stahl Online website and select the appropriate medication. Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders.

    Alcohol abstinence

    Alcohol dependence

    Alcohol withdrawal

    Nicotine addiction

    Opioid dependence

    Reversal of benzodiazepine effects

    acamprosate

    disulfiram

    nalmefene

    naltrexone

    chlordiazepoxide

    clonidine

    clorazepate

    diazepam

    lorazepam

    oxazepam

    bupropin

    varenicline

    buprenorphine

    naltrexone

    flumazenil

    Note:
    For more information about buprenorphine, see https: //www.samhsa.gov/medication-assisted-treatment/qualify-nps-pas-waivers

    Required Media

    Ashwood, D. (Producer). (n.d.-a).
    Mindfulness-based relapse prevention for addictions: Volume I
    [Video file]. Mill Valley, CA: Psychotherapy.net. Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders.

     

    Note:
    The approximate length of this media piece is 69 minutes. You will access this video through the Walden Library databases.

    Ashwood, D. (Producer). (n.d.-b).
    Mindfulness-based relapse prevention for addictions: Volume II
    [Video file]. Mill Valley, CA: Psycotherapy.net.

     

    Note:
    The approximate length of this media piece is 126 minutes. You will access this video through the Walden Library databases.

    Optional Resources

    Gabbard, G. O. (2014).
    Gabbard’s treatment of psychiatric disorders
    (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publications.

    Chapter 46, “Alcohol-Related Disorders”

    Chapter 47, “Sedative-, Hypnotic-, or Anxiolytic-Related Disorders”

    Chapter 48, “Opioid-Related Disorders: Opioid Detoxification”

    Chapter 49, “Opioid-Related Disorders: Antagonist Treatment”

    Chapter 50, “Opioid-Related Disorders: Agonist Maintenance Treatment”

    Chapter 51, “Hallucinogen-Related Disorders

    Chapter 52, “Cannabis-Related Disorders”

    Chapter 53, “Club Drug Addiction”

    Chapter 54, “Stimulant-Related Disorders”

    Chapter 55, “Nicotine-Related Disorders”

    Chapter 56, “Individual Therapy for Substance Use Disorders”

    Chapter 57, “Cognitive, Behavioral, and Motivational Therapies for Substance Use Disorders”

    Chapter 58, “Group Therapy for Substance Use Disorders”

    Chapter 59, “Family Therapy in Substance Abuse Treatment”

    Chapter 60, “Network Therapy for Substance Use Disorders”

    Chapter 61, “Pain and Addiction”

    Chapter 62, “Gambling Disorder”

    Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders

    Note:
    You will access this textbook from the Walden Library databases.

    Bechtold, J., Simpson, T., White, H. R., & Pardini, D. (2015). Chronic adolescent marijuana use as a risk factor for physical and mental health problems in young adult men. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 29(3), 552–563. doi:10.1037/adb0000103

    Note:
    You will access this article from the Walden Library databases. Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders.

    Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). (2013b).
    TIP 48: Managing depressive symptoms in substance abuse clients during early recovery
    . Retrieved from http://store.samhsa.gov/product/TIP-48-Managing-Depressive-Symptoms-in-Substance-Abuse-Clients-During-Early-Recovery/SMA13-4353

    Note:
    This document is available as free download.

    Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). (2013b).
    TIP 42: Substance abuse treatment for persons with co-occurring disorders
    . Retrieved from http://store.samhsa.gov/product/TIP-42-Substance-Abuse-Treatment-for-Persons-With-Co-Occurring-Disorders/SMA13-3992

    Note:
    This document is available as free download.

    Borchardt, D. (2017).
    National Academy of Sciences pushes for rescheduling of marijuana. Forbes
    . Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/debraborchardt/2017/01/18/national-academy-of-sciences-suggests-removing-barriers-to-cannabis-research-basically-deschedule/#22269c753f76

    Discussion: Clinical Supervision – Kaltura

    Substance use disorders are complicated psychiatric and medical conditions that involve physical addiction as well as psychological or emotional dependence. Substance use disorders are some of the most difficult to treat. It takes a great deal of patience on the part of the provider and the client. It may take several attempts before a client is successfully able to “kick the habit.” Your guidance and patience can help the client to persevere through difficult times during the journey to recovery. Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders.

    Clinical Supervision is an essential component of your development as a psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner. It provides an opportunity for professional collaboration as you share experiences with and gain insights from colleagues. For this Clinical Supervision, consider a client with a substance abuse disorder whom you do not think is adequately progressing according to expected clinical outcomes. Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders.

    Learning Objectives

    Students will:

    Analyze clients presenting for treatment of substance-related and addictive disorders

    Evaluate effectiveness of therapeutic approaches for clients diagnosed with substance-related and addictive disorders

    Recommend treatment plans

    Note:
    For this Discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the “Post to Discussion Question” link and then select “Create Thread” to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click submit, you cannot delete or edit your own posts, and cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking
    Submit
    !

    To prepare for this Discussion:

    Review this week’s Learning Resources concerning treating patients with substance-related and addictive disorders.

    Reflect on a client you are currently counseling or have previously counseled at your practicum site who has been diagnosed with substance-related and addictive disorders. Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders.

    By Day 3

    Post
    a 3- to 5-minute Kaltura video in which you do the following:

    Describe the client. Note: Do not use the client’s actual name.

    Explain your therapeutic approach with the client, including the perceived effectiveness of your approach.

    Identify any additional information about this client that may potentially impact expected outcomes.

    Provide specific recommendations for the client to help them in determining why they are not progressing and what your suggested treatment plan consists of. It is useful to consult the Prochaska and DiClement model.

    Note:
    Nurse practitioners must have strong oral communication skills. This Discussion is designed to help you hone these skills. When filming your Kaltura video, be sure to dress and speak in a professional manner.

    View
    a selection of your colleagues’ responses.

    By Day 6

    Respond
    to at least
    two
    of your colleagues by suggesting an alternate therapeutic approach. Support your feedback with evidence-based literature and/or your own experiences with clients. Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders.

    Submission and Grading Information

    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Week 4 Discussion Rubric

    Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6

    To participate in this Discussion:

    Week 4 Discussion

    Assignment 1: Week 1 Practicum Journal Entry: Certification Plan

    By Day 7

    Submit
    your Assignment. Refer to Week 1 for additional guidance.

    Submission and Grading Information

    To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

    Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK4Assgn1+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.

    Click the
    Week 4 Assignment 1 Rubric
    to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment. Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders.

    Click the
    Week 4 Assignment 1
    link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.

    Next, from the Attach File area, click on the
    Browse My Computer
    button. Find the document you saved as “WK4Assgn1+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click
    Open
    . Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders.

    If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for
    I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database
    .

    Click on the
    Submit
    button to complete your submission. Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders.

    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Week 4 Assignment 1 Rubric

    Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

    To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

    Submit your Week 4 Assignment 1 draft and review the originality report.

    Submit Your Assignment by Day 7

    To submit your Assignment:

    Week 4 Assignment 1

    Assignment 2: Week 2 Practicum Journal: Safe Prescribing

    By Day 7

    Submit
    your Assignment. Refer to Week 2 for additional guidance.

    Submission and Grading Information

    To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

    Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK4Assgn2+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.

    Click the
    Week 4 Assignment 2 Rubric
    to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.

    Click the
    Week 4 Assignment 2
    link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area. Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders.

    Next, from the Attach File area, click on the
    Browse My Computer
    button. Find the document you saved as “WK4Assgn2+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click
    Open
    .

    If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for
    I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database
    .

    Click on the
    Submit
    button to complete your submission. Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders.

    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Week 4 Assignment 2 Rubric

    Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

    To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

    Submit your Week 4 Assignment 2 draft and review the originality report.

    Submit Your Assignment by Day 7

    To submit your Assignment:

    Week 4 Assignment 2

    Assignment 3: Week 3 Practicum Journal: Decision Tree

    By Day 7

    Submit
    your Assignment. Refer to Week 3 for additional guidance.

    Submission and Grading Information

    To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

    Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK4Assgn3+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.

    Click the
    Week 4 Assignment 3 Rubric
    to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.

    Click the
    Week 4 Assignment 3
    link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area. Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders.

    Next, from the Attach File area, click on the
    Browse My Computer
    button. Find the document you saved as “WK4Assgn3+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click
    Open
    .

    If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for
    I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database
    .

    Click on the
    Submit
    button to complete your submission.

    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Week 4 Assignment 3 Rubric

    Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

    To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

    Submit your Week 4 Assignment 3 draft and review the originality report.

    Submit Your Assignment by Day 7

    To submit your Assignment:

    Week 4 Assignment 3

    Assignment 4: Board Vitals

    This week you will be responding to twenty Board Vitals questions that cover a broad review of your Nurse Practitioner program courses up to this point.

    These review questions will provide practice that is critical in your preparation for the national certification exam that’s required to certify you to practice as a nurse practitioner. These customized test questions are designed to help you prepare for your Nurse Practitioner certification exam. It is in your best interest to take your time, do your best, and answer each question to the best of your ability. Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders.

    You can access Board Vitals through the link sent to you in email or by following the link below:

    https://www.boardvitals.com/

    By Day 7

    Complete the Board Vitals questions.

    Practicum Reminder

    Time Logs:
    You are required to keep a log of the time you spend related to your practicum experience
    and enter every patient you see each day
    . You can access your time log from the Welcome Page in your Meditrek account. You will track time individually for each patient you work with. Please make sure to continuously input your hours throughout the term. Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders.

    Making Connections

    This week, you analyzed clients presenting for treatment of substance-related and addictive disorders and evaluated effectiveness of therapeutic approaches for clients diagnosed with substance-related and addictive disorders. Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders.

    Next week, you will, once again, become “captain of the ship” as you take full responsibility for a client with a bipolar disorder by recommending psychopharmacologic treatment and psychotherapy, identifying medical management needs and community support, and recommending follow-up plans. You will use the decision tree format to justify your rationale for diagnosis, pharmacological treatment, and psychotherapy of a patient with a mental illness. You also will evaluate the results of your Fitzgerald University Exit Comprehensive Exam and, based on those results, develop a plan of action to prepare for the certification exam. Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders.

  • Bipolar Disorders essay assignment papers

    Bipolar Disorders essay assignment papers

    Week 5: Bipolar Disorders

    I am finally doing everything right. I stayed up all night studying for my final exams and even managed to clean out my closet and order a whole new bedroom from the Internet. I know I will ace all my exams. Nothing can go wrong like they did a few months ago. I was so low and was sleeping all the time. I did not think I would ever be happy again, but now I know I can do anything. Bipolar Disorders essay assignment papers.

    Jessica, age 22

    Bipolar disorder is relatively rare with around only 3% of the population diagnosed with one of them. Although being relatively rare in terms of lifetime prevalence, bipolar disorder is burdensome to the individual and health care system because of its early onset, severity, and chronic nature. The average age of onset is around 25 and affects men and women equally. The importance of evidence-based intervention for treatment in persons with bipolar disorder cannot be underestimated. Unstable mood can result in repeat chronic hospitalizations. Developing a good rapport and relationship with the client can make a difference in the course, symptom management, and stability of the person with bipolar disorder.

    This week, you will once again become “cCaptain of the Sship” as you take full responsibility for a client with a bipolar disorder by recommending psychopharmacologic treatment and psychotherapy, identifying medical management needs and community support, and recommending follow-up plans. You will use the decision tree format to justify your rationale for diagnosis, pharmacological treatment, and psychotherapy of a patient with a mental illness. You also will evaluate the results of your Fitzgerald University Exit Comprehensive Exam and, based on those results, develop a plan of action to prepare for the certification exam.

    ORDER A CUSTOM-WRITTEN PAPER NOW

    Learning Resources

    Required Readings

    Sadock, B. J., Sadock, V. A., & Ruiz, P. (2014).
    Kaplan & Sadock’s synopsis of psychiatry: Behavioral sciences/clinical psychiatry
    (11th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer. Bipolar Disorders essay assignment papers.

    Chapter 8, “Mood Disorders” (pp. 347–386)

    Note:
    This is review from the Learning Resource in Week 2.

    Gabbard, G. O. (2014).
    Gabbard’s treatment of psychiatric disorders
    (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publications.

    Chapter 13, “Acute and Maintenance Treatment of Bipolar and Related Disorders”

    Note:
    You will access this textbook from the Walden Library databases.

    American Psychiatric Association. (2013).
    Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders
    (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author. Bipolar Disorders essay assignment papers.

    “Bipolar and Related Disorders”

    Note:
    You will access this book from the Walden Library databases.

    Stahl, S. M. (2014).
    Prescriber’s Guide: Stahl’s Essential Psychopharmacology
    (5th ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Bipolar Disorders essay assignment papers.

     

    Note:
    All Stahl resources can be accessed through the Walden Library using the link below. This link will take you to a login page for the Walden Library. Once you log in to the library, the Stahl website will appear. http://ezp.waldenulibrary.org/login?url=http://stahlonline.cambridge.org/

     

    To access information on specific medications, click on
    The Prescriber’s Guide, 5th Ed
    . tab on the Stahl Online website and select the appropriate medication. Bipolar Disorders essay assignment papers.

