Author: admin

For #3 in the directions of the CAPS 401 General Education Capstone assignment, I am posting questions below for you to address. 
 Please cite references in your response. You may use the text from your paper to answer these questions.

1. What was the primary question of your research?

BUY A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

2. After going through the paper development process, did you have to change your research question?

3. Which level of inquiry question (scientific, mathematical, cultural, or ethical)  was the most challenging to answer? (Include a paragraph from this section of your paper to show what you were able to include.)

4.  What is one simple to implement solution or improvement that you think would help the population impacted by your research topic?

5. In conclusion, what was one takeaway you gained from the research/one major point?

6. What is one question that you could develop/ask now to further investigate the topic you researched? CAPS 401 General Education Capstone

Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews

Create a 6- to 7-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following:

BUY A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest.

Describe how you developed a PICO(T) question focused on your chosen clinical issue of interest.

Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you selected.

Provide APA citations of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected.

Describe the levels of evidence in each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, including an explanation of the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. Be specific and provide examples. Advanced Clinical Inquiry And Systematic Reviews

nurs 6052 Wk 4 Discussion post sample POST:

I work on an acute inpatient psychiatric unit where all of the patients have been detained on involuntary holds. A high number of these patients are readmitted over and over again. There are several agencies in my county that serve the same population, the patients hop from one facility to the next depending on who has an open bed. Having witnessed this firsthand, I can appreciate the need for strong outpatient support services and timely follow up appointments. My clinical area of interest deals with how prompt follow up care is associated with a reduction in rapid (within 30 days of discharge) readmission rates.

BUY A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

My PICOT question is:

In psychiatric patients, how does having outpatient supports and follow up appointments in the first 30 days of discharge compared with having delayed follow up care or no follow-up care affect readmission rates to an inpatient psychiatric facility within 30 days of discharge? nurs 6052 Wk 4 Discussion post sample

For the search, I used CINAHL Plus with full text, MEDLINE with full text, PubMed, PsychInfo, and Academic Search Complete all accessed through the Walden library (Walden University, 2019). The terms used during this search included “psychiatric readmission”, “psychiatric readmission rates”, “behavioral health,” or “mental health” in the first search box. nurs 6052 Wk 4 Discussion post sample. Additionally, the terms “psychiatric units,” “adults,” “inpatient psychiatry,” “rehospitalization,” “prevention,” “psych hospitals,” and “readmission rates” were used. Using Boolean operators “AND” and “OR” I was able to focus my search further to better answer the PICOT question (Walden University Library). In general, I prefer to narrow my searches by choosing full text, peer-reviewed journals and limiting the date range within the last five years.

In the CINAHL database, I used the search terms “psychiatric readmission rates” AND “factors or causes or influences,” this search yielded 52 articles, they were trimmed down by checking the full-text box (33 articles) and limiting the date range to 2015-present. The use of these additional modifiers reduced the results to 17 articles. There are one or two that may be useful to my PICOT question, but there not enough quality results. I then searched “readmission” AND “psychiatric units” AND “adults,” which resulted in 147 articles. These were further focused by selecting ‘full text”, peer-reviewed”, and “academic journals” with a date range between 2015-present. This resulted in 25 articles, many of which look to be useful for this project nurs 6052 Wk 4 Discussion post sample.

The formation of a PICOT question is the first step of evidence-based practice (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2019). According to Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt (2019), it is essential to formulate a focused, well-designed PICOT question in order to generate relevant information. The PICOT question should include the patient population, intervention or issue of interest, comparison intervention, outcome, and a time frame in order to be specific enough to result in relevant results in a timely fashion (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2019). Before formulating a PICOT question, one must decide on a clinical area that interests them and generate a background question, one that is broad in nature (Stillwell, Fineout-Overholt, Melnyk & Williamson, 2010). Once the broad question has been formed, the next step is to narrow the area of interest into a foreground question which is more specific and relevant to the topic (Stillwell, Fineout-Overholt, Melnyk & Williamson, 2010). Utilizing the terms that comprise the PICOT, one can search databases to find pertinent research for their inquiry (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2019). More results can be obtained by using synonyms in the search and by separating terms with “OR” within the search boxes themselves (Walden University, 2019).

