Tag: Clinical-Nursing

  • Change project: patients with type 2 diabetes, lifestyle modification essay

    Change project: patients with type 2 diabetes, lifestyle modification essay

    Change project: In South Florida patients with type 2 diabetes, does lifestyle modification such as diet and physical activity help lower HBA1C compared to

    those who do not make life style changes.

    Write a literature review of your change project topic using peer-reviewed articles, books, and evidence-based guidelines. Identify and cite all sources of data according to APA guidelines. The goal is to review and critique the most current research to support your change project; this research will help drive the focus of your research.Summarize the key findings and provide a transition to the methods, intervention, or clinical protocol section of your final paper. Describe any gaps in knowledge that you found and the effects this may have on nursing practice as it relates to your change project topic. The literature review should be a synthesis of how each article relates to your change project. Also, when writing your literature review, remember to include subtopics to your main topic and gather data on these areas as well. For example, if you are doing a project on cancer, then subtopics for cancer treatments should be included.

    A minimum of 10 Peer-reviewed articles

    Literature is supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely. Subtopics

    are used to support the main topic.

    Presents a thorough and insightful analysis of significant findings related to the change project topic. Ideas are synthesized and professionally sound and creative. Insightful and comprehensive conclusions and solutions are present

    Your integrative literature review should be at least 6 pages. Change project: patients with type 2 diabetes, lifestyle modification essay

  • Quantitative Research Designs: Dr. Kristen Mauk – Quantitative research for evidence-based practice

    Quantitative Research Designs: Dr. Kristen Mauk – Quantitative research for evidence-based practice

    Discussion: Quantitative Research Designs

    In order to find the best information on a topic, not only should you develop a question and search for resources, but you should also know how to analyze the value of the resources that you identify. There are different ways to evaluate resources, such as using the hierarchy of evidence, which you explored in Week 4 of this course. Another way to evaluate resources is to consider the appropriateness of the research design. Understanding how research designs contribute to the quality of a study is essential for being able to analyze resources when conducting a literature review or locating evidence for practice.

    ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW

    In this Discussion, you consider the different research designs and evaluate how these designs have been used to research a specific topic. You also consider strategies for selecting an appropriate research design.

    To prepare:

    Review the information in the course texton quantitative research designs. Focus on the information in Box 9.1, “Guidelines for Critiquing Research Designs in Quantitative Studies” located on page 210 of the course text.

    Select a topic from the list below and search the Walden Library to find two different quantitative research studies addressing that issue:

    Caregiver stress

    Anxiety in children

    Sleep apnea

    Depression in college freshmen

    Rural health care issues

    Post-traumatic stress syndrome

    Traumatic brain injury in veterans

    Health effects of environmental contaminants

    Bipolar disorder

    End-of-life ethical issues

    Alternative medicine

    For each of the sources that you select, identify the type of quantitative research design used, and evaluate whether it is the most appropriate approach to the research. Quantitative Research Designs: Dr. Kristen Mauk – Quantitative research for evidence-based practice

    Consider the ramifications of choosing an inappropriate design for a research study.

    By Day 3

    Post the topic you selected, references for the two sources you identified, and the quantitative research design used in each. Critique the appropriateness of the design used and justify your comments with information from the Learning Resources. Discuss the ramifications of choosing an inappropriate design for a research study.

    Required Readings

    Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2017). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (10th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer. Quantitative Research Designs: Dr. Kristen Mauk – Quantitative research for evidence-based practice

    Chapter 8, “Planning a Nursing Study”

    This chapter focuses on the necessary steps for planning a research study. It describes different research designs and their key features and discusses how to plan for data collection.

    Chapter 9, “Quantitative Research Design”

    This chapter explores quantitative research in greater depth including the importance of experimental design and the role of randomization in conducting research. The chapter also describes quasi-experimental design and observational research. Quantitative Research Designs: Dr. Kristen Mauk – Quantitative research for evidence-based practice

    Media

    Laureate Education (Producer). (2012m). Quantitative research for evidence-based practice. Baltimore, MD: Author.

    Note: The approximate length of this media piece is 5 minutes.

    In this video, Dr. Kristen Mauk explains specific quantitative research designs, methods, and considerations related to her Doctorate of Nursing Practice (DNP) project. She discusses how she developed her research design and how she used sound quantitative research methods throughout her project.

     

    Quantitative Research for Evidence-Based Practice Program Transcript

    NARRATOR: Quantitative research includes any study or project that involves

    the use of numerical data or information that can be described using numbers.

    But having an effective research design is critical for the validity and success of

    all quantitative research ventures. In this video, Doctor Kristen Mauk speaks

    about the design of her DNP project, which explored the effect of education on

    new nurses in a rehabilitation unit.

    Doctor Mauk’s project can be considered a quantitative study, because it

    involved comparing the numerical results from tests that nurses completed

    before and after receiving educational materials, and then performing statistical

    tests to check for significance in the findings.

    KRISTEN MAUK, PHD: I found a unit that was nearby, and they had opened a

    brand new rehab unit. And I collaborated with the nurse manager to see what

    would be the best methods for them to learn. And she said that her rehab staff

    didn’t really have a lot of training specifically in rehab. They were experienced,

    wonderful nurses, but they were opening a new unit.

    Well, my background was rehab, and I decided, ooh, well here was a good

    problem. Would education make a difference in their knowledge about

    rehabilitation? So that was my question. I designed, in collaboration with the

    nurse manager and the administration and using all those techniques about

    being a change agent, and communication, and people skills, we designed a

    project that fit that unit.