     

    Bipolar depression

    Bipolar disorder

    Bipolar maintenance

    Mania

    amoxapine

    aripiprazole

    armodafinil

    asenapine

    bupropion

    carbamazepine

    fluoxetine

    iloperidone

    lamotrigine

    lithium

    lurasidone

    modafinil

    olanzapine

    olanzapine-fluoxetine combination

    quetiapine

    risperidone

    sertindole

    valproate (divalproex)

    ziprasidone

    alprazolam (adjunct)

    amoxapine

    aripiprazole

    asenapine

    bupropion

    carbamazepine

    chlorpromazine

    clonazepam (adjunct)

    cyamemazine

    doxepin

    fluoxetine

    flupenthixol

    fluphenazine

    gabapentin (adjunct)

    haloperidol

    iloperidone

    lamotrigine

    levetiracetam

    lithium

    lorazepam (adjunct)

    loxapine

    lurasidone

    molindone

    olanzapine

    olanzapine-fluoxetine combination

    oxcarbazepine

    paliperidone

    perphenazine

    pipothiazine

    quetiapine

    risperidone

    sertindole

    thiothixene

    topiramate (adjunct)

    trifluoperazine

    valproate (divalproex)

    ziprasidone

    zonisamide

    zotepine

    zuclopenthixol

    aripiprazole

    asenapine

    carbamazepine

    iloperidone

    lamotrigine

    lithium

    lurasidone

    olanzapine

    olanzapine-fluoxetine combination

    quetiapine

    risperidone (injectable)

    sertindole

    valproate (divalproex)

    ziprasidone. Bipolar Disorders essay assignment papers.

    alprazolam (adjunct)

    aripiprazole

    asenapine

    carbamazepine

    chlorpromazine

    clonazepam (adjunct)

    iloperidone

    lamotrigine

    levetiracetam

    lithium

    lorazepam (adjunct)

    lurasidone

    olanzapine

    quetiapine

    risperidone

    sertindole

    valproate (divalproex)

    ziprasidone

    zotepine

    Marsee, K., & Gross, A. F. (2013). Bipolar disorder or something else?
    Current Psychiatry, 12
    (2), 43–49. Retrieved from http://www.mdedge.com/currentpsychiatry/article/66320/bipolar-disorder/bipolar-disorder-or-something-else

    Miller, L. J., Ghadiali, N. Y., Larusso, E. M., Wahlen, K. J., Avni-Barron, O., Mittal, L., & Greene, J. A. (2015). Bipolar disorder in women.
    Health Care for Women International, 36
    (4), 475–498. doi:10.1080/07399332.2014.962138. Bipolar Disorders essay assignment papers.

     

    Note:
    You will access this book from the Walden Library databases.

    Schouws, S. M., Comijs, H. C., Dols, A., Beekman, A. F., & Stek, M. L. (2016). Five-year follow-up of cognitive impairment in older adults with bipolar disorder.
    Bipolar Disorders, 18
    (2), 148–154. doi:10.1111/bdi.12374

    Ward, I. (2017). Pharmacologic options for bipolar disorder.
    Clinical Advisor, 20
    (3), 17–25. Bipolar Disorders essay assignment papers.

     

    Note:
    You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

    Required Media

    Laureate Education (Producer). (2017d).
    A young woman with depression
    [Multimedia file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Redfield Jamison, K. (Producer). (n.d.).
    Assessment & psychological treatment of bipolar disorder
    [Video file]. Mill Valley, CA: Psychotherapy.net. Bipolar Disorders essay assignment papers.

     

    Note:
    The approximate length of this media piece is 52 minutes.

     

    Note:
    You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

    Optional Resources

    Malhi, G. S., McAulay, C., Gershon, S., Gessler, D., Fritz, K., Das, P., & Outhred, T. (2016). The lithium battery: Assessing the neurocognitive profile of lithium in bipolar disorder.
    Bipolar Disorders, 18
    (2), 102–115. doi:10.1111/bdi.12375

    Samalin, L., de Chazeron, I., Vieta, E., Bellivier, F., & Llorca, P. (2016). Residual symptoms and specific functional impairments in euthymic patients with bipolar disorder.
    Bipolar Disorders, 18
    (2), 164–173. doi:10.1111/bdi.12376. Bipolar Disorders essay assignment papers.

    Assignment 1: “Captain of the Ship” Project – Bipolar Disorders

    Bipolar disorders are severe disorders of mood that include both depressive episodes and expansive, grandiose, or manic episodes. During these times, the person may engage in activities with little awareness of the consequences because of accompanying psychosis. A diagnosis of bipolar disorder includes periods of mania or hypomania and periods of depression where the mood is down, hopeless, and suicidal. The neurovegetative symptoms of bipolar depression can be incapacitating. It is also important to differentiate the psychosis of bipolar disorder from schizophrenia.

    In this Assignment, you will become the “captain of the ship” as you provide treatment recommendations and identify medical management, community support resources, and follow-up plans for a client with a bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disorders essay assignment papers.

    Learning Objectives

    Students will:

    Recommend psychopharmacologic treatments based on therapeutic end points for clients with bipolar disorders

    Recommend psychotherapy based on therapeutic end points for clients with bipolar disorders

    Identify medical management needs for clients with bipolar disorders

    Identify community support resources for clients with bipolar disorders

    Recommend follow-up plans for clients with bipolar disorders

    To prepare for this Assignment:

    Select an adult or older adult client with a bipolar disorder that you have seen in your practicum.

    In 3-4 pages, write a treatment plan for your client. In which you do the following:

    Describe the HPI and clinical impression for the client.

    Recommend psychopharmacologic treatments and describe specific and therapeutic end points for your psychopharmacologic agent. (This should relate to HPI and clinical impression.).

    Recommend psychotherapy choices (individual, family, and group) and specific therapeutic endpoints for your choices.

    Identify medical management needs, including primary care needs, specific to this client.

    Identify community support resources (housing, socioeconomic needs, etc.) and community agencies that are available to assist the client. Bipolar Disorders essay assignment papers.

    Recommend a plan for follow-up intensity and frequency and collaboration with other providers.

    By Day 7

    Submit
    your Assignment.

    Submission and Grading Information

    To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

    Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK5Assgn1+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.

    Click the
    Week 5 Assignment 1 Rubric
    to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.

    Click the
    Week 5 Assignment 1
    link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area. Bipolar Disorders essay assignment papers

    Next, from the Attach File area, click on the
    Browse My Computer
    button. Find the document you saved as “WK5Assgn1+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click
    Open
    .

    If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for
    I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database
    .

    Click on the
    Submit
    button to complete your submission.

    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Week 5 Assignment 1 Rubric

    Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

    To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

    Submit your Week 5 Assignment 1 draft and review the originality report.

    Submit Your Assignment by Day 7

    To submit your Assignment:

    Week 5 Assignment 1

    Assignment 2: FHEA Exam Follow-up

    In Week 3 you completed the Fitzgerald University Exit Comprehensive Exam and you should have received your results. This exam is an example of the certification exam you may be required to take in order to be licensed as a PMHNP in your state. Your results from the exam may reflect how you would do in the actual certification exam.

    In this Assignment, you will develop a plan of action to address any areas of the exam where you may have scored less than acceptable.

    Learning Objectives

    Students will:

    Develop plan of action for certification exam preparation

    To prepare for this Assignment:

    Develop plan of action for certification exam preparation

    In 1 page:

    Based on your results from the FHEA Exam, develop a plan of action, including an academic study plan, which will help you maintain your areas of strength and address the areas that need improvement, and help you prepare for the Certification Exam. Address each area of the exam including:

    Foundations of Advanced Practice Nursing

    Independent Practice Competencies

    Professional Role and Policy

    By Day 7

    Submit
    your Assignment.

    Submission and Grading Information

    To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

    Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK5Assgn2+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.

    Click the
    Week 5 Assignment 2 Rubric
    to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.

    Click the
    Week 5 Assignment 2
    link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.

    Next, from the Attach File area, click on the
    Browse My Computer
    button. Find the document you saved as “WK5Assgn2+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click
    Open
    .

    If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for
    I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database
    .

    Click on the
    Submit
    button to complete your submission.

    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Week 5 Assignment 2 Rubric

    Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

    To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

    Submit your Week 5 Assignment 2 draft and review the originality report.

    Submit Your Assignment by Day 7

    To submit your Assignment:

    Week 5 Assignment 2

    Bipolar Disorders essay assignment papers 3:

    Practicum: Decision Tree

    For this Assignment, as you examine the client case study in this week’s Learning Resources, consider how you might assess and treat adult and older adult clients presenting symptoms of a mental health disorder.

    Learning Objectives

    Students will:

    Evaluate clients for treatment of mental health disorders

    Analyze decisions made throughout diagnosis and treatment of clients with mental health disorders

    Examine Case 2:
    You will be asked to make three decisions concerning the diagnosis and treatment for this client. Be sure to consider co-morbid physical, as well as mental factors that might impact the client’s diagnosis and treatment.

    At each Decision Point stop to complete the following:

    Decision #1: Differential Diagnosis

    Which Decision did you select?

    Why did you select this Decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.

    What were you hoping to achieve by making this Decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.

    Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with Decision #1 and the results of the Decision. Why were they different? Bipolar Disorders essay assignment papers.

    Decision #2: Treatment Plan for Psychotherapy

    Why did you select this Decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.

    What were you hoping to achieve by making this Decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.

    Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with Decision #2 and the results of the Decision. Why were they different? Bipolar Disorders essay assignment papers.

    Decision #3: Treatment Plan for Psychopharmacology

    Why did you select this Decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.

    What were you hoping to achieve by making this Decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.

    Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with Decision #3 and the results of the decision. Why were they different? Bipolar Disorders essay assignment papers.

    Also include how ethical considerations might impact your treatment plan and communication with clients and their family.

    Note:
    Support your rationale with a minimum of three academic resources. While you may use the course text to support your rationale, it will not count toward the resource requirement.

    By Day 7 of Week 7

    Submit
    your Assignment.

    Our experienced nursing essay writers will handle all your writing needs including

    Our experienced nursing essay writers will handle all your writing needs including

    Bipolar Disorders essay assignment papers 4: Board Vitals

    This week you will be responding to twenty Board Vitals questions that cover a broad review of your Nurse Practitioner program courses up to this point. Bipolar Disorders essay assignment papers.

    These review questions will provide practice that is critical in your preparation for the national certification exam that’s required to certify you to practice as a nurse practitioner. These customized test questions are designed to help you prepare for your Nurse Practitioner certification exam. It is in your best interest to take your time, do your best, and answer each question to the best of your ability.

    You can access Board Vitals through the link sent to you in email or by following the link below:

    https://www.boardvitals.com/

    By Day 7

    Complete the Board Vitals questions. Bipolar Disorders essay assignment papers.

    Making Connections

    This week, you once again became “captain of the ship” as you took full responsibility for a client with a bipolar disorder by recommending psychopharmacologic treatment and psychotherapy, identifying medical management needs, community support, and recommending follow-up plans. You used the decision tree format to justify your rationale for diagnosis, pharmacological treatment, and psychotherapy of a patient with a mental illness. You also evaluated the results of your Fitzgerald University Exit Comprehensive Exam and, based on those results, developed a plan of action to help you prepare for the certification exam. Bipolar Disorders essay assignment papers.

    Next week, you will explore evidence-based treatment methods for clients with anxiety disorders. You will complete a midterm exam and analyze reimbursement rates for treatment of mental health disorders.

    NURS_6670_Week5_Assignment1_Rubric

    Grid View

    List View

    Excellent

    Good

    Fair

    Poor

    Quality of Work Submitted: The extent of which work meets the assignned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking.

    Points Range:
    27
    (27%)
    – 30
    (30%)

    Assignment exceeds expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 75% containing exceptional breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics.

    Points Range:
    24
    (24%)
    – 26
    (26%)

    Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing good breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics.

    Points Range:
    21
    (21%)
    – 23
    (23%)

    Assignment meets most of the expectations. One required topic is either not addressed or inadequately addressed.

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 20
    (20%)

    Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not addressed or inadequately addressed.

    Quality of Work Submitted: The purpose of the paper is clear.

    Points Range:
    5
    (5%)
    – 5
    (5%)

    A clear and comprehensive purpose statement is provided which delineates all required criteria.

    Points Range:
    4
    (4%)
    – 4
    (4%)

    Purpose of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

    Points Range:
    3.5
    (3.5%)
    – 3.5
    (3.5%)

    Purpose of the assignment is vague or off topic.

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 3
    (3%)

    No purpose statement was provided. Bipolar Disorders essay assignment papers.

    Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:

    Understand and interpret the assignment’s key concepts.

    Points Range:
    9
    (9%)
    – 10
    (10%)

    Demonstrates the ability to critically appraise and intellectually explore key concepts.

