Category: Writing

You are graduate student in pharmacology at a large
university working under the direction of a senior researcher. You notice, on
reading a paper on the pharmacology of a new serotonin reuptake inhibitor,
which your senior director published in a top journal in your fi eld, that
there are problems with the diagrams in the paper. You cannot seem to reconcile
the diagrams with the published data. You approach her with this problem, and
she shrugs it off, saying that you do not understand the research well enough
to make a judgment about it. What should you do?

This assessment is a hurdle task and will constitute 40% of your overall mark in the Unit. Please write the protocol for a hypothetical clinical trial of your design. Do not copy or modify an existing clinical trial protocol. Use the headings and sub-headings outlined below. The word limit for this assessment is 2400 words. When you save your assignment for submission please include your name in the filename
Attachments:
6766855_1_mph-5236-assessment-4-template.pdf

Create a digital marketing campaign for the ‘direct competitor’ of your chosen brand in your assessment one. A campaign means incorporating/using a central theme or idea for a marketing strategy. For instance, Coca-Cola is known for its standout campaign. It uses the central idea of sharing. As such, the tagline‘Share a coke became popular. In terms of online channels, content with the share a coke tagline and storytellingwerespreadacrossFacebook, YouTube, Instagram, and so forth. The company also explored‘interactivity’to establish relationship between the product and consumers. The campaign addressed the brand’s objectives–revenue, engagement, and an intimaterelationship between consumers and the product.Overall, a campaign focussedon a central theme–typicallycreative andwith a‘wow’factor’. It servedas a backbone for the utilisation of channels andcontentsfor generating revenue.

Georgina is contracted by a Web design consultancy company to interview their staff to ascertain their current knowledge. The aim of the study is to inform the company about the type of training courses they need to implement. The aim of the study therefore is to highlight areas of overall weakness as opposed to individual shortcomings. Despite this, the type of data collected will be able to identify individual weaknesses. Georgina advised all interviewees that all information gathered from interviewees would remain private. Following the study, the Senior Vice President of the company, Gopal approaches Georgina and asks: “Who did well and who didn’t in this study?” Georgina refuses to answer Gopal’s question on privacy grounds. In his response, Gopal implies that Georgina won’t get another contract with the company if she continues to “hold out on him”.
What professional ethical dilemmas are Georgina and Gopal dealing with here? (e.g.
Should we allow or sanction Georgina or Gopal’s behaviour? Is there a public interest question raised by this scenario? What actions do everyone involved need to take to ensure that this kind of situation does not occur again?
)
Section 1 – The White Framework
Student Instructions:
Fill in the Table below using short sentences or dot points to make a list in each section. You must fill out all three table cells under Issues/Results prior to marking it as complete. You should input 350-500 words into this section.
Case Study
Name & Number:
Step
Process/Step
Issues/Results
Step 1:
Analyze – The Consequences
Step 2:
Analyze – The Actions
Step 3:
Make A Decision
Section 2 – The Governance and Regulatory Environment
Part 1 – ACS Code of Professional Conduct Analysis
Identify the appropriate ACS Code of Professional Conduct values along with the relevant sub-paragraph topics by number and sub-paragraph (e.g. 1.2.6 (g) – endeavour to extend public knowledge and understanding of ICT). Group each by value and appropriate corresponding sub-paragraphs relevant to your case study.
Case Study:
(
Name & Number
)
ACS Code of Professional Conduct Value & Section:
1.2.?
ACS Code of Professional Conduct Section:
1.2.?
ACS Code of Professional Conduct Section:
1.2.?
ACS Code of Professional Conduct Section:
1.2.?
Section 2 – The Governance and Regulatory Environment
Part 2 – Legislative and International Standards Analysis
Identify the appropriate Australian Legislation (e.g. Fair Work Act; Privacy Act). Identify and list relevant Australian/International Organization for Standardization/International Electrotechnical Commission (AS ISO/IEC) (e.g. AS ISO/IEC 38500:2016). Provide at least four items in each category in the boxes below.
Case Study:
Australian Legislation
AS/ISO/IEC Standards
Section 3 – Justifying a Decision and Recommending Appropriate Action
Make short text responses to the five (5) questions in the spaces provided. Each response should be between 50 – 80 words (Total not to exceed 400 words).
1. What were the most important professional ethics issues/dilemmas for you in your scenario? (Reference at least two core issues)
2. What do you believe are the most appropriate decisions to be made here for management, organisation and employees?
3. Who is responsible for taking what action here and why? (Name names!)
4. What can be done, or what strategies can be implemented to ensure that a similar situation does not occur again?
5. What did you learn from reading this scenario?

How do you ensure that peer review/data audit is workable,
and how would you modify it to accomplish its purpose in your research
environment? Can you suggest a whole new system to ensure the quality and
integrity of research data?

• Grammar ( One use of punctuation mark)
• Semicolons ( ; ) : Some triangles are congruent ; others are similar. • Exclamations ( ! ) : What a beautiful three dimensional figure. • Quote Marks ( ‘ or ” ) : f(X) and f”(X) represent first and second order derivatives of f(X) with respect to x • Apostrophes ( ‘ ) : A circle’s diameter is the largest chord. • Hyphens ( -) : The diagonals of a rhombus bis-• sect each other_
Attachments:
6766376_1_screenshot-20210607-204558-word.jpg