    So first I went to the literature and found that, yes, knowledge makes a

    difference. If you’re educating nurses, yes, they will– if you give them education,

    that will result in better knowledge. So I designed a pre- and post-test using a

    tool that was already in existence to measure rehab knowledge. And I took 15

    basic competencies of rehabilitation as set forth by the Association of

    Rehabilitation Nurses. Quantitative Research Designs: Dr. Kristen Mauk – Quantitative research for evidence-based practice

  • Case Study Marsha and Clement are both carriers of sickle cell disease, a disease that is autosomal recessive

    Case Study 1  Marsha and Clement are both carriers of sickle cell disease, a disease that is autosomal recessive. Their first child, Amelia, does not have the disease. Marsha and Clement are planning another pregnancy, but they are concerned about their second child having the condition. Clement’s dad died from complications of sickle cell disease shortly before Amelia was born.  1.Draw a Punnett square to determine the likelihood of Marsha and Clement having a baby with sickle cell disease. What is the chance the baby will be a carrier of the disease, just like the parents? 2.Marsha suggested to the nurse at the local family planning clinic that if the baby were a boy he might have a higher risk for developing the disease, just like his grandfather. If you were this Practitioner, how would you respond? 3.When Amelia, who does not have sickle cell disease, grows up and marries someone who does have the disease, how likely is it that her children will have the disease?

  • Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: Family Settings Versus Individual Settings

    Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: Family Settings Versus Individual Settings

    Review the media, Johnson Family

    Compare the use of cognitive behavioral therapy for families to cognitive behavioral therapy for individuals

    Analyze challenges of using cognitive behavioral therapy for families.

    ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW

    Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: Family Settings Versus Individual Settings

    Johnson Family Episode 3 Program Transcript

    [PEOPLE SOCIALIZING AT PARTY]

    MALE SPEAKER: Hey there. How you feeling?

    FEMALE SPEAKER: I’m drunk.

    MALE SPEAKER: Yes, you are. Here, have some more.

    FEMALE SPEAKER: I need to lay down. I don’t feel so good.

    MALE SPEAKER: No, no, no, no. Not here. Not here.

    FEMALE SPEAKER: Take me home.

    MALE SPEAKER: I can’t leave. It’s my frat party. I actually– But I’ll tell you what, let me take you upstairs. You can use my bed. OK?

    FEMALE SPEAKER: Sure.

    MALE SPEAKER: All right. Come on, Talia. I got you.

    FEMALE SPEAKER: I remember him lying me down on a bed and then he started kissing me. I think I kissed him back. And then he started taking off my pants. I told him to stop, but I must have passed out. When I woke up later, I didn’t have anything on. I just grabbed my clothes and got the hell out of there. I feel like such a fool. I had too much to drink. I don’t know why I let it happen.

    FEMALE SPEAKER: Thank you for sharing. It sounds like you still feel responsible for what happened. Has anyone else had similar feelings about something that’s happened to them?

    FEMALE SPEAKER: There was this guy once, I told him no just like you. I told him really loud, but it didn’t matter. He did what he wanted anyway. He raped me. And for some reason, I blamed myself for it. It took a long time and a lot of help to realize I was wrong. It wasn’t my fault. Just like it’s not your fault. That frat boy, he’s the one to blame.

    FEMALE SPEAKER: When it happened to me some of the people in my life, people I loved, they said it was my fault. Said that I shouldn’t have been where I was. Said it wouldn’t have happened otherwise. But it wasn’t my fault. It wasn’t. But to have people that you trust say those things about you, it’s confusing. It hurts.

    FEMALE SPEAKER: Thank you for sharing your thoughts and being supportive. It’s important in a group like this.

    FEMALE SPEAKER: Is it? Is it really? I’m not so sure. It hurts talking about it like this. It just, it keeps hurting

    Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: Family Settings Versus Individual Settings

  • NURS-6550 Mid Term Exam Questions and Answers – Advanced Practice Care of Adults in Acute Care Settings

    NURS-6550 Mid Term Exam Questions and Answers – Advanced Practice Care of Adults in Acute Care Settings

    Question 1

    1 out of 1 points

    The AGACNP is caring for a patient who is quite ill and has developed, among other things, a large right sided pleural effusion. Thoracentesis is sent for pleural fluid analysis. While evaluating the fluid analysis, the AGACNP knows that a fluid identified as a(n) __________ is the least worrisome type.

     

    Response Feedback:

    “A” is the correct answer. A transudate is essentially just water and can occur as a consequence of increased hydrostatic pressure in the pulmonary vessels. It typically implies that the some condition has produced an imbalance in colloid-hydrostatic pressures, such as CHF or hypoalbuminemia. While it can represent a serious problem, it may also represent a transient imbalance. Conversely, “B” is not correct as an exudate has more protein in it and implies a condition characterized by protein leaking from vessels, such as a malignancy or some serious systemic stressor. “C” is not correct—a chyliform effusion is characterized by fat and indicates a pathology causing massive triglyceride degradation. “D” is not correct as a hemorrhagic effusion is blood and typically means traumatic injury.

    Question 2

    ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER OR ONLINE EXAM NOW

    0 out of 1 points

    Mrs. Miller is transported to the emergency department by paramedics. She is having profound, unremitting chest pain, is diaphoretic and pale. She has jugular venous distention and a widened pulse pressure. Suspecting ascending aortic aneurysm, the AGACNP order which test to confirm the diagnosis? NURS-6550 Mid Term Exam Questions and Answers.

     

    Response Feedback:

    “D” is the correct answer. It is the most widely used diagnostic tool as it rapidly and precisely can outline the thoracic and abdominal aorta. “A” is not the correct answer—there are radiographic findings that suggest thoracic aneurysm, but they need confirmation by CT. “B” is not the correct answer as ultrasound is not nearly as precise as a CT scan. “C” is not correct—MRI is only indicated when the patient cannot have a contrast CT.

    Question 3

    1 out of 1 points

    Certain subgroups of the elderly population are at an increased risk for rapid deterioration and long-term care placement. Which of the following is not considered a high risk factor for long term care placement?

    NURS-6550 Mid Term Exam Questions and Answers – Advanced Practice Care of Adults in Acute Care Settings

    Response Feedback:

    “A” is the correct answer; men are at higher risk for long-term care placement than women. In addition to male gender, other risk factors include age over 80, living alone, bowel or bladder incontinence, history of falls, dysfunctional coping, and intellectual impairment.