    Points Range:
    8
    (8%)
    – 8
    (8%)

    Demonstrates a clear understanding of key concepts.

    Points Range:
    7
    (7%)
    – 7
    (7%)

    Shows some degree of understanding of key concepts.

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 6
    (6%)

    Shows a lack of understanding of key concepts, deviates from topics.

    Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:

    Apply and integrate material in course rsources (i.e. video, required readings, and textook) and credible outside resources.

    Points Range:
    18
    (18%)
    – 20
    (20%)

    Demonstrates and applies exceptional support of major points and integrates 2 or more credible outside sources, in addition to 2-3 course resources to suppport point of view.

    Points Range:
    16
    (16%)
    – 17
    (17%)

    Integrates specific information from 1 credible outside resource and 2-3 course resources to support major points and point of view.

    Points Range:
    14
    (14%)
    – 15
    (15%)

    Minimally includes and integrates specific information from 2-3 resources to support major points and point of view.

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 13
    (13%)

    Includes and integrates specific information from 0 to 1 resoruce to support major points and point of view.

    Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:

    Synthesize (combines various components or different ideas into a new whole) material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, textbook) and outside, credible resources by comparing different points of view and highlighting similarities, differences, and connections.

    Points Range:
    18
    (18%)
    – 20
    (20%)

    Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from sources to support major points presented. Applies meaning to the field of advanced nursing practice.

    Points Range:
    16
    (16%)
    – 17
    (17%)

    Summarizes information gleaned from sources to support major points, but does not synthesize.

    Points Range:
    14
    (14%)
    – 15
    (15%)

    Identifies but does not interpret or apply concepts, and/or strategies correctly; ideas unclear and/or underdeveloped. Bipolar Disorders essay assignment papers.

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 13
    (13%)

    Rarely or does not interpret, apply, and synthesize concepts, and/or strategies. Bipolar Disorders essay assignment papers.

    Written Expression and Formatting

    Paragraph and Sentence Structure: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are clearly structured and carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.

    Points Range:
    5
    (5%)
    – 5
    (5%)

    Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity

    Points Range:
    4
    (4%)
    – 4
    (4%)

    Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 80% of the time.

    Points Range:
    3.5
    (3.5%)
    – 3.5
    (3.5%)

    Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 60%- 79% of the time. Bipolar Disorders essay assignment papers.

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 3
    (3%)

    Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity < 60% of the time. Written Expression and Formatting English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Bipolar Disorders essay assignment papers. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Written Expression and Formatting The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors. Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3-4) APA format errors. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. Bipolar Disorders essay assignment papers. NURS_6670_Week5_Assignment2_Rubric Grid View List View Excellent Good Fair Poor Quality of Work Submitted: The extent of which work meets the assignned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking. Points Range: 27 (27%) – 30 (30%) Assignment exceeds expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 75% containing exceptional breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics. Points Range: 24 (24%) – 26 (26%) Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing good breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics. Points Range: 21 (21%) – 23 (23%) Assignment meets most of the expectations. One required topic is either not addressed or inadequately addressed. Bipolar Disorders essay assignment papers. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 20 (20%) Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not addressed or inadequately addressed. Quality of Work Submitted: The purpose of the paper is clear. Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) A clear and comprehensive purpose statement is provided which delineates all required criteria. Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Purpose of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive. Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Purpose of the assignment is vague or off topic. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) No purpose statement was provided. Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to: Understand and interpret the assignment’s key concepts. Points Range: 9 (9%) – 10 (10%) Demonstrates the ability to critically appraise and intellectually explore key concepts. Points Range: 8 (8%) – 8 (8%) Demonstrates a clear understanding of key concepts. Points Range: 7 (7%) – 7 (7%) Shows some degree of understanding of key concepts. Bipolar Disorders essay assignment papers. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 6 (6%) Shows a lack of understanding of key concepts, deviates from topics. Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to: Apply and integrate material in course rsources (i.e. video, required readings, and textook) and credible outside resources. Points Range: 18 (18%) – 20 (20%) Demonstrates and applies exceptional support of major points and integrates 2 or more credible outside sources, in addition to 2-3 course resources to suppport point of view. Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%) Integrates specific information from 1 credible outside resource and 2-3 course resources to support major points and point of view. Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) Minimally includes and integrates specific information from 2-3 resources to support major points and point of view. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 13 (13%) Includes and integrates specific information from 0 to 1 resoruce to support major points and point of view. Bipolar Disorders essay assignment papers. Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to: Synthesize (combines various components or different ideas into a new whole) material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, textbook) and outside, credible resources by comparing different points of view and highlighting similarities, differences, and connections. Points Range: 18 (18%) – 20 (20%) Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from sources to support major points presented. Applies meaning to the field of advanced nursing practice. Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%) Summarizes information gleaned from sources to support major points, but does not synthesize. Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) Identifies but does not interpret or apply concepts, and/or strategies correctly; ideas unclear and/or underdeveloped. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 13 (13%) Rarely or does not interpret, apply, and synthesize concepts, and/or strategies. Bipolar Disorders essay assignment papers. Written Expression and Formatting Paragraph and Sentence Structure: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are clearly structured and carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 80% of the time. Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 60%- 79% of the time. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity < 60% of the time. Written Expression and Formatting English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Bipolar Disorders essay assignment papers. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Written Expression and Formatting The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors. Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors. Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3-4) APA format errors. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. Bipolar Disorders essay assignment papers.

  • NURS 6670 – Anxiety Disorders, PTSD, and Related Disorders essay Assignment papers

    NURS 6670 – Anxiety Disorders, PTSD, and Related Disorders essay Assignment papers

    Week 6: Anxiety Disorders, PTSD, and Related Disorders

    Oh no! It is happening again. I am having a heart attack… I know it. My heart is racing, I can’t breathe, and I am shaking all over. I can’t go to the ER again. They will say what they always say… I am not having a heart attack. It is all in my head.

    Barbara, age 68

    The anxiety disorders provide us a good opportunity to take a close look at the nature/nurture debate as well as the gene/environment interactions that influence the nervous system and neurochemistry. A significant part of most of Sigmund Freud’s theories, the concept of anxiety has been debated and discussed over many years in the psychiatric literature. While Freud’s theories focused on the “mind” and the unconscious, another way to look at anxiety is with Hans Selye’s concept of “fight or flight” in which the sympathetic nervous system is activated as a response to stress. As you explore the concept of anxiety, you will notice that no two cases of anxiety are the same. NURS 6670 – Anxiety Disorders, PTSD, and Related Disorders essay Assignment papers.

    This week, you will explore evidence-based treatment methods for clients with anxiety disorders. You will complete a midterm exam and analyze reimbursement rates for treatment of mental health disorders.

    ORDER A CUSTOM-WRITTEN PAPER NOW

    Learning Resources

    Required Readings

    Sadock, B. J., Sadock, V. A., & Ruiz, P. (2014).
    Kaplan & Sadock’s synopsis of psychiatry: Behavioral sciences/clinical psychiatry
    (11th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.

    Chapter 9, “Anxiety Disorders” (pp. 387–417)

    Chapter 11, “Trauma- and Stressor-Related Disorders” (pp. 437–451)

    Gabbard, G. O. (2014).
    Gabbard’s treatment of psychiatric disorders
    (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publications. NURS 6670 – Anxiety Disorders, PTSD, and Related Disorders essay Assignment papers.

    Chapter 16, “Panic Disorder”

    Chapter 18, “Social Anxiety Disorder (Social Phobia)”

    Chapter 19, “Generalized Anxiety Disorder”

    Chapter 20, “Specific Phobia”

    Note:
    You will access this textbook from the Walden Library databases.

    American Psychiatric Association. (2013).
    Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders
    (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

    “Anxiety Disorders”

    “Trauma- and Stressor-Related Disorders”

    Note:
    You will access this book from the Walden Library databases.

    Stahl, S. M. (2014).
    Prescriber’s Guide: Stahl’s Essential Psychopharmacology
    (5th ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. NURS 6670 – Anxiety Disorders, PTSD, and Related Disorders essay Assignment papers.

     

    Note:
    All Stahl resources can be accessed through the Walden Library using the link below. This link will take you to a login page for the Walden Library. Once you log in to the library, the Stahl website will appear. http://ezp.waldenulibrary.org/login?url=http://stahlonline.cambridge.org/. NURS 6670 – Anxiety Disorders, PTSD, and Related Disorders essay Assignment papers.

     

    To access information on specific medications, click on
    The Prescriber’s Guide, 5th Ed
    . tab on the Stahl Online website and select the appropriate medication. NURS 6670 – Anxiety Disorders, PTSD, and Related Disorders essay Assignment papers.

     

    Anxiety

    Generalized anxiety disorder

    Panic disorder

    alprazolam

    amitriptyline

    amoxapine

    buspirone

    chlordiazepoxide

    citalopram

    clomipramine

    clonazepam

    clonidine

    clorazepate

    cyamemazine

    desipramine

    diazepam

    dothiepin

    doxepin

    duloxetine

    escitalopram

    fluoxetine

    fluvoxamine

    gabapentin (adjunct)

    hydroxyzine

    imipramine

    isocarboxazid

    lofepramine

    loflazepate

    lorazepam

    maprotiline

    mianserin

    mirtazapine

    moclobemide

    nefazodone

    nortriptyline

    oxazepam

    paroxetine

    phenelzine

    pregabalin

    reboxetine

    sertraline

    tiagabine

    tianeptine

    tranylcypromine

    trazodone

    trifluoperazine

    trimipramine

    venlafaxine

    vilazodone

    alprazolam

    citalopram

    desvenlafaxine

    duloxetine

    escitalopram

    fluoxetine

    fluvoxamine

    mirtazapine

    paroxetine

    pregabalin

    sertraline

    tiagabine (adjunct)

    venlafaxine. NURS 6670 – Anxiety Disorders, PTSD, and Related Disorders essay Assignment papers.

    alprazolam

    citalopram

    clonazepam

    desvenlafaxine

    escitalopram

    fluoxetine

    fluvoxamine

    isocarboxazid

    lorazepam

    mirtazapine

    nefazodone

    paroxetine

    phenelzine

    pregabalin

    reboxetine

    sertraline

    tranylcypromine

    venlafaxine

    Posttraumatic stress disorder

    Reversal of benzodiazepine effects

    Social anxiety disorder

    citalopram

    clonidine

    desvenlafaxine

    escitalopram

    fluoxetine

    fluvoxamine

    mirtazapine

    nefazodone

    paroxetine

    prazosin (nightmares)

    propranolol (prophylactic)

    sertraline

    venlafaxine

    flumazenil

    citalopram

    clonidine

    desvenlafaxine

    escitalopram

    fluoxetine

    fluvoxamine

    isocarboxazid

    moclobemide

    paroxetine

    phenelzine

    pregabalin

    sertraline

    tranylcypromine

    venlafaxine

    Maples-Keller, J. L., Price, M., Rauch, S., Gerardi, M., & Rothbaum, B. O. (2017). Investigating relationships between PTSD symptom clusters within virtual reality exposure therapy for OEF/OIF veterans.
    Behavior Therapy, 48
    (2), 147–155. doi:10.1016/j.beth.2016.02.011

     

    Note:
    You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

    Hayes, J. P., Logue, M. W., Reagan, A., Salat, D., Wolf, E. J., Sadeh, N., & … Miller, M. W. (2017). COMT Val158Met polymorphism moderates the association between PTSD symptom severity and hippocampal volume.
    Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience: JPN, 42
    (2), 95–102. doi:10.1503/jpn.150339

     

    Note:
    You will access this article from the Walden Library databases. NURS 6670 – Anxiety Disorders, PTSD, and Related Disorders essay Assignment papers.

    Quinn, B. L., & Peters, A. (2017). Strategies to reduce nursing student test anxiety: A literature review.
    Journal of Nursing Education, 56
    (3), 145–151. doi:10.3928/01484834-20170222-05

     

    Note:
    You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

    Document:
    Reimbursement Rate Template (Word document)

    Required Media

    Wolpe, J. (Producer). (n.d.).
    Joseph Wolpe on systematic desensitization
    [Video file]. Mill Valley, CA: Psychotherapy.net

     

    Note:
    The approximate length of this media piece is 59 minutes. You will access this video from the Walden Library databases

    Optional Resources

    Acosta, M. C., Possemato, K., Maisto, S. A., Marsch, L. A., Barrie, K., Lantinga, L., . . . Rosenblum, A. (2017). Web-delivered CBT reduces heavy drinking in OEF-OIF veterans in primary care with symptomatic substance use and PTSD. Behavior Therapy, 48(2), 262-–276. doi:10.1016/j.beth.2016.09.001

    Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Association (SAMHSA). (2014).
    TIP 57: Trauma-informed care in behavioral health services
    . Retrieved from: http://store.samhsa.gov/product/TIP-57-Trauma-Informed-Care-in-Behavioral-Health-Services/SMA14-4816

    Note:
    This document is available as a free download. NURS 6670 – Anxiety Disorders, PTSD, and Related Disorders essay Assignment papers.