 

References

Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2019). 
Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare a guide to best practice
 (4th ed.). Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer.

Stillwell, S. B., Fineout-Overholt, E., Melnyk, B. M. & Williamson, K. M. (2010). Evidence-Based Practice, Step by Step: Searching for the Evidence. AJN, American Journal of Nursing, 110(5), 41-47. DOI: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000372071.24134.7e. nurs 6052 Wk 4 Discussion post sample

Walden University Library. (n.d.). Evidence-Based Practice Research: CINAHL Search Help. Retrieved December 17, 2019, from 
https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/healthevidence/cinahlsearchhelp
.

Walden University. (2019). Databases A-Z. Retrieved December 17, 2019, from 
https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/az.php?s=19981
. nurs 6052 Wk 4 Discussion post sample

For this Head-to-Toe Assessment Sample essay assignment, perform a complete head-to-toe assessment on one of your chosen participants. Your analysis should include the following:

BUY A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Topical headings to delineate systems.

For any system for which you do not have equipment, explain how you would do the assessment.

Detailed review of each system with normal and abnormal findings, along with normal laboratory findings for client age.

An analysis of age-specific risk reduction, health screen, and immunizations.

Your expectation of normal findings and what might indicate abnormal findings in your review of systems.

The differential diagnosis (disease) associated with possible abnormal findings. Head-to-Toe Assessment Sample essay.

A plan of care (including nursing diagnosis, interventions, evaluation).

Client and age-appropriate evidenced based practice strategies for health promotion.

Pharmacological treatments that can be used to address health issues for this client.

Provide your answers in a 6- to 7-page Microsoft Word Head-to-Toe Assessment Sample essay document.

Support your responses with examples.

On a separate references page, cite all sources using APA format.

Use this
 
APA Citation Helper
 
as a convenient reference for properly citing resources.

This handout will provide you the details of
 
formatting your essay using APA style
.

You may create your essay in this
 
APA-formatted template
. Head-to-Toe Assessment Sample essay

Male & Female Reproductive System Essay

Using the South University Online Library or the Internet, research the conditions affecting the male and female reproductive systems. Based on your research and understanding, respond to one of the following scenarios:

BUY A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Scenario 2:

A 44-year-old obese female is admitted to the emergency room with fever and severe abdominal pain on the upper right side that radiates to the scapula. She states that she feels nauseated. She states that the pain began at a friend’s house during a party and is becoming more severe. You can see that she is quite uncomfortable. Male & Female Reproductive System Essay

What could be the underlying cause of these symptoms?

What examinations would you perform? Why?

What laboratory tests would be needed to confirm possible differential diagnoses?

What pharmaceutical drugs are approved for treating the diagnosis that you concluded for this case?

Citations should conform to APA guidelines. You may use this APA Citation Helper as a convenient reference for properly citing resources or connect to the APA Style website through the APA icon below Male & Female Reproductive System Essay

The Impact Of Standardized Nursing Terminology Essay

Among the Resources in this module is the Rutherford (2008) article 
Standardized Nursing Language: What Does It Mean for Nursing Practice?
 In this article, the author recounts a visit to a local hospital to view the recent implementation of a new coding system.

During the visit, one of the nurses commented to her, “We document our care using standardized nursing languages but we don’t fully understand why we do” (Rutherford, 2008, para. 1).

How would you respond to a comment such as this one?

BUY A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

To Prepare:

Review the concepts of informatics as presented in the Resources, particularly Rutherford, M. (2008) 
Standardized Nursing Language: What Does It Mean for Nursing Practice
?