    Question 4

    0 out of 1 points

    A patient with anterior epistaxis has been treated with 20 minutes of direct pressure to the cartilaginous portion of the nose. Following pressure the patient is instructed to gently blow the nose. Expected findings in the patient who has been successfully treated include all of the following except a:

     

    Response Feedback:

    “C” is the correct answer. If bleeding is successfully stopped with 20 minutes of directed pressure, there will be residual blood and clot formation. This is evacuated either by gentle suction or having the patient gently blow. Residual blood and formed clot may present as a sudden gush of dark blood or discharge with or without a clot—these are all typical expected findings. However, if bleeding is not stopped, it will continue as a bright red steady trickle. When this occurs, more invasive measures are indicated.

    Question 5

    0 out of 1 points. NURS-6550 Mid Term Exam Questions and Answers.

    Kevin is a 14-year-old male who presents for evaluation of a fever of 102.5° F and significant right ear pain. He appears quite ill and says he feels nauseous. Otoscopic evaluation reveals pain to palpation, a very erythematous and bulging tympanic membrane with bullous myringitis. The AGACNP knows that antibiotic therapy must be selected to cover:

     

    Response Feedback:

    “D” is the correct answer. 
    Streptococcus pneumoniae
     is the most common bacteria that infects the head and neck in immunocompetent persons, and is the primary treatment target when treating otitis media, bacterial sinusitis, and bacterial pharyngitis. “A” is not correct—while likely on broken skin and soft tissue, it is not common in the ear, nose, or throat unless specific risk factors exist. “B” is not correct—this is much more likely in an immunocompromised patient or a patient on mechanical ventilation. “C” is not correct—it is the second most common organism, but strep is the primary treatment target.

    Question 6

    1 out of 1 points

    P.M. is a 71-year-old gay male patient who presents as an outpatient for evaluation of increasing shortness of breath. The diagnostic evaluation ultimately supports a diagnosis of community acquired pneumonia. The AGACNP appreciates right middle lobe consolidation on chest radiography. Pending sputum cultures, empiric antibiotic therapy must be initiated to cover which organism?

    NURS-6550 Mid Term Exam Questions and Answers – Advanced Practice Care of Adults in Acute Care Settings

    Response Feedback:

    “D” is the correct answer. This patient presents from the outpatient population where the most common cause of pneumonia is 
    Streptococcus pneumoniae
    , and is the primary treatment target for any patient being treated empirically. “A” is not correct—while the patient’s sexual orientation is offered in the provided history, there is no indication that he has HIV/AIDS or any other condition characterized by immunosuppression that would increase his risk for this organism. “B” is not correct, as this organism is not typically seen in the outpatient population without specific risk, e.g. immunosuppression or chronic ventilator therapy. “C” is not the correct answer as this organism is not likely absent specific risk such as instrumentation or known colonization. NURS-6550 Mid Term Exam Questions and Answers.

    Question 7

    0 out of 1 points

    Which of the following is the greatest risk factor for vascular dementia?

     

    Response Feedback:

    “B” is the correct answer. Vascular dementia is a consequence of vascular disease, and is more likely to occur in patients with risk factors for target organ damage, such as hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes. “A” is not a distinct risk factor for vascular dementia; it is a risk for Alzheimer’s dementia. “C” likewise increases risk for Parkinson’s dementia, but does not present a risk for vascular dementia. “D” is not a risk factor for vascular dementia. Although there may be some familial risk for certain vascular diseases that may lead to vascular dementia, there is no clear familial tendency for this type of dementia.

    NURS-6550 Mid Term Exam Questions and Answers – Advanced Practice Care of Adults in Acute Care Settings

    Question 91

    1 out of 1 points

    A 31-year-old male presents to urgent care because he has something in his eye. He was changing the oil under his car and says that something dropped into his eye. He is not having any pain, in fact he waited a day before coming in because he thought it would work itself out. Physical exam reveals a black 1 mm foreign body visible on the corneal surface. The most appropriate intervention is to:

     

    Response Feedback:

    “C” is the correct answer. The nature of the injury suggests an external foreign body and it is visible to inspection. The absence of symptoms suggests that this is a simple external foreign body that will be easily removed with a saline soaked sterile swab. If unable to remove it this way, the more invasive Morgan lens or another method of eye irrigation may be utilized – but the least invasive acceptable method should always be tried first. “A” is not correct—there are not symptoms consistent with corneal abrasion. “B” is not correct as the history does not suggest an embedded or internal foreign body.

    Question 92

    0 out of 1 points

    A patient with pericarditis is most appropriately treated with:

     

    Response Feedback:

    “C” is the correct answer. Pericarditis is an inflammation of the pericardium, most often due to viral infection. The medication of choice is an NSAID. “A” is not correct—although isolated cases of pericardial inflammation are bacterial and require antibiotics, this is very uncommon. “B” is incorrect—NSAIDs generally control pain adequately and the escalation to opiate analgesia is rarely indicated. “D” is incorrect—as with choice “C” NSAIDs control pain adequately in most cases and use of corticosteroids while appropriate for NSAID-refractory cases, is uncommon.

    Question 93

    0 out of 1 points

    Which of the following is not a risk factor for thoracic aneurysm?

     

    Response Feedback:

    “B” is the correct answer. There are multiple risk factors for thoracic aneurysm, including “A,” “C,” and “D” above. However, aortic valve disease, not mitral valve disease, is correlated with increased risk. A variety of other factors including family history, smoking, and atherosclerosis, also increase risk. NURS-6550 Mid Term Exam Questions and Answers

    Question 94

    1 out of 1 points

    The “MONA” acronym provides guidance for immediate interventions in the patient with:

    NURS-6550 Mid Term Exam Questions and Answers – Advanced Practice Care of Adults in Acute Care Settings

    Response Feedback:

    “A” is the correct answer. MONA stands for Morphine, Oxygen, Nitroglycerin, and Aspirin, and should be considered for every patient with acute coronary syndrome. Morphine may not always be used—the general guideline is to administer to any patient who does not get pain relief with three doses of nitroglycerin—but it should be considered and administered if appropriate.