    Discussion: Treatment of Anxiety Disorders

    Anxiety disorders are common in both primary care and psychiatric practice. Clients with anxiety disorders including generalized anxiety disorders, agoraphobia, and other specific phobias will present to the PMHNP’s office with a significant level of distress. Successful recognition and treatment of anxiety disorders includes an accurate diagnostic assessment with a treatment plan that includes a combination of psychopharmacology and psychotherapy. Although psychoanalytic theories are based on the concept of anxiety, the more recent standard of care is with the cognitive-behavioral therapies. NURS 6670 – Anxiety Disorders, PTSD, and Related Disorders essay Assignment papers.

    In this Discussion, you will analyze evidence-based treatment plans for clients with anxiety disorders.

    Learning Objectives

    Students will:

    Analyze differences between adjustments disorders and anxiety disorders

    Analyze diagnostic criteria for anxiety disorders

    Analyze evidence-based psychotherapy and psychopharmacologic treatment for anxiety disorders

    Compare differential diagnostic features of anxiety disorders

    Note:
    For this Discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the “Post to Discussion Question” link and then select “Create Thread” to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click submit, you cannot delete or edit your own posts and cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking Submit!NURS 6670 – Anxiety Disorders, PTSD, and Related Disorders essay Assignment papers.

    To prepare for this Discussion:

    By Day 5 of Week 5, your Instructor will have assigned you an anxiety disorder, which will be your focus for your initial post for this Discussion.

    Review the Learning Resources.

    By Day 3

    Post:

    Explain the difference between an adjustment disorder and anxiety disorder. Provide examples to illustrate your rationale.

    Explain the diagnostic criteria for your assigned anxiety disorder. NURS 6670 – Anxiety Disorders, PTSD, and Related Disorders essay Assignment papers.

    Explain the evidenced-based psychotherapy and psychopharmacologic treatment for your assigned anxiety disorder.

    Support your rationale with references to the Learning Resources or other academic resource.

    By Day 6

    Respond
    to at least
    two
    of your colleagues by comparing the differential diagnostic features of the disorder you were assigned to the diagnostic features of the disorder your colleagues were assigned. NURS 6670 – Anxiety Disorders, PTSD, and Related Disorders essay Assignment papers.

    Submission and Grading Information

    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Week 6 Discussion Rubric

    Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6

    To participate in this Discussion:

    Week 6 Discussion

    Assignment 1: Midterm Exam

    This exam is designed to assess how well you have synthesized the information from all your PMHNP courses. It draws upon the material from all the textbooks from NURS 6630, NURS 6640, NURS 6670, NURS 6660, and NURS 6670. It is very similar to what you will experience in your certification exam. NURS 6670 – Anxiety Disorders, PTSD, and Related Disorders essay Assignment papers.

    Learning Objectives

    Students will:

    Assess knowledge of adult and older adult psychotherapy concepts and principles

    This exam will cover the following topics:

    Psychiatric Assessment of the Adult and Older Adult

    Depressive Disorders

    Personality Disorders

    Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders

    Bipolar Disorders

    Anxiety Disorders, PTSD, & Related Disorders

    By Day 7

    Complete the Midterm Exam. Prior to starting the exam, you should review all of your materials. There is a 2-hour time limit to complete this 75-question exam. You may only attempt this exam once.

    This exam is a test of your knowledge in preparation for your certification exam.
    No outside resources
    including books, notes, websites, or any other type of resource are to be used to complete this exam. You are expected to
    comply with Walden University’s Code of Conduct
    .

    By Day 7

    Submit
    your Exam.

    Submission and Grading Information

    NURS_6670_Week6_Discussion_Rubric

    Grid View

    List View

    Outstanding Performance

    Excellent Performance

    Competent Performance

    Proficient Performance

    Room for Improvement

    Main Posting: Response to the discusion question is reflecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

    Points Range:
    44
    (44%)
    – 44
    (44%)

    * Thoroughly responds to the discusion question(s) *is reflecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. * supported by at least 3 current, credible sources

    Points Range:
    40
    (40%)
    – 43
    (43%)

    * Responds to the discusion question(s) *is reflecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module. * 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth * supported by at least 3 credible references

    Points Range:
    35
    (35%)
    – 39
    (39%)

    * Responds to most of the discusion question(s) *is somewhat reflecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module. * 50% of post has exceptional depth and breadth * supported by at least 3 credible references

    Points Range:
    31
    (31%)
    – 34
    (34%)

    * Responds to some of the discusion question(s) * one to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addresed *is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis *somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. * post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 30
    (30%)

    * Does not respond to the discusion question(s) * lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria *lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis *does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. * contains only 1 or no credible references. NURS 6670 – Anxiety Disorders, PTSD, and Related Disorders essay Assignment papers

    Main Posting: Writing

    Points Range:
    6
    (6%)
    – 6
    (6%)

    * Written clearly and concisely * Contains no grammatical or spelling errors * Fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style

    Points Range:
    5.5
    (5.5%)
    – 5.5
    (5.5%)

    * Written clearly and concisely * May contain one or no grammatical or spelling error * Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style

    Points Range:
    5
    (5%)
    – 5
    (5%)

    * Written concisely * May contain one to two grammatical or spelling error * Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style

    Points Range:
    4
    (4%)
    – 5
    (5%)

    *Writtten somewhat concisely * May contain more than two2 spelling or grammatical errors * Contains some APA formatting erros

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 4
    (4%)

    * Not written clearly or concisely * Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors * Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style

    Main Posting: Timely and full participation

    Points Range:
    10
    (10%)
    – 10
    (10%)

    * meets requirements for timely and full participation * posts main discussion by due date

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 0
    (0%)

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 0
    (0%)

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 0
    (0%)

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 6
    (6%)

    * does not meet requirement for full participation

    First Reponse

    Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.

    Points Range:
    9
    (9%)
    – 9
    (9%)

    * response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings * responds to questions posed by faculty * the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives

    Points Range:
    8.5
    (8.5%)
    – 8.5
    (8.5%)

    * response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings

    Points Range:
    7.5
    (7.5%)
    – 8
    (8%)

    * response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting

    Points Range:
    6.5
    (6.5%)
    – 7
    (7%)

    * response is on topic, may have some depth. NURS 6670 – Anxiety Disorders, PTSD, and Related Disorders essay Assignment papers.

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 6
    (6%)

    * reponse may not be on topic, lacks depth

    First Reponse: Writing

    Points Range:
    6
    (6%)
    – 6
    (6%)

    * Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed * Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources * Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

    Points Range:
    5.5
    (5.5%)
    – 5.5
    (5.5%)

    * Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are answered if posed * Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources * Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

    Points Range:
    5
    (5%)
    – 5
    (5%)

    * Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed * Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources * Response is written in Standard Edited English

    Points Range:
    4.5
    (4.5%)
    – 4.5
    (4.5%)

    * Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication * Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed * Few or no credible sources are cited

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 4
    (4%)

    * Responses posted in the discussion lack effective * Response to faculty questions are missing * No credible sources are cited. NURS 6670 – Anxiety Disorders, PTSD, and Related Disorders essay Assignment papers

    First Reponse: Timely and full participation

    Points Range:
    5
    (5%)
    – 5
    (5%)

    * meets requirements for timely and full participation * posts by due date

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 0
    (0%)

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 0
    (0%)

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 0
    (0%)

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 0
    (0%)

    * does not meet requirement for full participation

    Second Reponse: Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.

    Points Range:
    9
    (9%)
    – 9
    (9%)

    * response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings * responds to questions posed by faculty * the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives

    Points Range:
    8.5
    (8.5%)
    – 8.5
    (8.5%)

    * response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings

    Points Range:
    7.5
    (7.5%)
    – 8
    (8%)

    * response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting

    Points Range:
    6.5
    (6.5%)
    – 7
    (7%)

    * response is on topic, may have some depth

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 6
    (6%)

    * reponse may not be on topic, lacks depth. NURS 6670 – Anxiety Disorders, PTSD, and Related Disorders essay Assignment papers

    Second Reponse: Writing

    Points Range:
    6
    (6%)
    – 6
    (6%)

    * Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed * Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources * Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

    Points Range:
    5.5
    (5.5%)
    – 5.5
    (5.5%)

    * Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are answered if posed * Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources * Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

    Points Range:
    5
    (5%)
    – 5
    (5%)

    * Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed * Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources * Response is written in Standard Edited English

    Points Range:
    4.5
    (4.5%)
    – 4.5
    (4.5%)

    * Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication * Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed * Few or no credible sources are cited

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 4
    (4%)

    * Responses posted in the discussion lack effective * Response to faculty questions are missing * No credible sources are cited. NURS 6670 – Anxiety Disorders, PTSD, and Related Disorders essay Assignment papers

    Second Reponse: Timely and full participation

    Points Range:
    5
    (5%)
    – 5
    (5%)

    * meets requirements for timely and full participation * posts by due date

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 0
    (0%)

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 0
    (0%)

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 0
    (0%)

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 0
    (0%)

    * does not meet requirement for full participation. NURS 6670 – Anxiety Disorders, PTSD, and Related Disorders essay Assignment papers

  • NURS 6670 Midterm and Final Exam Study Guide – Questions and Answers

    NURS 6670 Midterm and Final Exam Study Guide – Questions and Answers

    Midterm Exam

    This exam is designed to assess how well you have synthesized the information from all your PMHNP courses. It draws upon the material from all the textbooks from NURS 6630, NURS 6640, NURS 6670, NURS 6660, and NURS 6670. It is very similar to what you will experience in your certification exam.

    Learning Objectives

    ORDER A CUSTOM-WRITTEN PAPER OR ONLINE EXAM NOW

    Students will:

    Assess knowledge of adult and older adult psychotherapy concepts and principles

    This exam will cover the following topics:

    Psychiatric Assessment of the Adult and Older Adult

    Depressive Disorders

    Personality Disorders

    Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders

    Bipolar Disorders

    Anxiety Disorders, PTSD, & Related Disorders

    By Day 7

    Complete the Midterm Exam. Prior to starting the exam, you should review all of your materials. There is a 2-hour time limit to complete this 75-question exam. You may only attempt this exam once. NURS 6670 Midterm and Final Exam Study Guide – Questions and Answers.

    This exam is a test of your knowledge in preparation for your certification exam.
    No outside resources
    including books, notes, websites, or any other type of resource are to be used to complete this exam. You are expected to
    comply with Walden University’s Code of Conduct
    .

    Final Exam

    This exam is designed to assess how well you have synthesized the information from all your PMHNP courses. It draws upon the material from all the textbooks from NURS 6630, NURS 6640, NURS 6670, NURS 6660, and NURS 6670. It is very similar to what you will experience in your certification exam. NURS 6670 Midterm and Final Exam Study Guide – Questions and Answers.

    Learning Objectives

    Students will:

    Assess knowledge of adult and older adult psychotherapy concepts and principles (E)

    This exam will cover the following topics:

    Obsessive-Compulsive Disorders

    Neurocognitive Disorders

    Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic Disorders

    Sleep/Wake Disorders, Parasomnias

    Gender Dysphoria, Paraphilic Disorders, & Sexual Dysfunction

    By Day 7

    Complete the Final Exam by. Prior to starting the exam, you should review all of your materials. There is a 2-hour time limit to complete this 75-question exam. You may only attempt this exam once. NURS 6670 Midterm and Final Exam Study Guide – Questions and Answers.

    This exam is a test of your knowledge in preparation for your certification exam.
    No outside resources
    including books, notes, websites, or any other type of resource are to be used to complete this exam. You are expected to
    comply with Walden University’s Code of Conduct
    . NURS 6670 Midterm and Final Exam Study Guide – Questions and Answers.

  • “Captain of the Ship” Project – Obsessive-Compulsive Disorders – NURS 6670

    “Captain of the Ship” Project – Obsessive-Compulsive Disorders – NURS 6670

    Week 7: Obsessive-Compulsive Disorders

    It is getting embarrassing to go to my hair stylist. She always comments on the bald patches on my head. They keep getting bigger as I continue to pull out one strand of hair at a time. I even do it in my sleep. I can’t help myself. It all started when I was in high school when I would pull just from the back. Now I have to wear my hair a specific way so the bald patches don’t show. I don’t even color my hair anymore. I don’t want anyone to notice me.

    Michelle, age 27

    Although actual statistics vary, obsessive-compulsive disorder impacts approximately 1.2% of the population in the United States (APA, 2013, p. 239). It is characterized by the presence of obsessive thoughts, which are manifested as persistent thoughts, images, or even “urges.” The only way that the individual can disperse the anxiety of these persistent thoughts/images or urges is to perform a behavior (the compulsion). The compulsion could be checking things, counting, reciting a silent prayer, or repeating a number of phrases. The disorder becomes so pervasive that the person can spend a significant amount of time each day attending to the compulsion in order to relieve the anxiety caused by the obsession. “Captain of the Ship” Project – Obsessive-Compulsive Disorders – NURS 6670.