Reflect on the role of a nurse leader as a knowledge worker.

Consider how knowledge may be informed by data that is collected/accessed.

The Impact Of Standardized Nursing Terminology Essay

The Assignment:

In a 2- to 3-page paper, address the following:

Explain how you would inform this nurse (and others) of the importance of standardized nursing terminologies.

Describe the benefits and challenges of implementing standardized nursing terminologies in nursing practice. Be specific and provide examples.

Be sure to support your paper with peer-reviewed research on standardized nursing terminologies that you consulted from the Walden Library. The Impact Of Standardized Nursing Terminology Essay

4. Create your Nursing Informatics Assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources, use APA style as required, check your spelling.

Signature Assignment Title:
 
Informatics in Healthcare

Signature Assignment Description/Directions:

Beginning in Module 1 of this course you have been researching a healthcare informatics topic of your choice. Now you will present your findings in a 7 to 12 minute recorded presentation complete with PowerPoint slides (no length requirement).

BUY A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Discuss your topic and its relationship to your current (or future) practice. Discuss why the topic is important in healthcare informatics. Nursing Informatics.

What research have you have found on the topic? Describe how each scholarly article relates to the topic and your current (or future) practice. Describe what conclusions you have drawn based on your research of the topic.

What ethical or legal issues does this topic present?

Create a plan for implementing a change (or justify the need for no change). Who needs to be involved? What training programs are needed? Is there a need for on-going training? Discuss how you would evaluate the success of the change (or the continued success of what you are currently doing). What is the cost to implement or maintain this change? Who will be financially responsible? How feasible is this change? Nursing Informatics

Finally, identify how changes in public policy and technological advances in the future could impact this topic. What would those changes mean to the healthcare industry?

Nursing Informatics Assignment Expectations

Length
: Recorded presentation between 7 and 12 minutes in length. The presentation should include a PowerPoint and oral presentation of the slides. There is no slide number requirement. Answer all questions thoroughly with the allotted time. Use a recording platform of your choice and either upload as an mp4 or share the link directly to the video in the dropbox.

Structure
: Include a title slide, objective slide, content slides, reference slide in APA format.

References
: Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. Include at least three (3) scholarly sources to support your claims.

Rubric
: This assignment uses a rubric for scoring. Please review it as part of your assignment preparation and again prior to submission to ensure you have addressed its criteria at the highest level. Nursing Informatics

Format
: Save your assignment as an mp4 document (.mp4) or share the link to the recording Nursing Informatics

File name
: Name your saved file according to your first initial, last name, and the module number (for example, “RHall Module 1.mp4”)

Presentation
: Use presentation software (ex. PowerPoint, Google Slides) to create a visual presentation. Then use a recording program to record a 7 and 12 minutes in length presentation.
 ***Please do not record as voice-over PowerPoint because this cannot be saved in mp4 format or a link.*** 
If you submit your assignment as a PowerPoint with voice over recording you will not receive credit for your assignment (or partial credit as you did not meet the full requirements of the assignment.)

Total Point Value of Nursing Informatics Assignment
:
 
500 points

Literature Evaluation Table

Student Name:

Change Topic (2-3 sentences):

BUY A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

 

Criteria

Article 1

Article 2

Article 3

Article 4

Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and

Permalink or Working Link to Access Article

 

 

 

Article Title and Year Published

 

Research Questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative), and Purposes/Aim of Study

 

Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative)

 

Literature Evaluation Table

Setting/Sample

 

Methods: Intervention/Instruments

 

Analysis

 

Key Findings

 

Recommendations

 

Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP/Capstone Project

 

 

 

Criteria

Article 5

Article 6

Article 7

Article 8

Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and

Permalink or Working Link to Access Article

 

 

 

Article Title and Year Published

 

Research Questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative), and Purposes/Aim of Study

 

Literature Evaluation Table

Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative)

 

Setting/Sample

 

Methods: Intervention/Instruments

 

Analysis

 

Key Findings

 

Recommendations

 

Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP/Capstone

 

Literature Evaluation Table

 

 

 

Literature Evaluation Table

In nursing practice, accurate identification and application of research is essential to achieving successful outcomes. Being able to articulate the information and successfully summarize relevant peer-reviewed articles in a scholarly fashion helps to support the student’s ability and confidence to further develop and synthesize the progressively more complex assignments that constitute the components of the course change proposal capstone project. Literature Evaluation Table.