    Question 95

    1 out of 1 points

    NURS-6550 Mid Term Exam Questions and Answers

    Mr. Sloane is a 36-year-old male patient who presents for treatment of eye pain. He has no significant medical history and does not take any daily or over-the-counter medications. His only recent history is nighttime allergies for which he takes occasional diphenhydramine with good relief. He has had some throbbing in his eye for the last few days on and off but just ignored it; today he says it is flat out painful and he had to come to the emergency department. The eye is throbbing and painful, and he reports generalized decreased vision. The pupil is dilated to 5 mm and non-reactive to light. The eye conjunctiva is reddened. The next step in the diagnostic evaluation should be:

     

    Response Feedback:

    “A” is the correct answer. This is a classic presentation of acute angle closure glaucoma, the patient likely had an underlying anatomic abnormality that was exacerbated by the anticholinergic properties of diphenhydramine. Assessment of intraocular pressure via tonometry must be performed and if elevated will confirm diagnosis. Once elevated pressure is confirmed, the condition will be treated. “B” and “C” are not correct—the first diagnostic evaluation must be tonometric pressure; if pressure is normal, acute angle closure glaucoma is ruled out and then imaging may be indicted depending upon the differential diagnoses. “D” is not correct; if glaucoma is confirmed than ophthalmology will be consulted. NURS-6550 Mid Term Exam Questions and Answers.

    Question 96

    1 out of 1 points

    The AGACNP counsels a patient with recurrent epistaxis that the most common cause of nose bleeding is:

     

    Response Feedback:

    “A” is the correct answer. Statistically most nose bleeding is cause by the irritation of nose picking, and patients of all ages should be evaluated for this when presenting with a complaint of recurrent nose bleed. “B,” “C,” and “D” are also causes and are all part of the differential diagnosis and will guide the history of present illness, but “A” is most common and the first thing to be considered; similarly, while patients may not realize or acknowledge that this is a factor, if no cause is identified, counseling about the avoidance of nose picking may ultimately result in improvement of symptoms.

    Question 97

    0 out of 1 points

    NURS-6550 Mid Term Exam Questions and Answers

    The geriatric depression scale (GDS) is a commonly used tool to diagnose depression in the elderly population. It comes in a variety of forms for maximal utility. When administering the geriatric depression scale to patients, the AGACNP recognizes that it is extremely important to:

    NURS-6550 Mid Term Exam Questions and Answers – Advanced Practice Care of Adults in Acute Care Settings

    Response Feedback:

    “B” is the correct answer. All forms of the GDS require one word “yes/no” answers; the tool cannot be scored with more ambiguous or scaled scoring. “A” is incorrect—the tool helps establish a diagnosis of depression, and then the etiology will be pursued. “C” is not correct, in fact the one word answer format, different from most tools that use “1 to 5” scaled scoring, allows the tool to be used in those with more significant cognitive impairment. “D” is not correct as the tool can evaluate change after initiation or change in drug therapy. NURS-6550 Mid Term Exam Questions and Answers.

    Question 98

    1 out of 1 points

    Ventilator-acquired pneumonia (VAP) is a significant problem impacting morbidity, mortality and the cost of inpatient health care. Data-supported mechanisms to reduce the risk for VAP include all of the following except:

     

    Response Feedback:

    “B” is the correct answer. Strategies both pre and post intubation to reduce the likelihood of VAP have been extensively studied, and there are numerous data-supported strategies including those presented in choices “A,” “C,” and “D” above. Conversely, while “B” has been proposed as a possible strategy, data are conflicted. Endotracheal tube cuff biofilm formation and bacterial colonization are proposed mechanisms by which ventilator acquired pneumonia occurs, and there are several strategies in use to target this, such as antibiotic impregnated, chlorhexidine coated and silver coated endotracheal tubes. Cost and effectiveness data continue to emerge. NURS-6550 Mid Term Exam Questions and Answers.

    Question 99

    0 out of 1 points

    Absolute contraindications to thrombolytic therapy in the patient having an acute myocardial infarction include all of the following except:

     

    Response Feedback:

    “D” is the correct answer. A history of hemorrhagic ophthalmic condition is a relative contraindication; a risk benefit analysis must be considered and thrombolytics may be used. Conversely, “A,” “B,” and “C” above are all absolute contraindications to thrombolytic therapy.

    Question 100

    1 out of 1 points

    Which of the following is not a true statement with respect to risk for or occurrence of elder abuse?

     

    Response Feedback:

    “D” is the correct answer. There are a variety of theories regarding the etiology of caregiver abuse, and a common theme is that the greater the stressors and/or burden on the caregiver, the greater the likelihood of some form of caregiver abuse, whether psychological, physical, or neglect. Otherwise “healthy” people can become abusive if the demands placed upon them are great enough; this is one of the reasons that respite care is so important. “A,” “B,” and “C” are true statements. Caregiver stress is a risk factor, the cycle of learned violence suggests that those subjected to violence are at greater risk of becoming violent, and the greater the physical and/or mental impairment of the patient, the higher the risk for an abusive situation.

    NURS-6550 Mid Term Exam Questions and Answers – Advanced Practice Care of Adults in Acute Care Settings

  • The Nurse as Advocate Essay Assignment Paper

    The Nurse as Advocate Essay Assignment Paper

    Whether nurses are advocating for their patients, health care, and/or policies that improve people’s lives, the advocacy processes have commonalities that transcend the subject of their advocacy. There are also differences, although these differences may be more nuanced than obvious. The Nurse as Advocate Essay Assignment Paper

    Tasks:

    Write a 5-page brief to answer the following questions. Be sure to use APA guidelines for writing style, spelling and grammar, and citation of sources.

    ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW

    Read the following chapters from your course textbook:

    Taking Action: Nurse, Educator, and Legislator: My Journey to the Delaware Senate

    Taking Action: A Nurse in the Board Room

    Answer the below questions:

    Describe what you believe to be the drivers for each of the individuals? What factors led them to become advocates?