    This week, you will, once again, become “captain of the ship” as you take full responsibility for a client with an obsessive-compulsive disorder by recommending psychopharmacologic treatment and psychotherapy, identifying medical management needs and community support, and recommending follow-up plans. You also will evaluate your progress in completing your certification plan.

    ORDER A CUSTOM-WRITTEN PAPER NOW

    Learning Resources

    Required Readings

    Sadock, B. J., Sadock, V. A., & Ruiz, P. (2014).
    Kaplan & Sadock’s synopsis of psychiatry: Behavioral sciences/clinical psychiatry
    (11th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer. “Captain of the Ship” Project – Obsessive-Compulsive Disorders – NURS 6670.

    Chapter 10, “Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders” (pp. 418–436)

    Gabbard, G. O. (2014).
    Gabbard’s treatment of psychiatric disorders
    (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publications.

    Chapter 21, “Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder”

    Note:
    You will access this textbook from the Walden Library databases.

    American Psychiatric Association. (2013).
    Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders
    (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author. “Captain of the Ship” Project – Obsessive-Compulsive Disorders – NURS 6670.

    “Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders”

    Note:
    You will access this book from the Walden Library databases.

    Stahl, S. M. (2014).
    Prescriber’s Guide: Stahl’s Essential Psychopharmacology
    (5th ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. “Captain of the Ship” Project – Obsessive-Compulsive Disorders – NURS 6670.

     

    Note:
    All Stahl resources can be accessed through the Walden Library using the link below. This link will take you to a login page for the Walden Library. Once you log in to the library, the Stahl website will appear. http://ezp.waldenulibrary.org/login?url=http://stahlonline.cambridge.org/

     

    To access information on specific medications, click on
    The Prescriber’s Guide, 5th Ed
    . tab on the Stahl Online website and select the appropriate medication.

     

    Obsessive-compulsive disorder

    citalopram

    clomipramine

    escitalopram

    fluoxetine

    fluvoxamine

    paroxetine

    sertraline

    venlafaxine

    vilazodone

    Thompson-Hollands, J., Edson, A., Tompson, M. C., & Comer, J. S. (2014). Family involvement in the psychological treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder: A meta-analysis.
    Journal of Family Psychology, 28
    (3), 287–298. doi:10.1037/a0036709. “Captain of the Ship” Project – Obsessive-Compulsive Disorders – NURS 6670.

     

    Note:
    You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

    Required Media

    Bruce, T. & Jongsma, A. (Producers). (n.d.)
    Evidence-based treatment planning for obsessive compulsive disorder
    [Video file]. Mill Valley, CA: Psychotherapy.net.

     

    Note:
    The approximate length of this media piece is 64 minutes. You will access this video from the Walden Library databases. “Captain of the Ship” Project – Obsessive-Compulsive Disorders – NURS 6670.

    Optional Resources

    Himle, J. A., Chatters, L. M., Taylor, R. J., & Nguyen, A. (2013). The relationship between obsessive-compulsive disorder and religious faith: Clinical characteristics and implications for treatment.
    Spirituality in Clinical Practice, 1
    (S), 53–70. doi:10.1037/2326-4500.1.S.53

    Wheaton, M. G., Rosenfield, D., Foa, E. B., & Simpson, H. B. (2015). Augmenting serotonin reuptake inhibitors in obsessive–compulsive disorder:
    What moderates improvement? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 83
    (5), 926–937. doi:10.1037/ccp0000025

    Assignment 1:

    “Captain of the Ship” Project – Obsessive-Compulsive Disorders

    In earlier weeks, you were introduced to the concept of the “captain of the ship.” In this Assignment, you become the “captain of the ship” as you provide treatment recommendations and identify medical management, community support resources, and follow-up plans for a client with an obsessive-compulsive disorder. “Captain of the Ship” Project – Obsessive-Compulsive Disorders – NURS 6670.

    Learning Objectives

    Students will:

    Recommend psychopharmacologic treatments based on therapeutic endpoints for clients with obsessive-compulsive disorders

    Recommend psychotherapy based on therapeutic endpoints for clients with obsessive-compulsive disorders

    Identify medical management needs for clients with obsessive-compulsive disorders

    Identify community support resources for clients with obsessive-compulsive disorders

    Recommend follow-up plans for clients with depression disorders

    To prepare for this Assignment:

    Select an adult or older adult client with an obsessive-compulsive disorder you have seen in your practicum.

    In 3–4 pages, write a treatment plan for your client in which you do the following:

    Describe the HPI and clinical impression for the client.

    Recommend psychopharmacologic treatments and describe specific and therapeutic endpoints for your psychopharmacologic agent. (This should relate to HPI and clinical impression.)

    Recommend psychotherapy choices (individual, family, and group) and specific therapeutic endpoints for your choices. “Captain of the Ship” Project – Obsessive-Compulsive Disorders – NURS 6670.

    Identify medical management needs, including primary care needs, specific to this client.

    Identify community support resources (housing, socioeconomic needs, etc.) and community agencies that are available to assist the client.

    Recommend a plan for follow-up intensity and frequency and collaboration with other providers.

    By Day 7

    Submit
    your Assignment.

    Submission and Grading Information

    To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

    Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK7Assgn1+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.

    Click the
    Week 7 Assignment 1 Rubric
    to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.

    Click the
    Week 7 Assignment 1
    link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area. “Captain of the Ship” Project – Obsessive-Compulsive Disorders – NURS 6670.

    Next, from the Attach File area, click on the
    Browse My Computer
    button. Find the document you saved as “WK7Assgn1+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click
    Open
    .

    If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for
    I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database
    .

    Click on the
    Submit
    button to complete your submission.

    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Week 7 Assignment 1 Rubric

    Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

    To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

    Submit your Week 7 Assignment 1 draft and review the originality report.

    Submit Your Assignment by Day 7

    To submit your Assignment:

    Week 7 Assignment 1

    Assignment 2:

    Week 7 Practicum Journal: Checkpoint for Certification Plan

    Learning Objectives

    Students will:

    Evaluate progress on certification plans

    Report your progress on the Certification Plan completed in Week 1 and submitted in Week 4.

    What have you done to prepare for your certification?

    Have you completed the scheduled tasks assigned on your timeline? If not, what are your plans to stay on schedule? “Captain of the Ship” Project – Obsessive-Compulsive Disorders – NURS 6670.

    By Day 7

    Submit
    your Assignment.

    Submission and Grading Information

    To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

    Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK7Assgn2+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.

    Click the
    Week 7 Assignment 2 Rubric
    to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.

    Click the
    Week 7 Assignment 2
    link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area. “Captain of the Ship” Project – Obsessive-Compulsive Disorders – NURS 6670.

    Next, from the Attach File area, click on the
    Browse My Computer
    button. Find the document you saved as “WK7Assgn2+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click
    Open
    .

    If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for
    I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database
    .

    Click on the
    Submit
    button to complete your submission. “Captain of the Ship” Project – Obsessive-Compulsive Disorders – NURS 6670.

    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Week 7 Assignment 2 Rubric

    Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

    To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

    Submit your Week 7 Assignment 2 draft and review the originality report. “Captain of the Ship” Project – Obsessive-Compulsive Disorders – NURS 6670.

    Submit Your Assignment by Day 7

    To submit your Assignment:

    Week 7 Assignment 2

    Assignment 3:

    Week 5 Practicum: Decision Tree

    By Day 7

    Submit
    your Assignment. Refer to Week 5 for additional guidance.

    Submission and Grading Information

    To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

    Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK7Assgn3+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.

    Click the
    Week 7 Assignment 3 Rubric
    to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.

    Click the
    Week 7 Assignment 3
    link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area. “Captain of the Ship” Project – Obsessive-Compulsive Disorders – NURS 6670.

    Next, from the Attach File area, click on the
    Browse My Computer
    button. Find the document you saved as “WK7Assgn3+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click
    Open
    .

    If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for
    I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database
    .

    Click on the
    Submit
    button to complete your submission.

    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Week 7 Assignment 3 Rubric

    Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

    To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

    Submit your Week 7 Assignment 3 draft and review the originality report. “Captain of the Ship” Project – Obsessive-Compulsive Disorders – NURS 6670.

    Submit Your Assignment by Day 7

    To submit your Assignment:

    Week 7 Assignment 3

    Assignment 4:

    Week 6 Practicum Journal – Reimbursement Rates

    By Day 7

    Submit
    your Assignment. Refer to Week 6 for additional guidance.

    Submission and Grading Information

    To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

    Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK7Assgn4+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name. “Captain of the Ship” Project – Obsessive-Compulsive Disorders – NURS 6670.

    Click the
    Week 7 Assignment 4 Rubric
    to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.

    Click the
    Week 7 Assignment 4
    link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.

    Next, from the Attach File area, click on the
    Browse My Computer
    button. Find the document you saved as “WK7Assgn4+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click
    Open
    .

    If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for
    I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database
    .

    Click on the
    Submit
    button to complete your submission. “Captain of the Ship” Project – Obsessive-Compulsive Disorders – NURS 6670.

    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Week 7 Assignment 4 Rubric

    Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

    To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

    Submit your Week 7 Assignment 4 draft and review the originality report.

    Submit Your Assignment by Day 7

    To submit your Assignment:

    Week 7 Assignment 4

    Assignment 5: Board Vitals

    This week you will be responding to twenty Board Vitals questions that cover a broad review of your Nurse Practitioner program courses up to this point.

    These review questions will provide practice that is critical in your preparation for the national certification exam that’s required to certify you to practice as a nurse practitioner. These customized test questions are designed to help you prepare for your Nurse Practitioner certification exam. It is in your best interest to take your time, do your best, and answer each question to the best of your ability. “Captain of the Ship” Project – Obsessive-Compulsive Disorders – NURS 6670.

    You can access Board Vitals through the link sent to you in email or by following the link below:

    https://www.boardvitals.com/

    By Day 7

    Complete the Board Vitals questions.

    Practicum Reminder

    Time Logs:
    You are required to keep a log of the time you spend related to your practicum experience
    and enter every patient you see each day
    . You can access your time log from the Welcome Page in your Meditrek account. You will track time individually for each patient you work with. Please make sure to continuously input your hours throughout the term. “Captain of the Ship” Project – Obsessive-Compulsive Disorders – NURS 6670.

     

    Making Connections

    This week, you, once again, became “captain of the ship” as you took full responsibility for a client with an obsessive-compulsive disorder by recommending psychopharmacologic treatment and psychotherapy, identifying medical management needs and community support, and recommending follow-up plans. “Captain of the Ship” Project – Obsessive-Compulsive Disorders – NURS 6670.

    Next week, you will explore evidence-based psychotherapy and psychopharmacologic treatment for neurocognitive disorders. You will complete your final Decision Tree as you rationalize and justify your diagnosis and treatment of a patient with a mental health disorder. “Captain of the Ship” Project – Obsessive-Compulsive Disorders – NURS 6670.

    NURS_6670_Week7_Assignment1_Rubric

    Grid View

    List View

    Excellent

    Good

    Fair

    Poor

    Quality of Work Submitted: The extent of which work meets the assignned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking.

    Points Range:
    27
    (27%)
    – 30
    (30%)

    Assignment exceeds expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 75% containing exceptional breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics.

    Points Range:
    24
    (24%)
    – 26
    (26%)

    Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing good breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics.

    Points Range:
    21
    (21%)
    – 23
    (23%)

    Assignment meets most of the expectations. One required topic is either not addressed or inadequately addressed.

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 20
    (20%)

    Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not addressed or inadequately addressed.

    Quality of Work Submitted: The purpose of the paper is clear.

    Points Range:
    5
    (5%)
    – 5
    (5%)

    A clear and comprehensive purpose statement is provided which delineates all required criteria.

    Points Range:
    4
    (4%)
    – 4
    (4%)

    Purpose of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

    Points Range:
    3.5
    (3.5%)
    – 3.5
    (3.5%)

    Purpose of the assignment is vague or off topic.

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 3
    (3%)

    No purpose statement was provided. “Captain of the Ship” Project – Obsessive-Compulsive Disorders – NURS 6670.

    Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:

    Understand and interpret the assignment’s key concepts.

    Points Range:
    9
    (9%)
    – 10
    (10%)

    Demonstrates the ability to critically appraise and intellectually explore key concepts.

    Points Range:
    8
    (8%)
    – 8
    (8%)

    Demonstrates a clear understanding of key concepts.

    Points Range:
    7
    (7%)
    – 7
    (7%)

    Shows some degree of understanding of key concepts. “Captain of the Ship” Project – Obsessive-Compulsive Disorders – NURS 6670.

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 6
    (6%)

    Shows a lack of understanding of key concepts, deviates from topics.

    Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:

    Apply and integrate material in course rsources (i.e. video, required readings, and textook) and credible outside resources.

    Points Range:
    18
    (18%)
    – 20
    (20%)

    Demonstrates and applies exceptional support of major points and integrates 2 or more credible outside sources, in addition to 2-3 course resources to suppport point of view.