For this assignment, the student will provide a synopsis of eight peer-reviewed articles from nursing journals using an evaluation table that determines the level and strength of evidence for each of the eight articles. The articles should be current within the last 5 years and closely relate to the PICOT statement developed earlier in this course. The articles may include quantitative research, descriptive analyses, longitudinal studies, or meta-analysis articles. A systematic review may be used to provide background information for the purpose or problem identified in the proposed capstone project. Use the “Literature Evaluation Table” resource to complete this assignment.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

Attachments
NRS-490-RS-LiteratureEvaluationTable.docx

RUBRIC

Attempt Start Date:
 
16-Dec-2019 at 12:00:00 AM

Due Date:
 
22-Dec-2019 at 11:59:59 PM

Maximum Points:
 
75.0

Literature Evaluation Table – Rubric

No of Criteria: 13 Achievement Levels: 5
CriteriaAchievement LevelsDescriptionPercentageUnsatisfactory 0-71%0.00 %Less Than Satisfactory 72-75%75.00 %Satisfactory 76-79%79.00 %Good 80-89%89.00 %Excellent 90-100%100.00 %Article Selection100.0
    Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and Permalink or Working Link to Access Article5.0Author, journal (peer-reviewed), and permalink or working link to access article section is not included.Author, journal (peer-reviewed), and permalink or working link to access article section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.Author, journal (peer-reviewed), and permalink or working link to access article section is present.Author, journal (peer-reviewed), and permalink or working link to access article section is clearly provided and well developed.Author, journal (peer-reviewed), and permalink or working link to access article section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details.Article Title and Year Published 5.0Article title and year published section is not included.Article title and year published section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.Article title and year published section is present.Article title and year published section is clearly provided and well developed.Article title and year published section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details.Research Questions (Qualitative) or Hypothesis (Quantitative), and Purposes or Aim of Study10.0Research questions (qualitative) or hypothesis (quantitative), and purposes or aim of study section is not included.Research questions (qualitative) or hypothesis (quantitative), and purposes or aim of study section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.Research questions (qualitative) or hypothesis (quantitative), and purposes or aim of study section is present.Research questions (qualitative) or hypothesis (quantitative), and purposes or aim of study section is clearly provided and well developed.Research questions (qualitative) or hypothesis (quantitative), and purposes or aim of study section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details.Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative)5.0Design (type of quantitative, or type of qualitative) section is not included.Design (type of quantitative, or type of qualitative) section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.Design (type of quantitative, or type of qualitative) section is present.Design (type of quantitative, or type of qualitative) section is clearly provided and well developed.Design (type of quantitative, or type of qualitative) section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details.Setting or Sample5.0Setting or sample section is not included.Setting or sample section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.Setting or sample section is present.Setting or sample section is clearly provided and well developed.Setting or sample section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details.Methods: Intervention or Instruments5.0Methods: Intervention or instruments section is not included.Methods: Intervention or instruments section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.Methods: Intervention or instruments section is present.Methods: Intervention or instruments section is clearly provided and well developed.Methods: Intervention or instruments section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details.Analysis10.0Analysis section is not included.Analysis section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.Analysis section is present.Analysis section is clearly provided and well developed.Analysis section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details.Key Findings10.0Key findings section is not included.Key findings section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.Key findings section is present.Key findings section is clearly provided and well developed.Key findings section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details. Literature Evaluation Table. Recommendations10.0Recommendations section is not included.Recommendations section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.Recommendations section is present.Recommendations section is clearly provided and well developed.Recommendations section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details.Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP or Capstone10.0Explanation of how the article supports EBP or capstone section is not included.Explanation of how the article supports EBP or capstone section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.Explanation of how the article supports EBP or capstone section is present.Explanation of how the article supports EBP or capstone section is clearly provided and well developed.Explanation of how the article supports EBP or capstone section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details.Presentation10.0The piece is not neat or organized, and it does not include all required elements.The work is not neat and includes minor flaws or omissions of required elements.The overall appearance is general, and major elements are missing.The overall appearance is generally neat, with a few minor flaws or missing elements.The work is well presented and includes all required elements. The overall appearance is neat and professional.Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)10.0Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed.Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)5.0Sources are not documented.Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Total Percentage  100 Literature Evaluation Table