    Discuss the challenges that each of them identified in their writings. The Nurse as Advocate Essay Assignment Paper

    Analyze these drivers and challenges and compare them with your own experience to date as an advocate. In what ways do you believe that you can expand your advocacy skills within the next five years? The Nurse as Advocate Essay Assignment Paper.

    Submission Details:

    Submit your response in a 5-page Microsoft Word document.

    Submit your document to the Submissions area by the due date assigned.

    Cite sources in the APA format on a separate page. The Nurse as Advocate Essay Assignment Paper

  • NR506 HEALTHCARE POLICY – Planning Your Visit

    NR506 HEALTHCARE POLICY – Planning Your Visit

    Planning Your Visit (Part A)

    Guidelines and Grading Rubric

    Purpose

    The purpose of this assignment is to: (a) identify communication strategies that support an effective policy making-presentation/visit; (b) deliver a message and make recommendations, and (c) communicate ideas in a clear, succinct, and scholarly manner. nr506 healthcare policy planning your visit.

    Due Date
    : Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 5

    Total Points
    : 100 points

    ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW

    Requirements

    Assignment Criteria for Presentation

    Introduce your chosen policy issue, the current status, and an overview of your plan for a legislative visit.

    Articulate key communication strategies involved in your approach to the legislator including plan, message, and recommendations; see Worksheet 2 and again, the focus is on evidence-based communication techniques for effective healthcare policy visit to the legislator. nr506 healthcare policy planning your visit.

    Provide an analysis of empirical evidence of effective communication strategies and techniques to support an effective visit and follow-up to the legislator.

    Provide specific examples of the impact and/or importance of a successful visit/presentation to nursing.

    Provide concluding statements summarizing the content. nr506 healthcare policy planning your visit.

    Paper will be 2-3 pages, excluding title and reference pages, and in APA format 6
    th

    Five non-text book references are required as minimum.

    Preparing the nr506 healthcare policy planning your visit Paper

    Following completion of Planning Your Visit Ungraded Worksheet 2
    , target communication strategies that support an effective policymaking visit. Include a minimum of five (5) classic references or current references (published within the past 5 years) that support your policy plan, the message, recommendations, and follow-up.

     

    Category

    Points

    %

    Description

    Introduction and Conclusion

    10

    10

    Introduction briefly identifies your healthcare policy-priority issue, the policy itself and legislator with a plan for the policymaker visit/presentation. Concluding statements summarize content.

    Empirical Evidence

    50

    50

    Empirical evidence identifies effective communication strategies and techniques with follow-up supporting your visit to the legislator.

    Specific Examples

    20

    20

    Provide specific examples of the impact and/or importance of a successful visit/presentation to nursing. nr506 healthcare policy planning your visit

    APA Format

    10

    10

    Text, title page, and references are consistent with APA format 6
    th
    edition. nr506 healthcare policy planning your visit

    Writing Quality

    10

    10

    Rules of grammar, word usage, sentence and paragraph format, and punctuation are followed. Paper length appropriate.

    Total

     100

    100

    A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.

     

     

    Grading Rubric

    Assignment Criteria

    Exceptional

    (100%)

    Outstanding or highest level of performance

    Exceeds

    (88%)

    Very good or high level of performance

    Meets

    (80%)

    Competent or satisfactory level of performance

    Needs Improvement

    (38%)

    Poor or failing level of performance

    Developing

    (0)

    Unsatisfactory level of performance

    Content Possible Points = 100 Points

    Introduction and Conclusion. nr506 healthcare policy planning your visit

    10 Points

    9 Points

    8 Points

    4 Points

    0 Points

    Introduction briefly identifies your healthcare/policy-priority issue, policy itself, and legislator with a plan for the policymaker visit/presentation. Concluding statements summarizing content have no inaccuracy.

    Introduction of your healthcare/policy-priority issue, policy itself, and legislator with a plan for policymaker visit/presentation has rare inaccuracy. Concluding statements lack occasional important element or specificity.

    Introduction of your healthcare/policy-priority issue, policy itself, and legislator with a plan for policymaker visit/presentation lacks occasional important element or specificity. Concluding statements lack occasional important element or specificity.

    Introduction of your healthcare/policy-priority issue, policy itself and legislator with a plan for a policymaker visit/presentation has multiple instances of inaccuracies or is lacking content. Concluding statements have multiple instances of inaccuracies or lacks content.

    nr506 healthcare policy planning your visit. No attempt at introduction or conclusion.

     Empirical Evidence

    50 Points

    44 Points

    40 Points

    19 Points

    0 Points

    Empirical evidence of effective communication strategies and techniques with follow-up supporting your healthcare policy-priority visit to the legislator is clearly articulated.

    Empirical evidence of effective communication strategies and techniques with follow-up supporting your healthcare policy-priority visit to the legislator has a few inaccuracies.

    Empirical evidence of effective communication strategies and techniques with follow-up supporting your healthcare policy-priority visit to the legislator has multiple instances of inaccuracies or lacks detail/articulation.

    Empirical evidence of effective communication strategies and techniques with follow-up supporting your healthcare policy-priority visit to the legislator is missing.

    No attempt at providing Empirical evidence.

     Specific Examples. nr506 healthcare policy planning your visit

    20 Points

    18 Points

    16 Points

    8 Points

    0 Points

    Provides specific examples of the impact and/or importance of a successful visit/presentation to nursing and has no inaccuracy and is clearly articulated.

    Provides specific examples of the impact and/or importance of a successful visit/presentation to nursing and lacks occasional important elements or specificity and/or lacks clarity.

    Provides specific examples of the impact and/or importance of a successful visit/presentation to nursing and has multiple instances of inaccuracies and/or lacks clarity.

    No specific examples of the impact OR importance of a successful visit/presentation to nursing.

    No specific examples of the impact AND importance of a successful visit/presentation to nursing.

    Content Subtotal_____of 80 points. nr506 healthcare policy planning your visit

    Format Possible Points =  20 Points

    APA Format:

    10 Points

    9 Points

    8 Points

    4 Points

    0 Points

    Text, title page, and reference page(s) are completely consistent with APA format.