    Points Range:
    16
    (16%)
    – 17
    (17%)

    Integrates specific information from 1 credible outside resource and 2-3 course resources to support major points and point of view.

    Points Range:
    14
    (14%)
    – 15
    (15%)

    Minimally includes and integrates specific information from 2-3 resources to support major points and point of view.

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 13
    (13%)

    Includes and integrates specific information from 0 to 1 resoruce to support major points and point of view. “Captain of the Ship” Project – Obsessive-Compulsive Disorders – NURS 6670.

    Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:

    Synthesize (combines various components or different ideas into a new whole) material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, textbook) and outside, credible resources by comparing different points of view and highlighting similarities, differences, and connections.

    Points Range:
    18
    (18%)
    – 20
    (20%)

    Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from sources to support major points presented. Applies meaning to the field of advanced nursing practice.

    Points Range:
    16
    (16%)
    – 17
    (17%)

    Summarizes information gleaned from sources to support major points, but does not synthesize.

    Points Range:
    14
    (14%)
    – 15
    (15%)

    Identifies but does not interpret or apply concepts, and/or strategies correctly; ideas unclear and/or underdeveloped.

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 13
    (13%)

    Rarely or does not interpret, apply, and synthesize concepts, and/or strategies. “Captain of the Ship” Project – Obsessive-Compulsive Disorders – NURS 6670.

    Written Expression and Formatting

    Paragraph and Sentence Structure: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are clearly structured and carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.

    Points Range:
    5
    (5%)
    – 5
    (5%)

    Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity

    Points Range:
    4
    (4%)
    – 4
    (4%)

    Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 80% of the time.

    Points Range:
    3.5
    (3.5%)
    – 3.5
    (3.5%)

    Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 3
    (3%)

    Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity < 60% of the time. “Captain of the Ship” Project – Obsessive-Compulsive Disorders – NURS 6670 Written Expression and Formatting English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Written Expression and Formatting The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors. Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3-4) APA format errors. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. “Captain of the Ship” Project – Obsessive-Compulsive Disorders – NURS 6670 NURS_6670_Week7_S/U_Assignment2_Rubric Grid View List View Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Quality of Work Submitted: The extent of which work meets the assignned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking. Points Range: 26 (26%) – 30 (30%) Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing good breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 25 (25%) Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not addressed or inadequately addressed. “Captain of the Ship” Project – Obsessive-Compulsive Disorders – NURS 6670. Quality of Work Submitted: The purpose of the paper is clear. Points Range: 4 (4%) – 5 (5%) Purpose of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) No purpose statement was provided. Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to: Understand and interpret the assignment’s key concepts. Points Range: 8 (8%) – 10 (10%) Demonstrates a clear understanding of key concepts. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 7 (7%) Shows a lack of understanding of key concepts, deviates from topics. “Captain of the Ship” Project – Obsessive-Compulsive Disorders – NURS 6670. Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to: Apply and integrate material in course rsources (i.e. video, required readings, and textook) and credible outside resources. Points Range: 16 (16%) – 20 (20%) Integrates specific information from 1 credible outside resource and 2-3 course resources to support major points and point of view. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 15 (15%) Includes and integrates specific information from 0 to 1 resoruce to support major points and point of view. Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to: Synthesize (combines various components or different ideas into a new whole) material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, textbook) and outside, credible resources by comparing different points of view and highlighting similarities, differences, and connections. Points Range: 16 (16%) – 20 (20%) Summarizes information gleaned from sources to support major points, but does not synthesize. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 15 (15%) Rarely or does not interpret, apply, and synthesize concepts, and/or strategies. “Captain of the Ship” Project – Obsessive-Compulsive Disorders – NURS 6670. Written Expression and Formatting Paragraph and Sentence Structure: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are clearly structured and carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. Points Range: 4 (4%) – 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 80% of the time. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity < 60% of the time. Written Expression and Formatting English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation Points Range: 3 (3%) – 5 (5%) Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Written Expression and Formatting The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. Points Range: 3 (3%) – 5 (5%) Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors. “Captain of the Ship” Project – Obsessive-Compulsive Disorders – NURS 6670 Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%) Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. NURS_6670_Week7_S/U_Assignment3_Rubric Grid View List View Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Quality of Work Submitted: The extent of which work meets the assignned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking. Points Range: 26 (26%) – 30 (30%) Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing good breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 25 (25%) Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not addressed or inadequately addressed. Quality of Work Submitted: The purpose of the paper is clear. Points Range: 4 (4%) – 5 (5%) Purpose of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) No purpose statement was provided. Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to: Understand and interpret the assignment’s key concepts. Points Range: 8 (8%) – 10 (10%) Demonstrates a clear understanding of key concepts. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 7 (7%) Shows a lack of understanding of key concepts, deviates from topics. Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to: Apply and integrate material in course rsources (i.e. video, required readings, and textook) and credible outside resources. Points Range: 16 (16%) – 20 (20%) Integrates specific information from 1 credible outside resource and 2-3 course resources to support major points and point of view. “Captain of the Ship” Project – Obsessive-Compulsive Disorders – NURS 6670 Points Range: 0 (0%) – 15 (15%) Includes and integrates specific information from 0 to 1 resoruce to support major points and point of view. Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to: Synthesize (combines various components or different ideas into a new whole) material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, textbook) and outside, credible resources by comparing different points of view and highlighting similarities, differences, and connections. Points Range: 16 (16%) – 20 (20%) Summarizes information gleaned from sources to support major points, but does not synthesize. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 15 (15%) Rarely or does not interpret, apply, and synthesize concepts, and/or strategies. “Captain of the Ship” Project – Obsessive-Compulsive Disorders – NURS 6670 Written Expression and Formatting Paragraph and Sentence Structure: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are clearly structured and carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. Points Range: 4 (4%) – 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 80% of the time. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity < 60% of the time. Written Expression and Formatting English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation Points Range: 3 (3%) – 5 (5%) Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Written Expression and Formatting The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. Points Range: 3 (3%) – 5 (5%) Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors. “Captain of the Ship” Project – Obsessive-Compulsive Disorders – NURS 6670 Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%) Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. NURS_6670_Week7_S/U_Assignment4_Rubric Grid View List View Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Quality of Work Submitted: The extent of which work meets the assignned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking. Points Range: 26 (26%) – 30 (30%) Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing good breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 25 (25%) Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not addressed or inadequately addressed. Quality of Work Submitted: The purpose of the paper is clear. Points Range: 4 (4%) – 5 (5%) Purpose of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) No purpose statement was provided. Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to: Understand and interpret the assignment’s key concepts. Points Range: 8 (8%) – 10 (10%) Demonstrates a clear understanding of key concepts. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 7 (7%) Shows a lack of understanding of key concepts, deviates from topics. Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to: Apply and integrate material in course rsources (i.e. video, required readings, and textook) and credible outside resources. Points Range: 16 (16%) – 20 (20%) Integrates specific information from 1 credible outside resource and 2-3 course resources to support major points and point of view. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 15 (15%) Includes and integrates specific information from 0 to 1 resoruce to support major points and point of view. “Captain of the Ship” Project – Obsessive-Compulsive Disorders – NURS 6670 Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to: Synthesize (combines various components or different ideas into a new whole) material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, textbook) and outside, credible resources by comparing different points of view and highlighting similarities, differences, and connections. Points Range: 16 (16%) – 20 (20%) Summarizes information gleaned from sources to support major points, but does not synthesize. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 15 (15%) Rarely or does not interpret, apply, and synthesize concepts, and/or strategies. Written Expression and Formatting Paragraph and Sentence Structure: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are clearly structured and carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. Points Range: 4 (4%) – 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 80% of the time. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity < 60% of the time. “Captain of the Ship” Project – Obsessive-Compulsive Disorders – NURS 6670 Written Expression and Formatting English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation Points Range: 3 (3%) – 5 (5%) Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Written Expression and Formatting The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. Points Range: 3 (3%) – 5 (5%) Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%) Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. “Captain of the Ship” Project – Obsessive-Compulsive Disorders – NURS 6670

  • Treatment of Neurocognitive Disorders Discussion and Decision Tree – NURS 6670

    Treatment of Neurocognitive Disorders Discussion and Decision Tree – NURS 6670

    Week 8: Neurocognitive Disorders

    My mother used to be a teacher—an elementary school teacher. We were all so proud of her when she completed her PhD when she was 50. Now she is 75 and has begun to have times when she does not know what day it is. We found her wandering around the neighborhood because she could not find her way home. Once, she forgot where she parked her car at the grocery store. She thought someone had stolen it. The manager was so kind to drive her around the parking lot until she recognized her car. We are afraid she might get hurt or lost. Treatment of Neurocognitive Disorders Discussion and Decision Tree – NURS 6670.

    Gary, age 50, son of Dorothy, age 75

    The neurocognitive disorders are unique among the other psychiatric disorders you have studied in that the diseases that are to blame for the neurocognitive manifestations that have been extensively studied. Additionally, these conditions are also acquired and represent a decline from a previous level of functioning. The neurocognitive disorders present a diagnostic challenge to the PMHNP in that many of the signs and symptoms overlap.

    This week, you will explore evidence-based psychotherapy and psychopharmacologic treatment for neurocognitive disorders. You will complete your final Decision Tree as you rationalize and justify your diagnosis and treatment of a patient with a mental health disorder.

    ORDER A CUSTOM-WRITTEN PAPER NOW

    Learning Resources

    Required Readings

    Sadock, B. J., Sadock, V. A., & Ruiz, P. (2014).
    Kaplan & Sadock’s synopsis of psychiatry: Behavioral sciences/clinical psychiatry
    (11th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.

    Chapter 21, “Neurocognitive Disorders” (pp. 694–741)

    Gabbard, G. O. (2014).
    Gabbard’s treatment of psychiatric disorders
    (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publications.

    Chapter 63, “Delirium”

    Chapter 64, “Neurocognitive Disorder Due to Alzheimer’s Disease”

    Chapter 65, “Frontotemporal Neurocognitive Disorder”

    Chapter 66, “Vascular Neurocognitive Disorder”

    Chapter 67, “Neurocognitive Disorder Due to Parkinson’s Disease”

    Note:
    You will access this textbook from the Walden Library databases.

    American Psychiatric Association. (2013).
    Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders
    (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author. Treatment of Neurocognitive Disorders Discussion and Decision Tree – NURS 6670.

    “Neurocognitive Disorders”

    Note:
    You will access this book from the Walden Library databases.

    Stahl, S. M. (2014).
    Prescriber’s Guide: Stahl’s Essential Psychopharmacology
    (5th ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

     

    Note:
    All Stahl resources can be accessed through the Walden Library using the link below. This link will take you to a login page for the Walden Library. Once you log in to the library, the Stahl website will appear. http://ezp.waldenulibrary.org/login?url=http://stahlonline.cambridge.org/

     

    To access information on specific medications, click on
    The Prescriber’s Guide, 5th Ed
    . tab on the Stahl Online website and select the appropriate medication. Treatment of Neurocognitive Disorders Discussion and Decision Tree – NURS 6670.

     

    Alzheimer disease

    Delirium

    Dementia

    Parkinson’s disease dementia

    caprylidene

    donepezil

    galantamine

    memantine

    rivastigmine

    haloperidol (adjunct)

    lorazepam (adjunct)

    donepezil

    galantamine

    memantine

    rivastigmine

    rivastigmine

    pimavanserin

    Note:
    For more information on Pimavanserin, see:

    Acadia Pharmaceuticals. (2017).
    Transform the treatment of Parkinson’s disease psychosis with NUPLAZID
    . Retrieved from https://www.nuplazidhcp.com/?gclid=CIHS5auvwtMCFQkaaQodrU0FGQ

    U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n. d.). Highlights of prescribing information: Nuplazid. Retrieved from https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2016/207318lbl.pdf

    Hopkins, S. A., & Chan, D. (2016). Key emerging issues in frontotemporal dementia.
    Journal of Neurology, 263
    (2), 407–413. doi:10.1007/s00415-015-7880-7. Treatment of Neurocognitive Disorders Discussion and Decision Tree – NURS 6670

     

    Note:
    You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

    Walker, Z., Possin, K. L., Boeve, B. F., & Aarsland, D. (2015). Lewy body dementias. The Lancet, 386(10004), 1683-1697.

     

    Note:
    You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

    Required Media

    Laureate Education (Producer). (2017a).
    A gentleman with a neurocognitive disorder
    [Multimedia file]. Baltimore, MD: Author. Treatment of Neurocognitive Disorders Discussion and Decision Tree – NURS 6670.

     

    Bolin, P. (2015, December 31).
    Neurocognitive disorders – CRASH! Medical review series
    [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bQXOPITY9XM

     

    Note:
    The approximate length of this media piece is 57 minutes.