Literature Evaluation Table

Student Name:

Change Topic (2-3 sentences):

 

Criteria

Article 1

Article 2

Article 3

Article 4

Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and

Permalink or Working Link to Access Article

 

 

 

Article Title and Year Published

 

Research Questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative), and Purposes/Aim of Study

 

Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative)

 

Setting/Sample

 

Methods: Intervention/Instruments

 

Analysis

 

Key Findings

 

Recommendations

 

Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP/Capstone Project

 

 

 

Criteria

Article 5

Article 6

Article 7

Article 8

Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and

Permalink or Working Link to Access Article

 

 

 

Article Title and Year Published

 

Research Questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative), and Purposes/Aim of Study

 

Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative)

 

Setting/Sample

 

Methods: Intervention/Instruments

 

Analysis

 

Key Findings

 

Recommendations

 

Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP/Capstone

 

 

Delusional Disorders

Examine Case Study
:
 
Pakistani Female With Delusional Thought Processes

BACKGROUND:

The client is a 34-year-old Pakistani female who moved to the United States in her late teens/early 20s. She is currently in an “arranged” marriage (her husband was selected for her since she was 9 years old). She presents to your office today following a 21 day hospitalization for what was diagnosed as “brief psychotic disorder.” She was given this diagnosis as her symptoms have persisted for less than 1 month.

Prior to admission, she was reporting visions of Allah, and over the course of a week, she believed that she was the prophet Mohammad. She believed that she would deliver the world from sin. Her husband became concerned about her behavior to the point that he was afraid of leaving their 4 children with her. One evening, she was “out of control” which resulted in his calling the police and her subsequent admission to an inpatient psych unit.

During today’s assessment, she appears quite calm, and insists that the entire incident was “blown out of proportion.” She denies that she believed herself to be the prophet Mohammad and states that her husband was just out to get her because he never loved her and wanted an “American wife” instead of her. She tells you that she knows this because the television is telling her so.

She currently weighs 140 lbs, and is 5’ 5”

SUBJECTIVE:

Client reports that her mood is “good.” She denies auditory/visual hallucinations, but believes that the television does talk to her. She believes that Allah sends her messages through the TV. At times throughout the clinical interview, she becomes hostile towards the PMHNP, but then calms down.

You reviewed her hospital records and find that she has been medically worked up by a physician who reported her to be in overall good health. Lab studies were all within normal limits.

Client admits that she stopped taking her Risperdal about a week after she got out of the hospital because she thinks her husband is going to poison her so that he can marry an American woman.

MENTAL STATUS EXAM:

The client is alert, oriented to person, place, time, and event. She is dressed appropriately for the weather and time of year. She demonstrates no noteworthy mannerisms, gestures, or tics. Her speech is slow and at times, interrupted by periods of silence. Self-reported mood is euthymic. Affect constricted. Although the client denies visual or auditory hallucinations, she appears to be “listening” to something. Delusional and paranoid thought processes as described, above. Insight and judgment are impaired. She is currently denying suicidal or homicidal ideation.