    There are 1–2 APA format errors in the text, title page, and/or reference page(s).

    There are 3–4 APA format errors in the text, title page, and/or reference page(s).

    There are 5 APA format errors in the text, title page, and/or reference page(s).

    There are 6 or more APA format errors in the text, title page, and/or reference page(s).

    Writing Quality.

    10 Points

    9 Points

    8 Points

    4 Points

    0 Points

    Paper is appropriate in length. References include the minimum of five (5) scholarly references, excluding the course text. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work. nr506 healthcare policy planning your visit

    Paper is short or long in length and/or contains fewer than 5 but more than 1 scholarly reference, excluding course text, or references utilized are not scholarly. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work with1–2 exceptions.

    Paper is short or long in length and contains only 1 scholarly reference. Additional references are not scholarly. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work with 3–4 exceptions.

    Paper is two or more pages short or long in length and does not contain scholarly references. References utilized are not scholarly. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are not followed with 5 errors

    Paper is two or more pages short or long in length and does not contain scholarly references. References utilized are not scholarly. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are not followed with 6 or more errors.

    Format Subtotal_____of  20 points

    NR506 HEALTHCARE POLICY – Planning Your Visit

  • NR451 Milestone2 Rubric

    NR451 Milestone2 Rubric

    Criteria

    Ratings 

    ORDER A CUSTOM-WRITTEN PAPER NOW

    Pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Introduction

    Introduction to the plan is nursing focused, with evidence-based problem identification and potential solutions clearly identified.). NR451 Milestone2 Rubric

    25.0 pts

    Introduction to the plan is nursing focused, and evidence-based. Potential interventions clearly identified.

    22.0 pts

    Introduction to the plan is missing one of the elements listed in the first column.

    20.0 pts

    Introduction to the plan is missing two elements listed in the first column.

    10.0 pts

    Introduction lacks evidence to support need for change and/or potential solution is not evidenced-based.

    0.0 pts

    Introduction is missing.NR451 Milestone2 Rubric

    25 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Change Model Overview

    An overview of the ACE Star model as a guide for change is given. Scope of the problem is identified. Stakeholders are identified. Team members and their roles and practice area are identified and discussed. State how nurses should use this model as a guide to facilitate change.

    50.0 pts

    Overview of the ACE Star model is given. Scope of problem is identified. Rationale for change is present. Stakeholders are identified. Practice area, team members and role are discussed.

    44.0 pts

    All elements in the first column are included but discussion of one or more items lacks details.

    40.0 pts

    Overview is missing one of the elements from the first column.

    19.0 pts

    Overview of the ACE Star model is given. Scope of problem is not identified. Rationale for change is not present. Stakeholders are not identified. Practice area, team members and role are not discussed.

    0.0 pts

    Change Model Overview is missing all elements of the first column.

    50 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Evidence

    Evidence is provided thru basic information that indicates a change is needed. For example, there have been 6 urinary tract infections over the last two months and there were none present the last two years at the same time period. What are some of the evidence-based interventions you discovered in your Evidence Summary that do you plan to use?

    50.0 pts

    Evidence summary is thoroughly provided with information of the current problem in the work setting indicating a change is needed. Interventions discovered in Evidence Summary are used in planning for change.

    44.0 pts

    Evidence summary contains all elements in the first column, however, one or more items lacks detail.

    40.0 pts

    Evidence is vaguely provided through information of the current problem in the work setting indicating a change is needed. Some of the interventions discovered in Evidence Summary are used in planning for change.

    19.0 pts

    Evidence is provided through information of the current problem but is not convincing. Interventions discovered in Evidence Summary are not used in planning for change.

    0.0 pts

    Evidence summary is not provided. NR451 Milestone2 Rubric

    50 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Translation

    Activities to achieve the final steps of change are fully described. What is needed to achieve? How do you translate what information you have gathered into practice? Include measurable outcomes. How do you inform staff? What is your plan of action to pilot the plan? What is the timeline?

    50.0 pts

    Activities to achieve final steps of change are fully described. Ways to translate evidence into practice are discussed (outcomes). Methods to inform staff, activities planned for plan of action and timeline are discussed.

    44.0 pts

    Activities to achieve final steps of change are adequately described.

    40.0 pts

    Activities to achieve final steps of change are briefly described.

    19.0 pts

    Minimal description of the activities to achieve final steps of change.

    0.0 pts

    Activities for final change plan are missing. Translation of evidence into practice is missing.

    50 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Conclusion

    Clear, solid summary of the key points, ACE Star model and steps of the change plan are included; ways to sustain the change plan are described.

    25.0 pts

    Detailed summary of main points using ACE Star model. Ways to sustain plan are thoroughly described.

    22.0 pts

    Summary of main points/model is brief. Ways to sustain plan are briefly described.

    20.0 pts

    Summary of main points/model is vague. Ways to sustain plan are vaguely described.

    10.0 pts

    Summary of main points/model OR ways to sustain plan are not described.

    0.0 pts

    Summary is missing. There is no plan to sustain change.

    25 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Mechanics

    APA format 6th edition. Grammar, sentence structure, punctuation, and spelling correct. References, citations correct. Paper formatted in APA format. 0-1 errors

    25.0 pts

    APA format 6th edition. Grammar, sentence structure, punctuation, and spelling correct. References, citations correct. Paper formatted in APA format. 0-1 errors

    22.0 pts

    Two to three errors in elements from the first column.

    20.0 pts

    Four to five errors in elements from the first column.

    10.0 pts

    Six to seven errors in elements from the first column.

    0.0 pts

    More than seven errors.

    25 pts

    NR451 Milestone2 Rubric

  • Capstone Project Milestone 2: Design for Change Proposal Essay Assignment Paper Guidelines

    Capstone Project Milestone 2: Design for Change Proposal Essay Assignment Paper Guidelines

    Purpose

    You are to create a Design for Change proposal inclusive of your Practice Issue and Evidence Summary worksheet from your Capstone Project Milestone 1. Your plan is to convince your management team of a nursing problem you have uncovered and you feel is significant enough to change the way something is currently practiced. In the event you are not currently working as a nurse, please use a hypothetical clinical situation you experienced in nursing school, or nursing education issue you identified in your nursing program.