    Optional Resources

    Kota, L. N., Bharath, S., Purushottam, M., Moily, N. S., Sivakumar, P. T., Varghese, M., . . . Jain, S. (2015). Reduced telomere length in neurodegenerative disorders may suggest shared biology.
    The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 27
    (2), e92–e96. doi:10.1176/appi.neuropsych.13100240

    Lepkowsky, C. M. (2016). Neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies: Evidence-based diagnosis and treatment.
    Practice Innovations, 1
    (4), 234–242. doi:10.1037/pri0000031

    Oltra-Cucarella, J., Pérez-Elvira, R., Espert, R., & Sohn McCormick, A. (2016). Are cognitive interventions effective in Alzheimer’s disease? A controlled meta-analysis of the effects of bias.
    Neuropsychology, 30
    (5), 631–652. doi:10.1037/neu0000283. Treatment of Neurocognitive Disorders Discussion and Decision Tree – NURS 6670.

    Discussion: Treatment of Neurocognitive Disorders

    Neurocognitive disorders (NCD) such as delirium, dementia, and amnestic disorders are more prevalent in older adults. As the population ages and as life expectancy in the United States continues to increase, the incidence of these disorders will continue to increase. Cognitive functioning such as memory, language, orientation, judgment, and problem solving are affected in clients with NCDs. Caring for someone with a neurocognitive disorder is not only challenging for the clinician, but also stressful for the family. The PMHNP needs to consider not only the client but also the “family as client.” Collaboration with primary care providers and specialty providers is essential. Anticipatory guidance also becomes extremely important.

    In this Discussion, you will integrate several sources of knowledge specific to NCDs as you discuss evidenced-based therapies used to treat these disorders. Treatment of Neurocognitive Disorders Discussion and Decision Tree – NURS 6670.

    Learning Objectives

    Students will:

    Analyze diagnostic criteria for neurocognitive disorders

    Analyze evidence-based psychotherapy and psychopharmacologic treatment for neurocognitive disorders

    Evaluate benefits and risks of neurocognitive therapies

    Compare differential diagnostic features of neurocognitive disorders

    Note:
    For this Discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the “Post to Discussion Question” link and then select “Create Thread” to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click submit, you cannot delete or edit your own posts, and cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking
    Submit!

    To prepare for this Discussion:

    By Day 5 of Week 7, your Instructor will have assigned you a neurocognitive disorder, which will be the focus for your initial post for this Discussion. Treatment of Neurocognitive Disorders Discussion and Decision Tree – NURS 6670

    Review the Learning Resources.

    By Day 3

    Post:

    Explain the diagnostic criteria for your assigned neurocognitive disorder.

    Explain the evidenced-based psychotherapy and psychopharmacologic treatment for your assigned neurocognitive disorder.

    Identify the risks of different types of therapy and explain how the benefits of the therapy that might be achieved might outweigh the risks.

    Support your rationale with references to the Learning Resources or other academic resource.

    By Day 6

    Respond
    to at least
    two
    of your colleagues by comparing the differential diagnostic features of the disorder you were assigned to the diagnostic features of the disorder your colleagues were assigned.

    Submission and Grading Information

    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Week 8 Discussion Rubric

    Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6

    To participate in this Discussion:

    Week 8 Discussion

    Assignment 1:

    Practicum: Decision Tree

    For this Assignment, as you examine the client case study in this week’s Learning Resources, consider how you might assess and treat adult and older adult clients presenting symptoms of a mental health disorder.

    The Assignment:

    Learning Objectives

    Students will:

    Evaluate clients for treatment of mental health disorders

    Analyze decisions made throughout diagnosis and treatment of clients with mental health disorders

    Examine Case 3
    : You will be asked to make three decisions concerning the diagnosis and treatment for this client. Be sure to consider co-morbid physical as well as mental factors that might impact the client’s diagnosis and treatment.

    At each Decision Point, stop to complete the following:

    Decision #1: Differential Diagnosis

    Which Decision did you select?

    Why did you select this Decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.

    What were you hoping to achieve by making this Decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.

    Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with Decision #1 and the results of the Decision. Why were they different?

    Decision #2: Treatment Plan for Psychotherapy

    Why did you select this Decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.

    What were you hoping to achieve by making this Decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.

    Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with Decision #2 and the results of the Decision. Why were they different? Treatment of Neurocognitive Disorders Discussion and Decision Tree – NURS 6670.

    Decision #3: Treatment Plan for Psychopharmacology

    Why did you select this Decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.

    What were you hoping to achieve by making this Decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.

    Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with Decision #3 and the results of the decision. Why were they different?

    Also include how ethical considerations might impact your treatment plan and communication with clients and their family. Treatment of Neurocognitive Disorders Discussion and Decision Tree – NURS 6670.

    Note:
    Support your rationale with a minimum of three academic resources. While you may use the course text to support your rationale, it will not count toward the resource requirement.

    By Day 7 of Week 10

    Submit
    your Assignment.

    Assignment 2: Board Vitals

    This week you will be responding to twenty Board Vitals questions that cover a broad review of your Nurse Practitioner program courses up to this point. Treatment of Neurocognitive Disorders Discussion and Decision Tree – NURS 6670.

    These review questions will provide practice that is critical in your preparation for the national certification exam that’s required to certify you to practice as a nurse practitioner. These customized test questions are designed to help you prepare for your Nurse Practitioner certification exam. It is in your best interest to take your time, do your best, and answer each question to the best of your ability. Treatment of Neurocognitive Disorders Discussion and Decision Tree – NURS 6670.

    You can access Board Vitals through the link sent to you in email or by following the link below:

    https://www.boardvitals.com/

    By Day 7

    Complete the Board Vitals questions.

    Making Connections

    This week, you explored evidence-based psychotherapy and psychopharmacologic treatment for neurocognitive disorders. You completed your final Decision Tree as you rationalized and justified your diagnosis and treatment of a patient with a mental health disorder.

    Next week, you will explore a wide variety of disorders along the schizophrenia spectrum as you become “captain of the ship” once again. You also will analyze issues involved with state practice agreements. Treatment of Neurocognitive Disorders Discussion and Decision Tree – NURS 6670.

    NURS_6670_Week8_Discussion_Rubric

    Grid View

    List View

    Outstanding Performance

    Excellent Performance

    Competent Performance

    Proficient Performance

    Room for Improvement

    Main Posting: Response to the discusion question is reflecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

    Points Range:
    44
    (44%)
    – 44
    (44%)

    * Thoroughly responds to the discusion question(s) *is reflecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. * supported by at least 3 current, credible sources

    Points Range:
    40
    (40%)
    – 43
    (43%)

    * Responds to the discusion question(s) *is reflecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module. * 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth * supported by at least 3 credible references

    Points Range:
    35
    (35%)
    – 39
    (39%)

    * Responds to most of the discusion question(s) *is somewhat reflecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module. * 50% of post has exceptional depth and breadth * supported by at least 3 credible references

    Points Range:
    31
    (31%)
    – 34
    (34%)

    * Responds to some of the discusion question(s) * one to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addresed *is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis *somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. * post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 30
    (30%)

    * Does not respond to the discusion question(s) * lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria *lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis *does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. * contains only 1 or no credible references. Treatment of Neurocognitive Disorders Discussion and Decision Tree – NURS 6670

    Main Posting: Writing

    Points Range:
    6
    (6%)
    – 6
    (6%)

    * Written clearly and concisely * Contains no grammatical or spelling errors * Fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style

    Points Range:
    5.5
    (5.5%)
    – 5.5
    (5.5%)

    * Written clearly and concisely * May contain one or no grammatical or spelling error * Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style

    Points Range:
    5
    (5%)
    – 5
    (5%)

    * Written concisely * May contain one to two grammatical or spelling error * Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style

    Points Range:
    4
    (4%)
    – 5
    (5%)

    *Writtten somewhat concisely * May contain more than two2 spelling or grammatical errors * Contains some APA formatting erros

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 4
    (4%)

    * Not written clearly or concisely * Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors * Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style

    Main Posting: Timely and full participation

    Points Range:
    10
    (10%)
    – 10
    (10%)

    * meets requirements for timely and full participation * posts main discussion by due date

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 0
    (0%)

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 0
    (0%)

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 0
    (0%)

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 6
    (6%)

    * does not meet requirement for full participation

    First Reponse

    Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.

    Points Range:
    9
    (9%)
    – 9
    (9%)

    * response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings * responds to questions posed by faculty * the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives

    Points Range:
    8.5
    (8.5%)
    – 8.5
    (8.5%)

    * response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings

    Points Range:
    7.5
    (7.5%)
    – 8
    (8%)

    * response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting

    Points Range:
    6.5
    (6.5%)
    – 7
    (7%)

    * response is on topic, may have some depth

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 6
    (6%)

    * reponse may not be on topic, lacks depth

    First Reponse: Writing

    Points Range:
    6
    (6%)
    – 6
    (6%)

    * Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed * Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources * Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

    Points Range:
    5.5
    (5.5%)
    – 5.5
    (5.5%)

    * Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are answered if posed * Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources * Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

    Points Range:
    5
    (5%)
    – 5
    (5%)

    * Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed * Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources * Response is written in Standard Edited English

    Points Range:
    4.5
    (4.5%)
    – 4.5
    (4.5%)

    * Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication * Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed * Few or no credible sources are cited

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 4
    (4%)

    * Responses posted in the discussion lack effective * Response to faculty questions are missing * No credible sources are cited. Treatment of Neurocognitive Disorders Discussion and Decision Tree – NURS 6670.

    First Reponse: Timely and full participation

    Points Range:
    5
    (5%)
    – 5
    (5%)

    * meets requirements for timely and full participation * posts by due date

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 0
    (0%)

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 0
    (0%)

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 0
    (0%)

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 0
    (0%)

    * does not meet requirement for full participation

    Second Reponse: Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.

    Points Range:
    9
    (9%)
    – 9
    (9%)

    * response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings * responds to questions posed by faculty * the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives

    Points Range:
    8.5
    (8.5%)
    – 8.5
    (8.5%)

    * response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings

    Points Range:
    7.5
    (7.5%)
    – 8
    (8%)

    * response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting

    Points Range:
    6.5
    (6.5%)
    – 7
    (7%)

    * response is on topic, may have some depth

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 6
    (6%)

    * reponse may not be on topic, lacks depth

    Second Reponse: Writing

    Points Range:
    6
    (6%)
    – 6
    (6%)

    * Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed * Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources * Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

    Points Range:
    5.5
    (5.5%)
    – 5.5
    (5.5%)

    * Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are answered if posed * Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources * Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

    Points Range:
    5
    (5%)
    – 5
    (5%)

    * Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed * Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources * Response is written in Standard Edited English

    Points Range:
    4.5
    (4.5%)
    – 4.5
    (4.5%)

    * Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication * Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed * Few or no credible sources are cited

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 4
    (4%)

    * Responses posted in the discussion lack effective * Response to faculty questions are missing * No credible sources are cited. Treatment of Neurocognitive Disorders Discussion and Decision Tree – NURS 6670

    Second Reponse: Timely and full participation

    Points Range:
    5
    (5%)
    – 5
    (5%)

    * meets requirements for timely and full participation * posts by due date

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 0
    (0%)

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 0
    (0%)

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 0
    (0%)

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 0
    (0%)

    * does not meet requirement for full participation. Treatment of Neurocognitive Disorders Discussion and Decision Tree – NURS 6670Treatment of Neurocognitive Disorders Discussion and Decision Tree – NURS 6670

  • Captain of the Ship Project – Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic Disorders Assignment

    Captain of the Ship Project – Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic Disorders Assignment

    Week 9: Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic Disorders

    I am being followed. They are even in my home. I am crouched in the corner of my apartment, but they know I am here and are just waiting to get me. I have a secret and they are trying to get it. The secret is hidden in my brain and they are going to open my skull to get it out. I have to block them from getting into my brain. Hiding in the closet, behind all the clothes, they will not see me….

    Jamie, age 26

    There are many disorders that result in the development of “positive” symptoms, such as hallucinations and delusions, but not all of these conditions represent schizophrenia. When treating schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders, emphasis should be placed not only on treating the positive symptoms but the negative and residual symptoms as well. Captain of the Ship Project – Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic Disorders Assignment.

    This week, you will explore a wide variety of disorders along the schizophrenia spectrum as you become “captain of the ship” once again. You also will analyze issues involved with state practice agreements.

    ORDER A CUSTOM-WRITTEN PAPER NOW

    Learning Resources

    Note:
    To access this week’s required library resources, please click on the link to the Course Readings List, found in the
    Course Materials
    section of your Syllabus.

    Required Readings

    Sadock, B. J., Sadock, V. A., & Ruiz, P. (2014).
    Kaplan & Sadock’s synopsis of psychiatry: Behavioral sciences/clinical psychiatry
    (11th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.

    Chapter 7, “Schizophrenia Spectrum and other Psychotic Disorders” (pp. 300–346)

    Gabbard, G. O. (2014).
    Gabbard’s treatment of psychiatric disorders
    (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publications. Captain of the Ship Project – Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic Disorders Assignment.