The PMHNP administers the PANSS which reveals the following scores:

-40 for the positive symptoms scale

-20 for the negative symptom scale

-60 for general psychopathology scale

Diagnosis:
 Schizophrenia, paranoid type

The Assignment
:

With Introduction and a Conclusion.

Examine Case Study: Pakistani Woman with Delusional Thought Processes.
 You will be asked to make three decisions concerning the medication to prescribe to this client. Be sure to consider factors that might impact the client’s pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes.

At each decision point stop to complete the following:

· 
Decision #1

o Which decision did you select?

o Why did you select this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.

o What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.

o Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with Decision #1 and the results of the decision. Why were they different?

· 
Decision #2

o Why did you select this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.

o What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.

o Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with Decision #2 and the results of the decision. Why were they different?

· 
Decision #3

o Why did you select this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.

o What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources.

o Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with Decision #3 and the results of the decision. Why were they different?

Also include how ethical considerations might impact your treatment plan and communication with clients.

Note: Support your rationale with a minimum of three to five academic resources no more than five years old.

Collaborative Decision Making Through Shared Governance

Attend a committee meeting in your health care organization. If you are not currently employed in a health care setting, you may elect to attend a committee meeting at another company, a community center, a local school, local chamber of commerce or other professional organization.

BUY A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Observe the interactions between committee members and the process used by the committee to arrive at decisions.

In 500-750 words, describe the function of the committee and the roles of those in attendance. Describe your observations of the interactions between members of the committee and determine whether the process used to arrive at decisions is a form of shared governance.

A minimum of two academic references from credible sources are required for this Collaborative Decision Making Through Shared Governance assignment.

Submit the completed “Collaborative Committee Meeting Verification Form” with the assignment.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the 
LopesWrite Technical Support articles
 for assistance.

Attachments
AMP450.R.CollaborativeMeetingVerificationForm_11-18-13.doc
  Collaborative Decision Making Through Shared Governance

Pharmacotherapy For Gastrointestinal And Hepatobiliary Disorders

CASE STUDY: Patient HL comes into the clinic with the following symptoms: nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. The patient has a history of drug abuse and possible Hepatitis C. HL is currently taking the following prescription drugs:

Synthroid 100 mcg daily

Nifedipine 30 mg daily

Prednisone 10 mg daily

Gastrointestinal (GI) and hepatobiliary disorders affect the structure and function of the GI tract. Many of these disorders often have similar symptoms, such as abdominal pain, cramping, constipation, nausea, bloating, and fatigue. Since multiple disorders can be tied to the same symptoms, it is important for advanced practice nurses to carefully evaluate patients and prescribe a treatment that targets the cause rather than the symptom. Pharmacotherapy For Gastrointestinal And Hepatobiliary Disorders.

Once the underlying cause is identified, an appropriate drug therapy plan can be recommended based on medical history and individual patient factors. In this Assignment, you examine a case study of a patient who presents with symptoms of a possible GI/hepatobiliary disorder, and you design an appropriate drug therapy plan.

BUY A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

To Prepare

Review the case study assigned by your Instructor for this Assignment

Reflect on the patient’s symptoms, medical history, and drugs currently prescribed.

Think about a possible diagnosis for the patient. Consider whether the patient has a disorder related to the gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary system or whether the symptoms are the result of a disorder from another system or other factors, such as pregnancy, drugs, or a psychological disorder. Pharmacotherapy For Gastrointestinal And Hepatobiliary Disorders.

Consider an appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient’s history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed.

By Day 7 of Week 4

Write
 a 2-page paper that addresses the following:

Explain your diagnosis for the patient, including your rationale for the diagnosis.

Describe an appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient’s history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed.

Justify why you would recommend this drug therapy plan for this patient

five references not more than 5 years

zero plagiarism Pharmacotherapy For Gastrointestinal And Hepatobiliary Disorders