    Course Outcomes

    ORDER A CUSTOM-WRITTEN PAPER NOW

    This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes.

    CO1: Applies the theories and principles of nursing and related disciplines to individuals, families, aggregates, and communities from entry to the healthcare system through long-term planning. (PO1)

    CO2: Proposes leadership and collaboration strategies for use with consumers and other healthcare providers in managing care and/or delegating responsibilities for health promotion, illness prevention, health restoration and maintenance, and rehabilitative activities. (PO2)

    Due Date

    Milestone 2 consists of the proposal for your Design for Change Capstone Project. Use the Turnitin Inbox to submit this assignment by the end of Week 4.

    Rubric

    Click to view and download the NR451 Milestone 2: Design for Change Proposal Rubric (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. Capstone Project Milestone 2: Design for Change Proposal Essay Assignment Paper Guidelines

    Points

    Milestone 2 is worth 225 points.

    You are required to use one of the required articles from the Week 3 Milestone 1 assignment or you will earn a ”0” for the assignment. In addition, assignments that do not follow the current guidelines or use the required article will be evaluated for evidence of an academic integrity violation. Capstone Project Milestone 2: Design for Change Proposal Essay Assignment Paper Guidelines

    After the due date, there will be no opportunity for revision or resubmission of assignments that have been uploaded to the submission area. It is your responsibility to submit the correct assignment to the correct submission area.

    Directions

    A tutorial with tips for completing this assignment may be viewed at https://atge.webex.com/atge/ldr.php?RCID=b0c912eaf53b4aabb1347a026466c60e (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

    Review the feedback you received from your instructor for Milestone 1, and use it to develop this milestone. Capstone Project Milestone 2: Design for Change Proposal Essay Assignment Paper Guidelines

    Create a proposal for your Design for Change Capstone Project. Open the recommended assignment specific Milestone 2 Design Proposal Template (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.. Use this to write your paper. You will include the information from Milestone 1, your practice issue and evidence summary worksheets, as you compose this proposal. Your plan is to convince your management team of a practice problem you have uncovered that is significant enough to change current practice. Capstone Project Milestone 2: Design for Change Proposal Essay Assignment Paper Guidelines

    The format for this proposal will be a paper following the Publication manual of APA 6 th edition.

    The paper is to be four- to six-pages excluding the Title page and Reference page.

    As you organize your information and evidence, include the following topics.

    Introduction:
    Write an introduction but do not use ”Introduction” as a heading in accordance with the rules put forth in the Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (2010, p. 63). Introduce the reader to the plan with evidence-based problem identification and solution.

    Change Model Overview:
    Overview of the ACE Star model (the model we have been discussing this session); define the scope of the EBP; identify the stakeholders, and determine the responsibility of the team members.

    Evidence:
    Conduct internal and external searches of evidence; integrate and summarize the evidence summary worksheet from Milestone 1; develop a recommendation for change.

    Translation:
    develop a hypothetical action plan; include measurable outcomes, reporting to stakeholders; identify next steps and disseminate the findings. Capstone Project Milestone 2: Design for Change Proposal Essay Assignment Paper Guidelines

    Conclusion:
    Provide a clear and concise summary, inclusive of the problem issue, the five points of the ACE Star change model; and ways to maintain the change plan.

    Citations and References must be included to support the information within each topic area. Refer to the APA manual, Chapter 7, for examples of proper reference format. In-text citations are to be noted for all information contained in your paper that is not your original idea or thought. Ask yourself, ”How do I know this?” and then cite the source. Scholarly sources are expected, which means using peer-reviewed journals and credible websites.

    Tables and Figures may be added as appropriate to the project. They should be embedded within the body of the paper (see your APA manual for how to format and cite). Creating tables and figures offers visual aids to the reader and enhances understanding of your literature review and design for change

    Capstone Project Milestone 2: Design for Change Proposal Essay Assignment Paper Guidelines

    NR451 Milestone2 Rubric

    Criteria

    Ratings

    Pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Introduction

    Introduction to the plan is nursing focused, with evidence-based problem identification and potential solutions clearly identified.) Capstone Project Milestone 2: Design for Change Proposal Essay Assignment Paper Guidelines

    25.0 pts

    Introduction to the plan is nursing focused, and evidence-based. Potential interventions clearly identified.

    22.0 pts

    Introduction to the plan is missing one of the elements listed in the first column.

    20.0 pts

    Introduction to the plan is missing two elements listed in the first column.

    10.0 pts

    Introduction lacks evidence to support need for change and/or potential solution is not evidenced-based.

    0.0 pts

    Introduction is missing.

    25 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Change Model Overview

    An overview of the ACE Star model as a guide for change is given. Scope of the problem is identified. Stakeholders are identified. Team members and their roles and practice area are identified and discussed. State how nurses should use this model as a guide to facilitate change.

    50.0 pts

    Overview of the ACE Star model is given. Scope of problem is identified. Rationale for change is present. Stakeholders are identified. Practice area, team members and role are discussed.

    44.0 pts

    All elements in the first column are included but discussion of one or more items lacks details.

    40.0 pts

    Overview is missing one of the elements from the first column.

    19.0 pts

    Overview of the ACE Star model is given. Scope of problem is not identified. Rationale for change is not present. Stakeholders are not identified. Practice area, team members and role are not discussed.

    0.0 pts

    Change Model Overview is missing all elements of the first column.

    50 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Evidence

    Evidence is provided thru basic information that indicates a change is needed. For example, there have been 6 urinary tract infections over the last two months and there were none present the last two years at the same time period. What are some of the evidence-based interventions you discovered in your Evidence Summary that do you plan to use?

    50.0 pts

    Evidence summary is thoroughly provided with information of the current problem in the work setting indicating a change is needed. Interventions discovered in Evidence Summary are used in planning for change.

    44.0 pts

    Evidence summary contains all elements in the first column, however, one or more items lacks detail.