    Chapter 8, “Early-Stage Schizophrenia”

    Chapter 9, “Toward a Dimensional Understanding of Psychosis and Its Treatment”

    Chapter 10, “Psychosocial Treatments for Chronic Psychosis”

    Chapter 11, “Pharmacological Treatment of Psychosis”

    Note
    : You will access this book from the Walden Library databases.

    American Psychiatric Association. (2013).
    Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders
    (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

    “Schizophrenia Spectrum and other Psychotic Disorders”

    Note
    : You will access this book from the Walden Library databases.

    Stahl, S. M. (2014).
    Prescriber’s Guide: Stahl’s Essential Psychopharmacology
    (5th ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

     

    Note:
    All Stahl resources can be accessed through the Walden Library using the link below. This link will take you to a login page for the Walden Library. Once you log in to the library, the Stahl website will appear. Captain of the Ship Project – Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic Disorders Assignment.

     

    To access information on specific medications, click on
    The Prescriber’s Guide, 5
    th
    Ed.
    tab on the Stahl Online website and select the appropriate medication.

    Psychosis

    Schizoaffective disorder

    alprazolam (adjunct)

    amisulpride

    aripiprazole

    asenapine

    blonanserin

    carbamazepine (adjunct)

    chlorpromazine

    clonazepam (adjunct)

    clozapine

    cyamemazine

    flupenthixol

    fluphenazine

    haloperidol

    iloperidone

    lamotrigine (adjunct)

    lorazepam (adjunct)

    loxapine

    lurasidone

    mesoridazine

    molindone

    olanzapine

    paliperidone

    perospirone

    perphenazine

    pimozide

    pipothiazine

    quetiapine

    risperidone

    sertindole

    sulpiride

    thioridazine

    thiothixene

    trifluoperazine

    valproate (divalproex) (adjunct)

    ziprasidone

    zotepine

    zuclopenthixol

    amisulpride

    aripiprazole

    asenapine

    carbamazepine (adjunct)

    chlorpromazine

    clozapine

    cyamemazine

    flupenthixol

    haloperidol

    iloperidone

    lamotrigine (adjunct)

    l-methylfolate (adjunct)

    loxapine

    lurasidone

    mesoridazine

    molindone

    olanzapine

    paliperidone

    perospirone

    perphenazine

    pipothiazine

    quetiapine

    risperidone

    sertindole

    sulpiride

    thioridazine

    thiothixene

    trifluoperazine

    valproate (divalproex) (adjunct)

    ziprasidone

    zotepine

    zuclopenthixol

    Schizophrenia

    Cataplexy syndrome

    Catatonia

    Extrapyramidal side effects

    amisulpride

    aripiprazole

    asenapine

    carbamazepine (adjunct)

    chlorpromazine

    clozapine

    cyamemazine

    flupenthixol

    haloperidol

    iloperidone

    lamotrigine (adjunct)

    l-methylfolate (adjunct)

    loxapine

    lurasidone

    mesoridazine

    molindone

    olanzapine

    paliperidone

    perospirone

    perphenazine

    pipothiazine

    quetiapine

    risperidone

    sertindole

    sulpiride

    thioridazine

    thiothixene

    trifluoperazine

    valproate (divalproex) (adjunct)

    ziprasidone

    zotepine

    zuclopenthixol

    Seasonal affective disorder

    bupropion

    Sedation-induction

    hydroxyzine

    midazolam

    clomipramine

    imipramine

    sodium oxybate

    alprazolam

    chlordiazepoxide

    clonazepam

    clorazepate

    diazepam

    estazolam

    flunitrazepam

    flurazepam

    loflazepate

    lorazepam

    midazolam

    oxazepam

    quazepam

    temazepam

    triazolam

    benztropine

    diphenhydramine

    trihexyphenidyl. Captain of the Ship Project – Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic Disorders Assignment

    Ferreira, C. D., de Souza, M. G. D., Fernández-Calvo, B., Machado-de-Sousa, J. P., Cecilio Hallak, J. E., & Torro-Alves, N. (2016). Neurocognitive functions in schizophrenia: A systematic review of the effects of typical and atypical antipsychotic drugs.
    Psychology & Neuroscience, 9
    (1), 12–31. doi:10.1037/pne0000045

     

    Note
    : You will access this article through the Walden Library databases.

    Granholm, E., Holden, J., Link, P. C., & McQuaid, J. R. (2014). Randomized clinical trial of cognitive behavioral social skills training for schizophrenia: Improvement in functioning and experiential negative symptoms.
    Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 82
    (6), 1173–1185. doi:10.1037/a0037098

     

    Note
    : You will access this article through the Walden Library databases.

    Required Media

    Murphy, L. (2011, July 21).
    Types of schizophrenia – A day in the life (scary)
    [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LWYwckFrksg

    Assignment 1: “Captain of the Ship” Project – Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic Disorders

    In earlier weeks, you were introduced to the concept of the “captain of the ship.” In this Assignment, you become the “captain of the ship” once again as you provide treatment recommendations and identify medical management, community support resources, and follow-up plans for a client with a schizophrenia spectrum/other psychotic disorder. Captain of the Ship Project – Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic Disorders Assignment

    Learning Objectives

    Students will:

    Recommend psychopharmacologic treatments based on therapeutic endpoints for clients with schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders

    Recommend psychotherapy based on therapeutic endpoints for clients with schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders

    Identify medical management needs for clients with schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders

    Identify community support resources for clients with schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders

    Recommend follow-up plans for clients with schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders

    To prepare for this Assignment:

    Select an adult or older adult client with a schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorder you have seen in your practicum.

    In 3–4 pages, write a treatment plan for your client in which you do the following:

    Describe the HPI and clinical impression for the client.

    Recommend psychopharmacologic treatments and describe specific and therapeutic endpoints for your psychopharmacologic agent. (This should relate to HPI and clinical impression.)

    Recommend psychotherapy choices (individual, family, and group) and specific therapeutic endpoints for your choices.

    Identify medical management needs, including primary care needs, specific to this client.

    Identify community support resources (housing, socioeconomic needs, etc.) and community agencies that are available to assist the client. Captain of the Ship Project – Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic Disorders Assignment

    Recommend a plan for follow-up intensity and frequency and collaboration with other providers.

    By Day 7

    Submit
    your Assignment.

    Submission and Grading Information

    To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

    Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK9Assgn1+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.

    Click the
    Week 9 Assignment 1 Rubric
    to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.

    Click the
    Week 9 Assignment 1
    link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.

    Next, from the Attach File area, click on the
    Browse My Computer
    button. Find the document you saved as “WK9Assgn1+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click
    Open
    .

    If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for
    I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database
    .

    Click on the
    Submit
    button to complete your submission.

    Grading Criteria

    To access your rubric:

    Week 9 Assignment 1 Rubric

    Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

    To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

    Submit your Week 9 Assignment 1 draft and review the originality report. v.

    Submit Your Assignment by Day 7

    To submit your Assignment:

    Week 9 Assignment 1

    Assignment 2:

    Week 9 Practicum Journal: State Practice Agreements

    In many states, nurse practitioners are completely autonomous professionals. In other states, however, NPs have a wide range of “restrictive” practice ranging from requirements for a “supervising” physician to requirements for a “collaborative” agreement with a physician.

    In this Practicum Journal Assignment, you will examine the requirements of your own state in order to prepare yourself for the realities of practice upon graduation. Captain of the Ship Project – Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic Disorders Assignment.

    Learning Objectives

    Students will:

    Analyze state PMHNP practice agreements

    Analyze physician collaboration issues

    Analyze barriers to PMHNP independent practice

    Create plans for addressing state PMHNP practice issues

    **Assigned in Week 9 and submitted in Week 10

    To Prepare for this Practicum Journal:

    Review practice agreements in your state.

    Identify at least two physician collaboration issues in your state.

    For this Practicum Journal:

    Briefly describe the practice agreements for PMHNPs in your state.

    Explain the two physician collaboration issues that you identified.

    Explain what you think are the barriers to PMHNPs practicing independently in your state.

    Outline a plan for how you might address PMHNP practice issues in your state.

    By Day 7 of Week 10

    Submit
    your Practicum Journal.

    Assignment 3: Board Vitals

    This week you will be responding to twenty Board Vitals questions that cover a broad review of your Nurse Practitioner program courses up to this point. Captain of the Ship Project – Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic Disorders Assignment.

    These review questions will provide practice that is critical in your preparation for the national certification exam that’s required to certify you to practice as a nurse practitioner. These customized test questions are designed to help you prepare for your Nurse Practitioner certification exam. It is in your best interest to take your time, do your best, and answer each question to the best of your ability.

    You can access Board Vitals through the link sent to you in email or by following the link below: Captain of the Ship Project – Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic Disorders Assignment.

    https://www.boardvitals.com/

    By Day 7

    Complete the Board Vitals questions.

    Making Connections

    This week, you explored a wide variety of disorders along the schizophrenia spectrum as you became “captain of the ship” once again. You also analyzed issues involved with state practice agreements.

    Next week, you will analyze the diagnostic criteria and treatment options of insomnia, hypersomnolence, narcolepsy, sleep apnea, non-rapid eye movement, nightmare disorder, sleep behavior disorder, and other DSM-5 sleep and parasomnic disorders. Captain of the Ship Project – Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic Disorders Assignment.

    NURS_6670_Week9_Assignment1_Rubric

    Grid View

    List View

    Excellent

    Good

    Fair

    Poor

    Quality of Work Submitted: The extent of which work meets the assignned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking.

    Points Range:
    27
    (27%)
    – 30
    (30%)

    Assignment exceeds expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 75% containing exceptional breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics.

    Points Range:
    24
    (24%)
    – 26
    (26%)

    Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing good breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics.

    Points Range:
    21
    (21%)
    – 23
    (23%)

    Assignment meets most of the expectations. One required topic is either not addressed or inadequately addressed.

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 20
    (20%)

    Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not addressed or inadequately addressed.

    Quality of Work Submitted: The purpose of the paper is clear.

    Points Range:
    5
    (5%)
    – 5
    (5%)

    A clear and comprehensive purpose statement is provided which delineates all required criteria.

    Points Range:
    4
    (4%)
    – 4
    (4%)

    Purpose of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

    Points Range:
    3.5
    (3.5%)
    – 3.5
    (3.5%)

    Purpose of the assignment is vague or off topic.

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 3
    (3%)

    No purpose statement was provided.

    Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:

    Understand and interpret the assignment’s key concepts.

    Points Range:
    9
    (9%)
    – 10
    (10%)

    Demonstrates the ability to critically appraise and intellectually explore key concepts.

    Points Range:
    8
    (8%)
    – 8
    (8%)

    Demonstrates a clear understanding of key concepts.

    Points Range:
    7
    (7%)
    – 7
    (7%)

    Shows some degree of understanding of key concepts.

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 6
    (6%)

    Shows a lack of understanding of key concepts, deviates from topics.

    Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:

    Apply and integrate material in course rsources (i.e. video, required readings, and textook) and credible outside resources.

    Points Range:
    18
    (18%)
    – 20
    (20%)

    Demonstrates and applies exceptional support of major points and integrates 2 or more credible outside sources, in addition to 2-3 course resources to suppport point of view.

    Points Range:
    16
    (16%)
    – 17
    (17%)

    Integrates specific information from 1 credible outside resource and 2-3 course resources to support major points and point of view.

    Points Range:
    14
    (14%)
    – 15
    (15%)

    Minimally includes and integrates specific information from 2-3 resources to support major points and point of view.

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 13
    (13%)

    Includes and integrates specific information from 0 to 1 resoruce to support major points and point of view. Captain of the Ship Project – Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic Disorders Assignment

    Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:

    Synthesize (combines various components or different ideas into a new whole) material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, textbook) and outside, credible resources by comparing different points of view and highlighting similarities, differences, and connections.

    Points Range:
    18
    (18%)
    – 20
    (20%)

    Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from sources to support major points presented. Applies meaning to the field of advanced nursing practice.

    Points Range:
    16
    (16%)
    – 17
    (17%)

    Summarizes information gleaned from sources to support major points, but does not synthesize.

    Points Range:
    14
    (14%)
    – 15
    (15%)

    Identifies but does not interpret or apply concepts, and/or strategies correctly; ideas unclear and/or underdeveloped.

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 13
    (13%)

    Rarely or does not interpret, apply, and synthesize concepts, and/or strategies. Captain of the Ship Project – Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic Disorders Assignment

    Written Expression and Formatting

    Paragraph and Sentence Structure: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are clearly structured and carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.

    Points Range:
    5
    (5%)
    – 5
    (5%)

    Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity

    Points Range:
    4
    (4%)
    – 4
    (4%)

    Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 80% of the time.

    Points Range:
    3.5
    (3.5%)
    – 3.5
    (3.5%)

    Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.

    Points Range:
    0
    (0%)
    – 3
    (3%)

    Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity < 60% of the time. Written Expression and Formatting English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Written Expression and Formatting The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors. Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3-4) APA format errors. Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. Captain of the Ship Project – Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic Disorders Assignment