    40.0 pts

    Evidence is vaguely provided through information of the current problem in the work setting indicating a change is needed. Some of the interventions discovered in Evidence Summary are used in planning for change.

    19.0 pts

    Evidence is provided through information of the current problem but is not convincing. Interventions discovered in Evidence Summary are not used in planning for change.

    0.0 pts

    Evidence summary is not provided. Capstone Project Milestone 2: Design for Change Proposal Essay Assignment Paper Guidelines

    50 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Translation

    Activities to achieve the final steps of change are fully described. What is needed to achieve? How do you translate what information you have gathered into practice? Include measurable outcomes. How do you inform staff? What is your plan of action to pilot the plan? What is the timeline?

    50.0 pts

    Activities to achieve final steps of change are fully described. Ways to translate evidence into practice are discussed (outcomes). Methods to inform staff, activities planned for plan of action and timeline are discussed.

    44.0 pts

    Activities to achieve final steps of change are adequately described.

    40.0 pts

    Activities to achieve final steps of change are briefly described.

    19.0 pts

    Minimal description of the activities to achieve final steps of change.

    0.0 pts

    Activities for final change plan are missing. Translation of evidence into practice is missing.

    50 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Conclusion

    Clear, solid summary of the key points, ACE Star model and steps of the change plan are included; ways to sustain the change plan are described.

    25.0 pts

    Detailed summary of main points using ACE Star model. Ways to sustain plan are thoroughly described.

    22.0 pts

    Summary of main points/model is brief. Ways to sustain plan are briefly described.

    20.0 pts

    Summary of main points/model is vague. Ways to sustain plan are vaguely described.

    10.0 pts

    Summary of main points/model OR ways to sustain plan are not described.

    0.0 pts

    Summary is missing. There is no plan to sustain change.

    25 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Mechanics

    APA format 6th edition. Grammar, sentence structure, punctuation, and spelling correct. References, citations correct. Paper formatted in APA format. 0-1 errors

    25.0 pts

    APA format 6th edition. Grammar, sentence structure, punctuation, and spelling correct. References, citations correct. Paper formatted in APA format. 0-1 errors

    22.0 pts

    Two to three errors in elements from the first column.

    20.0 pts

    Four to five errors in elements from the first column.

    10.0 pts

    Six to seven errors in elements from the first column.

    0.0 pts

    More than seven errors.

    25 pts

    Capstone Project Milestone 2: Design for Change Proposal Essay Assignment Paper Guidelines

  • Spin Doctoring Essay Assignment Paper – Critical Thinking Exercise

    Spin Doctoring Essay Assignment Paper – Critical Thinking Exercise

    This assignment is worth up to 75 points. We will apply course concepts from Myers Chapter 7 (Persuasion) to the following case:

    Case
    .  Spin doctoring is form of impression management that has been in the repertoire of public relations practitioners for four decades.  The term refers to the tactic of shifting the focus off of the negative and harmful aspects of something by substituting another issue that has positive connotations.  Spin doctors change the terms of public perception and debate using the mass media, which today includes blogs and social media like Facebook.  Spin doctoring is an international phenomenon the serves the interests of organizations in every sector of society.

    ORDER A CUSTOM-WRITTEN PAPER NOW

    The tobacco industry is considered to be the classic case of spin doctoring.  After 1966 when the Surgeon General of the U.S. pronounced that cigarette packages must carry a health warning, the tobacco industry found a way to offset the damaging publicity by sponsoring sports and arts events and giving grants for community development.  By de-emphasizing the dangers of smoking and emphasizing the positive contributions being made to community life, Big Tobacco trivialized the health problems and turned attention instead to its displays of corporate social responsibility. Spin Doctoring Essay Assignment Paper – Critical Thinking Exercise.

    A contemporary example of spin doctoring relates to the claim that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, which was the original rationale for the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003.  When the intelligence about weapons of mass destruction proved to be faulty, the debate was quickly and skillfully shifted by spin doctors to a humanitarian argument that the Iraqi people must be freed from the clutches Saddam Hussein the ruthless dictator.  While no evidence of weapons of mass destruction could be found, mass graves of Iraqi citizens killed at the behest of Saddam Hussein
    could
    be found and thus, legitimate the invasion. Spin Doctoring Essay Assignment Paper – Critical Thinking Exercise.

    The debate over climate change and global warming is very similar in some ways to the tobacco example because it involves the efforts of hydrocarbons producers to debunk the hypothesis that global warming is primarily caused by the high levels of CO2 emissions associated with the consumption of fossil fuels.  By spinning the argument away from CO2 emissions towards touting how technology is producing cleaner, greener fuels, the hydrocarbon industry gives the appearance of being environmentally responsible at a time when the pressure from environmental organizations like Greenpeace and the Suzuki Foundation, and high-profile environmentalists like Al Gore cannot be denied.

    Your Assignment
    :  Use critical thinking to analyze the following three questions relating to aspects of persuasion.  Specifically utilized the particular course concept or concepts stated in each question.

    Which paths(s) to persuasion is/are present in the global warming case? Explain how the paths are shown.

    How does the tobacco industry example fit into our understanding of impression management?

    Is spin doctoring the same as propaganda or is it fundamentally different? How so? Address the weapons of mass destruction case in your answer.

    Expectations

    You will address each of the required questions in essay form, explaining the reasoning behind your answer and identifying the course concept(s) explicitly;

    You will use subheadings so that each question clearly occupies its own section of the paper;

    Your name will appear on the first page of your paper; Spin Doctoring Essay Assignment Paper – Critical Thinking Exercise.

    You will use APA citations in the text and include a References section at the end of your paper

    You will spell and grammar check your paper

    Grading:

    60 points per question for quality of your answer and use and understanding of course terminology to each of the required questions (20 points per question). Spin Doctoring Essay Assignment Paper – Critical Thinking Exercise.

    15 points for orderly presentation in subsections, freedom from spelling and grammar errors, and use of APA style. Spin Doctoring Essay Assignment Paper – Critical Thinking Exercise